#Community Species Suggestions
1 messages · Page 48 of 1
Cyrto literally has Nasuto
I'm not referring to that one
tubicens
And regardless if the crest is wrong or not, it was a design choice for variety
I'm talking about Charon
are there any ceratopsians that would make for good cohab exhibits?
Tubicen doesn't really provide much that Charon doesn't
like with other ceratopsians
Charono with Tlatophus' crest was a neat maneuver ngl
Alright, so now I see it
Tubicens is the other member of Parasaurolophus
And Charonosaurus is probably the fourth one
Keyword on probably
or something
We have the crest of tubicens
Aight lets see... How many members are in the genus name of any specific animal that is currently ingame, or upcoming?
Did they change it for PK? I remember it still looking rather walkeri-esque.
Apatosaurus louisae
Dryosaurus elderae
Several Torvosaurus sp. from Africa and South America
Many Mammuthus species
Tyrannosaurus macraensis
Smilodon gracilis
Brontosaurus parvus
Brontosaurus yahnahpin
Parasaurolophus tubicen
Lambeosaurus magnicristatus
Protoceratops hellenikorhinus
Those are the ones I remember
Currently in the game at least
I’m sure there are more
Yeah
It’s very Tlatlophus like now
mcraeensis wasn’t even described when PK first entered EA
Tubicen is funny because it means “trumpeter” but was named before that use for the crest was widely accepted
I didn’t say it was
Oh also there’s like 10 more psittacos
Yeah and it's the same as walkeri
As was Charon until a couple updates ago
I’m assuming this is a list of alt species you’d like to see?
Paleopedia art still needs updated
There’s a bunch of website renders that need updating ngl
torvo and charono got tweaked
and I’m pretty sure Smilodon populator, the Camarasaurus trio, Tarbosaurus, and Edmontosaurus annectens all received tweaks to make them stand out more
so does the website
It’s clearly not?
Like similar length sure but way more bulbous
In all practical sense it is lol
My poor favorite iguanodontian
Barring legitimate suggestion, if you could put any animal into PK what would it be?
I know we have a pretty high level of ceratopsian and ornithopod representation, but I would shamelessly put Tenontosaurus or Einiosaurus into the game. My boys ✨
does it have to be just one
cause if not i want Dacentrurus, Ceratosaurus, and Hatzegopteryx
D. armatus or D. longicollum?
You can do that with Penta though, or any ceratopsian for that matter
Yeah but other ceratopsians aren’t Torosaurus
Fail to see the issue with that
It's the opposite of one, tbh
armatus
Both were good choices
My die-hard choice is confirmed for the game, so I'm gonna toss Cryolophosaurus.
Not exactly sure what you mean by "Barring legitimate suggestion "
Longicollum's the only one we actually have the neck of though
Champsosaurus
My boy
I mean I said one, but I did break my own rules lol
I mean yeah but given PK's approach to multiple species under the same genus, we could totally get away with saying both as alternate skins
yeah but armatus sounds cooler
Unless you're ten or younger, that shouldn't matter
Well it's still up in the air if miragaia is indeed dacentrurus it seems
So it shouldn't matter either way
What's your die-hard choice?
Bad
Allosaurus
If they're different enough, it kind of does. I don't want Dacentrurus if it turns out its neck isn't as relatively long
I mean it probably was
They were definitely closely related, the question is more so how close exactly
We also have a couple of cervical vertebrae from dacen holotype
anteosaurus, i can't name a single super relevant media depiction of it off the top of my head
it was a joke and an opinion nonetheless?
Lmao fair, fair
Allo's gonna look sick in-game, I hope they do three different species
I have been autistic about Allosaurus ever since i first watched Ballad of Big Al on my grandad's vcr
do i have fantastic news for you
Oh nice, I knew they planned to originally but I didn't know if that was still the plan
four
“it is imperative the cylinder remains unharmed”
caught that reference
my most wanted animal (carno) is already confirmed BUT
i would absolutely adore alioramus or qianzhousaurus
austroraptor and sivatherium would be cool too, MAYBE dire wolves as well
yang gang
i saw it and had to ruin it.
16 and 14
Carry the 1
If my math is working
¯_(ツ)_/¯
There's a reason why i swapped from scientific bachelor to social
Yeah it worked
Diplocaulus
Sinosauropteryx
Anchiornis
Deinogaleryx
Acanthostega
Heterodontosaurus
Eilenodon
Mesosaurus
Any rhynchosaur
Drepanosaurus
Coelurosauravus
Diictodon
Thrinaxodon (or any cynodont for that matter)
Lepticidium
Rapenomamus
Halszkaraptor (especially if aquatic)
Suminia
Scutellosaurus
Gigarcanum
Passenger pigeon
Mekosuchus (could also work as a full exhibit species considering its pretty big)
Pterodactylus
Anurognathus/jehelopterus
Didelphodon
Darwinius
no mononykus 
There's a lot of others that I didn't include, but I would say this a minis roster I would be quite happy with
Skipped out invertebrates and snakes and bigger stuff since those might work differently too
Mononykus smells bad

honestly based list
Kept it limited mostly to better known stuff, I would probably include more crocodylomorps and smaller mammals but idk how many chances they got lol
(Exception being deinogaleryx but I really really want it)
They would need to make a really big vivarium for Titanoboa
I can’t really see it being a regular exhibit animal
we're getting some really big vivaria
The large terrarium (8x12) is basically exactly the size requirements of keeping a Titanoboa, scaling up modern snake requirements
Okay, some suggestions:
Use Kuehneosuchus instead of Coelurosauravus for a gliding "lizard"; it's slightly bigger at a length of 72 cm but a wingspan of about 40-56 cms.
Leaving out Ceratogaulus is a crime. You left out Lystro as well and no I don't care that there are big fully habitat species; the best studied, the most commonly found and the type species are the smaller Triassic only ones that only work in a vivarium.
Also there's no fish here.
snakes don't need an excessive amount of space in general
Otherwise it's a good list
ez kept this chat active
in addition most people would get bored after dumping out their wishlist anyway
I feel like diictodon is better known than smaller lystro so I put that one instead
I doubt that, mostly because I think you're overestimating how well known diictodon. Also Dominion.
I think this post Contain every known extinct life forms by humans
Even tho Irratator is a VERY fragmented specimen. I WOULD like to revive it simply cause I think it’d be a fantastic end to its story. Like think about it
“Oh, fossil poachers found this new fossil but artificially modified it cause they weren’t sure it was a new fossil? Well GUESS WHAT! We BROUGHT IT TO LIFE SO THERE-“
Suchomimus is a far better choice. Has animals in-game to go with, more complete and it was more terrestrial than other Spinosaurs
Yeah though imo Spino and Bary are enough
Not really, Sucho completed the trinity and stands on it’s own
Ive generally seen diictodon being asked more here, but small lystro is also a valid alternative, they arent that different
what about
the bananaspinus
It may not be 100% essential but it’s a worthy addition
I feel like there is a difference between a group feeling complete in its representation in a vacuum and being complete enough for the purposes of this game. Like maybe Sucho would be good alongside Spino and Bary but think about all of the other groups of animals worthy of being added to the game that would have their diversity hampered by a third spinosaurid
and so many of them would be lucky to even have a single representative for their group
It may not be 100% essential but it’s a worthy addition
There is no trinity, that's just a second baryonychine
Sucho would be a bary alt, but it's not needed
Irritator may as well work as a half grown Spino alt, Suchomimus is pretty much an overgrown Bary which would look highly similar at comparable sizes
trinity of best name recognition Spinosaurs
Neat stuff, but people really overestimate spinosaur diversity
and again, so many groups would be lucky to even have a single representative
And I have grown very weary of people wanting Oxalaia in jurassic games
And that might have to do with the fact that people believed that Diictodon was coming to the game. It's a good animal but L. murrayi just has more going for it overall.
i'm with you there, there's no way there are like 5-7 distinct spinosaur genera in iberia
that's a very unequal trinity in terms of name power
They're the 3 i've noticed that layfolk know more than other spinosaurs
I'm not arguing against that, simply saying that for a lot of people their only exposition to diictodon and lystrosaurus is from wwm
I'm going to be honest here, while I readily admit that I probably underestimate the impact of WWD amongst the public, I don't think I'm wrong in saying that WWM's was basically negligible. Dominion also exists by the way.
And that might have more impact on what people think of Lystro.
I doubt people would give nearly as much of a shit about gorgonopsids were it not for WWM and Primeval
because if not then what would they have to showcase them? that short scene from Dinosaur Revolution?
Correct and that's why laypeople think that "gorgonopsid" is an actual genera because of Primeval.
So really, what did they learn?
I mean to be fair
WWM did the same thing
I don't think any genera is used for that gorgon either
It's gorgonops but that's only in side material.
Specially with no overlaping material
I can see the Baryonyx lineage giving rise to Suchomimus as time went by ngl, those are 12 million years in-between, but the taxonomical approach has been subpar
Specially with the approach to spinosaurines across Gibraltar
(And oh boy the collab between Spanish paleo and Sereno, which I expect to hold up as well as Carcha iguidensis whenever it gets published at this rate)
Most people just want it as a second spino to either represent an accurate or a JP version
Then ask for a variant
Frontier doesnt include variants in their packs
For these not tied to jp at least
So asking for Oxalaia is still best thing to do
DEATH
Estemmenosuchus is a good choice me thinks
Yeah probably my second most wanted dinocephalian
Second?
Anteosaurus is the superior Permian apex predator and deserves even half the attention that gorgonopsids get
Absolut
Bro so big it needs 2 image slots
IMO there are at least 12+ Permian genera that are well enough known and unique enough to make it in
Some comment on the internet said that this is "The Tyrannosaurus Rex of the Permian Period"
man't fuckin built like one
fr if dlcs are 4-6 species then the Permian has enough big species inclusions for 2 whole dlcs, maybe even more
I really hope it gets proper representation especially since it is the only time period one can reasonably expect Paleozoic species to come from that won't be terrarium species
mhm
Hyperodapedon the "reptile" rat
puntable, 10/10
Yea I was suggesting it for the end of its story idea. It’d just be cathartic imo
What story?
the very hungry suchomimus
I do hope we get suchomimus eventually in one way or another
It was about Irritator
Elrhaz rep without suchomimus
basically the closest synapsids ever got yeah
The story behind Irritator’s discovery. Fossil poachers modified the fossil with plaster before selling it to some paleontologists.
The paleontologists name the dinosaur Irritator cause they KNOW it’s a new dinosaur, but now it’s tainted by the modifications so they don’t know exactly what to do about it.
So bringing the story to a full close by reviving him would be really satisfying imo
Pretty decent now that I look at it
Honestly we are a Weald rebbachisaur away from those two being pretty much interchangeable lol
Sarco and a beautiful JWE2 render of Nigersaurus
Acrocanthosaurus
What a gluppshito
If you want the devs to add something atleast say an animal with a smidge of a chance of making It in
hmmm
Megaraptor.
Do you even own the Game? Megaraptor is already in the game bruh
that's macroraptor
get it right
tru
Weald got like
Baryonyx
And horshamosaurus lmao
Istiorachis is pretty much Weald Ourano
I don't remember us finding any Thyreophorans in Elrhaz
True
I know the 2 are very similar, but I thought that one was from wessex
Wessex is part of the Wealden group
Weald basin covers the different outcrops
People really hyperfocus on the word "formation"
You have the same faunal assemblage in Spain and in England at that time (like we do today pretty much), FWIW
Demandasaurus is a rebacchisaur that would have met Iguanodon
The Weald is well studied geologically for coal-related reasons I believe
That's cause England has no trees
In fairness, the term formation can end up kinda meaning many things
When you mention "weald", I'm thinking you are talking about the formation specifically, not the group as a whole
But yeah, they do share quite a bit of faunal overlap, tho I wouldnt say they are interchangeable, exception being ourano and sucho
The rest is pretty unique
Even the elrhaz iguanodontian seems to have been doing weird stuff, even if it wasn't properly semi aquatic
I mean, people talk about the Wealden as a whole
It covers 15 million years but most of the dinosaur fauna talked about is from the last 3 million years or so
And, well, they are literally next to each other
Digsites some 70 miles away or so
Still, Elrhaz is some 10 million years younger
I have a large Permian carnivore suggestion that hasn’t been suggested individually yet
If its Anteosaurus, someone beat you to it or something
It’s not
its Tappenosaurus
yet
I mean, I dunno if we have more, thus far all there is is "potentially chonky potential sphenacodont"...
(I know you know more than me about Permian stuff tho)
it probably has more sphenacodont proportions
aka not as chonky
im not an expert in America
irrc correctly they coexisted
Chonky boi dlc
Coty, toxodon, beelzebufo, etc.
The little pig creature that had a third periscope eye
I dont remember its name
Moeritherium too
If PK gets more than 5 permian habitat species I will call it success already
Dimetrodon edaphosaurus cotylorhynchus inostrancevia and scutosaurus if so
Tappeno is quite the enigma
I do hope some researchers in the future do a more thorough study on it
Me personally I hope for like
Roughly 15 permian exhibit animals
Which is a bit much but I am a big fan of permian boys
I am playing it safe
That is fair all things considered
15 is lowkey ridiculous number when I consider dinosaur and non-dinosaurs proportions some people suggest out there
If there is 5 years of support post EA it would be like 20% of all new animal additions coming from permian
Which I am all in for, but somehow hard to imagine
What about 10
Estemmenosuchus anteosaurus moschops eryops and something else idk
In addition to the 5 I said earlier
2 free and 7/8 for dlcs
Damn there's really no 10th that's half as known as these ones lol
Lystrosaurus technically
Ophiacodon?
Really depends on how many animals is going PK able to pump ot
I'll stick to my own suggestion for Paleozoic animals
My take would be
Edaphosaurid
Sphenacodontid
Varanopid
Didectifomes
Temnospondyli
Deinocephalian
Biarmosuchian
Anomodont
Gorgonopsian
Archeosaur
You get one from most major groups at the time
Granted there’s no moradisaurids, Small early reptiles, paraisaurus and Caseaids
Are any varanopids actually big enough; I know varanops could work for a mini
Don’t think so
I mean Varanops
Yeah based on Wikipedia size which isn’t always accurate it’s big for the time
Yes on the basis that it’s average size for a Permian animal
why is vanilla looked at as plain and boring
who decided that
vanilla is amazing even if there’s better
FINALLY A QIANZHOUSAURUS
I WANNA SEE BABY ALIORAMINS STUMBLE AROUND
Idk. Permian sounds just like most paleozoic as something to enjoy vivariums more
Even 10 habitat species is a lot
PK will need to earn plenty money to affort this many of them
Adzebill ?
New Caledonia had a lot of cool animals too
Perhaps islands' expansion would be cool
why not three of them 🤷♂️
that was a 3 day old comment
What's your take on something like Glanosuchus
Alopecognathus is the best of that group
Any particular reason, the wiki page is next to useless
basically in 2023 kammerer did a review of the whole group and one of the best specimens got reassigned from Glanosuchus to Alopecognathus
That makes sense.
What’s funny is that a Permian dlc would probably be mostly animals with similar bodily structures
In that they're quadrupeds, sure
My recent obsession with Moby dick has given me a new interest in Livyatan
Manis palaeojavanica , a sheep size pangolin
Oh lord
No clue, cause vanilla is my favorite flavor of ice cream lol.
I also don't think allo is actually that generic, especially not with the facial crests and the hatchet bite
On one hand, a PK Livyatan would be so peak.
On the other... I dont know how well that'd be received (in universe) due to the way that SeaWorld handled orcas...
Hatchet bite isn't real
Who cares
These people presumably ressurect animals just to keep them in zoo
Doubt SeaWorld comes close to whatever is happening in PK universe
^
This is a game and I wanna see the prehistoric animals, limiting the roster for realism doesn't make sense since they are extinct
except for hominids closer to humans but I think that's a different issues
Prehistoric apes and things would be interesting and fun to have but I feel like they would be far too close to humans in appearance and etc
Chimpanzees and Gorillas are in zoos, most apes would probably be fine
I could be fine with australopithecus too, but I leave it out usually because I think you have to draw the line somewhere and the weight australopithecus carries is pretty important on our own evolution
Paranthropus…
I would be ok with a very basal Australopithicus like Lucy but a lot of people, devs included, aren't
even if Australopithecus was effectively just a bipedal chimpanzee its inclusion would make it too close to the phenomenon of human zoos that literally still existed a little over a century ago and carry with them a lot of racism
it's best to just not include them
How
If its a bipedal chimpanzee… then its a bipedal chimpanzee, and chimpanzees are still kept in zoos.
They're too similar/closely related to humans
Beyond being bipedal and their feet, they wouldn’t really resemble humans a whole lot
any zoo sim should be well aware to distance itself from the racist history of zoos in the early 20th century and beyond
Its due to association
Since australopithecus it's often seen as the first piece of the puzzle that lead to humans, we tend to see it more like us rather than other apes
I just don’t get this angle
Even if it doesn't follow biological logic, it would still be a level of uncanniness that would turn people off from the game
They’re not a race but a very distinct species
who said they were a race?
You keep comparing it to racist human zoos
the fact is keeping human beings in zoos is wrong
putting in an animal both is and looks like a primitive human is going to make people think of human zoos
But they’re not human is my point
ok? who cares
do you seriously think doing this wouldn't create controversy?
I mean cloning dinosaurs would create controversy
GMOs today alone create controversy
But my point is comparing it to human zoos feels wrong
Because they’re not human, not even close like erectus or Neanderthals. They don’t particularly look human, they wouldn’t particularly act human.
it doesn't matter
their inclusion would make people uncomfortable and open the door for people to act racist
I don't understand how you can't see this
My only issue is comparing Australopithecus captivity to human zoos
I don’t particularly disagree with the devs
You think adding them wouldn't be controversial? You don't think it would look racist?
Of course it’s controversial but it’s definitely not racist
Because again they’re not a race and they’re not even human-adjacent
People would use their inclusion to make their own "human zoos"
Human zoos in Planet Zoo 🗿
Australopithecus is a little too smart to be in zoos
Like the sheer amount of enrichment you’d need for em would make you think twice
That’s my reasoning
I mean the early species are equivalent to chimpanzees
Please don't remind be about that subject I want to forget a doc about it , it's very disturbing experience
And chimps are still hella hard to keep
Ya gotta kill em if they escape, since tranqs don’t even work
Australo is just smarter
?
Chimps aint hard to keep. There are many many of them in zoos
Wdym tranqs don’t work?
literally all that matters is that an Australopithecus exhibit would look like a human zoo. You don't need to mention anything else for the argument, them looking human is enough to make it a bad move because people can use that to be racist.
chimps aren't that difficult, cetaceans and elephants are harder afaik
Just curious. You feel same thing about bonobos?
wym
Because australopithecus was most likely like bonobo
in what way?
I mean looking like one?
bonobos arent bipeds they just look like chimps
It’ll have already killed a bunch of people before the tranqs even begin to take effect on the system
Very similar animals
We just reconstruct is as more human like to put emphasis on ancestry
If Australopithecus was alive today there would be no more controversy over keeping them than other great apes
The issue is that they’re in our ancestral line
To be fair many people wierd out seeing other monkeys
This is a stupid argument
people-shaped things in zoos bring to mind dehumanized people put into zoos, we dont need to argue about a hypothetical
what if the world were made of pudding
That would be epic indeed
what
It would be awesome
Pudding Baron of the New World
you must be being obtuse on purpose rn
this is, IMO, more about us than it is about them. With history in mind it could feel somewhat gross to see a human shaped thing in a zoo, especially since multiple species in the game are named by a guy who literally put a human in a zoo
Nigel…
what?
And again this something that we absolutely do NOT need in game
I wasn’t arguing for that
Ha-Satan you don't seem to be taking this seriously at all
Although I do want Gigantopithecus
The one said to be related to Orangutan or something, yet at the same time it isnt?
I mean I was until the pudding part
the pudding thing is a stock response to hypotheticals which are irrelevant to the discussion
I'm confused on the Giant Ape
what Phorcys said
They’re most closely related to orangutans among extant species but they’re not closely related, very far divergence
Gigantopithecus is known mostly from teeth and jaws and we dont know much about them, closer to orangs than to african apes but not super close
If that was the case, I could technically bring upon the end by eating the entire world
I was literally making a shorthand response to your ridiculous statement
“Mostly”
Entirely
isnt there some paleo DNA or am I mixing it up with something else
Afaik no, that’d be really old for DNA
or would it???
?
ah, it was proteins in the teeth
that's what I was remembering
so still part of the tooth fossil
what if it was a regular sized ape with a huge chin
It didn’t have a chin
I swear I've seen people associate the ape with Bigfoot
or Sasquatch or whatever the hell
Chins are something almost exclusive to humans
monkey.
Yes but for stupid reasons. Even if sasquatch was real, it’d be a hominine not pongine.
Not literally but that wasnt really the point of the joke
sasquatch for PK
Who's to say that a few of those "hominine" primates wouldn't have JUST been the real Sasquatch of all times?
Like Australopithecus and a few others
Sasquatch isn’t extinct yet
prove it.
Sasquatch would obviously be giant bipedal howler monkey
Whats next, an animal thats all chin?
Doesn’t a chin need to project outwards?
Yeah it needs to point forward, so that doesn’t count
Don't elephants kinda have them
didnt know Dan put together a new giga.
Tbh
I can believe the cyclop elephant theory because they look uncanny in a human way lol
does satan have a chin?

If they ever add any -pithecus to the game, I hope it has “giganto” or “dino” in front of it
I am going to be genuinely upset with dinopithecus
Leaning more towards giganto
Bigfoot is real
I hope we get Paradolichopithecus instead of Australo for sillies
Mesopropithecus 💯
Lemurs are doing heavy lifting in prehistoric primate departament
Archaeoindris is my choice.
If this isn't a setup for alternative speculative evolution, I don't know what is
That quagga in the back:
Chewbacca ain't even an ape
what i ant to know, is what the source of the recon for G. blacki is there
The article listed [DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-439] is about adult human biomass
I literally just looked up “gigantopithecus size” on google images
I understand its size is still being debated tho
It was definitely around gorilla size
Gorilla-sized orang(?)
so real
so based
Can we get an ape that we actually have more just part of a skull and a handful of post-cranial material?
non
Good-bye Darwinius
Which do you like the least: gorillas, orangutans, chimps, bonobos, or gibbons?
all of them equally pervert the human form
All of them. I'm in team happy to never see any primates in pk.
So you would be okay with say a targeted campaign that would make them eligible for the Recently Extinct pack.
Objection, your honour, leading question
Overruled
Paradolichopithecus
I have a complete specimen in my backyard
didnt we talk before about how Sinopithecus helps give us a clearer picture of Gigantopithecus
There's another one?
another what
Sivapithecus
Ah
Wouldn't orangutans still be their closest relatives
Apparently not
isnt it funny
archaeoindris is also known mainly from cranial material
Archaeoindris is funny, because close relative was hanging upside down like sloths do
And fossil remains for it indicate similar animal, but bigger
What's wrong with it
I think its because its only known from skulls
We already have mammoths; fucking tired of Blackfish/Free Willy Helen Lovejoy crap ngl
Why do you count the 2 chimp species separatedly while lumping 20 species across 4 genera in a single cathegory?
SMH bonobos are a chimp species, we just realized they were distinct from the common chimp quite early on, but the distinction is forced, specially now that we also have 2 gorillas and 3 orangutans
I mean we have the name might as well use it
That's a monkey, not an ape
is there any other ape worth adding other than gigantopithecus?
.... it was the setup for a joke that fell flat
Sorry, pet peeve of mine
(FWIW, apes are a subset of monkeys, and English is the sole language to make a distinction)
Case in point
Circling back to the older conversation but another issue with adding something like Australopethicus beyond ethical is how to actually implement it.
Any hominin would have to have significantly more intelligent and complex ai than any other animal, just due to all the nuances of homonin behaviour. Things like tool use etc would definitely be needed and would just be too much to add.
Not very different from chimps behaviourally ngl
Apes are all resourceful bunches
Australopith grade animals had one very humanlike character tho, and that was the gait
Picture a chimp walking pretty much exactly like a human and you have Lucy
And that's uncanny as fuck
Paradolichopithecus better anyways 🙏
I literally think the only true monkey that feels like a necessary addition to the game as an exhibit species is Gigantopithecus. Subfossil lemurs feel better as options for additional exhibit primates
honestly agreed
the best primates for PK IMO would be really basal vivarium species or subfossil lemurs
I think really basal vivarium species have the best chance due to them being the least primatelike really
and they are in vivariums so the complex animations would be somewhat lessened
Aenocyon Dirus, mayhaps?
Tbf not everyone is in this thread daily suggesting obscure fossils
true...
Dire wolf is based pick
Earliest diverging Caninan is not that remote ttbt, but still a fair pick; Epicyon is IMO cooler tho, but both are good
goes without saying
Borealopelta is a cool specimen, but wouldn't make a good addition imo
why
it has a long spike ratio to the body relatively to the other armored animal in game
I would like it as an alt definitely
as an entire slot? no thank you
but as an alt? 1000%
#1360542295228944414 message
i dont see it as a problem
I think it could definitely work as an alt
This means literally nothing when we only have two ankylosaurs
and if its literally just one alt, then the argument of too well preserved doesnt really apply
scelido
and anky
i still don't see it as a problem
its a well preserved animals, it should be in game
it could 1000% work as an alt for pmuch any nodosaur
seeing as all ankylosaurs would feasibly share the same rig anyway
closeness of relatives also isnt as much of a factor as it used to be
i dont care if its an alt or entirely different slot
Only the front half
the guy need to be there
It's a massive nothingburger
Juxia is about as close to Paraceratherium as Borealopelta is to Sauropelta
how the fuck its a nothingburger???
at least if im reading this right
Borealopelta is probably just basic nodosaur, but its a really really really well preserved basic nodosaur
so its epic
Carnotaurus is basically the same scenario tbh and everyone loves Carnotaurus
The only interesting thing about it is that it's well preserved and from a marine deposit
i dont get it
you said its not a good addition
and then you said its so well preserved based on droid quote
and then you said its only front half
and then you said its a massive nothingburger
???
These can all be true simultaneously
bruh
ok its well preserved
what makes it worse than any other nodosaur
Idk why you're working yourself up over this
No interesting feature imo
im not, im just kinda curious as to why you think its a bad addition compared to other ankylosaurs/nodosaurs
ok thats a fairly valid reason
there are definitely flashier ankylosaurs ye
I wasn't directing that at you ftr
ok so its a about nothing interesting
That's literally what a nothingburger is
Outside of its preservation, what does it have?
its just simply looks different compared to anky and sceli
That's how clades tend to work
generic nodosaur vibe ig
also has a bunch of added bonuses with being so well preserved
we know its rough coloration so thats a plus
It's a nodosaurid compared to the ankylosaurid and scelidosaurid we have
kinda like Pssitacosaurus sp.
There are infinitely more interesting nodosaurids
Sauropelta, for obvious example
but I can definitely see where your coming from
more interesting nodosaurs first makes a lot of sense
but if we ever get 1-2 other nodosaurs, Borealopelta would be a good pick
can we get shara ishvalda
There are a bunch of good nodosaurs to pick from - and that is what kicks Borealopelta further down imo
as basic as borealopelta it should be here
you cant just said "this thing is too basic"
if you said that meaning a basic hadrosaur like edmonto or basic sauropod like brontosaurus shouldnt be here
torvo? basic medium theropod
just bad opinion
It's not, nor were your fallacious extrapolations appreciated. It's behaviour like this that genuinely makes me question being here
im questioning why its even a thing
"its too fragment" shouldn't as same as "its too well preserved" and "its too basic"
people already complained about people asking for a species that coming from 5cm of fossil and then people complained because its too well preserved??? especially the family wasn't even in game yet??
I dont think it's that deep yall
This is a discord suggestion thread for a videogame
I dont think there's any objectively wrong opinion when it comes to species wishlists, just different preferences
Yeah
You think borealo is boring
Ok, I dont but thats fine
It does personally feel weird to me to insist that one of the best understood ornithischians shouldn’t be in the game
I'd hardly consider it one of the best understood, but that's just me
What do you find interesting about it?
Preserved red coloration or something, thats the color of Borealopelta
... Wait, that raises a question
Where was that mummified fossil of the animal found?
Oh
Which one?
Fair reason to like it, but imo that doesn't offer much for an ingame animal to me 
Marine deposit
So would you say somewhat close to the Western Interior Seaway?
Fort McMurray oil sands
It was in the western interior seaway, yes
Where did it originate? Who knows
Or at least the progenitor of it, it hadn't extended all the way to bisect North America yet
So just the western interior sea, not western interior seaway
Looked into Pinacosaurus for a small ankylosaur
Or at the very least somewhat small
Preserved larynx, bird-like vocalizations
From asia
probably bird like in sound vaguely but not nessicarily in pitch
like how tiger calls are basically the same as housecats, just signifigantly lower pitch
I think Polacanthus is underrated as a choice for a nodosaur species or as an alt to another species
Also, Stegouros and Kunbarrasaurus getting added as alts of one another would be great imo
Polacanthus + Gastonia would be epic
I just rewatched Giant of the Skies and Polacanthus feels like it would be neat to have cohabbed alongside Iguanodon
Exactly
(even though tbh I doubt many Ankylosaurs would make for decent cohab species irl given how dangerous their weaponry is lol)
Can always do a faux cohab too
god you just reminded me of the shitty reboot that had Utahraptor seemingly specializing to hunt Gastonia for whatever reason 😭
what's that
like an invisible barrier type deal?
ah yeah then that is what I was thinking of
But from above there's some sort of barrier, like a moat, splitting them
So they aren't physically interacting
I grew up visiting the Bronx Zoo all the time so I know that kind of setup very well
they use that for the Lions and gazelles
cool
byeah I think it would be Peak
I'm not really opposed to Borealopelta either but wasn't it like, by itself?
Yeah we dunno what it would have lived with specifically
It was found in what would become the WIS
Miles offshore
yeah that does feel like a negative in that regard
would be cool to find another specimen of the same species one day
to tie it back to a terrestrial fossil formation
yeah that's the big downside
for a dinosaur to be added while it is alone in its formation it should be truly unique and/or popular
like Muttaburrasaurus or Carnotaurus
Or an alt but I assume you aren't counting those
popularity absolutely factors in
Because that's how the game works
why do you think Argentinosaurus was added over any other better preserved titanosaur?
The cursed bias
?
cursed?
Could've gotten Dreadnoughtus alongside Argent, or even Patagotitan and another titanosaur of South America
ok but what do you mean by cursed
(also of it were up to me to add another titanosaur it would be Alamosaurus)
I don't really see why we need another SA giant titanosaur tbh
Argent is the quintessential one
And I don't really see why people want to limit how many animals are represented in one area just because of varying factors
Who's to say suggesting species that are quite obscure wouldn't help boost their popularity?
- No one said it wouldn't
- That's not the point in the game regardless?
I mean, I would love some obscure species but overall they're gonna want to include stuff the fandom wants to see
if obscure taxa are going to be added then they should be interesting enough to warrant putting them in over something that is already more popular
Someday theres gonna be a crowd of people who want Dreadnoughtus, doesn't matter if "ANOTHER SA GIANT TITANOSAUR ISNT NEEDED" I know well some people are going to want it
There already is a crowd who want Dread
Yeah I have no idea what I am doing anymore
Dread is fine for like dlc or something down the line
Just not needed by any means atm
that's why preservation quality and uniqueness in body plan or lifestyle is important because if the obscure taxon isn't special compared to a species that would function the same as it but with more popularity then it doesn't have any reason to be included besides being different for the sake of it.
Ceratopsians like Torosaurus and Triceratops look somewhat similar and yet they both are quite distinct in their own sense somehow
🤷♀️
Toro and Trike still have differences that actually make them different
I don't see the point in "specialty" and "popularity" and whatever as a requirement for adding a species
And yet thats just how it is
Thats pretty much it
I don't see the point in biases like popularity, completeness, and such being the main requirement for any animal in particular
Kinda bugs me, but even then I know thats just how it is
Can't do anything about it
The bottom line is that we can't/just aren't able to have every single animal that ever existed in one game, so unfortunately some will get in and some won't make the cut, that's just how it is
Honestly, Megalosaurus itself should've been added in JUST BECAUSE ITS THE FIRST DINOSAUR EVER DISCOVERED FOR CRYING OUT LOUD, SO WHAT IF IT ISNT POPULAR ANYMORE IT SHOULD JUST BE THERE, SO WHAT IF TORVOSAURUS IS ALREADY INGAME?
And what if we could, then what???
What if the world was made of pudding
Welcome to clone park
As if every animal in life isnt already quite similar to one another in some sense anyways, who cares if theres another animal that gets added into the game that is quite similar to another existing animal in the first place.....................
The people that want more unique animals care
In time they'll run out of unique animals, that ones for certain
Not before game dev ends lol
they'd need to have more than 10x the current roster to run out of really unique stuff
The abundance of the fossil record is astoundingly vast
That's just including terrestrial species
That increases another like 5 fold with the potential of aerial and aquatic species lol
true
It is mid all around
The only reason it got popular is edgy art featuring it as some sort of super scary primate predator hunting early humans and other stuff
it isn't even like "a long history of edgy art" either like the majority of it stems from one specific piece of paleoart
I am breaking my oath to never touch this thread because I will not tolerate dinopithecus slander
"big fucking baboon" is genuinely a cool enough concept on its own and we all know it
The "popularity" surrounding the one edgy art piece is specific to this server and it's based on a fucking copypasta/shitpost about how the piece was actually a reference to Saturn Eating his Son, the painting
By no means is it overhyped when it's only real claim to fame is showing up in ARK (which means nothing because they'll put fuckin anything in Ark these days)
Tropicola is a dinopithecus confirmed
Baboons are just cool
it doesn't have the "largest primate ever" factor of Gigantopithecus, it doesn't have the exceptional fossils and a unique appearance of subfossil lemurs, and it isn't even from a group that is entirely extinct like ancient basal primates would be, so what makes Dinopithecus so amazing as a primate species?
Baboons are easily the most unique of modern monkeys
It's a fucking baboon and baboons are cool
Who cares that it's not The Absolute Biggest
Like genuinely who cares
By that logic the only sauropod we need is fucking argent, skip the rest
Its like saying we can't have idk platybelodon because its not as big as palaeoloxodon
I would rather have baboon lemurs than regular baboons but big
Also Gigantopithecus size is highly overexaggerated anyway
It's not the orangutanzilla that Jungle Book 2016 makes it out to be
"Baboon lemurs" whatever that is, is not a baboon
It is still a big ape but like not much more than modern gorillas
Lemurs are cool don't get me wrong but they're not so special that you can just say "there's no point in adding any other primates when lemurs exist"
Lemurs are so different that both can coexist
Exactly
Yup yup this
Which is cool especially for a pongine
Of course it is overhyped. No one talks about it outside ark and being the scariest primate ever
No one talks about Moschops outside of Ark
Does that make Moschops overhyped?
What a silly argument lmfao
Archaeoindris slander
If nobody talks about an animal outside of ark I think that means the animal almost certainly isn't overhyped lmfao
You seem to misunderstand the definition of overhyped
^
"overhyped is when I don't like thing personally but others do"
T.rex is overhyped.
Nobody talks about anteosaurus period and yet people in this server never shut the hell up about it
And I say this as a guy who LIKES anteosaurus
You can thank Mammalia for that
All in all though I think it's really dumb to say an animal doesn't deserve to be included just because it's "overhyped" or something silly like that. It's even sillier to go "this animal should be included instead of more popular ones because it's obscure"
Reasons to add an animal is like one of those triangles
Animals being obscure doesn't make them any cooler, or better, or more deserving, and saying otherwise is, imo, childish
It feels like treating animals less like, well, animals, and more like fictional characters that can be ranked or whatever. Like, "that guy is overhyped" and "this obscure thing is more deserving". These were real life organisms, and they should be appreciated for their own merits, and not be made out to be "overhyped" just because many people find them wonderful or interesting
Lions are ridiculously popular, but that doesn't mean lions are not, themselves, cool and wonderful animals
Good way to look at it
Because with PK you do have to factor in some additional aspects, which are of course quality of remains/ease of reconstruction (because there needs to be enough to make a good design from- the artists have to start somewhere)
and yeah, marketability/popularity
again, it only happened in dino nerd community
doesn't appeared in anything else
Pretty much
big names do sell, like it or not, and that does mean things can skew towards the spectrum of "well known", simply because you gotta put dinner on the table, and about a billion more people know what a Velociraptor is versus a Tsagaan or whatever
That doesn't mean obscure animals can't show up, but y'know, it's a tradeoff, and there's only so much "bringing attention to niche/unknown animals" you can do before you start getting diminishing returns
But unknown animals are sometimes unknown purely because they just haven't had the fortune of a good marketing team, and can often be pretty damn unique. So adding them is a way to make the roster more diverse, compelling, and go "hey, we have some stuff none of the other guys have!"
So, like so many things in life, and even in nature itself, there's trade-offs. Popular animals bring in the dough, but you're less likely to have a monopoly on them. Niche animals can be unique additions, but they don't necessarily have the same marketability
I think a decent example might be the desert update. Dilophosaurus is hugely popular and easily a big name, update-selling addition, and scelidosaurus is far from the most obscure dinosaur out there, but it's pretty niche. Scelidosaurus adds a lot of unique traits to the list (small, primitive thyreophoran) but it doesn't necessarily have the draw that Dilo does. But since Dilo is in plenty of games, Scelido helps hold people's attention for longer, once Dilo has initially grabbed it
Adding a combination of both pays off really well
Juxia as an alt is another good example imo
I've seen a bit of it in "general animal nerd" communities but the overlap is significant, so yeah, I agree
A little different as its an alt instead of a bespoke animal but still
Anyway that is today's Tropicola PSA. Remember to appreciate all of nature's beauty for what it is, kids, and of course, happy building :)
-# (also Dinopithecus rules RAHHHHHH)
I fw this heavy
We need it as a roomie for iguanodon
Scelido goat
Chimps are still very complex, doing things like creating sticks for termite mounds and rudimentary tool use. The ai would need a major overhaul for australopethicus
Pentaceratops has even more differences
Tbf the same kinds of overhauls would need to be made for Giganto so
I wasn’t the one making arguments for Giganto though
That really means nothing in the context of the original discussion so I'm unsure why you felt the need to bring it up
Pentaceratops would be a better choice than Torvosaurus
Both have longf frills
But Pentaceratops is more distinct from Triceratops than Torosaurus
Do we have any Hadrosaurs?
No but you acted like Australo would be unique in that case, when all great apes would require those kinds of advanced AI
Oh, in that’s case my point extends to all great apes
Again, that really has nothing to do with the original comment so I fail to see the point in such a response
Just feels random to say "This one is better actually" when that isn't what the original comment was about
In the game right now? Yeah, quite a few
Anky and a Mongolian one (IMO Tarchia) for Ankylosaurids, Edmontonia (with alts) and Polacanthus+Gastonia for Nodosaurids is quite sensible IMO
Spicomellus
Scelidiosaurus and Carnotaurus are both in the same scenario too
found in marine formations miles offshore
and we have Scelidiosaurus already and carno is basically all but confirmed
Carno formation has actually gotten quite a bit of stuff in the last few years and we are about to see other 2 quite well preserved animals from the same formation (an hadrosaur and a parankylosaur)
Doubt any will make into the game, but still pretty cool
i’d quite like to see tarchia or euoplocephalus
Scelidosaurus also has cf. Material from Kayenta
toss in a parankylosaur too
Oh yeah
There's an abstract about the paranky, it's not too dissimilar from what we already know about them, but apparently the most noticeable differences from stegourus are the tail weapon and the skull
Maybe it has a chance as an alt
Ankylosaurus
Tarchia
Edmontonia longiceps/rugosidens + Denversaurus
Polacanthus + Gastonia
Stegouros
Maybe Struthiosaurus in a Hatzeg pack ngl
I wouldn’t mind Sauropelta as a third nodosaurid in some Cloverly or Early Cretaceous DLC theme ngl
Sauropelta is cool
The issue with Thyreophorans as a whole is that they are generally quite incomplete, AND the phylogenies tend to have poor coding, so relationships may be in flux
How different are osteoderms for edmontonia species
I am curious how hard it would be for them to make alt species taking into account different osteoderms and ontogeny
Denversaurus is pretty similar to rugodisens afaik
Main differences being in the skull and size of some osteoderms
There's weird stuff going on with the other one so not too sure
Not rugosidens
Longiceps
Horns and spike lenght pretty much
longiceps is the type species fwiw
rugosidens if split goes to Chassternbergia, because Bakker
Mhm
Without a nearly complete skeleton, I think it's hard to say for sure if the osteoderms were in the exact same spot for all 3 of them
FWIW, shamosaurine ankylosaurids could be neat down the line; proper ones, highly doubt Spicomellus is one
And then there's individual variation
So even if there were, we use one as base for the others 2
Which I imagine is either one of the edmontonia species
I imagine it would be hard for some thyreophorans to have alt since babes start with same model
I mean, Triceratops, plus baby thyreophorans were quite lacking in scutes anyway
Thing is when I look at baby scelido and anky all osteoderms are present from the start, which I suppose is necessary for them to grow together with animal.
So alt species would be using same configuration, but with different lenght or twists via ontogeny
Which makes me wonder how would it work for some thyreophorans
Where body proportions are similar, but osteoderm placement is kinda different
The predator
It would likely be rugosidens, because that's the one most reconstructions are based on
Saurornithoides sweep
It’s a really good Troodontid
I like Stenonychosaurus a tiny bit more but Saurornithoides has a really great and unique vibe
Do they?
Yeah
Why not both? We're already gonna have two dromaeosaurs, why not two troodontids
Looking it up they’re much more closely related than I thought so yeah that makes sense
I mean they are probably the two most different eudromaeosaurs from each other
Yes this is true and I know we have three but Microraptor is a special case because of it not being a regular habitat animal
Oh yeah that's another thing Stenon and Saurornith share in common, they used to be Troodon
It's not that simple
Yeah but so was Pachycephalosaurus lol
And really the only person who grouped Saurornith under Troodon is Greg Paul
But yeah I didn’t realize Stenon and Saurornitholestes were so close because Stenon has a taller skull that makes it look pretty different
Really the only missing eudromaeosaur (which Microraptor is not, by the way) of note is Deinonychus. (I guess Dromaeosaurus could would as a Utah alt)
Saurornithoides being from djadochta is cool
Yeah
It’d be a good companion for any of the current species (so long as you don’t have babies)
But Stenonychosaurus would add a missing piece to DP
Dinosaur prov. Park?
Yeah
And with troodontids possibly being omnivores (not sure what the current consensus is), it could eat fruits as well as meat
True
Add Pinaco and you've pretty much got what's needed from the site
WOOOO YEAH
Give me my beans
Live bolt cutter reaction
Yeah I'm down for pinaco
I can personally attest to this cause while I was volunteering last weekend I talked about Paradolichopithecus and they were really hyped about it but the name was so long they had no way of spelling it 
Like half the reason T. rex is so well known is that it has a super marketable name
Same reason why velociraptor overtook deinonychus
overrated 
explodes your bones
Osborn was good at two things: naming things and being evil
personally im more interested in other tyrannosaurs but i get why T.rex of all get so much attention.
Big boi
88 million newtons
What having a billion specimens and being the largest terrestrial predator ever does to a mf
Rex got well known because a mixture of Osborn's marketing for the American Natural History museum and for the fact it was the largest land predator without any real competition until like the 90's. Usage of T. Rex or T-Rex as a colliqual nickname is rare before that.
The shift from Tyrannosaurus to T.rex is a JP thing I believe?
Funnily enough Spinosaurus was described as comparable in size a decade after Tyrannosaurus, but Osborn proceeded to ignore it lol
The large and complete acrocanthosaur specimens are also quite recent
Osborn 🤝 the guy who refused to move the Spino holotype
Nazis w a grudge against Spinosaurus
Then again, Sue was found in 1990
I don’t think that’s true
For it's what it's worth, T. Rex the band did start in 1967 but they went under Tyrannosaurus Rex until 3 years later
Which part lol
Because part of that was a joke
Osborn’s refusal
Did he write about Spino?
Yep, past 1993 it is suddenly T.rex land
That's just book usage of course in english
Doesn’t look that sudden, there’s a clear trend towards it before JP makes it skyrocket
But yeah
Hell, the dub I watched of Jurassic Park consistently used Tyrannosaurus rather than T.rex
There is a trend after Jurassic Park the novel
The trend increases there but it was already steadily going up since the late 70s
This is in Spanish, in case you're curious
I’m curious if Paul used it
Though certainly less complete
T-Rex no spaces where
He does, he talks a lot at a species level and T. Rex is the proper way to write it.
Add "tiranosaurio" to the search as well
My dub was Galician but minoritarian language
Although the mentions of Tyrannosaurus include all mentions of Tyrannosaurus rex
I'm shocked that T-Rex isn't much higher
Dunno how often "tiranosaurio rex" was used in Spanish either, but, all in all, really noticeable spikes with JP and JW
I feel like that was the only spelling I saw for years as a kid
Then again people who spell it that way probably rarely feel the need to Google what it is
I feel like I saw all four spellings growing up, though I can't say which was more common. And of course, when spoken outloud, there's no difference between T. Rex and T-Rex. The data is limited to literature (including scientific papers) that Google has collected.
We need deinonychus and/or utahraptor for North American raptor rep
Leaning a bit more towards deino
we're getting Utah but Deino is too different and important to leave out
Hell, I'd wager even Dromaeo could sneak in
Dromaeosaurs had a long and diverse history in NA
And if we get deino, then those who build “ecosystems” in the game would probably appreciate tenontosaurus
I'd imagine Dromaeo could possibly work as an alt.
Tenonto is good with or without Deino
Tenonto is just neat
Would be dromeosaurus last minute alt then?
Like plateo gracilis
For Utahraptor I mean. I see mentioned sometimes
For who
Deino?
Dromeosaurus alt for Utahraptor
Lowkey sad kelenken, if correct is not getting alt
Then we can get full Phoraco
Kelenken, if correct, is still 2 years away, considering how much they change their plans I wouldn't count anything that far away as certain lol
I feel like they too different to share animations
By size alone I mean
Agreed
This guy
Also while Dromaeo is just a skull they probably had very different proportions
I mean some people believe dwarf palaeoloxodon could work as alt for giant one
Yeah but those are the same genus
Dromaeosaurinae is a total mess
Dromaeosaurus is the only one that’s uncontroversially placed in it
The adult p. flaconeri would be as big as the baby of antiquus I think lol
Technically speaking the proportions alone of falconeri shouldn't allow it to be an alt as we know them lol
Dude is like mastodon i believe
True
Antiquus for reference
I'll see if I can find a better image tho
There we go
Wouldn't be surprised if saurornitholestines were dromaeosaurines but Utahraptor wasn't ngl
Heresy
I'm hoping that we also see some prehistoric amphibians in the future, including Crassigyrinus and Laidleria.
https://youtu.be/YULv4J3obCo?si=ZgjGiVZ3pnCkExMO
Temnospondyls were a diverse group of early Tetrapods related to modern Amphibians. They originated in the Carboniferous Period, and became very prolific until the end of the Triassic. The last one known survived until the early Cretaceous.
Full Cladistics series:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGhcTch4iLE&list=PLsegyehPSkxqMXp5cZ4r7JBcp_OUX...
Crassigyrinus is more like a stem tetrapod
Looks weird, I'm kn
That makes me wonder, are alt babies of different sizes?
Time to go look

