#Community Species Suggestions
1 messages · Page 46 of 1
Oh that's interesting
I've seen it depicted with more muted color than usual before, didn't know it was this variable tho
that's not a great argument tbh, because a) just because we can only see chemical traces of one class of colour compounds does not mean other compounds were not present, and b) other pigments also have specialized and recognizable cell types and structures
I often forget how freakish psittaco actually looks like
I'm not sure what you mean
Borealopelta having chemical traces of pheomelanin is not more conclusive evidence of exclusively pheomelanin colouration then preserved pheomelanin melanocytes
I'm not gonna take his whole post and put it here, but he uses a diagram that helps explain this
can you just link the post
xanthophores and iridophores are not preserved in fossils
except they are
he talks about that one too, it's only preserved because of the method of fossilization which is not common
so phosphatized fossils could conceivably show color but as far as he indicates we dont have conclusive proof of such things in any mesozoic animal yet
though he does say some brazilian pterosaur sites are promising
actually that reminds me
is there a full list of every dinosaur we have coloration from or not
the only ones I know are Pssitacosaurus, Borealopelta, and a crapton of avialans and close to avialans like Microraptor
Psittacosaurus and Borealopelta are studied, but there's also a hadrosaur which Witton talks about as not really telling us anything except that melanosomes were there
besides that it's only feathered species
dont we have something from Tupan? I could be wrong there
oof
I know they aren't dinosaurs, but we do have quite few marine reptiles as well
Front of the crest is dark, back is light.
the feathers are more complicated
may be iridescent but only if it was in the same way as bird feathers which is really hard to say
it's very unclear if pterosaur melanosomes were more like those of birds or nonavian reptiles
there's evidence for both possibilities and more work is needed
also
his restoration of the crest looks sick and he says it's based on real data not just speculation
way cooler than basically just a big triangle
hopefully if it ever shows up in PK it'll have a shape like this
Suchomimus please
TBH give it alts with different crest shapes.
Damn I thought this was Nycto recon discourse
megarachne
The small vivarium for arthropods will go hard with those ngl
i feel like it would be oversized for those
yeah it is but
i feel like in a realistic enviroment it would be way more content in the larger vivarium
The fact 4x4 is still bigger than provided scale on image 😩
actually now that i think about it
an anomalocaris would fit snuggly in a 4x4 aquarium
this is apparently a large specimen
Remember that 4x4 meters is already into minimalist house territory
jeez i didnt know that my scale was that far off...
(im not mad im just shocked as hell)
Trilobite touching pool
Im sucking at english
😒
What u think of some bovid to put into game??
Rusingoryx at most
Aurochs
bison
for good mixed pleistocene habitats
latifrons and priscus
Bring me the bison
My problem with making a triassic wishlist is that it ends up being too big lol
Chinle needs its own DLC
same with Permian
honestly I think formation-themed DLCs would be a great way to set the game apart and give ways to add more content than just species.
like a Chinle DLC could come with a Western theme or some triassic plants
while I do think that is a good idea, we have no clue how many dlcs the game will be able to afford
for sure, this is all hopeful thinking
I think formation dlcs would only be a good idea if we have room for a large number of dlcs
otherwise it would be best to focus on a few dlcs that we will get the most variety out of
I also think formation dlcs should only be reserved for big, notable formations
a La Colonia DLC would be a massive waste of time lmao
yeah fr
Maevarano might actually be good though, lots of fun guys there
no one will be prepared for the peak that is the Tapinocephalus Assemblage Zone dlc 💯
Dinocephalians are peak
I just think that formation name is funny lol
TAZ
Upper i assule
assume
Upper TAZ has this
oh wait this is actually fire lol
all vertabrate taxa from the Subzone
i did this for the entire Karoo
ohhh ok
Lovely
Triassic Dinosaurs is easy: Coelophysis, Plateosaurus, and then the only animal we don't yet have is Herrerasaurus.
bruh
Honestly I would want more non-dinosaur triassics like Postosuchus, Placerias/Lisowicia, Desmatosuchus than Dinosaurs
yes absolutely
for a sec I thought you were going to say that the only triassic animals worth adding were dinosaurs lol
oh no lol
Dinosaurs in the Triassic didn't have as much diversity as later eras
For a second after you said bruh I thought I was about to hear a lecture on why 10-20 glupshittosaurs would be a valid addition
I do think maybe something like Eoraptor as a terrarium species could be nice, though the triassic has better species for that role that would add more diversity like drepanosaurs or sharovipteryx
Eoraptor i'm a take it or leave it. Herrera is better as it fills the size range betwee Coelo and Plateo better. I'd only want it if it's a terrarium animal.
mhm
Shringasaurus would also be goated
Yeah, Triassics should have some non-dinosaurs honestly, they were more diverse than the Dinosaurs of the era.
Herrera is definitely the only necessary addition dinosaur wise
Lessemsaurus or Liliensternus would be cool but not really needed
Eoraptor and Silesaurus tho
You're right I forgot Silesaurus
But in terms of non dinosaurs I'd want at the very least
- A phytosaur
- An allokotosaur (or two, with a habitat species in azendohsauridae and a vivarium species in trilophosauridae)
- An aetosaur
- A kannemeyeriiform
- A shuvosaur
- A rauisuchid
- A drepanosaur
- A tanystropheiid (preferably 2, one arboreal and one aquatic)
- A non-shuvosaur poposaur
- An erythrosuchid
- A traversodont
- A lagerpetid
this is assumining no fully marine species either
yeah, I said "an aetosaur" but I meant Desmatosuchus lol
Just like how I said "an allokotosaur" when I meant "Shringasaurus and/or Teraterpeton"
I do think a special mention should be given to Lystrosaurus as an addition
I was weighing that because it could be Triassic or Permian
Rhynchosaurs also make for good options
Hyperodapedon as a terrarium species maybe?
maybe Brasinorhynchus as an exhibit animal
Tbh i think with Rhyncosaurus alone it's enough
or perhaps a dlc named Triassic weirdos
Too big
Sure some of the left outs could be added on other dlcs but ehh
Make a Chinle DLC and then a separate more general Triassic dlc
no we the need weird of the weird , early Triassic Marin reptiles
So again
To not make It a 40€ dlc
Make a Chinle dlc
Then a separate general triassic dlc
You can't physical put all worthy triassic inclusiones in a single dlc
Hell even if you went only for the basic stuff It would already be a massive dlc
At least I can see this guy
First Atopo art i've seen with flippers tbh
Ah its eretmo
yes
Thought It was Nothofied Atopo ngl
But only from Chinle
This would be excellent in a vivarium animal
We’re already confirmed to get the only La Colonia animal worth adding anyway
okay, okay ... perhaps Chinle , and another one named marine Triassic weirdo
Postosuchus is not a marine reptile
yet
yeah , I got the idea
Wait until Posto gets recovered as a basal Thalattosuchian
It’s clade is paraphyletic anyway
Your mother is a basal thalattosuchian
Anyway I do think Chinle could end up dominating a Triassic pack but like
What's the chances we're getting a fuckton of Triassic weirdos to begin with
High
In an ideal world yeah we'd get a lot
Well define fuckton
Triassic is pretty much vacant in most games I must say
I’d expect like 8 late Triassic stuff besides vivariums
I could see that happening
10+ is pretty likely if we count all potential dlcs
That's where the issue lies
You're looking at the total potential
Which is vast, don't get me wrong
But at the same time, we dunno how far the devs want to take that kind of thing
In an ideal world we have like 5+ years of dlc
Western Europe had really a good collection of them
Well yeah but if we go super realistic we are gonna get 4 triassics for base Game and like 3 others with dlcs
Herrerasaurus, Placerias, Postosuchus, Desmatosuchus I feel are all reasonably guaranteed
If PZ told me anything then triassic even after 5 years wouldnt be completed or anything like that
We don't need to "complete" the triassic
Sad truth is that shit is gonna be left behind at some point
In a dream world we get Shringasaurus, Sillosuchus, Lisowicia and Atopodentatus
if we were to only get a single Dicynodont I would want it to either be Placerias or Lisowicia
And I have to wonder if a Triassic pack would be a high priority; recently extinct is seems to be at the top DLC of interest and then probably they'll want to see if flying/aquatics are viable
yet we are very likely to get giga as dlc
Non-vivarium Triassic additions
Herrerasaurus with feathery and scaly skins + Staurikosaurus alt
Eoraptor
Silesaurus
Tanystropheus
Placerias + Lisowicia alt
Desmatosuchus
Postosuchus
Saurosuchus
A phytosaur (Redondasaurus or Smilosuchus)
Erythrosuchus
Shringasaurus
Going purely by community interest sure
Lisowicia
We have no idea what the devs want to do tho
Tbh i think giga is inevitable merely for economic reasons
Probably so
They have no idea what they want to do either
I gotta be honest here
if we are talking about necessary additions from the Triassic and factor in that we likely won't get all of the groups we could ask for, I think Silesaurs are pretty low on the priority list. They don't really have much to them compared to the rest
Seemingly they make things as they come
The other half is quarantine
Doubt there's anything planned past a year after full release
Ornithosuchus woodwardi
Cynognathus crateronotus
Lotosaurus adentus
Proterosuchus
also using one of your few Triassic slots just to add a basal ornithiscian feels like a waste
With 20 animals per year at best and most of these being dinosaurs triassic is going to not have much additions probably
Bait?
Nah
Silesaurus is cool
We need more stuff in that size range anyway
Silesaurs are super unique and cool
That would be extremely lame if understandable from the devs
ok but are they cooler than Desmatosuchus or Shringasaurus
Vivarium additions from the Triassic
Sharovipteryx
Drepanosaurus
Gigatitan
Longisquama
Lystrosaurus
Thrinaxodon?
Where did 20 species come from?
Hyperodapedon
Thrinax is probably the fuzzy critter
Average number PZ is able to pump out per year
PZ
PK Will probably be like 8-12
Also according to the original post-EA list and what Mau has said, non-dinosaurs seem to be coming a lot more later.
And this is being very generous
Half the list was mammals and included the first non-dinosaur/non-mammal additions
Lystrosaurus is probably a weak vivarium creature since between Simosuchus being confirmed and reasonable speculation pointing towards Diictodon being within developer consideration Lystrosaurus has nothing beyond trivia going for it
Ehh
I could see like 15 including vivariums
One of the few times i would agree with Lystro merely by popularity
And i hate popularity arguments
Lystro should just be the smallest exhibit imo
Yeah with vivs that seems doable
I could see lystro if they go for one of the large species for a habitat animal
The more famous ones are smaller though
Not really
Small Lystro is only famous from Dominion
All other media uses medium or large lystro
I doubt any lystro species is particularly famous over any other
Diictodon better
Nah, I see murrayi being used the most
I mean if they wanna make it a habitat animal and only one species is of that size then that's what they're gonna go with lol
Who said they'd make Lystro a habitat species
Impidens
That's why I said if
I would pay that for a good amount of content personally
The better mini choice for dicynodonts is diictodon anyway
exactly lol
Qianosuchus would be cool tho
This funny, because you then realise that PK needs to at least repeat EA launch to even recieve DLC content, which means around 1 million in cash
Impidens is big enough to be a full size animal
this ?
That's debatable and honestly I don't see why they wouldn't go for the better known animal
Diictodon is also popular due to prior media appearances
honestly I'd be happy with either
Related to the ornithomimus like one ?
not super closely
poposaurs are INSANELY diverse
they come on shape and sizes
What about a tritylodont like oligokyphus
poposaurs were like this close to becoming dinosaurs before dinosaurs did
actually that'd be a fun specevo project
poposauroids surviving the Triassic extinction while dinosaurs die out
etjosuchus existed prior to the earliest dinosaurs, was bipedal and already had reduced forelimbs relative to other bipedal pseudosuchians like postosuchus
yeah but that's not a poposaur, and bipedal "rauisuchians" are less diverse in lifestyle than poposaurs
Fair
why would it be a vivarium animal
Depends on the species, but also burrowing behavior
though some dinos I'd want as full species were also probably burrowers (Thescelosaurus, Leptoceratops)
The type species, aka the most commonly depicted one, is small
that too
Also the only one that actually survived through the P-T extinction was small
Nope L. maccaigi was enormous and then the second largest species, L. curvatus, is known from both the Triassic and Permian
Both are animals the size of large pigs
There's genuinely no reason to put Lystrosaurus in a vivarium other than some weird attempt to stick to the type species which is already not a rule ingame
we already have burrowers as full habitat species
That graphic is not accurate
someone tried to use it as evidence last time it was brought up
The DeviantArt page that artwork is from even acknowledges L. curvatus got to 2.5 meters long lmao
we do?
Psittacosaurus
And it'd be super weird to leave out Glyptodonts and ground sloths just because they're burrowers
it does not say that at any point
Any mention of 2.5 meters is referenced to the genera in general and not the species in question
There is one good reason. Devs might feel lystrosaurus is not worthwile to be habitat and will be cheaper vivarium instead
Here is a paper going over the size of L. curvatus and that L. maccaigi's largest specimens aren't fully grown so it was even larger than we know
Definitely possible but IMO would be kinda sad, there's really no other Dicynodont as well known or well understood as Lystrosaurus
Hey look we finally got a skeletal for Spico
Thylacine would be an awesome animal to see on PK because today is the anniversary of their extinction 89 years ago from today
And this is why skeletals should be a must have in papers
the Thylacine is about as confirmed to be coming eventually as a species could be
it's just too iconic to leave out
I do have to wonder which animals they will use to create its noises
We need a Mud Wallow for Herbivores https://youtu.be/T3fKpRK-7s4
Reid Park Zoo's new African elephants enjoy their mud wallow in their new exhibit, Expedition Tanzania. Produced by Tucson 12.
The more I see of this thing, the more I like the idea of having it in the game
Yeah it is pretty cool
I would hope so; a recently extinct dlc would be incomplete without it
Thylacine and dodo are practically mandatory
mhm
The concept roster was pretty much perfect
Passenger pigeon would have to be vivarium
It wasn’t in the concept roster but it’s completely worthy imo
There's tons of birds to choose from
Rather unfortunately for them but good for pk players (the ones that truly matter)
Dodo, moa, and great auk are major ones
and elephant bird
Mahajungasuchus
Kauaʻi ʻōʻō
for RE options there's also Adzebills, moa nalo species, mole ducks, and Broad-billed parrots
Also something I feel like isn't discussed enough is having the Rodrigues solitaire as an alt for the Dodo
since the Dodo would likely only have a single alt, as it was only a single species
Agriotherium, the bear
Specifically the big one from africa
... Maybe the Atlas bear too
Okay definitely the Atlas bear for the RE DLC
No, not that I'm aware of
Might as well check something
Sub-family or something, Tremarctinae
Every other member of it is dead, except for the Spectacled Bear
Last representative
No idea if it counts as "Extant Species Representation" if its just one living representative
... Okay so Tremarctinae are a sub-family of Ursinae or something?
Whatever the case may be
I'm sorry but that would be such a waste
we literally already have a member of Ursus in game
other extinct bears would be so much more interesting than what would just amount to a brown bear that is only interesting because it lived in Africa
I wonder how Mau is going to fit all these RE animals with rather small budget in single DLC
Wouldnt be surprised, if pack is going to be just dodo, thylacine, moa, horse and parakeet + pigeon in terrarium
unfortunately that feels the most likely
at least a lot of the other species left out by such a selection could come later in an island themed dlc
you forgot the aurochs
I think cow is going to be free update animal
Take Agriotherium Africanum he wants to be taken
Neat grassland type bear
💯
A list of animals I think may be fun to add:
Mesozoic:
Phytosaurus
Purrasaurus
Stomatosuchus
Guanlong
Dakotaraptor
Cryolophosaurus
Imperobator
Concavonator
Irritator
Majungasaurus
Altispinax
Austroraptor
Maip (any megaraptor would be cool tho)
Armadillosuchus
Chitipati
Giganotoraptor
Monolophosaurus
Therezinosaurus
Pachycephalosaurus
Rhamphoryncus (exhibit animal)
Miragaia
Hesperosaurus
Chungkingosaurus
Nodosaurus
Sauropelta
Spicomellius
Tanystropheus
Longisquama (Exhibit)
Depranosaur (exhibit)
Cenozoic:
Terror Birds (Any)
Moa
Sivatherium
Bromatherium
Entelodont
Bison Latifrons
Auroch
Megatherium
Platybelodon
Hyaenodon
Quinkana
Megalania
Doedicurus
Andrewsuchus
Pygmy Mammoth (it’d be adorable)
Any prehistoric horse.
Dakotaraptor 
Pk could use turtle tho
one sneak
Can't personally find issue with any other listing, maybe Citipati due to it being ovi but again
Yeah maybe Citipati might be too similar. But Giganotoraptor may be better simply due to the size difference.
But we do have several species of Paittacosaurus & Parasaurolophus so
Chunky guy
That's a weird depiction
Bromatherium is an ancient relative of the giraffe like Sivatherium
ahh Bramatherium
if you wanted to add a huge mammal that was more likely one of the largest carnivorous land mammals then add Megistotherium
you mean Bramatherium
Yeah I gots dyslexia my bad
oh i apologize
Surprised no one asked about Tanystropheus
but fr though can we not add Dakotaraptor
if there were any dinosaur that I would be strongly against adding it would be that one
I just find him to be a silly lil guy
as I would with any other fragmentary species only popular because of stupid reasons
like Thanos
I’d be fine with any larger raptor species admittedly.
I've seen it being asked every now and then
Ahh
It also was more semi aquatic
So we could get it before fully aquatic species are added
yes but you know that Dakotaraptor is extremely dubious and tied to a controversial person
I did NOT know the latter actually.
Fwiw spelling is Gigantoraptor, and it's a super cool animal, and would be a more interesting Oviraptorisaur than Citipati
[Our husband has gnarly dyslexia so feel you there]
explaining this DePalma rabbithole is a bit out of my wheelhouse
I'm vehemently against "Dracorex" for, I guess tangentially? Similar reason
That and the fact it's a juvenile of either P. wyomingensis or P. spinifer
mhm
I’m mostly against it due to the research that it’s a juvenile Pachy honestly.
Considering it was named during a time before HP controversy I’m not gonna hold That against it.
I actually got to hold a ‘Dracorex’ skull while on a field trip once.
Yes, I did state P. spinifer. While Stygimoloch is a cool ass name, I'm hard up on it being a distinct genus.
But yeee thanks haha ^^
Would almost take immaculate postcrania to convince me
Good news everyone!
We're getting Utah
Would love to get bonuses with Acro, so holding out hope for Deinoc
But yeah, please don’t use my dinosaur suggestions as a judgement to my character. I was just trying to add some fun suggestions to a game I enjoy is all. It really isn’t that serious. I’d again be fine with any larger raptor species I just didn’t want to outright suggest Utahraptor because I kinda felt that was too obvious and- OH HEY WHAT YA KNOW!! Heck yeah!!
Oh, of course, wouldn't use your animal suggestions as character dissections
That's uncouth and for example - you may not know about something
Exactly yeah
As long as we can agree that until Jane gets her proper paper, "Nanotyrannus" is dead in the water
Hahaha yeah
Purrussaurus isn't mesozoic
Its Oviraptorosaur ftr
Oops.
In general adding some wild crocodylomorphs would be fun. There were some pretty cool Terrestrial ones.
Oh that’s cool
My b on that one
Kayentatherium as a vivarium critter
Oh! Sinomacrops would be an adorable vivarium critter
cracks fingers
Purrasaurus is cenozoic, not mesozoic.
As others point out, Dakotaraptor is a no-no
Imperobator is a the lower part of a leg that we don't even know what group it belongs to, just because it's in PP doesn't mean it's a good option
Altispinax is a broken piece veberates, so no and Conca fills in that spot already
Rhamphoryncus is too big to be a mini
Nodosaurus is better replaced with more complete specimen like Gastonia or Edmontonia
Spicomellius is fragmentary
Longisquama and Depranosaur[us] are interchangable
Quinkana is a mess with how fragmentary the remains are
Megalania is a just a bigger Komodo Dragon, there's more interesting extinct life
ok I agree with most of these but discounting Megalania is crazy work
there would be riots in the streets if the devs touched pleistocene Australia without including Megalania, also it is quite literally the best choice for an exhibit squamate unless we ever add aquatics
"living animal but bigger" is a no-no in my book and Varanus is already part of a living genera, and no I don't care about the fact we've already got three like that in PK; I wouldn't have included those species either
These make sense but Spicomellus is more or less as frag as argent and yet we have it, keeping in mind spico is a much more unique choice than Argent, and i'm sorry but saying Megalania isn't worth while is just dumb
dlcs aren't just for adding new species; they are also for making money and Megalania would automatically make any dlc pack it is a part of more successful
About spicomellius, it is kinda fragmentary, but it's an ankylosaur, how different could it have been proportions wise from the others? We have a good idea of what the armor looked like and thats enough imo
"let's not have argentavis, it's just a large andean vulture after all"
tbh it would be The big seller for an Australian dlc by far
It also gets brownie points for being normal kingdom (Varanus priscus after all)
once, again Argentino (and Carcha) have way more name power; if this was Therizino, I wouldn't agree with the inclusion but at least I would get it on that front
Interestingly enough, they recovered it as less basal than a lot of other stuff despite it being from the middle jurassic
Also
Its not that terrible come on
cute, too bad this is "prehistoric kingdom"
Okay let's not add dodo or thylacinus then
Objectively the worst argument i've seen a while
Name power is the worst metric to add something
lets add troodon formosus
it has name power after all
Its not the worst metric, but it needs to be backed up by something
Like theri is big and from a great formation
There's no denying that
Troodon has none
I still have no idea about the neotype but idc
I've higher standards for Ankylosaur material
Well
What it would have changed if it had better material?
Not much I bet
As I said, it's enough
And yet except for Borealo spico is a better and more unique than any of these
spicomellius would go hard
Name power is hands down the best metric for including something from a business point of view because that's what attracts sales
You also act like I would have included Argentio or Carach
Enjoy your 7 large carcharodontosaurs then
I wouldn't; there's better titanosaurs and Carchas
This is just sad...
All this post/thread is
The only large carachar with any real name power are Giga, Acro and Carachar
then why not add Megalania?
than why not megalania
it would be a habitat lizard too
filling an interesting niche
Like theres a reason species like megalodon and megalania should be added.
they are interesting for their clades
and are popular
using borealopelta lowkey isnt even a fair comparison here
borealopelta is lowkey more on par with the preservation quality of certain pleistocene mummies versus most fossils
just due to the fact its essentially entirely 3 dimensional and a huge portion of the body
Spicomellus is so unique and bizarre that it cancels out its mildly scrappy nature
Sauropelta, ???, Edmontonia, ???, Borealopelta
@shell sonnet look, I get it, you are enthusiastic about the game and the future species it could have. BUT, that does not mean you can go and be smug, police, and overly critique every single suggestion posted on this chat.
Its a list dump chat that the devs may take a look from time to time to gauge interest. If anything, you belittling everyone and putting your very subjective suggestions as the pinnacle of choice only discourages others from engaging on this chat.
Am I going crazy or did messages disappear from this chat
Deleted an unrelated and unprompted conversation
Ah lol
Cave lion is in-game and its barely even bigger
Not to mention Megalania is extremely popular
I think the chat already gave their opinion on it further above. Lets move on from that conversation
I will try to do that, but can I at least identify the ankylosaur skeletons for Plebb
I dont think calling other users plebs is doing any favors for you
I would drop it entirely
Ah I wasnt aware
You may on dms, lets drop this entire conversation like i said previously
Quagga but even lamer
true...
If we didn't have the cave bear, it wouldn't be a bad choice for a recently extinct pack
I mean i guess?
cave bears are at least culturally important
but idk even without cave bear there's like 3 other cooler somewhat recently extinct bears
yeah
and if we're talking recently extinct stuff then I feel like it's far from a priority compared to a lot of other stuff
like I'll shit talk the Quagga but it's iconic at least
Tbh even with the 2k years ago barrier i might take californian bear over atlas
I mean, I still dont think we'd need an Ursus arctos of any kind
It would atleast fit with other north american pleistocene fauna, same cannot be said for atlas since i doubt we are getting anything in north africa from the cenozoic let alone pleistocene
true
A lot recently extinct is going to be very similar to living animals; stuff like the Dodo is a rarity
I mean, is it?
They could do a Roman gladiator pack; north African elephant and the like
save quagga, auroch and ig american horses anything likely for RE is at the very least somewhat weird
I mean would be funny but i dont need a dlc with 4-6 quaggas
Yep, iirc 12-10k years ago
so why would they be in recently extinct
Actually 6k
They are actually pretty different
depends who you ask
specially when it comes to leg structure
to me they seem very good filler
not everyhting in a park should be a star animal
the absolute latest possible date recovered for endemic new world horses is roughly 900 years ago from a study of EDNA in Mexico iirc
I'm confused
that seems... unlikely
They have their own genus which is more than any of the current normal kingdom can say
however, the earliest fossil remains are from signifigantly later, about 10,000 to 8,000 years ago, whereas the more concrete EDNA records are from roughly 4000-5000 years ago in The Yukon, which I think are fairly likely
definitely agreed
I do think the EDNA records from The Yukon are somewhat likely, though
That would mean proto aztecs would have seen horses nah thats borderline impossible
Bluebuck, Steller's Sea Cow, Thylacine is different but otherwise kind of normal for Australia
what
I just dont understand how it connects to the discussion we were having
Thylacine is NOT normal
what?
Bluebuck ill agree was essentially just an antelope
Steller's Sea cow you can also make the argument for, despite its huge size
predatory marsupials of that size and appearance do not exist rn
but the Thylacine was not normal even for uhhh
Bluebuck i like again as filler, same with the american horses or panthera
australian standards
since iirc Thylacinidae as a family is super old and diverged from the other dasyurids during like the Oligocene
so they were very distinct
even from members of the same group
more distinct than even Numbats are from Tasmanian Devils and Dunnarts
thylacine was a weirdo yeah, the only marsupial weirder would have been its big cousin
?
T potens?
oh Thylacoleo
these do not look the same at all
yeah
definitely
also the ammount of convergence in Thylacines with canids is like almost absurd
the front half of their skeleton is essentially identical to canids
and externally speaking they were also very close in appearance
Australian standards are set by this little thing. If you're not weirder than that, you're normal. Also if you're not poisonous.
the platypus is an outlier not the rule
also comparing a monotreme to a marsupial is a bit unfair
if you were gonna at least compare, at least do it within Marsupials
as an example, heres a Thylacine vs Wolf skull
Platypus are not standard australian animals
this does also does not look like a thylacine
definitely some differences, but an amateur could definitely make the mistake
the fuck
Choose something more or less cosmopolitan for the standard
probably would be closer to a fox skull
the point is that calling the Thylacine normal in this context implies it doesnt stand out from extant fauna
which is objectively untrue
heres another one
They also shared the same curse as another canid
no matter how many quolls get mistaken for it
this time with Dingo also included
also, on that topic
poor marina wolves
I dont think thylacines are alive still
but I think like the only absolute way to be sure would be an EDNA study
yeah, I dont think that's REALLY controversial among serious people
Thylacines in Papua is like a 5% chance
and has anyone actually done a large scale EDNA study to look for them? or nah
probably a bit less
in Tasmania obviously 0%
but I definitely think that if anywhere it would be there
do we have evidence of them in tropical habitats?
It's the only place where they can tbh
I think EDNA studies in Papua and Tasmania could probably solve it once and for all, especially in Papua
problem with Papua is that the area is super remote
and I also dont know what kind of tech EDNA research needs, but its presumabley quite expensive
ye
they inhabited Papua New Guinea untill roughly 4000 years ago we know for a fact
but I think that to absolutely seal the deal for Tasmania, an EDNA study could benefit
definitely look into New Guinea though
unless they already done one and found no evidence
Kidna depressing that of the RE species they are probably the most likely to still be alive
I'm sure those sightings are as valid as people claiming they've heard the Ivory-Billed Woodpecker
at least in the United States
since basically nobody actually has looked for them in Cuba
The Cuban one is dead as well
and if so, not nearly as extensively as the US
I think they are still dead there too
Next one would probably be Auk? (with a massive descent in percentatge mind you)
if we are talking about the ones from the original RE pack?
Yeah
ye
even then the Auk is like 10000% dead
there havent even been like any reported sightings since the 1850's
hell, even Steller's Sea Cow had some supposed sightings during the 1950's
I remember the FG fool saying that Stellers are just "unlikely" to be extinct
Wait fr?
which were very likely just a whale
interesting
apparently
Could have also been a different manatee
Steller's lived in the Bering Sea
Are there manatees in Beringia?
There are no manatees in the arctic
other manatees are tropical
ok not the 50's but 60's mb
off the coast of Kamchatka in the Sea of Anadyr
in 1963 on a whaling ship
He also claimed that the Arabian ostrich is quite likely to still be alive, which like... just no
If its anything like that one boat encounter with a "Megalodon" when it most likely was just a Basking Shark...
which is quite far from where they were originally last known from
I think its almost certain it was just a random ass whale
I mean how much about stellers' range did we actually register
from subfossil evidence or historical accounts
historical accounts its literally just Bering Island and Alvikie Island
also hold on
I have a theory about this
the report mentioned Trunks
which is really strange
and wouldnt be expected
but what if it wasnt a Steller's Sea Cow, but instead a Beaked Whale?
and the "Beak" was misinterpreted as a trunk
not entirely sure how likely that is, but I think its a possibility
especially since Beaked whales are quite rare to see, even in modern times
That would be like the 3rd time ever where beaked whales were documented
Imagine if it was an Elephant Seal
also, Beaked Whales have been seen nearby, on Bering Island actually
chat what do you mean
theres literally 1000 observations on INAT
✨ Exaggeration✨
I have a more glittery version if you want
apparently theres an endemic species of beaked whale to the Bering Sea???
✨ ✨ ✨ Hyperbole✨ ✨ ✨
chat did I just solve this mystery
thats in the range of where the sighting was
Could just be a trick of the light
they said in the report they were roughly 20-26 feet long, these guys max out at about 18 or so
but definitely could have been a trick of the light
I wouldn't trust that much the account of people from a whaling ship from the 60's
although one other thing, apparently they were recorded in a group of 6
tbh this is just speculation at this point
and iirc beaked whales are solitary?
so maybe not
Could be a family unit
remember those australian guys said they saw like a 200 foot megalodon lol
true lol
Lemme guess, that was the boat encounter that people thought they saw a Megalodon but it was most likely just a Basking Shark?
Why?
Was it duirng the day?
Because they are diurnal migratrory whales so it seems very likely it was indeed a travelling pod
i saw dingo
People exaggerate all the time
obligatory 'dingo ate your baby'
A dingo really did eat her baby
im trying to actually get into the source rn
but ive only used Google Books a few times before
and this is old google books
k got it
will be back in a sec
OK
nah I think they just made it up so their boss wouldnt get mad at them for the boat getting messed up in a storm
ok chat I have no idea how to get into it
🥀
the sources are 50, 51, and 51
Steller's sea cow (Hydrodamalis gigas) is an extinct sirenian described by Georg Wilhelm Steller in 1741. At that time, it was found only around the Commander Islands in the Bering Sea between Alaska and Russia; its range extended across the North Pacific during the Pleistocene epoch, and likely contracted to such an extreme degree due to the gl...
on here
I cant get to any of them
Gosh darned Deepbeakedwhale industry, trying to cover up their criminal tracks.
Big beaked whale doesn't want us to know what they're up to😠
51 twice
?
"50, 51 and 51"
what are you talking about???
like legitimately what is your argument here
how does the existence of Platypuses make Thylacines a poor dlc choice
Stellers sea cow is the recently extinct animal I want the most
Mostly due to it being my fathers favourite prehistoric (or in this case historic) animal
We need Bramatherium
daily "we need" EZ post is here 😍
Daily "i need" one guy who wastes his time on my fcking message that means nothing and says: "we need EZ post is here"
I have Enough
Hope that i will be kicked by that my message higher
I hope for that
This must happen
im so confused
Where did I say that? Of course Thylacine should be in a RE pack.
Decent pick but I like Sivatherium a lot more
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WfajV1Q8l3s9w__c2azD7NfRLceRuNkVv4uXNdcgxCg/edit?gid=0#gid=0
I did a list of possible semiaquatic mammals , you can add any thing in the list
This is for terrarium
My bed I was targeting vivarium animals 😅
Not on the computer but Kayentatherium
Does Cynodonts count ?
You’re hoping… you’ll be kicked?

Perhaps the Triassic critter will be one
But "fuzzy" is very vague
It Can mean something is mysteries, doesn't indicate it had actual fuzz
this isn't the first time EZ has hoped that he would be kicked for whatever reason
Yes i am rly hoping for that
EZ you don't make any sense. If you want to be kicked out of the server then just leave it yourself. Asking mods to kick you is just being annoying on purpose.
yeah rage bait is literally against the rule
Thanks bye
and he left
I hope he comes back when he’s actually old enough to be here
He had some interesting ideas here and there
nah he will return no later than 2 weeks from now
People have been told to chill out about his posts several times
Leedsichthys and the underrated Gyrosteus would be nice to see if we get aquatics
Y'all will be hearing from me.
the Protemnodon, would be good
Ominous
Leeds is dope, hope we get it if we get to the aquatic stage
Inverse of short faced kangaroo lol
Why the long face
I need cenozoic australian rep so bad
True
Diprotodon my beloved
Just 2 is criminal
How many mesozoics could we possibly get from australia
Not counting aquatics and pterosaurs
Australovenator koolasuchus
And uhh
Idk
Probably, but their fossils aren't that common there
Or everywhere else for that matter
Unless they come from a great formation
Obligatory Megalania, I guess?
Defo, brittle bones Nicky looking ass
For cenozoic there's a lot
I am the dumb
Like I could say at least 8 all different from eachother
Wouldn't mind like Diamantinasaurus or something
One of the aussie titanosaurs has a really nice skull
Diamantina is alright
I don't care too much about it but it's not a bad pick
Ah I was thinking of Sarmientosaurus
Which is from SA, not Aus
But its closely related to diamantina
Oh neat
Especially for a sauropod
They could probably be alt of eachother tbh
Probably ye
Diamantina holotype isn't great, but there's additional material that we have images of
But I think they are waiting for a full description
There's a sort of "internet hypothesis" that I've seen around that Diamantinasauria were probably the most prominent "antartic sauropods" given both their distribution across SA and Aus + larger than average eyes + smaller size
Dunno if the idea has ever been published on but its a neat thought
Isisfordia, Confractosuchus
Never heard of them
Are they like from pleistocene aus or older
Winton Fm.
That would honestly make them rank way higher on my wishlist
Crocodylomorphs
Ah so cretaceous
Middle
Diamantinasaurus has a skull, not articulated but still quite good for a titanosaur
Interesting, I couldn't find one
Probably wasn't looking around enough
Oh its right there on Wiki lol
I feel dumb
Wow the diamantina page is extensive
Lol bad connection ninjaed me
Someone really likes this thing lol
They aight
I prefer other croc relatives tho
It’s one of the best known titanosaurs
Same, but they were first I saw
Huh
The beast
It’s really underrated
Impressive to have a skull rbh
Titanosaurs were doing so many things with their skulls we don’t even know half of the probable diversity a
Interesting how different that reconstructed skull is compared to Sarmiento
Sarmiento on the left, Diaman on the right
Nemegtosaurus is decided to be a diplodocid, Malawisaurus was trying to be Camarasaurus
how are y'all forgetting Kunbarrasaurus
w-what did victor mean with that?
Good point
You'll find out!
my most wanted australian dinosaur is Dromornis :)
Ours is Australovenator
Titanosaurs are like noasaurs in that we have barely any skull material but what we do have is only so helpful for reconstructing other species because it’s all so different from each other
There's the obligatory 4 main animals (megalania, procoptodon, diprotodon and thylacoleo) plus dromornis, palorchestes, thylacine, meiolania
That bigass snake
And that's not all
I like it because of how pretty jwe2 made it [also exposed me to it]
Australovenator is only like 3rd or 4th on my list of Megaraptorans I want tbh
It doesn’t have the BIG MEATY CLAWS
If we make it that far
Well I never said we were gonna get all of them together
Just cenozoic australia animals we could get
enough about most wanted who's your least wanted in PK
I said this in another convo but tbh I think Australo is important to include either as an alt to another megaraptoran or as its own standalone inclusion because Australia has zero other theropod options for this game (aside from birds ofc)
probably Dakotaraptor
Australo is cool I agree
Nanotyrannus too
hard to add an animal that doesn't exist
Repeat for Nano
I mean you said least wanted so
I think I've talked enough about who I really don't want in the game lol
Australopithecus
Yeah, plus not really purpose of this thread
🦓
sometimes it helps to know what people want to see less of
In general?
I want us to have like double our current species count before we get another ceratopsid does that count
I think I want less bigger giant species ingame because its hard to build habitats for them
Felt
sure even if i like them 
Same
I want at least another stegosaur
But also I struggle with shortstack enclosures
92 at launch iirc
Yeah hoping we get more guys somewhere between like Ovi and Ourano lol
if you want me to say which species I would want the least that both isn't disqualified and not an erroneous taxon then I would have to say the Pyrenean Ibex. Including it among any other RE species would feel like such a waste of dev time for an animal that, while it's sad that it went extinct, isn't really unique among its group. There are so many better options to include than it.
Yeah especially huge theropods. After Allosaurus I think we need more smaller stuff
yeah a bunch of RE animals would be hard to find interesting compared to everything else
i personally want devs to avoid adding glupshittos as much as they can
glupshittos are fine so long as they are like, extremely easy to make based off of already made animals
Some glupshittos are interesting tbh
the reason I am so against the ibex is because it is the opposite of that
Like desmostylus is cool imo
the reason glupshittos are called that is exactly because they aren't
he's not, in fact it would be a nice addition of a completely extinct lineage
For me glupshitto means not well known to the public lol
Like juxia is a glupshitto too technically, but it's an interesting alt for para
like im talking about animals like giga and maiasaura, or creaures that have nothing going on for them for gameplay and variety aside of being part of a wider ecosystem
U. a. californicus?
Maiasaura?
yeah adding them as alts is a good compromise
[U. a. nelsoni]
or the hundred of ceratopsians out there
when will the devs add ichnotaxa
those are probably the actual least wanted species lol
We already have Eubrontes
lol
I guess what I'm getting at is they probably wont add any extinct subspecies of Ursis arctos
Cave bear already fills that niche anyway
yeah
Another bear is enough imo
there are plenty of better options for other bears
Like quagga is also just a modern zebra but we don't have horses ingame so it's cool imo
short faced bear is pretty much the only other bear the game needs
quagga is also decently popular as an animal and can be the basis of other extinct horses if included
Yeah
And will be according to Mau
Arctodus or Arctotherium?
tarpan/wild horses are also a decent filler animal for ice age zoos
Also it's a cute starter species
Tarpan aren't real but yeah wild horses are cool for more pleisto rep
aside ice age animals quagga is as far as normal kingdom should go
@inner wedge
arctodus duh
We’re getting Recently Extinct DLC
(they'll probably be alts of each other)
ah ok
outside of quagga no other animals speculated for holocene dlc have living genus
^
^
and that one i guess
Also bison
Tho both the horse and the zebra have living species lol
i dont think bison will be in the dlc
No but post-EA
it's an ice age animal
The ice age is ongoing
Depending how you consider domestic animals
the ice age is coming
We’re in an interglacial period of the current ice age
I'll be honest I don't really get the hype for extinct Crocodylus species, there are extinct crocodilian genera that are more interesting.
Ftr Arctodus and Arctotherium's striking similarity is due to convergence
Just in an interglacial period :]
"Bear" and "Bear Beast"
while on the topic of potential species of living genera
Steppe hyena…
You said the yeen word
and?
Good enough imo
They are part of the same lineage of bears and I doubt they are more distantly related than juxia is to para
I think an extinct Crocuta species would be the last good choice besides Bison and Aurochs post EA and RE pack
god im so excited
Simply figured it was worth putting out there
What extinct crocodylus species are even worth considering over voay or hanyusuchus
Like if we get an extinct crocodilian, it should be one of them
In the RE dlc I mean
I have heard people mention one called like, thorbor-something?
Both the Paraceratheriidae and Juxia wikipedia pages are fucking depressing even by extinct mammal standards
well it's not that drastic of a convergent evolution, they're both bears
Or future dlcs with the same theme
Because they are so short?
Thorbjarnarsoni
this thing
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crocodylus_thorbjarnarsoni
it doesn't do anything for me
Crocodylus thorbjarnarsoni is an extinct species of crocodile from the Pliocene and Pleistocene of the Turkana Basin in Kenya. It is closely related to the species Crocodylus anthropophagus, which lived during the same time in Tanzania. C. thorbjarnarsoni could be the largest known true crocodile, with the largest skull found indicating a possib...
You know it's bad when the parapropalaehoplophorus page in my language is longer than that
Yeah idk
What's your native?
I get Korea vibes, idk why
Its only really notable because the large size and short snouts were gained independent of each other
Both are tremarctine bears yeah
It's the Gurren Lagaan I think
Won't say because I'm mysterious
But central europe lol
I hope the short faced bears in game use sounds from spectacled bears, they make some strange noises
https://youtu.be/bbjhYYithco?si=Eij5dp3D2UIDJDdJ
We fed the spectacled bears at CERZA, but female Tierra wasn't too happy that Balu when he wouldn't share his food with her. She sounds like a TIE FIghter from Star Wars when angry!
Not german or french tho
Big monitor lizard
FUCK
HOW DID I FORGET VARANUS PRISCUS
ok so is the list now:
-Cave Hyena
-Aurochs
-Steppe Bison
-Megalania
for good new inclusions to the game of extant genera?
I guess you could also add Pachycrocuta to the mix depending on what happens to it, I remember hearing talk of Brown Hyenas being living representatives of that genus
yeah it's bothering me
I think haast eagle?
are we forgetting any extinct Canis species?
Pretty sure it's from a living genera
Haast eagle is good one
Pouakai would be good but I have my doubts that we will ever see it included
that would require a flyers dlc
and we dont even know if aquatics are on the table
Mmmh
Dwarf hippo
oh yeah those were of living genera weren't they
Some animals from the La Brea Tar Pits would be awesome to have as well!
- Aenocyon dirus guildayi
- Camelops hesternus
- Camelops minidokiae
- Capromeryx minor
- Equus ferus occidentalis
- Mammuthus columbi
- Miracinonyx trumani
- Nothrotheriops shastensis
- Platygonus compressus
- Teratornis merriami
Those have plenty going for tho em
tf is a camelopa
Maiasaura isn’t my personal fave but it is a unique animal compared to what we have
Is it
Yes
We have no saurolophines outside of edmontosaurini, which look very different from the rest of the group
It wouldn’t be my pick (Gryposaurus, Saurolophus, or Brachylophosaurus would all be better) but it’s not like any other hadrosaur we have
I'm sorry, autocorrect is being funky again
dinisaur
Retrosaur statues...........................................