#Community Species Suggestions
1 messages Ā· Page 22 of 1
I know, triple alt split
No what you really want is Pectinodon
I don't think so
I do think so
Pectinodon is a tooth taxon that basically says "this clade was at Hell Creek too"
tooth taxon
Tooth taxa
Tooth taxa, hell creek 
this fr
pov: you watched Prehistoric Planet
Damnnit, jedi mind tricks don't work over the internet
It's in PP?
Prehistoric Planet was good at representing biodiversity, but the name fixation paleo fans have leads to weird declarations of favouriteness
yeah
Hunting "Stigynetta"
I confess I have not watched most of PP
I haven't watched any of it
Easy to solve, Apple TV's free trial is easy to exploit
which is funny as php has stuff like the mongolian titan
Not everyone has time or energy to sit and watch series
but people obsessed
I swear most of the PHP requests here are solely because of PHP
over names
Better than arguing on the internet lol
barbidactylus longrich taxon š
Is that not what we are doing
That's why taxo-centric papers are just pretensions of opinion
Isn't every paper taxo-centric?
Barbaridactylus is neat in that it showed nyctosaurs surviving to the K-Pg, same as Tethydraco for pteranodontids
also it is martill taxon š š
But, if you want those clades represented, go with Nyctosaurus and Pteranodon
like it is a cool animal which shows nyctosaurs and kin survived to the K-Pg
but name wise and fossil wise it is nothing.
but it is cool showing maastrichtian diversity
Pteranodon > Tethydraco
Nyctosaurus > Barbaridactylus
Quetz lawsoni > Phosphatodraco
Pretty much
this
Still really weird how jwe2 added Barbari instead of nycto
PP
The dlc was released like around php
is probably the answer
Like genuinely
I have this conspiracy theory that it was a last minute edit to some other pterosaur
Then again, Late K is probably the worst selling DLC
they saw the femboy barbi memes and popularity of it during php and wanted in on the action.
Kek
I'm sorry, the what
D-dubious š³
the sneaky male barbi memes
Elasmosaurus > Tuarangisaurus
Tylosaurus > Kaikaifilu
Albertosaurus > Nanuqsaurus
Citipati > Corythoraptor
Euoplocephalus > Anodontosaurus
there was scene in the doucmentary where there is male barbi who instead of fighting has a smaller crest and acts as female mimic like ruffs
Tylo is a v good choice, I'd even take it over mosa
Shoutout to WWD for just not declaring species sometimes
Garter snakes or cuttlefish for ruffs fun fact female ruff birds are possibly attracted to male homosexuality. And males who mount faeders the female mimic ruffs mount them as they do with other males. Implying they know faeders are males.
Humans also do that
Yeah, M. hoffmanni or T. proriger is a good Mosasaur rep
some species have different types of males like ruffs and side blotched lizards. Side blotch lizards each male uses its own strategy yellows are sneakers, reds are agressive and live in harems and blue are chill and tend to look after one female.
Wouldn't be opposed to attenboroughsaurus, depending on its preservation
Though female side blotches seemling prefer males with colors that are rarer that year.
the fossil is gone but the cast is pretty good
though I wouldn't go with it given there are better pilosaur reps
iād like rhomaleosaurus more ngl
Let me guess, Munich, 1944?
Corythoraptor is likely Citipati's direct descendant anyway
actually u-boat torpedoed its transport ship in '41 or '42
Close enough
rhomaleosaurus is more unique, more complete and fits the basal pliosaur guy well. At least I think rhomaleosaurus is a basal pliosaur.
Geosaurus giganteus or Dakosaurus maximus
Ichthyosaurus communis/anningae
Pleisosaurus dolichodeirus
Kronosaurus queenslandicus
Mosasaurus hoffmanni or Tylosaurus proriger
Dunkleosteus terrelli
Basilosaurus cetoides
Leedsichthys problematicus
Pterygotus grandidentatus or Jaekelopterus rhenaniae
Parapuzosia seppenradensis
Minis
One species of Aspidorhynchus
Gebrayelichthys uyenoi
Henodus chelyops or Psephoderma alpinum
Stethacanthus productus
Tullimonstrum gregarium
That covers quite a bit of diversity
EZ learns consequences for spamming random species names (Circa 2025, Colorized)
Iād add like like megalodon and another cetacean
I'm going by the logic that the max is ten
maybe some āmid sized fishā like xiphacto
If it were to me, for plesiosaurs I'd go with Plesiosaurus, Rhomaleosaurus, Pliosaurus, Elasmosaurus, Aristonectes, Dolichorhynchops
Total, down the line
Cryptoclidusā¦
I like Xiphacto and Elasmo amongst others, but I don't have room for them
Benson & Druckenmiller (2014) has it outside of Pliosauridae
Cryptoclidus and Leptocleidus are cool too
Pilosaurus over Krono, shame on you
Yeah this a good list maybe liopleurodon because smaller plio and because of wwd. With plio or krono for true big guy
Pliosaurus covers with multiple species quite a bit of Thalassophonean diversity ngl
plio or krono Iād donāt care which is added they both would be good choices.
Dunk is obvious - what do you think of O. megalodon joining the fray?
plio has a lot of species.
You gotta have meg imo
The thing with Plio is that it is an in-between Lio and Krono in most regards
And the different species cover the size range
not a fan but am I already at my ten animal limit anyway
Not having Meg is like not having a mosa
Obliquis is also an option
Meg is just "big shark" to me, sorry I think that's boring
T. rex is just ābig theropodā to me
Like cmon itās one of the most iconic extinct species ever
it is a cool animal and big shark is the point. It is like saying rex is big theropod
Cave bear is just ābig bearā
Rather get Helicorpon or Aquilomops first for shark like animals
Also, single mosa and single ichthyo are disservices lol
I don't really care for that either
rex and meg are like extremely popular and meg is not just a big shark it had cool ecology
That's reasonable honesty
icthys especially
big therapods don't exisit anymore, sharks do
like no shoni, no temnodonto
Shoni Ichthyo Eurhino Temnodonto Ophthalmo
Leedsichthys
Once again, my list is trying to make the most with a ten animal limit
Depends on if you consider an Ostrich big
Ostriches are by definition megafauna
I like leeds but meg before it
Which definition?
they're massive enough
you canāt have an aquatic pack with out meg really these days.
like yes it is a big shark but it is THE big shark
I can and would
The 2 ostrich species are the sole clear megafaunal living birds; emus, both northern and southern cassowaries, and the emperor penguin skirt the line with individual variation
I still stand by C. granulata and/or M. gigas
C and M being?
Thanks
I could see mosa and meg getting four skins despite meg being a shark. Like one brownish grayish, one whitetip laterl striped skin and one blue skin and an alt.
More than a single Otodus species
Yeah there are a lot
Tylosaurus has plenty of species for use as alts
like a skin like this I really want
shark sharks may be dull especially pelagics but there is suprisingly a lot to work with.
with patterns
Mosasaurus has a few species too
Look if I want a shark like animal, I'll throw my support on Aquilolamna milarcae or Helicoprion bessonowi
Ichthyosaurus with dolphin and whale skins
Helico my disaster child
the ācolorfulā meg skin could be like this
You can have both but meg is like rex
it would be in the top ten of species added
realistically
First meg hater Iāve come across
Not hate, just thinks it's overrated
āErm itās just a big sharkā yeah? And? Itās badass as hell itās a 60 foot long shark thatās cool and thatās why people like it!
I mean youāre entitled to your opinion
Just think itās odd
it is like hating rex ngl
No prehistoric animal is overrated imo
like a large generalist species not even genus if shark which lasted a stupidly long time and was the apex predator of its repesctive ecosystem
also was a otodontid species which are a family of fully extinct lamniformes sharks
Wasn't Meg more of a whale specialist?
recent studies show it was generalist
and had a broad diet
it did eat whales though
Maybe even ate marine sloths
Look "living animal but bigger" is a type I prefer to avoid at the moment. If we got over say 25 marine animals, then yeah, I think Otodus delivers a slot. But we're not there yet at all. We don't know how PK much support will get after launch. And if I'm forced to select only ten animals for the marine list, I'm sorry but "big shark" doesn't pass
That would be part of the recently extinct pack, and I'm more relaxed there about size mostly because there's not a lot of good options
Easily could replace SSC too
holy shit we're all megafauna
what would you consider to be an appropriate mosasaur roster
You're entitled to your wrong opinion
We should have hoplitomeryx
Its needed at this point
Game can't keep going
Without hoplitomeryx
Synthetoceras, Syndyoceras,Kyptoceras ALSO
Mosa and Tylo already represent insane diversity due to parallel evo; a small halisaur would work well, and ttbt Phosphatosaurus brings more to the table than Halisaurus. Plioplatecarpus then fills the size range in between and has a different approach to mobility. Aigialosaurus as a mini also works well.
Phosphatosaurus isn't a mosasaur, do you mean Phosphorosaurus
Megalodon sucks. Just a modern species but larger. And it is kind of bad anyway? Like. It didn't live with anything but marine reptiles and fish, but it'd have to be a mini exhibit or even exhibit decoration. It is probably the most complete animal I've seen in suggestions yet, so that's good. But no, I am going full crabbucket veto. If Megalodon, that stupid fucking Jurassic clam, gets ingame, I am refunding the game.
š¦Ŗ
...Jokes aside tho, I am definitely not a fan of Megalodon the shark either
This might be a shock to our more juvenile members, but not all of us are preoccupied with the giantest carnivores evaaaah, lack of interesting features be damned
Otodus megalodon being differently shaped from your average chunky lamnid makes it more interesting, going by a recent paper
Megalodon clam would be a good exhibit decoration/mini exhibit
For the sole reason that it is a clam
Long Megalodon is a funky shape which is like. Neat.
But I still do not really care for it
Yeah, memes aside, I would definitely not mind Megalodon (clam)
Although wasn't long Megalodon replaced by a Sandtiger like condition recently, too...?
I do like Sandtigers but a sandtiger the size of a truck would just look stupid
I feel like any reconstruction of Megalodon shouldnāt just be a scaled up modern shark
Damn, don't let the Megalodon fans hear that one
It IS a modern shark
Unlike stuff like Hybodus, which is less of a shark than rays are, or Helicoprion or Stethacanthus, which are ratfish line animals
Otodus is a clear lamniform
wish we had Aquilolamna's teeth
not to mention that we can barely house great whites or even makos ethically in captivity for more than a few months
Damn, I didn't realize the fact that Otodus as a genus survived until recently meant it was identical to a different shark, but bigger
Are all Otodus species identical to the same modern shark genus or does it wary from species to species?
Otodus is taxonomically speaking a modern shark
in that it clades with 90% of modern sharks and isnt particularly basal
Reading comprehension is a skill that can be honed with practice
despite having existed since slightly after the KPG iirc?
so housing megalodon ingame would be unrealistic for one, but thats not that big of an issue, but I think a lot of people would struggle to make good habitats for one
I think I would for sure anyway
They literally commit toaster
Yeah, but it is wasted if spent on your snide comments
no otodus just is a true shark
a true crown group lamniformes they are all extinct.
I mean, that applies to the tiger shark as well, by the looks of it
they coexisted with modern clades
During the cenozoic like many of the sharks we have today coexisted in some form with meg. It is true crown group shark unlike hybodus and heli.
true sharks appeared in the jurassic
Oh my peak
meg is an extinct lamniforme shark from an extinct family
Didnt know sharks could look like that
No need to be a dick about it
With an outlook like that, it's no wonder you keep stepping into this many rakes
Cetoxyrhina and Otodus are closer to white sharks (makos and porbeagles inclusive) than any other living shark
no lemon shark and thats very debatable
It's just factually incorrect
Itās not but okay
they probably had body similar to lamididae their closet relatives but meg specfically may have had a rorqual esc body
being longer but still great white esc like blue whales are long
Remind me again, the Sand Tiger Shark is the closest living relative of the only living Mitsurkinidae representative, the Goblin Shark, right?
You canāt be factually correct or incorrect about how much a prehistoric animal is liked and whether or not it deserves it and if you think you can beā¦uh touch grass I guess
sand tigers arenāt that related to meg and have a different ecology to meg.
iirc no
goblins are the sister group to all the other lamniformes
I wonder why people say they are closely related then
Could it just be that similar jaw thing?
Damn seems like nobody else here reads papers on boring old "Big Shark" either
Lame
And would have different proportions. Meg would look like true lamnididae sharks maybe longer
I do I like sharks
I read papers on them and meg is a cool animal
Damn, so much salt and a Iām not even involved
Ironically salty cuz... Y'know
Meg being big shark is cool.
Saltwater talk
I donāt know any lamnididae that are over 11m longā¦
Whale sharks maybe
Upscaled great white is meh, but the animal appears to be more interesting than that
I'm pretty sure Whale Sharks arent lamniformes
Stepping on rakes is indeed pretty lame, and entirely preventable lol. Not like you only do it around me either, so your claimed "Nyeeh I just don't like to read your mean mean comments" doesn't really check out either š
Also megs ecology, body shape, taxonomy, and lifestyle was pretty unique
whale sharks arent lamniformes no
Whale sharks are carpet sharks I believe
whale sharks arenāt lamnids
Ok
yes they are I think
I'm not sure if the Basking Shark is a lamniforme, so correct me if I'm wrong
It is, closest living relative of lamnids
megalodon would be recognizabley a lamniforme shark
Was about to ask about Basking Sharks too. Not sure they get above 10m long either tho
So no over 11m lamniformes unless Basking shark is
it would look a bit different sure
(lamnids, white sharks, true mackerel sharks; great whites, makos and porbeagles)
Eh
but it would look like one
just a lot bigger
It would lack the nictating membrane, bonafide lamniform
Wouldn't look weirder than goblins or megamouths
I feel like yall are having enough fun talking about Big Shark that the discussion would survive moving to #science-chat at this point
There are only 3 extant genera of Lamnids
ok jesus apparently the largest ever recorded basking shark was 12.27 meters long
So. Shoo, shoo. Scram, kids
Meg is like big lamnid though possibly from a recent study could have had a longer body rorqual esc
think of blue whales and sperm whales
though that is heavily debateable
Fish size range be silly
either way meg is a cool animal
Move to science chat please
How about some Extinct Freshwater Sharks?
And sharks are about the most K-strategist fish and are born large, but, if given room to grow, they WILL grow
If any have been found
This is species suggestions
also it is mentioned in pk multiple times in merch and in staff application
Extinct Freshwater Sharks are cool. I believe Orthacanthus was a freshwater shork?
So there are some Extinct Freshwater Sharks
Thereās lots of prehistoric freshwater sharks
Which of them are the most popular and well known?
theres a lot though not all are true crown group sharks
Probably Orthacanthus on account of that being the first one that jumped to mind for me
Uhhh I guess onchopristis is technically a ray so
And rays are the closest relatives to all sharks
Xenacanthida are fun
Orthacanthus is less famous these days but I believe it was a mainstay-ish around the pre-dinosaur renaissance era...?
Mosasaurus
Tylosaurus
Halisaurine
Plioplatecarpine
hmmm
they survived the permian fun fact and one species is in chinle
Fun fact they are not crown group sharks
Iād be fine with one species of mosa in base game but further down the line I wouldnāt mind seeing something like tylo, globidens, phosphoro and plotosaurus
I'd personally swap out the Plioplatecarpus for the absolute crunchster Globidens
though I call them sharks as are hybodontids as if they were alive today Iād imagine theyād be classed as sharks and rays in that timeline would be sharks
rays are closer to sharks than they are to sharks
And Aigialosaurus is neat but I think Dallasaurus could be a better smol mosasaur
maybe globidens or a similar cruncher.
Mosasaurus
Tylosaurus
Phosphorosaurus
Globidens
Dallasaurus
Are there any known Mosasaurs that were found in trench-like environments?
no
No ploto is unfortunate, heās underrated
that is too deep for even whales
No because they need to breathe air
Like their deeper sea mosasaurs and plesiosaurs
Plotosaurus to me is the yin-yang of Cymbospondylus ngl
abyssosaurus is a plesiosaur adapted for deep water but none could survive in a trench
Yep. Mosa trying to be an icthyosaur fr
or that deep they breathe air
oh yeah cymbo would be neat
I love some utterly random smaller Mosasaurs (Platecarpus, Globidens, Phosphorosaurus etc) but I feel like only Mosasaurus or Tylosaurus at first might honestly be enough, since marine crocs and some of the popular Ichthyosaurs kinda fill a similar niche while having a similar body structure
I'd rather get a large ichthyosaur like Temnodontosaurus than a Cymbospondylus because cymbo is just an ichthyosaur that looks like a mosasaur
The same goes for Plotosaurus
I'd rather get another large mosasaur like Tylosaurus instead of Plotosaurus cause ploto is just a mosasaur that looks like an ichthyosaur
I agree, I said before is honestly be fine with just mosa in the base game considering how many cool marine reptiles in so many different clades there are
I would absolutely love some weirdos down the line too tho like uh. What was that one trying to be a humpback whale called again
Okay serious question for everyone: you've got ten slots for marine animals. Fill them in
Only reason I asked about "Deepwater Mosasaurs" was because of Prognathodon n such
Some game has em spawn directly inside a trench biome
- Mosasaurus
- Plesiosaurus
- Ichthyosaurus
- Elasmosaurus
- Temnodontosaurus
- Globidens
- Basilosaurus
- Literally any thalattosuchian
- Archelon
- Hesperornis
They would 100% have developed that shape if they didn't go extinct 25 million years after going to sea
Archelon
Basilosaurus
Dunkleosteus
Elasmosaurus
Ichthyosaurus
Mosasaurus
Otodus
Pliosaurus
Dakosaurus
Jaekelopterus
Oh dear
Yep
- Archelon
2, Adopodentatus - Plesiosaurus
- Hesperornis (or literally any extinct penguin)
- Itchthyosaurus
- Dunkelosteus
- Mosasaurus
- Dorudon
- Jaekelopterus
- Pliosaurus
mine is basically the same maybe replace one with parapuzosia
tried to avoid big things since most zoos do not have large marine animals for a reason
Sad I had to cut him
Alright I'll go for a devonian theme of marine animals
I just want a cephalopod
it depends on how we define 'big animals' in this context
I tried including at least one big marine invertebrate tho I could have easily chosen another marine reptile
I think that maybe a zoo would have a singular large mosasaur as the 'star attraction'
something that would fit the cetacean archetype
anything smaller is what I would priorotize over big stuff
I think pk will have unrealistic marine animals as it is literally implied in the staff log
since anything larger than that becomes extremely expensive to keep
they definitely will and I dont see a problem with that
also pk has stuff like sauropods would would be an upkeep nightmare
I grow weary of "no cetaceans in zoo games" crap surrounding Planet Zoo
Gimme my whales in virtual tanks
Limiting your roster to realistic marine choices is a fools errand tbh
I personally just dont see myself using them hence why I didnt include them on my list of 10
I never really liked that as I donāt think people who donāt like cetaceans in facilities would play a zoo game
I dont see a problem with them being added I just personally wouldnt use them since I like to build realistically
if I made a zoo game I would make it unrealistic and have sperm whales and stuff
your limited to minis at that point really
Yeah pretty much
you now know the pain of Minecraft players not receiving any charismatic megafauna because Mojang gaslights themselves into thinking their game actually might make kids think incorrect thinks about wild animals
no sharks because endangered pisses me off
Ten Marine slots Lets go:
(Utterly self indulgent Wishlist version):
Aristonectes, Serpentosuchops, Platecarpus, Megapterygius, Perucetus, Atopodentatus, Leptocleidus, Styxosaurus, Dinocephalosaurus, Pezosiren
(Animals that realistically have an actual chance to be included version)
Basilosaurus, Plesiosaurus, Shonisaurus, Tylosaurus, Nothosaurus, Ichthyosaurus, Orthoceras, Jaekolopterus, Dorudon, Cymbospondylus
Realistically I think a very small mosasaur (within the 4 meter range) is about all a zoo could handle irl
it goes beyond that
Tylosaurus
Ichthyosaurus
Plesiosaurus
Liopleurodon
Cambrian aquatic invertebrates
Basilosaurus
Shonisaurus
My list of marine animals off the top of my head
iirc the reason no sharks there were was because they dont want to add hostile IRL mobs
because you added giant saltwater axolotls who kill laser guardians
silverfish
thats entirely fair
but the silverfish ingame also look absolutely nothing like IRL silverfish
literally destroys that point all of minecrafts animal mobs are unrealistic
although you can definitely make an arguement for spiders
I was surprised silverfish are real
mhm
if Mojang adds an animal that can be dangerous to a person they're afraid of two things. If they make it neutral/passive they think it'll teach kids that it's safe to approach it so they'll do something reckless. If they make it dangerous they think that this'll teach kids that they MUST go kill the animals IRL
this is stupid
my point is, video games shouldn't limit themselves
last thing, they could just add like a passive shark or something
but limiting your roster especially for an animal game with dinosaurs like sauropods is just limiting
PK should add as many giant aquatic animals as they want
like a nurse shark or basically any carpet shark
most of the extinct fish we know of in the past are pelagic or would not do well in captivity
Ichthyosaurus would do well though right
You are not keeping a xiphactinus or a mosasaurus or most plesiosaurs
possibly it depends
We have no idea
there are some open ocean fish in aquariums though, but they're work less well than kelp forest and coral reef animals
Actually if I look at most peoples list none of animals could be kept or we would never know
If Ichthyosaurs are deep sea divers, they probably wouldn't do well. If Ichthyosaurs are nocturnal, they'd probably do okay
socially no
Iirc we have evidence ichtyosaurs probably werenāt social and were pretty nasty
I know
So not really
Ichthyosaurs do have those gigantic eyes that indicate they thrive in low-light conditions
They kinda just look vaguely dolphin like and are similar in size
Size doesnāt matter really for species
we have the means to keep dolphins in captivity so we probably can also keep Ichthyosaurus
Ichthyosaurs and Sharks and Dolphins, oh my
we struggle to keep sea snakes in captivity and ceratin turtle species.
you are not having a leatherback in captivity
not all dolphins though
Well it does eventually, I donāt think any aquarium would wanna house a 30 foot xiphactinus etc
hey so uh
narwhals are complete messes
I feel like Ichthys would do better than dolphins in captivity... Again. Assuming they don't do deep sea diving.
I meant for small animals
how do they sleep
pretty sure we do keep Hydrophis platurus in aquariums
One ichthy was maybe nocturnal, as a whole I donāt most were
Ichthyosaurus itself
They have massive eyes, mostly? Adaption to low light conditions?
I donāt think we have any evidence it was nocturnal
Ophthalmo does I believe
- Dunkleosteus
- Antarctilamna
- Cladoselache
- Icthyostega
- Orthaceras
- Hynerpeton
- Titanicthys
- Phacops
- Ptyctodus
- Pagea
Devonian theme by the way
But I hadnāt heard that about ichthy itself
okay but if we assume that Ichthyosaurus was nocturnal then does that mean it slept during the day
I guess they could just do that thing dolphins do where they're just always awake and use their large eyes bcuz they didn't evolve sonar/jacobsens organ or whatever it was called
...Well. Technically dolphins still sleep just like
Only with half of their brain at a time
Potentially
for prehistoric animals one they are dead captivity is irrelevant in a game with cloned dinosaurs. Many of the aquatic charistmastic creatures and ones which would be full roaming are animals which probably would die in captivity or not do well
Idk why we would assume that but IF we did Iād guess theyād just do half sleeps? Like how cetaceans do
Now I have many questions about how marine reptiles slept
closing their eyes
Depends
I mean its either half sleep or waking up every time they get close to needing to breathe
some sleep like dolphins other just sleep. Also some cetaceans like physter do sleep vertically.
so who knows
Reptiles slower metabolism means that they can hold their breath for longer tbh
if we have large cloned dinosaurs in pk we shouldnāt limit ourselves like pz.
So maybe they did something like sea turtles do
They had no issue adding camels as passive so I suspect there's more to it than meets the eye.
Also true for sea snakes
foxes too
So its possible they just slept at the bottom
Yeah itās not like a sauropod herd is realistic to house either lol
Like as what i'd expect or what i'd want?
I like marine biology and plan to go into that field. Studying for it. I donāt care if its inaccurate to marine animal husbandry irl I just want marine animals in a dinosaur game.
Mojang is really funny for getting their panties in a twist about their impact on animal behavior knowledge AFTER they already added friggin polar bears
either or
Mojang lies
theres a slight difference between sauropods and cetaceans I think though
my personal theory is it's just an excuse they use when they can't be assed
Foxes aren't as likely to acutally kill you as camels are if they attack.
I think one of the devs has severe Galaeophobia honestly.
The frog thing was just and excuse because they didn't want to say that the way they were adding fireflies was lowkey pretty bad
since you can build an infinitely larger enclosure for sauropods than you can build a highly specialized lagoon for marine animals
Sauropods are just order of magnitude bigger than many animals and the feed costs and land needed for one
The shark thing wasn't even stated by a dev
Didnāt really have cetaceans in mind but broadly theyāre both incredibly impractical or impossible to house so I donāt see a meaningful distinction
would be insane.
I'll do both then
definitely both are impractical to house but sauropods less so
like it would hard to make an enclosure for like an argentinosaurus
We have living marine reptiles tho
Tbh Siva can go with Bramatherium and Shansitherium
this reminds me of the old Fossils and Archeology mod for Minecraft where one of the developers was viciously against Euoplocephalus being in the mod for personal reasons
especially since if you have a big enough enclosure, sauropods could in theory just eat trees for most of their diet, no?
I mean sure but my point is theyāre both impossible irl so we shouldnāt limit ourselves to what we deem ārealisticā
Theyād strip an enclosure within like 3 days
...okay, I'm gonna look up how sea turtles and snakes sleep
Sea turtles at least sleep underwater
Generously
So do sea snakes
There is also penguins
They can keep their breath and sleep for like a hour or two
Which are warm blooded and spend months at sea
You could do what we do for certain animals, keep them while they're young and easy to manage and then when they get too big release them in the wild/cut them up and serve them in hot dogs
Actually idk how many hours they sleep
Insane
snappers can live under ice for a stupid amount of time because of that
Penguins take quick naps I believe
Sea turtles kinda weird as sea reptiles because their entire anatomy evolved around them needing to go to land and lay a shitton of eggs
peak animals the ass breathers
but they can spend like most of their lives underwater
Yep
Males do at least
which is funny to me. Snappers to.
Just like pinnipeds and penguins
This too
those all spend more time on land though to raise their young
Expectations:
- Mosasaurus
- Plesiosaurus
- Ichthyosaurus
- Dunkleosteus
- Otodus (megalodon/obliquus)
- Kronosaurus
- Helicoprion
- Basilosaurus
- Shonisaurus (popularis/I. severensis)
- Archelon
Ideal:
- Temnodontosaurus
- Platecarpus
- Kronosaurus
- Basilosaurus
- Zarafasaura
- Ichthyosaurus
- Helicoprion
- Livyatan
- Trinacromerum (T. bentonianum/P. latipinnis/D. osborni)
- Parapuzosia
Yeah
But comparatively seals and penguins do spend a considerable amount of time on land
Sea turtles just stay at sea and just go there to lay eggs
(Except some subpopulations that actively basks on land)
Probably why they didn't diversify all that much tbh
they didnāt need to really. Not also species groups diversify into many different forms
turtles are good being turtles so that shape ended up staying
Zarafasaura... ā¤ļø
I love Zarafa
Like some are durophagous specialists(hawksbills), soft bodied specalists(leatherbacks) and grazers(greens)
Would kill for it to be in a dlc one day
Zarafa has my favourite skull of any animal ever I can't lie
zarafa is peak
Valid take
another plesio I want is abysso because it head is also cool
Zarafa, fluvio, abysso, aristo, so many peak plesiosaur options
but zarafa has just aura to put it nicely
True, tho they had more than one chance to
But the fact that they survived the kpg and are still alive today, just tells me they did something right lol
Or they were lucky
Probably a combo of both but
they also still occupy different niches and I pointed earlier
each species is adapted for its own food
what if Ichthyosaurus slept like this
Zarafasaura is gonna become semiaquatic Sivatherium and we'll all have a big long cry about it when EZ brings it up near Mau and he shoots it down
...Why did I write semiaquatic, it's fully aquatic lmao
I mean
Its always kinda both
But it wasn't just luck imo
Tuatara is kinda in that position, turtles still are in the vast majority of the globe
on the topic of weird aquatic mammals desmostylians
So like they did find a mild success
tuataras basically retired
Even if rn they aren't doing so hot
they were pretty common througought the mesozoic and essentially retired to new zealand, they had done their part
untill rats showed up and screwed them over tuataras were doing pretty well there
Nz tuataras are weird
they still are actually doing pretty good population wise just not in terms of range
tuataras are funny.
They have like one of the fastest evolution rates of any animal
Gotta keep making sure the thing that works stays the same
Is there anything unique about Zarafasaura
apparently their population is anywhere from 60,003 to 100,001 individuals
And their skull is all fucked up compared to the original rhyncocephalian condition
like one lone last species of a clade who lives on a isolated island.
exactly
they are retirees
Glad they didn't go extinct
who is a fucked up guy who likes to live in the cold and while many people think is the same is wildly different than its ancestors
At some point the only tuataras left were in random islands around nz
Santa Claus
also if humans do eventually make them go extinct (which I really really hope doesnt happen), it would be a new record for oldest clade made extinct by humans
the current record is held by Meiolaniids which first evolved in the Early Cretaceous
Remember. Tuatara somehow survived extinction event in NZ that took mammal, turtles and croc
Fortunately nz has a lot of breeding programs to reintroduce tuataras on the main island
So like rn they are relatively safe
its also not particularly close, most are clades that arose in the eocene or oligocene at the earliest
mhm
as I said above they are doing pretty good comparatively speaking
anywhere from 60-100k individuals
just not good in terms of range really
Coelacanths have a shot of taking that record too, out of the 2 living species 1 is endangered and the other is critically endangered
Probably something dietary given its skull proportions and dentition.
I know we have postcrania but I'm not sure if it's properly described? Someone more educated than I can probably add on to this.
oh trueeee
although Coelocanths do have the advantage of living in basically the middle of nowhere in addition to being at the bottom of the ocean
Making a saltwater fish extinct is quite the acomplisment
also I think they might be less endangered than we think they are just due to the fact they are very hard to reach and record due to the depths they live at, but thats just a personal theory
definitely
Only done once before if i'm not mistaken
iirc humans havent even managed to do it yet
A ray i think
except maybe stuff from inland seas
But that's It iirc
which are saltwater
so like the caspian sea or something like that
but yeah either way its really hard to make an ocean dwelling species go entirely extinct
Smooth handfish
I remembered that one but it got changed from extinct to data deficient in 2021
That's currently data deficient
it was declared extinct in 2020 but then changed
fishing and pollution through
fishing doesnt really effect at that level of the ocean iirc
I mean atleast the fishing is accodental
pollution is definitely a valid point though
at least not large scale commercial fishing
its too deep
Indonesian Coelacanths do get netted quite a bit
wasnāt a fishing market how they were rediscovered
ah ok
yeah
but seeing as people had been fishing in that area for a long time beforehand and it took untill 1939 to catch one
presumabley most arent fishing at that depth
true
I mean to be entirely fair I dont really think anyone has actually looked
It is weirdly conservative at the amniotan level
but since they have a rather small range they probably naturally have a low population
likely
Also it's a handfish, it's not like Its easy to catch them
Also doesn't Tasmania have a shit ton of handfish, they could have been confused for other species and as such not reported
according to wikipedia 2-5 caught per year was a whole 1% of the population
Tbf how many caves at that depth are explored, there are probably quite a few unknown populations.
for West Indian Coelacanths
thatās true
wait, we have had coelocanths in captivity?
like at all?
I thought every single one brought up to the surface was dead or died very shortly afterwards
I don't think we do currently
They died shortly afterwards, so yes they don't do well in captivity
They have hard to emulate feeding behaviors and are very Picky with the chemicals composition of water
OH FUCK GEAAG HOW DID I FORGET STYXO
speaking of coelocanths
you guys ever think we will ever find Cenozoic Coelocanth fossils?
Doubt it
I mean define Cenozoic
Danian-Holocene?
Seems like all the surface dwelling ones were done good by the meteor
what other definition is there
I mean like +50-100k years after the impact relic populations
nah those dont count
That maybe
Then i highly doubt it
Tbh i think it's more likely we find a new modern species than that
Antartic Coelacanth would be so cool
L. chalumnae come up to as shallow as 55m at night, their eyes are super sensitive.
interesting
I think that if thats the case
in theory we could possibly keep them in captivity with hyper specific conditions
the main issue isnt keeping them in captivity but getting them there alive methinks
Thats right
I mean one survived on the shitty unfit tank for 20h
Living far away from place, which could reliably keep them also isnt helping
If the tank was close i could see them surviving
Comoros national Coelacanth sanctuary
To be fair this individual survived 20 hours in times, when something like cheetah or tamarin was unthinkable to keep alive
Their oxygen intake also is heavily affected by water temperature
And they are super sensitive to chemicals, so you would have to regulate that
They've got a bunch of Rods and also a tapetum lucidem (retroreflector)
If we were using classic trial and error method we would peobably figure out how to keep coelacanth alive. Sadly many would die in process
also I think that most if not all times that coelocanths have been caught, they werent intentionally trying to catch one, let alone keeping it alive
I think if you were actually prepared it would be signifigantly more plausible
Some more interesting hurdles to keeping it
well first of all
you could have to sucuessfully bring it up slowly but steadily
Dive for it š
so that it can semi acclimate
if you do it too fast it will probably be screwed
Wouldn't then just suffocate
It needs cold water
Ig at night during winter
but probably make it infinitely more tedious
Cold and highly oxygenated
both of the places coelocanths are found are very close to the equator
so winter or summer wouldnt really matter
Off of South Africa isn't somewhere I'd call close to the equator
Afria
Good. How awesome would be one in PK
Yeah i was about to say that
I thought only near madagascar
mb
I would love it, they're my favourite fish
ok so yeah that would be the best bet then
Like sure Comoros is kidna close but SA? Enough for It to matter
But I'd prefer to go with extinct genera
Tbh i'm surprised there's only 2 Coelacanth species, seems like they would fate well almost in any ocean
Im also not sure but South Africa might have a large enough aquarium to hold one at least temporarily
Axelrodichthys seems like perfect contender
I mean the obvious choice is Mawsonia
how the hell do you search a thread on mobile
Mawsonia from kem kem is probably Axelrodichthys
Both could be alts for each other
Just do like with Rex and keep the cooler name instead of the legitimate one
If they decide to make one as not simple aquarium-terrarium critter
how big of an aquarium does one need
Latimeria are surprisingly large fish
what is the ocean but the biggest aquarium in the world
And unlike most fish very chonky
Thereās an aquarium here that could house it potentially
Like 2m I believe
Yeah I was looking for my desire of Mawsonia and Coelacanthus
Such a perfect fossil
Oooo, imagine Spino and Axelrodichthys[who let a 12 year old name this?] in an exhibit together
axelrodicthys btw is named after a icthyologist Herbert R. Axelrod
who was in 2005 sentences to 18 months in prison for tax fraud
Who let a 12 year old pick his last name
That's hilarious
Did he not learn from ol Scarface?
he was a tropical fish expert and described the cardinal tetra
and has many fish named after him and is also known for the fraud and tax fraud thing
his to me sounds like joke
I hope aquarium pack will bring some simple fish. Not everything has to be 4 - 5 star marine megafauna species
For sure - any thoughts on some of the "fillers" so to speak?
Gyrodus
Mini animals from the Cambrian speak to me as fills, think Opabinia, Tullymonstrum
Please tell me this wasn't named after the pokemon
No. It is named after being round
I personally would look for fish, which co-existed with more famous species to make nice themed areas
English speaker don't give a crap about non dinosaurs
Why does the page in my language have way more info about this guy
Like biggest tank in aquarium themed about jurassic seas:
With Leedsichthys - whale shark
Gyrodus and Aspidorhynchus - basic fish
Hybodus - sharkie
And Plesiosaurus
Paranogmius evolutus is just a liyylr guy
He's a bit bigger than most other Paranogmius species tho
Would have neat skin potential
Bananogmius is big from this family with good fossil I think
Great name too
š
I will forever insist upon the mystery maniraptoromorph
This reconstruction in particular is weird and yet neat at the same time; it's covered extensively in fuzz but doesn't have elaborate feathers. Idk how plausible it is though
Sitting just outside of Maniraptora and Compsognathidae [some authors find it nestled there instead] per various studies done in the 2010s, I wouldn't say pycnofibres would be out of the question
I feel like they help to make it seem a bit more "basal" and also allows it to have a silhouette distinct from dromaeosaurs
We really need to find more specimens, especially given the deformed skull of the holotype
No, phone, I'm not trying to discuss European political affairs of the 1940s
next closest would be that other theropod from the morrison
Tanycolagreus
they might be closely related idk
wait nvm Tany doesnt have the sickle
well Orni doesnt really either to be fair
but both it and tany are currently maniraptoroformes
It actually got a decent amount of stuff
2 specimens! One of which, a hand, was originally attributed to Onitholestes
Which one is the holotype
the conclusion here is that all ez mammal suggestions are killed by mau
Finally, someone with taste
Mainland Antarctica DLC
technically found on an offshore island but within like
a few kilometers of the antarctic peninsula
seymour island
it is from
south africa
and
australia
and
get this
a n t a r c t i c a
so thats
n e a t
Ah so one of the first true sharks isnt clickbait after all!
I'd include that shark for that Antarctica DLC, though I know I'd have to save it for when aquatics are added in
So its nothing like Cladoselache, huh?
but also stingrays
theres also a ton of other extinct groups too
the last common ancestor of all living sharks is only from the early jurassic
MODERN sharks from what I can see
possibly permian but unlikely
So is Cladoselache...
modern sharks in this context is Selachii
Cladoselache is a ratfish
possibly these
Synechodontiformes is an extinct order of prehistoric shark-like cartilaginous fish, known from the Permian to the Paleogene. They are considered to be members of Neoselachii, the group that contains modern sharks and rays.
Their placement in the group is uncertain, some authors have considered them to be members of the modern shark group Galeom...
but unlikely
Arent there early records of Early Sharks in the Devonian or something, or is that a lie?
How many lies have I been fed?
it basically depends on your definition of shark
shark can either mean the common ancestor of all living sharks and their descendants which is the correct taxonomic term
and then theres the other definition which is basically any cartilaginous fish that developed a sharklike bodyplan
for example, the second definition would include Helicoprion as a shark, but in reality they were actually closer to modern day ratfish and would not be included in the first definition
a vast majority of extinct "sharks" are members of Holocephali which includes the modern day ratfish and a few others
Holocephali (sometimes spelled Holocephala; Greek for "complete head" in reference to the fusion of upper jaw with the rest of the skull) is a subclass of cartilaginous fish. While the only living holocephalans are three families within a single order which together are commonly known as chimaeras, the group includes many extinct orders and was ...
especially during the Paleozoic
And then theres Ferromirum
Late Devonian fish that they say is a shark or something
No idea if thats true or false
its also
not a shark
and that one is interestingly also not a holocephalian
it split before even those two split being more basal than even those
GOOD GRIEF, WHAT ARE THESE LOOKALIKES!?
very basal cartilaginous fish
evolution idk
although i guess it isnt helping that the basal condition of cartilaginous fish is shark shaped
basically this
Keeping Antarctilamna in that DLC idea list
essentially if it isnt in Selachii, it isnt a true shark
Sharks are a group of elasmobranch cartilaginous fishes characterized by a ribless endoskeleton, dermal denticles, five to seven gill slits on each side, and pectoral fins that are not fused to the head. Modern sharks are classified within the division Selachii and are the sister group to the Batomorphi (rays and skates). Some sources extend the...
I swear, there really needs to be a 100% reliable paleontology website
Wikipedia just keeps changing
...Little seal... š„ŗ
Friendship ended with "Modern animal (big)", I wanna be friends with "Modern animal (tiny)" now
uhhhhh
closest I can think of is PaleoDB but thats for fossil locations and such
not cladistic info
very accurate and up to date for that stuff though
Basically impossible to maintain if you want it to hold 100% of the knowledge we have.
Stuff changes and goes back and forth a lot in the span of a few years even for just one specific organism/family, and then you gotta times that by thousands.
Unless you had a sufficiently large amount of people editing, you'd be swamped by just how much keeps switching around or being discovered.
Science is ever changing....
Maybe there will be a time where we will know everything we can about these animals
But it's not this time
Foolish atheists trying their best to study extinct animals in life when they can just wait to go to heaven and ask them personally
(Note; this may not work for sinful taxa that always go to hell)
Or you reincarnate into stegosaurus
Probably not that great considering the kinda animals it lived with
Is this paratethys dwarf?
Would be banger, if terrarium semi-aquatic mammal is this one
Seal inside terraium seems pretty cruel ngl
I know this is a game but I prefer it getting a bigger tank
I think they said from the Mesozoic
I dont think they ever said it.
They didn't
Then I got the Mandela effect lol
The 2 most requested semi aquatic mini mammals are mesozoic tbh
So like I don't blame you for thinking that lol
Sinful taxa that always go to hell:
Penguins, Ducks, Schizotheres, Otters, Pantherines, Deinotheres, Drepanosaurs, Koalas
Sinless taxa that always go to heaven:
Most Waterplants, Chalicotheres, Oviraptorosaurs, Elephant shrews, Sloths, Wombats
Anti-baptism taxa that refuse to swim and are thus only found in purgatory:
Apes (except humans), Waterstriders, Fairy flies, Dozens of small mammals and birds, Most Landplants
Saint Peter
Drepanosaurs in hell...
Nooooo
I hope plesiosaurs and pterossues go to heaven at least
Instead of the white dove, there's the white quetzalcoatlus
How beautiful
Sadly Quetzalcoatlus is shades of brown and grey
But Dsungaripterus is white
...But that reminds me Dsungaripterus is another hell-only species.
Not because they did anything bad, they just kinda fit the aesthetic.
Heavenly Polycotylid Plesiosaurs for PK when
dodo
Dodo will probably be added in dlc.
yeah not including dodos in a recently extinct pack would be like not including Rex or Trike
Or extinct birds pack
Big if tru
I can make out Dodo, Haast's Eagle? Thylacine, MOA, Bos?, Stellar's, and Is that a species of Equus at the end?
nice
a feeder animal

now we just need the cow
Quagga
So subspecies but yes
Or did you mean the other horse?
Silhouette #10
theres only 1 horse in that image
Is that the great Auk then, in spot 1
Quagga was a zebra with a unique pattern.
also the antelope is probably the bluebuck
Uggo
Thereās two
no clue what the animal below the dodo is
Tarpan
Hybrid population of wild and feral horses from Eastern Europe
I don't know Equus subspecies that well
so thank you
though we should be a wary that this group probably has gone through a few changes
if a recently extinct pack is coming
E. f. ferus
Perhaps recently extinct animals will also be included in the dlc...
my mini selection is
Passenger Pigeon
Carolina Parakeet
Ivory-Billed Woodpecker
Golden Toad
Yunnan lake newt or
Southern pig-footed bandicoot or
Sea mink
What the flying fuck is that thing (fish)
chinese paddlefish
We should keep it extinct
they were huge, migratory and predatory and now only the american paddlefish exists
they were much bigger than the american
and just weird it is sad they gone
China and America: the only places that had paddlefish and alligators in the last few hundred years
Few million years I would guess?
I think passenger pigeons and Carolina parakeets would be good for a terrarium display.
I'm not sure when the others became extinct so I decided to play it safe
I know the two alligator species have been the only ones for awhile I donāt know abt the paddlefish
Also it would be nice if they added some recently extinct reptiles like Hanyusuchus sinensis or Voay robustus (even if the later doesn't really have a common name)
Wait until you find out about goblin sharks
iāve seen people call Voay the Malagasy Horned Crocodile or just Malagasy Crocodile
i just go by what wiki gives me
Call me simple but I love this thing
As for reptiles, Mecosuchus is also good. It is the last land crocodile that lost the battle for survival against humans.
What african pleistocene animals would be cool to have with quagga
Afrifan
Nope
Long Horned Buffalo
Its spelled african
Bluebuck
Others?
That aren't hippo but big
Granted I wonder what counts as recently extinct to the devs; all the ones on the image died out after 1000 C.E.
the picture says last 2 millennia
so anything not before 0 B.C.E.
not gonna be a lot of Late Pleistocene megafauna from Africa that arenāt still around
it was very lightly hit by the Late Pleistocene extinction
again Bluebuck
Palaeoloxodon
though looking it up, I don't know if it's range overlapped with the Quagga
That's a cool species to put with quagga
Aepyornis?
Palaeoloxodon wasnāt in Africa by Late Pleistocene iirc
still would go cool together
but it didnāt coexist with the Quagga afaik
okay I take that back the Bluebuck would have lived alongside the Quagga
Hippo with turbocancer
It gives the feeling ig
Malagasy hippo
I wonder if Paleoloxodon had internal testes
Good Madagascar pack filler
a Madagascar pack would be so cool
@low bridge what do you think, any mammals you'd like to see alongside quagga?
Malagasy Hippo is baby and unique and cute and loved and necessary addition and good addition
I forgot quagga is from south agrica
Agrica
mini hippos that were more terrestrial, the heaviest bird of all time, giant lemurs
Oh along side quagga
Malagasy Croc is cool but not that unique so idk if itās a good addition
i meant for Madagascar pack
Well more unique than quagga tbh
Voay is interesting
Aepyornis maximus, Hippopotamus laloumena,Voay robustus, Cylindraspis vosmaeri/peltastes, and of course, Raphus cucullatus would work for an African Island pack
Uhhh archeoindris where
Voay is cool but again itās not the MOST interesting pick for PK and it isnāt a quintessential Pleistocene Madagascar animal like the Hippos are
no monkeys allowed
Archaeoindris is my most wanted primate tbh
im not opposed to it for the record
It's a lemur āļøš¤
Not a monkey technically š¤ š
To be honest, I just forgot about it
Convergent evolution
Madagascar pack needs megaladapis.
Nah fam we don't need watto i'm the game
I feel like one extinct lemur would be enough
Archaeo all the way
Sloth lemurs gonna be terrarium or special exhibit
i love the Gorilla Lemur
Alf?
Striking resemblance
my bad gng š
i forgot theyāre not reliable with size
maybe a koala lol.
For giant tortoises
The 240kg number came from a femoral head diam
