#2013 -> 2024
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Hope youâre prepared for people to come here and say âwheres mousepadâ 
Lol have the same peripherals
cant say i am fully satisfied with the gpx but im looking to case swap and swap keycaps on my 60he
idm the stock sound so
One step at a time đ
Thatâll be awesome!!
you got the mac there⊠but your running Windows?
desktop is under the desk! mac is just for productivity because Windows is garbage for anything other than gaming.
cap
convince me otherwise.
its the same thing.
so if I want to ssh on Windows, should I go to the Window's store and download the Ubuntu subsystem or download OpenSSH or PuTTy?
If I want to run it headless and use it for anything productive or as a server, how can I do that?
if I want to index the file system and distribute it across multiple nodes on Windows, how do I do that?
How is the same, convice me.
Interesting how no large tech runs Windows for anything productive, or how everything you use doesn't rely on windows, e.g., with discord that you're sending me a message through now.
personally, the support for exe files is much better than dmg files, I have no need to do anything on a server, and if I want to do something productive at least I can get performance for a fraction of the price of the cheese grater
Youâll never see a serious engineering team running their workflows on Windows -- it's all bloatware or with exe's, malware, which aren't sandboxed whatsoever. If you're concerned about just cost, sure, but it will limit you. Nonetheless, I'm not conviced with it "being the same thing"
By the way, I'm not arguing purely for macos, but unix altogether over windows.
are the majority of people âserious engineering teams?â I don't think so, I'm seeing this from a point of compatibility of software and file types. Personally the workflow when I used MacOS, was annoying and finicky (3-4 years). I see your point though, from a software level, it makes more sense to use Unix systems over Windows because of the bloatware, malware, etc. But until Apple makes their products at a more competitive price level for performance with PCs (Windows) then, for me, its a no-brainer to use the more affordable system.
Also, since most people aren't âserious engineering teamsâ I see them as the same as long as you know how to navigate them safely, you can essentially do the same thing.
I understand your point, but you genuinely can't do the same thing... I see you're "video editing" and challenge you to see what os is used for the supercomputers to render films from disney and pixar. If you're just an average dad or mom, they don't use 80% of a machine anyway, so it doesn't matter. But they aren't the same. Competitive pricing is relative with what you're working on. Interested in running Llama 405B locally? Have fun getting a $100k system with Windows and 4 H100s to run it on Windows when a cluster of 4 Mac Studios can run it.
why would I need to render a whole movie? I see your point, but your making a lot of your arguments on the grounds of it being better if your doing REALLY heavy-duty things. ofc when you put it into an extreme comparison the tides will shift, but as I said, I'm saying this on the grounds of the average person.
That is right! A lot of heavy-duty tasks run our world. I also didnât think Wooting keyboards were for the average person đ Iâm still not convinced.
dawg I'm not about to dish out 100k to render movies. Sure I have a nice setup that can render smaller video files, but I DO NOT need 4 cheese graters to render a youtube video
Also a Wooting isn't that much if you save for it. Buying a whole Mac studio is

and do you realize I mentioned âaverage personâ like 2-3 times? Sure they may be better for servers and giant renders, but does the average person doing graphic design, video editing, word documents, etc need an expensive supercomputer?
all that workflow and 100k systems but no mousepad?
lol no
that was a debate we were having