Warcraft Logs
#M+ prot review
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
@fickle heath
Gave you the 1st one i ran but lmk what you think i need to work on given wat was discussed earlier.
ill take a look in a bit
im just gonna put things here, read them when youre able, but its gonna be staggered cause im busy burning myself out on priories
76% blocked hits need a lot of attention, you need to be 95%+
this is kinda consistent with this
which means its not back hits
but there could be a couple
this is by far the #1 thing in your priority: fix SB effective uptime
you blocked 100% of all keg smashes which is fine
mean mug chunked you a bit, since youre not a dwarf, you can shockwave and backstep or strafe on those first few pulls so you can reset it often
but it seems youre doing well in that front since you only got to 4 stacks
your shield slam APM could be higher, but since its a short log it might not paint the whole picture
youre casting way too many Tclaps, might just be youre not getting resets
youre casting demo shout + demolish at almost the end of the avatar window, that will dephase your demo shout quite a bit, so less dps overall
youre using outburst on TC, which you shouldnt be doing - at least not that much you have 8 casts with outbursts
youre not thane, do not use TC that much, youre clipping your outbursts
its fine on big pulls to outburst TC vs 7 whole casts of SS with outburst
my mistake its only 8 casts, edited to reflect that
i can dig in some more later
for now #1 prio: fix your SB effective uptime
95% at a bare minimum
keep SB up
oh - thats incredible feed back
i appreciate the deep dive
yeah i think i def hit tclap too much but i think iof it when its free and nothing else.
appreciate this - SB is def low for sure
well thats just not true, 75% is average ; 85% is very good for blocks, theres about 0 logs with a 95%
I posted this in another thread in response to you, but for visibility to counter misinformation, here's a log with 93%, with 92 of the 119 hits not blocked being back hits while shield block was up
I'm not entirely sure why you would hijack someone else's log review, 5 days later after feedback was provided, to say something like this. I would suggest moving this discussion elsewhere since it doesn't directly concern the OP.
That being said, the comment "You need to be 95%+" is putting a number as a goal line, something to aim at, not an exact number, similarly to "as close to 100% as possible".