#openclaw setup comparison

1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)

echo gazelle
#

Gateway Placement

Local Machine: Glymur (Windows)

Remote Machine: Hulk Box [Glymur (Debian) + AI 100]

High-Level Architectural Direction

Setup 1: WebUI Control and Gateway on Local Machine + vLLM on Remote machine.

Setup 2: WebUI Control on Local Machine + Remote Gateway and vLLM on Remote machine.

Nodes can be connected to either setup when distributed access to files or system-level operations is required.

Setup1 โ€“ Local Machine

Setup2 โ€“ Remote Machine

  • Nodes are external connections introduced to provide extended access and operational control over a distributed system. Nodes connections are optional in Setup1.

Architectural Comparison and Trade-offs:

Setup1

Setup2 (Recommended)

Architecture

Gateway runs on local machine; LLM hosted on Remote Machine

Gateway and LLM are co-located on Remote Machine.

Gateway Availability

Depends on local Machine uptime and network connectivity

Always-on, centralized orchestration and control.

Latency Between Gateway and LLM

Cross-machine communication introduces higher latency

Minimal latency (same machine)

File Access & Operations

Limited to local machine paths; additional access requires explicit setup/approval

Limited to Remote machine environment; external access requires configured nodes

Failure

Multiple failure points (local machine, network, remote host)

Single point of failure; Easy monitoring and recovery.

Sensitive Data

Stays on local Machine; better control and privacy

Centralized on Hulk; needs strong security and backup.

which setup is best recommended? Will there be any latency between gateway and LLM if located on different machine?

surreal falconBOT
#

To help others find answers, you can mark your question as solved via Right click solution message -> Apps -> โœ… Mark Solution

echo gazelle
#

@tawdry shell