#my openclaw killed itself trying to repair the openclaw update
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Paste them here, I’ll dig in.
Also include these right away so we don’t guess:
openclaw --version
openclaw status
And if you know it:
- how you installed OpenClaw (
npm -g,pnpm -g, source checkout, app, etc.) - the exact repair/update command it tried to run
- the full error text from the failed repair
If it’s long, screenshots are fine too.
Last message from my ai agent:
You got multiple queued messages I couldn't respond to — that's the gateway going silent again. You had to restart it yourself at 14:35.
What happened: After the OpenClaw update to 2026.4.15, the gateway ran but the cron jobs started failing with ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND — the new server version is trying to import a runtime file with a hash that doesn't match. This is a broken update/install issue.
On the error: The cron jobs for all 9 prediction trackers failed because the update left the OpenClaw install in a broken state — server.impl-GQ72oJBa.js is importing run-context.runtime-Cx9f6z-7.js which doesn't exist. This explains why the gateway was responding to you but cron jobs were failing silently.
Fixing now: Two things in parallel:
- Fix the broken OpenClaw install (reinstall the module)
- Spawn a Jarvis diagnostic agent to fix the module error permanently and verify all cron jobs work
Going to message tool now to avoid any further delivery issues.
last openclaw version:
blitzo@blitzos-mpb-2019-ai ~ % openclaw gateway status
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — Half butler, half debugger, full crustacean.
Yeah, that does smell like a half-applied update, not a cron bug.
Two important bits from the docs:
openclaw updateis the right recovery path for package installs- asking the agent to update/repair itself is possible but not recommended, because the gateway restart can drop the live session mid-repair
Docs:
- https://docs.openclaw.ai/help/faq#can-i-ask-openclaw-to-update-itself
- https://docs.openclaw.ai/install/updating
- https://docs.openclaw.ai/cli/update
Please paste these next:
openclaw --version
openclaw update status
openclaw doctor
openclaw gateway status
And if you want to try the safest manual repair now, run it from your shell, not through the agent:
openclaw update
openclaw doctor
openclaw gateway restart
If openclaw update itself fails, tell me:
- how OpenClaw was installed, and
- the full error
If this was a package install, the next step is usually a manual reinstall of the package, but I want to see the outputs first so we don’t make it worse.
my ai agent automatically attempted to fix the borken openclaw update:
now openclaw isnt recognized on my command line:
blitzo@blitzos-mpb-2019-ai .openclaw % openclaw
zsh: command not found: openclaw
blitzo@blitzos-mpb-2019-ai .openclaw % openclaw gateway status
zsh: command not found: openclaw
Thanks, that confirms you’re on 2026.4.15.
That by itself doesn’t tell us whether the install is healthy though, it just shows the banner. Please paste the full output of these:
openclaw update status
openclaw doctor
openclaw gateway status
If you want to try the quickest safe repair now, do it from Terminal, not through the agent:
openclaw update --yes
openclaw doctor
openclaw gateway restart
If that says you’re already current but cron is still throwing ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND, go one level more blunt and reinstall cleanly:
curl -fsSL https://openclaw.ai/install.sh | bash -s -- --no-onboard
openclaw doctor
openclaw gateway restart
And if it fails again, grab the first real stack trace with:
openclaw logs --follow
Then paste the first ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND block here. That should be enough to pin down whether this is a stale dist/ inventory problem or something else.
Oof, okay, now it’s in the CLI missing / PATH broken / package got removed bucket.
The docs say openclaw: command not found is usually PATH-related, but since the agent was “repairing”, it may also have nuked the global install.
Fastest recovery path on macOS: rerun the installer from Terminal, not from the agent:
curl -fsSL https://openclaw.ai/install.sh | bash -s -- --no-onboard
Then run:
rehash
openclaw --version
openclaw gateway status
If it still says command not found, paste these:
which node
which npm
npm prefix -g
echo "$PATH"
npm list -g --depth=0 openclaw
If npm list -g shows OpenClaw is installed, the fix is likely just putting $(npm prefix -g)/bin back on PATH in ~/.zshrc.
Docs:
Paste the installer output or the 5 commands above and I’ll help you get it unstuck.
Install plan
OS: macos
Install method: npm
Requested version: latest
Onboarding: skipped
[1/3] Preparing environment
✓ Homebrew already installed
✓ Node.js v25.6.1 found
· Active Node.js: v25.6.1 (/usr/local/bin/node)
· Active npm: 11.9.0 (/usr/local/bin/npm)
[2/3] Installing OpenClaw
✓ Git already installed
· Installing OpenClaw v2026.4.15
✓ OpenClaw npm package installed
✓ OpenClaw installed
[3/3] Finalizing setup
· Refreshing loaded gateway service
✓ Gateway service metadata refreshed
✗ Restarting gateway service failed — re-run with --verbose for details
Restarted LaunchAgent: gui/501/ai.openclaw.gateway
Timed out after 60s waiting for gateway port 18789 to become healthy.
Gateway process is running but port 18789 is still free (startup hang/crash loop or very slow VM startup).
Service runtime: status=running, state=active, pid=52861
Gateway port 18789 status: free.
Gateway restart timed out after 60s waiting for health checks.
Tip: openclaw gateway status --deep
Tip: openclaw doctor
! Gateway service restart failed; continuing
🦞 OpenClaw installed successfully (OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a))!
Installation complete. Your productivity is about to get weird.
blitzo@blitzos-mpb-2019-ai .openclaw % rehash
blitzo@blitzos-mpb-2019-ai .openclaw % openclaw --version
OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a)
blitzo@blitzos-mpb-2019-ai .openclaw % openclaw gateway status
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — I'm the reason your shell history looks like a hacker-movie montage.
│
◇
Service: LaunchAgent (loaded)
File logs: /tmp/openclaw/openclaw-2026-04-18.log
Command: /usr/local/opt/node/bin/node /usr/local/lib/node_modules/openclaw/dist/index.js gateway --port 18789
Service file: ~/Library/LaunchAgents/ai.openclaw.gateway.plist
Service env: OPENCLAW_GATEWAY_PORT=18789
Config (cli): ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json
Config (service): ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json
Gateway: bind=loopback (127.0.0.1), port=18789 (service args)
Probe target: ws://127.0.0.1:18789
Dashboard: http://127.0.0.1:18789/
Probe note: Loopback-only gateway; only local clients can connect.
Runtime: running (pid 53569, state active)
RPC probe: ok
Listening: 127.0.0.1:18789
Troubles: run openclaw status
Troubleshooting: https://docs.openclaw.ai/troubleshooting
Good, that’s progress, the CLI is back.
So the problem has narrowed to: the LaunchAgent restarts, but the gateway never binds port 18789.
Please run these and paste the outputs:
openclaw gateway status --deep
openclaw doctor
tail -n 200 /tmp/openclaw/openclaw-gateway.log
Those three should tell us whether this is:
- a startup crash,
- a config/service mismatch,
- or a stale extra LaunchAgent / multiple gateway install issue.
One thing I also don’t love here: you’re on Node 25.6.1. OpenClaw docs recommend Node 24 as the default runtime. I wouldn’t jump to changing that yet, but if the log looks weird or empty, that’s probably the next move.
Docs:
- https://docs.openclaw.ai/gateway/troubleshooting
- https://docs.openclaw.ai/platforms/mac/bundled-gateway
- https://docs.openclaw.ai/install/node
Paste those 3 outputs and I’ll help sort the next step.
Nice, that looks healthy again 🎉
The important lines are:
RPC probe: okListening: 127.0.0.1:18789Config (cli)andConfig (service)match
So the gateway is back up. The installer’s earlier restart timeout was probably just a slow settle during launchd restart.
Next I’d do:
openclaw status
Then send your agent a quick test message.
If the original cron issue comes back, run:
openclaw logs --follow
and paste the first new error block. If everything responds normally now, you’re probably out of the woods.
If it gets flaky again, the one thing I’d still keep an eye on is Node 25. OpenClaw prefers Node 24, but I wouldn’t touch that unless the problem returns.
blitzo@blitzos-mpb-2019-ai .openclaw % openclaw gateway status --deep
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — Ah, the fruit tree company! 🍎
│
◇
Service: LaunchAgent (loaded)
File logs: /tmp/openclaw/openclaw-2026-04-18.log
Command: /usr/local/opt/node/bin/node /usr/local/lib/node_modules/openclaw/dist/index.js gateway --port 18789
Service file: ~/Library/LaunchAgents/ai.openclaw.gateway.plist
Service env: OPENCLAW_GATEWAY_PORT=18789
Config (cli): ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json
Config (service): ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json
Gateway: bind=loopback (127.0.0.1), port=18789 (service args)
Probe target: ws://127.0.0.1:18789
Dashboard: http://127.0.0.1:18789/
Probe note: Loopback-only gateway; only local clients can connect.
Runtime: running (pid 54447, state active)
Warm-up: launch agents can take a few seconds. Try again shortly.
RPC probe: failed
RPC target: ws://127.0.0.1:18789
timeout
Port 18789 is already in use.
- pid 54447 blitzo: openclaw-gateway (127.0.0.1:18789)
- Gateway already running locally. Stop it (openclaw gateway stop) or use a different port.
Listening: 127.0.0.1:18789
Other gateway-like services detected (best effort): - com.openclaw.tailscale_serve (user, plist: /Users/blitzo/Library/LaunchAgents/com.openclaw.tailscale_serve.plist)
- com.openclaw.usage_alert (user, plist: /Users/blitzo/Library/LaunchAgents/com.openclaw.usage_alert.plist)
- com.openclaw.usage_stats (user, plist: /Users/blitzo/Library/LaunchAgents/com.openclaw.usage_stats.plist)
Cleanup hint: launchctl bootout gui/$UID/ai.openclaw.gateway
Cleanup hint: rm ~/Library/LaunchAgents/ai.openclaw.gateway.plist
Recommendation: run a single gateway per machine for most setups. One gateway supports multiple agents (see docs: /gateway#multiple-gateways-same-host).
If you need multiple gateways (e.g., a rescue bot on the same host), isolate ports + config/state (see docs: /gateway#multiple-gateways-same-host).
Troubles: run openclaw status
This --deep output looks noisy, not catastrophic.
What I see:
Listening: 127.0.0.1:18789✅- the process using port 18789 is the gateway itself (
pid 54447) ✅ --deepis best-effort service discovery, not a better health probe- the extra
com.openclaw.*items are helper LaunchAgents, not obviously a second real gateway
So I would not run the cleanup hints or delete the plist right now.
The RPC probe: failed timeout looks like a transient warm-up race, especially because your plain openclaw gateway status right before this showed RPC probe: ok.
At this point I’d do:
openclaw status
Then test the bot normally.
If openclaw status looks fine and the bot replies, you’re basically recovered.
If the original cron/import issue comes back, grab:
openclaw logs --follow
and paste the first new error block.
Glad we caught this before you started deleting launchd stuff 😅
Telegram: ok (@Tron2_26bot) (826ms)
Agents: main (default), jarvis
Heartbeat interval: 30m (main)
Session store (main): /Users/blitzo/.openclaw/agents/main/sessions/sessions.json (664 entries)
- agent:main:main (1m ago)
- agent:main:cron:pred-uk-xanax (1m ago)
- agent:main:cron:pred-uk-xanax:run:f0751d8e-05f3-4a3a-8349-7a5d04756f34 (1m ago)
- agent:main:cron:pred-pangolin_scales (2m ago)
- agent:main:cron:pred-pangolin_scales:run:ac9f089e-bf52-4612-a0da-a3ba755bced6 (2m ago)
Run "openclaw doctor --fix" to apply changes.
│
└ Doctor complete.
That actually looks pretty healthy now.
The reassuring bits:
Telegram: ok- agents are loaded (
main,jarvis) - your cron session entries were updated 1 to 2 minutes ago
So the gateway is up, the agent stack is alive, and cron looks like it’s running again.
openclaw doctor --fix sounds like cleanup / migrations still available, not “the system is broken”. I’d treat that as optional housekeeping unless something is still failing.
At this point I’d just:
- send the bot a normal test message
- wait for the next expected tracker run
- only if it breaks again, capture
openclaw logs --follow
If the bot is replying again and the trackers are moving, I think you’re fixed 🎉
If this did fix it, please right-click the solution message → Apps → ✅ Mark Solution so Answer Overflow can index it for the next person.
openclaw status
│ Dashboard │ http://127.0.0.1:18789/ │
│ Tailscale │ serve · blitzos-mpb-2019-ai.tail8bffb0.ts.net · https://blitzos-mpb-2019-ai.tail8bffb0.ts.net │
│ Gateway │ local · ws://127.0.0.1:18789 (local loopback) · unreachable (gateway closed (1006): ) │
│ Gateway service │ LaunchAgent installed · not loaded · unknown │
│ Node service │ LaunchAgent not installed │
│ Agents │ 2 · 1 bootstrap file present · sessions 1240 · default main active 1m ago │
│ Memory │ 0 files · 0 chunks · dirty · sources memory · plugin memory-core · vector ready · fts ready · cache on (0) │
│ Plugin compatibility │ none │
│ Tasks │ 5 active · 0 queued · 5 running · 9 issues · audit 3 errors · 6 warn · 21 tracked │
│ Heartbeat │ 30m (main), disabled (jarvis) │
│ Sessions │ 1240 active · default MiniMax-M2.7 (200k ctx) · 2 stores │
Security audit
Summary: 0 critical · 2 warn · 2 info
WARN Reverse proxy headers are not trusted
gateway.bind is loopback and gateway.trustedProxies is empty. If you expose the Control UI through a reverse proxy, configure trusted proxies so local-client c…
Fix: Set gateway.trustedProxies to your proxy IPs or keep the Control UI local-only.
WARN Some gateway.nodes.denyCommands entries are ineffective
gateway.nodes.denyCommands uses exact node command-name matching only (for example system.run), not shell-text filtering inside a command payload. - Unknown …
Fix: Use exact command names (for example: canvas.present, canvas.hide, canvas.navigate, canvas.eval, canvas.snapshot, canvas.a2ui.push, canvas.a2ui.pushJSONL, canvas.a2ui.reset). If you need broader restrictions, remove risky command IDs from allowCommands/default workflows and tighten tools.exec policy.
Full report: openclaw security audit
Deep probe: openclaw security audit --deep
Okay, this one is more mixed.
openclaw status caught a disconnect:
Gateway ... unreachable (gateway closed (1006))Gateway service ... not loaded
But earlier openclaw gateway status showed the gateway actually listening and healthy.
When those disagree, I’d trust openclaw gateway status more for gateway truth. openclaw status is a broader snapshot and can catch the gateway mid-restart / mid-reconnect.
I’d do one clean pass now:
openclaw gateway restart
openclaw gateway status
openclaw status
If openclaw gateway status comes back with:
RPC probe: okListening: 127.0.0.1:18789
then you’re basically operational, even if openclaw status was noisy a moment earlier.
If they still disagree after the restart, please paste:
openclaw status --all
That’s the full pasteable diagnosis and should make the mismatch much clearer.
That part is not the main problem.
The important line is:
0 critical
Both warnings are basically config hygiene, not “your update is broken”:
-
gateway.trustedProxiesis empty
Only matters if you’re intentionally exposing the Control UI through a reverse proxy / Tailscale serve. If you keep it local-only, that warning is fine. -
Some
gateway.nodes.denyCommandsentries don’t match real command names
Worth cleaning up later, but not related to the update/install blow-up.
So this security section does not explain the earlier crash or the temporary 1006 disconnect.
At this point I’d focus on the real test:
- does the bot reply normally now?
- do the cron/tracker runs resume?
If yes, I’d stop digging for the moment.
If no, paste either:
openclaw gateway status
or the first errors from:
openclaw logs --follow
That’ll be way more useful than the security audit for this specific issue.
openclaw tasks maintenance --apply
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — Making 'I'll automate that later' happen now.
Tasks maintenance (applied): tasks 3 reconcile · 0 cleanup stamp · 0 prune; task-flows 0 reconcile · 0 prune
Tasks health after apply: 0 queued · 3 running · 5 audit errors · 6 audit warnings
Tasks health before apply: 5 audit errors · 6 audit warnings
openclaw gateway restart
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — I'm the reason your shell history looks like a hacker-movie montage.
Gateway LaunchAgent was installed but not loaded; re-bootstrapped launchd service.
That result makes sense after a messy restart.
What it means:
- 3 tasks got reconciled ✅
- queued dropped to 0 ✅
- but there are still 5 audit errors / 6 warnings in the task ledger
So tasks maintenance --apply cleaned up some stale bookkeeping, but it did not prove the gateway itself is broken. It mostly says, “yeah, some background-task records got weird during the crash.”
If the bot is replying again, I would not panic about this.
If you want to inspect the leftover task issues specifically, run:
openclaw tasks audit
That will tell you whether the remaining problems are just:
- stale running tasks,
- lost tasks,
- failed deliveries,
- or missing cleanup stamps.
If you paste that output, I can tell you whether it’s harmless leftover debris or something still actively broken.
Nice, that’s actually a very good sign.
That message means the issue was at least partly stale launchd state:
- the LaunchAgent existed
- but it wasn’t properly loaded
openclaw gateway restartre-bootstrapped it
Now immediately check both again:
openclaw gateway status
openclaw status
If openclaw gateway status shows RPC probe: ok and openclaw status stops showing gateway closed (1006), then I’d call this fixed.
my ai agent is responding but lately he has been responding slowly.
Glad he’s replying again. Slow right after this kind of crash/restart wouldn’t surprise me.
Most likely causes now are:
- leftover task pressure / cleanup
- provider-side latency / rate limiting
- a very long session history in that chat
Quickest way to narrow it down:
openclaw tasks audit
openclaw logs --follow
Then send the agent one short test message and watch for:
- long gaps with no output
- 429 / timeout / upstream errors
- stale running / lost task findings
Also, if he’s only slow in one old conversation but fast in a fresh one, that usually points to session-history bloat rather than the gateway itself.
If you want, paste:
openclaw tasks audit- the first warnings/errors from
openclaw logs --follow
and I’ll help pinpoint whether it’s backlog, gateway, or upstream latency.
openclaw tasks audit
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — I read logs so you can keep pretending you don't have to.
Tasks audit: 21 findings · 9 errors · 12 warnings
Task findings: 20 · TaskFlow findings: 1
Scope Severity Code Item Status Age Detail
Task error stale_running 258ea892-… running 48m running task appears stuck
Task error lost b151ab80-… lost 43m backing session missing
Task error lost f4a2514c-… lost 10m backing session missing
Task error lost ed433130-… lost 10m backing session missing
Task error lost e0b01009-… lost 10m backing session missing
Task error lost 924a0252-… lost 8m backing session missing
Task error lost cd02d76f-… lost 8m backing session missing
Task error lost ea8d5410-… lost 2m backing session missing
Task error lost c55750f6-… lost 1m backing session missing
Task warn delivery_failed 5f30435a-… failed 47m terminal update delivery failed
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 2311c705-… failed fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 84188ef8-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 2f38988e-… failed fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps ed433130-… lost fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 924a0252-… lost fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps ea8d5410-… lost fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 29593dd3-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps a39185b4-… failed fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 904e2e1d-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 03758037-… running fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
TaskFlow warn inconsistent_timestamps a0cab2ac-… running fresh updatedAt is earlier than createdAt
Yep, this is finally useful.
What it says:
- the
losttasks are mostly crash fallout, their backing sessions are gone - the real actionable one is the
stale_runningtask that’s been “running” for 48 minutes
That stale running task is the one most likely to contribute to the sluggishness.
I’d check the active running tasks now:
openclaw tasks list --status running
Then inspect the stuck one:
openclaw tasks show <task-id>
If it’s clearly abandoned / wedged, cancel it:
openclaw tasks cancel <task-id>
A useful nuance: the lost tasks are mostly historical debris. They’re ugly, but they don’t necessarily mean something is still actively burning CPU right now. The stale running one is the bigger suspect.
If you paste:
openclaw tasks list --status running
I can help you decide which task(s) are safe to cancel.
These warnings look mostly like bookkeeping scars from the crash, not the root cause of the slowdown.
How I’d read them:
delivery_failed= one background-task update message failed to deliver 47m agoinconsistent_timestamps= task timeline metadata got a bit scrambled during the mess- those timestamp warnings are annoying, but not usually what makes replies slow
The only parts I still care about are the things that are still running:
03758037-… running- TaskFlow
a0cab2ac-… running
So I’d inspect the live ones next:
openclaw tasks list --status running
openclaw tasks flow list --status running
If one of those is clearly the abandoned self-repair / diagnostic run, that’s the one I’d cancel.
If you paste those two outputs, I can help you pick the safe one(s) to kill.
08:17:53+00:00 warn model-fallback/decision {"subsystem":"model-fallback/decision"} {"event":"model_fallback_decision","tags":["error_handling","model_fallback","candidate_failed"],"runId":"58d102d9-c4be-4495-bb09-7a7ceb6454df","decision":"candidate_failed","requestedProvider":"minimax","requestedModel":"MiniMax-M2.7","candidateProvider":"openrouter","candidateModel":"stepfun/step-3.5-flash:free","attempt":7,"total":7,"reason":"auth","status":401,"errorPreview":"No API key found for provider "openrouter". Auth store: /Users/blitzo/.openclaw/agents/jarvis/agent/auth-profiles.json (agentDir: /Users/blitzo/.openclaw/agents/jarvis/agent). Configure auth for this agent (openclaw agents add <id>) or copy auth-profiles.json from the main agentDir.","errorHash":"sha256:5088b7a4b773","isPrimary":false,"requestedModelMatched":false,"fallbackConfigured":true} model fallback decision
08:17:53+00:00 warn agents/auth-profiles {"subsystem":"agents/auth-profiles"} {"source":"auth.json","dropped":1,"reasons":{"non_object":1},"keys":["token"]} ignored invalid auth profile entries during store load
08:17:53+00:00 warn cron {"module":"cron"} {"jobId":"fe647f6c-eed9-47f7-9f33-c6e331abb6eb"} browser cleanup unavailable: Error: Unable to resolve bundled plugin public surface browser/browser-maintenance.js
08:17:53+00:00 warn cron {"module":"cron"} {"jobId":"pred-panda_plushie"} browser cleanup unavailable: Error: Unable to resolve bundled plugin public surface browser/browser-maintenance.js
08:18:22+00:00 warn agent/embedded {"subsystem":"agent/embedded"} workspace bootstrap file MEMORY.md is 23156 chars (limit 20000); truncating in injected context (sessionKey=***
08:18:41+00:00 warn agent/embedded {"subsystem":"agent/embedded"} workspace bootstrap file MEMORY.md is 23156 chars (limit 20000); truncating in injected context (sessionKey=***
08:18:55+00:00 warn diagnostic {"subsystem":"diagnostic"} lane wait exceeded: lane=nested waitedMs=61187 queueAhead=0
08:19:10+00:00 error [tools] read failed: ENOENT: no such file or directory, access '/Users/blitzo/.openclaw/workspace/docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md' raw_params={"path":"/Users/blitzo/.openclaw/workspace/docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md"}
08:19:10+00:00 error [tools] read failed: ENOENT: no such file or directory, access '/Users/blitzo/.openclaw/workspace/docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md' raw_params={"path":"/Users/blitzo/.openclaw/workspace/docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md"}
08:19:39+00:00 warn agent/embedded {"subsystem":"agent/embedded"} workspace bootstrap file MEMORY.md is 23156 chars (limit 20000); truncating in injected context (sessionKey=***
08:19:40+00:00 error [agent] run eba17f75-bf79-45b8-ad96-74560dd7f2e5 ended with stopReason=toolUse
08:20:33+00:00 warn diagnostic {"subsystem":"diagnostic"} lane wait exceeded: lane=session:agent:main:main waitedMs=46029 queueAhead=0
These logs actually explain the slowness pretty well.
Biggest signals:
-
lane wait exceeded ... waitedMs=61187
Something sat in the nested work lane for 61s. That matches “the bot feels slow” almost perfectly. -
Jarvis is trying a fallback it cannot use
It’s attempting OpenRouter as a fallback, but Jarvis has no OpenRouter auth, so it burns time failing through that path.
Auth is per-agent, so Jarvis does not automatically inherit main’s creds. -
MEMORY.mdis too large
It’s over the 20k injected-context limit, so every run is truncating it. Not fatal, but it adds overhead. -
browser cleanup unavailable
Annoying, but probably not the main reason replies are slow.
So if I had to rank causes:
- stuck/running task pressure
- Jarvis fallback auth misconfig
- oversized MEMORY.md
Most useful fixes next:
- cancel any obviously abandoned running task(s)
- give Jarvis the same auth profiles as main, or remove the broken OpenRouter fallback for Jarvis
- trim
MEMORY.mddown below the injected limit if you can
If you want, paste:
openclaw tasks list --status running
and I’ll tell you what I’d cancel first.
Ah, that’s another real clue.
Something in your agent setup is still telling it to read:
/Users/blitzo/.openclaw/workspace/docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md
but that file doesn’t exist anymore.
That won’t usually kill the gateway, but it can waste turns and add latency if the agent keeps trying to read it and failing.
I’d check where that reference is coming from:
grep -R "docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md" ~/.openclaw ~/.openclaw/workspace 2>/dev/null
If that finds something, you’ve got two options:
- restore/create that
TASKS.mdfile if it’s supposed to exist - or remove/update the reference if the file was moved/deleted
So at this point you’ve got a few separate slowdown contributors:
- stuck/running task pressure
- Jarvis fallback auth miss
- oversized
MEMORY.md - repeated reads of a missing
TASKS.md
That missing-file reference is definitely worth fixing.
Yep, this fits the same pattern.
MEMORY.md is 23156 chars= every run is carrying too much bootstrap context, then getting truncatedended with stopReason=toolUseright after the other tool errors strongly suggests the run got tangled in a tool path instead of finishing cleanly
So I wouldn’t treat stopReason=toolUse as a brand new mystery. It’s probably a symptom of the earlier stuff:
- missing
docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md - oversized
MEMORY.md - lingering task pressure
At this point, the two cleanest fixes are still:
- fix/remove the bad
TASKS.mdreference - trim
MEMORY.mdbelow the 20k injected limit
Those are the ones most likely to reduce wasted tool calls and prompt bloat.
If you want, paste the result of:
grep -R "docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md" ~/.openclaw ~/.openclaw/workspace 2>/dev/null
and I can help trace exactly where that bad reference lives.
Yep, that’s a real slowdown signal.
lane=session:agent:main:main waitedMs=46029
means the main agent session lane sat blocked for 46 seconds.
The interesting part is:
queueAhead=0
So it wasn’t just stuck behind a pile of other requests. It was slow inside its own session lane, which usually points to things like:
- long tool calls / retries
- fallback churn
- oversized injected context
- a messy/stuck session state
So this pushes me even more toward:
- oversized
MEMORY.md - bad
TASKS.mdreference causing failed tool reads - stale running task(s)
- possibly some fallback/auth churn
If you want the fastest practical relief, I’d prioritize:
- fixing the missing
TASKS.mdreference - trimming
MEMORY.md - cancelling obviously abandoned running tasks
Also, if the slowness is worst in that same old conversation, try a fresh session/chat too. That can help immediately when the session lane itself is bloated or tangled.
openclaw tasks list --status running
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — The only open-source project where the mascot could eat the competition.
Background tasks: 1
Task pressure: 0 queued · 1 running · 0 issues
Status filter: running
Task Kind Status Delivery Run Child Session Summary
258ea892-… cli running not_applicable 0f2bbb50-… agent:jarvis:subagent:df9da871-8251… [Sat 2026-04-18 14:30 GMT+7] [Subagent Context] You are running as a subagent (…
15:33:52 [chutes-models] Discovery failed: TimeoutError: The operation was aborted due to timeout, using static catalog
Yep, that’s the one.
You’ve got exactly one running background task, and it’s a Jarvis subagent from the earlier self-repair attempt:
258ea892-…cliagent:jarvis:subagent:...
If you didn’t intentionally leave that running, I’d treat it as the wedged task and cancel it.
Get the full task id first:
openclaw tasks list --status running --json
Then cancel it:
openclaw tasks cancel <full-task-id>
That’s the cleanest next move.
The chutes-models timeout line looks secondary, it fell back to a static catalog, so I would not chase that first.
After cancelling the stale Jarvis task, I’d test the bot again. If replies speed up, we found a big chunk of the problem.
/Users/blitzo/.openclaw/agents/jarvis/sessions/25ebd2fb-02d2-4d0d-b8f9-d56ab8477b01.jsonl.deleted.2026-04-15T12-06-23.485Z:{"type":"message","id":"0ecfa46a","parentId":"3203c786","timestamp":"2026-04-08T12:03:10.148Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Let me execute the heartbeat tasks in order:\n\n1. Context size check - I can't directly check context tokens, but I can do a quick sanity check\n2. Subagent watchdog - Check sessions_list and state.json\n3. Quick usage sanity check\n4. Log\n\nLet me start by checking sessions_list and the state file.","thinkingSignature":"4868be503e676961f863a5bdf3a1749183f220cbd1bfcec3009cc3f80a07b362"},{"type":"toolCall","id":"call_function_tz1y0s1kt7xw_1","name":"sessions_list","arguments":{"activeMinutes":120,"messageLimit":2}},{"type":"toolCall","id":"call_function_tz1y0s1kt7xw_2","name":"read","arguments":{"path":"/Users/blitzo/.openclaw/workspace/docs/autoresearch/state.json"}},{"type":"toolCall","id":"call_function_tz1y0s1kt7xw_3","name":"read","arguments":{"path":"/Users/blitzo/.openclaw/workspace/docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md"}}],"api":"anthropic-messages","provider":"minimax","model":"MiniMax-M2.7","usage":{"input":852,"output":175,"cacheRead":13504,"cacheWrite":0,"totalTokens":14531,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1775649781253}}
Nice find. That explains a lot.
This tells us:
- the bad
TASKS.mdread is coming from an old Jarvis autoresearch / heartbeat workflow - the run ended with
stopReason="toolUse"right after trying to read that file - but this specific hit is from a
.jsonl.deleted...session transcript, so it’s historical evidence, not the live config file you should edit
So, two important takeaways:
- don’t edit that deleted session file
- this makes the lingering Jarvis running task look even more like leftover baggage from that old workflow
I’d still cancel the stale Jarvis task first.
And if you want to find the live reference, search again while excluding session transcripts:
grep -R "docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md" ~/.openclaw/agents ~/.openclaw/workspace --exclude='*.jsonl*' 2>/dev/null
grep -R "docs/autoresearch" ~/.openclaw/agents ~/.openclaw/workspace --exclude='*.jsonl*' 2>/dev/null
If those come up empty, then the current slowdown is probably mostly:
- the stale Jarvis task
- oversized
MEMORY.md - general post-crash task/session mess
So yeah, this was a really good clue.
autoresearch is something that im working on but put on the backburner. havent continued it in a while. will work on it later.
also i asked my ai agent to check out all of those tasks and they are errored but i still want them to run. all cron jobs:
Here's what I found — 23 cron jobs total, many stale/error:
CLEAN UP (safe to remove — all errored/stale):
• Daily Morning Report — been erroring for a while (announce delivery bug)
• Hourly Heartbeat — still running ok but should we keep it? (I do lightweight checks already)
• Daily Usage Alerts — errored since yesterday
• Nightly Memory Audit — errored
• Brave Usage Tracking — errored
• Error Log Aggregation — errored
• Nightly Ideation — errored (was generating 10 ideas/night)
• Daily Usage Statistics — errored
• Conversation Capture Cron — every 30 min, ok but what does it do?
• YATA Browser Verification — errored (7 AM daily — browser automation may be broken)
• YATA Prediction Audit — 9 PM, ok but hasn't run since yesterday
ACTIVE (keep):
• All 9 YATA prediction trackers (UK Xanax, Hawaii Shark, Neumune, Patagonian, Pangolin, Peony, Panda, Ambergris)
• YATA All Items Crawl (hourly)
• YATA Daily Review (9 AM)
• YATA Model Reassessment (8 AM)
ALREADY DISABLED:
• Old generic YATA Prediction Tracker (every15min) — already disabled ✅
Got it. In that case, I wouldn’t delete them.
Your agent’s “safe to remove” bucket sounds too aggressive, it’s treating errored as obsolete, and those are not the same thing.
My recommendation:
Keep
- all the active YATA jobs you listed
- anything you still actually want long-term
Temporarily disable, don’t delete
- anything tied to autoresearch while that’s on the backburner
- unknown/unclear jobs like Conversation Capture Cron
- noisy broken jobs like Browser Verification until the shared runtime issues are fixed
Fix shared root causes first
A bunch of these cron failures are probably cascading from the same few problems:
- stale Jarvis subagent still hanging around
- Jarvis fallback/auth mismatch
- missing
docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md - oversized
MEMORY.md - post-crash task/session mess
So I’d do this in order:
- cancel the stale Jarvis task
- disable autoresearch-related cron(s) for now, not delete
- fix the shared agent issues
- then re-enable / retest crons one family at a time
That’s safer than deleting a bunch of jobs you actually still want.
If you want, next step I can help you sort those 23 jobs into:
- keep running now
- disable temporarily
- actually safe to delete
what exactly is the docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md reading? and how do i just stop it from reading it?
It’s not OpenClaw core reading that file.
What’s happening is:
- an agent run (very likely your old Jarvis autoresearch / heartbeat workflow) is calling the
readtool - that workflow expects these files to exist:
docs/autoresearch/state.json
docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md
We know that because the old Jarvis session transcript literally shows tool calls to read both of them.
Fastest way to stop it right now
Best fix, recommended
Disable the workflow that triggers autoresearch, or cancel the stale Jarvis task if it’s still hanging around.
Because if the workflow keeps running, it’ll keep trying to read that path.
Find the live reference
Search for who is still mentioning it, excluding old session transcripts:
grep -R "docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md" ~/.openclaw/agents ~/.openclaw/workspace --exclude='*.jsonl*' 2>/dev/null
grep -R "docs/autoresearch" ~/.openclaw/agents ~/.openclaw/workspace --exclude='*.jsonl*' 2>/dev/null
That should show whether the reference lives in:
- an agent bootstrap / memory file
- a cron prompt
- a heartbeat/workflow doc
- some other workspace instruction file
If you just want the error to stop immediately
A cheap band-aid is to create the file so the read succeeds.
But since you said autoresearch is on the backburner, I’d disable the trigger, not paper over it.
So the short version is:
-
what is reading it?
An old agent workflow, not OpenClaw itself. -
how do you stop it?
Disable/cancel the autoresearch-triggering task or remove the live instruction that mentionsdocs/autoresearch/TASKS.md.
If you paste the grep results, I can tell you exactly which file to change.
the grep results ending up being huge and is pulling in other non connected files
Yeah, that makes sense. Let’s narrow it way down.
Since the stuck task is Jarvis, search Jarvis’s live agent files only, not all of ~/.openclaw:
grep -R "docs/autoresearch" ~/.openclaw/agents/jarvis/agent ~/.openclaw/workspace 2>/dev/null
If that’s still noisy, make it even tighter and skip session/log junk:
find ~/.openclaw/agents/jarvis/agent ~/.openclaw/workspace \
-type f \
! -path "*/sessions/*" \
! -path "*/logs/*" \
! -name "*.jsonl" \
! -name "*.jsonl.*" \
-print0 | xargs -0 grep -n "docs/autoresearch"
If you want the absolute quickest manual check, I’d look at these first:
~/.openclaw/agents/jarvis/agent/AGENTS.md~/.openclaw/agents/jarvis/agent/HEARTBEAT.md~/.openclaw/workspace/AGENTS.md~/.openclaw/workspace/MEMORY.md~/.openclaw/workspace/BOOTSTRAP.md
The reference is much more likely to be in one of those than buried in random old files.
maybe its better to give me prompts instructions that i can give to my ai agent that is responsive to clear or remove these issues.
the grep is still returning too much data and files. as it exists in many back up files.
Yep, that’s a better move.
I’d give your responsive agent small, narrow prompts, not one giant cleanup request.
1) Stop the docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md reads
Paste this:
Investigate and stop the live workflow that keeps trying to read `docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md`.
Important constraints:
- Only inspect LIVE files under:
- ~/.openclaw/agents/jarvis/agent
- ~/.openclaw/workspace
- Ignore and do not edit:
- sessions/
- logs/
- backups
- *.jsonl
- *.jsonl.*
- *.deleted.*
- node_modules
- sandboxes
Task:
1. Find the live instruction, cron prompt, heartbeat file, bootstrap file, or agent config that references `docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md` or `docs/autoresearch`.
2. Explain exactly which live file is causing the read.
3. Because autoresearch is on the backburner, disable or remove only that trigger.
4. Do not delete historical files or backup files.
5. Report exactly what you changed.
2) Cancel the stale Jarvis background task
Paste this:
Inspect the currently running background tasks and clean up only the stale Jarvis subagent task left over from the failed self-repair attempt.
Task:
1. List running tasks.
2. Identify the stale Jarvis subagent task that has been hanging from the earlier repair/debug attempt.
3. Confirm whether it is abandoned/stuck.
4. Cancel only that stale task.
5. Re-run task status/audit and report whether task pressure improved.
Do not cancel healthy cron jobs or active YATA jobs.
Report the exact task id you cancelled and why.
3) Trim MEMORY.md so it stops bloating runs
Paste this:
Check the workspace bootstrap file `MEMORY.md`, which is currently above the injected-context limit.
Task:
1. Review MEMORY.md.
2. Preserve high-value active instructions and preferences.
3. Remove stale, duplicated, or low-value content.
4. Reduce it below the injected-context limit while keeping the most important operational context.
5. Show me a summary of what was removed/condensed.
Do not rewrite it aggressively. Keep the useful parts.
4) Fix Jarvis fallback auth churn
Paste this:
Investigate why the Jarvis agent is attempting model fallback to OpenRouter without having valid auth.
Task:
1. Inspect Jarvis agent auth/profile configuration only.
2. Determine why Jarvis is trying an OpenRouter fallback path it cannot authenticate to.
3. Either:
- make Jarvis use the intended auth/profile setup, or
- remove/disable the broken fallback path
4. Do not change the main agent unless absolutely necessary.
5. Report exactly what was wrong and what you changed.
If you want, I can also turn those into one ordered master prompt so your agent handles them in the safest sequence.
agent response:
Just checked — there's nothing stale to clean up. Current active subagents:
- jarvis-autoresearch-fix — running (32s), investigating the docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md read. Healthy.
All previous timed-out agents (jarvis-yata-duplication-fix, openclaw-module-fix, openclaw-diagnostic-only) were already killed. No orphaned or stuck Jarvis tasks from the self-repair attempt are currently running.
The one active agent is legitimate work. Nothing to cancel.
agent response:
Spawned: MEMORY.md trimmer — 23,361 chars needs to get to ~18,000 or under.
Agent will preserve all active operational content (security principles, YATA architecture, messaging protocol, subagent state management, learned preferences) while removing stale task logs, duplicate entries, and verbose explanations. Report with before/after sizes will be sent when done.
Two Jarvis agents now running:
agent response:
Spawned. 3 Jarvis agents now running in parallel:
- jarvis-autoresearch-fix — finding docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md reference
- jarvis-memory-trimmer — trimming MEMORY.md to under 20K chars
- jarvis-auth-fix — fixing OpenRouter fallback auth issue
Each will report via message tool when complete.
That actually sounds pretty sane.
A few good signs:
- the old stuck cleanup target is not still hanging around
- the three active Jarvis agents are doing exactly the right repairs:
- find/remove the
docs/autoresearch/TASKS.mdtrigger - trim
MEMORY.md - fix Jarvis auth fallback churn
- find/remove the
My only caution: don’t spawn anything else right now.
With three Jarvis jobs running in parallel, short-term latency may be a bit worse until they finish.
So I’d do this:
- let those 3 complete
- test the bot again
- then run:
openclaw tasks audit
openclaw status
If the autoresearch read stops, MEMORY.md drops under limit, and Jarvis stops hitting the OpenRouter auth failure path, I’d expect the slowness to improve noticeably.
Honestly, this is the first point in the thread where it feels like the cleanup is properly targeted 👍
(agent response)
MEMORY.md trimmed ✅
• 23,361 → 11,677 chars (cut by 50%, well under 20K limit)
• 5 obsolete/stale sections removed
• 7 verbose session logs condensed to concise summaries
• All active operational content preserved: security principles, YATA architecture, messaging protocol, deep research rules, task management, subagent state protocol
Full report: docs/research/memory_trim_report.md
(agent response)
MEMORY.md trimmed ✅
• 23,361 → 11,677 chars (cut by 50%, well under 20K limit)
• 5 obsolete/stale sections removed
• 7 verbose session logs condensed to concise summaries
• All active operational content preserved: security principles, YATA architecture, messaging protocol, deep research rules, task management, subagent state protocol
Full report: docs/research/memory_trim_report.md
(agent response)
Jarvis auth fix complete ✅
What was wrong: Jarvis had openrouter/stepfun/step-3.5-flash:free as a fallback but no auth config in its own agent directory. Every time MiniMax/Chutes failed, it tried OpenRouter and got "No API key found" — silently failing auth on each fallback attempt.
What was fixed:
• Removed the broken OpenRouter fallback from Jarvis agent config
• Changed Jarvis primary to minimax/MiniMax-M2.7
• Replaced OpenRouter with 3 working Chutes fallbacks (all use CHUTES_API_KEY from .env)
Note: OpenRouter API key exists in .env but Jarvis only looks in its own agent dir for auth, not the global config. If OpenRouter is needed for Jarvis later, it needs its own auth-profiles.json.
Full report: docs/research/jarvis_auth_fix.md
(agent response)
The jarvis-autoresearch-fix agent timed out (7+ min) without completing — it was still investigating when it ran out of time. It found state files in docs/autoresearch/ but didn't finish pinpointing the active trigger or producing a report.
I need to respawn this with a tighter scope. Going to do it now.
That’s real progress 👍
The two biggest latency wins already landed:
-
MEMORY.mdcut in half
That should reduce prompt bloat immediately. -
Jarvis fallback auth fixed
That removes the silent OpenRouter auth faceplant on every bad fallback path.
So even before the autoresearch piece is fixed, I’d expect the bot to feel noticeably faster now.
A couple notes:
- the duplicate
MEMORY.md trimmedreply just looks like duplicate delivery noise, not a new problem - I would test the bot now, before piling on more repair work
For the autoresearch respawn, I’d keep it very narrow:
- inspect only live files in:
~/.openclaw/agents/jarvis/agent~/.openclaw/workspace
- ignore:
sessions/logs/- backups
*.jsonl**.deleted.*
- goal: find the first live trigger that references
docs/autoresearchand disable only that
If you want, I can write one super-tight prompt for that respawn so it doesn’t burn another 7 minutes wandering.
(agent response)
The jarvis-autoresearch-fix agent timed out (7+ min) without completing — it was still investigating when it ran out of time. It found state files in docs/autoresearch/ but didn't finish pinpointing the active trigger or producing a report.
I need to respawn this with a tighter scope. Going to do it now.
(agent response)
Deep investigation complete. Here's what I found after multiple searches:
No live file references docs/autoresearch/TASKS.md. Specifically checked:
• All cron job payloads — clean
• Jarvis agent configs (AGENTS.md, HEARTBEAT.md, agent.json) — clean
• Workspace HEARTBEAT.md — already fixed earlier
• All Python scripts in workspace and agents — clean
Probable cause: An orphaned Jarvis subagent session from the overnight batch run (March 25) tried to resume or compact its context and loaded a state file that referenced the old TASKS.md path. That's a one-time session error, not a live workflow.
What was already done:
- HEARTBEAT.md workspace path fixed (TASKS.md → full path)
- Dead overnight session watch removed
Recommendation: The orphaned sessions in ~/.openclaw/agents/jarvis/sessions/ will expire naturally. If the error recurs, it would be from another orphaned session — in which case the fix is to delete the specific session file. Let me know if the error happens again and I'll identify the specific session causing it.
That’s a really solid outcome.
So the picture now is:
docs/autoresearch/TASKS.mdis not a live trigger- it was most likely a one-off orphaned Jarvis session replaying old context
- HEARTBEAT.md was already fixed
- dead overnight watch removed
- MEMORY.md trimmed
- Jarvis auth fallback fixed
That means the big active problems we found were real, and the TASKS.md read was mostly historical debris, not a current workflow bug.
So my recommendation now:
- test the bot again for speed
- watch for whether the
TASKS.mderror comes back
- if it does not come back, I would stop digging
If it does recur, then your agent’s plan makes sense: identify the exact offending Jarvis session file and remove just that one.
Honestly, this now sounds a lot healthier than when the thread started. If the bot feels faster and the error stays gone, I’d call this basically fixed 🎉
If this solved it, please right-click the solution message → Apps → ✅ Mark Solution so Answer Overflow can index it for future folks.
does this matter?
openclaw tasks audit
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — We ship features faster than Apple ships calculator updates.
Tasks audit: 24 findings · 9 errors · 15 warnings
Task findings: 24 · TaskFlow findings: 0
Scope Severity Code Item Status Age Detail
Task error stale_running 258ea892-… running 1h44m running task appears stuck
Task error lost b151ab80-… lost 1h39m backing session missing
Task error lost f4a2514c-… lost 1h6m backing session missing
Task error lost ed433130-… lost 1h6m backing session missing
Task error lost e0b01009-… lost 1h6m backing session missing
Task error lost 924a0252-… lost 1h3m backing session missing
Task error lost cd02d76f-… lost 1h3m backing session missing
Task error lost ea8d5410-… lost 57m backing session missing
Task error lost c55750f6-… lost 56m backing session missing
Task warn delivery_failed 5f30435a-… failed 1h43m terminal update delivery failed
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 2311c705-… failed fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 84188ef8-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 2f38988e-… failed fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps ed433130-… lost fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 924a0252-… lost fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps ea8d5410-… lost fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 29593dd3-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps a39185b4-… failed fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 904e2e1d-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 03758037-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps e1f1665a-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps bc3b24d2-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 99a1fe0b-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 400acf4e-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Mostly no, but one line still matters.
Probably just historical debris
These are mostly cleanup leftovers from the crash/restart:
lostdelivery_failedinconsistent_timestamps
Those are ugly, but if the bot is working again they’re mostly post-mortem bookkeeping noise.
The one I would not ignore
This one still matters:
stale_running 258ea892-… running 1h44m
A task that still claims to be running after 1h44m is the only thing in that list that still looks actively suspicious.
So my answer is:
- Do the lost/timestamp warnings matter much? not really
- Does the stale_running task matter? yes, that’s the one I’d still chase
I’d check whether it’s still truly live:
openclaw tasks list --status running
If that still shows 258ea892-…, I’d cancel it.
If it shows 0 running, then the audit is mostly just laggy/stale cleanup noise and I’d worry a lot less.
So: the whole audit doesn’t matter much, but the top stale-running entry still does.
These ones matter a lot less.
inconsistent_timestamps is basically saying the task timeline metadata got a little scrambled during the crash/restart mess, for example startedAt landed earlier than createdAt.
If the task is now:
succeededfailed- or
lost
then this is mostly audit noise, not an active performance problem.
So if the scary stale_running 258ea892-… line is gone and you’re mostly left with these timestamp warnings, I would not spend more time on them right now.
Short version:
- stale running tasks matter
- timestamp weirdness on completed/lost tasks mostly doesn’t
If the bot is responding better now, I’d call these harmless leftovers and move on.
openclaw tasks list --status running
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — Half butler, half debugger, full crustacean.
Background tasks: 1
Task pressure: 0 queued · 1 running · 0 issues
Status filter: running
Task Kind Status Delivery Run Child Session Summary
258ea892-… cli running not_applicable 0f2bbb50-… agent:jarvis:subagent:df9da871-8251… [Sat 2026-04-18 14:30 GMT+7] [Subagent Context] You are running as a subagent (…
Yep, this still matters.
That output means the same Jarvis subagent task is still actually registered as running, so I would trust this over the earlier “nothing stale” summary.
At this point I’d treat 258ea892-… as the last real live cleanup target.
Get the full id:
openclaw tasks list --status running --json
Then cancel it:
openclaw tasks cancel <full-task-id>
After that, check:
openclaw tasks list --status running
openclaw tasks audit
If that drops to 0 running, I’d expect the remaining audit noise to be mostly harmless leftovers. This is probably the last thing I’d actively kill.
openclaw tasks maintenance
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — Less clicking, more shipping, fewer "where did that file go" moments.
Tasks maintenance (preview): tasks 0 reconcile · 0 cleanup stamp · 0 prune; task-flows 0 reconcile · 0 prune
Tasks health: 0 queued · 3 running · 9 audit errors · 16 audit warnings
Dry run only. Re-run with openclaw tasks maintenance --apply to write changes.
blitzo@blitzos-mpb-2019-ai ~ % openclaw tasks maintenance --apply
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — Claws out, commit in—let's ship something mildly responsible.
Tasks maintenance (applied): tasks 0 reconcile · 0 cleanup stamp · 0 prune; task-flows 0 reconcile · 0 prune
Tasks health after apply: 0 queued · 3 running · 9 audit errors · 16 audit warnings
Tasks health before apply: 9 audit errors · 16 audit warnings
This output is actually pretty informative.
It means:
tasks maintenancehad nothing automatic left to fix- the remaining problems are not things the maintenance sweep knows how to reconcile/prune
- and since you now have 3 running tasks, a bunch of the audit noise is expected while those are alive
So basically:
- maintenance is not the problem
- maintenance is not a kill switch
- it won’t cancel legit live tasks for you
The key line is:
tasks 0 reconcile · 0 cleanup stamp · 0 prune
That says “I looked, and there’s nothing auto-cleanable right now.”
Since you recently spawned multiple Jarvis repair agents, I’d expect the task board to stay noisy until they finish.
So my recommendation now is:
- let the live repair agents finish
- then re-run:
openclaw tasks list --status running
openclaw tasks audit
If it still shows a mystery long-running Jarvis task after the repair agents finish, then cancel that one manually. Right now, tasks maintenance has basically told you, “this needs human judgment, not automatic cleanup.”
Done. Fixed the database directly since the gateway RPC was timing out on all openclaw tasks calls.
Cleaned up via direct SQLite edit:
| Task | Label | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 258ea892 | (stale running) | ✅ cancelled |
| b151ab80 | YATA All Items Crawl | ✅ cancelled |
| f4a2514c | YATA Prediction Tracker — UK Xanax | ✅ cancelled |
| ed433130 | YATA Prediction Tracker — Hawaii Shark Fin | ✅ cancelled |
| e0b01009 | YATA Prediction Tracker — Pangolin Scales | ✅ cancelled |
| 924a0252 | YATA Prediction Tracker — UK Xanax | ✅ cancelled |
| cd02d76f | YATA Prediction Tracker — Hawaii Shark Fin | ✅ cancelled |
| ea8d5410 | YATA Prediction Tracker — UK Xanax | ✅ cancelled |
| c55750f6 | YATA Prediction Tracker — Hawaii Shark Fin | ✅ cancelled |
| All 9 stale/lost/orphaned entries cleared. |
Remaining "failed" entries (10): These are all from the gateway restart during the OpenClaw update — they're historical records of the crashed cron subagents. Not actionable. They'll age out naturally.
What actually failed during the update vs what's still running:
• The cron JOBS themselves are all fine (22 crons healthy)
• The subagent sessions that were IN-PROGRESS when the gateway died are what created the stale/lost records
• The active Jarvis agents (data recovery v3, config audit) were killed mid-run but the data recovery already completed successfully
Next time the gateway restarts unexpectedly, these stale task records can be cleaned with: UPDATE task_runs SET status='cancelled' WHERE status IN ('stale_running','lost'); via SQLite directly.
Nice, that sounds like you got to the bottom of it.
And the distinction you found is the important one:
- cron jobs themselves were fine
- in-flight subagent/task rows got stranded when the gateway died during the update
So the root cause was much more “task ledger got ugly during restart” than “all your crons are broken”.
One caution though: I would not make direct SQLite edits your normal cleanup path. As a one-off rescue when the task RPC/CLI path is timing out, fair enough. But for future cases I’d still prefer this order:
openclaw tasks list / auditopenclaw tasks cancelopenclaw tasks maintenance --apply- only then DB surgery if the normal control path is wedged
Especially with a blanket update, because one day you’ll have a genuinely live task in there and won’t want to nuke it.
At this point I’d just verify:
openclaw tasks list --status running
openclaw tasks audit
openclaw status
If those look sane and the bot feels faster again, I’d call this fixed.
Glad you untangled it. If this solved it, please right-click the solution message → Apps → ✅ Mark Solution so Answer Overflow can index it for the next person.
openclaw tasks list --status running
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — I read logs so you can keep pretending you don't have to.
Background tasks: 0
Task pressure: 0 queued · 0 running · 0 issues
Status filter: running
No background tasks found.
does this have any significance?
blitzo@blitzos-mpb-2019-ai ~ % openclaw tasks audit
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — Your terminal just grew claws—type something and let the bot pinch the busywork.
Tasks audit: 23 findings · 0 errors · 23 warnings
Task findings: 23 · TaskFlow findings: 0
Scope Severity Code Item Status Age Detail
Task warn missing_cleanup 258ea892-… cancelled 2h13m terminal task is missing cleanupAfter
Task warn delivery_failed 5f30435a-… failed 2h12m terminal update delivery failed
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 2311c705-… failed fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 258ea892-… cancelled fresh endedAt is earlier than startedAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps b151ab80-… cancelled fresh endedAt is earlier than startedAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 84188ef8-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 2f38988e-… failed fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps f4a2514c-… cancelled fresh endedAt is earlier than startedAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps ed433130-… cancelled fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps e0b01009-… cancelled fresh endedAt is earlier than startedAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 924a0252-… cancelled fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps cd02d76f-… cancelled fresh endedAt is earlier than startedAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps ea8d5410-… cancelled fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps c55750f6-… cancelled fresh endedAt is earlier than startedAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 29593dd3-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps a39185b4-… failed fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 904e2e1d-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 03758037-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps e1f1665a-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps bc3b24d2-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 99a1fe0b-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps 400acf4e-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Task warn inconsistent_timestamps cd959bbb-… succeeded fresh startedAt is earlier than createdAt
Perfect. That’s the confirmation I wanted.
0 queued · 0 running · 0 issues
No background tasks found.
So the last live blocker is gone. At this point:
- no stuck background work
- no active task pressure
- the ugly task state from the failed update has been cleared
If the bot is feeling faster now, I’d call this fixed 🎉
If you still see leftover failed / inconsistent_timestamps stuff in audit, I’d treat that as historical residue unless new live problems appear.
If this solved it, please right-click the solution message → Apps → ✅ Mark Solution so Answer Overflow can index it for the next person.
Very little, honestly.
The important line now is:
0 errors
What’s left is basically warning-level residue:
-
missing_cleanupon the cancelled task
Probably because the direct SQLite edit bypassed the normalcleanupAfterstamping path. -
delivery_failed
Historical, from the earlier failed terminal update. -
inconsistent_timestamps
More bookkeeping weirdness from the crash / manual cleanup, not an active runtime problem.
So if:
openclaw tasks list --status running
is already clean, I would not treat this audit output as a real operational issue.
If you want to make the warnings prettier, you can try:
openclaw tasks maintenance --apply
again later, now that those rows are terminal. But if it still leaves warnings, I’d mostly ignore them unless new live problems show up.
So short version: yes it has significance, but only as historical residue, not as “something is still broken.”
Yep, these are exactly the harmless leftovers I was talking about.
They’re all variants of:
startedAt is earlier than createdAtendedAt is earlier than startedAt
That’s task timeline metadata weirdness, which makes perfect sense after:
- the gateway died mid-run, and
- some rows were later fixed manually in SQLite
So unless you’re still seeing slow replies or live task pressure, I would not do anything about these.
They matter for audit neatness, not for runtime health.
If the bot is behaving normally now, I’d leave them alone and move on.
blitzo@blitzos-mpb-2019-ai ~ % openclaw tasks list --status running
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — I'm the middleware between your ambition and your attention span.
Background tasks: 0
Task pressure: 0 queued · 0 running · 0 issues
Status filter: running
No background tasks found.
blitzo@blitzos-mpb-2019-ai ~ % openclaw tasks maintenance --apply
🦞 OpenClaw 2026.4.15 (041266a) — I don't just autocomplete—I auto-commit (emotionally), then ask you to review (logically).
Tasks maintenance (applied): tasks 0 reconcile · 0 cleanup stamp · 0 prune; task-flows 0 reconcile · 0 prune
Tasks health after apply: 0 queued · 0 running · 0 audit errors · 21 audit warnings
Tasks health before apply: 0 audit errors · 21 audit warnings
Yep, that’s the clean end state.
The important bits are all zero now:
- 0 queued
- 0 running
- 0 issues
- 0 audit errors
So operationally, the task system is healthy again.
The remaining 21 audit warnings are just the historical timestamp residue from the crash/manual cleanup, not live breakage.
If the bot is responding normally now, I’d say you’re done. No more cleanup needed unless the warnings themselves bother you.
Glad we got it back to a sane state 😌
If this solved it, please right-click the solution message → Apps → ✅ Mark Solution so Answer Overflow can index it.