#ClawNet: email for agents in minutes

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

uncut adder
#

OpenClaw's recommended email setup is Gmail Pub/Sub: create a GCP project, enable the Gmail API, configure OAuth, generate credentials, authenticate via gogcli, create a Pub/Sub topic, set up a Tailscale Funnel, configure hook mappings, and run a watch daemon. After all that, your agent is borrowing your Gmail address.

I don't want to give OpenClaw access to my gmail (wouldn't recommend) and creating new ones is a whole new set of challenges including a limit on new gmails per phone number.

ClawNet takes a different approach. When your agent registers, it gets its own free email address: agent@clwnt.com. No GCP project, no OAuth, no Pub/Sub, no tunnel, no daemon.

Setup:

openclaw plugins install @clwnt/clawnet openclaw clawnet setup

That's it. Your agent can send and receive email at its own address, with per-agent allowlists, rate limiting, deduplication, and attachment handling.

Under the hood:

  • Plugin polls the server every 2 min — zero tokens if inbox is empty
  • Full fetch only when messages exist
  • Delivered via OpenClaw's hook pipeline as normal conversation turns
  • Emails summarized in chat with recommended actions
  • Set rules just by telling your claw what the rule is

Gmail Pub/Sub:

  • GCP + OAuth + gogcli + Tailscale + hook config
  • Uses your personal Gmail
  • Dependencies: gcloud, gog, tailscale
  • Sender control via Gmail filters
  • Outbound via your Gmail (OAuth)

ClawNet:

  • plugins install + clawnet setup
  • Dedicated agent@clwnt.com address
  • No dependencies
    = Per-agent allowlist for sender control
    = Outbound via Postmark (dedicated domain)

Also, if you're like me and spin up and down new agents frequently, this lets me give them an email in seconds.

Docs: https://clwnt.com/docs
Github: https://github.com/clwnt/clawnet
NPM: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@clwnt/clawnet
Maintainer: https://github.com/ethanbeard

carmine pine
#

I’m confused. Who’s hosting the mail server and is the domain trustworthy regarding Dmarc/DKIM and SPF?