#UKRS2 in NML Dev Thread
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
nice
peckett b2?
though if you have one already (from what i can see on the github you do)
then mine could just be a variant
that one is definitely going to be considered. Ideally I'd have something slightly earlier, but that's a good option. Just lacking in stats
yeah it doesn't even have a wikipedia page
Just a thought, if anyone fancies making some particularly new trains, but I've a list of 3... Two of which already operate in the UK, and I don't know if it's in this pack or not, the other two operate in continental Europe, but would be really well suited to the UK network:
- Stadler FLIRT (already in UK) [Class 745s and 755s]
- CAF Civity (already in UK) [Class 195, 331, 397?, 196, 197]
- Alstom Coradia [France: Regiolis trains]
very nice
Ivatt 2-6-0 FINISHED
looking through the github
huh, didn't know the tube trains came in 2CC
they all are?! cool
Yup, all Tube Stock has always had 2CC, but for some reason, never got it applied in Company Colour mode
I might borrow RUKTS sprites for it, but not sure
not a huge fan of tube stuff myself, and don't wanna steal all of RUKTS for this set :P
what we have is a pretty decent selection of underground stock
reminder that i finished the ivatt 2-6-0
I could do some new sprites closer to this style than RUKTS, as there are currently no sub-surface tube trains in your set
technically do with the 4-4-0 and 0-4-4 metropolitan loco's
You're free to contribute if you'd like! I'm more than happy to include anything that's drawn, it's just that tube stuff isn't necessarily on my 'wishlist', you know?
I was going to say, if we could get some of the sub-surface types of tube too that'd be grand
nice
so, now that the ivatt small 2-6-0 is finished, whats next?
for the time being, i am making the standard 4mt largo mogul
i'm using the GWR mogul as a base and kit-bashing the jubilee boiler, cab and smokebox on top
standard 4mt 2-6-0 finished
There’s more than one 4MT?
dunno if this was mentioned already, but there's a bit of a gap in the 1880's where there aren't any new locomotives. Maybe something like the LB&SCR B1 could be added there?
0-4-2 tender engine?
Seems do-able
Though it'll have to wait till Tomorrow when my computer is turned on again
Currently on my phone about to go to bed
If ivatt is a tank then yes that’s the one i know
Reminds me, a Stirling Single, either as a "body swap" for the Spinner or as an earlier loco, would be nice. Some early "races to the North"
Oh yeah, good catch. Between 1873 and 1889 nothing gets introduced
Stirling Singles were introduced in 1870 but, built in batches in 1870, 1884 and 1894, so, seem to fit that bill too 🙂
a Metropolitan Vickers would be nice to have, too
Are there any other similar gaps? In fact, aren't there only 7 or so locos prior to 1889?
12 prior to 1889
check this
I was close enough. Still arguably too few?
Are bold locos the ones you've added to the set?
bold loco's are ones I plan to add but don't have sprites for
Ah, ok. Is there a code for locos that weren't in the original UKRS set or not?
no but I can add something for that, give me a short while
I'm just compiling a list of all the pre-1890 UK locomotives that have Wikipedia articles, and then I'll extend it with those that have pictures.
there is now
Question, can people use the filters here without needing any extra rights?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16vMzKuZGtlvkoHnnCJABeYOq5GVq1jD0U33m8C78EzI/edit?usp=sharing
Good question, I don't know.
I can
@snow carbon Did you see this?
Yeah, send that list when you have it, please
There are a couple of post-1890 ones, but I think they're too important not to be in the set.
Hold on, do we not have the LB&SCR A1s in this set???
Nop, we do not
So I'm working on getting dates a bit more detailed, and the locomotive that I think is the bases for the 0-6-0 Goods has been built in numerous iterations between 1867 and 1912
In the current set, we get the Long Boiler in 1855, have to make do with that until the Goods in 1873, which we're stuck with until 1911's Freight
What I could do is split the Goods into 3, one in 1867, one in 1873, and one in 1896
This way, we'd have more variety in cargo loco's in that period, and could always replace them later on with more varied designs of those era's.
Do, or not do?
Made another update to the sheet, listed some new additions, some possible new additions, and did some research into introduction/retirement dates. There's still some missing, so if anyone can fill in any of the red ?'s on the right, please do
Oh, there are plenty of other goods locomotives from that era. I'm guessing the goods engine you're referring to is the LNWR DX Goods?
No, the DX goods is not the 'Goods' Loco in Vanilla UKRS2
So... What is, and why don't we have the single most ubiquitous steam locomotive in the history of UK railways?
We get the NER 1001 as that era's cargo loco
Huh, ok... Well, I suggest we make use of at least one of the 943 DX Goods locos that were built between 1858 and 1872...
Or the 500 Special DX locos that were built between 1881 and 1898...
If sprited, we could add the DX goods to 1858-1872, as an alternative to 1852's NER 1000/'Long Boiler', and the Cab or Special DX as an option from 1871-1898, as an alternative to 1873's GNR J6?
I'd still advocate for a new type loco to be introduced in the 1860s (currently have J7 for 1867) and 1890s (currently have the J5 for 1896), so you've got options that weren't introduced in the 1850s
I did also suggest the Stirling Single for the 1880s, as one of the batches was built in 1884, unless that is too similar to the Lady of the Lake/Problem or the Spinner. (Different generation to either IMHO but)
Could also suggest the Webb Coal Tank, or the Experiment (or follow up, Dreadnought) Class
Oh, there are loads of L&NWR locos we can choose from. I'm still not even halfway through putting that list together, there are so many. And that's only the ones worthy of Wikipedia articles!
Well, I am an LNWR fan 😄
There are tons of other companies as well!
The Experiments and Dreadnoughts are interesting as they are "Double Singles"
Yeah, I still can't get my head round that Whyte notation...
Indeed, some GWR or GNR stuff from the period would be good. Midland all gets a bit...samey. Small engine policy being what it was
"Oh look, another 2-4-0, 4-4-0 or 0-6-0, how original"
North British, Highland, London Tilbury Southend, London Southestern, Somerset and Dorset Joint Railway?
*Southwestern
North London?
Yep.
CR being Caledonian (missed that one)
L&SR (now this is an obscure one I only found out about this morning!)
The Caledonian Single might be another nice "palette swap" for the Spinner
Ooh, um, hmmm
Liverpool and, something?
It was absorbed by the Midland quite early on, hence the obscurity... Leicester & Swannington Railway
Ah
Nowadays known as the Ivanhoe Line.
I thought maybe Liverpool and Southport (couldnt remember the "S" name), the one that electrified quite rapidly
Used to terminate at Leicester West Bridge...
You mean the Liverpool Overhead Railway?
Ooh, the Liverpool Overhead Railway! We need some of their locos in this set!
Possibly? I might be thinking of the other one around there, that used LNWR electrics in the end. One and the same? Memory is fuzzy
well this one's gonna be interesting
The Liverpool Overhead Railway (known locally as the Dockers' Umbrella or Ovee) was an overhead railway in Liverpool which operated along the Liverpool Docks and opened in 1893 with lightweight electric multiple units. The railway had a number of world firsts: it was the first electric elevated railway, the first to use automatic signalling, ele...
im taking a crack at the gladstone B1
it has driving wheens only two inches smaller than the gresley pacifics
Just checked. L&Y Electrification of the Liverpool to Southport route, connecting with the LOR. So, very closely related
Good luck!
thank you
idea for the B1
a 0-4-2 version of the spinner or the lady
OPINION NEEDED
left or right?
I like the top more on the left but the bottom from the right
it is hard to tell tbh
It turns out I'd made a mistake, the 'Spinner' is a Stirling Single :p
I had it listed as a Midland Railway 115, but that one's far too late to be the Spinner
Stirling was nowhere near the only man to design a single...
i'd say its a johnson single
the features match up better
no outside cylinder, the yellow bit where the axle bearing is, the dome above the driver
This would all be a lot easier if the old pikkawiki was still up, it used to have a lot of uh
"This vehicle is based on X!"
another thing that gives it away is the smokebox
on the stirling the smokebox doesn't curve in with the boiler, it slopes out and around the cylinders
couldnt you just ask him?
yeah they're in this discord, new tag tho
Pruple iirc
Yeah, I know, just haven't gotten around to it. Managed nicely with research so far on most things, but will probably ask after dinner
right, how does this look?
decided to go with the lady instead of the spinner as it was a better size compared to the tender
I think it looks good
https://www.lner.info/locos/N/n8.php Could this also fill the gap in the 1880's, maybe as a general purpose tank engine
Describes the LNER T.W.Worsdell N8 (NER Class B) 0-6-2T Locomotives
I have added a second tab to the document
There is now a timeline
showing what gets introduced when, and in roughly what class it fits
italicized, underlined trains are suggestions that lack sprites. If just underlined they're suggestions with usable sprites
bolded ones are ones I definitely want to have
anything with neither is going to be included no matter what, since they have sprites already
yeah, that's getting updated
just haven't gotten around to it
been mostly preoccupied with being sick and figuring out loco's to include today
ah ok
Well, okay, you're right that the Spinner is a Midland Railway 115 Class
But
Later in life the Stirling Singles received Domed boilers
on the doc, what's the distinction between "Passenger" and "Express Passenger"?
probably the loco's top speed
ahh that makes sense
Essentially yes. Express Passenger is going to be your elite, top level express trains. Simply "Passenger" can mean any service.
So, the 2-6-4T, Black 5 and 4-6-2 Pacific are all Passenger, but, you wouldn't want a Pacific handling suburban services, or a 2-6-4T on a long distance express, hence the different terms.
generally 90+ is express
so that's the Jubilee, Klondyke(s) and the various pacifics
anything below that is regular passenger
also if you're still looking for a ~1890s saddle tank, this could work
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%26YR_Class_23
do we have a B17?
Would be nice. I say that a lot, but, any Big Four or before stuff I welcome
mostly cause i wanna do this version of them
wait hang on
since when did they make it to BR?!
Ah yes, the Baby A4s
yep, thinking about making them for the grf
By the way
anyone got feedback on some of the suggestions I've put in the document?
I need to clean up the list soon, I think, make suggestions a bit clear >.>
okay, added a tab to track suggested locomotive additions, let me know if there's anything I should add, as well as of course your opinions on the additions
The brute. Large Freight Tank engine. Perhaps the 0-8-4Ts, what were they Robinson S1s ?
Ah is that the same as the 8H you have as the Hump Shunter?
I already have the similar NER Class X (4-8-0T) and GCR Class 8H(0-8-4T) for 1909 and 1907 respectively, are there earlier options? (Pre-1900)
similar, but different
Looking it up, 8H and S1 are the same class (8H was the GCR Class, S1 being LNER)
So, hmm, something pre-1900 for that kind of weight class. Difficult
Only thing that comes to mind is the LNWR Coal Tank
if none exist, that's fine
They were only 2Fs though, but, from 1881
For the kind of heavy tank engines in that class, they all came into being around the Edwardian period. I guess coal traffic was at its zenith
The GCR 8H, the NER Class X, the LNWR 1185, GNR L1, L&Y Class 32, etc etc, all between 1903 and 1911
There is a Port Talbot one from 1899 but that's barely what you want. Yes pre 1900 but, eh
These are from 1896, so slightly earlier than the Port Talbot ones https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Railway_Class_H
The Barry Railway class H was a small class of seven 0-8-2T tank locomotives built for the Barry Railway by Sharp Stewart in 1896. When they were introduced they were the first locomotives in Britain to use the 0-8-2 wheel arrangement.
👍 listed it, I think that fits
a very ungainly looking engine
No, but working towards releasing a first version soon
Opinion Question time. Is this train primarily green (because the boiler is) or primarily blue (because the tender and the outside bits are)
mostly blue because there appears to be more blue pixels
sure, there's more blue pixels, but the blue pixels aren't mainly on what I would call the main part of the locomotive, hence my question
I'd say that the green and blue should be swapped except on the tender
so currently green would be primary
you get both options, it's just a matter of deciding if this is the default/CC1 Primary option, or if swapped is the default/CC1 Primary option
i think that should be the primary livery
I've always felt that was a strange way to 2cc those locos but, Pikka be Pikka
Well this is an interesting turn of events
i didn't know the lady has a stirling single style smokebox
Meaning i can make the stirling single a thing
and here it is:
the 4-2-2 Stirling
Noice
I have had a thunk
4-6-2 Pacific II (A3) - 1930
4-6-2 Princess Royal - 1933
Now, I love me a Princess Royal, I do, LMS fan boy right here. Especially with the Fowler tender. Woo. Anyway. But I've been thinking about what Fairy said about not having a bunch of nearly identical locos
Now, the Stirling Single has that nice introduction date, slides right in to a lovely gap between the Lady of the Lake/Problem in the 1860s, and the Midland Spinner in the 1890s(?)
But, I am wondering, are the stats of a Princess Royal close enough (for government work) that it could just work as a bodyswap variant for the Pacific II/A3?
No
Well, that answers that 😄
I mean we have no (real, practical) limitations on loco IDs etc these days so its not an issue it being separate. I was just musing 🙂 and I am happy it being separate, as I said, LMS fan that I am
Similar thoughts about a GWR King (which I believe is much closer to one of the two, I remember reading, I can't recall which though)
the jubilee?
The King is sort of, well, yes it's a 4-6-0 but its something else really
I am no expert on the GWR, from what I gather though, the Castle is the rough equivalent to the Black Five/Jubilee
The King was the GWR showing off somewhat, "look!, we can do with a 4-6-0 what you guys need a Pacific to do, albeit with a rather mega axle loading for most of our lines"
I'll see if I can find some figures
``
LMS Jubilee - 26,610 lbf
LMS Royal Scot - 33,150 lbf
LMS Princess Royal - 40,286 lbf
LNER B12 - 21,969 lbf
LNER B17 - 25,380 lbf
LNER A3 - 30,362 lbf
GWR Hall - 27,275 lbf
GWR Castle - 31,625 lbf
GWR King - 40,300 lbf
``
I could find some SR locos to compare to but, I think the point is made. The King was mental
Also
I'm getting to the point where soon I'll be able to start coding stuff
Need to run some tests on some things, then begin doing stats
(tried to find relatively comparative types, albeit the B12 is older than the rest. Otherwise they're all 1920s and early 30s designs)
Ah that was it, sorry, yes, the Princess Royal was, much as it pains me, essentially a Pacific-ised and LMS-ised King
As the tractive efforts bear out
I mean, I think its fine to include
Also if anyone wants to try their hand at spriting some of the tank engines listed in the suggestions page, I'd appreciate it
Oh for sure. What I am meaning is, the King could be a variant for it, or it for the King etc, as my earlier thought was having for the A3 (I'd mixed up which engines were similar, of course, Stanier being an ex-GWR man, it'd make sense the Princess was a redressed King)
Ah, but the Princess is a 4-6-2 and the King a 4-6-0, so I wouldn't make them variants of eachother
Otherwise near identical though. Perhaps a 4-6-X 'Royal', and the variants could be 4-6-0 'King' and 4-6-2 'Princess'
As, wheel arrangement really means nothing in game, and sprite wise, well, you could have a variant of a Pug be a hovertank for all the game is concerned. Two express steam locomotives, introduced within 5 years of each other with exceptionally similar performance seems a bit...crowded, yet i'd still like to see more GWR representation (love all the tanks, but need some mainline engines to work the expresses and such)
My issue with that is that it's a little weird to be doing that for just those two, when every other instance of variants actually being big variants are Multiple Unit Lengths and DBSOs/DVTs
As always, up to you. I just think it's an area we could be tidy on, yet still have nice Big Four representation
That is true
It's something to be considered, at least
But can't go much further than that without sprites :p
Again i'd have to look up comparative stats (as I thought a Castle and a Black Five could be the same engine but, the tractive effort is rather different) but perhaps a 2-6-0 Crab/2-6-0 N Class pairing. Yes, this variant idea has given me much thought 😄
Once I've got the first version with basic variants in, we can see if we want to go further with making more things variants
Weren't there some SR Express Tank locomotives at one point?
The Ls, or was it the K? The River Class either way
The ones that swayed, badly, and fell over
The SECR K class was a type of 2-6-4 tank locomotive designed in 1914 by Richard Maunsell for express passenger duties on the South Eastern and Chatham Railway (SECR), which operated between London and south-east England. The Southern Railway (SR) K1 class was a three-cylinder variant of the K class, designed in 1925 to suit a narrower loading g...
It was more the track than the loco though, but eh, they got binned to save face
Didn't they get converted into tender engines, or am I dreaming that?
i'm against this as well
wheel arrangements should be kept seperate
Yes, 2-6-0 U and U1 Class Moguls
Well, fair enough. There was mechanically not much between them, just Stanier could overcome years of resistance to the Pacific type from the GWR after his switch to the LMS, and so expanded the King into a Pacific, making the Princess, essentially. It's not like the difference between a 4-6-2 and a 4-8-0 or somesuch (and even then Thompson managed to convert 2-8-2s into 4-6-2s)
A similar case would be those 2-8-0Ts the GWR converted into 2-8-2Ts by welding an extra frame on them. Mechanically identical, just, an extra frame with a trailing pony truck and bigger coal bunkers.
Far more difference between an A3 and a Princess, despite sharing a wheel arrangement, than between a King and a Princess despite them differing in it. But, as you wish, as I said was just a musing on how we could keep the build lists tidy and still have variety and representation of all constituent big four companies.
thing is, the variants system was built for loco's to have different paint schemes/liveries
well, no
the variants system was built to have variants
it's just I mainly intend to use it for paint schemes and liveries
isn't that what andy uses it for as well?
yeah but it's not like that's the sole use for it
it's a feature, people can use it however they want
either way i dont think putting the King and Princess together is a good idea
yeah, that I agree with
This is why I did ask in the main chat what the variant system could do, and the essential answer was "its whatever you want it to do"
Now, the thing is, apparently we're having the LMS and LNER Garratts as variants?
(of a single loco)
Here
Now, the LMS Garratts were a class of 2-6-0+0-6-2s with 4 outside cylinders, making 45,620 lbf of tractive effort. The LNER Garratt was a single 2-8-0+0-8-2, with 3 cylinders, making 72,940 lbf. Very different beasties
dont you mean 6 cylinders for the LNER garratt?
3 at either end yes
Sorry should have specified, the LMS ones being two cylinder at either end
mixed up the way I was defining them
Garratts be complicated
Just as a thing, I noticed this
I believe the basis Pikka had for the 0-4-0ST Industrial was a Peckett
The Peckett W4 class is a class of 0-4-0 ST steam locomotives built by Peckett and Sons at the Atlas Works factory in Bristol, England from 1885 to 1906. 140 Peckett W4 locomotives were built in total, and they were part of a family of six W-class locomotive engines (W2 through W7), which featured cylinders 14 inches (360 mm) in diameter. The W4...
electric loco stuff https://www.rmweb.co.uk/topic/149513-class-88-the-original/
Evening, After doing a bit of research on the web I came across this list of unbuilt British rail locomotives and on the list was a class 88 which was basically an electric version of a class 58. I tried to do some more research into it but I couldn’t find anything. So does anyone have any more i...
HST mail car Finished
Virgin Mail time
That’s how i travel

Uhhh, the other garratt sprite (the one with a regular bunker) is still the LMS garratt.
The LNER garratt was a 2-8-0 + 0-8-2, not a 2-6-0 + 0-6-2 like the LMS ones anyways
Yes there seems to have been some confusion there
Which then confused me as, I thought variants were more...variable...than they are
Oh indeed, I was meaning within this set
I thought we were going with "similar performance means a bodyswap" (alas, the LNER and LMS Garratts were very different anyway but eh) but, apparently we're sticking rigidly to wheel arrangements.
Well yes, you brought in that and, cleared up the issue 🙂 that was after the mix up with the Garratts though. I know where we stand now though
and, given the tractive effort differences, an LNER Garratt might actually be worthwhile
Note
Got a new project idea
the Hypothetical C3 atlantic
to serve as an alternate to the shire 4-4-0
aaaand it's finished
woah was this an actual proposal? if so it seems really cool
there was a concept for a 4-4-2 when the shire class was being developed
then the LNER finance team pointed out that a 4-4-0 would be more economical
unrelated, but could we maybe see the Jones Goods as an earlier (1894) heavy freight engine?
this?
yeah
i dont see why not
won't be able to do it for a while as i have work tomorrow (and i will be dead tired afterwards) and on monday i'm taking my mum to her acting club
yeahh no rush lol, just thought it'd be interesting/unique addition
nice, though I'd also like for some of the listed suggestions in the document to be made
currently got the K3 in the works
Looking good 🙂
LNER K3 Finished
i have to say, the K3 IRL has to be one of the most ungainly looking engines ever made
Not one of Gresleys prettiest no
personal headcanon for the Highlander (P2)
i like to imagine that this one:
instead of being Cock o the North
is earl marischal in as built condition, without the additional smoke deflectors
I figured that was the case too
seriously this just looks horrible
i honestly prefer what Thompson did to them over this
but where is ukrs3 in nml
Isn't that just regular ukrs3 tho
pruple doesn't nml
oh
Is this dead or not?
It is not dead, I'm just dealing with personal issues (again) but I do still intend to finish this
Ok, that's fine. I was just puzzled as to why no-one had posted anything in two weeks. Not just Fairyfloss, not just Will, no-one...
I was just being quiet and waiting patiently
I could draw more but, i do have other projects, and I don't want Fairy to feel obliged to code stuff just because its been drawn etc. I work at their pace, not they at mine etc
projects can often go quiet for months, even years, without being dead))
ditto, i just get random ideas that i can toss together every now and then
Personally i feel we have enough locos and stock for an initial release
4-6-2 Coronation with smoke deflectors
always annoyed me how the non streamlined coronation lacked smoke deflectors
the defectors have been detected
BRSet went dead like 6 times in 15 years, with one partial release and then one full release after a decade... it's just the nature of small projects, if the developers are busy then they have to prioritise other things. You'll tend to find progress comes in bursts
Has anybody got any idea how i can make a Duke of Gloucester that looks different to the britannia, since they are both BR standards?
biggest difference i could make is a new tender
(duke of gloucester)
britannia
Funnel
wouldn't be a big enough difference in OpenTTD
i have one other idea besides a new tender
(original britannia top, duke tender bottom)
a complete boiler swap for the merchant navy's boiler
if i keep that dotted line of grey pixels i think i could pull it off
yeah that looks good
And the Duke is finished
My advice: Don't sweat it
Even zoomed in on a static screen here the difference is minimal between your two drawings. Once shrunk down with all the other TTD stuff around it you won't be able to tell that small a difference, don't waste energy on it
. . . i already finished it
right here
Yeah I referred to it xD I more mean in general, don't worry about that kind of distinction between units, it's too minor to matter
it might be minor, but it helps to tell the difference
Articulated Brake coach
does antbody know what the "Hitachi A train" actually is?
I think i worked it out
yeah?
i figured it was obviously a hitachi of some sort
but the A train as its depicted doesn't exist on UK rails
The British Rail Class 395 Javelin is a dual-voltage electric multiple-unit (EMU) passenger train built by Hitachi Rail as part of the Hitachi A-train AT300 family for high-speed commuter services on High Speed 1 and elsewhere on the South Eastern franchise. The whole fleet is operated by Southeastern.
The Class 395 can operate at a maximum spee...
i thought it might be that, but it can't
all the hitachi trains in the UK have the pantograph on the end units
meanwhile the one in UKRS2 has the pantograph in the middle of a not end unit
Are the stats otherwise correct?
oh IDK about any of the stats
and besides
there's more than 1 class of hitachi running around the UK now
Oh
Ages ago
I wrote down what all the ukrs2 trains were
I’ll look at that
The British Rail Class 800 – branded by Great Western Railway (GWR) as Intercity Express Train (IET), and London North Eastern Railway (LNER) as Azuma – is a type of bi-mode multiple unit train built by Hitachi Rail for GWR and LNER. The type uses electric motors powered from overhead electric wires for traction, but also has diesel generators ...
I said it was this
nope, that has the pantograph on the lead units too
its probably based on them, but a pre-concept
The UKRS2 "Hitachi A-Train" is based on the Hitachi AT-300, which is the basis for both the Class 395 and Class 80X series
The concept art for the IEP (which became the 800, 801, 802) showed the pantographs on the end cars
Presumably Pikka chose to draw it differently because UKRS is meant to be a representative set, not a direct real-world replacement - other units are the same, with differences to reality
I always read representative as being representative of trains overall in the UK
Not as being representative of the idea of uk trains
I think the simplest answer is that he probably just did it because that's how he'd drawn the rest of the set - the Pendolino, Electrostar, 321, 325 are all drawn like that. He may not have even thought about that detail, especially if it was drawn before the real trains appeared and he only had concept art to work from
When you're drawing a bunch of stuff eventually you're gonna take some shortcuts and copy + paste something without thinking about whether you could be accidentally copying an incorrect detail over
Honestly I don't think he designed the set with that level of precision in mind - the Sprinter, for example, has a Class 150-style commuter door, even though most sprinter classes had intercity-style doors, but the Sprinter in the set doesn't have the doors behind the cabs
The trains are meant to be similar to the real world units, but he deliberately seems to have avoided doing a precise like-for-like approach
Like for like is near impossible at this scale anyway
To be fair, we refer to them as 80x Class. You may want to check all the related classes:
800, 801, 802, 803, 805, 807, 810
the class 395 is also classed as an A train
and they all have pantographs on the lead units
as a question, does anybody know where the 604 came from?
i've found plenty of proof for the 5at's design but nothing for the 604
I'm not able to find a thing either. Perhaps a Pikka extrapolation?
i wouldn't be surprised if it was a work of fiction for the grf
i ask because i doubt such an engine IRL would use the coronation as a basis, as the 604 in the grf does
and im tempted to make my own version of it using the britannia or the duke as a base instead
it would probably still be the 604
simply because i hate its sprite, its so lazy, just a badly recoloured coronation
@snow carbon the non black streaks are still using the wrong tender on the github
with the water tank at the front rather than at the back
here's the fixed versions
I have once again returned to ask if this is released
no it has not
Aw damn
RL matters are interfering with fairy's ability to work on the GRF
we artist have been had at work expanding the stock lists though
. . . real life
it'll come out when it comes out
as for the 604 project
im planning two versions
version 1, built off the duke is to replace the unstreamlined version
version 2 will be built off the streak to replace the streamlined version
and is more of a passion project of my vision for a modern A4 intended to take the world speed record for steam traction
and yes ideally i would have version 2 be set to a max speed of 130 mph
Do we have a documentation file of this? So that people don't have to go trawling through this chat if someone wants to redo this a decade down the line from now?
github?
Like, a word document that people not familiar with github can read?
no i don't think so
If someone wants to re-do the set then they'd have enough technical knowledge to be able to work Github, surely?
also why would somebody want to redo the set again?
I dunno. Technology might have moved on to the point it would be beneficial in something like a decade... And given how old OpenTTD is, I doubt it would fall completely out of interest in that time...
fair enough
but i doubt people would need much more than the art from in here
and there are filters in the search bar for finding only images
To be fair there’s no guarantee Discord will still exist at that point - these kinds of gaming community apps come and go. But the GitHub will be most likely to be useful
i don't know of anything that can replace discord any time soon
^^
tbh the only thing i can think of that can replace discord, is discord itself
Aye
dunno about discord but irc will surely still exist 🤣
We all thought nothing would replace Teamspeak, or MSN Messenger, or MySpace, or AOL. Things change fast in the tech world
yet irc still exists
What even is irc? What does it stand for?
Internet relay chat
True but some constants have appeared, like google, i think the internet is far more stable than it used to be now that people kinda know what it is
anyways, progress on version 1 of the new 604:
decided to copy the old ones coloured smoke deflectors
a version with black smoke deflectors will be provided for use of course
I like it. Distinctive yet familiar
that was my intention
i figure such an engine would most likely draw from the Duke of Gloucester as it's one of the most advanced steam locomotives on the uk network constantly seeing modifications to improve efficiency.
making it the ideal baseboard for a future pacific
i put a set of bulleid firth brown wheels on as i feel those would be another thing such an engine would have
No/Greatly reduced hammer action on the tracks and doesn't have tire issues
I envision such an engine would use the dukes caprotti valve gear to REALLY make full use of the steam
All yes. Excellent work
OK finished the unstreamlined version.
Question about the streamlined one,
Should I use the valanced streak or the unvalanced streak for it?
Hmmm. I think unvalanced as I don't believe the valances had a great effect on speed but they did affect maintenance which would be a more pressing concern
unvalanced it is
here's what i have so far
I've copied the yellow bearing covers from the duke and britannia
put bulleid firth brown wheels on again and added the GT3 style cab
i'll be posting 2 .zip files of the completed 604s
1 zip for the unstreamlined, 1 zip for the streamlined
but thats later
i gotta go to work
Very nice 🙂
and here are the .zips
Question, what is the 4-4-0 edwardian's IRL prototype?
I think the wiki had it as the Midland Railway 1000
Anybody know how long it is compared to City of Truro?
I will research
Apparently length of MR 1000 is 57ft 9inch
I can't find any info on the overall dimensions of City of Truro but I can find the wheelbase (which as I am sure you know on steam engines is from where the wheels touch the rails). That's 8ft 6 inch on CoT
So you can extrapolate the overall length from that and photos, roughly
i suppose the real question is whether the city is more 0-6-0 size or 4-4-0 size
Irritatingly I can't find the wheelbase for the Midland 1000
But I believe the City is slightly smaller
Given it has smaller driving wheels
but is it 4 pixels smaller?
Unlikely
I'll try and find photos with some sort of scale
Now, using the photo you have above of the 1000 class from a similar angle, and knowing the size of the driving wheels of each, you should be able to scale the images, if roughly
wait hold up, could the 4-4-0 edwardian be the Midland Railway 483 Class?
now that i look at the sprite, no
City of Truro - 6 ft 8+1⁄2 in
Midland 1000 - 7ft
the edwardian clearly has the outside cylinders
The Edwardian is the 1000, as pikka explicitly stated this back when ukrs2 was first created
(Originally prj1000, project 1000, from that class)
i suppose the real question is how to turn the edwardian into a more city-like engine
The leading wheels on the two are
City of Truro - 3ft 2 in
Midland 1000 - 3 ft 6+1⁄2 in
thats the problem, there aren't many outside frame locos in UKRS2
And the more exposed cab and gwr dome
i've done the GWR dome
Also is there any way to taper the boiler at ttd scale or no?
Tender could be slightly lower too perhaps.
And the big distinctive name plate. Perhaps borrow parts from the spinner?
Nice
Could we have a variety of brake vans of the same/similar weight, say LMS, NE, GWR toads etc, and have them randomise when built? Or is that a lot of drawing and coding for not much gain ?
already done them
we have a GWR toad, two six wheel brake vans and the 15 ton
as for randomising, i doubt that's in fairy's plans since we have variants now
Nice, alrighty then 🙂
i'm thinking of trying to make the Queen Mary brake vans
The long LSWR/SR ones? I don't recall what they were used for historically. Fish traffic?
Maybe a celestory coach lower with a brake van upper? Although the diagonals would be harder to blend
LSWR?
all the records i can find state they were built by the SR only
i might try and make this LMS one too
generally, express goods since they were built on passenger coach chassis and fitted with passenger bogies
(a proper queen mary)
Possibly. I'm not overly up on pregrouping down south
tbh neither am i, and i grew up smack dab in the middle of it!
the queen marys were built in 1936 BTW
Ah okee, I am probably mixing them up with something else I read about
if you know more about big brake vans do share
im always looking for more ideas
I'll dig around see what I can find
cool
im aware of a GCR bogie brake van, but that can be mistaken as a passenger wagon to easily
I'm thinking of a flatbed instead of a clerestory tbh
update to the 15 ton, its now the size of the goods van and the 5 plank
Queen Mary brake van finished
(close up)
its built to the same length as the clerestory coaches BTW
Looking good, (both)
@nova cape you can find details of the UKRS2 NML port in here
progress update on the B17
opinion needed
shorter vesion (same size as 4-4-0 shire)
or larger version (same size as 4-6-0 jubilee)
I've decided to make both, the shorter version I can refit into the b12
Excellent.
making that was hard
like P2 highlander levels of hard
but it was worth it
and as a result of the stream lined variants progress
we now have LNER 8 wheel high-side tenders with no corridor connection
progress goes well on the streamlining
and it is finished
Nice. Loving the options we have now, all in that UKRS2 style 🙂
And we're far from done.
I think I might have cracked the GWR 4-6-0 problem, meaning the hall won't be the only one.
We could soon have the castle and the King classes join
im thinking of elevating the old hall (see picture) to be the castle
and im making a new hall
though this does bring up a question
was there a length difference between the GWR 4-6-0's?
as in were the castles longer than the halls?
and were the kings longer than the castles?
i'm not gonna bother with the stars and granges as they would just be over-doing it
wiki says there's about a ~2ft difference between the hall and castle
3ft between king and castle
so would the length difference shown in my latest picture be suitable for the difference between a hall and a castle?
i'll have to figure something out for the kings besides a different boiler and a coloured bearing on the front wheel of the pony truck
tbh I'm not sure? the difference in the two might be too big
it looks about the same as the difference between the two b17 sprites you did
thats because it is
diff between the D49 and the jubilee is 6ft
you could have the longer spring be the king and the shorter be the castle/hall
D49?
shire
do you by any chance know the difference in length between a king and an LNER A3?
wiki says the A3 is 70ft 5 inch, so a bit over 2ft longer than the king
hmmm
question, are these lengths of the locomotive only or loco and tender?
should be including tender
ah i need loco only
ohhh ic
can't seem to find any lengths without the tender
for what its worth, the hall, castle, king all list the same tender weight on wikipedia, so most likely they share the same?
thats useful to know!
i found this for the king
i'm thinking i'll make the king and the castle both size 6 large and the hall size 6 small
there should be enough design differences between the castle and the king that i can make them suitably unique
or not as it turns out, why did they have to make these engines so bloody similar?!
it seems like the front pilot truck wheels having outside frames is the only noticable difference
ok THIS is a GODSEND
https://www.devboats.co.uk/gwdrawings/460identification.php
ALL the GWR 4-6-0's in the same scale!
yeah castle and king are visually identical nearly
i was going to go a similar route
similar route?
making them the same sprite and similar sizes for the others
oh, i was gonna do my hardest to make them have differences
finally, found a drawing of the a1/a3
and thanks to a length calculator
i know know the A1/A3 is 43 feet 11 inches long from front buffer to rear of the footplate
and that the king is 43 feet long from front buffer to rear of the footplate (i was not expecting the results to be so similar)
as a result i think i can get away with making the king size 7
If you make them the same size, you can still hint at different sizes with some shading - it can be surprisingly effective
yeah they are surprisingly big
I'm not good at using shading for such things so the king will be size 7. I've got it more or less figured out anyways.
in other news i think i have a finalised Hall design i'm happy with
i put the driving wheels from the king arthur on
Looking good.
only issue is the tender
On the upside, once you do get the tender right, that's a good template for almost all GWR tenders
i have one but the way the GRF is made i don't know if it can be used
ideally i'd use the tender i made for the old hall (now castle)
this one
but the GRF doesn't allow tenders of size 4 (small) with engines of size 6 (small)
all the engines with that size tender are size 6 (large)
i mean it looks good
so i might ask @snow carbon if the code could be changed to allow it
that way i could use the tender with the king as well
that doesn't sound that complicated of a change
would made things easier all around too
i might take a look myself
I think ideally the code should be changed. I can see why it was kept to certain templates, for simplicity in coding many engines, but if there are identical tenders being used on different locos of different lengths, the tenders should stay the same
i originally wanted to give the 2-8-2 mikado the tender from the 2-6-2 Arrow
as the IRL P1s were fitted with 6 wheel tenders, not 8 wheel ones
Rather than fudging the tenders to fit the template
i had to kitbash a tender out of the merchant navy and the coronation
I'm having a look and I see 0 reason why this isn't possible already
that's why i @ed fairy
what lengths are these tenders
top is the one from the arrow, which is size 4 (small)
bottom is the the same size as all the pacific tenders, which is size 4 (large)
(a copy of the size chart if it helps)
yes thank
np
HOLD UP
THEY MADE 8 WHEEL ONES?!
correction, they only made 1
and it never ran behind a king!?
well that's just wrong
that's quite funny to see
if we can't get fairy to allow smaller tenders for the king i might make it
small tenders with small loco's should be possible
only reason it's not done so far is because nothing in UKRS2 has it
What about smaller tenders with big locos?
E.g. mating a size six (small) tender to a size 7 loco?
Also possible, there's nothing holding that back from working
Excellent, once I'm back on my PC I shall make the needed updates to the mikado, finish the hall and castle and get started on the king.
'ery noice
i require an opinion
A or B for wheel arrangement?
(A having a more complete boiler has no meaning btw)
king side view for comparison
Honestly I don't think anyone is gonna notice the difference. I'd go for the first one for a 4-6-0 just because it's on the higher end of the "number of wheels" scale, so the "busier" running gear fits better IMO
I'd say B personally
A or B?
I don't see any A/B labels 😂 I assume A is top/first? So A
I say A also
A it is then
Okay, question.
Should Diesel Locomotives and such be named more akin to UKRS2 style (EE Type 3) or use their TOPS Classes (Class 37)
I prefer TOPS but why not just make it a param?
I can make it a param later, just want to decide which to make first/make the default
I think TOPS as default makes more sense
It seems to be what most people are familiar with, what is used in other games and what is used in other grfs
this
i personally would prefer keeping the UKRS2 style of naming for diesels, though i can agree having the TOPS clasification would make the diesels easier to sort.
If anyone is willing to help out with filling in the big stat sheet I need to quickly put out code, do give me a poke so I can give the link and instructions
i'd be willing to help with this
Okay, I think the program I intend to use to output the code for locomotives is Good to Go, all that's left is:
- Filling out the datasheet
- Running the program on the Data
- Seeing where things break
And after that, gonna do the same thing but for the carriages/wagons, but once I've got this working that should be much easier
@tawny oar would you be able to take a look at the datasheet if I send it to you and mark which vehicles I've listed haven't yet been drawn (basically if you didn't make it, consider it not drawn) and which things you've drawn aren't included in the list
minor issue, i've forgotten most of what ive made
and i'll be away from my main computer for a couple days
^(this is so i can continue working on it on the other computer)
Right, back on my main computer
why not send me the data-sheet anyways, i can always dig through the discord channel to find whats been made
minor update to the Castle
I hereby proclaim the 4-6-0 King, Finished!
and with that i consider the GWR steam fleet properly represented in UKRS2, and isometric transport management games in general
Superlative work
Here's a question, much like how certain kinds of rolling stock reduce the decay rate of goods and outright reduce running costs, is it possible to make a modifier that speeds up cargo loading and unloading
my idea is for a TPO wagon, it can only carry half as much mail as the express mail carriage, but it DRASTICALLY speeds up loading and unloading of mail
(one of these)
Ideally, the tpo would only be able to carry Mail and its effect would only apply to mail
Why would dedicated mail carriages be needed? Wouldn't the ones we already have be suitable?
^These ones
I said that since I was unsure whether quicker loading would be able to change between different cargoes but it might be possible
tbh i only want this to work for mail
since i doubt a proper TPO (loading and unloading mail without stopping the train) would be possible
just so i get notifs on this
You can do that without replying (just for future reference) - hit the notification icon and then you can Follow and enable/disable notifications
Ohhh
either way, be welcome in our workshop
any updates?
ok since there's been no updates from fairy, i have one
i'm adapting the jubilee into a standard class 5
and done
Nice!
thank you
i stumbled upon this while looking through a model railway discord, i never knew the GWR made these
shouldn't be too hard to make, prairie body on suburban 1 chassi
well that helps, their both the same size
and done
GWR Suburban:
introduction date - 1905
Tractive effort - 20,530 lbf
Excellent work there. Yes apparently they didn't last too long. Replaced with Prairies
it'll make a good companion to the suburban
does anybody know how different the V4 is to the V2?
2 more vs
not what i meant
generally smaller and lighter, designed for less heavily-built lines
boiler diameter is similar to the LNER K2 or B1 (foot smaller than V2)
not performance wise
appearence wise
like were the V4's shorter from front to back than the V2
and could i get away with using the klondyke's boiler?
C2 is a bit small, C1 could work I think? diameters look close enough
V4 is definitely smaller lengthwise, even visually it looks kinda tiny in comparison to the V2
how does this look?
its the same length as the klondyke and the shire
and is using the shire's boiler, cab and tender
Excellent work there 🙂
Hi
as am i
however Fairy's jobe is of the soul sucking variety
meaning fairy has no energy to work on the GRF
Work is dead. Uni is now.
Trying to see if I can pull through and actually get a first release out.
actually here's just the rough in-development build I'm working on. Locomotives only. Bit clustered and rough. Stuff's missing, getting everything setup still.
I haven't touched anything about this in a while, so poke me about missing/incorrect stuff
why not have cc and rcc as refits rather than varients?
Because I find variants more convenient
are you not doing many real life liveries?
I auto-generate the majority of my code
Still tweaking my setup but ideally it'd mean I'd need to do minimal manual adjustments and it'd just be a matter of getting the sprites and adjust a single number and a single line of text
fair
im doing real life liveries and 2cc too
but im keeping all the 2cc stuff as refits
along with anything fictional
i can see the appeal but it also looks cluttered imo to have it all as vars
I thought there was a way to hide parent vehicles but I can't find it atm
you can hide by ctrl clicking on a vehicle
and if you ctrl click on the last one you built it hides everything below it
oh
I think I had it working at some point
so these two would be hidden
I tried, that just makes the vehicle unavailable entirely
damn
Ah, I see
So I can hide the top-level one
but not the one below it
So in this case, I'd be able to hide the Red-line'd one, and probably make the blue ones the RL Livery
the locos don't change appearance over time like in the original UKRS2, right?
That looks to be the case
excellent
gave all Steam Loco's an Applel Green, Black, GWR/BR Green and LMS Red Livery, based on the colours in the standard UKRS set. The black needs some adjusting, I think.
this shade of black looks better, I think
also tender-less vehicles (tank engines, diesels/electrics) face a random direction when bought, and keep their heading when the train reverses, so it looks like thy just ran around the train. I think Iron Horse does that too, which is what inspired me to do it for this
This shade of black also seems to have shrunk the file size! 😂
mmm compression
The idea of a 9F in LMS Crimson Lake is...curious 😄
Can i make them face another direction?
Yes, by control-clicking
also pushed my latest stuff to the github for interested parties
https://github.com/FranticFairy/FairyUKSet
Do the pullmans and the Brighton belle have their liveries?
I haven't given anything special treatment yet
and wagons don't have liveries at all yet
👍
I'm messing about with colours more. I've got these single-colour, easy-to-apply liveries, based mostly on existing colour schemes for UKRS2 stuff (idk where I got Caledonian Blue from I think it's default light blue)
What do people think I should do with these? Blanket add them to everything? Only add specific colour schemes to specific things (like, only tank engines get Industrial Yellow, for example)? Something else?
Flat CC1 then, basically
Caley blue seems to vary a lot
I am no expert on the Caledonian to know I'm afraid
Also, Southern Green came in several variations. Malachite, Olive etc, so in some cases the LNER Green or CC2 Green would work too
Yea, hence why I think it's valid to apply like, the same colour options even to companies that wouldn't normally have the specific loco, perhaps with more generalized names. That way, locos can be stand-in for other locos by recolouring them, and liveries can represent other liveries
Excellent idea 🙂
LMS Crimson Lake for example can stand in for Metropolitan, Midland, Furness, North Stafford etc liveries
I didn't mean to sound as if I was mocking with my 9F comment either, far from, the concept of a lot of those engines in LMS Crimson Lake just appealed to me, as someone into Alternative History 🙂
Ooh, and the CC1 blue is quite like that BR Experimental Express Passenger Blue also. I always quite liked that
Always thought BR should have gone with it, as it was different to any Big Four livery, so there could be no accusations of favouritsm
Yea, so I'm thinking the maximum liveries, not counting specific ones, would be:
- Standard 2CC
- Reversed 2CC (CC1 becomes CC2, CC2 becomes CC1)
- Purely CC1
- Purely CC2
- Grey
- Black
- Industrial Yellow
- LNER Green
- LMS Red
- GWR Green
- SR Green
- (Caledonian Light Blue?)
- BR Green
- BR/Caledonian Blue
- Silver
it's a lovely colour
Which. yes, is a lot, but I personally don't think it's that cluttered, since you can collapse variants
i'm trying to find hornby A4's in that colour rather than BR green or LNER blue
I reckon that list works for all possibilities
Also
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dT0OxFr02NJ-Ng9_QGSHWRsLpo7cADmfbniMlUGYWPE/edit?usp=sharing
COLOURS
Colour Names,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
CC1,64ACE0,4898D8,3878BC,285CA4,1C448C,14347C,0C2468,081858
CC2,80A82C,68941C,548414,40700C,306004,205004,104000,083400
LNER Apple Green,90E05C,7CC84C,6CB040,5C9C34,548414,40700C,306004,205004
LMS Crimson Lake,FC3434,FC0000,E00000,C40000,A0000...
New Sheet that I'm using for stuff
Hornby did do em but I think it was a limited run
first tab also contains my Palette Lists for these colours
And of course that list of colours covers pretty much all permutations of pre-grouping as well
(Industrial yellow works for something like LBSCR)
no they did more,
here's mallard
Ah, mind you Hornby have been somewhat weird with how many they make of different models of late.
and golden eagle
Do we have pallette options/space left for a brown?
Something like the afforementioned LBSCR, or NBR/GNoSR
As many as one could possibly want
Palettes are made up out of 8 different shades. And since I'm doing non-CC liveries in 32bpp, they're not restricted to the OpenTTD Palette
Ah excellent. I would suggest a brown then, and if we could possibly make the LMS Red a little more Crimson. (that was always limited by the 8bpp palette)
These two are based on the Brown and Yellow-ish colour the Clerestory Coach gets
Let me put a little something together
You're doing sterling work btw 🙂
Here's the Shire, but with the entire standard CC1 palette put there for reference
so you can try out colour combinations by using, for example, paint.net's Global Bucket. If you set it to 0% tolerance, you can slowly replace the palette and watch the train change. Not every colour is used by the Shire, but I think it's a great reference locomotive.
Here it is with transparency if wanted
If you have a palette you think is nice, just send me either the image or the 8 colours you used (from left to right) along with a proposed name
I'll give it a go
I can implement a new livery in... 10 minutes? Possibly less? Assuming I'm awake and not preoccupied, of course
it's just a matter of generating the sprites, adding a line of code to my code-writing program, running it, and updating two files
A lot of the repetitive stuff is automated, it's only the specifics that will need to be manually worked on
Excellent. I admire programming things to work smart, rather than hard
Would different colours not work better as refits rather than variants? Or, whatever the cargo box button in the vehicle window represents.
I prefer variants
It would result in less .pnml files, sure, and be less cluttered in the purchase menu, but it has its own wonkiness that needs to be taken into account, and is less convenient for seeing what's available
Maybe once everything's said and done I'll make a separate release that uses livery refits instead of variants but that's for future me to consider. Currently I'm sticking to variants
question
what happens if one uses the grf on a version of TTD which doesan't have variants?
i even sent the fixed ones 😢
I think it errors but idk
I thought I fixed it. Fixed it for sure now
Is there anyone who'd be able to bulk-apply the OpenTTD Palette to... a LOT of images? I know there's some way to do it using Photoshop and Macros, but I don't have Photoshop. It'd be a huge help to me
I know how to do it manually by gimp but I don't want to do that for... roughly 300 images. Possibly more in the future.
I do have Photoshop. If you need it doing, i'd have to figure out how (i've used macros before but not to assign a palette) but I would be willing
I can send you a guide andy sent me a while back and see if you can get it to work?
Sure thing 🙂
Also, I quickly did a "Burnt Umber" test
and a revised LMS Crimson Lake
Red, Crimson & Umber
chefs kiss
oh no you've caught variants
Variants >>> Livery Refits
Excellent
So, in Caley Blue, its No.123, in GWR Green it can be a Dean Single, in Crimson Lake its a Johnson Spinner, in Apple Green its a Stirling Single
(the Silver looks like Photographic Grey too so thats nice)
Gonna need to go through the list of trains and make some adjustments because for some of them CC1 and CC overlap and CC2 and Reversed CC overlap
CC is essentially the default sprite
RCC swaps CC1 and CC2
CC1 replaces CC2 with CC1 so it's all CC1
CC2 is the CC2 equivalent
so on locomotives that have two colours, they're all different. On locomotives with only one Company Colour, CC and CC1 do the same, and RCC and CC2 do the same
Hey guys
It looks like you’re drawing a sprite for each vehicle
But why not have one sprite and the code recolour it?
You can't recolour it to any colour
manifique chefs kiss
if i could suggest an alteration
i changed the darkest to be more brown rather than black
Absolutely fine 🙂
the old darkest brown looks a bit wrong on engines like the pacific
an NBR Pacific does get my Alternate History brain clicking 😄
and yes i had to make the pacific in burnt umber 😄
i was thinking LBSCR myself
Either is tantalising
(1915 Gresley concept for a 4-Cylinder Compound Pacific, based on a stretched Atlantic basically. After the test 4-Cylinder Compound Atlantic proved dissapointing, he redesigned it to be a simple expansion 3-Cylinder with his own valve gear, and well the rest is history)
are there any other railways that used the burnt umber livery?
because both the NBR and LBSCR didn't have attractive coach liveries
I don't know how to code this but I do know how to code a program to bulk recolour sprites so it's MUCH easier for me to do it that way.
Should I standardize livery names (Burnt Umber, Crimson, Green) or company-named colours (BR Green, GWR Green, LMS Crimson)
and in case of the former, how should I differentiate name-wise between BR Green and GWR Green
i say go for the company names
Company names would be simpler
If you wanted to go for pure colour names, I believe GWR green was Bronze Green
And BR green was Brunswick Green
Apple Green
Black
Express Blue
Brunswick Green
Sky Blue
Crimson Lake
Bronze Green
Grey
Red
Silver
Olive
Burnt Umber
My main concern with company names is that it's also quite specific, whereas color names are a bit more vague, but it's a minor thing
Yes, I did try and think of a suitable list for company names, without it being too complex
For example "Apple Green" applies to the NER, GNR and LNER but "GNR/NER/LNER Apple Green" is rather wordy
That could work. I think a combination might work. So, simple colour names with a bit of fake text saying "Suitable for: BR Green" or "Suitable for: LBSCR/NBR Burnt Umber"
Keeps the name short and uncluttered whilst adding some info on what they're supposed to be
exactly
If anyone is wanting to do art things, there's a few locomotives I'd love to include if I have art for them:
- LSWR 0298 (unrebuilt and rebuilt)
Metropolitan Railway E (we might already have this one need to check the sprites)GCR Class 8HNER Class XLNER L2/Metropolitan K- USATC S100
- LNER M2/Metropolitan G
- Metropolitan Railways 'Metro-Vick' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_Railway_electric_locomotives)
- BR 10100
- Blue Pullman (apparently hard to get looking right in finescale)
Additionally, if anyone is interested in producing some non-british stuff in finescale size (for a personal set that I might release to the public if it contains stuff that won't go in the main set), I'm interested in:
- A diesel locomotive like the DB/BR V188
- An electric locomotive like the JNR EH10
did some side-view kitbashing of random things in case anyone wants to try and make them into proper full sprites
I like the Class 13, and the one underneath it, it's familiar. Is it that gas turbine one?
or maybe the Metro-Vick electric? At this scale, similar shape
(and also made by the same company, so, makes sense)
Oh, no, the Class 13 is the only real one
and I can't manage anything other than the side-views, unfortunately
Well, the one below it would work for 18000 or 18100
The one below it is actually two Class 20's stuck together with the cab in the middle
Ah, like a Super-Clayton
(but one that actually works)
I thought it looked like this 😄
Yes, its got a slightly slopey front and thats tricky
we have the E class
it's the metropolitan class
this one
I'm looking for the uh, the 'opposite' one
one's a 0-4-4 and the other a 4-4-0 i don't remember which is which
the 4-4-0 is the A class
and i think i made that a while ago
yeah here it is
and here's the open cab variant
more shenanigans. An attempt at the Metro-Vick electric, and some cursed Class 44 A and B units (I honestly kinda like the design)
have you considered a class 55 A and B unit?
I do wonder why we never went down the A and B Unit route. I mean we did have multiple working (Blue Star etc)
A Deltic A and B Unit though, 6000hp?
There is that
and removing turntables was likely high on the list of things the modernisation plan involved
also having A and B units meant more upkeep
and not every train needed a B unit meaning there would be B units sitting around, wasting money
Whereas every diesel being double ended meant even when not in multiple working, they could be put to use elsewhere
exactly
for once, something the 1955 plan got right?
looks at Type 1s yup
precisely
it was so bad BR had to buy back steam locomotives to fill in for the diesels while better ones were made
then one has to wonder if it was worth it with the whole oil crisis in the 70's
imagine if BR's original plan of keeping steam into the 90's was in effect when that happened
Something i've found interesting in the alternate history stuff i've looked into, regarding what the Big Fours plans were had nationalisation not happened, was that whilst the LMS plans were allowed to continue (hence the twins) and the GWRs slightly odd experiments into gas turbines were, the LNERs were not, because they wanted to do the unspeakable: import American designs
i saw one where the LNER got what we call the class 37 and 55
though that same timeline showed the GWR going for the diesel hydraulics
somehow still having what we know as the class 52
Myself when i've pondered it, I've found it more likely that the GWR would have gone gas turbine and then diesel electric, the Southern would have continued to go electro-diesel, as it just made sense given their infrastructure, the LMS would likely be the highest user of diesels, with the LNER seeking to electrify as soon as was feasible
yeah that makes sense
in that same timeline i saw the LNER electrified the ECML down to either peterborough or london itself from where the woodhead line connected to it
1500v DC ECML. It'd look very Dutch
basically like this