#Ragins Train Sets
1 messages · Page 10 of 1
yeah, that's exactly what I want
you're strange >:/
You find him old?
Maybe try diagnosing me
||Over 99% of my internet time is on desktop, I find mobile internet not convinient to use||
tbf, I'm the same
I hate the entire mobile first movement in website design...
HUGE icons and pictures, little to no text...
And low quality articles
yeah, I hate it
Make Internet Great Again
Old
It’s probably 50-50 for me
I like being in bed watching YouTube
on an TV or laptop? (good)
Or on an cellphone (what the fuck...)
On my phone
I don’t use a laptop in bed because I’m not a psychopath
TV would just be inconvenient
How You can watch youtube on mobile...
Your yeyes and hands will hurt...
And the sound quality or, accually lack of it...
My hands are fine
My eyesight is well above 6-6
I don’t really care about sound quality when I’m not critically listening to music
When i was little i had one of those CRT TVs in my room
It was black and white and the screen was about twice the size of my phone screen
I think I’ll manage
How can you listen to such a screeching voice?
other than the gauge, yea
I got a new chair and holy fuck its so good to have some back support finally
Oooh, interesting little thing
The one in the back is evan more interesting
ACS-64
If only the Quebec City Windsor Corridor was electrified
It would have been so cool to have these on VIA Rail
We could've had our own Northeast Corridor
well....
GO Transit ALMOST bought almost brand new E60s
If thay did that thay would have to electrify at least one of thair lines
https://www.flickr.com/photos/zirocket/14908956224 why does this actually look good
My concept of an Electric GO Commuter Train, which would run at least every 15 minutes (it should run at least every 5 minutes, at subway frequency). Derived from Metrolinx's electrification/RER plan. Watercolor on cheap watercolor paper. The train is a Swiss Stadler FLIRT (Fast Light Innovative Rapid Transit) EMU.
indeed this looks good
Cause it does 😦
shame they dont deserve it
nice!
AI is getting really good eh 😄
While I'm okay with the bi-mode locomotives for the GO electrification project, I really hoped that we had gotten Stadler FLIRT or KISS EMUs
But then again, they aren't electrifying the full length of every line so bi-mode locomotives isn't bad
there are also bi-mode MUs
But I guess that thay want to use the coaches that thay currently have with new locos
Информация по электропоездам Российских железных дорог и других стран. Проект электропоезда 9710
just as a f-ing lot of strange and quirky things, this originates from russia
i wouldnt trust a .ru link personally
This is interesting
Similar to the 4DD
effectively 1.5 decks
The fart sniffer express
but these contain the most bizzare designs

Found this thing
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_State_Railways_PC_class
The PC class was a type of standard gauge passenger steam locomotive on Iraqi State Railways. In 1940 the ISR completed the Baghdad Railway between Baghdad and Tel Kotchek on the border with Syria, enabling the Taurus Express to start running between Istanbul and Baghdad. In 1941 Robert Stephenson and Hawthorns built four Pacific locomotives for...
Not too sure sure if it fits or not though
it'd fit in a middle eastern set, which I wanna do at some point
ah
Probably one of the most well know Middle Eastern locos if i'd have to wager
that's fair
I agree
Central Asia and the Middle East are very overlooked in terms of vehicle history
yeah, its why I wanna do a set focusing on it at some point :3
would turkish railways fit into this
I guess?
Tbh a middle eastern set would be everything from turkey to iran to Pakistan tbh
Only one I'd be hesitant of including would be Israel because of the political situation there
showing off my stuff for a video, and I took this for the thumbnail
I've drawn too much 😦
I need to be stopped 😦
btw, I forgot to finish the F class
so that's next update then
no gronk for now 😦
Disappointed you didn’t call it Generic Oceanian Rail Pack so the acronym could be gorp
bloody could have told me that!
also, video I did is done
Support me on Ko-fi!
https://ko-fi.com/cityconnections
Openttd links:
Website: https://www.openttd.org/
Steam: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1536610/OpenTTD/
Discord: https://discord.gg/openttd
Want the content I made?
When you boot the game, click "check online content", search "ORP" and download "ORP - Passenger Set" and "ORP - Modern L...
it's going here because I'm too lazy to ask for the content creators badge
<@&213327499357061121> Get this person a role 😄
Video is quite nice, I enjoyed the explanations of how you think about your design choices and why you did certain trains.
Maybe a future side quest for grf development will be fixing the exhaust effect offsets? They’re all lined up at the front of the train, not over the exhaust stack. 😛
Wait, you're that youtube channel? I've definitely seen some of your videos then 🙂
Have a role 😉
yeah... I need to do that
oh no, I've been identified 😦
tbh this 600 class livery goes hard, it's very "we have British rail at home"
British rail should have bought ALCOs, don't @ me
true
yeah, an EMD GT26 would go hard in BR schemes
oh fr
my fav american built loco has to be the U26C tbh
that's fair, tbh I've never been a fan of that era of GE locomotives
I prefer the sharp angles of the equivelant EMDs
Gave me Belgium vibes
ooooh, I didn't know you did one of those
typo in the docs though, it's a DL531 IRL, not DL351
Oops 🤣
tsk tsk tsk
also it's kinda interesting how in Horse, the Narrow gauge stuff tends to be Australian/Kiwi locos, and are smaller than the standard gauge stuff
when IRL, typically Australian locomotives are the same size, if not larger, than their British counter parts
Yes, reality distortion
don't speak to me or my son ever again
wait no I have the perfect photo
don't speak to me or my son ever again
the great part of being involved in history circles is that I know a lot of historians to ask questions
I made the goober mistake of asking why they didn't do a chop nose 45 class
turns out they did and it looks cool 😦
they tried giving one a Pilbara cab?
Very weird
Kinda like T class variants
yeah, although tbf, those came out of the factory like that
Some were modified later I think
I wouldn't be surprised if they were
iirc the P classes were built out of the original flat tops?
I have not 😦
but I need to
The Australian motive power dice strikes again
why not have an N class and Y class work the same train?
Normally the few Y classes just run around southern cross all day shunting
I think the last time one went out was to rescue an EMU
probably
They don’t need the power
tbf, they're just not powerful enough for anything but shunting
and the branch line work they were originally meant for is all but gone
Only 5 coaches per loco hauled trains usually, so just an N up front
I know, it's just a funny combo
Another recent one, the second one broke down
I also love the Y Class because when VR placed the order with Clyde, they wanted the EMD 6-567/645 engine, but EMD didn't want to supply them because they didn't design them for locomotives, only for power stations
so they had to bodge together one that would work in locomotives, all the while fighting EMD to try and get the engines in the first place
tbh double headed Ns goes hard
You probably know the history of every loco in Australia
They used to run them for horse races and things
don't out me like that 😦
I got the rare double autism, so I know far too much about trains and planning
makes sense
I just like trains cause I went on them a lot when I was little
Double? 😛
I was kinda the opposite, I didn't grow up around them, and the only times I got to see was when I went to visit relatives
but it does mean I'm quite fond of the few trains I saw growing up
the NSW 90 Class, Hunter Railcar, and V set are probably my 3 favourites :3
I really like N’s though because I never saw them much
yeah 😦
I've only been at my new job a month and I've closed to memorise all our relevant planning documents
and I've already looked too much into the history of railways in that area so aaaa
tbf, they're pretty good
also they're weird, being one of the few locomotives in Australia to be equipped with HEP
only others iirc are the NSW XPT power cars
and the Comet power cars
The HEP isn’t that reliable though, often they put a power van too
Especially in the heat
there's a reason most other passenger trains defaulted to a power van :3
that and it was practice because the first generation of locomotives didn't have HEP, and we don't really have dedicated passenger locomotives here, everything is mixed traffic
Yeah HEP was the easy way
at least if you're only hauling passenger trains, which the N's were basically only designed for
although in the early Vline days they did occassionally work freight
I know, but I'm not gonna turn down a chance to spread more information about trains :3
also, going back through photos of weird consists...
look at the boy
he's helping :3
now I just want to know what Double Autism is 🙂
lol
I have been on a quest about neurodiversities
you might say I tunnelled obsessively
I just have too many special interests 😦
AUDHD 😛
45 class done I suppose :3
okay so apparently they tried rebuilding a 48 class with the cab of a 82/90 class
they never finished it though
also apparently they wanted a different engine in it too?
How do I buy coaches for the HPT, XPT, etc.? The high speed coaches refuse to couple to it, and buying more engines is just engines
They just use the MU coaches
I don’t see MU coaches… are they included in the grf?
They should be?
Dont tell me I messed up the dates for them
It should be the first id in the passenger cars
Also, the Tulloch Double-Deck coach can’t couple to Tulloch MUs, although it does work with Sputnik and S-Sets. I haven’t tested with the Standard as there’s no start date where both are available haha
Ill have to double check
The latter is justified tho, since irl the double deck cars came after the sputniks
But yh, I'll check the code this arvo as I just left for work
Yeah that’s not a bug, just an explanation of why my bug report is not as thorough as it could be 🙂
All good :3
But yh, I swear everything should be working fine with the MUs coaches
I distinctly remember fixing their intro dates and setting them to last forever
I don’t see them. Do they rely on a track set I’m not using, maybe?
They just set to rail iirc
What track set are you using?
Also what year is it in game?
No rail GRF, I’ve tried 1950, 1980, and 2000
I'll have to check when I'm home then, I must have messed something up
having a look now, and I can't find any issues
works fine for me, track type is set to TR_UNIVERSAL, but that's listed as "TR_UNIVERSAL: [_AAE, RAIL]" in the rail type table so it's compatible with JP+ tracks
just in case someone else wants to track a crack at it/or I can't fix it :3
found the bug, I set vehicle life to vehicle never expires, not model life
also the tulloch carriages seem to work fine?
unless you mean the Tulloch Double Decker EMU or Tulloch Interurban, which I should probably change so they can couple...
at least for the double decker, not the interurban
I was testing with the Tulloch double decker EMU. Is that not what they’re intended for?
The Tulloch trailers were originally mixed in with single deck rolling stock, and later mixed with the silver S-sets. The Tulloch double decker EMU was a prototype and kind of its own thing, but a very similar design. I agree it's a bit confusing the way it's coded now though
Uh oh, am I the player that hauls coal wagons with HSTs due to lack of roleplay knowledge? 😛
the correct player
I definitely looked at the sprite and the manufacturer name and went “these match”… but I was FOOLED!
The coal wagons with iron ore or is it all purpose iron horse gap filler.
Iron horse is the gap filler atm
Yeah, I'll probably have to change it
Not sure what to tho
If anything the tullochs are meant to be more of an easter egg, so maybe I leave it and just don't mention it?
Interim solution for you being slightly too lazy to make a bi mode version of the new regional fleet is to often an electric that can be towed by a diesel off the wires.
Yh, but thats just not done irl
I'll sort what I want to do with bi-modes in future anyway
Bi-mode trains aren't that hard to code anyway
I know, I'm just lazy
And I dont like including a train without anything to replace it
Tbh I could do dual mode versions of the HPT and XPT alongside them too
They were proposed...
I like how you included a lot of proposed/never built trains 🙂
Found a bug in one of the Chopper set liveries
The downside of being into research 😦
Oooh, thats odd
Idk what could be causing that, I'll check this arvo
I know that feel, same thing happened with JP+ Engines 😅
Its too hard to say no when you find something cool 😦
staged, I know people who work there
if it were real, half of the parts would have been nicked and ended up in some weirdo's garage
I went to a friends who maintains them, and she had box full of new old parts for the U-set interurban trains she "found" at work
how on earth did I miss this
no wonder what livery is broken
fixed, gonna wait to post v9 until I can add more stuff, or for another bug to be reported
They're certainly an improvement over my old 2CC sprites 🙂
yeah, although they did make a good reference at least :3
at some point I'll have redrawn a fair bit of 2cc set, so I'll probably make than into a psuedo 2cc 2 at some point
I had a Tangara as well but I never finished it
I think I saw that on the forums?
I ended up using it as a reference for my own iirc
here it is
Oh nice, I see you're well versed in the deep lore 😛
yeah!
if I wanna draw something, one of my earliest steps is finding if someone else has done it, and then seeing if I can improve on it
I think this is every S-set ever drawn
The original Australian standard gauge set from back in the TTDPatch era
This was the only Australian set back in 2007 when I started playing
Here, found it thanks to good old GRFCrawler https://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?t=14371
Stop by and get help, information or tips on the Transport Tycoon games, or just have a general chat.
fair enough
it's interesting how just set design over time has changed
seems most sets from that era all were real world colours
IDs were limited back then, you could only directly replace vanilla vehicles
ah fair
weird to think that was the case, especially with what we can do today
Art styles have evolved a lot too, despite not having any more pixels to work with
yeah, that's something I've noticed too
a lot of older stuff seems rather flat/blobby compared what most of us do today
Standards have gone up a lot
yeah, true
also, I've sat down to sus out how to include bi-modes, and it's possible
I don't like including a train without any predeccessors or replacements, in fact its one of the main rules for anything I make
but if include the Dual-Mode XPT and HPT, that covers the 80s and 90s
and then with the NRF entering service in the 2020s, that just leaves the 2000s and 2010s that need something
I also generally want at least one new train per type per decade
I could do a dual-mode velocity, but that feels like low-hanging fruit, and I already wanna do an all electric one
I could also just scrap that and make it dual-mode only, and the come up with something more original for an intercity EMU
MUs with coaches of diffrent liveries - IRL this can happen, but is rare
Not that rare for MUs to be painted in different colours for different cars
Here a lot of them have advertising decals
yeah, often coaches could habbve been swapped between sets
or entire new sets could be build from coaches that were not in use
That did use to be common on older Sydney trains, but there's currently no way of intentionally doing it in this set, apart from the Tulloch trailers
Yh, and code wise I'll probably keep it that way
Since there really isnt a way of doing it without complicating the code, and keeping CC
Yeah you'd either have to do livery refits or Horse-style variants. Lot of extra code either way
yeah, exactly
also it's not something I'd use, and idk if many people would use it anyway
so we can consider multi-livery MUs an bad feature
more a future I'm not interested in including
oooh, those are neat
I recall seing this ^^ MU render somewhere else
Yarmolchuk ball monorail aka SHELT
As You might think it originates from russia...
Like most of dumb things...
WHY does the translohr (AKA combination of drawbacks of trollaybusses and streetcars without any advantages) originate from France?
yeah, goofy things
don't ask me
God
WHAT WERE THAY THINKING?
generally is a lot like an trollaybus, but instand of an automotive steer axle it has an smol roll that rolls on the guiderail, and the electric poles are like in an streetcar (one pole in the cenentary, the 2nd one in the rail)
as the guide rail has an specyfic shape it is expensive to manufacture
moreover, as the side wheels (rubberred type) ALWAYS drive in EXACTLY the same path, the asphalt wear is much higher, compared to trollaybusses
and that is only the beginning of the long list of drawbacks...
This thing is actually in the old monolev trainset
yes it is!
That's the place where I leared about it!
But it's kinda off topic for here
I do wanna do a monorail set at some point
but it's on the list of "things I'd like to make if I get the time"
a list which is too long
I may help You
main thing is the research that I'd nee help with
but either way, it's a long, long term project
I truely start wondering how will the european subset look like...
PS
POV: Translohrs are NOT monorails
probably quite generic tbh
they'd still be in the vein of what I'd include
but how would You define europe?
Would You limit yourself to the 1435mm part only?
or go to 1520mm places like russia, Finland or Armenia?
Europe ends on the Urals and Caucassus
I'd just do geography tbh
so it'd be anything west of Poland minus the UK
but it's not something I've thought about too much since I don't plan on doing a european set for a while
priority right now is Australian/New Zealand and American stuff
and then whatever sets I can re-use sprites for
so Europe without the eastern block? 😭
so African and South American sets probably
pretty much, because their rolling stock designs are so distinctly different
Yugoslavia operated A LOT of western made trains
And evan assambled tham locally on licence
and Europe already has a lot of different items of rolling stock
true, but still
may You describe?
they'd probably be lumped in with western europe in that case
they tend to be larger, with harsher lines, and they often use multi-segment locomotives
while western european designs tend to have softer lines, and are only ever single units
for me the difference between western europe and 1435mm eastern europe is smaller than between 1435mm eastern europe and 1520mm eastern europe
good point, why twin locos never took off in the west?
I know that switzerland had a couple of tham
it's just preference a lot of the time
usually every half can operate separetly
so thay are just 2 single cab locos with the same running number and suffixes A and B
also often there are either double locos with design based on single ones (ET41 and EU07) or the other way round (VL65 and VL85)
yeah, that's very distinctly a soviet thing
western railroads tended to just order single units
and if I were to do a soviet set, it's something I'd have to factor in
thay copied a lot of US things, including B-units (busternaya syektchya)
In contrast of 1435mm eastern europe that worked more like western 1435mm
I guess
POV: Czechoslovakia made best electric locos in the eastern block
some evan made thair way to Italy!
(not this, this type not entered serial production)
yeah, czech electrics were pretty cool tbh
also, thinking about this, I could do a combined South American, African, Middle Eastern and South East Asian set
since all those regions tend to use very similar locomotives and rolling stock (within reason)
and I'd be able to re-use a lot from ORP
I just don't know what to call it
Developing world Trainset? Forgotten world train set?
has anyone got any opinions? I've tried writing rosters for each of those regions but the issue has always been the gaps, but doing this should fill them nicely
my concern is potential style clashes if anything, and I don't want a name that's insensitive or crap
South Africa has a lot of interesting trains, there's probably enough there to make a well-rounded trainset
yh, but there's still some gaps, especially with multiple units
but yh, otherwise there's plenty there, and if I did their locomotives, it'd cover basically all of GEs export offerings
Oh yeah not a lot of MU variety there
Also Comeng was heavily involved in the South African market, so I already have an in for researching the more niche details
yeah, but there's a lot of variety in South America and SE asia... but not many locomotives in those regions
so combining them should make a well rounded set, and a lot of South African diesels were also sold to railways in SE Asia and South America
South America has a lot of interesting stuff too, Brazil used to have a lot of electrics back in the day
yeah! and some of them were similar to models sold in the US domestic market, so I can re-use those sprites for the North American set
You're really planning to do the whole world huh
Don't tempt me 😦
but my priority is always stuff where the sprites can be re-used, or easily modified to fit
Don't overextend yourself 🙂
I know 😦
my brain likes to be productive and its aaa
I work and study full time, plus do youtube, and openttd stuff, and I help run one of the largest furry conventions in Australia 😦
You might know about my first GRF, the Generic European Set, kinda similar to what you're doing but for Europe
I had big plans for it but got stuck and gave up
ooooh, yes! That's one of the big inspirations for my stuff
unfortunate, we need a big company colour european set tbh
but yh, I'm gonna bodge together a roster to see if a combined SA, SE Asian, Middle Eastern and African set could work, and if it does, I'll start laying the ground work to actually build it
Some of it made it into the 2cc trainset, but yeah the artstyle is inconsistent there
yeah, that's one of the issues I've had with 2cc
tbh in a few years once I've done my immediate projects, I'll probably have most of 2cc set re-drawn, so it might be worthwhile making an updated version of 2cc set
I look forward to it haha
Hopefully I don't die before then aaaaa
Whaaaaat?
The generic european set was drawn by our Glorious Emperor?
@strange quiver If You are interested I could make You lists of more signifect (by count, popularity and the influence) locomotive and MU classes of PKP and DR (GDR railways), diesels and electrics era
naming would have been difficult...
On the DR some classes were renamed twice...
Eg. E44 become 244 and later 144
you're more than welcome to, it's just it's not something I'll work on for a long while yet
V180 became 118 and later 228
Also weither to include or not types thet ended up as single prototypes or small series, but were important in technological developtment in trainsets, is an difficult question...
I normally give them an id, but just put them on the low priority list
also, bodged together a roster, and it seems a combined South American/Asian/African/Middle Eastern set would be viable, and have no gaps
so it might be how I go about doing it
it also gives me an excuse to do a bunch of indian locomotives
oooh, tbh I might steal that name
aren't thay larger, more powerfull and more high tech than other tropic countries locos?
it'd basically be a replacement, just excluding Australian stuff
yeah, but stylistically they're similar, and can fill the more powerful roles
hmmmmm an new arctic set also would have been nice...
Scandinavia, Canada, Russia
maybe Mongolia, Alaska, Majuhria (part of China) and Hokkaido
I guess? but someone would have to do that
China, Japan and Russia already have sets covering them, and I wanna focus on regions that don't have anyone working on them
||1435mm eastern block||
yeah...
Also it gives me an excuse to add the unbuilt Thai XPT
I need to stop adding so many XPTs to everything 😦
God, thay really pushed the 43 to it's limits
tbf it's a class 43 in styling only
Comeng had to do a lot to get it to work in NSW
the entire locomotive structure and bogies had to be redesigned
its why dimensionaly an XPT and Class 43 are different
Can we have an 43 at home?
I should ride some remaining IC125, as soon as possible, but I don't know which railway company is using them on which lines
I think scotrail has a few left?
but yh, all the main line operators have gotten rid of them iirc
other option is you go to mexico or nigeria :3
The IC125s seem to be as everlasting as the EN57
fuck that means I technichally have to include an intercity 125 in this set
just re-use the graphics!
I rode one in Scotland (very briefly, literally just across Edinburgh lol)
there are also loco-hueled mk3 coaches
I will! I have the XPT interurban sprite which was close to the original class 43 design
I know that some operated tiwh 90s and 68s
yee, and I can re-use them from the Australian Passenger set, since VR wanted to order some
well...
Also remember that UK uses imperial system and Australia metric...
Even converting the design to metric is difficult, as sometimes You have to round up, smetimes down to get the parts working correctly, like in the original
yh, but that's a given, and Comeng had a lot of experience working with American designs from Budd
Oh, Scotland...
I would wait until it gets warmer, and add it along with Wick-Penzance 24h speedrun
0802 Wick - Inverness 1227-1248 - Edinburgh 1633-1700 - Kings Cross 2139-2345 Paddington - Penzance 0750
I hope I could make it, but it might be off topic...
This thread sure loves getting off topic 🙂
Some EMUs have auto-flipping pantograph cars, some don't (K-set, chopper, some single deck stuff too)
is this really a bug?
Its a known issue, I'm just not sure how to fix it, but its on my todo list
Problem is that pantograph code is complex and I suck at coding
I actually tried copying some of the code for pantographs from JP+ but gave up because I couldn't get my head around it
I wouldn't copy from JP+ since that also deals with reversing without turning around which makes the code way more complex
Tbf so does the code I'm using, and it's something I'd wanna keep
Oh I didn't know I can see why you find it hard now
Especially since I want all EMUs to be operatable at 2 car srts
Yeah... But even the simple code still breaks my brain
For whatever reason code stuff just never clicks, I guess my brain is just wired for different stuff
What is it meant to look like and how are the parts coded?
Dualhead, articulated or just cars?
Wdym?
Theyre coded as normal MUs that the player can change the length of
Theyre not articulated
I think it is? I'm not sure as I'm on the train to work atm
Would we be able to pull code from this set to have reversing stuff @glossy compass or would it be unreasonably complex?
I think that's quite common so I wouldn't be surprised do you have the source code anywhere?
Source code from a few days ago is here if you wanna take a look tho
The code isn't compatible
Fair
Thx
I'd be more helpful, but yh, I barely understand it myself, and I'm on the train to work atm
My train is taking me to a terrible place called "cronulla"
sounds similar to 'cholera'
Maybe for a reason...
probably
I only really managed to find one more bug
odd lenght ABB DDs reverse the pantograph on the middle carriage when they shouldn't
Could you get me a screenshot?
Ill have to fix it tomorrow since I'm only getting back late tonight
Annoying, I'll check if its a code or sprite issue when I can
I think it is code
If it is then I probably won't be able to fix it :/
@strange quiver Also an question: Schould I include on my lists of more significent classes gronks (slow shunters) and narrowgauge units and technical trains?
You can if you want
you prefer an spreadsheet or an text document with tables with data about the locos?
I would like to add descriptions
idm
thinking about this again
tbh I could expand it to include trains from countries that independantly wouldn't be able to justify a full roster, but aren't neccesarily developing countries
South Korea might be a good candidate, since it normally would have a limited locomotive selection, and it has a lot of EMD export models
so if I include it, I get a fair few interesting electrics and high speed trains
it also can't really go in any other set, because if I were to ever do Asian sets, Japan and China would have to be on their own because of how much stuff they have, and including Korea in either of them is likely to start a fight... but a combined Asian set would just be too big on its own
Alsthom and Toshiba
||BTW DPRK too?||
China and Japan seem to have MUCH MUCH more 100% indingenous designs, compared to Koreas
probably not, since their equipment would fit in a soviet/chinese set
not all
basically the scope of this set is any country that individually wouldn't fit in another I guess
thay also copied an japanese diesel loco
and made (on the basis of czechosloavak designs) thair own designs of electric locos
yh, but a 2-3 examples like that can just be included as bonuses
for such an country suprisingly large amount of indingenous designs!
yh, but they'd still fit in a Chinese/Russian set imo
idk, it's not something that I feel like fits with this project
that's really weird looking
the first pic is south korea
wish I knew the designation..
I would dig more photos...
영상에 임종한 연도가 안 나와 있는데 1997년입니다.
실제로는 1993년부터 차량정리가 시작되었다네요.
yeah, could be something fun to include
We have Shinkansen at home
loco is likely rebuild 7500 series
the coaches look a lot like JNR 24 series....
yeah, probably
it'd defo an EMD behind that
also, I'm thinking of just sitting down to draw the entire EMD export catalogue at some point, since it's not that many locomotives, and it means I have them for a bunch of future sets
and it means that if someone wants to use them, they have a base to work off of...
but what if You count all subvariants?
there aren't many in the main catalogue
it's basically high nose/low nose and 4 axle/6 axle
Motor variants (horesepower), gering (top speed and traction), presence or lack of installation for heating passenger coaches...
oooh, thats cool looking
I could also include Taiwan in this project too, since its locomotive roster is mostly EMD export locomotives, and electrics from South Africa
and then that opens up a bunch of oppurtunities for EMUs and high speed trains
JP+ tracks voltage differentials is a thing too
Ik, but I'd never include that as a feature, if its OHLE I'm not differentiating betwen type
:/
is this something you guys would actually be interested in?
I don't wanna do it because I'd only wanna differentiate between DC and AC OHLE, which means splitting the electric locomotive tech tree, and that either means gaps, or lots of duplicates
if people are keen on that, then maybe one day I'll do it, it's just not many track sets actually support it as a feature
maybe it could be a feature if I did a european set tbh...
but make it turn-off-able
whaaaat....?
Electrics from SuidAfrika?
I know that thay used american build electric locos and
british electric locos and electric MUs
yee, they got around
of course
Personally I'd never use it
I know it appeals to plenty of people though
yeah, I'm sorta half and half
I would use it, I just wouldn't know how to balance it
and doing it adds a lot of work, at least with the projects that I make
I don't think there's much balancing beyond "what did this loco run on" and keep it at that, though yes that will leave gaps and overlaps but at least no complaints about "hey this didn't run on X"
I don't think it's worth working on until a set is "complete" so you can retroactively add it once there's nothing else to do
yeah, I guess that's the way to do it
but I also prefer to plan everything out to start with
None of the UK sets make the AC/DC distinction. IMO it would be nice to have more sets that do that. In fact quad-voltage was my original goal for the Generic European train set, but it would probably make sense to reduce that to 2 voltages. Especially if Iron Ibex ever gets made, which is also planned to have the AC/DC distinction.
Ibex AC / DC means I could basically produce the roster in playable sections
especially now we have vanilla wallclock
fair. I'm fine with doing it, I just need to know it worth doing, and for track sets to support it
and I need a region large enough to justify it, which is why I'll probably only doing it for a european set
Also good news, I'm looking at EMD export locomotives for references, and the G16 model seems basically the same regardless of country
all of these are identical, bar the Brazilian one that has a dyanmic brake radiator on the nose
I still need to do that one for the Hong Kong set haha
cool liveries
Well I'm doing the base sprite as a modders resource if you wanna use them...
iirc some of the Hong Kong EMDs were actually built in Australia by Clyde
I'll have a look at it if I resume work on HKTS, the current sprites are based on 2CC set and could use some improvement...
fair fair, well if there's anything I do that you want to use you're more than welcome
thanks, good to know 🙂
I'm probably gonna do some Hong Kong stuff to fill gaps in the Australian roster anyway
since Comeng, Clyde and Goninan all were involved in the Hong Kong rolling stock market
and I have some cool unbuilt designs they proposed for Hong Kong that I wanna include
as an bonus You can include this
Alsthom 6Y2, for Peoples Republic of China
bonus fact - it seems that it operated (propebly not only) on the same line as X2000, Re460 and ER20...
Hong Kong <-> Canton or something like that
that line seems to be an magnet for european stock in China...
WHY?
Whilst I understand that I would rather have you support multiple voltages for when you're playing with tracksets which support it. I don't really see a problem with recommending not using such a trackset for gameplay purposes but not supporting it means I can't play as realistic and it looks very bad with tracksets that provide multiple voltages.
generally for me differenting diffrent electric systems in OTTD is an bad feature
It gets more interesting in multiplayer tbh, in single player I don't really see a point in splitting my network up into two
probably not, it'd be outside the scope for anything I'm working on
there aren't any sets it'd go in, nor is it common enough to be made as a modders resource
alsthoms really got exported to A LOT countires
I'll think about it, if people want it I'm all ears, my concern is just implementation
yh, but not in the same way that American export locomotives were
That's probably what I'll do, doing anything more specific seems like a hassle
Fair
but that schould be balanced
IRL AC is more powerfull but a bit more expensive
While DC is cheaper and considered better at routes with a lot of stops (for some weird reason)
Is it actually considered better or just that they got electrified first and kept their systems?
I have really read somewhere that for commuter lines DC is conisdered better
But why?
only benefit is the electrical equipment is slightly less bulky, since its a lower voltage, and you don't need a second rectifier for the VVVF drive
the advantage of AC being long range isn't as important maybe?
otherwise, AC is superior for basically everything
on AC you put the transformers less frequently
unless you're doing a short metro line, where clearances are an issue, then do AC
and AC electric lines are more difficult to steal
also yh, DC is a lower voltage so it can be closer to lineside structures without safety concerns
that's why some DC lines in Slovakia got converted into AC in 2000s!
You can still distribute the electrics around a couple cars...
Eg. instand of having only motors and trailers
You can have male and famale motors (same amount of each type /train) and trailers
Or have some of the equiptment in trailers
If You look historically, at least in europe MUs apeard later on AC lines than on DC lines
well yh, but most EMUs are like that regardless
only EMUs that are all motors are either Metros, or High Speed trains
Oh, I know
All motor car config is rare
I know that some japanese limited expesss/romancecar MUs had like that
If I am correct
probably tbh
DC is more expensive for long distance tracks because you need thicker wires and more transformers
//We define the railtype table using standardised labels from https://newgrf-specs.tt-wiki.net/wiki/Standardized_Railtype_Scheme. Making sure the second position is always "A".
railtypetable {
RAIL: [SAAN, RAIL], //Regular rail, prefer standard label
SAA3: [MTRO, SAA3, "3RDR", "3RDC", ELRL], //Metro, MTRO is before standardised labels due to it being more specific
ELRL: [SAAE, ELRL], //Dual voltage, for trains running on ac and dc tracks
SAAA: [SAAA, SAAE, ELRL], //AC
SAAD: [SAAD, SAAE, ELRL], //DC
IHBA: [IHBA, ELRL], //Highspeed AC railtype from Iron Horse
TR_UNIVERSAL: [_AAE, RAIL] //Universal track from JP+ tracks for MUs
}```
An adapted version of your railtype table for multiple voltages
AC and DC locos / MUs should use SAAA and SAAD
not having them is way worse and you've shown that classes aren't better
yeah they're in Horse too, they just make the spec confusing
hmm fallback cargo labels is possible but incredibly dumb
most authors aren't going to understand that nml is wrapping action 7s (or whatever it does)
yeah
anyway, wrong channel 😛
I’m guessing 25kv like Croatia did at the same time?
p-trak
concept of smol railcars with autopilot
likely to run on-demand like taxicabs?
so many funny youtube videos debunking pods
I also find these ideas dumb
I heard a more radical idea about pods, but it's mad
they could have rubber tyres, so they can go on roads and highways
and there could be different sizes
taxis/microbusses with autopilots?
likely autopilots would never be smart enough to drive on pblic roadways
while highways are easy
city roads
not so much
have you met people? 😛
why wouldnt you want to seperate the pods from everything else?
Excellent trolling 🙂
awful efficiency
Pods are just for billionaires, right?
i wouldnt say billionares have been to luton before
Maybe Elon will
but its luton 🤮
if this got added to openttd coop players would gobble it up
7 hours? It better have a fucking toilet
what got changed?
This looks 100% legitmate
I would not spot that this photo got doctored!
I can find this exact image on google so I don't think anything actually got edited
likely tha cab cames from something called 3600 series, judgeing by the number...
Could be 3000 series or 3650 series too though...
Ah so the original source is a photoshop. Right I thought you meant that you photoshopped it
never underestimate Japanese train enthusiasts
Likely the best country to be an railfan?
tempted to include the GT46AC locomotives used in Mongolia into the third world set too
at the very least so I can re-use parts of the GT46C-ACe sprite
weird to see an Australian inspired locomotive in mongolia tbh
hmmm Mongolia...
2ZAGAL time?
(USSR and USA designs combined)
the version with the TE116 (?) cab looks great!
maybe...
those feel more suited to a dedicated soviet set though
and this I'm going more for stuff that appears in most places
or could reasonably appear in most places
funnly enough the railroad history has somewhat returned to it's inflancy
Smaller manufacturers in diffrent countires creased operation
And just a couple big firms sell variants of the same designs to diffrent countires!
I love the age of neoliberalism
So You say that You love the modern world?
no 😦
irony? sarcasm?
Neoliberal economics have been such a disaster that if I found out it was created by the soviets to destroy the west I wouldn't be surprised
it's all good, this topic goes off topic all the time
weird seing somebody agreeing with me on political topics here...
Orbis HST Operated by fictional carrier, "Orbis Express", the articulated class 501 is the mainstay of the Orbis fleet, capable of operating at speeds in excess of 400km/h, these railsets are powered on every axle, the two power cars that provide the motive power use a multi-voltage supply. Technology in these sets is more airliner than high speed train, lots of CRT displays replace the standard cockpit features. passengers sit in airliner seats as well, seat headrests contain video screens, like many modern day airliners. because the train uses 5 axle wheel sets, the axles are built in 3 sub sections, having a leading axle, 3 main axles and a trailing axle, the 3 sections joined together to form an articulated wheel set, thus allowing the train to round steep curves.
*Mark Wilkes (e-mail [email protected]) *
CRT displays.... Those were the days....
there are a lot of cool drawings on railfaneurope.net
yee, I've seen a bunch of them
those go so hard
Nice to imagine what would have been
hmmmm some times ago I thought about making such docoted photos by myself...
POV
Ludimlla looks glorious in every livery
Reposting incase it got missed
oooh, I'll use that if I ever end up doing it
hmmmm
actually, I could maybe do it with the third world set tbh?
trying to do the EMD G16, and it's weird because I've scaled it correctly, and it looks strangely long
if I have it the same height as passenger cars though, it feels too tall
maybe it's just because it's missing the greebles?
might have to shrink it, it just doesn't look right
I think I'll sit on it for now, maybe it'll grow on me
something between these two probs
IRL the G16 is an odd shape, if you really look at the overall gestalt
it's pretty close in side view to a UK class 66 or 59, except the cabs
I would move the bogies in, there is a pilot plate / step that should be at least 2 pixels, maybe 3
I'll give that a go after work tomorrow, since you're probably right
also this is really useful
I'm gonna release these as a modders resource so I'll include the variants with and without dynamic brakes
idk what version I'll include in the third world set though
the EMD trucks feature here
also random thought, but US narrow gauge stuff post 1960 is pretty sparse, so I could probably use the Export line to fill those gaps in a north American Narrow gauge set
counter-intuitive, but to get the right feel, the brighter pixels are at the bottom of the trucks
fair fair
tbh I normally just use the same chassis for everything, but I probably should have some different bogey designs
I might nick those Class 66 ones actually...
good reference
G16s were low, becouse thay were designed for operation in small loading gauges
I swear that thay would work pretty sweet in the UK
based on the 59? ||The SD40-2 in an other carbody||
might have been an SD50 in actuality, but eh
wikipedia says it's an SD40-2, but I think some of the electronics vary
well it's model number is "JT26CW-SS", so it's an SD40
mongrel
Like the EU06.
Custom carbody
Bogeys similer (the same?) as Class 85
electrics like E6 or whatever that export loco to zuidafrika was called
if it was based on an SD50, it would have been JT36CW-SS
now here, how we define the SD40....
By frame?
God, EMDs designations are crazy and unintuitive...
but it also has the later super series wheel slip control system, which was introduced on the SD50, so it's effectively a hybrid
what was subsequent after F3?
F7 OF COURSE, VERY LOGICAL
also interestingly, it means its similar to a NSW 81/VLine G class
since they designated as JT26C-2SS
I'm guessing both have the dash 2 electrical system since that was stadard by the 1980s, and they just dropped the 2 on the 59s
also I know too much about the EMD catalogue so I must share the info 😦
meanwhale in sweden 66s were classed as T66
T just denotes diesel loco
generally dashes (-) are avoided in class designations (railraod companies designations), becouse thay are ususally used between the class designation and the running number within class
Eg. EU07-001
yeah, but they're common for EMD model designations
that
i thought it was 83s not 85s
yes it is 83
I always get them mixed up
Looking good
somehow gives me PKP SM32, TEM2 and PRR E44 vibes...
returning to this, and I think moving the bogies fixed it
I'm gonna do the other angles now
E211
from the GDR
only one prototype was build...
in 1967
but in it's days it was considered very modern
BTW speaking about GDR
I started making the spreadsheet
diesel shunters and diesel roadswitchers already ready
North American passenger rail services in the past
Makes you wonder where things went wrong
capitalism
if the railroads were nationalised, most lines would still operate, in order to serve the locals
Map of rail services in the same area today
It’s just the blue lines you see on the map and several major cities are not connected
hub and a couple of spokes
Chicago remains a major hub
so, if in USA somebody cannot drive (eg. due to health reasons or police took his licence) and cannot/doesn't want to fly (due to health reasons)
How he can travel between cities?
In the us, greyhound buses are the main option. Amtrak is extremely vulnerable to delays as freight trains are prioritized
From what I heard, most people take trains in North America for the sake of taking trains, except in the Northeastern US or the along Windsor to Quebec City (also containing Toronto, Ottawa and Montreal) corridor in Canada
What an strange country...
Such long distances on busses must be torture...
for such an large country I would always assume that logically main way of ground based mobility would have been sleeper trains, duh?
The US is not a logical place 🙂
Buses aren't that bad tbh
I've done a 22 hour journey by bus and it's fine
We have sleeper trains, they are the only passenger rail transport in much of North America. The blue lines you see are their routes
If you zoom in the map here in Apple maps you won’t see smaller, more regional lines connecting towns unlike in Europe
Most train stations in large cities were either abandoned or demolished in the 1970s amid declining passenger rail ridership
In Queensland, Australia, there's a cool railway system where tiny sugar cane trains cross over big, fast passenger trains. But instead of regular crossings, they use a drawbridge! Normally, the bridge is up, so the big trains can zoom by at 160 km/h. But when a sugar cane train needs to cross, the driver presses a button, and the bridge lowers ...
yeah... queenslands a bit weird
but... isn't this over engeneering?
one can make an normal crossover between standard and narrow gauge
The point was to remove the crossover on the mainline, allowing higher speeds
Technically they're both narrow gauge because it's a 2 foot gauge cane railway crossing the cape-gauge QR mainline
There used to be a normal diamond but it forced the QR tilt trains to slow to something like 40km/h
yeah, Now I see that it is in middle of nowhere (not suprising for Australia where distances are HUGE), not next to an station where trains will have to slow down...
DR locos done, now DR MU's and locos used only in industry railroads
and yes, industral railroads had some interesting locos
fun fact - this industral electric railroad sheared trackage with STREETCARS
IIRC the same thing happened here in Buenos Aires
does Buenos Aires still have streetcars?
Not really, there's a light rail line that does some street running but it wasn't part of the original network
I think this is in GermanRV
hmmmmm that's an very difficult question...
Herringsdorf industrial tram in HEQS XD
Information for everybody - I compleated the GDR list
-DR's locomotives
-DR's motor railcars and MU's
-Industrial railroads locomotives (likely incomplete list...)
Tomorrow i will check some data once again
Schould I add berlin subways into the spread sheet?
@strange quiver DDR set whan? I can help You with passenger coaches too (and likely with goods carrying stock too)
I probably won't do any DDR stuff for years tbh
to be honest I started wondering of making an GDR set myself...
but likely it would have literally 0 popularity due to being inferior and not compatible (more horse like scale and game balance) with GETS...
It would definitely be popular if it was good quality, as nice as GETS is I think many players still prefer the more traditional artstyle. Plus it would be visually compatible with many other popular sets like Dutch, SBB, BRTrains and so on
God... I know literally nothing about shading and I have never drawn diagonal images...
you're more than welcome to use my sets as a reference
after I will finish the spreadshet I will post it here.
Feel free to forward it to the GETS dev's although I am sure that the list is incomplete and some data may be off...
At least it gives info on the more popular GDR's stock (and some of the less popular ones too!)
still, likely nobody would be interested in an set that starts in 1945 due to various ||political and eathical|| reasons and ends like in 1994 (merge of DR into DB)
@strange quiver Good or bad idea? ^^^
tbh with my stuff I go with the "bad things never happened" idea
it's why I don't make mention of anything war related, which tbf is pretty easy with aussie stuff
but... you can just ignore the whole nazi thing even with a german set
just avoid alluding to them at all
I still do not plan to include steam locos (eg. kriegsloks) just becouse thay had DOZENS of serieses (series? seri? serieses? what is correct?)
there are some things that simple schould not apear in computer games
probably, and for some stuff I'd agree
I changed FIRS from Heart of Darkness to In a Hot Country because I could forsee some bits of the internet glorifying colonial exploitation proudly in screenshots
tbf, you have the advantage that you're not doing real trains, you're doing trains inspired by real trains
so you can pretty easily scrub the fascist links away
yeah.. it's something you have to be sensitive about
strictly Lichtenstein, but that has no trains 😛
ah fair then, so not too much fascism to worry about then
only a small amount
I do not want to go into an political discussion
but fascism =/= ||hitlerism|| and is an broader term
ultimately it's pixel trains in a pixel train game
you can include a train, or you can include a different train filling a similar role
slight political offtop
Generally I belive that all radical ideologies schould be strictly banned
I think that has a circularity problem, in that it's quite radical 😛
anyway, unless it's supposed to be 100% realism grf, you don't even have to exclude certain trains, you just pick different ones
but popularity....
in 1945 kriegsloks were literally all around Europe and likely in some non-european countries too
And due to simple no-nonsense construction, wide aviabality and high pulling power were perfect for rebuilding Europe from ashes
we are talking about only an meccanical device
VW beetles too
the design was copied from the czechs
and the name volkswagen was invented by an Jew for another project...
nono, nazism was fascism, it's the example often used in political science
anyway, I might have some toast
tbf you can still include them, just call them by their class number
it is many years since I did a politics degree, but I learnt 3 things
even then, Kriegslocomotive only means "war locomotive" and plenty of locomotives shared that name
ie the Australian Standard Garretts or war time Tulloch suburban cars
- how to analyse, categorise and debate political concepts
- why not to, generally, in polite company
- post-modernist and post-structuralist lolz
"On Exactitude in Science", or "On Rigor in Science" (Spanish: "Del rigor en la ciencia") is a one-paragraph short story by Argentine writer Jorge Luis Borges.
^ pixel trains
we already have reality, we don't need to replicate it
tbf, the definitions in any social science are kinda floating like that
well, within reason
recreate the trains, just disconnected from the idology that created them (unless neccesary)
it's like all squeres are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squeres
Unless in politics You cannot use strict definitions as in geometry
in politics, the definitions are written by the winners
whereas geometry appears to have proofs
somewhat
likely an early design model of the carbody of the EU11 or EU43 (1st iteration of the designation)
and one more time, just as an reminder
I genuenly belive that radical ideologies schould be banned
I genuinely feel disgust every time I see an ||svastika||
END OF POLITICAL OFFTOP
I need to steal the cab of those for a larger locomotive
actually, that's just an EL/AN class
legitmetly this does resamble something other for me
BR clsss 91?
tbf I feel the same way because those nazi fucks think people like me belong in camps so 🫠
kinda? or a class 43
Strange ER2 type MU rebuilds in Georgia
While I like the first one...
The 2nd one not so much
tbh I like both
it apears that there was another livery tooo
another mod. this time with an front more similer to the 2nd gen (facelifted) factory made ER2. But it still does look somewhat weird compared to the factory made ER2s
Georgia is genuenly an intersting country railroad wise...
4E10 - an single section version of the VL10
4E1
prototype Henschel locos
too bad thay never entered production!
prototype 12X type locomotive, not entered into production
Bombardier
some more bombardier prototypes
enough for today?
those one were actually designed by former Comeng engineers :3
plenty of goobers
hmmm interesting, didn't knew that!
ABB (later Bombardier) wanted to get input from them since they had more experience designing double deckers
iirc it had nearly double the capacity for the same size vehicle, but bombardier decided not to follow up on it for whatever reason
Goerlitz engeneers also had good expirience designing DD coaches
Coaches, not MUs
iirc it was in that weird period between what remained of Comeng being bought by ABB, and the closure of the Parramatta office
since that closed around the same time Bombardier bought ABB transport
well they were coaches iirc
the issues largely stemmed from the poor allocation of space meaning things took up more space than actually neccesary
brain drain
not really, they were mostly moving everything over to the Dandenong factory, and the old guard at Comeng were approaching retirement
The list!
For now without subways, but contains S-bahns!
a couple formats, if You had problems
I'll have a look when I'm home
Also
See posts, photos and more on Facebook.
Strange Austrian electric design
Seems like a good gronk idea for ibex @signal gate
The Swiss did something similar
If you dont use it I will
No no, its a full electric locomotive
Not like the electric-steam swiss locomotive
Ooo
Its so cool looking tbh
Pax express engine I reckon, 1800 hp
Italians constructed come electric shunters
It works!
on the chassis of decommisioned stem locos
Probably around the early 1900s if I had to guess
I can't remeber the series designation though
Steam-shaped electric loco?
@strange quiver Please raport what do You think about the DRlist
I'll hve a look now
it's a good roster, the problem is the locomotive classifications aren't ones I use for my sets

