#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 1561 of 1
Obviously no, but I work in design and animation. More states multiply cost and complexity
unless those states are actually distinct from the weapons themselves
which is what i would've done as a programmer
once the tac sprint system exists, it doesnt have to be remade. Theres new values to tweak when balancing it but thats not too much of an issue. It does add a new required animation
bf5 has more animation complexity than this game
Many more yes
Give me my tactical roll and crouch sprint back 
Crouch sprint is a nice utility, yeah.
A bit unnecessary given the maps of 2042 tho.
But for next game, it would be good to have.
Crouch sprint was amazing.
Nvm tactical rolls.
since they had an actual use, Being it would minimise fall damage.
Which got very annoying.
tac roll us just a cleaner way to do the "parachute just before you hit the ground" thing. Its neat
Silent parachute basically heh.
well you could avoid that by just being lenient with fall damage, like it was at release. Now you just get 10 damage whenever
sometimes it feels like i'm the only one really trying to fight air vehicles in this game
Are you me
are you also pulling off sick rocket launcher kills like the clips above?
Most of the time air vehicles barely affect me tbh. I'll only swap to AA if they actually start affecting me,my squad or my team. Outside of that my concentration is flag capturing, defending and keeping my squad alive.
On Orbital it's really helpful to hold A since you can jump from it to B sites. But because it's a roof there's a constant barrage of air vehicles trying to kill everyone on it
most of the people standing on it have zero situational awareness to recognize that vehicles are attacking it
Just like c on shanghai
Take care of any unfinished business and hold nothing back on March 19 for #Battlefield 2042 Season 7: Turning Point.
Join the ultimate battle and dominate your way through 100 free and premium Battle Pass tiers 💪
Full trailer 👇
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iA2r7nS7DU
Hope next game features this map has legacy content or shit like this
what....something that gets giga focused in the first 2 mins of a match? 
ive forgotten since havent played this year...did they already nerf guns, or is that stuff all coming in 7.0? 
They're adding visual recoil which basically modifies how most guns "behave" when you're using those
It's a good addition imo and I really want to see where it leads
Even though I don't get the point of adding such a game-changing feature 2 years after the game launched
data for the next game
jk dice doesnt use data from their previous game...instead spends over a year balancing shit that should have been sorted out in the alpha/beta tests 
There being another 1.5-2 years to the next BF game seems like a decent reason
Yes someone said that but idk lol, I just think they'll make a whole new game that doesn't really reuse anything that has been done in BF2042
At least next game won't be held back by last gen console.
Not that this is an excuse for a sub par game. (2042 at launch)
Hahaha yes but the fact next game releases in late 2025 doesn't mean BF2042 is gonna be supported so far, if I could take a guess I'd say season 8 is the last one and it's gonna be longer than usual with maybe a few additionnal quanityt of content if they're cool
I also assume S7/8 will be the last. But it's better to leave the game in a good state imo.
BF2042 problems at launch were far from only being that game was held back by last gen yes lol, game was just unfinished and lacked content
Season 7 is,'t gonna be the last one imo, they would have probably told us otherwise, it seems like they're going all for one to end of support with season 8, maybe with a map remake from a previous game ?
is devolping very complicated?
i need a backup career and it sounds fun and interesting
how is it after 2 years and half this game still has annoying bugs
it doesnt let me in modes sometimes
Every game will always have bugs. This is why
Get an ssd
Yes it got more complex over the years due to player's expectations being more important I guess and due to the fact standards in terms of graphics, playability (and realism sometimes) increased
works on my machine
M.2 describes form factor, what's the bus interface? NVMe or SATA?
which side do you think got the most complex the graphical standpoint or the actual programming
yeah shouldve been clear, nvme.
sorry
Both. Neither works without the other
yeah the map name is reclaimed
when i load in
the ground isnt even loaded
it keeps telling me to parachute
where would you even go to learn these things
the internet
is it all locked behind a college class
did they fix the falling into the ground bug?
Both, at least for games like Battlefield because you know programming a game with that many players and with such levels of destruction might be hard, but they got the ressources to make good games they just take incredibly bad decisions
reclaimed map?
was that the only one it happened on?
C++ courses, college, online tutorials
yep
Then just practice
where did you learn through
it takes a while to load
I'm not a programmer
damn even worse i pre ordered this game
is it a fun thing to do or is it stress inducing or maybe like a good mix for the outcome
I think programming is fun. It's the weekend and I'm working on my own personal project right now
Could equally be a hardware issue if you have a fast enough ssd. Perhaps gpu or driver issues. Do you use AMD Radeon by any chance?
When you combine programming with super tight deadlines it can become stress inducing
But when you do it without deadlines to learn and experiment with ideas I think it's a lot of fun
Sounds fun to work at your own pace
Whats your personal project about
like if you could describe it to me
at least the end goal so far
My personal project is an implementation of a data format called Cap'n Proto. My goal is to make the best Cap'n Proto implementation there ever was.
What's a Cap'n Proto though
sounds like a rework of a program is that kinda what its like
It's a serialization protocol. Essentially a way of structuring data in a standard way. Different programming languages and CPUs have different ways of representing data that are mostly incompatible with each other. With a serialization protocol you can describe data in a special way that can be used by any language to "serialize" data in a way that other code that can understand Cap'n Proto format can "deserialize".
Kinda. It's more of a piece of a program, not a program itself.
that sounds interesting so its strongpoint is that most cpus can read it?
Technically any CPU can read it. You just have to write code to convert the data from the Cap'n Proto format to the native format. That's what my code does!
Aight time to chose the next AR to T1. Which one of these do you enjoy and recommend? I primarily use it mid range.
- M5
- Gew
- RM68
- ACW-R
RM68
Looks interesting but too hard for me to understand lol, good luck with your project dude
thanks i've been working on it for 4 years

And you're close to end or not really ?
i'm close to a specific milestone
note: i've been basically working on and off on it for 4 years, but most of the progress happened in the last 2
Well that looks good
i've been experimenting with a lot of different ideas for improvements. some of them worked, some of them didn't. it's also a side-project, so i really only get to work on it on weekends
or "vacation"
You look dedicated to it which is probably the most important
does anyone have any other solution for the bug where you join a mode then it pretends it’s loading through a black screen then it returns you to the main menu
restarting my game is annoying af
I just thought about this right now, do we know if Season 7 launches with both Haven and Stadium?
both
no way it won’t be at launch lmao
they already said that it won't be in until update 7.2
it's in the fine print at the end of the trailer
that’s stupid
uhh didnt they say stadium would be later?
never seen that
i don't know, they didn't say anything in the trailer
welp not even surprised
well

first time for everything
i mean youve already played the map so not going to be new or interesting 
but we gotta drip feed that content
genuinely think more devs are being moved to work on the next game
whaaaaaat?
why do you think s6 was the longest one yet 
Hi, anyone have this error launching the game? "There is a problem with your game configuration. please reinstall it" i cant play, i already have all my drivers, direct x, vc redist, etc updated and steam verified files
have you tried reinstalling the game
yeah, two times
i have W11 full updated, and nvidia to
They were probably reorganizing their teams to send some devs on next game or they began progressing on season 8's map so they can send devs to next game once they're done making season 8
uninstall the game and the EA app then reinstall maybe?
I did it too, I play BF V too and I don't have any problems
Does the Impact crosshair on Nightbird's 20mm shows correctly?
I find it that my bullets follow the static crosshair quite accurate
BF2042 is $9 USD online rn
You don't say..

#release seaosn 7 early
Soon
Releasing early would mean delighting like half the community and pissing off the other half. Also, might not be the best timing with most people having the weekend off at DICE. You should never release friday-sunday if you can avoid it 😄
You use monday to plan everything, tuesday it is
you can use Friday to plan everything, then Monday it is
lots of things can happen during a weekend
for example
people could get sick, or pregnant, or both
Maybe they had too much fun over the weekend and can't come on Monday.
Also, planning everything just the day before makes it fresh in the memory
Rockstar exclusively releases content on a Tuesday as well
Gta v was released on a Tuesday
It's an optimal day to release. Everyone is back in work a day already, and in the event of issues surrounding release, your team has 4 full work days to work on any potential issues.
So they hotfix whatever they going to break with the update during the rest of the week
It’s just the 4pm trailer and note drop times perfectly coincide with my journeys back home from uni, on a train ride with no signal
Cause it just so happens the days I go down are Tuesday and Friday…
yeah still too much for what the game's worth
$9 is a good price for battlefield 2042
Yes it is
You aren’t really going to get much lower than that
It'll be free from March 21 to like the 29th or something like that
Then buy it if you like it
Does anyone at times find that their guns don’t actually fire? Only happens at the worst moments like 1v1 gunfights and leaves you severely disadvantaged. I’ll be clicking my left click and nothing is happening and then I die.
I’ve had moments where enemies just become invincible, but so far no mouse clicks failing to register in the last year or so
Have never had this issue on call of duty for example
Probably the current 2 hit kill with headshots thing for a lot of the assault rifles which is being fixed in the 7.0 update.
Why is the. Bullet registration so wonky with a snipers, I'm.seeijg the teace of the round impact the layer but no damage was being done
Because you are playing on 45hz servers
Haven't had that specific issue but I know the mouse input in general is trash af in 2042. Huge difference from MWIII
Well I doubt that’ll change me pumping 6 shots into someone and no damage being dealt
Which is essentially what BF4 used 10 years ago.
But that was mostly just down to a fluctuation in server performance in that instance
I have a gigabyte connection on Ethernet with sub 10-20 ping 99% of the time and I still feel it.
Yea Like the guy is Only 150 so aiming the scope where it needs to be shot and somehow the bullet travels through him but doesn't do damage
That’s the tick rate
And There is one guy who no matter what always seems to be a le to snipe me as I spawn and go to a location like he knows where I'm going to pop up from
Still using those BF4 release servers as the technology isn’t there yet for a multi billion dollar company.
Well there’s a slight difference between handling 64 players on a server compared to 128
Even on 64 player servers it’s the same
This round is barely enough players half the lobby is bots.
I also need to unlock the SoFlam so I can scope in without that sniper glare that gives away my area
Still released like a pack of mouldy cheese though. Shame to see nothing has changed in a decade.
damn but those graphics, so much better then what we have now
Is bf2042 the best bf for a new player? Or is there one that's better
It’s poopoo if you want good play BF4 or BF3
Every game have cheese
I was going to ask for context but I can’t be bothered
Ok, thanks
Wym
I just tired
Honestly it’s quite tiring.. I miss completely offline single player games you could just sink your teeth into without this live service battlepass bullshit
Live service is meh yea
Dude I hate being on the defender side of Breakthrough, for some reason even if we are holding the position the game.allows the other team to take it
Defender is fun
you just got bad team
Having servers for singleplayer games is horrible
Usually either Tuesday or Thursdays
Why is it even needed unless it’s for saving data.
I get why they exist, but it’s just so irritating when you can’t play some game because of server maintenance
We used to have that shit to SD cards in the front of the system and local storage.
You could carry your save data physically
I know ghost recon breakpoint hit me int the face with its maintenance periods right when I was yearning to play it
Live service updates, idk
I could take my hard drive from my 360 to my friends house and use it there.
Fax
Or the little SD card from the GameCube
Usb flash drive was my save file/profile holder for 360
Bro we had 3 players left to kill and we still couldn't win.. I swear I'm getting put on teams with some smooth heads
And calling changes which should’ve been there on release a “turning point” is pretty funny.
Like I'm a sniper and dropping more.killls than most.my.team. .
Regardless of timing, it’s still a solid update
It’s been 2 years needed
It was only in the game because it’s pretty obvious 2042 was a standalone BR title that was scrapped and the player count was haphazardly put into what it was on release.
I don’t see any reason it wasn’t originally a BR, I know some people still deny that claim but I feel like the maps and specialists are big give away
For sure
I also get that with a ipers headshot are the only one shot kill at long range but that kinda makes them worse than the DMar since the rate of fire is slower incannget more shots on target with the DMR and more.aucceaful kills
There are still rumours about a BR for the next battlefield as well.. it’s like “let it go ffs” you fucked it the first time.
BF would have likely attempted 128 anyway. This was by far the most requested change before it released, and the popularity of BR's and milsims made battlefield's "large battles" feel small
Honestly it being a BR makes sense as to why it was so barebones at launch, they probably just kinda rushed together something at the end. While leaving aspects of the original BR plan in it
It did release at like the height of BRs being popular hence why they probably jumped on the gravy train but butchered it.
It can only either fail to meet EAs expectations and be canned, or succeed, which also probably means it might take content primacy from the rest of the game
Since it would need at least a few BR map updates to keep people interested, plus your average sized map in a battlefield game
Rinse and repeat the last 10 years lol.
I get souch XP just from using the Spotted from though so long as my team.is getting alot of kills
Best thing that could happen is EA are bought out like Activision.
That’s why I don’t want a BR in a battlefield game. Dice showed us with 2042 how difficult it was with their circumstances to get out a decent amount of good or acceptable maps now you want to have tens of thousands of people focused on a free mode that’s eventually gonna need consistent events and content
Otherwise you are always going to have that rot
EA rally is possibly one of the worst publishers like they are the definition of low effort, the way they did anthem 2.0 was dirty.
It’s what you get when you have 60-70 year old shareholders who’s only experience of “games” is checkers and connect 4 in primary school.

I don't even understand why EA would sanction another major IP BR game. They already have one in Apex. All that having another BR on the market does is make that game have more competition.
Like how congress is trying to argue this whole TikTok thing and they haven’t the slightest clue what they are saying.
All boomers
I could mention how involved the R&D’s are in their own corruption and spying campaigns but nah

Greed mostly
As if the problem is a fucking app
Doing away with origin was a sad moment.
Oh yeah I meant about TikTok but yep the ea app is weird. I’m a console player but damn I tried to make BF3 work (which it did with origin fine) and now it’s telling me I need a product key and my “pc is offline” and all sorts of craziness
I think I read something where Activisions 600 or so QA testers were voting to unionise so it shows you how bad the industry is as a whole at that level.
Was a euro gamer article
they did tested more then 64p with bf3 but it just didnt work, the gameplay was bad and everything so they stayed with 64p
64 players on BF3? Good lord.
what they never mention in that is if those tests were on BF3 maps or custom made maps
BBR is a proof of concept for 128 and even 256
ex dev from bf3 told that
and he never mentioned if it was on BF3 maps or custom maps
I’d like to think that the only solid FPS title right now at a core level is Valorant.
idk about that, but still thats more then 10 years ago
its an extremely important detail. And as I said, games have pulled off 128 with little issues
Yeah but this is EA here
It’s not technologically possible to be competent enough to properly implement 128 players when you are EA
yeah, but with BF scale i think its too much to handle
The last good title from them was NFSU2
BBR is just low poly BF
What’s BBR
battlebit
its on unity
Explains a lot
Well you cant compare Unity engine with Frostbite
Frostbite can be compared to a pile of doodoo at this point
battlebit got killed by developers wanting to make battlefield and arma at the same time, and failed at both
amazing map design though, wish we had more urban maps in 2042
- Yes I can
- this is about game design specifically
Can anyone tell me why, 3 years after the release LAV-AD (aa tank from the portal), it is able to shoot at me literally all over the map and its range limit does not exist? How is it possible that such buggs still exist after all this time?
Looked good just with vehicles and destruction don’t know why they needed to kill it.
As I said, its a proof of concept. It shows that a 128 player game like battlefield can be fun.
correction, wish we had AN urban map in 2042
well tehnicaly you can, but the same thing in unity made with frostbite consoles could not handle
they wanted to make a milsim, most of the community wanted an arcade shooter, tried to please both audiences, pleased no one in the process
Just make like an airport, a market square or something like the favélas into a map.
I feel like the problem was people shitting on it for not being a carbon copy of a Battlefield game, as well as its graphics despite the fact that it had to compensate somewhere to make 256 possible
The graphics were pretty poor tho
we already have frostbite running 128 people on console. The issue is shit map design, simple as that.
The maps are still shit on 64 players and even on TDM.
i dont think graphics were the issue, I personally quit the game because of the milsim esque mechanics that just felt like they were there to intentionally slow down the combat and the action, like spending 8 seconds healing behind cover after getting nicked once
Yeah that’s fair enough
yeah but that was deliberate.
BBR runs extremely well with more in depth destruction and a 256 player counts. Thats why it looks like shit, thats the tradeoff
I feel like there some people who didn’t appreciate it as an indie proof of concept project, but that’s not to say there weren’t issues with it either
once i realized that I was spending a third of my matches in a healing animation I got super bored
end of the day though it is evidence of battlefield gameplay working with this playercount, hard stop
yeah thats true, cuz maps were first made for 64p. My point is that maps lack alot of stuff they are simple made. I dont think if they remade strike at karkand map the same as it was in BF3 and put 128p on it it would crash
If a team of a literal few people could do it what could DICE theoretically do with EAs backing
I couldn’t see the enemies before I died.. half the time.
a battlefield battle royale would probably end up being one of the worst battle royales ever
Oh yeah for sure
it already is look at firestorm
DICE do that.. but it’s released in a shocking state due to the elderly pensioner higher ups thinking that they know better than people who’ve literally studied to do the job they are doing.
lol for real
Yep and plus the core community who pretty explicitly can state what they want
but ya know how lucky people get with that
It’s what happens when you listen to the loudest voice rather than being competent and confident enough in your own abilities to produce a product.
So it ends up being someone else’s vision rather than a collective coming together as 1
The finals is a collective collaboration rather than a corporate one
And you can see what’s technologically possible
Inb4 “but everyone wants something different”
, like maybe on theme and stuff sure but damn we can all agree some stuff just should not be missing or broken
Technology aside, it’s just fun
I haven’t tried the finals yet. It seems like a more comp esque game to me, I might get crucified for this but I’d personally be interested in more arcade game mode options like maybe TDM
But as a company like EA I’m sure you have to follow stupidly strict margins and completely unrealistic targets and goals to please the elderly palpatines upstairs.
Or you get the boot
Now you see why so many people have left recently and in the last few years.
Because it’s probably a completely shit environment to work in.
Games industry in general but under EAs control even more so.
DICE would need to unhinge and go solo as a company to really shine.
I should probably try sniping in conquest, instead of brwakthrough
Idk though this game just doesn't feel as good as BF4
Breakthrough is a lot more linear so yea
EA doesn't make the day-to-day balance decisions, i'm so tired of people blaming them for dice dice-ing their own games
EA didn't tell them to implement bf5 5.2
lol yeah so tired of this misconception
something bad happens? EA!
EA didn't design the maps
happens to all big publishers
No but its up to the publisher and the rightsholders of the franchise to make those decisions which in this term is EA.
DICE are under EAs watch they arent solo developers... im sure they have some say in it but ultimately its up to the people in the corporate seats to make the final decisions.
if DICE was a solo company they would be bankrupt lol
corporate isnt breathing down their neck to implement visual recoil or IRMs
it's a good idea if you want battlefield to cease entirely as a franchise
you cant blame EA for everything all the time
I dont? And you read what i said wrong.. They are owned by EA.
holding dice to zero accountability for bf5 is why we got 2042 and it's fucking deserved frankly
yes if they went independent tomorrow and was under their own shareholder structure they would be insolvent within a year
Nobody has held them unaccountable? Im just saying that No matter what the ultimate decision is in the hands of the publisher and rightsholder of the franchise in question.. DICE are responsible for alot of the poor decisions of course but do you really think a corporate entity as large as EA would leave the developers the final say on what happens with their cash cow?
EA didnt design the maps, no. But they did set the start and end times/release date for the game, which if it isnt enough time would affect map/game quality. At the same time you cant blame EA for everything. DICE would have accountability for a lot of the mis-steps in the last few games.
In saying that...I do think that the majority of the changes made to 2042 post launch have been good changes.
Brother it was a figure of speech
Cheers Walmart Mr beast
a independent DICE would literally be bankrupt if they tried surviving a battlefield 5 failure or a battlefield 2042 style revenue failure nevermind both combined
Its been the same for the last 20 something years
like you cannot ignore the reality of how games have went
do you remember when they completely cancelled development for both battlefront 2(2) and bf5 to work on 2042 and it stll turned out dogshit?
Embark Studios is essentially an independent DICE with how many ex devs that moved there
they also didn't have a corporate failure which took tens of millions to make in the first place
You think devs made that decision?
"this that studio" is a extremely bad argument
and also embark aren't independent either lol
they're literally owned by nexon
what did the man-hours go to if not making 2042 good? were they spending all day staring at the walls in the office?
Yeah but its like splitting up from Walmart and moving to walgreens
Its only partially owned by Nexon
Like a partnership deal
Following the transaction, Embark will become a consolidated subsidiary of Nexon Group.
a consolidated subsidiary
If rumors are to believed...they were tasked with making a game that DICE didnt want to make (A BR/Extraction shooter), then 16 months before release were told to instead shift focus to using everythign they had made to cater to a core battlefield experience.
dude that's for 2019
Its is a controlling stake
I believe EA is in control of the fundamentals, the foundation that the game will stand on, and how it will make money
did you read the deal?
The deal was made in two tranches, one for $96M, giving Nexon a controlling stake of 66.1% in Embark Studios, which a month later was increased to 72.8 percent. The rest of the shares in the company are to be acquired within 5 years.
Yes of course
they own them entirely now lol
Dice is doing the other work building on that foundation
and apparently NOBODY LEARNED THEIR FUCKING LESSON because the next game is going to be a BR too
Still seems to allow 1000x more creative freedom than working under Electronic Assholes.
that's what happens when a game succeeds and one doesnt
That's how I see it, if I hate the foundation I blame EA, of it's any added work like maps, guns, or bugs I blame dice
don't be surprised
A BR game ALA Firestorm I would actually love TBH. The issue isnt the game type...its poor execution/direction on past games.
2042 was DICEs own failure in their making and pretending like it was EA is a misnomer
The core of the franchise has always been poopoo.. since 2006 when EA aquired DICE
not a soul cared about firestorm or hazard zone and they won't care about dice br #3 either
battlefield 3 and 4 are regarded as the best games in history so how do you rationalise that lol
You clearly werent around here when Firestorm released then. It was enjoyed by a lot of people, still is. The issue with it, BFV was its lack of support and a competent anti-cheat.
Were you there for BF4s launch dude? that was a catastrophe
if you want to doubt it you can view my battlelog lol it's all public information
Goddamn, Lehto's recent tweet just makes him look like a twat
you can't sit there and make claims and act all confused or everyone else is wrong when you get pushed back on
left EA suddenly which led to his team being cut due to lack of leadership
"I have nothing nice to say about EA considering how they cut my team"
Bro YOU caused that
a immediate reaction of saying a person didn't experience a launch is asinine lol
you gave yourself away
yeah man, go blame those victims
company treats the guy like shit and they treat his team like shit as retaliation for him leaving
there's no evidence they done that
I'm not blaming ridgeline, I'm blaming Lehto, considering all other employees have been saying EA is great to work with
all we can go off from is what we know
Lehto's statement is the odd one out
EA said he left on personal terms themselves and that's why they shut the studio
You saying that about BF4 and BF3 when at the time both had a shit load of controversy surrounding their releases and BF4 was half finished when it released. Maybe prolific in the FPS community but I dont have a single friend who plays battlefield.. everyone plays call of duty.
until lehto says something that he was mistreated etc we have nothing else
who are these "other people" lol
yes?
Fight your way through 100 tiers and unlock:
🔫 New Weapons
⚙️ New Gadget & Vehicle
🪖 New Cosmetics
👀 And more!
Make use of everything the Season 7 Battle Pass has to offer, and look your best while doing so.
I have been here since I joined saying they both had shit launches, it doesn't change how it's perceived 10 years on dude
they're still regarded as the best games in the franchise by many
you can go on and be bitter or something I guess that's your right but it doesn't change much
Of course but its merely tainted by it having such a poor start much like 2042..
Theres a theme
Probably also known as crunching
there was no evidence during 3 or 4s launch that DICE were crunched and there isn't any for 2042, we know how 2042 came out because DICE managers literally gave interviews about it so there's no blame something else here
turns out when you give a studio too much creative autonomy they don't have a good sense of direction in what to do
yes that's heresy according to many but it's true
That's why some that do have that freedom depend on the community for that direction
Bold on the some
my personal connections and you can literally find all these former EA employees literally being cut from Ridgeline giving EA praises
depend on? lol DICE were arguing with their community for eons
The games industry as a whole is crunched bro...
has been for the last 10 years
That's why I said Some
they have always had a culture that they know better than anyone else including their own players
it only took a 2042 style launch for that to go away
They go by data and spreadsheets they dont go by the voices of their fans.
you can shit on EA for being money grubbing and whatever but they don't treat their employees like Blizzard or Riot lol
no they do
ok so who are they and where are they saying this
they just didn't think they know what they were talking about the vast majority of the time
"trust me bro" doesnt work here
There was a tweet some years ago about making changes to an EA published title because of "data" even though it went against just about every media savvy player in the community and then it caused massive backlash.
they ofc use data for how they build things but it's not some overarching authority of decision making
it's just personal judgement
Its how a business works.. they rely on data for 99% of their workload.
?
Unless it financially smacks them in the face aka.. battlefront. Then they arent changing. They arent listening to the fans.
?
you orange?
What
I'm orange? I guess
The thing with people like Letho, is that they likely already have "Fuck you money" so when they leave/get fired from a company...they dont need to tow a specific line.
that being said, I did think that his comments were unprofessional.
he literally caused the death of ridgeline then went on to blame EA for it
kind of a dick move
ehh I mean it's unprofessional, understandable he'd have that sentiment
No idea what's going on anymore
when you build a studio personally and it all goes away you're going to be bitter
maybe your point just sucks
Hes 61 as well so probably taking that sweet early pension.
You werent here for half of it.. you walk in the room and expect immediate context but you just spout bs
lehto can say what he wants hes bigger than any studio who hires him anyways
I heard suppressors lower the visual recoil, haven't seen that much information, probably a placebo effect.
You think that? you know him personally?
you create halo, you become a living epiphany lol
simple as that
I wouldnt be very happy if I was headhunted to lead a new game/studio...and before even getting close to releasing said game...it is shit canned. So I can understand frustrations. It mainly sucks for his team members tho.
Goes back to my point of EA being the main say in just about every decision made.
DICE have a tiny voice.
Put the ego aside, he can only do halo nothing more
The job was too big for him
Halo 5 and infinite are dog water
Halo died when bungie left it
Halo infinite is actually fun
Decent game
To bad it took to long to get it to that spot
And they couldn't even get split screen to work lmao
it was led by a bunch of morons
“Then again, we are the development studio with creative freedom, I would argue. We would not try to pitch something that we didn’t believe in, and that takes time. Sometimes you want something but you don’t really believe it will pan out that well.”
I guess DICE themselves saying it isn't enough lol
This ain't nms level of redemption, not even fucking close
How much were they paid to say that?
Brother you cant defend EA.
you can't start conspiracy theories
Theyve shown since their formation how shit of a company they are
What's the difference between "Full XP" and "Moderate XP"?
As bad as Activision
Pulled that out of your ass or what
Point is, Halo and Battlefield both fell off. No reason for it either
Moderate XP is throttled to like 500 XP per minute AFAIK
man your bitterness is really looking absurd right now lol
it doesn't matter what the truth is, EA is still the bad guy. People still think they are wholly responsible for the death of titanfall 3 by the way
apparently so
How am i bitter? Its a discussion..
dude do you realise what you just said or?
Was Titanfall 3 even supposed to be a thing
..
it was being worked on by respawn for a few months then canned by respawn themselves since they thought apex would be more profitable
and they were right
EA didn't even know about the work on titanfall 3
https://www.videogamer.com/news/how-dice-won-ea-over-with-mirror-s-edge-2/ for folk interested in dice interviews, they span a decade+, fascinating stuff
Man thinks everything is an arguement
I feel like they should know a bit about that
EA closes studios whether they do good or not. EA killed some of my favorite studios like Pandemic and Visceral games (dead space)
yeah they knew when it was cancelled lol
Blackbox studios also
Lol
respawn wasted a few months on tf3 but apex did so well so eh who care
it was a year roughly
all the battlefield games on sale rn ive never played one are any of em good ?
the internet will always blame EA because they was voted worst company in like 2012? They have been consistently winning best workplace for a while now
link to source?
I believe they lost that spot
tldr:
hardline/battlefield 5 - bad/unplayable
3, 4, 1, 2042: worth to buy
EA and Activision are much alike.
lol not even close
Ubisoft is honestly the worst
Hardline was a strange release
thanks fam :
np
may i ask what happened to 5 ? thought it was popular ?
Well now you get Ubisoft+ for twice the price lmao
Activision will be worse under Microsoft
the game has been infested with hackers on pc since it was discontinued for support
literally impossible
they make up a majority of the players now in some form
i wanna buy on pc 
It would be the exact same, Microsoft does jack shit in influence
activision before microsoft covered up a lot of workplace harassment
then don't buy 5 lol
One company has moral standards the other is a bargepole away from human rights abuse.
lol
bet
do u mind telling me ur personal tier list for the games ?
gameplay
in that order 2042/4 -> 3 -> 1
Hardline- BF3-BF4-BF5-BF1-2042
dont buy hardline nobody plays it
BF3 > 4 > 1 > 2042 > V > Hardline
whats your budget
i can buy them all rn since they on sale fr
I like 1, I don't like the setting of the game
2042 is like 8$ right now isn't it
it's a good game, just dislike the gameplay
Its unique
just buy them all minus hardline because its dead as hell and 5 because of hackers
hardline peak players is something like 20-30 per day
V also has some stranger gameplay design elements that I don’t really suggest it to anyone because of, like its attrition mechanic
predictable when it wasn't even DICE who made it
I still think we should get a battlefield set like the movie 300 or the Battle of Thermopylae

legit or sarcasm
Would be sick
just play chivalry
DICE cosmetic designers would prolly make a badass looking Roman soldier tho
wont get em all but im seeing a lot of 2024 and 4 so i think ill get those, maybe 3 aswell
Na but first person charging at the enemy team, shield and sword with 100 others around you with frostbite graphics
2042 is recent, 4 is like the most well received besides 1
Yeah BFV game design was trash. I think it's the worst BF game. Can't even heal 100% without medpacks
i remember watching youtube vids with the battlefield theme blaring when cool stuff happens, it was very cool
add new mechanic to promote teamplay, remove said mechanic literal months after launch because of constant bitching on reddit
its still got a few hundred players, main issue with it is battlelog spoofing and launch issues, but for one dollar for standard edition its worth it lol
Oh 2042 after 2 years are now adding squad wipe xp
you will come out hating battlefield 3 lol
it's not a very good game design wise with it's age
Lovely
BF3 is really a product of its time yeah
Its certainly stood the test of time graphically though
I mean it’s absolutely playable and active it’s just, old
the cancerous blue tint
Its what makes it tho
I love tinting
BF3 still plays very good, way better than Trashfield V
bf3 without the blue tint is awful
one word: suppression
Maps especially hold up
The blue tint is really cursed but on some maps it’s barely visible
that's all that has to be said
it is
True that
suppression is not that bad and ill die on that hill but 🤷♂️
The birth of metro too
back when cod and battlefield were fighting orange tint was the way
You get used to it
Yeah I kinda liked suppression 
it's easy to say without actually visualising it
It should be visual only imo. But yeah you do get used to it
good god
I cant keep up with cod releases nowadays feels like they all have the same name.
The only time I liked suppression was when I was giving suppression
they have
if you don't want that don't play 3 lol
yea man and cods gone downhill aswell lmfao
Just dont get hit bro 
it doesnt help this image is compressed as hell
why is it so blurry ?
that's the suppression effect in 3
yes as dumb as it sounds
what is supression effect ?
CoD has really good gun play tbh just fuck their version of sbmm
We did a mach setup recreating suppression. We tried all sorts of combos including myself using cover and the 2 support players NOT using the suppression perk. Long story short it is almost impossible to get any sort of accuracy. After testing this I have two tips...
1.) shoot in 2-3 round bursts
2.) run like a little girl
3.) Try to sna...
thx
if shots land near you your screen is blurred and accuracy is lowered, its not as bad as people make it out to be in my opinion plus there is a perk to negate it
np!
but thats just me
tldr: the game has a extremely moronic suppression effect where if bullets are fired past your character model your camera view is distorted and your bullets will randomly go in a direction where the crosshair isn't centre
I just posted a video above demonstrating
yes I know you did
this concept seems cool but it looks bad design wise in this clip
I mean you arent being fired at from 31 people 24/7 but yeah it was pretty bad
its in every battlefield game in some form until 2042
btw
with different changes
^ somewhat
At least with 2042 you can see when you are being shot
it's a bit different since it got overhauled with 4+ but yes that's technically correct
because there's no assets or textures with depth....
Lmao
last gen moment
2042 should've never released on last gen
Its a pretty stunning game on PC idk what you are playing
next gen had only been out for a year when it released tho so they couldnt resist the fat stacks they could potentially earn from last gen
har har, but seriously even on PS5 it sucks. Just feels like a diet lacroix
Gameplay, over visuals, children. Looks fine on my XB and PC.
Yeah Next gen consoles will always feel last gen due to their release dates and the fact that PC is infinitely upgradeable in comparison.
Keep in mind PS5/XBS came out in about the same time as 2042 so just like Black Flag, CoD Ghosts and BF4 even, they had to compensate for the release of the then current generation given the mixture of covid making distribution and purhcase of said new platforms borderline impossible.
You are never going to have a console more powerful than a PC
I swear they originally said they werent going to support old gen but they did anyway
always
gameplay will always come first
Absolutely
if a game looks like dog vomit I wouldn't want to play it to experience its superior gameplay
That's a fair backtrack given that was probably a choice made before covid killed any plans for a 'timely' dispersal of PS5/XBS to storefronts and online distributers.
I came here to make Battlefield buddies... I guess this is just a spot for consumers tears lol.
there's being artistic and there's just being an ugly ass game
Right
PS5 is still a struggle to get for some even now
Completely fucked that launch
lol
lmfao
you can't shoot up 50 people outside

Because people actually wanted it unlike Series S. That and phishing scammers used bots to buy hoards of them to then re-sell at a forcibly inflated and gouged price.
So that was pretty shit.
Also to do with not making enough supply for demand.
you can but Friendly fire will not be tolerated!
Again covid.
alpha stage looks so much cleaner.. 
gray metro
On a map like metro that blue tint is honestly really terrible to look at
But metro by design isn’t exactly the most lit up map so

But something like operation firestorm you’ll barely notice it
2024/4
"want to feel like 100 florescent lights are burning out your retinas?"
"The hell? NO!"
releases the entirety of BF3 that way anyway
the blue tint wasnt even that bad lol
the worst it did was make some of the colors washed out
the sun was pretty bad lol thats true
BF2042 looks ok to me
depends on the map
it looks bland imho
some maps look great while some are just meh
best looking bf game recently has to be bf1
ugliest is bf5
bf5 hand models

clunky mess
doesn't matter how good the maps look, 70% of your screen is covered by your hands and weapons and they look awful
Even in 1 they’re quiet…. Detailed 

But this has more to do with map design then, imo BF2042 looks good but maps absolutely don't have that war feeling
from the gameplay im watching rn i agree
Soldiers and gun models are really bad
running or proning on your back then seeing your hands/weapons clip into your body just breaks any immersion you are having
It's terrible how it ain't a BF game lol
guns in fortnite have more details
2042 is alright with weapon detail, not the best
bfv was really good on weapon detail
the clothing textures look really off, especially on the portal models
the protal models are hot garbage
lol
portal*
even the shape of characherts its just off
what is this portal i keep hearing abt ?
never played portal 1 or 2 from valve?
bf5 zero visibility and 2042's bland everything makes blue tint seem genius lmao
custom gamemode maker thing with a few old maps and guns from old battlefield games
mostly used for 600% damage milsims matches and xp farms
mind you they picked terrible old maps
oh
Caspian border is overrated garbage
not terrible just the most uninspired choices
I'll die on that hill
so we can say the portal is done, dont think they will add it in the next BF
like of course they picked caspian and noshahr, what else?
of course they picked arica harbor and valparaiso
just very boring picks
no shade to arica or valparaiso
arica is mid to alright
arica is a great map just not the best bc2 map imho
valparasio was that map where they removed the water right
having that open ass area that ruined the entire map
add the water back, and I'll like that map more
the one map they picked that was straight bad is el alamein
people only liked that map because of bf1942s mechanics, remove that and you go from a terrible but kind of fun map to a terrible map
if walking simulator was just a map it would be el alamein
like even hourglass was never this shit
people only liked el alamein because you could baserape the enemy team and steal their planes and have dogfights
if you could even take off before being blown up and repeating the process of baseraping
Why dont they remaster BF2 maps, they were the maps
Oman, Sharqi, Karkand, Dragon Valley, Dalian Plant..
if only they added wake island
im assuming they thought it wouldnt resonate with the newer battlefield audience
not that bf2 isnt iconic but the games that are in the spotlight the most these days is bf4, bf3, and bc2
and 1942 is the first battlefield so easy shoe-in
It was still annoying
well they resonate with kaledioscope
Wake island is technically a bonus golf course in one of the billions of EA sports games
wake island has been in every other battlefield game ever made so it was cool they were actually going to remaster some maps that werent wake island
No wait, I meant Paracel Storm. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biCY0qgT8fs
GOt my wires crossed, my bad.
only issue is wake island is the only 1942 map that still holds up
El Almien looked promissing
how? el alamein was always a bad map and it was only fun for bringing 1942's mechanics to their knees
The sense of scale was pretty cool, only issue being is that it was without much cover
Sort of like that BFV map where you spawn right next to the enemies
They could have given us Operation Metro or fucking Karkand but no
to be fair if they remade metro people would still be mad
Agreed, metro fans are the worst kind of BF players, it's the type of dudes you don't want to be in a bar by peaceful time but also the kind of dudes you want in a bar if something goes wrong
Metro is repayable a lot
And there would have been a lot of dedicated servers for it
people are mad no matter what
well im mad over here for poor flexibility in solo pve
well 2042 is the first game I know to offer it
i cannot determine if classic BF or 2042 have better flexibility
one pro for 2042 is maximum bot count
classic is locked to like
under 16
but like, did any of the titles before 4 have the same ai solo / coop bots type mode
I genuinely don't know
was curious
I know 2 and 2142 did
look.. you can even call me crazy but the close voice in bf is sorely missed.. I'm playing 2042 and I had a tank with low health, I had a support ally nearby and I don't know why he did that, I'm not coming to help despite ask for help using the function......
Yea BF3 had a co-op mode
Though instead of ai battles it was more so intended to be a more flexible version of the campaign I suppose
It was incredible
Really
Did dice change redacted 64 ever outside that 1 time where all the metro hardcore got extremely hateful
Close voice?
Yea they were cool
went to launch the game now and i just got this
message
to login on EA to activate battlefield
wtf is that
anyone else with this ?
why is my bf2042 stuck in season 6?
funnily enough, it's because we are in seson 6
oh yeah just saw the release date
I have BF 2042 installed through Steam. If I get another copy of the game and use it through a second Steam account, will it just have access to the original install of the game or will it actually install the game again in a different location? If not and if the second account has access to the original install, will it have any effect on my stats and progress of the first account?
ok thank you
2042 installs in /steamapps/common so both steam accounts would use the same install, and i think you would have to make an alt account through origin/EApp and switch between the two if you want to keep your ingame identity separate
if you have the stub version of EApp from steam's 2042 install then you would need to install the full version over it to do that
it's just a pain in the ass no matter how you slice it
god, no better feeling than lizzing a killstreaking nightbird
what about M5ing a killstreaking nightbird
the liz feels more fun, esp if you do it like 400m away
Thanks. Maybe I'll just get it through the EA app with it's own account to make sure it's all seperate.
idk when you get them as they think they just got away it's pretty good
Who wants to bet the servers will be overwhelmed on 19th
$60 at launch and $20 on sale 5 months later
as are all battlefield games
I think I spent like $50 in total on battlefield games and I've been playing since 3
got bf1 for like $3, bfv for $5, 2042 for 10ish iirc
if the game isnt too exciting and bf 2042 servers are still going ill wait the 5 months
It's $9 now on ea app
not bf 2025
Oh
yeah lol, i meant 2025
how can i train my aim on this game lol
or warm up, rather
js play
Sheesh, to early for that. It’s 2042 that we are focused on
i’ve been playin, but it’d be nice to have smth to warm up with beforehand. i’m still doing decently well but it’s just kind of annoying
abgrnr, chuck that code in portal
it showed an undefined error, i tried but idk why
yeah it wasn't updated, works now though
i die to x box players with lmgs
laying down
or in corners
Aanj7z hasn't been updated for a while I believe.
seems like the newer test range is also broken
i tried all the codes on portal and none worked
i tried it like 2 days ago and it didnt work
there was a rlly poor practice map made by someone else that posted there
the code didn’t work either but i copied the setup into my portal and tried it with the new code it gave me and that worked
but then i started it up again today and it stopped working too
portal is probably just broken right now
portal is garbage
is DICE gonna fix it anytime soon?
hopefully it will get fixed on the 19th
the only thing good on there is bf3
kinda weird to not have an official shooting range mode added to the game officially
i swear the new generation of battlefield players are so god awful
Portal been broken for a while.
Yeah it fixed itself earlier today funnily enough
Played it an hour ago
This is the one game where I have to take breaks like once an hour just so my eyes can adjust
Goodness
I do seriously wish they add a decent range next time around
I am in love with the M60
wait its working again?
64p TDM my beloved
yup
The one thing I hope they fix in the next battlefield is this spotting system. Why is it squad only? How does that make sense lmao.
it’s the abgrnr one right?
i skimmed thru reddit and apparently it works if u spam the host button like 10 times or so
did u do anything specifically that made it work?
Anyone on ?
nope, just type in, set password, press play
hmm
odd
i’ll try tn when i get home
ooh you got the game. How is it
like is it alright
oh yall talking about training portal maps
honestly i test it in coop
it’s decent, not as good as older titles fs
yea i just want a test range thing that i can use to warm up before playing a few rounds
nice, should do it again tho, the next update will be changing headshot multipliers and how most guns perform
whoever decided to make 4x scopes have no glare im finna kiss you
thought I was gonna have to use 1.5 forever
Holy shit if I run another session of 64pTDM like this, I'll have the M60 at T1 in no time.
If I do manage to T1 every specialist then I'll just run whoever I feel like from there on
I don’t know if I’m the odd one out but I’ve never used anything but the 6x or red dot
Anyone else?
I use the tv 2x
You must already have a Warzone player? It's because during the game you can activate a function called "approach voice" and that's what I'm referring to
You mean proximity voice
This game doesn’t have that. Only your squad can hear your voice
hey does anyone use rivatuna
cuz mine aint working in 2042
nevermind its the anticheat
thats blocking it
DICE fix
(
or just geforce overlay?
You don't need rivatuner
im using amd
whats their GPU software called
do they have their own overlay
I was watching jackfrags play the new map of S7 from the creator preview and visual recoil and feels abit heavy, change looks beautiful

I can't wait till my game has downloaded
S7 drops on the 19th
you wanna bet the server will be overloaded
That’s just a early preview from the EA creator network
Hello players
It always will on the first day of each season for games 
might as well play on next day

yea I saw in the steam news section
Too bad I might not be in the day of the season launch
Imma play it early as I can. But I’ll be on in the evening of USE time kek, I get off of work by then
I feel like it’d look better with some screen shake or something
But I think that looks good
Naw. But it’s not even that bad what people made it look like tbh. But it’s great 👍
The changes were to simulate recoil effect better correct?
It’s basically of what they showed in the update vid.
Yes. Without affecting the gun itself and spread
You see jackfrags holding down fire on the weapon. Still beaming players with the AKS 
Oh yeah in that case if that’s what they wanted I personally think it’d look better with some screen shake added or something, not much tho
Why were people complaining about it again
People said It will affect spread and ect. It will do bad for the game. And it’s too late to make these changes.
They said themselves aka devs that it won’t affect the weapon. But it’s mainly focused on to make the gun feels better and increase the skill ceiling abit more.
You see the recoil and visually a lot more but it’s not affecting anything about the weapon itself
I’m just happy for this change, weapons right now feels so boring 🥱 and dull. I feel like I was playing cod MW09 all over again. I’m glad it got updated.
Yea guns felt incredibly ‘weak’ and boring tbh
Gunplay don’t have to be the best. I just don’t like plain. Especially the weapon feeling. That’s why i enjoyed MW23, the guns actually feels amazing. You feel the recoil, visual recoil also. And ect.
Now for BF2042 for S7, it just feels abit heavier and not plain. Bullets still go to middle of your screen as intended. With dispersion for spread overtime.
new season!!! welcome to bf 2042 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaGUbLynISk
#valhalla #vikings #ragnarlodbrok
Running people over with dozer counts towards his T1 progression 👀
yet people praise bf4 even tho every gun was a 0 recoil laser xdd
2042 and it's version of skill-based matchmaking with no server browser (away from Portal) is the worst thing to happen to FPS. There, I said it.
Hello, I started playing 2042 yesterday. When I clicked on the portal section, it suggested me a free for all mode.But I can't find that mode in the same place anymore. In the browser section, there are only options such as all, conquest, rush, custom, followed.How can I find the (free for all) mode I played yesterday?
That’s fair enough
Bloom reset and tap firing added a decent and simple skill gap to that gunplay. And they’re not really lasers, though they do look like it if you play with a high FOV
A server browser will always be superior for matchmaking in battlefield (I’m neutral on battlefields team balancing system, mainly because I don’t fully know how it works besides sometimes moving players ‘according to skill level’)
The team balancing is not as big a deal as the "lower skilled players don't take damage and have shorter TTK" kind of balancing. The worst part about it is most players even notice and the devs did it because they have to sell games.
The game literally GIVES lower ranking players kills so they can sell more games to Little Johnny who can't afford a PC. Then, when PC players disable crossplay, guess what? There are zero games and NO SERVER BROWSER.
I'm not even going to start on the aimbotting aim assist for gamepad users. Having an actual TTK multiplier for gamepads PLUS aim the strongest aim assist in any game ever created is just wild.
You can try searching for it in the portal, maybe try free for all or ffa under your search, it’s not a “standard” playlist though
i hate to defend 2042 but you are literally just making shit up here
controller gets 25% less recoil + whatever snap AA does, strange instant deaths are usually caused by players on shitty wifi and laggy overheating consoles
dice isnt smart enough to add conspiracy-based matchmaking
“Conspiracy based matchmaking” lol
Activate windows
Nope. Public information.
Rao has potential to steam roll though Paik is the most consistent due to eagle eyed.
Actually wait.
Blasco.
Blasco redacted spam?
Yeah possibly.
I think BF3 till now have bloom or dispersion. I’m not to sure for older battlefields before BF3.
I was thinking of when she was released.
She needs a ton with her utility compared to Rao though, and grinding redacted is meh
I think I’ll mess with Rao and see how many i get naturally
You'd be surprised how quickly blocked spots stack.
casper on spearhead 128
Maybe you’re right I’ll try both and see what I get for each
it wouldn't even work cuz the game is on life support and there are maybe one and a half lobbies per gamemode per region
SBMM never been a thing in battlefield games. Team balancing is also a form of SBMM. Official servers never have that. Battlefield is a pure casual game.
they had skill-based team sorting in bf1, it never worked right though
Skill ceiling is very different than SBMM
People thinking games without server browsers don't have SBMM is wild.
BF1 don’t have SBMM
Or anything close to it
it would try to balance teams by moving squads when you got to a new map, it sucked shit because it wouldn't ever try to break up squads lol
You only see SBMM or alike methods in competitive games like cod/val ect. Battlefield is to casual for that.
Again, balancing is not the same as SBMM