#battlefield-2042
1 messages Ā· Page 240 of 1

Then when people started putting on their own masks I would switch to my own gadget like breaching charges or ballistic shield.
still, seems like an incredibly situational gadget. It wouldn't see much use.
meh
We just need another blood money.
Give us hazard zone missions
Give us special cosmetic unlocks if you play hazard zone
Genevia
š
I think they should just let Hazard Zone die.
it ain't working.
I miss it
Either way, assault and support should be where they focus for future gadgets
Hazard Zzz
With the rate things are going, we'll only get 2 more gadgets so hopefully both of them are either assault or support

assault is truly fucked because armor plate is hated (by me) and c5 with mackay/sundance is also hated

They also made it so the SCAR 2 headshots armor users.
so that would leave them with... smoke launcher
effectively removing the point of running Armor
lol rip
As well as any AR's that do the same amount of damage as the SCAR
which i think is most of them except for the M5 and AM40?
scar has lowest btk afaik
4
yeah but there are guns that do the same damage, just not as long range. Those would have the same BTK in that range.
Oh yah
I know the AK24 does
m5>all
There is this battle rage ability that is pretty much paik XD dope
Still waiting for a 3hk automatic gun (besides bsvm high power)
SCAR is 2HK
i assumed the H meant headshots.

anyway i'm illustrating how stupid the SCAR is after they buffed the headshot multiplier on AR's for no reason
Good
Good indeed
I donno, I don't think it was justified, I don't think anyone was really having a problem killing people with AR's before the change.
They certainly won't now
probablt to make it easier to get kills at longer ranges since due to many shit there is a lot of distances in the game
but that was already very possible.
Yo I can't find nobody to hang with cuz I'm on PS4 so I can't technically join anybody else I'm losing hope in this game
Sure there were guns that weren't great at it but it was possible, and i feel like a change to the drop off distances would've been more justified than the headshot multiplier change.
very possible sure but I dont like engaging at further ranges and before I used to get a lot of ooh a headshot shouldnt be much hp left and then another bullet still doesnt kill ect
hmm dunno
as long as smg can still win vs ar up close its all good
eh, that's debatable. SMG's got shafted for no good reason.
dunno I was running with pbx doing the missions and even without many unlocks its good
at its ranged you can hold down mb
still, it's no contest against an AR, especially if the AR happens to get headshots on you.
whereas say AK or Scar at their ranges (bit longer) I would want to tap fire
well you can still 2 shot someone with armor to the head up to like 75 meters.
I got a 15inch laptop I cant even see heads >.<
well that's not really a game issue, i don't know what you expect anyone to do about that.

Snorkel
munchlax 
i play
Y'know what
I think they added all those vehicles in MW22 to t-pose all over Battlefield
Just to prove they can do battlefield better than battlefield
I can already picture ground war/warzone rumble full of people with vehicles everywhere dropping ordinance and paratroopers all over the place, snipers, MG positions and mortar call ins with rocket launchers popping and flares dropping about literally every single second but in a cooler way
No carbonic, it concerns BF42 so I'm still technically in the nails on that one
Mw2 doesn't even have the bf feeling lmao
i prefer BF over COD bc of how BF plays
Same
not yet, they haven't released the big maps for now
i mean i liked ground war but i feel like cod just doesnt do it well enough
well
actually no
not this time
I've tried most of the guns available
and aside of the shotgun being on the weaker end, it's pretty darn balanced tbh
nor is it a popular game mode really
Its the beta
Shotguns should be on the weaker end in my honest opinion.
that's fair but 3 shells mid thorax (which is already a feat in itself with that slow ass firerate) and still don't get the kill is just lame at that point
that's just funny to me
I don't really like shotguns in PVP shooters anyway.
well since MW19, the betas have been almost identical to final release gameplay so...
yeah but in CQB they're a good addition to the available arsenal
I can use ARs and SMG in close range but sometimes I shit my aim all over the place but where I wanna shoot when I'm in a panic so I kinda want something like a shotgun that I can hipfire confidently
eh, i feel they appeal to people who can't aim and aren't willing to learn.
I mean a shotgun is goot for clearing rooms
I personally find that incredibly annoying, as someone who generally likes getting better at video games.
Play ranked ez
is MW22 even gonna have ranked play?
...Oh god that would be fucking cancer with crossplay actually, unless aim assist is disabled
I heard its gonna have one
they didn't say anything about it, i don't think.
I can aim and I'm willing to learn how to aim a new gun
(hell, I'm obligated to just for the camo grind)
but when I don't feel like overclocking my brain to get a few kills, I want something of simpler brain power requirement
Cod vehicles aren't particularly good.
have you tried them ? which game mode are they in ?
Eh, it's not about overclocking your brain, it's just that shotguns require literally no brain activity to use, really.
No countermeasures. Limited view arc, no way to repair.
you could also shoot down cod killstreaks pretty easy including helis
which game mode are they in ?
that's the beta
I thought they added flares this time ?
and gas stations enable repairs apparently
I donno, I'm probably not gonna play Ground war.
Maybe the 20v20 Invasion mode but that's it
Im probably gonna wait untill its like 20bucks or something
you can't say anything about it if you don't even try it tho
when would that be lol
yes i can.
Who's gonna stop me?
Ground war in itself is just people camping for streaks.
The game is gonna last 3 years they said
your opinion is quite literally invalid if you judge something that you aren't even gonna try once tho
Can't really expect me to play something i'm already not that interested in from the outset.
My opinion is that i am not interested.
I'm more of a smaller scale player, 6v6 is fine for me.
then you and me have played different games
because while there is sniper campers like in BF but slightly worse, people do move around a whole lot
Amazing to hear people moving around in that mode considering the quick ttk and that.
Nothing has been able to recreate that battlefield feeling successfully
On a different topic, I'm surprised that one map they showed off that takes place on a race track isn't in the beta.
I can play hardline with better crafted maps and similar TTK.
@next onyx you didn't tell me which game mode has the vehicles
I tried TDM, Dom, prisoner rescue and knock out and they're all 6v6
were you invited at COD NEXT then ?
Ground war vehicles. If that wasn't obvious enough.
I'm still not sure what people mean when they say "that battlefield feeling".
That seems like an incredibly subjective thing.
My view is coming from the mw beta and the free weekends.
Combined arms, team oriented, heavily strategic combat
you meant MW19 ? I thought you meant MW22 all along because that was the subject at the start when I talked vehicles bruh
To be fair I don't expect them to learn much with the vehicles.
If I wasn't clear enough my bad.
I've only ever experienced 1/3 in an actual Battlefield game.
COD should take away the one shot kill dmg from snipers lol
It certainly is subjective, to some people bf is just cod but on a bigger map, I on the other hand feels itās far different
make it a certain distance haha
Playing cod with that quick ttk. It feels cheap but it doesn't ironically.
considering how greatly improved are the weapons and the maps, I wouldn't be so sure about that
That's stupid.
it was stupid when BF1 did it.
im just saying no good reason really lol
Battlefield does vehicles better for the most part.
Playing through vanguard and fighting Sherman's all they were were just glorified battering rams.
Different game but you know. With the time they've had to improve I don't expect much.
I mean, BF is an arcade shooter that takes itself more seriously. That's all it is.
when i played 2042 it also felt sooooooo cheap

I hope the next bf will be bettee
I'm sorry but having no traction whatsoever on the light truck, no balance whatsoever in the air vehicles and blowing up at the slightest touch in armored vehicles doesn't feel so much better than ground war
Has it decreased scince bf1?
Besides, cod just doesnāt look fun to me. Too many cheesy mechanics and pretty dull combat
And the guns that kill quick are often very limiting.
It looks fine to me.
As long as its not fast as mw19 il'get it
Light truck? You mean the arty truck from bf1 or the C RAM from 2042? 2042 doesn't do land vehicles much justice. It's why I said for the most part.
That's the appeal.
Its like battlefield but playing it on 3x speed
I like going fast.
I haze it
2042 doesn't do justice to anything

Yeah I meant 42
I get your point
I mean it does justice to its gunplay and air vehicles.
Thatās just based on what Iāve seen though, Iāll wait to play the beta before a final judgment
wtf does the RAM AA have a lock range of like 200m?
felt really cheap to me

subjective i guess
I have 1k hours in Black Ops 2 multiplayer on PC.

I don't remember much about it at this point.
It was simple
Ye
Little bullshit.
I mean there was meta, but like
It wasn't too overbearing.
Hey look you can run a funny type 25.
Sorry I gotta watch breaking bad. Take care!
:(
cya 

Like now you have no recoil guns that even an 8 year old can use
You need zero skill
I got pinged by a mod almost an hour later for saying a cod related comment here lol
Then the discussion just shifts to cod involving a separate mod
The fuck
Weāre discussing the differences between cod and bf
skill issue
Also yes, skill issue
skill issue my friend
proximity ?
š¤£
Although proximity is nice
proxy will only be in dmz and warzone 2 sadly
in my battlefield experience these things happens with texts
using bad words and calling each other cheater ššš
wouldve been funny if it was in mp as well
Bf is just "*******"
would likely be a problem due to the size of the maps in 6v6
would make team communication a pain
imagine being behind some and you just whisper
then execute the enemy

I only heard 1 person using a mic to talk strategically lol

The rest were people with unmuted controller mics or just angry when they die
Such is the way of the duty of call
I use text chat more than voice most of the time, since most of the time, people in my squad donāt speak English
i think people communicate a lot in rainbow six siege to blame each other
still havenāt found the typical cod match
Entertaining nonetheless
No complaints here
Proximity is tricky tho
I've only seen it in mmo games like elder scrolls online. I can't imagine it being in 2042
Lol just hearing it in breakthrough I'd lose my mind
generally in games that have local/global whatever voice its a good idea to mute
unless you want earrape for content and shit

Is 2042 on the gamepass yet?
no
Alright thanks
Hey attachments I have the necessary kills for arent unlocked what do I do?
Reach the next kill milestone
Iāve got like 9 attachments I canāt use
Well I can't really do it rn so I thought about asking
Or wait for DICE to fix that bug
Spoiler alert, they won't
You guys should create a new class named dead weight
its already a thing and its called squadmate
Nah it's called recon.

Spotting and insertion is very useful
Limiting them to only snipers was dumb though
beacons are so useful at the back of the map
Only engineer and recon should have snipers, but they shouldn't have just snipers
i miss carrying repair torch and rocket launcher
Haha classic setup
i also miss shouting at allieās āHERES YOUR AMMO GO GET ITā
What time zone are you in? I have a PS4 as well. I'm in EST. I usually play on Saturdays tho
It was easier to get the m60 in 2042 then it was in bf4. Thank the lords
Every time I play for the first time, it's the end of a round whhhyy
Cus some people leave if they're losing and you get dumped in
nah man i got the m60 in bf4 when them russians turned to The allieās in D-Day
The BF4 M60 sucked, for some reason the front sight was always present and it blocked your vision
it was really annoying
Sad
Rush XL gotta get a longer timer
We were attacking on noshahr canals and had been slowly pushing forward
Last sector, last mcom about to be armed
"Defeat"... sadge
Gotta have a timer per sector rather than match timer
Hey btw
I spawned on this weird beacon which spawned me in the air
Looked like a radar dish
Wtf is that?
thats the ebcram deployable spawn beacon
if its placed outdoors it spawns you in a paachute
I donāt know what that is
Itās not equipment is it?
the ebcram is the new tank thingy
It can place a spawn beacon?

just hide it rly well and cos it starts you so high up you can basically just fly anywhere
When I spawned in I couldnāt move for ages
skill issue
dear battlefield please let me sit in a que instead of joining a game about to end
What w are re the best bsv scopes for console?
the one that comes with the gun
Hello

Anyone interested in joining a milsim server
No
nice link
Thanks Iāve been working on it
Is the AM40 worth grinding attachments for?
It's fine at
ing
Itās kinda inaccurate, feels like it should be an SMG
The headshot damage and ammo count for the am40 are still bugged 
Just seems like a K30 with slower TTK
It is kinda billed as one, to be honest.
I like the AM40, but I believe the ammo types are bugged, right?
The Standard issue magazines are 20 rounds, when they should be 30 I think
duh someone literally just said that above
hope they fix that soon
Dice did say the am40 is a sorta mix in between smg and AR
Also headshot multiplier is bugged to use smg instead of ar
Finally got my m5a3 T1š¤”š
yes
Am40 is good on the inside of the ship on stranded tho
Who's down to play some battlefield with me I'm on PS4 it's a struggle
let's do it
And inside of data center on exposure
@vast cloak 
Yeah I got all the attachments and Iām like is it worth continuing to use it?
PC MASTER RACE
big brain
Yo is the m16 good?
Pretty Lack luster tbh
Rip
Recoil is crazier than the last LMG, a developer said they would patch it though, I hope it will come soon
Its recoil pattern is substantially different than the rest - seems like they didn't do a "2042 balance pass" after all
That said, it's underbarrel grenades are pretty good, and it has decent punch if I recall
It feels like a raw Portal weapon, I checked stats and they are the same with Portal version of the weapon so that's not surprising
thats good to know at least
Yeah I just hope it will get patched in the really next update
I thought the whole point of 'waiting' was to make modifications to fall in line with 2042 weapons, add unlock progressions, cosmetic support, etc.
and none of that happened š
Shame, because S2 has been a nice season/update otherwise
Me too and that's what they firstly announced, it seems like they made us wait for nothing special finally
just a real random thing to swing and miss on
I feel like the Hk416 is the only decent portal weapon
yeah, and thats not even in the lineup yet as a Vault wep in the coming future
hopefully one day it will
It could be perfect in AOW tbh, I still don't get why we didn't get it yet
Because Dice is incompetent now
After 2 seasons game is over anyway
Imagine it's the last weapon they're gonna release
I think specifically, they had bad leadership and planning. The newer content is better, but I bet you some infrastructure thing made it harder to do something simple like port a Portal wep over to AoW. Because of poor planning earlier
Within their own meta these guns are as powerful as they were.
but hopefully the new leadership can turn the studio around
You know what I want? A modern but not xm5 m4 weapon
Probably not a full team of dev o the game though, that makes things happen a way slower
Yeah that would be real nice but Iām not holding out hope
My guess is it's a typical "post-launch" dev team, which yes, is much smaller than production
Like M4A3 ? Me too and that's what I expected as you can see this weapon in all artworks
Yes while this game needed far more devs on it post-launch if they wanted to make as much content as they initially planned to do it, I just hope all the other devs are on the next BF
Something like that, maybe something from mw2, these types of m4s
100% that's the crux of it, a standard post-launch crew was not enough, since the game literally wasnt even done
so that crew needed to finish a game AND make post-launch content
hence why everything took so long and why each update has not much
Man we're still 10 days away from the late sept update
Isn't it scheduled for sept 27-29th?
I thought it was a soft "late sept, early oct"
Yeah just crazy after 10 months we only got 5 new weapons and 2 maps, bot what they promised at all and not what we expected
but - so far - they've been hitting their monthly cadence, so unless something holds them up, I'd expect it in Sept.
they were actually even early last month if I recall
Dice is not capable of releasing two big updates a month so I'm assuming it's late September
And then mid October we get orbital rework
yeah it's roughly a month, they were a bit faster last updates, 8/1 was 1.2 and 8/28 was 2.0
so yeah I think late Sept. is where we'll be for 2.1
I really wonder what season 3 and 4 will look like, I don't see them getting us more content than they did with these first 2 seasons
I imagine it will be the same, theyve even said that
Maybe we'll get real weapons
So far we've got an abomination of an assault rifle and an lmg that punishes you too hard
1 new map, 2-3 new weapons, 1 gadget or throwable, 1-2 new vehicles, 2-3 map reworks throughout the course of the season, 5-6 vault weapons throughout the course of the seasn
Oh and don't forget the crossbow with the bsvm
Yeah and considering game will die after season 4 we'll never get the game's major improvements we wanted like night maps and more important, naval combat maps
I could see night maps happening. Naval would be tough, because I don't know how good their water mechanics are, doesn't seem as good as BF4/BF1 etc
Still not new weapons to me as crossbow is a gadget and BSVM just a remastered AS VAL
Given Zampella's recent comments too, I anticipate a total "back to basics" for the next Battlefield entry
or, at least, back to prioritizing fun that people enjoy
Yeah I think it's over for naval combat gameplay, the core game doesn't seem to have these BF4 naval features like going under water and doesn't even have maps with a decent water area
lol
right
obviously the work wasn't done in time, maybe they wanted to, but had to cut it
They're all uninteresting for me. I'm yet to say "damn this weapon looks sick" to all so far seasonal weapons
I want some tactical weapons
I've enjoyed the new weapons to be honest
mp5, ar-15 variants
Yeah they really have to make fans to trust the franchise again and that will be hard of they make the next game like BF2042, I hope we'll get classes back and a decent amount of content unlike this game has
Yeah I understand I also feel disappointed by new weapons, but as excited as I was to see new weapons coming to BF4 for example
I think they need to move to classes again, but I'm ok with specialist-like abilities you can equip.
Then if they want to monetize, let players customize their solider with gear from battle passes, etc: helmets, backpacks, camos etc.
but each class has its own trademark gear item, etc.
Game lacks real existant modern weapons like M4, AKM or L96 to me
Exactly
How the hell do you screw up the laser sight and still have it broken after 10 months
It's an interesting time to be a Battlefield fan. 2042 is at least more or less fun and enjoyable now, but it truly signals the end of an era. Hell, Gustavsson's departure alone signals that
The real problem I have with specialists is they don't instigate templay at all for some of them, I really want classes back but I am not against some specialization gadgets like Angel's or Falck's ones
So, it's a new era now under Zampella/Coutaz. Zampella has an amazing resume under his belt, so it will be interesting to see if and how he can improve Battlefield
Major error they did to me was to think they had to follow recent trends and do it like COD or Apex with specialists and lot of cosmetics, BF is BF and if they want to make a great game they have to make it look like a true BF game to me
Right, and the problem is even if they followed a trend, it could have been pulled off if fully realized, thought out, playtested, etc. and it wasnt. SO much so that they had to pivot at the last minute, the wreckage was the resulting game
Battlefield Moment
No solid vision from the beginning,
Tis why I love playing the game
Is there any upside to using the SVK over the DM7?
They didn't even do a good job of monetizing cosmetics, attachments.
Imagine scraping a 20 year old Battlefield standard also known as "classes" to follow trends
Wtf is this mindset
A lot of people have been asking for that since launch but they really want us to play specialists, would be a shame for them if they had to recognize specialists were a bad idea and letting you play without specialists is equivalent to doing that
Because for that market to work, they need to have LOTS of things to buy... and there's NO weapons!
I don't think anyone knows what went on behind the doors for dice.
@lucid goblet you still popping up on my twitter although I hardly play this game anymore. I once got a double headshot snipper kills through smoke. Nice tripple kill.
Yeah because why innovate? Do the same thing for 20 years and don't try to push the envelope as designers. That's a good idea, huh?
They're trying to make us cope.
What they were told to do, What their mindset is, etc.
Yeah they just thought they could copy paste specialists trend on other FPS games but it seems like they didn't even figure out that gameplay was negatively impacted by specialists before launch
For sure, but I can speculate it came down to lack of continuity in the pipelines between the fibers of EA and DICE
Cope ?
For sure Sync.
Their Major Error was being money hungry greedy bastards thinking the battlefield community was like the cod fanbase that would eat any shit up that the company would feed us.
EA wanted this game out, They know people will buy an unfinished product.
It's called a core Battlefield feature. The whole franchise was built on that, they could literally innovative in any other way except fucking up the structure of the game
They get more money off micro DLC than they do off the actual game itself.
Not to mention that this is in the agreement
The silly thing is I could think of a greedy, money hungry version of Battlefield that actually was fun and kept players in. Again, keep classes, and monetize the fuck out of player customization
Exactly: Money is the motivation behind these decisions
I said that months ago but most of people weren't agreeing with me at all, glad to see I am not the only one thinking that
I gave up arguing about it and stopped playing lol
Accept the fact that we'll not get the AI skins and classes without specialists
Core Battlefield features are large maps with lots of dynamic elements and ranges of engagement in a team based environment. "The character you're playing as" has nothing to do with the Core Battlefield Experience, you're just bringing that topic up because you subjectively think Classes were core. They're not. Your subjectivity is blinding you
Is there any xp portal servers on rn
stop distrubing me with notification
Classes are the core of how these games functions.
And stop arguing
Hello
Yeah Iām at that point now too lol
Hello
you can mute channels/servers
Humans argue
Yes don that
šÆ since 1942
Yeah we've all learned to move on. People still feel the sting of launch.
š
lol
I think I got to S60 something but probably never make 100 now
wow battlefield has a lot of fans
Ha yes I get it, and yeah now it's over gameplay will never majorly change and that's why I don't have any hopes for this game to really get better, I just hardly hope they will not commit same errors in the next game
Launch was better than this...
Does the SVK have any actual advantages over the DM7? I feel way better using the DM7 over the SVK
Launch was awful.
Despite the most recent game, it is a long-standing and generally well-respected franchise in FPS
yes but 4 is better
Idk what to focus on, the bsv or the dxr
The franchise still has value
Yeah⦠Iāve jumped back on the Destiny train again and when I want something pvp I play Shatterline
I don't care that bf4's was worse. Launch for this was dreadful.
At least weapons were more realistic than them trying to force ARs on us
Funny it is the best
I find both for different reasons. BF4's launch was worse for servers/connections. 2042 for gameplay/content/maps
The visual recoil is annoying
On svk
battlefield 4 is better than 2042
Is there a reason to use the sws when you have the bsv and dxr?
Nvm the technical aspect of this game's launch.
They have been trying to copy CoD and force players to use ARs
I think everybody here would agree haha
SWS is a bit of a better middle ground.
lol
But ARs are cool
Battlefield has also always been about teamplay and this game doesn't really have it to me, it's mostly due to the fact a lot of specialists don't instigate teamplay at all because they are made to be individual ways to play
You're still making no sense because assault rifles have never been forced. They are very good yes, But so are submachine guns and LMG's.
And not meant to dom the cqc feild
I mix a little bfV but just weekly missons. I saw recently on my twitter some leader working at the company admits the team strayed too far away from"battlefield" with the new ideas. I stopped arguing now anyways just moving on. Literally came back to congrats Carpo on a nice kill because he popped up randomly on my twitter again š
They still don't have a repair specialist, an really won't until late S3 class rework (bc all Enginers will have the repair tool)
Good day all gameloft update battlefield 4
Meet angel
I've just been watching TV like always.
it is better
Everything in this game repairs itself already
nah he's no repair specialist haha
Repair tool kinda helps.
Yeah I saw that too. Iām glad they acknowledged that out loud. Gives me a little bit of hope for the next BF entry. So until then, we play other things I guess lol
Personally I prefer teamplay in BF2042 as the "optional, yet also optimal" way to win, as opposed to the "absolutely required" from the older games.
It makes the game more casual, more approachable, and more rewarding for those who actually put in the effort to work together.
It's better
Yeah but not to the same extent of having an engineer
It really does help even if vehicles can repair themselves in bursts.
Yeah for example and that's what makes me upset so hard, specialists gadgets are just meant to be individual while they could have built them around teamplay like Falck's pistol for example
But he's God compared to this new specialist
Falck is a better medic than Angel.
You got that right š»
I do think his ability is more useful, but Crawford is nice for point defense - good in certain situations
Crawford is an engineer support mix.
But she can't gib ammo so....
Falck and Angel are more offensive support, so a defense support makes sense too
Ammo crate.
donāt hate craw like that
Angel cannot resupply gadget ammo outside of his loadout crates which are already finnicky.

I prefered BF4's kind of teamplay, like you really needed to play with your mates and help if you wanted to win the game, gameplay seems more individualistic in BF2042 to me
Run an ammo box on falck and you're doing Angel's job but better.
I like Crawford. With a well placed turret, you can really fend people off and kill careless players. Or soften up players for teammates (sorry wrong reply)
Angel: revive @ 1/2 + ammo
Falck: revive @ full + no other
But like I said, he's very defensive minded
His spread is wider than an elephant...& It overheats after 2s
Just throw down ammo crate and your worries will be fixed.
poor Top G getting dissed on for no reason
skill issue
Ammo is relatively easy to come by anyways.
I just wish Craw's turret health was a bit higher. He's easy enough to snipe out anyway, so might as well give the turret some meat
EA issue
Not to mention you can carry three different mag/ammo types and just switch to your others when you run out of one
I think thatās probably what you meant though
To a degree. I mean with Scavenging.
Crawford mfs when I force them to play on ps4 and xbox one (the minigin heats up 50% faster)
True
But yeah switching your ammo types helps too.
It's bs
Not in combat
Wdym bs
I do wish that instead of each mag type having their own ammo pool.
The turret is bs
Yea
It's extremely easy to empty your mag, mid reload put a new mag of a different type in.
it's really easy.
Agreed
Again. If ammo types shared a collective pool instead of being individually owning their own numbers that'd be nice.
You can carry 200 / 250 rounds if you fill up all your slots with standard ammo on the AK.
If shotguns were a 1shot @ 20m or less that'd be nice
We've already gone over this....
Theyād be way overpowered
12m already has no issues at that range tbh
Yeah we have. It's not all too difficult. Just abuse people with the saiga anyways.
Especially with slugs being broken
They'd represent true cqc -_-
12m is already extremely strong in cqc
They should increase the hipfire spread on the 880 and make it a proper shotgun, Not a sniper shotgun.
and youāve got smgs as an option for cqc as well
And it should only be a sniper shotgun with slugs.
A sfar is 2 shots @ 10m
12m is 3 -_-
The SCAR kills you in two shots if in the head.
if you land both headshots lol
Yes, itās my favorite SMG
I love it stylistically as well. Big fan of the Striker 45
That is my main when I keep getting killed be ARs
People with the vector are funny.
SCAR H is fun for sniping people.
Wait they added the BF4 medic helmet for Dozer š©
mmm nice
And then if you just want to push use the PBX.
It's not much of a clip.
I just found the end funny.
And the predicament I was in.
"Oh no bad timing"
PBX feels a little better at slightly longer ranges than the other smgs as well thatās the main reason I prefer it
I just like how quickly it kills at close range.
It's always been a sleeper.
But now people have recognised hey it's a good gun.
Just fun abusing people who use the vector with it.
Imo the K30 should beat the PBX....
I agree. Iāve been running around inside the ship with the AM40 like itās an smg doing similar things. With wrapped suppressor and subsonics itās a 0 recoil shred machine up close
Yeah it has that going for it.
I'm not sure what would make it better but not overpowering.
When Iām outside I usually have the drums equipped but the reload speed is slow so inside the ship running around like a maniac the subsonics are nice lol
Subsonics feel fine to me inside because itās all super close range
I immediately feel the difference if I step outside and need to shoot someone further away though
And overall the AM40 still sucks real bad at medium-longer ranges
It would help if they fixed the headshot multiplier
I run HP extended.
With the tac comp.
I wouldn't mind it if HP extended had a bit better range to incentivise the use of it.
It's a 5HK 800 RPM gun you should do better than that.
Yeah I like the HP ammo for outside at longer range. I actually think all the gun is really missing is a long barrel option tbh
Would rather a BF4 heavy barrel.
That increases velocity, vertical recoil and accuracy.
Infact I think the portal heavy barrel is the pre buff heavy barrel.
im seriously considering buying this game but i was wondering is it in any better state than launch
im on ps5 btw
I swear it increased the velocity.
The game is in a better state than it was from launch.
There are a bunch of issues still present but it's mostly playable.
Definitely a better state than launch, but youāll receive mixed opinions about whether itās worth buying at full price. I personally am still disappointed in the quality of this BF entry overall so Iād say wait for a sale
Still fun to play though
Tbh thereās not a lot of good options in the FPS world right now so it has that going for it lol
it seem like it truly but i was wondering is it still worth full price
In my opinion, nah
yeah if youāre on the edge just wait for a sale
What is full price anyway? Still 60 USD?
70
Good grief
im next gen

Yeah Iād wait for a sale for sure
i was waiting to get 2k on sale too lol
Yeah Iām on PC I canāt even remember how much I paid
i mean... it often does if you actually hit your shots, which the enemies in that clip quite clearly didnt lmao
using a specific gun isn't an instant win button lol, stats don't mean anything if you can't aim
I will say that before, The vector was an instant win gun.
Now it isn't so much.
Wouldn't mind it if the vector was powerful and you know... They increased the recoil so it doesn't beam from a range.
We're not sure.
-Yes
-Some people love it, some people dont
-No announcement so far
It's left up to speculation weather or not this will be scrapped.
You can say that about every other unannounced season for any other Battlepass game too though
Iām not sure wether to focus on playing with the bsv or dxr
Play with m5a3
Why focus? Just play them all, get some variety in there
God m5 with the extended barrel sounds beefy
Honestly I don't mind if they don't do year two and just skip straight to the next BF game. Because as much as I love 2042, I just love Battlefield in general...so either way it's a win-win for me
How about they supprot the game till the next bf drops
And a modern game shouldn't take 2 years to develop
Has anyone tried AK24 with High Power Long Barrel? It's pretty satisfying. Feels strong at long range while still having fair usability up close
coughs in ea
It fires slow enough that you might die up close when the opponent is one hit left
Very very slow rof
but it's worth it imo
lul what
at least 2
2 years is not enough
Games shouldn't actually take less than three in my opinion
that is not what it sounded like you said š
Three should be the minimum
If a game is four years or longer in development then it should be $70 and be fully featured
how much was cyberpunk again
I'm actually part of the group that sees the advent of $70 games as a good thing
It depends on how much you get for the $70 though
How long games take is kinda besides the point. If the game is amazing they can spend 1 week or 8 years for all the consumers should care. (as long as they treat the devs properly ofc.)
I think 30$
What I expect from $70 games is to basically match or exceed Red Dead Redemption 2 in terms of pure quality and enjoyment
That is not how it works. Movie tickets also cost the same but the movies don't need to all be masterpieces. It's art, expectations like that will get you nowhere.
wow didnt know it was $30
it was $60 lol
There's the argument of "art", and then there's the objective fact of quality
It also depends on the person on how they want to spend their money, be it on artistry or quality of enjoyment
For example, Prey is an amazing game artistically
sorry bro you're getting your hopes into heaven if you're expecting red dead redemption 2
It's on sale deco
that game was financed by microtransactions from 2 monolith titans of multiplayer
its a $100 quality game, not $70
it was a full price game at release
Any triple A studio can make a game that good
They all have the resources
yeah you dont know what you're talking about sorry
ah gotcha
I also feel like approaching games with the mindset of "I don't know what I'll get, I'm just going to take it as a piece of art" is, while a totally valid approach, not exactly the most frugal one
And I was arguing on the concept of frugality
On that basis my point stands that a $70 game should be RDR2-level
When we're talking about worth on an objective level
If you take the artistry argument, then subjective and personal values start to factor in
and those cannot be argued
your expectations are entirely flawed, RDR2 was financed on billions of sales of a multiplayer game that has been out for a decade, and rockstar are a studio, not even DICE have anywhere near the resources at their disposable as rockstar north lol
because everyone is entitled to their opinion
As I said earlier, any AAA studio can make a game as good as RDR2. You're right that they had the money to add an absolutely insane number of details to the game, but you don't need horse balls to make an insanely good game that is worth almost a hundred dollars disregarding special editions.
what? of course you do, why do you think it's $70 and not $100?
We're getting into personal opinion territory
IMO you don't need such minutia to have a good game

It may validate the price in a way, because of the added detail
no we're just getting into having unrealistic expectations with the title of "triple A"
not every game studio is a multi billion behemoth like rockstar
I didn't say they were.
But the ones on their level absolutely can do it.
-wooshes through the air stealthily-
like who lol
Well to call back on one of my earlier examples
no which studios have the same resources as rockstar north
Prey with Arkane Studios.
Arkane, despite having only a fraction of Rockstar's budget, made a game chock-full of details just like RDR2
whats the best m5 attatchments
I'm not talking about exact resources
I'm talking about capability
Resources act as a force multiplier
to capability
Arkane stuidos, medium resources very high capability = Prey
prey? that game had save file corruption bugs the week after it launched
Rockstar, high resources high capability = RDR2
it was a total ridden mess for literally a month
uncompletable missions things not rendering properly
I don't see your point. RDR2 still has issues to this day
Sometimes I get on and my pistol is replaced to the default Volcanic
and I have to manually switch it back
All games have bugs, my guy
What do you think about elden ring ?

the point is RDR2 doesn't have anywhere, near, those levels of issues whatsoever
so I ask you, again
what studio, has the same resources, as rockstar north
RDR2 absolutely did, and still does
I won't answer the question again because you aren't listening
and it's a pretty straightforward forward question because the answer is, no game studio has the same level lol
and you know that
elden ring bad game needs lower skill floor 
elden ring good game we just need to get better
people already calling it best game and goty
it's a good game but goty ehh idk
Which game do you think deserves goty ?
this year I mean

it's too early to tell, but I think mw2 will probably be in the running
based on what's been shown anyways
2042 is killing the Halo infinite player count, weird, I would think F2P games would have more
Imo its goty if there was a worst game of 2022 category
DL2 has better quality than elden ring I'd argue tbh most of the fun content were post-launch additions
is there a way to mamke underbarrel shotgun shoot faster
no it's limited
Today i learned what SFAR means = Small-Frame Autoloading Rifle
Soo MIIW and DL2 hmmmm
Nah it means stupid fucking assault rifle
wow...
man's woke up angry lmao
Swear words = angry
elden ring is a good game, but it's a game that doesn't appeal to everybody, and goty doesn't fit those types of categories
Nice thinking
as much as I appreciate the lore and universe thats built I'm also not oblivious to the fact that 30% of players quit at the beginning
Have you tried it too š³
I've completed it
wowwww
š
I'm actually afraid to use EBLC-RAM because I might get falsely banned. I've had so many people DMing me accusing of cheating bc they don't know how APS works.
from software aren't immune from criticism for elden ring I don't agree with many of their decisions to axe content just to turn them into a dlc
as much as the cult following has around it anyways
the blood ending is the clearest example
what's the pros and cons ?
wdym
š¤
whys this cvhat never about 2042
i used itā¦. iām not banned
I mean what is good and bad about er
it's bad in that it's a lazy way to bring about expansion content
I think the auto shotgun needs a good Ole nerf outta existence lol
there are a litany of things in the game that got removed that were clearly meant to be in the base game, mohg for example has an entire questline where the age of blood comes around
but it got axed and the fact it's half a story then just has 0 ending means they're going to turn it into a dlc
it's a pre emptive and to be quite frank lazy motivation to charging folk for content on what should be, a new story
whahst beter k30 or am40
you can fight mohg
What is mohg
and you shouldn't be able to, because it leads to nowhere
whahst beter k30 or am40
you don't come across him in the main questline
Mp9 with extended or drum mag
he's referenced in the lore but to actually fight him you need to do some story choices
but the tldr is you fight him, and that's it
it will be paid dlc right
because I think old dark souls game you pay for dlc
Still deco how much will you give it out of 10

8/8.5 probably
that's nice š

Should I buy the game
2042?
Ya
it's good so I don't see why not, look at some reviews of season 2 at least
Yeah at night. Im leaving home right now
š¤£

Fumizuki is low key my bff

Since December or January
You see what he said?
āI think they strayed away to what battlefield really isā they tried a couple of things that were to ambitiousā
āItās not inherently a bad idea," he continued. "The way they were set up and the way they executed just didnāt allow them to find the best thing possible.ā
As part of this Battlefield connected universe, EA announced an all new studio, which will be undertaking the task of creating a new campaign. Ridgeline Games, as it's called, will be headed up by Halo co-creator Marcus Lehto. Considering he created one of the most recognisable characters in video games, and some of the initial lore, Lehto could be just what EA needs to turn the tide.
"It is a great honor to have the opportunity to collaborate with DICE and Ripple Effect and lead the charge on expanding the narrative, storytelling, and character development opportunities in the Battlefield series," said Lehto. It's obviously going to be a while before we see even a hint of this new campaign, but it will be the start of this new Battlefield universe.
Anybody having persistent data error ????
I only worry that Vince will turn the next bf game into Titan Fall.
Tho i do like Titanfall
Titanfall do be slappin
Yeah but i just want an updated bf3/4 game
People say that all the time but I donāt think many of them actually know what that specifically entails
Not to rip on you personally but Iāve heard that so many times and I still donāt know what it means
Donāt get me wrong I like 2042 but I want the next bf to be better
Bf2042 had much potential. And still has. If dice won't fuck it up from now on it can pretty good game, but not as good as previous one's
It has lot of firepower
it's fucking insane
Ig
I mean it is a gunship
it just chases attack choppers down
I mean having Marcus lehto making the campaign that might be a huge W
Same as Condor
Itās a gun ship
Well it is a gunship
Yeah it's a gunship
Itās called a transport but functionally itās a gunship
it's fucking op
Itās really not
A rao and a couple AA launchers and itās fucked
it destroys air vehicles
Just like any other helo
Compared to how it was, itās nothing.
Ok great so does the fighter
Itās almost like skillful people do well with vehicles
So you just need to have good players
Everything in hands of good players will be OP
anyone that's flown helicopters competently will be able to get so many kills and points
If it was OP, anyone could just hop in and instantly demolish a map on their first try
Man itās almost like the game rewards skill and teamwork or something
Itās almost like the hind and condor rely entirely on gunners and pilots working together
game just got squad chat, no proximity chat, doesn't allow squad leaders or squad leaders to communicate together
but yea
we'll go with that
You donāt need to physically be able to talk to someone to work together, that can be done non verbally and is the very reason the hind is so powerful sometimes
really rewarding to have a "transport" vehicle that can annihilate any air vehicle, while also taking 6 rockets
Shit pilot? Youāll be shot down in no time. Shit gunners? Might as well be unarmed. You need a good mix of both
If the pilot and gunners aren't complete idiots than they can work together without even communicating
I HATE THE STUPID ATTACHMENT BUG.
so anyone with both their hands in tact

can basically dominate the skys
whats the best sniper to use?
Depends on the range youāre sniping from.
No they can't
Dudes about burst a blood vessel over the super hind
mid range, infantry
because it's so annoying to be flying an ATTACK vehicle
and this "transport" vehicle
I said i tried to fly it and i failed miserably
Also if it was weak health wise, people would see it as a free multi kill and not the actual threat itās supposed to be
Probably the NTW then. As it is a 1 shot kill within 100 meters.
bf4 is balanced good. the transport choppers are so freaking weak
It does not 2 shot you lmao
doesn't matter a ton tbh
The other team can also WORK TOGETHER to shoot it down with AA missiles
2 shots on an attack helicopter and it's basically done ofr
it's like getting with 2 missiles
If youāre getting shot down by that slow ass 50mm, thatās on you LMAO
if you're dying to the 50mm in air to air youre doing something wrong lmfao
Slow bolt speed and bullet travel time tho.
That thing is damn near useless nowadays
that's just hovering and letting it shoot you
either it needs to lose the 50mm, or it needs to lose half its health
Imagine getting called by 50mm
Damn imagine calling for ANOTHER 50mm nerf
some of yall obivously never flown before so lmao
Slowest projectile in history
sure
you'll be hovering for one second and then boom
because it's op? I cant get mad at something?
O I forgot
this is where the infantry plebs come to play their little violin
i feel like air units suck, never really have a problem with them.
Theyāre only a problem if people arenāt actively countering them
not true
i think i can count on one hand how many times ive been killed with the 50mm in air to air and most of those i wasnt in control of the aircraft lol
like you said, a good pilot will just alternate sides of the map
the new map for example
that huge ship is perfect for just hiding behind
ok
absolutely fucks everyone trying to shoot a rocket at it, because you can't run to the other side faster than he can get health + flares
it doesn't help it takes literally like 6 rockets to bring it down
"guys people can fly helicopters and use cover to their advantage
"
Sounds like you should just pilot the super hind.
From all games i played the only time when helicopters were harassing team was only when nobody was shooting or countering them
People need to realize that making a vehicle fall back is functionally the same as shooting it down
but it shouldn't be able to slaughter attack vehicles
lmao
not when you have 1-2 people repairign you
It has only 50mm which is slow af and 2 mini guns
it can't, unless the enemy pilot sucks
do you think bro]
A competent attack vehicle pilot wonāt let themselves get shot down by a transport
so 
youre joking
there is no way to 1v1
So it need to have more hp to survive
lmao
Bruh
It's not a vechcile you 1vs1
the condor is balanced af
It's like trying to 1vs1 a tank
Hmmmmmmm man itās almost like I mentioned that earlier or something
okay, the gunners have to be like literally borderline chimpanzess
like
iqs in the double digits to not hit an attack helicopter
Thatās more common than you give it credit for
mfw the transport helos are bulky, slow targets with limited manoeuvrability and a ton of blind space that a chimpanzee could take advantage of instead of waiting to get shot by the 50mm
yeah i get it
theres a lot of console players
500 ft from the screen
but idk everytime i encounter one
I just get absolutely fucked in the ass
and noone else has that issue š¤ i wonder what that might say
I'm not a bad pilot either, per se. I have the mastery skin on hokum, apache, little bird
you mean
you mean the small sliver of community that stuck around and still plays using the vehicles doesn't come in here and complain?
what



