#technology
1 messages · Page 269 of 1
No it isn't. Other people don't have the issue with the same cpu. If anything its bad optimization.
!!specs
ℹ Battlefield V: System Requirements:
Refer to this image to know more about the minimum and recommended system requirements in order to play Battlefield V
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/451791186642993152/509053395768705024/sys.png
Lmao god help us all....whatever dude
an i5 7600k isn't much better than a i5 6600k
Hm
Your shit resolution makes the cpu even more choked up
its not its single core performance that holds it back, its the fact that it only has 4 cores
True, 4C/8T is kind of the minimum for the newest games
Interesting. I dont think it being considered as "the most graphically intensive" is a good enough reason. Sounds like an excuse tbh.
I mean
you could be right
but bf1 is fine for example
It will run on quad cores, but with stuttering and framedrops
yes that game isnt as cpu intensive
bfv is a whole new level compared to bf1 for the system resources it requires
And why does it require that much
idk, ask dice
We arent devs, we cant answer that
yea i should be upgrading my pc soon so i can make my front room pc not have an i5 4570
4c4t is... not great
tbf when you look at other games, bfv is pretty impressive for the performance it gets
only way to knock bfv is to compare it to other bf titles
See people with i7s have issues too
no. no one debates that lol
Bs excuse still
bfv also is pretty well optimised GPU wise, it's just that it's really CPU intensive
idk any other games with 64 players on massive destructible maps with vehicles and top of the line graphics/sound
im not commenting on bfv running on certain hardware or not
just saying bfv is really impressive for what it does with the performance it gets
you get pubg that looks like shit and bfv gets more fps
pubg isn't the best example
But the thing is
It just has shit optimization (pubg)
ground wars was shit when i tried it
These guys are saying i need an i7 or a better cpu
But then explain how other people, even with high end cpus and not "ShIt" ones have the same issue?
im using a 4790 and i do just fine..
nothing you can do
@thick copper whats ur specs?
you can get a 3600, which is 175 bucks and be in a better spot
upgraded from gtx 970 to gtx 1660 super and i literally cant play the game rn
It will help to not play at a potato resolution
@marsh birch i5 6600 gtx 1660 super
idk where this "need i7" is coming from
yup
A 6600 is below minimum spec
!!specs
ℹ Battlefield V: System Requirements:
Refer to this image to know more about the minimum and recommended system requirements in order to play Battlefield V
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/451791186642993152/509053395768705024/sys.png
i played at 90 fps with my gtx 970 with the i5 6600
min says 6600k
now i cant even hit 80
Yeah
so technically its under
you have no idea do you
your not taking into account how damn realistic this game looks
but you can't avoid framedrops on a 4C4T, a lot of games will simply max it out
and how good the physics are
Not buying it.
well i dont know what to say dude
you are not reasonable then
Yes I cant avoid it
But this is a ridiculous impact and isnt justified enough
Whatever
there is 4 people here all saying the same thing, and your just being ignorant to all of them
Shame
Sad!
Guess Ill go back to bf4 or bf1 til they fix this shit
lol do it
welp. you spent 300 bucks on a 4c cpu, what can we say
what is your goal here? to reddit shit talk?
when you get get a 6c for 100
Lmao basically
to try to "one up" dice when you bought their product?
well the thing that i dont understand is that i was playing with my gtx 970 i5 6600 at low 70 fps capped and everything was fine
after upgrading gpu it got worse, cant handle stable 70 fps, drops to 50
with the same settings at low
only thing i can do is but back old gpu and enjoy playing
shit 1600 af is 85 bucks
or upgrading my cpu
which i cant
bcos my mobo support cpus only to 7 gen
or even 6
And no im not a reddit shit talker. Throwing around the UpGrAdE yOuR sPeCs all-in-one solution isnt always justified
thats why i am changing my mobo and cpu
Well youre playing on an old ass tv dude
@thick copper messed up
and a new mobo is basically rebuilding your whole PC
you just seem like you have a hate boner for dice
i5 6600 to Ryzen 5 3600 and z170a to b450
we arent telling you to upgrade, id bet if you played at 1080p your fps would go up
the only think i can think of
yes, try that
any Intel i5 made before the i5-8400 will get stutter in BFV due to only having 4 cores and 4 threads, this applies to the i5-7600k, 6600k, 4690K and so on
ye sux that it didnt occur with my gtx 970 at low
True, you should try 1080p at least, the bottleneck is still there, just less noticable
Who knows. I'll be back.
BFV can utilize 8 cores if it wants to
@thick copper ironically your new gpu is outrunning your cpu now. Try upping the gfx settings and/or rez
but 6 cores or 8 threads is needed for a smoother experience
@prime jasper wym gfx
The settings
oh
From low to med or high
i play at ultra
to get
more stable
with fps capped to 60
1080p
cant go higher than my monitor
rez
so that sux
whats dlss
sucks that Nvidia's features require DX12
Welp I cant seem to find a 1080p option
DX 12 makes performance shit
to 4,45ghz
@thick copper make sure you upgrade the drivers first too. Dlss is under the dx12 menu in game
You have a i5-7600K with a GTX 1080Ti, that is a pretty big CPU bottleneck, even if you were playing at 1440p
Did that help h0tkins?
dx12 gives me way more fps
@marsh birch a lot
Ok
inb4 the 6600 is a locked cpu 
is it a 6600 or 6600K
Dx 12 gives me framedrops sometimes, DX11 runs better for some reason for me (R5 3600, RX5700XT)
bclk
doesnt matter, its a locked cpu heheh
if you say so
i dont know what overclocking youve been doing ma man
yea i get drops on dx12, but its rare, quick and worth the +30 fps i get using it
🤷♂️
non K intel cpus dont OC
4790 is locked, 4790k is unlocked
only cpu's with a k or an x can overclock @thick copper
okay okay
The i5 6600 has a locked multiplier, but because of the way Skylake was engineered, you can increase the base clock, or BCLK, to get a pretty wicked OC. Your OC potential is huge, the 6600 should be able to push 4.3-4.5GHz before you start becoming unstable. @thick copper @supple bane
Thats weird
@supple bane
btw, the lower resolution you play at, the more your CPU bottlenecks
Yup
Okay
you need to enable it in the nvidia control panel @marsh birch
apparently OC base or BCLK is known to be unstable?
i forgot what the setting is called
Hmm ok
BCLK is pretty unstable
Lets see
@thick copper have you looked into getting a used 7700k? If you cant afford a new mobo that might be worth looking into
30 day refund policy on ebay
ebay not in my country unfortunately
Oof
Oh and one more thing, my tv has said that it goes up to 1080ix1920, not good but much better than 1360x768. Anyway, when connected to my pc it defaults to 1360x768. Any thoughts on why maybe?
do you have gpu drivers
Yeah i mean, just today i updated in geforce experience
@marsh birch its called DSR factors
whats this
I don't think he could've launched bfv with the basic display drivers from windows
if you enable all of those, in game you will be able to select things that are pretty close to higher resolutions
For the game or for the res of the whole tv?
just for the game
you have to set the resolution in windows and nvidias panel
you cant change that
If you just installed the drivers you need to reboot after
if tv is 1080i it will do it
Either way ill try the thing u recommended
@thick copper my bad, you can still play on dx12 and see what happens though
You can try, doesnt hurt
Yeah so select 1080
for the price of a used i7-7700K, you can get a new Ryzen 5 1600AF and B450 motherboard lmao
Highest one?
It think turning future frame rendering off, might help the CPU, not sure though
Yes
@latent light it would cost even less to take shears to that mullet
Ahh but that makes the hz go down to 30 :( maybe i see now why it defaulted to that particular res
Try 1080p
@marsh birch do you play on ultra?
get a MSI B450 MAX motherboard, they are guaranteed to work with Ryzen 3000 and also have a larger BIOS chip for better support in the future
Boo
it may not have the BIOS flashed for Ryzen 3000
The other option thats 60 is 720p, 1280 x 728. Which is lower than what I got now
which would mean you'd have to wait 1 week for AMD to ship you a compatible CPU to update the BIOS yourself
Fuck that tv sucks lol
It needs to be Zen 2 compatible, some might not have an updated BIOS
isnt tomahawk max the go to right now?
comes biosed flashed for sure and one of the more compatible ram mbs out there
Tomahawk MAX is a bit expensive for B450, you can get another MAX board for $30 less
@supple bane All of them enabled?
@latent light i want to give the pc to computer service and they will do it
but if you're already thinking about getting the Pro Carbon, the Tomahawk MAX is cheaper than that one
i think they do have other cpus
isnt tomahawk max normally 110?
yeah
unless youre going micro i doubt youll get much cheaper
Something like that, I think I payed 100eur for mine @storm osprey
@thick copper Ryzen 5 3600 and B450 Tomahawk MAX are a great combo
110€
Nop.. still not able to try it at 1080p
problem with B450/X470 motherboards without 'MAX' is they have a smaller BIOS chip which means updating them to Ryzen 3000 compatibility means you lose some BIOS features
thought carbon is better @latent light
Left is a Ryzen 3000 B450 board updated to Ryzen 3000, it lost some BIOS features and the nice appearances, right one is a MAX board
Tldw, but config tweaks wont fix your reZ
if you update the Pro Carbon to Ryzen 3000 BIOS, you get the left BIOS
@marsh birch if you lower your in game setting you put more work into your cpu
that means even more bottleneck
well that sux
i want the right one
Okay..
yeah, lower resolution and graphics settings means the GPU is working less and the CPU is working more
But my graphics are ulta
perfect situation is if cpu works less and gpu is stressed
i5-7600K won't ever experience smooth gameplay in BFV, especially on large maps with 64 players
you'll always get some stutter
@latent light i played normally without stutters on my gtx 970
tf you got such high settings
so the cpu wasnt the problem
Doesnt that make it worse?
playing any mp game with ultra settings is asking to be put at a disadvantage
and lock fps to 60
Not really. BF4 and 1 work beautifully.
it works for me for the time being
its not ONLY about fps, but low settings are better for visibility too
Fps goes even lower if its locked at 60
damn
not to mention latency
Yeah
The only thing left to try is upscaling the resolution in game with the scaler
i got okay bcus of my cpu overclock
if i do that
If you can't do it any other way
everything looks beyond bad lol
@thick copper Did u oc ur cpu?
Maybe i should oc mine
ye
not sure if it will make ad ifference tho
whats your mobo and cpu
you have unlocked cpu?
yes
and you didnt oc it?
I didnt want to until i felt like i had to
It was only a little more expensive when i saw it vs the none-k
So i got it
But I aint got watercooling or anything fancy lol
just evo 212x
currently @ 3.8ghz
as long as it isn't the stock cooler some OC should be possible
its basically a slighter better evo 212
why
bcus it does not let me
??
it says 100c
lol
cuz i oced BCLK
whats bclk
base
should be able to do at least 4.5 GHz with 7600K with that cooler
raising the base clock
hows it different from normal oc'ing?
base clock * multiplier
@latent light For real?
yes
i cant change the multiplier but i can base clock
@marsh birch try 4.5 GHz at 1.30v
alright
grim what about mine
Thing is i've been planning to get a 2k monitor
don't use base clock overclocking, only do the multiplier
So maybe i dont need to?
can't be certain that's gonna be stable
ill ttyl. thanks for giving advice guys
don't go over 1.35v with 7600K, that's unsafe without watercooling
1.30v should be good
@marsh birch i did the same lel
4.5 GHz should be doable on all 7600K
slowly try going up
I mean you should be able to do 4.5GHz with 1.30v right off the bat
i'll test a bit later on
itll do fine imo
thanks
already did
the best stress test would be Prime95
CORES=4
THREADS=4
MHZ=3320.000000
PROCESSOR=Intel Core i5-6600 CPU
CBTYPE=64 Bit
OSVERSION=Windows 10, 64 Bit, Professional Edition (build 18362)
CBCPU1=0.000000
CBCPUX=1251.618102
C4DINFO=
C4DVERSION=20.060
C4DBUILDID=RBBenchmark281795
i did another in cinebench r15
result is 690-710
@latent light
so how do i know if its stable?
@thick copper Prime95 is the best utility to check for stable CPU
Crashing and bluescreening for my R5 3600, but don't know if that's always the case (when under heavy load)
i dont get any crash or bluescreens
Like grim said, if it completes multiple stress tests without any issues it's most likely stable
cant launch prime95
cinebench r20 will have to do
what about temps
i cant monitor them
how do i know if its not overheating
its reaching max 53C
Looks fine
This is a nice looking laptop
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SfSUjxNHtE
Dave2D review of the 2020 XPS 13 (9300). With one of the best keyboards in the market, this is a vastly improved laptop from even the 2019 model.
Laptop Skins - https://www.dbrand.com
If you want to support the channel, consider a Dave2D membership by clicking the “Join” butt...
Love the 16:10 screen
Hope they will do a 16:10 screen on the Dell XPS 15 as well
is prime really the best thing? i thought that was a more unrealistic "high stress" scenario or something to that effect
dayumm
boii
its so sexy
love the screen look
k nevermind
just saw the price

They were never budget laptops lmao
Is its popular in europoorland to recycle decade old reddit memes for pfps?
I mean it's better than being a dick on discord while talking with some lame quarantine pfp.



Better
oi oi @molten coral
But you can get infected through your eyes
we talked about my pc only yesterday
today was about errol's
and my cpu oc
thats it
was tryin to help out errol and then it got to my pc

not my fault
taking anything nacho says seriously at all

But tbh, I've nothing against you but this chat is sometimes just a bit lame talking about the same thing every day
Nacho is the only mod who is either brave enough or brain damaged enough to get in here, so rest assured hotkins youre safe
Can I ban myself? mhh
pls do so
If you make me mod Ill do my best
If that doesnt work I'll just spam modmail with fake complaints about you
Im calling the internet police
wait thats illegal
Not anymore, its the wild west in here
Talking of wild west
My rig can't afford to pay red dead redemption 2 at 60 fps stable
Play
At medium
Rdr2 is brutally intensive
I hardly get 60 on high/ultra with an rtx 2080
Often drops to 45 but gsync keeps it smooth
Hi guys
I'm thinking of bumping my resolution scale really high up to fix my stutter issues
It might help because it would alleviate pressure on the CPU
Likely not the issue
But I mean
I understand what you guys are saying
it makes sense
But then on the other hand you have guys with the same issue, playing in high resolutions with much better cpus
So it doesnt add up
Pretty much a majority of the people here
everytime i play bf4
punkbuster kicks me everyday )
after like 2 minutes of playing
i know i know im a hacker
Fuck yeah
i fixed it
just re repair game
and reinstall punkbuster
stupid dice told me to go contact punkbuster support so stupid
I had that issue before and it was the gamespy replacement I was using to play BF2142 in 2019, punkbuster was not working
so maybe its some third party software on your PC
@latent light Maybe it could be something else?
hello
what is it ?
Fixed a crash that could occur when using the Russian language.
Fixed a crash that could occur if the player played the game for more than 5 hours in one go.
Will they finally fix crashes from the game to the desktop?
Patch comes out tomorrow
Nice
Who know how to fix unlock issue?
check the pins in #battlefield-legacy-titles for a possible fix @analog torrent
Useless,next round still unlocked
@prime jasperany other ways?
not that I know
anyone can help me in a bug?
with camera
@prime jasper
my camera with touchpad or mouse
goes anywhere randomly
i tried re plugging the mouse
and restarting the game
🤷♂️
Not sure what that means, what “camera” are you even referring to? And please don’t ping staff unless they’re in a conversation with you.
@molten bramble spinning camera
@uneven pine Don’t know what that is, don’t think I’ll be able to help.
common
i just installed bf 3
i can send ss or link of what i mean
@molten bramble
Where is ZenWeasel?
Did he leave the server?
@supple bane do you know where he went?
i dont even see him in my chat logs
Rip account
@storm osprey Same, he completely disappeared
hopefully hes alright
case solved
That explains a lot
so my front room pc is gonna have a better gpu than my main gaming pc
and idk how i feel about that
Time to swap names?
@storm osprey what you getting ?
and just put said better gpu in your main pc and your old main pc gpu in your front room one
5700
front room tv uses freesync, hence 5700
my main pc using gsync, and thats a 1080
They're really close performance wise
Hello guys
I think I will try OCing to fix stutter problems in bfv
to 4.5ghz
Thoughts?
on your 4c4t cpu?
Yes
i mean... its gonna help but i really doubt its gonna be a solution
i didnt know hyperthread was equal to 25% of an actual thread
But I still cant deny the fact that its not entirely bad optimization
i thought it was 20% at best
with a 7700k for expample on 4.8ghz you still get micro stutters,not much but they are there
Oy vey
frostbite engine is wack
That.. shouldnt happen
Ryzen 5 3400G gets 50% better multicore performance than the 3200G, and they have the same core count, only difference is multithreading
as nyph wrote,6 cores min for stutter free exp on bfv
hm
Ryzen appears to benefit more from multithreading than Intel
simple bottleneck situation
Guess its my first
when i played on a 7700k the cpu load was always around 95-100%,on a 3700x for example the load get's to 25% tops
it is
AMD ftw
maybe an intel problem
(totally not for showing off stats)
sorry where do you see load
3700X will stay between 20-60% load in BFV
never seen it go above 30
yeah 4c and bfv sucks
Just for fun tho
specially on intel it seems
yeah
8cores
8c8t
damn son
Sad that 6 is "enough"
or was it 2700,can't recall atm
Just for fun tho, I'd like to test another cpu intensive game
And see what results i get
vs bfv
well,more and more games gonna need more than 4 cores to run really smooth
okay
like.. play a different game thats "cpu intensive" and compare fps?
Roughly
i mean, thats not even close to apples to apples since bfv is such a technically advanced game
frostbite engine is badly optimized for pc
^
try metro 2033,should heat up your cpu to 100% as well
That's where I begin to lose faith
its not a faith thing though
even if frostbite is worse on pc compared to console, you still get massive destructible maps with 64 players and top of the line graphics and good fps...
like, yea you dont get the same FPS as apex legends, but apex legends is a waaay more simpler game than bfv
one thing that could help you out a bit would be a user.cfg
only way you can shit talk bfvs optimization is looking at other bf titles honestly
Simpler in what sense, though. Does destruction really justify such a detrimental impact on FPS and usage of CPU? I don't think it's justified enough. I agree that 4c is what is causing the issue, I get it, but when you have people with 8th gen i7's facing the issue, I can't help but to think that optimization plays a large part.
Well yeah
BF4 (which is considered ancient in PC gaming) and BF1 run like butter compared to it
BF1 is more intensive than 4 obviously
But yeah those cant be compared
bf just performs better on amd
destruction is only 1 aspect of what makes bfv a technical marvel of a game
intel cpu's have huge security holes which have to be patched by micro code loading with the bios and windows itself,that eats loads of performance
massive maps with 64 players at all times, vehicles, probably some of the best graphics out there outside of a few titles
and i mean a very few titles
and the intel management engine is total wack
Massive maps and 64 players isn't a new thing. The graphics, sure, but that's beginning to be more in relation to gpu usage. Btw for me my gpu is at 10%.
google bfv user.cfg try some high fps ones,might help you with your stutters a bit
its not new, but again you have to look at other bf titles to compain about bfv
cod mw groundwars is the only title that really competes with bfv
I realize that 4C is a big part of the issue but not the entirety of it
@violet plank Whats that?
and i only played it during beta, but fps was the same, even though it does less
Hmm
but with lower visuals ofc
Is it safe?
yes
Let me try lowering my visuals myself real quick, haven't gone lower than high
i can upload it if you like,but dunno if it works for you like it does for me
alright
menu colors are dark with it tho,but i don't care about that,ig performance counts
oh,and you got to set motion blur to 1% in the menu for it to work correctly
I have to figure out how to install this
if yo don't like it just rename it to user.bak and it's disabled again
just copy it into your bfv main folder
where the bfv.exe is
just restart
all my settings are still showing the same
else it's too dark for me
the user.cfg overwrites most of your menu settings
yep
most of the settings are console settings
so its normal to see the settings as the same?
not visible in your normal menu
ok
it should give you at least a fps boost
like 20-30%
i'm playing with lowest graphical settings possible,only mesh on ultra,1440p on 144hz monitor,with that config i get 144 fps
well,141 you usually set -3 fps from your max refresh rate of your monitor
hi, does it happen that battlefield 5 crashes to the desktop without errors? I'm already tired of looking for how to solve this problem (
reason is that gsync/freesync does not switch
ah lol
hi, does it happen that battlefield 5 crashes to the desktop without errors? I'm already tired of looking for how to solve this problem (
might not help on a tv i guess
limited to 60fps anyways
try some games with the config,maybe stutters are a bit less
trying rn
@fair stratus yes,happens,dunno a solution either
one thing that can force bf to crash is if you have overclocked cpu/ram/gpu
@fair stratus yes,happens,dunno a solution either
@violet plank like tomorrow should fix in a patch
uhh
@marsh birch nothing is overclocked, only the xmp ram profile is on
think he meant me
Well
xmp is fine btw
Now i just see green water
weird
if i should set Thread.MaxProcessorCount to 4?
should not happen with nvidia
1080ti btw
I already changed, the processor, motherboard, RAM, power supply, operating system, and the game all flies out smoothly periodically once a month
i played gtx1660ti
guess you need to play around with the settings (if you want to),dunno a general solution of your rig and the user.cfg,it's always personal tweaking
else delete it,or rename it to user.bak to set it inactive
dunno if it's possible,cpu bottlenecks your gpu,always
you got dual channel ram?
btw i'm playing with a 1080ti as well
yeah 2x is dual,that's fine
@violet plank also u know the notepad settings?
which ones?
like the one u sent
I opened it and wanna put other stuff in it
but is author and email, discord, etc... supposed to be up there?
wont it like mess with the code?
maybe you know and the developers did not answer anything about crashes to the desktop?
yeah
i don't see anything like that
im trying a new thing
i deleted all personal infos before uploading
the top thing shud be //Counter/Max FPS right?
or written ####
aight aight
//BFV user.cfg
//Created by: ######
//Contributors: ######
that's the tip
top
do you use riva tuner ?
Oh
Nah
I just opened it on notepad
and now the icon is notepad, dk if that bad lol
Also does it matter if i just delete that stuff from the top?
make sure you set on the nvidia control center gsync to ON / vsync ON and ingame vsync to OFF
you can delete anything that begins with \
err //
// won't affect the config anyways,that's just info stuff
with that you can also exclude stuff
why vsync ON and ingame vsync to OFF?
but what if it affects other games too, that are fine?
also isnt gsync only for monitors that support it? I got a crappy tv lol
just do it for bfv,not global settings
ah crap,forgot lol
my bad
it's just lot's of ppl set it wrong with gsync monitors
np
let see..
@violet plank Just wanna make sure this is the right thing, rn vsync is on "Use 3d app setting" but i set it to on right?
if you want higher fps set that to off
My max is 60
vsync locks your fps to your monitors refresh rate
with this crappy tv
im trynna use cfg settings
and isuni jus recommended that i turn vsync in the panel on, but off in the actual game
nvcp wont give you any real fps btw. maybe 5 fps at most.
that's if you have a gsync monitor
try it yeah
the cfg does not mess with those settings around
just visuals to gain higher fps
i'm playing myself rn,might not see everything here
aight
@violet plank I can confirm its not the graphics thats causing the issue. I set it to medium and it was even worse.
At first it was good
But i'll see and try other cfg's ig
Mebe im doing something wrong
is it still your fps your having trouble with ?
set the fps from 200 to 60
and i guess the problem is your tv
well not that it is bad,tv's just handle inputs different than monitors
guys
question
is 77 degress celsius under heeeavy load
okay
for GPU?
gtx 1660 super
sounds a bit warm, but most gpus are safe up to 90-100
of course i would just google 1660 super safe temps to find out
cant wait to see the temps i get with a 5700
Mine is almost 70 at around 50%, but the fans are barely spinning now
My RX5700XT reaches 70-80 under full load, so your should be slightly below that (if it isn't a reference card)
Under 90 should be safe, I think the limit is around 95
idle is 49
It will thermal throttle by itself once it hits 85 afaik
89C if you set it to in afterburner
77 is fine, just slightly weak for a 1660 super cooler
As 1660 super doesn't use that much power
should i use custom msi curve fan speed?
because this card is "brand new"
out of the box
and that temps scares me
@storm osprey I have the Gigabyte Gaming OC, so it's a triple fan card. I wouldn't expect anything above 80 on the MSI card, probably around 70 under full load (especially since my XT uses more power, so it runs hotter). They're used to be some issues with MSI RX5700s (memory thermal pads) ,but they are solved as far as I know.
The temp is fine
It doesn't endanger the card
You can use custom fan curve and increase the fan speed it noise isn't as much of a bother to you
nah i have headphones so i cant hear it
@west willow yea i read on that, but from what i gathered it was mostly bad with 5700xt
hopefully mine is good, thats why i was saying ill have to check it
It's easy to keep an eye on your temps with the radeon overlay, so if there are issues it won't take long to notice
It's normal for cards with a higher power draw
I know but still
@thick copper what brand card?
i always set my fan at 100% for 75C
I don't let my fan get above 60% because it gets too loud
Only ran it at 80% fan speed. Haven't tried anything above 80% because fear of PC going into takeoff. Perhaps a new competitor to the F-22 Raptor?
damn
that is some next level
future gen
jet engine
i get 70C peak
with 100% fans
at bfv
but its still unplayable at 60 locked fps bcuz of this cpu
dang it
only thing i can play is rainbow six siege :c
i get there 130fps at ultra
Financial Analyst Day tomorrow, AMD could announce Ryzen 4000 and new Navi products

hard to beat the 3600 when it's only $175
Is there any Intel CPU at ryzen 5 3600 performance for the same price?
no lol
3600 competes against the i7 8700...
even though the 8700 wins, its probably its closest competition
closest would be the i5-9600K but that's $50 more and it lacks hyperthreading
Jeez
would be cheaper/better to get a 3600 and mb...
Yes
That's what I'm gonna do
And 100 euro in my pocket
For some games
Or a better monitor
What about fans
I have 2 in front and 1 back
Should/can I add more
?
nah 3 is good
i think 2 minimum, 3 is optimal
adding fans beyond that reduces temps by 1 degree per fan maaaaybe
the only major benefit to adding more fans would be noise reduction, but thats another can of worms
100 euro wont get you much in terms of a monitor
but i guess that depends on what you already have

