#technology
1 messages ยท Page 213 of 1
What's your cpu also
Basically overall you'll want to lower settings to minimum and there's that latency setting that gives much better performance for very slightly more latency
has anyone an idea why my 2070 is @ around 30% load while my i78700k @ around 80 is?
and then i had only 20fps while the harware wasnt @ 100% load at all...
Hey, i cant run BFV smoothly, i have i57400, gtx 1070 and 8 gb of ram, keeps dipping when i the heat of the moment and when in enter towns etc. Can run SWBF2 fine and BF1 also ok
does anyone know whats wrong?
playing on low at this point
Snutten could we talk about the settings? easier than writing
ah allright
would futur frame rendering fix some of the problems i had?
so it actualy improves ur fps?
also why cant u enable dlss?
ok
np
thanks anyways
im looking at the article right now. where or what is the nvidia controll panel?
@plain vessel future fram rendering? im not such a tech man oops
but i should be able to run it right?
i have two monitors. one @ 60 hz, th eother @ 75. what should i set the limit in bf5 to?
ok
so 75
aabout to try it
why do they recomend setting the fps limit in the advanced tab to 200?
huh? I dont think thats the recommended anything you can set it how you want it
@plain vessel i did what the article said, some thing go to ultra, still stutters but more like when i start movement
DX? sorry idk what that is
dx11 or dx12
where do i see?
uhm i bfv you mean? because i dont see anything called dx
oh wait
it says
DX12 disabled?
ok
you also might be running out of RAM, do you have a second monitor you can open task manager on?
no i dont, think the ram might be the issue do
where is the hardware-acceleration in the discord settingd?
but recommended is 8 gb and i have that
8gb is minimum, not recommended
8gb does not gaurentee anything smooth
fair
12 is recommended
@plain vessel with dx12 on i run about 59/76 fps but it goes up and down, can i get this stabilized?
uh
on the hamada map its around 80 then, buyt on the riverside artillery(twisted steel) its around 67, with dx 12 on, but stutters less @plain vessel
i ment off for the last one so fine ill use it, thanks for the help
Play on the lowest settings to see mans better
why do they recommend turning vsync off?
cause if its off i get these terrible screen-tearing problems
thats what vsync helps to fix if you dont have adaptive syncing
but why do many ppl say its a bad thing in games?
if you have gsync/freesync you need to turn it off ig anyways
last patch,yes
is your ram 2x4 or 1x8?
i have gtx 1070 i know ultra is 70-50 but i m on high and its 50-60 and have so many fps drop to 40-20
can i fix it/
what cpu do you have?
BFV is everything based 
task manager
in the top right
left in my task manager is cpu 20%
how do i make it up
ohh
ok
i see
what to do now
@supple bane ?
what cpu is it ?
intel core i7
and the rest ?
3.60GHZ

6850K ? xd
ye you should be seeing way better performance than that
so there is nothing i can do
try the other dx
..
yes
change that to the other one from the one you are using
so if its on dx 11 try dx 12 and vise versa
the dx12 is off all of them off but the high dynamic range is auto should i do it off?
no just leave that
and gpu memory off ?
then turn it on
ok i did m now restarting the game
how did you know what the fps was in the first place then ?
Fraps
" i have gtx 1070 i know ultra is 70-50 but i m on high and its 50-60 and have so many fps drop to 40-20 "
m8 if you knew how to see the fps then, you know now
but its show with frpas and fraps dosent show fps right now and idk why
turn vsync off and turn your fps cap to 200
fps cap is in advence> or basic
try ffr to get more fps
ffr?
future frame rendering
ohh
its alays on
mybe - Gametime.MaxVariableFps ### on advenec to set it on maximum fps limit?
try turning it off and see what happens
bad ssd
define bad
how?
not everyone needs mlc/slc lol
whats a better performing NVME for about 100$/1TB?
It has shit latency
even if it is the worst performing for its price (cant imagine theres much at this price point) its still good enough for a vast majority of people
low-end Intel SSDs are garbage anyway
and "worse" by how much?
Its about the level of a SATA 3 drive in sustained loads IIRC
and its about 1/3 - 1/2 the speed of a proper NVMe drive
The HP EX920 is a great performing NVMe drive and its like $15 more
Visit https://www.squarespace.com/LTT and use offer code LTT for 10% off Pick up PC Building Simulator for only $15 USD TODAY ONLY at https://www.chrono.gg/l...
the 660p is garbage
I would rather use a HDD
cant find anything on load times, but i would bet they arent very far off from eachother, if at all
not bad
Latency is garbage
considering ive found samsung 960 or 970 evos barely load faster than a mx500
I like the new WD Black SN750
does that thing work as a cache?
yeah how does it do that
You put it in your system
and then you do the software side to enable it and select what drive you want to cache
Then launch whatever game a few times, repeat, and it should load faster
doesnt care about consumer reviews on failed drives, but cares about a smaller sample pool
Because I definitely want to review a dozen reviews of "it works" or "it died" with no more to it
read... "consumer reviews on failed drives", if you want more information you obviously go elsewhere, if you want to see at least an indication of fail rate consumer reviews are your best bet, and if it fails, it fails, tf more do you need to know?
you think people that will just say "it died" dont have the know how to say how they were running it?
also, at 140 bucks with ram, the 660p is probably priced around 80 bucks in that combo, 40 bucks cheaper than the hp ssd you linked, or 2/3 the price
CPU? RAM?
watched the video, so the 660p sucks at large file transfers, for something like gaming, performs just the same as any other ssd
linked above by grim, video posted by ltt
Then why not buy a SATA SSD for way less 
looking at pcpartpicker theres only a few off brand ssds that are around 80 bucks for 1tb
@random flax what resolution are you even playing at?
resolution changes what you are stressing hardware wise
uh...whats your monitors native resolution lol
general rule of thumb is the higher the resolution the more gpu dependent, the lower the resolution the more cpu dependent
wtf monitor are you playing on?
a TV set?
yeah
yeah thats not gonna be good
720p is extremely cpu bound anyway
how can i up my frames in bfv cuz im stuck at 60 and in actual combat areas it goes down to like 50-40
i got my settings in medium
disable vsync
are you averaging 60 fps or does it never go above 60 fps?
its mainly on 60
in heavily densed areas or combat areas
or when theres alot of stuff on screen
it goes down
like the C flag on panzerstorm
with all the bushes and stuff
the fps drop is happening since yesterday :/
its most likely just bf
its sad to say any performance problems can 90% be solved by saying "its bfv"
Hoping doing a fresh start on Windows 10 allows the internet to fucking work now.
yeet
1050ti is pretty weak, but i have a friend who has that and PLAYED bfv on low settings with at least 60 fps
yea
but that was months ago
on high/medium i got 60
back when performance was easily better
Play on low
bruh
It's better for seeing people anyways
Less visual clutter
Pretty much
that needs changing in there
If you use a preset you have to disable vsync, etc again
turn everything low/off
the only thing i have above low/off is textures, which i put on ultra
lemme test the frame rate in the firing range
i know its not ideal comp settings, but i like nicer textures
fuck sake i wish there was a benchmark thing in game
k im getting around 80-90 fps now
idk how it is in an actual server
but ill see later
I am always with 80 fps low 1050ti gpu
But since yesterday its dropping to 40-50 then goes back to 75
lol performance on this game could get worse ?
with 1050ti you wont even reach 60fps while staring at the floor, all the forced options made sure of that.
check dms
that is only a thing if you are on a laptop btw
im not on laptop
well you can unpark a cpu then
what is a thing on laptops?
unparking
its useless tho
do you know what unparking is ?
yes
yes, it occurs when the laptop goes into power saving mode, and can also be manually activated to save power
a desktop wont disable cores for a powersaving mode
because said mode doesnt exist
its about energy efficiency
yes but a cpu has all cores open by defult
so unless he has changed something
he wont need to unpark it
Question
I play on Xbox 1 and have bf 3
And my friend plays on 360
But I can't inv him to games or matches
no crossplay like that
#giveaways is where mostly mods give away stuff, just react with ๐
right now the giveaway is an emblem for bfv
i just got a free trial for dolby access
i honestly cant tell the difference
i dont know how this is like 14 pound a month or what ever
seems useless
tf is dolby access?
idk, its on the microsoft store
i saw an advert for it and i was interested to see if it made a difference
i might just be deaf tho haha
you try it and see what you think if you have some spare time, i would be interested to see if you can hear a difference
maybe it makes more difference on a higher end pair of headphones
assuming there is a difference youd need you audio line to be able to tell the difference
from dac, possible amp, and headphones to the source of audio
shit even windows settings if your audio player doesnt bypass it
the only difference i have heard is when someone is speaking and there is no background music, it kinda sounds like you are in a room.
i dont mean an echo..
its weird hahah
just sounds like a more natural area of space instead of two speakers by your ears
audio is hard to tell even with good gear
you really gotta train yourself to hear a difference
imo, you have to do a true A/B test with someone changing it on you so you dont know which is which
this is why i call bs on most audiophiles
and like, what does the hz do ?
because like i have it on max rn and it sounds different, but there must be a negative to doing that right?
its supposed to be the frequency range and quality iirc, the problem is that a lot of audio is recorded/compressed at various levels
so is it best to have it on the max?
so even if your pc IS outputting a full range of audio, the source (like youtube) wont give you that range
uhh, this was a real gray zone in the research i did
!support
!support
nyphon
XD help
certain things would be nice, they just worry about spam
so i have the most recommended budget/low/midfi set up with a schiit stack and hd 6xx headphones
hd 6xx?\
and thats the quality setting i found most people said to use
they are sennheiser right ?
sennheiser hd 6xx
massdrop version of the hd 650
just a different color
these are probably the most recommended pair of audiophile headphones
wayyyy too expensive for me hahah
i would rather spend that money on a gpu than have good audio
thankfully i can have both
anyway, i think i like those razer bitches with insane base
bleh
i tried them out not too long ago and i kinda liked them
you can disable it im pretty sure
i swear there was something super simple on the headphones you could do to temporarily disable it
you can EQ any headphone, that just opens another can of worms though
extreme bass is garbage
imo if you want a gaming/general pair of headphones get the dt 770s iirc
i have headphones for gaming (ad 700x) and headphones for music (hd 6xx)
!support
@analog zenith english only
and no adverts
and twitch links go #streams-and-videos
anyway
was i was half way through typing...
for music i have a sound bar and a dedicated sub-woofer
usually
they are hidden in my desk
that sounds cool, i listen to music at work so need headphones
but they are a pain to setup and turn on so most the time i dont bother
the sound bar is super cheap. and i did that on purpose as it does still sound nice, but it has no base at all
and thats where the subwoofer comes in
yea for speakers i got a simple stereo and sub set up
what about mic ? what do you use ?
modmic 4
i only use disc, so as long as my mic isnt shit i could care less how good it sounds
if i was to stream or podcast or something like that then i would worry about a better mic set up
i use something called the fifine k669
and it is one of the best purchases i have ever made
i forget which fifine i recommend, i think its that one
im not paying another 4 pound for a black paint job 
maybe it is the k669
and i use a cheapo mic arm
whatever gets the job done
and a pop filter which i forgot the brand of
fair
there is one thing i dont like about the k669
its cable is relatively short
it said it came with a 6 foot cable
but i am sceptical about that
easy to extend that at least
i have found a perfect position where the cable is just long enough and its hidden, but thats at the cost of the mic being at an awkward place when i am using it
instead the mic being infront of my mouth, its like on the left side of my face
yea that would bother me lol
I mean it still works and sounds just as good so Iโm fine with it
I also am not breathing into it which is a plus
is there no 5800 or something?
not as of right now
the 5700 XT is supposedly the best mid-range card
and there will be high end cards next year
BFV really loves AMD cards
the 22% increased performance over the 2070 in BFV is likely
I wonder if thats about on par with a 2080 then
!support
:information_source: Contacting Battlefield Support
If you need to contact the Battlefield Support team for questions you might have, crashing in game and or server issues head over to
https://help.ea.com/en/battlefield/battlefield-v/
Contacting EA Support
If you need to contact EA support about account issues, billing issues etc head over to
https://help.ea.com/en/
If you need help in this Discord server you can send a Direct Message to our @woeful crater bot!
@random flax computer specs
what configuration is your ram
like what slots do you have the ram plugged into
you have a Broadwell-E motherboard so there should be 2 sticks on each side and they have to be in the specific slots
6850k is broadwell-e not haswell smh
Its X99 so its a joke anyways
tbh I'm about to start pointing people to CPU-Z to figure out their memory config
the only way your build could only get 50-60 fps tops is having the ram in the wrong slots
or your CPU is running at 2 GHz

3.60
or he is at 4k?
nope
maybe
but tv screen
I mean he hasn't mentioned monitor, settings, or a bunch of other shit
1080p TV?
yes

.
oof
!jumbo 
what cooler are you using on the i7-6850K?
@supple bane was only getting 60 fps yesterday then he showed me that he had the RAM in the wrong slots on his Ryzen build and I told him to use the 2nd and 4th slot and his fps shot up to 130

Should say quad channel
Difference between dual and quad in gaming is small, but its not a great CPU
yeah CPU-Z will work
U think a rx580 8gb paired with a r5 2600 and 8gb 3000mhz ram will run bfv well?
DXR is ray tracing
I've got a Ryzen 5 1600 and RX 580, runs at 80 fps on everything ultra @marsh crest
over 140 fps with everything low
@steep gust 50 gb
@latent light ah oo thx
left
I have 8gb ram tho
low master race
8GB single or dual channel
@latent light so should i enbaled it to get more fps or not?
Dual
is it gonna effect the gameplay?
ok good
DXR is for RTX cards, not GTX
Ppl are saying bfv is rly buggy
@random flax I hope your ram is running in dual channel at least
X99 has a really bad IMC
So depending on his XMP settings, its not gonna work without tweaking it
1st gen Ryzen pretty much murdered Broadwell-E
found @winged tapir new pc https://pcpartpicker.com/list/jc2XKB wich @silk echo is said to buy what do you guys think. money is no issus
get a better SSD
we are spending
$420 on a motherboard, only $80 on a SSD
why only intel though 
cost more
because fanboyism
you just such a big baby ๐
Cost =/= better
smart shoppers do things differently than someone defiantly refusing to look beyond a weirdly obstinate purview

Imagine wanting to waste someone's money
just for the shits and giggles of wasting someone's money
this is why we need COMMUNISM 
tbh worst thing about that build is the ADATA SSD
and that NZXT case
or you can literally wait a month and Intel will most likely drop prices of the 9900k
Why buy a Formula board to not do a custom loop 
tbh at this point I don't even care what people waste their money on
You want to waste money not being an informed buyer? Go ahead, you want to waste someone else's money by selling them inferior products? That is on you.
at $4000 you shouldn't even have an HDD unless you need mass storage
like a 6TB HDD
or more
AMD E3 keynote in a few minutes
release the gpus!!
define "few minutes'
definitely not a few minutes...
Join AMD President and CEO Dr. Lisa Su as she unveils details about upcoming products and innovations that will shape the future of gaming.
here it goes
only took a few minutes...

"breakthrough games" shows Division 2
that streaming sample
12 cores vs 8 cores
that game comparison is pretty honest though
imagine talking about 360 no scoping people in csgo...


that blower fan
so that leak was correct about the RX 5700 XT
ah it's a blower fan and a vapor chamber heatsink

RX 5700 is juicy
Any suggestion for PC key bindings?
I want will use lean moves
I want key bindings with multi keys, like SHIFT+A, SHIFT+D
5700xt 450 bucks
5700 XT is $449
5700 379
and faster than 2070
Wow that is a great deal
what is 2070 normally? 550?
RX 5700 XT 8GB- $449 - 10% faster than RTX 2070
RX 5700 8GB - $379 - 15% faster than RTX 2060
2070 roughly 500 bucks atm, 2060 around 350
suprise coming

16 CORE CPU
3950X
@mortal nacelle
4.7 GHz
$749
September
We collected Navi & Ryzen architecture information, specs, overclocking and LN2 overclocking frequencies, memory frequency, ray tracing, and more. Ad: Buy MS...

intel is pretty butt blasted right about meow
Holy shit, 4.7 16 core
Well unless there's something seriously wrong I know what I'm getting to replace my old 5820K
Those true 14 phase gigabyte boards are also calling my name
Yea my 4790 is looking on it's way out
Darn good chip but yeah, looking at a fair few years old now
Damn those new chips have me getting all moist
these 1st gen Navi cards aren't 100% 7nm
there is still 14nm stuff
and still some GCN in the architecture, next year we will probably see complete 7nm and RDNA
Navi isn't too interesting for me tbh, I've got a 2080ti so I won't be upgrading that for yonks
Yup
Hence why the upgrade, just haven't been keen to go to a 9 series of Intel because of the prices
Hi I have a problem 5 days ago I bought a gigabyte 500 bb plus 80 and a ssd kingston of 240gb to combine it with ryzen 1600 and zotac 1060 amp edition and the mother asrock ab350m when I play bfv I can be playing 2 hrs and when i exit of the round of the game the pc rebooted and did not boot correctly and turned off again and got stuck on the windows start screen turned off and on again and start is the 2nd time he does it
Data to take into account:
The 1060 has coil whine but never gave me problems with the generic power suppy that I had
The ssd is without dock bay with air but half hanging or maybe a redist can be the problem , sorry my english
If the SSD is connected correctly it hanging shouldn't be an issue as especially 240gb ones are very light, although the fact it's starting makes it sound like a windows issue. Do you have a windows bootable USB or a cd handy?
Also if you boot into bios is it showing the SSD?
ManicDerrikk, yes it appears in the boot bios, i reinstalled al VC redist, play 1 round and not reboot also i disabled superfetch
Why do you blame the Devs? @Mroha#6827
You realize they have a system where they are given specific goals & expectations that they HAVE to go through with, whether they agree with it or not?
Its like a police officer, he can't just do or not do something if he agrees or disagrees with it, hes expected to carry it out either way, so blame the people up top, not the Devs

He left so ๐คท
RIS and FidelityFX looks better than DLSS
Radeon made image sharpening possible without losing performance
radeon 5700 xt beats an rtx 2070 in battlefield v at 1440p by 22%, 5700 beats rtx 2600 by 21% vs according to amd, 5700 xt sounds good to me ๐ธ ๐ธ ๐ธ
206 241 163 114 266 391 205 248 fps <-- ryzen 3800x 206 236 163 114 259 360 188 245 fps <-- ryzen 3600x
according to amd's slides going from a $250 processor to a $400 processor doesn't help framerates much
But I need to know more about gpu encoding improvements for amd gpus because I prefer gpu encoding to save cpu performance
๐ค
^ That. Actually, that for every company. ๐
I just wait to see the benchmarks on userbench.com
since like all the benchmark data is from people who run the benchmark on their pc's
userbenchmark is garbage
give a pretty realistic result give or take 5%~
give or take the whole benchmark
oh?
its not that bad
I can overclock my CPU to 7ghz under LN2 and it treats it the same
It will give you a worse benchmark score if its slower lmao
and better if its faster
Not to be super off-topic, but what you see from Cloud Imperium games for Star Citizen is an amazing way to actually see what frames hardware produces on average, when the rubber meets the road: https://robertsspaceindustries.com/telemetry
Just record user framerates and put them in a matrix. Questions answered cleanly on "how does this work for this game?" Shocked more companies don't do it. ๐คท
What do you mean. ' Treats it the same '?
like for the average "benchmark"
it treats them the same
It doesn't remove outliners
the average is the average of everyones tests 
bet
a few outliers out of 1000+ data points bearly shifts the average
You've taken a statistics class before right?
Memory is huge one
Almost no one enables XMP
yet by spec Zen 2 will support the 3200 JEDEC
and should use 3200 JEDEC or faster RAM for proper performance
not 2133 jedec
You know that each test is barely affected by ram types?
unless you are running the test on some old pc133 system
lol
Faster clocked ram has worse timings
Lower latency is better if you don't need the extra bandwidth provided by a higher frequency
but thats not relevant to the tests since it has individual tests for all of the components on a system
do you understand how infinity fabric scales off of memory, how RAM timings and frequency work, and overall how RAM actually impacts performance?
I can also run my userbenchmark run at 4200 12-11-11-28 if I have a properly binned kit and one of three motherboards on Intel
RAM timings is how many clocks it takes to do whatever the timing does
So if CL20, it takes 20 clocks to do that command
So higher frequency higher timings is still better
and if the CPU natively supports a higher frequency, that is the intended RAM configuration
I'm not a expert overclocker but I have a solid understanding of computing because that's what I'm going to school for. I'm not up to date with a technology that was announced 2 years ago though, since I've never had to interact with amd products really. I just know that it allows for a mesh based communication system that scales nicely.
but anyway
Userbench is a reliable tool
Just because it doesn't cater to your outlier data that you submit while overclocking doesn't invalidate it as a useful tool.
It does cater to outliner data, which is the issue
Outliers only affect small sample sizes
To compare two CPUs you want to control every possible variable you can
Since you are comparing the CPUs, not rest of their system
If you have a large sample size, outliers have a diminishing return on the average of the sample set
For a small sample set, that's a valid argument.
Userbench has 1000's of benchmarks for almost every system/part
You also have the people never touching their BIOS
and buying the cheapest possible ram
and?
and installing their RAM wrong
You can't really install ram incorrectly. There are only sub-optimal configurations 
Yes you can
After the cpu's actually out for a month there will be plenty of benchmarks
single channel on a dual channel CPU fucks your performance
The 16 core is already going to have memory bandwidth issues, don't make it worst
I'm not here to debate cpu specifics, I'm just defending the utility of userbenchmark
which is to give people who don't care to understand how each part of a system impacts performance a shitty basic overlook because "muh averages" and would rather click the first google link instead of finding proper reviews using proper benchmarks that use modern workloads
You don't understand how averages work do you?
With an increasing sample size, outliers have a diminishing effect on averages.
predator basically doesnt approve anything other than personally testing it yourself
ive yet to see a software/program/anything that he approves of
If you're looking for a completely optimal test with things like a delidded CPU and an overclock, I guess all you'd actually care about is the outliers that statistics properly smooth out ๐คท
(And at that point, it's all just the silicon.)
On a related note to delidding, I'm on a 7700k that I have idling at 25-30C (two cores are around 30, the other two are cooler). Anyone here have experience with the delidding temp gains on Intel CPUs that are already idling relatively cool?
Cinebench R20
Control for memory
Good direct comparison
Gaming that you control for memory and GPU
Include 1% and 0.1% averages for a good benchmark
Encoding tests, control for memory (see the common theme?)
Oh god, that has to be a blast @sharp pivot
Does userbenchmark even use AVX? Probably not
ok so i have a problem i just get 60fps in battlefield on Ultra/high/medium etc with a i7-4790k and a rtx 2070 with 16gb of ram. idk what my problem is but i should get way more
even if im on low setting im still on 60fps
disable vsync
Sounds like you have either v-sync on or frame cap
turning off Vsync just gave me 5fps
my drivers on the i7 is from 2006 tho
but its the newest ones
CPU doesn't have a driver in that sense
idk what those drivers was then xd
what resolution are you at?
1920x1080
and with ultra settings you are getting 65 fps?
yes
with an i7 4790k and 2070
so 65 at ultra, 60 on low
ye
you tested low since youve turned off vsync?
yep
did you toggle between dx 11 and dx 12
and future frame render (i turn it off because of input lag, but others say it gives them more fps)
i could try that
...also, can you open your task manager, and tell us what your CPU is at, %-wise?
I almost want to change the description to "Not tech support" 
If you're pegged at 100% CPU, that'll be your answer on what the limiter is.
I run a i3-8100 and can run the game ultra :/
Anyone can run the game on ultra
well ill try to dig some more on google
dx 11/12 and future frame didnt help?
can you guys think of anything fun/useful to do with a older dual pentium III system?
play some old games it like doom, quake diablo, starcraft, wolfenstein, etc
turn it in to a retro gaming computer
I'd using for some older gaming, but It has a server motherboard that doesn't support a decent gpu. Just PCI slots
tbh I still play all of those lol
zandronum doom?
you know it


random tip I can provide guys (you can test it yourself maybe it works or doesn't for you)
Riva stats server that comes with MSI after burner is a huge resource hog. Well it may not be "Huge" but still I installed it to monitor a few metrics in-game and performance dropped a lot
I would suggest to remove it and install only afterburner and keep it running in the back ground.
This is very random but I was so surprised by it that I felt I had to share it
Ryzen 5 3400G is actually looking good
$20 cheaper than the launch MSRP of the 2400G

when you can get 4c8t for 150 bucks
and a iGPU that can run better than the Xbox One
or get a 2c 4t from intel

50% more cache, 300 MHz higher boost, 150 MHz higher clock for the iGPU, same TDP
the Ryzen 5 2400G gets equal performance to a locked i7-4770
so maybe the 3400G will be equal to a locked i7-7700

Once you account for security migations
and that you have to disable hyperthreading on intel

I wish their APUs weren't a generation behind
I'd like to see a 7nm 3400G
do you think the jump between Zen+ and Zen2 is like going from Haswell to Coffee Lake

the R5 3600 is already like 25% faster than the R5 2600
or about 15% faster if they're both at the same clock speed
man what a week for news
lmao Raja looking swole
smh its not that Microsoft just fucks the CCX selection normally
๐ค
I found out today why Adobe Premiere doesn't work well with Ryzen when compared to Intel, because Premiere uses the built-in iGPU on Intel CPUs
eh quicksync isn't that great
looks like I have some updating to do lol
my 4790 shall move to my 2nd pc
but...with 8 cores its already like 2 computers bruh
just 1 more month
whatcha getting?
proooobably 3700
prepare for the 21st century fam
Ryzen 7nm layout and routing
you can see that it's the 16-core
the cores
the I/O
and those silver lines between the cores and I/O is the infinity fabric
and the silver lines that go to the right of the cores is the infinity fabric for the RAM I think
@latent light True, it uses quicksync... however, there is an unofficial/unsupported plugin that does this: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/2241692 You'd have to search for the plugin (because Adobe mods don't like sharing download links), but it is out there in the wild until Adobe updates with official support.

The quality of the video may suffer, but the encode times are insane comparatively speaking.
There was a comparison video on YouTube somewhere showing the difference states of the final product video. I don't have the link anymore.
@latent light https://www.voukoder.org <-- has multiple encoders and uses GPUs.
QuickSync is a GPU feature, not a CPU one. Intel CPUs just happen to come with integrated GPUs. Both AMD and Nvidia have their own hardware encoding blocks on GPUs.
I pulled it down awhile back, but I've never used it.
Ryzen CPUs got a nice performance jump from Windows 10 version 1903
QuickSync is the GPU feature that utilizes iGPU on Intel processors in their current implementation--or, one can encode via CPU alone. The difference is relatively imperceptible other than the encoding haste.
sucks that I'm on 1803 and have no option to update to a newer version
You can't update? Why's that?
yeah @latent light that doesnt make much sense
spanish link but should work anyway for updating to 1903 https://www.microsoft.com/es-ES/software-download/windows10 @latent light
Perf boosts to ryzen is great when I'm planning to go with Zen 2
If Zen 2 has good memory sypport
I'm going to jump ship and keep Intel for benching shit and giggles
Ryzen 7 2700 only $200
๐ฉ
gonna wait for that juicy 3600 though, should be roughly 20% faster in single core than the 2700 at the same price
@steep gust did you see how small the dies are for the Navi GPUs? I bet the 5700 XT could be sold at $250 and they'd still be making profit
I thought smaller dies = more chips on the wafer = more savings

They would just sell the failures as the lower tier gpu
laser off the dead cores and move it down the product stack
but GDDR6 and the memory controller, etc cost a lot
I wanna see what their 75W card will be
probably no better than the 1650
GDDR6 costs like 60% more than GDDR5

They'd be getting it a bit cheaper though
yeah
It should also be borne in mind that the quoted reference prices are for a purchase quantity of 2,000 units, graphics card manufacturers are likely to buy significantly larger quantities and thus receive the components cheaper.
Generally you buy trays (well its probably rolls for memory ICs)
3dcenter.org estimates the possible discount on 20 to 40 percent and we would also like to point out once again that the following data are estimates.
If I buy 10,000 CPUs from Intel I'm still paying the 1,000 CPU cost just 10 times ๐ฉ
I can't find data on the cost of production for GDDR6
Cost of production isn't really the expense generally for electronics
its everything leading up to mass production


NVidia releasing competitive low(er) end products? never happens
Here from L.A in the USA Dr. Lisa Su announced the new AMD Navi architecture with 2 new cards coming in July (I believe July 7th launch with CPUs). On top of...
did you see the anti-lag presentation?
there were some cool things, they have a competitor for DLSS
called Radeon Image Sharpening
that has no performance hits
well they showed that it was like 3% performance hit at worst case scenario
If you are doing any extra math in the background you get performance hits 
which is barely a mark
You would be surprised what people pay for those last few percent
Psycho actually does have some logic behind it and he is buying it also for HWBot
There will always be someone who just wants raw performance
Paying extra when on a budget, less so
there's people out there that pay over $2,000 to build a PC that will last them 5 years and there's people that spend that much every few months for best performance possible





