#technology
1 messages ยท Page 170 of 1
but this is where they should have came out swinging
im not watching anything else, and ibet a lot of people arent as well
vega 7 announced
.
exactly
they teased ryzen 7nm
unnamed card with unnamed specs other than its 8c16t
ran fh4 with the v7 card at 1080p ultra settings at 115 fps
(apparently that matches a 1080ti and a 6700k)
yeah I'm reading it's supposed to compete against the 2080
this is the biggest let down of the year confirmed
that unnamed ryzen cpu in cinebench beat a 9900k while using 30% less power
FOR GAMING yea it competes with 2080
but thats not what its billed as
they kept saying "this card is for the creators"
so everything shown so far, is GREAT for creators
using 30% less power than a 9900k is really easy ๐
just have to wait and see
ye
meh showing for the average gamer, but shit looks good for workstations
hope they do it better than intel tho
i wonder how a cheap chinese 500 l/h pump and reservoir would perform
for water cooling
aios are below 100 l/h
i would worry more about the noise of that pump ๐
the only good thing that could come from the vega 7 is that it'll probably be price dropped quicker than the other cards throughout the year
ehh, i see it as a titan competitor, i have no interest in it
tbh if Vega 7 had only 8GB, it could be sold for much cheaper
no reason to have 16GB except for workstation use
because its a workstation gpu
i mean, at 700 bucks to have roughly the same titan specs seems pretty good
what I liked is that it was a reference card with 3 open-air fans
instead of the shitty blower design lol
^
that is pretty new
but dw about the design since other brands are gonna change it probably
these are workstation cards, dont put money into looks, put it on cooling
maybe they saw that the Vega 64 was hot as hell on the reference blower lol
yea
because Vega 64 reference throttled
vega was also overvolted af
Vega with a simple -50mV undervolt goes a long way
im confused to why undervolting improve performance
Less heat allows more headroom for the gpu to clock up I think
why would they do that factory?
๐คท
NVIDIA's "GSync Compatible" displays use adaptive sync (_VBLANK attribute) and will work with FreeSync displays to smooth-out frame presents. Ad: Buy Gigabyt...

looks like spilled ink
surprise, this cpu is threadripper sized
16cores might be possible with AM4 socket, but not on older motherboards, most likely need vrm upgrade
sub $100 B350/B450 boards might not let them go higher than base clock
but I'm sure a X370 will
idk who would upgrade to a $500ish 16-core CPU on a B350 board though
there were many truly trash x370 boards that had same vrm as 50-70 dollar b350 boards
because engineering is cheap if every board has same vrm setup from 50 to 150 usd
@latent light Uh yeah leaks are full of bullshit and I am doubting the claims
You got an I/O die and the actual CPU
16c on one die would get crazy hot
where did they say 16c?
Nowhere
we got
Literally zero specs
or pricing
or anything outside of mid year launch
they said 8c16t
uh yeah that is already possible on Rzyen
yep
but thats what they demoed
(maybe its ryzen 5 at 8c16t)
and thats what beat a 9900k on cinebench?
AMD made some huge announcements earlier today, including plans for Ryzen 3 which will launch in the "middle of 2019" and Radeon VII, a 7nm Vega 2 based GPU ...
there is space to fit another chiplet
https://twitter.com/markhachman/status/1083097464624693248 like we have this
but that doesn't mean another 8 cores
idk, im just waiting
im not much for speculating, doesnt mean anything even if im 100% right
and you have to realize the trace density for those CPUs are already crazy high
So there might not actually be enough space for another die
first gen and second gen Ryzen have 1 single die
why would they make 2 seperate ones on 3rd gen
Rzyen has two dies
just put together?
They are beside each other
You can see the divide in the solder
Actually can't find any pictures without the solder
Some say its dual 4c and some say its a single 8c
I think they didn't reveal Navi because no one would buy the RX 590 anymore lol
if they did
I don't think they did because its not ready
you can see the divide on this one
if Navi did get announced, RX 590 would become immediately irrelevant lol
The Infinity Fabric On-Package (IFOP) SerDes deal with die-to-die communication in the same package
it's nice that the reference Vega 7 has 3 open-air fans instead of the awful blower fan lol
Looks like shit tho
I don't like the transparent fans
well I don't like anything transparent lol
would be a wise decision if AMD releases a 8GB variant of the Vega 7 for $100-150 cheaper

^^^
8GB of HBM2 memory costs <$150 alone
this is their TITAN versions
and not use HBM2
doesnt titan usually come out first?
no
titan is usually the last card of Nvidia to release
i thought titan came out before 1080ti
no
or was that 980ti?
1080 was the first card, then the 1080 ti
all i remember was people memeing it up
saying "they release titan to release a gamer versions thats cheaper and better"
for the most money
and the Titan X maxwell is better than a 980ti 
when the Ti comes out, it takes the xx80's price and the xx80 price drops a bit
the cards are better for gaming, but perf isnt dramatically different for the price difference
uh no the 1080ti cost more than a 1080
and 1080 prices didn't fall for awhile
1080ti was like $750 at launch with the 1080 being $600
1080 Ti msrp was $699
well official price and actual price means nothing for launches
dont buy outside of launch window
2070 founders was 600
yuh
a lot of people like blue although they are loud
and a good keyboard is like $60-70
theres a black one for cheaper
with actual switches
i mean, if they are gateron or kailh switches they will be fine
I really want Aliaz switches
fucking love them
I might need 100g because I broke my razer keycaps from simply pressing them
fingers too strong
or shitty keyboard


MX clear are pretty loud
thats why you get aliaz
Aliaz is almost as quiet as membrane lol
thats membrane yo
Mecha-Membrane
I would prefer a straight membrane then
which is fake mechanical
Like I use a membrane keyboard because I'm poor and its not bad
i actually liked the feel of the mecha membrane that razer had, the ornata
but it wasnt worth the 100 they were asking
membrane isn't as bad as people claim tbh
mechanical is better for people who type a lot and listen to them self type
when your gaming you're not putting much attention to your keyboard
i just like the feel
durability means nothing with the price differences
theres no performance gain difference
its not like upgrading a sensor on a mouse
I just want a more quiet keyboard that doesn't disturb other people in my house at 2 am
lol
there is very little difference pass a point on mouse sensors
aliaz
you can get a 3310, hero, or even a 3360/3366 sensor for like 20-30 now
theres no reason to not have a good sensor
3310 is the least i recommend
uh because like
You hit a point you can't tell the difference
just buy a mouse that works for you
sensors aren't the only thing that goes into a mouse 
sensor is the most important thing that goes into a mouse
Plenty of mice have a good sensor and are shit
I'd say ergonomics is leagues above a sensor
nah
So you would prefer a literal block
as long as it has a good sensor?
Hand cramps in 5 minutes
compared to a mouse that felt good but had a shit sensor?
depends how shit the sensor is
Uh yeah you realize that even a cheap wireless mouse have decent enough sensors for most peoeple?
most people suck
Like yeah 1000hz polling rate is nice
polling rate means nothing
but can you truly tell the difference? Ehh
between 500 and 1000 polling rate?
no
acceleration and accuracy and LOD and tracking speeds i can tell though
I mean polling rate is pretty important
It could be the most accurate sensor in the world, but if its 100hz its gonna hurt twitch movement
grantd, i dont actually play at the tracking speeds sensors top our near
While it being 3 pixels off won't kill me
idk any decent sensor that doesnt do at least 500hz
and me saying sensor is most important doesnt mean id play with a brick
it means... sensor is most important
i dont get how people always twist saying something like that as meaning ITS THE ONLY thing that matters
my deathadder has options for 125, 500 and 1000
you won't know the difference between 500 and 1000
humans aren't capable of it
500hz is already 2 milliseconds
rate the build so far
the storage was already bought but everything else is the big think
Get a way better cooler
Better PSU
And you can go with a 3000mhz CL16 RAM kit and see almost no drops and save money
I own that kit and its CJR, not B-Die if you were wondering
Also
one of the cheapest possible motherboards
$300 CPU
And honestly I'd recommend Rzyen over Intel if you are playing at higher resolutions or dont have a super crazy high refresh rate monitor
Cheaper and Zen 2 will support AM4
While LGA1151v2 will end up replaced, let's be real
Oh yeah an 8700k is fucking overkill for that
That prefer core count or clock speed?
ryzen is generally better for that
clock speed
Like Adobe software can take advantage of QuickSync
But not all do
Vega 7 boost clock is 1800 MHz, almost 300 MHz higher than Vega 64
I mean for $300 that 8700k is a decent deal
not impressive tbh
I really hope for an 8GB model though
mm
And then if you go with a locked motherboard, get cheaper RAM since you cant overclock memory on a locked motherboard
so it is true that the 3rd gen Ryzen cpu that was put up against the i9-9900K is a 8c/16t cpu
they also used Cinebench which is alright but there is better things to use for comparisons
tfw navi will probably be announced later 
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/vZjsr6 @lime pollen
That motherboard is pretty cheap, and doesn't seem bad so I'd leave it
Cheaper RAM, better PSU, and a better cooler if you find one in stock
danke for the suggestions 
5+2 phase VRM
still decent
So perfectly fine for a locked 8700
my alternate mobo was gonna be this https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA6ZP7BR4289&ignorebbr=1
and I had it overclocked to 4.4

on a scale of 1 to 10 couric, how much couric is bfv in this stage
like 3
Not much variety with the maps tbh
Gunplay gets kinda boring
Vehicles are boring as sin
interesting
It could be a good game
nothing like good ol' quake or cs
but I'm not going put thousands of hours into it like BF4
all battlefield games take a year before it's fun to play
Hardline was fun at launch ๐
lol
that sounds more like stockholm syndrome than real fun
I found Hardline to be a ton of fun
Yes it was different, yes it had a lot of issues, but it was fun
Like man
If Visceral was still around and could do Hardline 2.0 (without battlefield in the name so we don't deal with gate keeping shitters) it would be fun
hardline mainly suffered because of the game's setting
Its like
They ignored Battlefield Heros existed
2142 also wasn't really "battlefield" since it was futuristic then
We have more information on Vega VII & Ryzen 3000 after meeting with AMD at CES. The Vega VII boosting behavior will be retooled from Vega 56/64. Ad: Buy Gig...
CPUs could come out before the motherboards
lol
X570 will be like Z390
won't be any different to X470
maybe USB 3.1
well maybe higher memory support
eh doubt
Memory on X470 is hitting CPU issues
Like if any board straight up doesn't post at 3866mhz, its not the motherboard then
What price would you guys pay for a used i7 6700k
foun d one online debating pulling the trigger currently have an i5 6500
Like $100-150
oof
which i thought was crazy high aswell
You can get a 1200 + B450 motherboard for less than that
yea i know
its still a decent processor from what little ive researched but the price is well wrong
may hit him with an offer for $130 see if he throws up or not
for $225 I'd get something like a Ryzen 5 2600X or maybe i5-8500
I dont NEED to upgrade per say. Just got bored and looked around my local craigslist
I wouldnt say horribly
See the dozen "gaming PCs" for $2000 with bad monitors, bad parts, and a bad description
you always want to list it for higher than youd be willing to accept
I wouldn't call a 1070 and like a 7600k "4k ready"
Oh i understand that
but man are people scummy and do that shit
and if the person giving that much money doesn't research h honestly its their loss
YIKES
or to get someone who doesn't know what they are buying and just want a PC
Xeon X3470 + 4GB ram + gtx 960 for $350
Like parnets buying their kid their first gaming PC, if the ad says its 4k / VR ready why would they buy it?
They don't care enough to learn why 6c 12t is much better than 4c 8t, and its confusing with product schemes being all over the place
I understand where your coming from. But most of the fault lies in the buyer rather than the seller.

rgb tax lol
1080 Ti aorus
500ish in the used market around me
but that is most likely a 2700x
its a 1700x
So he is preying on people to not realize the 1080ti is out of production
because used 1080ti are like $550
Found a gigabyte AORUS Xtreme waterforce for $590
it sold in like 45 minutes
Think about it
$400 was standard for like a week
I'm sad I didn't have any money then
Id shit myself if one popped up for 400
LOOOL
$200
for a G4400 and 8gb ram
that cpu is like $50 or less new and that ram is like $80
Man some of the new 2080ti are interesting
Like makes me want to save for a year and hope prices fall
If the rumors of Nvidia possibly doing an XOC BIOS are real
i ran into someone selling a $200 gtx 680 and then claimed it was because they sell 600 new
oof
or just buy the one with a 500-550w BIOS and get a waterblock
but like $1600+ big oof
Yeah but it would be amazing for overclocking
Since the FTW3 only has a like 350w max power limit
$300
I mean $300 for a vega 64 is good
Most my fb marketplace is a dude selling a 1080 for $360
Like would buy if I had the money
if I got a Vega I'd undervolt it immediately
I'd flash an XOC BIOS and toss like +100% power limit for that extra 50mhz
oof
but nah because no custom loop
Can't be having a 500w GPU yet
A CPU loop with excessive rads would only be $500 or so
So add GPU waterblocks + 2 fittings for $150 each and not bad
uh yeah OpenGL 1.0 isn't gonna run DX11
Instantly recognized that computer, never even owned one either
@unborn epoch you're back?
ya
And yeah they only ever released 1 patch (the one in early December)
Oof
Yeah
I mean discord is alive
But afaik game is dying
Havent personally played for like 3 weeks
I'm just waiting for the Jan patch.. game too broken for me rn
Yeah
DICE is still just giving PR responses to everyone
Company coins still broken
Assignments not tracking properly
No progression
Etc.
haven't seen him in a few days
panda popped in for a little and left again
Hi guys, just to let you all know, portions clean windows install and it appears to have fixed my issues played for a few hours last night
Our coverage CES 2019 is Sponsored by Corsair ! Learn more about the Corsair One i140, i160 and Corsair One Pro i180 Desktop PCs at https://www.corsair.com/u...
really nice
hmmm 50 bucks for good perf on a fan that doesnt look ugly AF
inb4 le grand macho shits on it
anyone having issue to connect to online play for battlefield 1 ?
from Malaysia btw
just bought battlefield 1 and cant even play it online
fml
system?
specs wont matter about online
single stick 8 gig of ram would ruin your fps tho
hmm, tried oc'ng my watercooled 9900k to 5.0ghz, 73-74C running cinebench not as high as expected
Okay guys. I'm a little panicked because i just bought a Gaming X 1070 and i run BFV Low settings 25 fps.... Somebody got ideas why?
what cpu? what cpu & gpu load?
1070 should definitely not get 25 fps if the rest of the system is up to snuff
what cpu do you have? Fx-4100?
AMD Phenom II X6 running arround 4.0 ghz
must be a troll
agree
voltage is more important than frequency for heat
@minor turret Nope
play at higher settings, should see better performance out of that cpu
Bulldozer?
that cpu is at least 7 years old
playing at low settings on an old CPU like that is just putting more work on it
Auto settings sets my game settings on ultra. I will play a round right now and see the FPS
umm that cpu is like really old and low performance
graphics settings wont affect your max frame rate your cpu can produce
like really really bad
that cpu is like 50% of the performance of 4770k
the least i would take is 3700k
and that aint even close to 3770k
sandy was release in 2011
its not your gpu @elfin jungle
uh yeah that shows nothing and looks photoshopped anyways
and i7 at 4.5-4.7 and above would be fine for sub 144 hz gaming
Also no overclock but more than stock frequency
lmao you really going to think im going to photoshop this๐
big bullshit
Phenom II X6 at 4 GHz should see close performance to a Fx-8350 lol
1987mhz is well above stock frequency
Can't do that with +0 core
and stock power targets
not even a 2080ti would give you better fps with that cpu you have
because there is just too much going on in the game for your cpu to handle
(OC Mode 1797 MHz / 1607 MHz) (Gaming Mode 1771 MHz / 1582 MHz) (Silent Mode 1683 MHz / 1506 MHz)
So yeah explain that screenshot
Shows stock settings but its not stock
Also using GPU Tweak 2.0 instead of Afterburner 
uh no
fx8350 is like +30-40% better than the x6
Massive differences in architects
+33% faster multicore speed says userbenchmark.com
@steep gust that is gpu tweak 2.0
userbenchmark is not a good source of comparisons tbh
??
So basically my cpu bottlenecking my GPU
yes
definitely
your gpu was at 37C :D
there are some truly trash benchmarks on that site meaning average is dragged down
only with high-end gpus?
your gpu is literally doing nothin
if you tweak your pc you will get over 90th percentile on any test
because it was fine with my GTX970/RX580
anything greater than a GTX 1050 will be bottlenecked by that Phenom II X6
and userbenchmark just isn't a good benchmark
welp. lets buy a new pc instead of a gpu๐ฆ
uh yeah
huh? how much fps you had on 970/580?
For $300 you can go pretty far
userbenchmark gives you a good estimate of performance between different hardware
Instead you bought a GPU that was clearly overkill
Zino first, download FurMark and Unigine Heaven Benchmark to see if your GPU is fine
lol
Its like the P95 of CPUs
Not the best stability test, but it gets hot as hell
really need to check to see if your new GPU is fine before blowing $300+ on other new components
yea maybe something funky going on with the gpu
@elfin jungle your RX 580 only got 50-60 fps on low? huuuuuuuuuuuuuuge bottleneck
You can easily look at task manager
appearly
my RX 580 gets over 80 fps on Ultra
60
should be at 90+ without fps capped
fml so that means new CPU = new motherboard = new ram = shit loads of money
if you want to upgrade your CPU/motherboard/RAM, I can show you some great value
nah i'm good with knowledge about building pc's
3
bro you were just complaining about low fps with your GTX 1070 but have a fucking Phenom II
so not new ram

gtx 1070 = cost of anything better than youre current cpu/mb/ram
Stay on DDR3 and buy a like 4790k
@latent light i said building pc's / picking parts. not how my own outdated pc works
uh yeah if you know how to pick parts
or use pcpartpicker
you can realize a 9 year old CPU isn't gonna fly with a newer GPU
ye i can see
DDR4 is like $100 for 16GB
oof
4770k costs more than ryzen 2600 used
lets sell the 1070 and buy atleast new cpu\๐
there are a lot of people on ddr3 still
you could get a used i7-4770K with a compatible motherboard and not have to upgrade ram
if he gets a newer gen board, he will have to spend $100 on DDR4 ram lol
Might be worthwhile
imo, the Ryzen 5 2600 route would be fine if you want to futureproof yourself a little
@latent light Ill go with AMD ๐
uh no?
First off overclocking over XMP generally nets very very very small real world gains
and the 2600 is fine over the 2600x if you understand basic CPU overclocking
people should only get the 2600X if they don't like overclocking and want a slightly better stock cooler
Also most DDR4 ICs don't overclock very far
So unless he wants to spent $100 more for a B-Die kit he won't even see any noticeable advantages in overclocking
talking about ddr4 platform not ram itself
uh yeah its the chipset that dedicated the RAM
and if you want static vcore then its pretty similar
pretty much only happened with skylake
AMD modern CPUs that use DDR3 are using older tech
Uh you realize Skylake is the name of the main architect for all modern Intel CPUs?
Kabylake, Coffeelake, and Coffeelake Refresh are all revisions of the same exact architect
that's why we still see the name Skylake-X for i9
everything since 2015 is a refresh for Intel
also, going from 22nm to 14nm didn't make much difference for intel lol
it did for overclocking
Intel 14nm clocks great if you can keep it cool and don't lose the silicon lottery
does kaby lake run hotter than skylake
It shouldn't, but Intel has been pushing clocks higher and higher
I don't remember people saying the 6700K ran hot but I do remember seeing forums and videos about how hot the 7700K is
very few 6700K could reach 5 GHz at safe voltages
the average 7700K could reach 5 GHz though lol
Top 6% of 6700k could do 4.9ghz at 1.44v
I wonder what they did to improve clocks by that much from a refresh
22nm to 14nm
6700K is 14nm
Also the average 7700k did 5ghz at almost unsafe voltages
14n refinement then, the first of any generally have issues
maybe because the 6700K was the first 14nm and wasn't refined?
Since Intel doesn't get to use other companies to refine the process before them
lol
6700K - 4.0 GHz base, 4.2 GHz boost
7700K - 4.2 GHz base, 4.5 GHz boost
8700K - 3.7 GHz base, 4.7 GHz boost
so weird man
more cores meant they had to drop base clock and the 4.7 GHz is only 1 core
base clock means nothing
6700K only boosts by 200 MHz lmao
8700k all core turbo is 4.4ghz IIRC
I guess all core boost?
dunno its annoying to find
my 1600 boosted to like 3.875 GHz at 1.41v for some reason when I got it, was annoying as hell because it's only supposed to go to 3.5
I think it was something to do with my motherboard
I got it manually set to 3.8GHz at 1.375v now which is fine for me
Rip, just had the same crash again :( definitely a battlefield issue here
or hardware?
What crash?
Problem solved!
This is brilliant ๐
Don't get me wrong Radeon 7 is bit meh, but that's a lot of expensive ram for creating content and it has more than the 2080ti. Yes it seems pointless for us. It's exciting to see they are up there. Even Nvidia is feeling the heat
It's arguably the best card in its niche now, but they still need a upper tier card for the general gaming audience.
that will come, less ram and less price
hell, we dont know the leaks might even be right
it proved they have the performance
indeed
It's a Dell pre-built, it deserves all it gets 
poor case? That case is cheaper than a "decent" McDonalds menu.
Indeed, plus this is still only vega not even volta that is due this year
Also yes thats a dell thing, those are awful



Yeah, there is space for additional chiplet, but you have to consider temps when they add another 8 cores there, no way the old motherboards will be able to provide enough power for the 16 cores, and what about temperatures, if the 8c16t was pushing 135watts in blender, I am imaging at least like 200W with 16c32t in the same size chip
why buy 16c32t then :D?
also if they gonna provide stock cooler with the cpu, its gonna be like nhd 15
no one would buy a 16 core CPU with a $100 motherboard
if they dont want it to be throttled heavily
I mean are those not the amd "strong points"... support for AM4, stock cooler etc
not all first gen Ryzen CPUs had stock coolers
1600x, 1700x, 1800x...
all 2nd gen did though
yeah, people can though get the 8c16t ryzen for their old 370/470 boards easily though
so that will be nice for them
2700x runs nice on even A320
it will turbo to over 4GHz
and that's a 12nm 8 core
7nm 8 core will be a lot more efficient
also thinking about the pricing on vega VII, I highly doubt about the prices leaked by adoredtv, they are far too low for release
tbh A320 would probably have a short life span with a 2700x on turbo lol
would expect at least something like $349 for the 8c16t
I think the infinity fabric was the issue with ryzen and slower memory
as it synced its frequency to the ram frequency
and it was marketed as a "good" thing
Intel gets ahead when games are played at lower settings
and lower resolution
infinity fabric future is good
as long as ram speed keeps increasing and multiple cores
I mean I think 9900k runs at 4.7ghz ring frequency, not sure what all the ring frequency covers
if I understood correctly when read that briefly, I could in theory use mem up to 4.7ghz
Can somebody help
I have i5 4690k
And rx 5850
580*
My cpu usage is 100% and gpu usage won't go above 50%
it also drops to 40
and my fps can go from 80-90 ( ULTRA) to 30-40 ( Even if i use Low/medium/Ultra) wont help
CPU bottleneck
BFV requires a decent amount of cores
6+ cores
using lower settings makes the bottleneck worse
So which cpu should i get
budget wise? Ryzen 5 2600
my budget 410$ but i want to get some good cpu + mobo and cooler.
Ryzen??
Wbu i5 6600k?
don't need to buy a cooler for ryzen since the cooler it comes with will work fine
Ryzen 5 2600 is only $160 and comes with 6 cores/12 threads
and you can get an overclocking motherboard for it for around $80
how much is an i5-8400?
holy tits
2.8Ghz one
So which should i pick
check for a Ryzen 5 1600 instead of the 2600
@latent light
ye
what about DDR4 ram
you don't really need a good one
idk i just want anything that can fix my problem
I can run the game on ultra 80-100 fps
than suddenly it goes down to 30-40
when it happens i tried putting everything low and still same shit
yeah dips are caused by a lot of random action in game
idk if its cpu or gpu
if you play 32 player game modes you'd see better performance
it's CPU 100%
4 cores won't run BFV smooth
what's the price difference?
play another game that's not so CPU demanding
Idk i play other games fine as well
Like on high graphics
but than after some time there is fps drops or stuttring
I had bf1 and specs were i5 4460 and gtx 960
i got rx 580 and than my bf1 started working awful
so i got an i5 4690k from friend
and it got fixed
BF1 is smooth?
Rn after i got the i5 4690k yes
but before that
when i had upgraded gpu but still i had i5 4460
it was so bad
it felt like playing with potato
So now i got a cpu upgrade as well
and it fixed the bf1
I5 4690K only has 4 cores and 4 threads, it will be maxed out constantly in BFV
So
Even a 7600K will max out
what do u suggest?
I want 5 2600 cause its better and i want the best always
and u said it has good stock cooler
so its perfect.
?
yeah the stock cooler can even let it overclock some
A B450 motherboard is probably your best for the budget
I had not much issues with 4770k, running stableish 90+fps
hmm
that should be the same socket as the i5 4690?
Yeah you could look for a used 4770K
used nah
I7-4770K has 4 cores and 8 threads
And the Ryzen has 6 and 6 i think?
6 and 12
Thats better than 4 and 8
Look our pfps its like we some animal friends that dance toghter xDD
comparison
single core is similar
quad-core speed is slightly better for ryzen
multi-core is not even a fair comparison
I mean it would be cheapest alternative to get bf v running with decent fps for you
holy sheet, people sell those 4770ks for 180e+ on ebay
Abort mission
there is no 4770ks in my country
searched 3 shops and nothing + searched some search engine thinggy
they are not in retail anymore
Guess it has to be the ryzen
have to get used one
I hate used stuff
cheapest on ebay are like 100e
intel is better than rayzen ?
roughly 8% better in performance
if comparing models released in the same generation
amazon is always 30+$ on fax and shipping shit
do you have access to PCPartPicker in your country?
I have enough for the ryzen 5 2600 and B450 Aorus motherboard
And yes ofc i have access to PCPartPicker xd
you will need DDR4 ram too
Must or no?
shit
ye, thats why the 4770k would be ideal if you are just interested in getting better fps in bfv
have you considered how much you get selling your old parts?
maybe 150 for mobo+cpu+rams?
local online marketplace?
can we talk dm soon cause i have some school project
nah, im at work and
get 2 sticks of ram for ryzen
1 will see very low performance
That's only a 4GB single stick lmao
Wouldn't even boot BFV
yea, for ryzen you kinda need over 3000mhz ram, because of the infinity fabric
slower ram basically gimps your entire ryzen processor
4GB DDR4 is only $25 where I live
Don't need over 3000 for Ryzen, 3000 is the sweet spot
2666 will do fine
2400 is kind of meh
2133 is a big no
@burnt zinc since the pricing for you is really high, I'm going to consider these options
- The used i7-4770K
- Check for a Ryzen 5 1500x and a B350 motherboard and get 2x4GB DDR4 2666 MHz RAM
- Check for a Ryzen 5 2400G and B450, with the same Ram as above
- Ummmm.....
I would say the used 4770k to get over till ryzen 3rd gen, and save up some more money
most likely can resell the 4770k with like only 5-10% value loss
single stick = single channel, so it can only run up to half of the clockspeed of the ramstick, two sticks = dual channel, they run at the announced clockspeed of the ram
do you currently have single or 2 sticks?
I have a h97 pc mate Mobo btw
I currently have dual channel 8gb ddr3 and its from sume "Furryxx" version
Found only 1 i7 4770 ( non k) and he sells it for 410$
I need some other cpu than
is there any other cheap Cpus that are aviable to purchase?
Gonna need to do a bunch of looking, Haswell seems to keep its value really well in used
Any tips for squeezing a bit more performance out of an old quad core?
I have:
i5 3570k at 5.2GHz
16GB DDR3 @ 2000MHz
RX 580 8GB
Game dips below 60fps from time to time still
Running the game at 1600x900, DX11, graphics settings cranked to minimum, future frame rendering on
Nvidia control panel let's me choose between 0-4 pre-rendered frames (for future frame rendering). Is there smt similar for AMD?
Full-screen works best for me for fps
I'll look into it! Thanks!
Also there are some further settings you can turn off/down in config
Oooh, didn't know that.
Like turning AA off completely, iirc
I see! Will definitely look into that as well. Thanks!
Also I think GPU memory restriction is recommended to turn off with 4gb or more
Can't remember what it was for, but I also heard that UI upscaling was recommended to set to high
Could've been for other reasons but I guess it's worth looking into
Will do!
And i suppose you could turn down resolution scale to less than 100% if fps is still a "bottleneck", but idk what effect that has on fps or visual fidelity
I noticed that changing the graphics settings did not seem to have any effect between low to high. I suspect this poor old quad core is just getting too old to run well
I'll give those tweaks a whirl though!
@balmy finch try putting fps limiter to 60fps if u havent already, and try DX12 if u havent already to see if it helps (works better for some not for others, worth a shot)
Fps limiter helps a lot with cpu usage though
Invidia = envy in latin
green eye = envy symbol
nvidia = envious company confirmed?


AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
Micro Devices
Micro
Microsoft?
AMD owned by Microsoft confirmed


@sonic osprey ASUS is making a 32:9 super ultrawide monitor with 144hz


I love my 144 4k mointor โค
yes sir
kind of pointless because no card can reach 4K 144hz on triple A games currently
nah but my 2080ti is getting closed
do you plan on keeping it for a long time?
2080 Ti averages around 85 fps on 4K ultra settings in the multiplayer
in single player it's like 100
GPU's Used Nvidia RTX 2080 TI Founders Edition Asus GTX 1080 TI Founders Edition CPU - Coffee Lake 8700K CPU Cooler - Corsair H115i Motherboard - ASUS ROG In...













