#technology
1 messages ยท Page 169 of 1
No, there is not a single game that will use more than 32gb of ram and you will not be using VMs or video editing that needs that much either
this system will sacrifice gaming performance
so
so I threw a couple extra sticks of ram in there, big whoop
I could go for an i9 but thats a different socket type
i wouldnt even recommend the i9 for a gaming machine
even with the offers on it its still 200 more than it needs to be for the perf
i get the whole "save money and buy a better gpu" but I have a 1080 right now and it's not even being taxed because of cpu bottleneck
I can afford it, just feel like getting multiple builds
its about being smart
lol, nothing wrong with the build apart from "it could have a 2080 ti"
ill put one in eventually
Actually no there is a lot wrong
this screams i havent looked into what im doing and want good lets look at big money and ohhh more equals better
there has been no research done into this build
you want a build thats good for gaming?
I have a pretty good build for gaming
i'm looking for a different mobo, testing out quad channel
its gonna be fun. why all the hate
Because, you ask for opinions on a "gaming" system. That is clearly not a "gaming" focused system. you clearly knew this when linking it because you just said you have a good system for gaming
There are 500 dollar motherboards I could have bought.. there's faster larger ram sticks.... I haven't
your just trying to troll
i also have a ยฃ2000 system
It's gonna be pretty good for gaming
just i spent it wisely
Ah that explains a lot britbong
......
what
you asked for advice and then didnt like it so i got annoyed at you. for asking for help when you didnt want it. dont call me the troll
id have said go i7 8700 chip. max 32gb 3200mhz, ssd fine , 2070/2080 depending on budget,
coolers also good
probably halved the price and gaming perf will be better
or go the other way, ryzen 7 2700 , 32gb ram, 2070/2080
again pretty good perf, no bottlenecks and will still run VMs and such due to corecount
my brother has a TR 2950X, runs quad channel memory on it
the difference between dual and quad in gaming is maybe 5%
he is just a troll didnt actually want help, that system was not meant for gaming anyhow
lol keep saying that when I render your character first and headshot you in a game
AYYY
my brother has the 2950X I think for his work
yeah work makes sense
i went to his house back in october and he has all this weird shit in his office room
hahaha xD
literally hundreds of cables everywhere, like some kind of server shit
thats what most people say when they see mine xD
hmm not yet when are they out?
BIG thanks to our sponsors be quiet!, Lian Li, ViewSonic, Phanteks, and Deepcool for sending us to CES 2019. We hope your enjoy our coverage! Shop be quiet! ...
this fan
also pretty cool case
white ones?
yeah
ehhh
white tech looks tacky to me
ill let you know when ive seen in person though, if done right they will look hella nice
@crude flint The fuck? That is a terrible gaming rig
7820x is a bad CPU for gaming and always was, get an 9700k
That motherboard could be better, there is a reason its one of the cheapest X299 ones
64GB of RAM? You realize games don't even use 16GB? Also hitting faster RAM on an 8 dimm board is hard
970 Pro for a gaming machine? NVMe sees no real world benefit in gaming
So you plan to get a 1080? What? They are sold out everywhere and a 2070 is a better deal anyway
and that PSU isn't very good for $170
lmao
I scrolled down
AMD announcement tomorrow
@latent light Also Threadripper sees large gains between dual and quad channel memory
Like running threadripper on dual channel is bad
even for gaming?
but if more cores is done, it could be an issue, level one tech found a kernal issue with windows that means it doesnt deal with the threads as it should
Threadripper is already bad at gaming
you don't need to shoot it in the knee
and yeah Windows tries to balance all the cores
which doesn't work with more than 8
its quite techy
but basically windows gets brainfucled at threadripper high corecounts into epyc and doesnt know what to do with em
is latency Ryzen's biggest problem?
ultimately yes
single core is probably more noticeable though
even now there are not many programs that are using all the cores correctly, (even windows) so this means that a lot of times perf seems worse, not because the chip is worse but because its not being used correctly
a cheaper varient of the RTX 2080 has been leaked as the possible "gtx 1180"

just a rumor but rumors have been coming true quite a lot
i mean if amd comes true
and these 1100 series cards seem though possible, they seem like it could be made up by anyone
i dont know i feel amd chips though plausable are a bit out there, salt and all that
AMD leaks are completely fake
i know for sure they are not being released tomorrow
The one retailor that 'leaked' everything? You can add items to their pages or something like that so it was bullshit
that wasnt a retailer and that was after the leaks
Even then
People don't understand how node shrinks work
The smaller you go, leakage becomes a bigger and bigger issue
anyway ill say this, They are possibly true from what we have been told
but we will see tomorrow, i will say we are not getting anything other than showing off tomorrow though
the 1100 series seem more strange because of the branding, i feel it would be too confusing, especially if amd go for 3000 series branding
"nAvI iS jUsT a BiNnEd 480"
would but thats still seen as a Nvidia chip
Just like with the 590 launch, they will probably avoid the 600
its like when i had a r9 290
people said thats a old card.... they thought i meant the old nvidia card
People are idiots
^ that, they are
and a 280, and a 275, and a 260, and a 250, jesus nvidia how many products on one generation did you do
12 different products on one generation
Then add the different memory configurations and it makes the 1060 look weak
anyhow best be off to bed
AMD had the highest performing card at that time
man going from the GTX 280 to the 480 was the biggest jump in performance ever
for a generation
How do ya like this one then @sullen lichen
or should i switch to AMD and become a shillmaster
32GB of RAM is worthless for gaming
A 970 Pro is not worth the cost
PSU is still not worth $170
That 1080 is worth $400 not $670
Better performance
For $600 less
I bought it for 670 back in the day
I wanna get an i9, already got an i7 and a x299 build
I should get a 2080 eventually but might like a 2080 ti
and I like m2 drives, and want to have enough room on host OS disk for a bunch of stuff
moneys not a problem, if anything I wanna end up with 3-4 builds anyway
I went with a 16 gb 4400mhz ram build before and it sucked
So buy an M.2 SATA SSD
No reason to spent literally over double for something you won't use
i9 is an advertising point not a benchmark for performance
uh yeah if you mean from silicon lottery with the cheapest binned one
its gonna clock like dogshit
You don't buy a binned CPU from SL unless its the most expensive one due to them taking all the good bins for well, the expensive ones
I mean a 9900k hit 5.3ghz at like 1.33v and sold for $1800
depends how fast you clock it
uh no
lol good talk
The damage from electrons moving through something faster
cya dude
do you replace all the copper in your housing every 10 years?
copper? what is this 1970?
I find blatantly wrong claims by someone who clearly doesn't understand what they are talking about (Oh I already own a X299 system and want an i9, that is why my first build posted had an i7 X299 CPU) to be annoying
Uh yeah I meant power lines
Running a CPU faster is making more electrons flow through it (due to the nature of how clock cycles work)
but electrons do very little damage (quantum machines if you want to do that math) to anything, you don't replace power lines due to electrons damaging it
So why would you worry about a CPU being damaged the same way?

Tbh voltage and frequency are somewhat linked (if you ignore silicon lottery) so on the most basic of understandings then yes, forcing a CPU to clock higher will require more voltage and will make its lifespan shorter
yeah I would try to explainthat but they just seem full of salt
(quantum machines if you want to do that math)
all my lulll
Uh yeah
Electrons can randomly decide to be in a different location
its why sub 4nm CPUs probably won't happen
and the thing is, a lot of CPUs clock higher on stock (or barely above stock) voltages already
3nm is possible
it will just be a pain in the ass for researchers to develop
people were doubting that TSMC would be able to hit 7nm
but they are already putting R&D into 5nm

silicon atoms are only 0.2nm is size
K
asked someone about this earlier in a different chat but
peanuts vs coconuts
get one thats good
lend me your wisedom grim 
thsats gay
Hmmm

yeah
asked nyphon about it but I'd like more input
same comment about ASUS
cause they make rad mobos
But also the ASUS is only a B skew too
I don't know what that means 
I'd probs go gigabyte
asus says out of stock
If you have an unlocked CPU
Non K?
surprised you aren't waiting for next gen ryzen announcement tomorrow lol
Ah, then I'd not bother with the Z
Ryzen should at least cut prices
yeah
you know how intel is trying to cut out AMD?
making the 8700 the same price as the ryzen 2700x
All ryzen CPUs have their version of hyperthreading?
They do
it's called SMT
ahhh
my Ryzen 5 1600 has 6 cores and 12 threads
I see I see
paid $150 for it
Good price

I got a 2600 for my bro
2600 is around $160 now
mm
Building PC's is the best
yes
im going to make an all-white build
nzxt has some nice cases for white
Gigabyte has the best Z390 boards @lime pollen
yeah that's a yikes from me fam

I think I'm more excited for a new Raspberry Pi model than CES announcements
the day I can play gamecube games at 60 fps on a system the size of my palm, the day my PC collects dust

uh yeah I have a 8600k (@5.0ghz) and a 1080 and get a rock solid 120-140fps
I eel like that dude is playing at a higher resolution
oh wait >5 months ago 
See that is nice
Anyone know if Nvidia adding support for freesync will work on older models than the 10-series?
thing is, FreeSync will only be compatible through drivers and it will be only supported on 12 specific monitors
Acer XFA240
Acer XZ321Q
Acer xg270HU
Acer XV273K
Asus VG258Q
Asus MG278Q
Asus XG258
Asus XG248
Asus VG278Q
Agon AG241QG4
AOC G2590FX
BenQ XL2740
these specifically
They said you could enable it manually too, right?
freesync will most likely work according to specs given on monitor
But those 12 would be certified from the start
but will not have full gsync range that rated monitors get, or other quality issues
From what I understood freesync doesn't have the same standards on manufacturers as gsync, so perhaps they will go through monitors to see which ones would work and certify them
Yes that's the case
Those 12 will have it turned on by default BUT you will have the option to turn it on for all other freesync monitors with varying benefits apparently
just gimme drivers to tinker with it already
What was a little unclear to me was whether this was strictly for 10 and 20-series cards or whether e.g my 970 would have the feature (with varying benefits, like you said for monitors)
hype hype
ooo shit amd ces today
10 minutes
Watch AMD President and CEO Dr. Lisa Su's keynote at CES 2019 in Las Vegas, showcasing the diverse applications for new computing technologies with the poten...
7nm!
god damnit talk about gaming

you watching?
nothing relevant to us
where is the navi, where is ryzen 3xxx on desktop
^
30minutes in and not a word on those

guess they gonna summarize it in last 5min
right now it was an intro and they are just talking about the places amd is important
its the same as its been
they just talking about the areas like mobile or visual rendering that they effect
Sigh
phil spencer
sounds like they are starting with console first...
lmfao
"we have new x box with amd"
I wasn't expecting him
xbox two announced
or xbox one x2
did he just drop roblox?
his main competition for minecraft?

booo
tf
why

how you play bfv in there?
my point exactly, why
On vacation lol
why
Shit I think my internet just dropped again
on vacation, watches ces

the stream is really low quality and dropped few times :D
the stream im watching on youtube is solid
hasn't dropped at all
720p = solid?
i miss 360p
phil spencer talks a lot
360p master race
480p was where it was best
And hey CES is important
i think su is trying to get phil to shut up lol
Plus literally everyone here rn is on their phone or tablets
Dr Phil ain't gonna be quiet


Ikr
Old news
actually a joke
This is 2019
60fps is enough for everyone -Lisa Su, 2019
590 just binned 580s at stupid pwer draw
What are we, console gamers?
yea, thats what we deemed champion
how does amd fuck up so many times
lol
fucking finally

navis gonna be shit anyway
new gpu
gpus about to announce
i think im behind on the stream
nah realism
i expect amd to smash on on ryzen front
but navi is gonna be huge meh
fuck radeon software
the design on the card reminds of soviet union though
it's Vega, not navi
???????????
wheres ryzen and vega
ohh nvm i think im 2 minutes behind
imo they're just going to fucking gnome us and it's just going to be overclocked vega
its 7nm though...
you can't expect 2080 Ti performance whenever AMD budget in the GPU division is only 1/3rd of Nvidia

i dont?
I already got DMC5 from buying a rx 580 lol
100+ fps on ultra settings at 4k...
no framerate numbers
70-115
no more like 70-85 when he was fighting mobs
ah ddidnt see that part
100-120 when looking at empty landscape
my discord is on top left
they had image of benchmark on bfv 2080 vs r7 and both like 62fps
i want battelfield 5
ugh ubisoft
no one cares about mc5
dmc5?
ye
but it has what 16 gb of memory?
thats a pretty popular series
it wont be cheap
700-800usd
oof
watching 4k video in youtube at 720p 
^
ibet the cpu is in that controller
they smash controller in "anger" and reveals new cpu
lisa wants to chase that dude away
cuz u need 5ghz on a controller
he is using up her precious keynote time
people who played division 1 
everyone is watching it for ryzen
i got no time
free division 2 
no company reveals their best products in the start
no one expects hot stuff from gpu section
is this your first time watching CES?
hurthxhfguytsdhgiusyudthusydgy
did i miss the price for the gpu?
didnt hear it
nope
talk about cpu
@minor turret wut where was the price?
im just pulling a random number
i would bet 899 MSRP with it being 100-200 usd more expensive at launch
u
frame wates
wadeon
whats the recommended amount of dedotated wam for server
no fake
low settings make no diffrince
he said famewates lmao
suppowt
fake
120 fps on low settings is good
if all benchmarks are for 4k i wonder how much is down to better memory bandwidth with radeon 7
epicc gamers
699$ feb 7th for radeon 7 gpu
$699
comes with re2, dmc 5, and div 2
?
theyre selling amd stuff hard
they gonna sell intel stuff?
@unborn isle you fucked up bruh
lol rip
even with tax its 699 euro
its gonna be more from retail, maybe 800e in europe
there will be a cheaper variant thats actually priced "okay"
so for 700 you can get 1080ti perf with amd or for 700 you can get 1080ti perf with rtx with 2080?
you can have a 2080 with rtx and dlss for 700
here it comes
chrome browser
2080 msrp is 800
rip ram
and retailers want extra
i see 2080 on pcpartpicker atm for 700ish
720 for the cheapest i would actually get
probably a blower style
blower is 700
it will probably be on chromecast
2080 with blower will run at 90C
link blower
well that was a little underwhelming
unless fan is going all the way
they aren't even talking about the mid range
ik
670 for gigabyte 3 fan 2080
im 2 minutes behind on stream
ya right but if they're doing 2080 perf for 700 then i doubt they'll do 2070 perf for 250
cpuuuu?
vega different than navi
are they going to talk about navi here
vega is supposed to be their titan equivalent imo
i mean, titan perf in gaming and perf for creating at 700 is solid...
rip amd
no one wants epicc we want ryzen
ok lol
but i thought they love gamers??
http://i.4cdn.org/g/1547056221237.png i understand that they are prob going for temps
but that heatsink behind fans looks ugly af
looks like a normal heatsink lol
THIS IS SO EPIC
epycc
ryzen now?
ik after this?
๐คท
64 cores/128 thread Epyc CPU cheaper than a 28-core Xeon CPU
So

1 ghz on all cores lol
Wat
if i cared about server stuff epyc would be cool
its a joke
how is it a joke when the end result is 1 amd cpu is better than two intel cpus?
Is it?
:D?
according to the benchmark they just showed
Hn
"we put more cores in this thing"
Hm
im slow pn time
ONE MORE BIG THING
RYZEN
Ryzen
RYZEN
thyere still talking about epyc

WOKE UP
ITS ON RYZEN
7nm ryzen!
16cores, 1 turbo to 5ghz, rest 4ghz?
lol
pixelbrei
12 cores 5ghz i think
goodluck cooling that
๐ฏ
comparison benchmarks
3rd gen ryzen vs 9900k
oh cinebench
8c16t
7nm is 40% more power efficient than 12nm, 50% more than 14nm
cmon lets goooooooooooooo
im hoping is that this card is vega frontier
and that proper cheaper version comes out later
cinebench ryzen win with lower power draw
10
ryzen final speed tbd
TBD
i would be happy with 4.5 all core ๐

thats sad
classic
il just buy a 2700x
3months from first leaks and people are waiting for release still for about 6months+ 
next gen intel desktop will be 2020,no worries ๐
i mean... they are doing better than intel
i do hope so
Intel 10nm desktop CPUs come out 2020
no intel will improve solder and boost clocks even more for 10999k
intel said 10nm was coming out when? 2015?
mobile 10nm Q4 2019
ye,first roadmap was about 2015 ๐
and that was announced when?
in their wet dreams ๐
and we are bagging amd for doing all this within months?
inb4 amd stock price drops
bye
i'd be happy if amd gets ryzen q3 2019 on the market
welp, that was average
now throw the chips
anyone got screen cap of the cinebench that could be readable?
I mean it had no info on what exact spec the ryzen was
nah, didnt see that
they hid it
but it was slightly faster at about 30% less power
im guessing ryzen 5
there was the windows cpu graph
slightly ? sounds bad ๐ฆ
bc thats gotta be 8 cores
ik
then ryzen 7 will no have 12 cors
id bet the cpu they used was definitely cheaper than 9900k
so for being cheaper, being faster, with lower draw, we say "only"
navi when
"amd ??? sample 3rd gen ryzen"?
it's a 9900K boosting to turbo frequency vs a 3rd gen Ryzen early sample 8c/16t CPU
unless they are trying to deceive people
i guess 10nm intel will actually start to look interesting now
hey in 6months you can get 9900k's cheaper too
we just have to see whats cheaper when both are available
is it worth waiting 6 months?
10nm Intel mobile CPUs come out at the last quarter of this year
rx 3080 at 2070 performance hahaha
10nm desktop CPUs in 2020
depending on what you want
i didnt know adoredtv could fuck up that bad
theres no universal "yes its worth waiting" scenario
i thoought it was gonna be on febuary'
how did Adored fuck up?
i cant wait that long rip
9900k in summer?i don't wann melt on the pc ๐
do you really think amd is going to push out an rx 3080 for 250 dollars
i called 300-350
amd does not do charity
for the record
it will be competitive but not cheap
even at those prices they are undermining nvidia a shit ton
yea, just look at the price on r7
not when you realise turing is offering a lot more
its basically balanced to price out the 2080/1080ti variants
@storm osprey they do not considering you can get 2080 with tax for 680 euros
that includes 25% vat
they kept saying vega 7 was a creators card
so im comparing it vs titans
which it goes against, at much cheaper price
(seemingly)
when will we see navi?
dont think amd has that answer yet either
im sure it will be awesome for mining
and it will sell well for mining
and it will not go below msrp
mining a thing?
minecraft
but amd while it was available was the sweetspot
i really like amd but it looks like they're always trying to compete with the last generation
imo, thats not a bad idea
at least for gpu
they should essentially replace what "Gtx 12xx" series should be at the price it should be
Ok not read or seen it yet are we happy or sad?
i dont think they should've shown off their "content creation solution" for ces, i doubt many people will actually care
they should've talked about navi and the midrange, saved r7 for another keynote
so that part was sad
As expected, I'll have a watch in a bit
r7 looks good for its purpose, but that doesnt apply to consumers
they didn't show us specific Ryzen CPUs but they probably will in a few days time
nothing they've shown applies to consumers except ryzen gen 2 which was one cinebench run running slightly higher
they could've atleast oc'd it a little to match the i9's power usage
it would be interesting to see if the ryzen they put against 9900k was a r5
they did show ryzen in that racing game
if it were an r5 i think they would've made it clear it was
it likely was if the leaks about the higher core counts are true
but it was at 4k with v7 soo
fh4 was running at 1080p
1080p max yeah
it smells quite fishy they did not say what frequency the ryzen was running, just said "early sample, not final frequency"... so could have been running really high frequency, instead of final "consumer friendly" frequency
pretty much, but you're not really saving much
fh4 is pretty well optimised i think
@latent light they said ryzen cpus will be released mid2019
what im saying is how does that compare to their counterparts?
the devil may cry benchmark was a little fishy too, they only stayed in one section and moved the camera in a specific direction so it'd stay above 100
um
one sec lemme find some benchmarks
thanks dude, im at work so cant get too off track
mid 2019 is a good time to launch
their hype train died so i think they should've tried releasing sooner
release sooner so the drivers are bugged?
would have been better, usually is, but given intel released 9th gen recently this would have been good timing
if Intel launches a new gen this year it will be a refresh
intel could launch non soldered cpus with DIY liquid metal, so separated chip and spreader
although 10nm Intel mobile CPUs are rumored for Q4 2019
i guess intel wont be able to compete for 2019 but i was really only interested about navi
huh? wont be able to compete for 2019?
Navi is mid-range
i mean intel will lead at least HALF of the year with cpu perf in gaming
intel will lead in gaming perf probably for forever
more people care about price over raw performance
which is why Ryzen has been selling more than Intel since October
:P
Intel 9th gen IPC is only 8% ahead than Ryzen 2nd gen
polaris was really the only amd gpu launch i was really satisfied with
rx 480 was a beast
RX 480 was only $200 when it launched I think
yeah 200-250
if amd does the logical thing, they will do good, not in part to what they did, but mostly nvidia releasing rtx
for 970 performance
depends on the price on r7 on retail, its like 2080 but without rtx and dlss
so it all comes to how much do you value those
rx 3080 will have to be $400+
considering how the r7 is priced
that is, if the 3080 even offers faster performance than a vega 64
vega64 is like 1080?
but r7 is geared like the titan
so yeah, maybe they will release something like a replacement for vega 64 on 7nm
titan perf is same as 1080ti roughly
Vega 64 is equal/more than 1080 in DX12 and Vulkan API
its not the same thing comparing r7 to 2080
well if it is i think it was a bad move to advertise it as a gaming card
they didnt
i think it was a bad move to announce it at ces in general
they called it a creators card or something
creator and gaming solution or whatever
and said "i know that youre wondering about gaming" and showed that
its geared like the titan
"the creators" I took that like Nvidias "Founders edition"
like ive been saying
well i hope it is i guess
she said "for creators" at least 5 times in the Vega 7 announcement
^
but it comes with 3 games so
yeah, that is a plus for who wants those games
DMC5 will be fun
anyone hating on those games FOR FREE is a fool
i wouldnt buy them for more than 20 each personally
(hell even then i probably wont)
So uh
but its weird people try to spin those games as negatives
Anything big
nope
damn
carry on with your 9700k brah

good choice
Resident Evil 2 remake and Devil May Cry 5 are pretty exciting, the Division 2 is probably a flop
But still curious
vega 7 is taking on titan cards for much cheaper, ryzen 3 has nothing determined other than it seems ok for gaming, really good for workstations
but summa summarum, might get the 2080ti with waterblock, sell this msi trio 2080 and get both cpu+gpu water cooled and do some oc
Nice
this trio is too long for cases to fit reservoir properly 
Damn Haha
it looks like a reservoir that's the same size as a rad so

also has the aluminum fins
they should build water cooled rig with res space in the case itself
with rbg tubing
around the case






















































