#technology
1 messages · Page 166 of 1
yes
gigabyte memory support on Ryzen boards is garbage
noped out so hard
don't get gigabyte if you have ryzen
nice
yeah i can't remember what my build was at that time
just that i had an 8350
and i got rid of it ~1 year later
my only xp with amd
i bought an i5 back when they were 3 digit and it only lasted me like 1.5y
ive been a tad concerned id regret this 9700k some day but nothing should kill 8 cores until it's time to change out everything all over again
yeah
i mean i had my 4770k since it came out
so like ~5 years
not bad imo
so if my 9700k lasts me 5 years, $1000 for board/ram/cpu, its like $200/year
which isn't horrible
some people can spend $200 in one night at the bar 
i have zero faith AMD will release anything to destroy the 9700k
at best i see the 12c24t being comparable
3600X will probably
8 core/16 threads for only $230
5 GHz boost clock
Zen 2 isn't supposed to have any quad cores, 6 cores will be the minimum
so Ryzen 3 will have 6 cores
Ryzen 5 with 8 cores
IPC will be ahead of intel too because there will be 13% minimum increase in IPC over Zen+
Zen+ is 5-8% lower than Intel 9th gen
you gotta know that Ryzen only came out in 2017, there is many improvements and optimization that can take place for every new gen
i mean, CPU enhancements over the last 6 years have been mediocre
i technically could have continued to use my 2012 i7 4c8t
Ryzen 3 is just a boost clock increase over 2 and IPC?
Intel's IPC has only increased by 10% since 2012
next gen Ryzen 3 will be comparable to 2nd gen Ryzen 5
core counts will be the same
we will probably see a Ryzen 3 3300 for only $100 with 6 cores/12 threads and 4 GHz boost clock
Ryzen 5 3600 will be 8 cores/12 threads, around 4.4GHz boost
for $180
im just going to be curious what comes in at $350
3600X will be 4.8 GHz boost for $230
I mean, at this point my 2070 would be a bottleneck so it wouldnt matter
possible 5 GHz boost on single core
this pairing 2070 + 9700k is pretty spot on for 1440p gaming
$350 will be the Ryzen 7 3700X with 12 cores/24 threads and 5 GHz boost
5 GHz on single core I bet
might be 2 idk
Ryzen 5 will be the sweet spot
8c/16t
Ryzen 7 will have a TDP of around 105W
Ryzen 5 95W on the 3600X
65W on the 3600
9700k doesn't turbo to 5.0ghz across all cores
Also TDP means jackshit, who uses a CPU at base frequency?
Also a 2070 will struggle with 1440p, I would recommend a 1080ti / 2080 at a minimum for 1440p 144hz that isn't relying on gsync
9700K does 4.6 ghz boost all cores
Thing is, Zen2 will close the gap between Intel and AMD for gaming to the point it doesn't matter unless you are aiming for ultra high refresh rates
The only thing holding back Zen+ right now is clocks and IPC, and both are improving (even if not to the extend of leaks) enough that price to performance will be what kills Intel
Because lets be real, the 9700k should be like
$300
tops
LOL, nothing is going to "kill Intel"... their patent portfolio alone will keep it around just like Motorola.
And Qualcomm.
Uh
You do realize that AMD and Intel have agreements on patents?
Intel can't stifle competition via patents, they already tried to kill AMD and lost a shit load of money
Motorola is used for a lot of government jobs iirc
Qualcomm produces a lot of networking stuff, and mobile devices, and other things people don't realize
Intel had to pay $1.45 billion to the EU for trying to kill AMD competition in the prebuilt desktop market
Who cares? Not relevant to the fact that Intel is way more entrenched in their patent farm than any of their competitors. Whether they have any deals or not, doesn't mean squat, because if they don't made headway in one area, they can concentrate their R&D in another. AMD on the other hand NEEDs the consumer marketplace to stay competitive.
Intel will lose a lot of market share
EYPC 2 is shitting on Intel's current Xeon CPUs
AMD has gained a lot of marketshare
and server CPUs is where the money is at
Not far from intel
The DIY market for Intel and AMD is not how they make money
😄
EYPC 2 is bringing the first 64c CPU to the market
While Intel was like
"Guys we overclocked an already existing processor with a phase changer"
EYPC 2 is gonna have PCIe 4.0
While Intel can't even get their 10nm node to work after 5+ years
You made a statement, that AMD could kill Intel, and that's just not the case.
Yet they can
Plenty of other businesses have died from poor business decisions
Your scope of reference is way too small on this.
Take Sears

Didn't innovate
Sears is a meme
died
True
Intel is nowhere near the ineptitude of Sears.
Also true
yeah sears was bigger
Plus
Epyc 64 core/128 thread CPU for the same price as a 28 core Intel Xeon
They had no competition
Huh?
Sears had tons of competition
They had plenty of competition.
Intels only competition is AMD
you know some of those Ryzen 2 leaks were totally made up
Sears could have been what Amazon is now
Well
easily
Apparently their supply chain was horrendous
It would take a biblical-level of fuckup for Intel to go under.
I read somewhere that even if they did go online
It won't be quickly
B I B L I C A L
They still wouldve failed
Sears would never have had 2 day shipping
Amazon revolutionized supply chain
And yes they might lose market share
Amazon lost a shit load of money with prime to do that
Doesnt mean theyll go under
Zen 2 leaks are accurate speculation from sources that got Intel 9th gen, Zen+, Threadripper 2 and RTX 2000 series accurate months before announcement
I mean
Gotta lose money to grow
I'm waiting for my 9900k to do 5.2ghz on air
You're equating losing marketshare to the downfall of a company, and that's not the case. That's not economic theory at all. 🤦
I'm sure the Zen 2 leaks are atleast 90% accurate
Especially when it's like going from 90% market share to 80%
(No stats, just an assumption)
@rough gulch Well I would love it would turn out at 90% truth
I would be all in swapping my 2700x for an 3700x
CPUs cost a shit load of money to create (See the billions into 10nm)
So if Intel loses enough market share, and large companies switch to AMD for server CPUs. Intel will have to reduce spending somehow to continue to pay for R&D, you can already see Intel changing its focus when it cut DIY CPU production for mobile CPUs
and Intel's innovation has been less than stellar
sigh...
Okay guy, no debating it with you. DM me when Intel goes under. I'll buy the round.
Well nobody wins if either one goes under
Competition is what we should hope for
Plenty of companies do
Intel has a ton of patents it really shouldn't
Ayy
Just like every company ever
and while Intel does have a cross-licensing agreement with AMD
It kills other companies from coming into some markets
Intel isn't as corrupt with competition as they used to be
Qualcomm can't create an x86 CPU due to Intel's patent, and they will probably step on some of AMD's patents to create one anyway
New tv arrives in two days cant wait
throughout the 90s and early 2000s, Intel was paying retailers to not sell AMD products which is why the EU fined them $1.45 billion
AMD even had better processors at the time
in 2005 Japan issued sanctions against Intel for being anti-competitive lmao
Oh my
Intel is saying Qualcomm is anti competitive
With how they handled Apple's patent infringement in China
The irony 
Intel tried to hide their court dates from the public
google patent "Intel"
219,000 results oof
Articles from 2013 through today show AMD has been a mess since the early-to-mid 2000s and the marketplace isn't getting much easier for their survival. (RE: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/04/the-rise-and-fall-of-amd-how-an-underdog-stuck-it-to-intel and https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/04/amd-on-ropes-from-the-top-of-the-mountain-to-the-deepest-valleys/ among others). They're not doing as well as has been represented here. In fact, they peaked in early 2018. Attached is the five-year performance of their brand.
Intel on the other hand...
Can't fight the math.

I find it funny that the 2990WX destroys the 7980XE in some workloads 
Windows 10 NUMA support holds back the 2990WX
There will never be one CPU to rule them all
🎤 drop.
So comparing Intel vs AMD's top CPU means nothing
Intel can't compete with AMD for pricing
Neither can Dodge vs Ford, but one makes quality products and the other makes Fords.
they probably could but they'd throw a tantrum if they started making less profit
Also Intel has a lot more products that hold it up
When was the last time you saw an AMD network chip?
It doesn't mean anything. LOL
The 7980XE beats the 2990WX in memory bandwidth sensitive workloads that don't scale well with core count and prefer clock speed
The 2990WX destroys the 7980XE in anything that prefers straight cores over clock speed and isn't memory sensitive
2990WX underclocked to around 2.8-3.0 GHz would be a nice server cpu
Threadripper are just EYPC CPUs anyways
at the price of enthusiast level CPUs lol
You can keep Googling whatever you'd like in the tangential arguments, it's not going to change the fact that Intel isn't going under and by the margins, is not even worried about AMD in the long-term. The math doesn't support it.
AMD server marketshare is growing pretty quickly
It was obviously thrown together to beat Rzyen
lmao why did Intel release 2 generations in a 8 month period and increase core counts for the 8th gen if they aren't worried about AMD
Illuminati not confirmed.
It seemed like 4c 8t CPUs sold fine
They did for like
7 generations?
dunno too lazy to check
Then Rzyen shows up
and Intel releases a main stream 6c 12t CPU on LGA 1151
Which it said was impossible at one point
Then a 8c 16t CPU on the same socket

but no
Intel doesn't have to worry about AMD
They just decided to 'innovate' for the shits and giggles
do you think Ryzen 9 at 16 cores will work on AM4

supposed to be a 2 chiplet design
It should
Der8auer has a new video showing how the pins can handle a lot more current than given
I guess it's not possible at the moment to put more than 8 cores on a single die
or chiplet
not die
7980XE is one die
forgot how many pins are on AM4
It just uses a mesh
AM4 - 1331 pins
what is PCI-E 4.0 on next gen supposed to bring
Zen 2 so far is confirmed to have:
- Higher core counts
- Higher frequency
- Higher memory support
- Lower Latency
- Refinement
So last night I was looking online trying to figure out if the Turtlebeach Elite Pro Tournament headset I have is CTIA or OMTP compliant. Anyone know? Because it will matter on what kind of splitter I buy for the PC mic/headphone ports versus the $30 one from TB themselves.
Ideally, I want to use the same headset between the XB1 and the PC.
and considering bandwidth is the holy limiter to storage speeds and some server usages 
I think there are server motherboards with x32 slots
Xbox got no exclusives

meh PS4 exclusives don't grab my attention
more cutscenes than actual gameplay
interactive movies
I mainly like single player games that are in the RPG category
Borderlands, fallout, elder scrolls, bioshock, ect.
@latent light Confirmed by who
If you say AMD have a source ready
preferably one that isn't a video
Are they any good CPU like the 7820x 8Core ?? Right now ?? or in the future ???
i overclock my 7820 to 4.7GHZ per Core
CES announcement is less than 2 weeks away which is when AMD unveils all of their products for this year
@buoyant rover you do realize most leaks in the past 3 years have been precise and correct in detail
I wouldn't deny the Zen 2 leaks considering Wccftech, Videocardz and Techradar have had all of their previous leaks for Ryzen, Nvidia and Intel atleast 90% accurate
they predicted RTX 2000 series all the way back in July lmfao
and got the CUDA core count, memory type, memory size and bandwidth all right
9th gen leaks were not accurate
Wccftech
Shit source
Still waiting for my 9900k to do 5.2ghz on air
Leaks said it would
Plenty of leaks regarding the PC world turn out to be false
I'm going to wait and see and not try to say X is happening or Y is expected
who said 9900k would do 5.2 ghz on air
all i found was this
but it's a 9600k

It was one of the china leaks
That would take me ages to dig up
tldr someone supposedly got an engineering sample and pushed it really high without much effort "due to the sTIM"
as we found out
was straight bullshit, 9900k over 1.3v thermal throttles without some hardcore cooling
didn't they use some motherboard that no one has access to and they used a freezer or something to cool it
They used a Dominus Extreme IIRC
and yeah a phase changer cooler
To push it well below ambient
Different motherboard then
32 power phases
I don't think anyone got close enough to see the controllers to check if its a true 32 phase
or doubled
Since there have been doubled 32 phase consumer boards before
Intel's demo didn't tell the full story. Many in the press mistakenly assumed the new processor runs at 5.0 GHz at stock settings, but we carefully analyzed video from the event and spotted a few obvious signs that the processor was overclocked. Intel was apparently running some sort of closed-loop cooling that required insulating material around the tubing. This turns out to be a water chiller hidden under the table. As expected, all of the components are properly shielded to avoid excess condensation from the chilled liquid.
The one-horsepower Hailea HC-1000B is a beefy water chiller that can dissipate tremendous amounts of waste heat, but it also requires more than 1,000W for operation. We were originally going to witness the demo first hand, but there wasn't enough power handy to run both the chiller and the system simultaneously.

A water chiller that beefy is pretty much a phase changer
I can't find specs on the chiller
but yeah that CPU is pulling 7980XE on LN2 levels of power
what year do you think we will be able to cool 28-cores at 5GHz on a basic AIO lmao
oof
Efficiency gains aren't going to be that big
and that is most likely above a safe daily voltage
CPU technology has to change
Getting a 7980XE to 5.0ghz takes a lot of voltage
Man I don't even want to know what the mesh connecting all the cores was drawing for all that
any pc nerds here? i was trying to fix ram issues but i messed up some stuff, while i fixed most of the crashes Im still getting pagefile issues, I set all the drives to "system managed" (win7) how you guys set the pagefile?
pagefault in a non-paged area BSOD? or whatever its called
If that is happening, then up your CPU voltage or drop your CPU overclock
I doubt you messed up the page file, since that is just selecting the drive and it should default to your OS drive
Wow
Anyone into 3d printing?
Wassup whatever your name was before you changed it
Yes my boy
Yeah u know what
New year new me
I didnt actually make this my nickname btw
A mod/admin set it
🤷
I just rolled with it
Judge cockman
This is the new me
O.o
@latent light at least you get options at all
asrock low end boards give only control over base voltage
is it better to have a dynamic voltage offset than a static one?
I feel like dynamic will tone down the voltage whenever not doing something task heavy
That's what it does
I think Dynamic Vcore SOC is for RAM because when I increased it, my memory overclock became stable
DRAM does have a static voltage option but CPU doesn't which is weird
guys is the HS60 and HS70 same but HS60 is wired ?
if yes I'll get the HS60 cause it is literally half the price
I'm talking about corsair headset
HS70 has 7.1 surround I think
it is written that HS60 has too
wait they both do
Yeah
I just checked on amazon
CORSAIR HS60 – 7.1 Virtual Surround Sound PC Gaming Head
hs60 is wired, 3.5mm jack by default but comes with a USB adapter for 7.1 surround
HS70 is wireless and bluetooth
The USB adapter works on Ps4?
ps4 doesn't have 7.1 surround support I don't think
PS4 only supports 7.1 via HDMI which means you need an actual surround speaker system and not a surround headset
ah I see
@prime jasper what ryzen 7 is it
2700x
get a B450 if you don't want to have the chance of going through bios update
also you'd have to wait a week until AMD shipped a AM4 CPU to you so you could update the bios
B450 would be better if you want instant out-of-the-box compatibility
ok ty
I got my B350 board like 3 months after Ryzen 2000 series came out, didn't have the bios updated for 2nd gen
but it didn't matter because I have a 1600
theres a 1080 used on amazon should i trust it goes ffor 500
500 USD?
MSI Armor get pretty hot
should i get it or nah?
prob not
it will run over 80C most of the time with that cooler
that cooler is better fitted on a 1060 lol
lol
you see any 2070 deals
leme say
seee
but i limitid bc im shiping to isreal
2070 for 550
oof plus 15o $ for shipping for me
150*
wtf lol
ehh idk
im buying liquid cooling
AIO cooler?
ye
if i need to
wait another week, next gen Ryzen announcement
I think on the 10th
of this month
you'll probably see much better value by then
ok
btw
i wana make yt vids on bf2 do u recommend an editting program?
@ me what u recommend ima go record bf2

anyone use admin centre o365?
r7 2700x > i5 9600k
@thick mist @narrow meadow https://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/battlefield-v-test-gpu-cpu-2018
@latent light what’s wrong with no backplate? It’s not like they help cooling
\
it's a structural thing right?
I like big backplates and I can not lie, You other brothers can't deny
I have one last small question..which is better Corsair HS60 or HyperX Cloud Stinger
Keep in mind I'm on Ps4 and dont need sorround noise
@keen forge It helps with cooling
If they are well
connected to the mosfets
Most companies forgo any kind of thermal pad between the PCB and backplate
Also if you are buying a 2070
Spend the extra $50 and get a binned one
It will overclock (and boost automatically out of the box) much higher
Backplate doesn’t affect cooling
It easily can
VRMs are sometimes stuck on the back of cards and should be connected to the backplate if it exists, but most companies are cheap and don't include $2 in thermal pads
That wasn’t the point - that’s not what comes stock
You said backplate doesn't affect cooling
Not "Stock backplate doesn't affect cooling"
and anyways no one has actually done proper tests on PCB temps
The conversation was about stock back plates
Anyone can stick a piece of metal to their GPU with thermal pads, that’s not what you get when you buy tho
and I know my GPU backplate is doing something for heat at stock
because it gets fucking hot
and its not magically producing its own heat
My case gets hot - is not exactly improving my thermal performance
more fans
I’ve ordered a new case and more fans already
Meshify C + excessive amount of fans = fine airflow
but i really should add more exhaust fans, the issue is I can't without fucking up my radiator
or it will just choke itself on its own hot air
My case doesn’t technically support my rad, I drilled a couple holes to get it to work
I might do that
It has the mounting holes for a 280mm rad
but doesn't technically support it
It doesn’t look too good, wouldn’t recommend
backplates do cool
@steep gust are 2mm thermal pads too thick?
I see 0.5mm, 1mm, 1.5mm and 2mm
holy shit aliaz switches are awesome
FUUCK THESE SWITCHES
what switches
Eh
Too thick might be bad
But like 0.5mm off shouldn't do anything bad since they do compress
quiet as a membrane?
pretty fucking close if i had to guess
like, i dont bottom out when i type, and i can really only hear the leaflet getting depressed
7,8,9 are Aliaz 80g's; 4,5,6 are Aliaz 70g's; 1,2 are Aliaz 60g's; 3 is Aliaz 100g. Numpad delete to the right is MX Clear while the other delete is Zealios ...

yes you need it for that, but you dont need it to the max
over clock ur i9 9700k to the max with no cooler and use a fire extinguisher
bbtw im being sarcastic
oof
im gonna get a i5 9600k
im geting an aio
oof
died
1500?
1700
i can find an rtx 2070 for 500
yeh i know me to thats why i have this pc now
Don't get a 9600k
Wait literally a week
For CES 2019
Zen 2 will most likely shit bricks on Intel for price to performance
but will they get realeasd the same day?
im short on time
??
me?
sorry rn i run on an athilon apu
At least the 9600k is a bad investment
gouat
2700x?
omg

Sunny Cove will not support Z390

hmm k
ok ty forthe help
I mean
If you made this long on an athilon
I feel like you could wait a little longer for Zen 2
Just to see
ye ok
if a ryzen 7 3600x is the same as the 2700x i might buy
or a better for the same price
i think i can wait till feb
next gen Ryzen should be able to do 5 GHz
even 5?
just like im stoked on these aliaz switches
yeah just as boost
5 GHz boost on 1-2 cores should mean 5.1-5.2 GHz all core overclocks
uh no
"uh no"
i think ryzen 3 wil do 3.9
all you ever say
The 2700x can get up to like 4.3ghz across all cores

Can you do
4.4ghz on a 2700x?
Hell no
That would take some hardcore silicon lottery
4.2 maybe
no lol
idk
4.3ghz is considered golden for a 2700x
7.3
I heard of 1300X going to 4 GHz but no higher
lol
AMD isn't going to add a gigahertz of frequency just by a node shrink
Epyc will have 64 cores this next gen
The record 2990WX frequency is 6.0ghz
1 core?
I think HWBot requires all cores
how can you get 32 to 6 ghz lmao
Its not stable in anything
did it boot though
duh

160 digreees
Since most motherboards freak the fuck out with the sensors once under LN2
melt iron with ur 32 core 6 ghz cpu
what's the highest oc on a 2700x
Der8auer took a 2700x to 5.6ghz for the Cinebench record with LN2
he got it to do a cinebench run wtf
If you think just going to 7nm will let AMD push a 3700x to 5.2ghz across all cores with safe voltages, you will be very disappointed
We don't know
AMD has said nothing
People are guessing around 10-15% IPC improvements, and I can see 10%
But the claims of >15% IPC improvements are bullshit, lets be real
idk how over 10% IPC improvement could happen in 1 new gen lol
AMD said themselves 19% higher IPC than first gen Ryzen
youtubers are saying 13-15%
i say we just wait lol
wait not 29%
19% sounds reasonable
3% @storm osprey
Ultimately, the changes in Zen+ resulted in a 3% improvement in IPC over Zen; which in conjunction with 6% higher clock speeds resulted in up to 10% overall increase in performance
10% sounds reasonable
Which is normal considering Zen+ was a refresh
15% slightly less
and just moving to 12nm
Intel normally does 1-3% IPC improvements per generation
and lets be real, everyone was expecting Intel to have 10nm products at least in the pipeline
Not Skylake for the third time
well, lets not use intel as a baseline, they basically had a monopoly and could put out little shit like that
how long has 10nm been in development
Since like
I first heard about 10nm in 2015
Zen was being worked on right after Piledriver
lol
2012 was 32nm I think for Intel and AMD
Ivy Bridge was 22nm in 2011
Man 10nm has been "next year" for literally half a decade
TSMC is ahead of Intel lol
TSMC also isn't trying to use old fabrication techniques to get 10nm
Intel has fabs in the USA, Israel, China and Canada
Samsung has a working 7nm EUV node
So does TSMC
Intel is trying to use immersion lithography IIRC
3 in Ireland
TSMC has one in USA
that's a random location
but its most likely a research fab
damn there is so many TSMC fabs in Taiwan
and they got 1 in china and 1 in USA
2 in china*
Intel fab 42 is going to cost $5-7 billion and starts production in 2020
GlobalFoundries has a fab plant that costed $6.8 billion

was made in 2016
TSMC has the most expensive one at $9 billion that was made in 2016

and they have one expected to be $20 billion in the future

and a $17 billion one in 2020
currently under construction
TSMC is worth a lot
since they make AMD and Nvidia chips
Intel is also worth a lot
AMD did claim that Zen 2 will have 29% higher IPC than Zen

AMD (NASDAQ: AMD) today demonstrated its total commitment to datacenter computing innovation at its Next Horizon event in San Francisco by detailing its upcoming 7nm compute and graphics product portfolio designed to extend the capabilities of the modern datacenter.
"Estimated increase in instructions per cycle (IPC) is based on AMD internal testing for “Zen 2” across microbenchmarks, measured at 4.53 IPC for DKERN +RSA compared to prior “Zen 1” generation CPU (measured at 3.5 IPC for DKERN + RSA) using combined floating point and integer benchmarks."

For a specific workload
which is likely true
not a blanket 29% ipc increase
also rumours about amd going 16 cores means rip 5 ghz 
The 9900k at 5.0ghz across all cores gets toasty so if y'all make a big deal of the 3700x not hitting 5.0ghz across all cores then 

any CPU that can hit 5 GHz on a single core boost should be able to manually overclock all cores to 5 GHz

inb4 we get 16 cores 3.8-3.9ghz and 6/8 core at 4.4
with maybe boosting 1-2 cores to 4.5-4.6 ghz with pbo
not too long ago Intel users were saying all you need is 4 cores for gaming
now 6-8 cores is mainstream which AMD implemented before them
before Ryzen though 8 core AMD CPUs were pretty bad
can confirm
did have fx series cpu
did not work with a powerful gpu, would get a slight bottleneck
to be fair I plugged a GTX 1070 in with it
Fx-8350 would bottleneck a 1060 unless you overclocked it to 4.5+ GHz
#stock-cooler-lyfe
@latent light this is true, when next gen consoles get released
inb4 gta 6 is released and it doesn't come to pc for like 4 years
if so, holidays 2020 release LUL
didn't GTA 5 come to pc 1 year after it came out
I thought it was 3
came out in april 2015 on steam
so it came out on pc a year and half after it came out on xbox 360 and ps3
it came out on xbox one and ps4 in late 2014 I think
console users have to experience game breaking bugs, we don't
we experience PC chat
even gta 5 optimization was shit on pc when it came out
Consoles have AMDs dogshit old 8 core
why arent console games optimized for 8 cores then?
a lot are
the single thread performance on jaguar must be terrible
I thought they were
which is why Battlefield games are 60 fps on xbox one and ps4
AMD Jaguar CPUs are 28nm and have IPC identical to Bulldozer architecture
problem is that the CPUs are clocked low
basically take an Fx-8150 and underclock it to 2 GHz
basically a Jaguar CPU in terms of performance
and yet some ported console games are terrible at utilizing multiple threads
consoles architecture is way different
last gen is x86 aint it?
That is similar to the base of FX
Console games are built around the hardware
and the games that do run on console are pretty impressive
I played BF1 on the release xbox one, game looked and played good
think it was 900p 60 fps with good anti-aliasing
because it didn't look pixelated on a 60" 1080p TV
and the graphics looked identical to medium settings on PC
I remember when BF4 came out and it looked like shit on the xbox one because it was 720p with no AA present
aliaz switches are the shit
Find amazing deals on GreenManGaming at https://lmg.gg/GreenManGaming Twitter: http://twitter.com/TechLinkedYT Instagram: http://instagram.com/TechLinkedYT F...

Linus is believing the Ryzen leaks
It's not going to be a disappointment tbh
VideoCardz leaks came up today which is only a week away from the CES announcement in Las Vegas
I'm sure the leaks are true
hey i have a GeForce GTX 1050Ti in my PC. And a intel i7 7700. now, everything is laggy like graphics lag. i dont know why.
8gb ram
on my laptop with a 1050 2GB it runs much better
well not much, but better
ive disabled all extra effects, set to low latency graphics settings
but still its a bit laggy
a 1050ti isnt very powerful
but the laptop i use
has 1050
and Ti is better
still the laptop performs better
im going crazy i keep lagging
once an nme runs across the screen
and i turn
everything hangs
and i cant aim
bewm down
cries
The latest GDDR6 memory standard, currently implemented by NVIDIA in its GeForce RTX 20-series graphics cards, pulls great premium. According to a 3DCenter.org report citing list-prices sourced from electronics components wholeseller DigiKey, 14 Gbps GDDR6 memory chips from M...
GDDR6 is pretty expensive

yay i got it fixed. used optimization from nvidia experience. it somehow ... disabled or change dsomething that fixed the lag.
;D
u should upgrade to a 1060 down the line
Why not a 2080ti? 
@plain quiver I have a 1050Ti in the PC, not a laptop, don't have those issues.
my brother is saying apu beats cpus in gaming lmao bc apus have graphics and help the gpu
like a i5 9600k and the ryzen 7 2700x
Well price perf for a low end PC APU's are best
It beats a low end normal CPU and like a 1050 for sure
he is saying bc i5 9600k has intigrated graphics its gives more fps in games then the ryzen7200x both with a graphics card ofc
*than
ye ty im bad at spelling
As a mod do you have perms to edit peeps messages?
the integrated gpu is not used if you dont use it
@lofty light We can do all sorts of nifty things. 😃
intel is actually releasing 9th gen chips without gpu for less price, 9600KF, 9700KF, 9900KF
I should become a mod to edit peeps messages and correct their spelling 😉
*yaeh
get a 720p monitor for secondary
and 60 hz
unless ur gaming on both for some reason
hmm k
but if u want a thrid monitor make sure its 720p
bc then u will waste money'
my ocd says no
oof
people using 144hz monitors just for discord though, is like 
ppl need to see tha
smoothly
and then they have 1080p and 150-200% res scale on windows
ppl like the typing thing
just get a laptop for discord 
I have the 49" samsung
kool
i have the cheapo hp
60hz
we want 620hz already
more hz over 200 is usless
on a 4k screen
make sure they look the same
it depends what you are doing with the second screen
if you are just showing "static" content, 144hz burns through it faster
if u wana browse the webs use ur phone as a second screen lol
but you can always limit it to 60hz too, if 60 or 144 is nearly the same price point. Also there are some inconvenies when using 144+60 mixed
lol
get a spectere or somthin
i wonder what happends when u get curved ultra windes in a cirlcile
u need an O shaped desk
and somhow get in
the mid
@prime jasper if you have intel cpu with integrated graphics, you could get 60hz display and plug it into the motherboard hdmi, that way it would not interfere at all with your gaming 144hz
sadly
get a cheap video cards of of ebay
or just use ur damn graphics card and plug in 2 monitors
problem is 144hz and 60hz dont sync, 120 and 60 "sync"
i can barley afford a 1 inch screen oof
then get worse response time
i dont think reddit needs 1ms response time
hmm
then stick with the benq
Has the BENQ been good? Had some of those at work.
wait
u had a 120hz one
so use that
oh oof
do u want better cpu or monitor
u could opt for a cheap one then save up later
for a better monitor
get ryzen they always use same chipset
so ez upgrades
lmao
it is
u need to upgrade to a new motherboard
I think the 4770 + 1070 is good balance
ehh idk
I mean 4770k can bottleneck 2080ti on ultra
Amd 
mainly games with the Unreal Engine like Fortnite, PUBG, WW3
RX 580 stomps the 1060 in most games
im planning to get a 1070 and a 2700x
wait a week and get a 3600X
ik
it will be sub $230
noice
you really think you can get those new ryzens this month 
there would be already leaked videos and benchmarks if they were coming
they are doing this launch exactly like first gen ryzen launch
launch right after CES
will ryzen 3600x beat intel in gaming?
bc ryzen looks like for gaming and intel looks like for workstations but exactly the opisite
well, considering Intel 9th gen IPC is only 8% ahead of Ryzen 2000 series and 3000 series is supposed to have 13-15% higher IPC than 2000
it should be ahead of current intel
ryzen 7 series was announced dec 13, 2016 and launched feb 22, 2017, not quite immediately
its gonna take months before you can get those new chips, and most likely not the flag ships until they get them optimized
moooonths
I say the 3700x or what was the best, is available in like late august tops
Flagships always launch first and the low end launches last
Ryzen 7 launches first always
well Ryzen 7 and 5 launch together
same goes for intel and nvidia
they launch the high-end first
the last products of the next gen to launch are the APUs which will come out Q3
still its gonna take long time from the "launch" or "announcement" in CES, until you get any of the new lineup
cant wait to see the new athilon apus
there may not be new athlon cpus
they have done me good
there was athlon cpus launched like a month ago
Athlon 200GE, 220GE and 240GE
with Vega 3 graphics
ik
but i dont think it affects performance
if i dont have a gsync monitor if i get more hen 60 fps on games will it lag?
then
60hz btw
much better
G-sync and FreeSync makes lower framerates look smooth and also help with stuttering and screen tearing
oh ok
G-sync monitors cost $100+ more than FreeSync
G-sync is used by Nvidia
FreeSync for AMD and soon to be Intel graphics cards
wut
Freesync 2 is out
I had freesync1 and its not that good
hello my game is not saving and i tried to delete the PROSAVE file and rename the PROSAVE_tmp it worked one time but then not. anybody can help me plz?
try to uninstall and reinstall the game




