#technology
1 messages · Page 161 of 1
i mean, that shouldnt be a problem in anything other than bfv
but bfv is an outlier
storage doesn't come with SATA cables
Anyone here on pc have an issue where it like the character slows down for a second and then everything works again?
My framerate is usually in the 100s as well
i have that at the beginning of games or when i just spawn in
Dang, it only occurs for me while I'm playing and randomly
very rarely does it happen when im in the middle of a game
i mean, spawning in is in the middle of it
but that seems to be the only time it happens
Okay cool glad I'm not the only one haha
Thanks!
It does occur more towards the beginning of games now that i think about it
Anyone have curved monitors for their setup?
I have the aw 34 monitor that's slightly curved
yea i wouldnt get curved unless i was getting into 30"+ screens
Looking at. 27” curved Samsung at the moment
I dunno my old monitor was 27 inch g sync dell one that goes on sale often and that was good enough
Not sure if you need a curved display at that size
dell s2716dg
The 24” isn’t curved, but 27” is
Yep that's the model haha
24” seems a bit small for me.
i highly recommend the dell s2716dg
1080p as I have been using an LED television for awhile as a dual purpose for the guest room where the system lives.
just get one of those huge 40" monitors and run 2 games at once
I’ve got a secondary Sony monitor next to it.
if youre main purpose is gaming, get the dell
If your gpu is good enough for 1440p,that Dell model he suggested is great
gsync is incredible
Haha I have had several g sync monitors but always leave it off
There's input lag I feel when it's on
I have a 1050Ti in the system at the moment
And framerates go down quite a bit from my experience with it on
it increases input lag by like 13 ms or something like that
fps shouldnt be affected
i use mine for gaming and havent had problems
1440p and gsync
I might just buy another TV then since there isn’t much selection here
I think some newer games idk if it's a bug with game or gpu but I noticed my framerate went down with it on
A TV has more input lag though compared to a monitor
That’s true, but since the room is dual purpose, having a TV in there isn’t a bad gig.
A 4-series 32” Samsung goes for $199
Sorry, 5-series
4-series is $169
And if you are playing battlefield with the 1050ti,i would stick to 1080p for more frames
SF350 24” Monitor goes for $169
gsync shouldn't be adding input lag or reducing FPS
Ohhh
gsync does increase input lag, but shouldnt reduce fps
They have the MSI optix mag27C here oddly enough
but a noticeable amount, no
Generally the advantages out weight the dis-advantages
right, as i said and iirc input gsync increases input lag by 13ms
it was something that was very, very, very minor
also monitor response time is meaningless
Haven’t seen this before
Let me test later then as I've always left it off for battlefield but I know some games it dropped or capped my fps when I enabled g sync, could be a bug with the game itself though
Another possibility
That’s a g-sync/240Hz Monitor
The only other options here are Acer monitors, and they have plenty of those in stock
It’ll run, just not great. But, would be future proofing for the upgrade in 2019.
1440p 144hz > 1080p 240hz
For bfv 240fps, get 2x 2080ti, ez
i pref resolution
getting rid of jaggies is awesome
though 24" 1080p isnt far off in ppi compared to 27" 1440p
guys what is your opinion about those three monitors Acer Predator XB271HUA - Asus Rog Swift PG278QR and Dell S2716DG ? I am thinking of picking one of those for Gsync and 1440p 144hz i would like your opinion if possible as i am reading too many comments on internet people complaining about almost every monitor...
IF these are the monitors im thinking of, the dell is way cheaper but only slightly worse
you can get the dell commonly for 350
On my country the have the same price all of those
so i am about which one i should pick
i play bfv atm 1080p with 1080ti so i was thinking of moving to 1440p as my graphic card is good enough and i play moba and mmo games also
if they are the same price i would get the asus rog
here its always the most expensive
I would get the one with best colors
Check them yourself
oh and if one is ips then get that one
i wouldnt trust that, the dell has SHIT calibration out of box
They all use the same panel
none of them are ips
right, id go asus
I wouldn't go Asus just because it cost more normally
normally, but he said its the same price
it's impossible to notice the difference between a 5ms and 1ms monitor
it's snake oil
@sonic osprey SLI sucks in Battlefield, although average fps is higher, it sees more frametime spikes than a single card
which means more stutter
GPU's Used Nvidia RTX 2080 TI Founders Edition Asus GTX 1080 TI Founders Edition Asus GTX 1080 Founders Edition CPU - Coffee Lake 8700K CPU Cooler - Corsair ...
look at the frametime graph
sli sucks in general
game devs don't care about SLI/crossfire anymore which is sad
frametime spikes are fine when small and you have gsync
and he clearly did that with RTX features on
which fucks your fps over
how can you tell he is using it
I'm sure 1080 SLI will get higher average fps than a 2080 Ti in any game that supports SLI
I know right
in games that support SLI, GTX 1070 SLI will beat a 1080 Ti
uh no
technically any non DX12 game supports SLI
and very few games then have proper DX12 to support multi GPU
and they see scaling
Generally SLI scaling is less than 50%, and a 1080ti crushes a 1070
i didn't say all
hardly
a lot of games only see 30% scaling
which means they weren't optimized for SLI very well
games with good SLI optimization, 1070 SLI will beat a 1080 Ti
uh yeah any scaling = support
Building your engine to support SLI (AFR) means you just have extra money
feels like before the GTX 600 series, SLI optimization was really good
Rtx nvlink should be better than sli, but really its just sli anyway
I would never go for SLI since it often does not work that well since many titles do not really support it
You dont go for sli, because its supported or better, you go for it because its baller setup
you only go sli when got money to blow
so you get 2-3 top of the line cards
unless you get that rare scenario where you can get your card again later at a MUCH cheaper price that makes it worth it
NVLink on RTX IS SLI
Has someone said anything else?
Calling it NVLink makes it sound like its the Quadro style NVLink
NVLink and SLI are the same thing for RTX series?
could have sworn people talking about it having better scaling
Well nvlink should work better than traditional sli, as it should be more scalable and no master/slave coding is required from application
Okay this is what NVLink is
Or namely the new "nvlink" on rtx cards
a SLI bridge
with more bandwidth for the physical bridge
It doesn't create one virtual GPU like it does on Quadros
Also those bridges are like $600 and fucking huge
Interesting, have to double check my sources
Scuse me
Huh
Yeah theres a few different bridges
I guess for more bandwidth u pay more
And those cards are like 8k now
No
some of the bridges are locked to a GPU

and you can only use that bridge on that card
Its not meant for consumers
But I guess you're already paying 10k for the gpu
Yeah no its workstation
But still Haha
$40 bridge vs $600
Big price jump % wise
Different tech
NVLink on Quadros can combine VRAM into one pool
Like the $5k cards are $80 bridges
While NVLink on RTX is like
10k cards are $600
SLI
Yeah
Makes sense
I dont know much about workstation cards lol
Never gonna need one 
You mean you don't need an RTX Titan?
newegg

64-core Epyc CPU will be mine
Rtx titan
buying a server with them
its good for workstation usage
For gaming its functionally a 2080ti with like 100 more cuda cores and if you can't look at a spec sheet and assume performance you are special
server CPUs operate at low clocks for efficiency right
ye
yeah they need the core count not the clocks
Threadripper is close to server level lol
2990WX underclocked to 3 GHz or less could work as a server cpu
it doesn't user server ram though
pretty sure it supports ecc memory


threadripper performs better in games whenever you disable a lot of the cores lol
"Game Mode" in Ryzen Master specifically targets threadripper and it disables half the cores for gaming
disables the two dies without direct access to memory on the 2990WX
Nevertheless I would never buy a Threadripper for gaming only 😄
saw a 6-core Xeon for $50 on ebay lol
ECC DDR3 is cheap
hard to find a motherboard that works though
eh depends on the socket
do you think it's weird that Zen 2 could have Ryzen 3 with 6 cores/12 threads for $100
I doubt the leaks
they are confirmed
leaks these days are just early reveal
Intel 9th gen leaks were pinpoint accurate months before reveal
Too bad the AM4 socket limits the cpus they can bring on it, you have to get TR mobo to gain full benefits of ryzen 3000
Threadripper 2nd gen leaks were perfectly correct like 4 months before AMD revealed them
Uh yeah have you seen the size of TR2?
and threadripper 2 leaks also weren't accurate
I saw nothing about the memory bandwidth issues
AM4 can only do dual channel
they were accurate for the core count, clock speed, price, TDP and PCI-e lanes
I'm certain Zen 2 leaks are accurate
Zen 2 was supposed to see higher core counts anyways
Also the 9900k, etc was easy because manufacturers left them in BIOS updates
accidently?
most likely an oversight
@sonic osprey gamers don't need more than dual channel anyways
Nope it can not
Source?
his ass
Google it, im on phone
Like from AMD

yeah I can't find any source
just people saying "it doesn't help gaming and it cost more"
Its about pin count on the socket
Intel motherboards have the pins for quad channel, read that wrong
quad-channel only sees 5-10% higher performance than dual-channel in gaming
whereas dual channel sees over 20% than single
and like 50% more in games like BFV lol
You can easily make your CPUs more efficient (node shrinks)
and then take power pins and make them memory
TSMC cost of Research and Development for 7nm was expensive but the manufacturing is cheap
That applies to most things
No you can not go and change the socket layout 😂😂😂
That would be really bad call
Intel does it all the time
oof
Nope
and AM3 -> AM3+
but nah gotta change the ground pins so you plug and play
@latent light what I read is the manufacture costs are higher than estimates
I wonder when AMD will make the AM4+ socket
2020 is when DDR5 will probably come out
If they gonna use AM4 socket, they are forced to its limitations in the pin layout
Again, they can pull an Intel and redo the pin layout
Otherwise zillion law suits of fried up parts
Its not hard
on the package
"Does not support X470"
Also the board just won't post without the right CPU
Nothing bad happens if you stick a 8700k in a Z270 board
No they cannot do that, they need to make the chip not fit into the socket
See Intel
I have Ryzen 5 1600, should I wait until 2020 to upgrade to Ryzen 4000 series?
They got away without any issues
It depends
Why not wait until the Rzyen 5000 series?

Their point of supporting AM4 to 2020 is that people dont need to buy new mobos
I have B350 board, might just get a 3000 chip
ill be tempted between 3000 or 9th gen intel
but I wouldn't stick a 3700x in a AB320 or whatever the cheap chipset is
gotta see how they stack
There wont be amd chip available in 2019 q1 or q2 that beats 9900k
i dont want a 9900k
Maybe in q3 or q4 if you also get new x399 moboand go for TR4 sockey
3700x will crush the 9900k in multi core
Maybe in 2020
im a gamer yo
ill wait to see what amd offers
you really don't need more than 6c for gaming
The flagship cpus will need TR4

nah Intel doesn't need to drop prices
its followers don't give a shit
and validate it somehow
thing is, seeing around 15% higher IPC than previous Ryzen which will pull ahead of Intel by 5-10%

Rzyen isn't than far behind Intel right now
Intel can also release larger socket like amd TR4 to get more cored and more thermal surface
Ryzen 2000 IPC is only ~8% behind Intel 9th gen
thats one thing i dont get, why not just make cpus massive?
transistor density
and considering that cores aren't always helpful
doesnt tr have unused area
Plenty of people have said the core count race doesn't help the consumers
doesnt that help with thermals
1 core used to be enough
good soldering helps more
then 2 cores were enough
Issue is scaling
and 4 cores were enough
going from 4c to 8c is fucking hard on developers
now we have games that can 100% use 6 cores
and 4c is still enough
duh
There just needs to be 1 or 2 cores at 6ghz,and rest can be like 3ghz
outlier doesnt mean thats not where we are going
its not an indication thats where we are going either
just saying
Bfv runs butter smooth on 9900k
shits already here that could use 6c
uh yeah
when something like 70% of gamers have a 4c CPU
the industry is gonna be mostly built for 4c cpus
no one is arguing otherwise
Its hard to get actual benefit from just cores, simultaneous threads is where it is at
optimization for 4 cores will be relevant for a while longer
but games will still see more benefit of 6-8 cores
When they get AVX to games...
Ryzen 7 2700X gets higher fps than a Ryzen 5 2600X at same clock speed
2700X is 8 core, 2600X is 6 core
so games can take advantage of more than 6 cores
a 2600x is just a cut down 2700x
all CPUs of the same generation are cut-down variants lol
generally yes
even goes for GPUs as well
RTX Titan is the same die as 2080 Ti
that principle applies more for CPUs anyway
9900k, 9700k, 9600k are all the same die
Ryzen 2600, 2600X, 2700, 2700X are all the same
it all depends on binning
2700X could clock higher than the 2700 in the foundry, so they give it a higher base/boost
applies for every Intel and AMD CPU of the same gen
the reason low core counts exist is because a core was defective so they disable 2 and call it a 2600X (still using ryzen as example)
Check out Memory Express at https://www.memoryexpress.com/ Buy the Elgato Stream Deck Mini on Amazon at https://lmg.gg/8KVKq Buy the Elgato Stream Deck Mini ...
not bad

@jovial arch If you really want to stick to Intel, then a 9700k is the best gaming CPU right now
@jovial arch Thats just liquid cooling btw
but its expensive and not really worth it
call that shit water cooling again and I'll scalp your nuts
its water
if you live you can call it water cooling
propylene glycol
anyway buy 8th, 9th, or ryzen @jovial arch
Zen 2 boyo
probably just wait for Zen2
What's wrong with Zen 1?
If leaks are even semi accurate is going to fucking crush 9th gen for price to performance
Well Zen1 is the 1600/1700 etc
Zen 1 and Zen+ is great
and they're fine but getting older while newer stuff is coming out
I remember last time I was gonna upgrade everyone told me to wait for Zen hahahah
but Zen 2 is around the corner
I mean
like getting announced next month and should be out soonTM
I hate getting into rumors
I'll just get top of the line Zen?
but the idea is that Zen2 is 7nm
2600x / 2700x
Oh it is
and is supposed to be very close to Intel single core performance
Wtf
Zen2 is gonna be 7nm
Zen 2 comes out shortly after CES 2019 which is next month
TSMC has the node done
7nm has been confirmed 3 years ago

in 2017
Apple already has 7nm
Intel has its head up its ass when it comes to chip production
Most manufacturers have working 7nm nodes
Samsung, TSMC, Apple, and Global Foundries had it but dropped it
SK Hynix and Micron will probably have 7nm soonTM
@buoyant rover high end Zen 2 processors (Ryzen 9 and Ryzen 7) come out in January, Ryzen 3 and 5 come out Q2 and APUs Q3
Intel has done it
Yeah but I would not base shit on that
It has terrible yields
Until AMD announce something, just sit tight
I wanna play v so badly thoooo
We know its getting announced at Computex
unless they did and I missed it
I bet I could get the hookup for a top ryzen if I wanted to
and that I would expect the flagship to follow shortly after
I would get a 2600x / 2700x if you are going Rzyen
You can use a B450 or X470 board now for Zen2 @jovial arch
Both are still amazing CPUs
waiting for the Ryzen 5 3600 to come out tbh
Hmm
I have a 1600
You will need to update the BIOS of a X470 or B450 board to work on Zen2
So hot am4
I got a 1600 too
Not
I doubt I gain shit from going to Zen2
so I'll probably wait for 4600
assuming that's what it's called
I mean it really depends on your usage
How many cores does the 1600 have?
6c 12t
What's ur frame rate on bfv
Probably
Oh wait
I mean it definitely is
Zen 3 will be AM4+
AMD will want more pins
but I'm just going to buy another board like a smart fella
PCIe 4.0 is coming
not like my current board is good anyway
Ur telling me zen2 will be am4?
Okay that's a bet
yes @jovial arch
Zen 2 will be AM4 yes
Zen2 is supported until 2020
you mean
DDR5 memory comes out 2020 for consumer use
But I don't think Zen2+ is happening, so Zen3 in 2021
AM4
I'm gonna get a 2600x now and then upgrade to Zen 2 when it comes out and it will only be a cpu upgrade and I'll already have everything else
That works
Zen 3 might be in 2020
and Zen 3+ 2021
X chip isn't worth it if you're going to upgrade anyway
What frame rates do you guys get on 1600?
I haven't checked
I just need something to play bfv until zen2
I mean if its only like $20 more for the x CPU
my CPU outpaces my 1060 though
then buy it
It's $50 more lately
Then just overclock a 2600 to become a 2600x
Ryzen 5 1600 and RX 580 8GB, I get around 90-95 fps on average with 0.1% lows of 80 on BFV ultra settings 1080p
3000 MHz ram
Oh damnn
Oh yeah you better have decent RAM for Rzyen
thats not an issue
I should just get an 1600 until zen2
I recommend 3000 MHz ram or better for Ryzen
it costs like $2 more to buy 3000MHz ram over 2400MHz
Since it scales nicely off of speed up to around 3000-3200mhz
I'm guessing he already has DDR4
no
Nope rip
he has DDR3
r i p
Yeahhh
F
This next gen shit stg
I'm already getting too old for PC gaming and I'm 20 lmao
Man I even have a 2x8 kit of DDR4 in my desk just because it doesn't match and prices have fallen again
Oh fuck you 😂
gotta have that RGB
there's rumors that DDR4 will still work with DDR5 ram slots
it won't
That sounds like a dumb rumor
DDR5 has more pin IIRC
Ngl
288 pins on DDR4
DDR3 was 240 I think
anyway
DDR5 will start at 5200 MHz apparently

Ryzen at that speeds would be incredible
dunno because I'm not paying $80 for the JEDEC spec sheet
Okay so I can probably get an upgrade for $400
Getting 3600mhz to work on Ryzen can be a pain in the ass
DDR5 is gonna require AMD to change how the infinity fabric scales
if AMD unveils a 6-core processor for $100, that will be the best budget option available
yeah
@latent light Bet it starts at CL20 as well
Yeah but I might as well get a board and ram now right
maybe
I really wanna play bfv man
will be like 1.0v too
1.1v for DDR5
so...
real latency falls with every revision of DDR
CAS latency
A. Not the only timing that mattters
B. Means jackshit on its own
C. Has nothing on the actual latency of the memory
What's the cheapest ryzen CPU that can run bfv at 60fps? I'll get that and the board and ram and then get a zen2 when they get released
Then it's just a CPU swap
Okau
well
don't buy a 1600 either
just buy a 2600 and a B450 board
cause it's about the same price
I think DDR5 might use the same amount of pins
hell CES is actually in 2 weeks
does that mean backwards compatibility
so wait 2 weeks lol
lmao
what if they put the notch in a different spot

same amount of pins doesn't mean compatibility either
yeah the tech behind DDR5 is gonna be way different than DDR4
If it has the same amount of pins and is expected to be way faster
Most ram gens are pretty different
Imagine if they were cross compatible and you stick a DDR5 5200 mhz stick on a 6th gen Intel board that only supports 2400 mhz
lmfao
waste
You can buy DDR3 to DDR4 adapters
and I think there were a few motherboards that did both
wtf
yeah DDR3 was like 1.5v
max DDR4 voltage is 1.5v
Yooo
going past limits requires very strong cooling
Fx-8350 still has the record for highest clock speed lol
only 1 core enabled obviously
but hey they got a 9900k to 7.6ghz across all cores
de8aurer did?
oof
not that it matters
Since it isn't bench stable
It would crash the second you hit it with any load that wasn't the CPU-Z validation
there's records for highest overclock with a benchmark and a records for just overall highest overclock
also, do those CPUs that get pushed that high die afterwards?
Some benchmarks really like single core, some multicore
Others are AXV workloads, some really love fast memory, etc
ww2 all over again
Which is why each benchmark has its own record 
Man I should really switch to offset voltages instead of fixed for my CPU overclock
While I doubt constant 1.3v will do anything it could easily sit at much lower voltages when just downloading games
my gigabyte AB-350-Gaming 3 board doesn't let me set fixed voltages, only dynamic
X370-Gaming 5 does allow fixed voltage though
AB350 doesn't even support overclocking as far as I know
1st gen Ryzen supports up to 2933 MHz without overclock I think
don't remember
may be 2666
I got 3000 MHz ram on my Ryzen 5 1600 and B350 board
Ryzen 1000 series was impressive considered that it's the first generation
and that its predecessor was Bulldozer
Can't forget the funky module - core shit they did
2 cores in each module
with shared cache
still confused whether or not that's just multi-threading
tldr it pretty much is
or it is true 8-cores
was the most confusing architecture to look at
They just share the same cache, etc so its like SMT
I remember now why I thought first gen Ryzen supports 2933 MHz ram stock
because when I put 3000 MHz in and enabled XMP profile, it capped at 2933 and I had to manually set it to 3000MHz
so I'm overclocked right now

I put little MOSFET heatsinks on the SOC VRMs
helped a lot surprisingly
these right here
Not having heatsinks on your VRM 
yeah, board only had a heatsink on the CPU VRMs
or the VRMs on the left side
no stock heatsink for the top VRMs
Generally left side of the CPU socket is vcore
RAM is generally near the slots
to the right of them
Should only be like 1-2 phases
man I wish I was trusted 
yeah vram is to the right of the dimm slots
wait, vram?
voltage ram
oh thought video ram
nah its the RAM VRM
Are you sure that board isn't 5+2?
Since I doubt they did a 3 phase for the iGPU
what's these 6 mosfets for
at the top
that's 3 phases right there
I know the 4 phases to the left of the CPU is for Vcore
but the ones above confuse me lol
yeah there is VGA and DVI slot on the mobo
wait no
DVI and hdmi
I thought this board was pretty solid for being only $80
lol
I was going to get an 8-core Zen 2 cpu though
all I need to do is update bios for that
do risers have issues
oh wow that sucks so much 
one neat thing though is that the gpu fans circulate air on it
oof
NVMe is toasty and Samsung, etc try to avoid thermal throttling by letting it run hot for awhile
samsung 970 evo gets pretty damn hot
Under sustained loads (so almost never for consumers) NVMe is hot
but how often do you move 10GB files?
I like it because it doesn't require a PSU cable and SATA cable
2 less cables to manage
ye just buy a SATA M.2 drive
generally only like $10 more than a 2.5"
So like $150 for 1TB M.2 SATA vs $250 for the NVMe
crucial is amazing value
When everything SSD hits SATA 3 limits anyway it doesn't really matter who makes the SSD
I just like samsung and I'll pay the extra $10-20
the MX500 went on sale for $119 last week
Man prices went back up
demand
I bought a 500GB 860 evo for like $70
I paid the same for a 250GB 850 evo like a year ago
oof
oof yeah that is how computers work
$650 for a 1080 in June
Could have bought a 2070 for that
or a 1080ti when they were cheap af
or two 1080s used
1080 Ti best choice out of all of those if at the same price
Navi only targets mid-range market
I just want a good 1440p card and a 2080 is costly
Navi best card will be around 1080 performance
Vega will still be the high-end lol
in other news, Vega 2 announcement at CES
anyone have any idea why AMD chose HBM2 memory for Vega?
GDDR5 would have been cheaper
or GDDR5X
HBM2 isn't that much better than GDDR5 in gaming
may be even worse
GDDR5 in Vega would have made the value so much better
Micron has a agreement with nvidia for GDDR5X
If AMD goes with HBM3 for the next Vega GPUs
oof
expensive
helping my friend uninstall geforce experience with DDU, telling him to not download GFE and just download the drivers from the nvidia website

wait why is gfe bad?
nah he's just having a problem with it
can't install new drivers gets an error saying "windows task scheduler service should be running to continue"
even though it is running

ah
thought you were gonna say something dumb like "it keeps updating his drivers as soon as they come out"
lmao

I never use GFE because I don't like it 🤷
geforce needs your information to give you the best driver support @lofty light
stop denying free pc check!
I'll download MacCleaner before I do that!
hey guys what is the amd equivalent of the i7 8700k?
I have been thinking of switching since prices seem to be alot more reasonable
@crisp shoal at the moment, Ryzen 7 2700X
next month, Ryzen 5 3600X
the 3600X will be only $230, 8 cores/16 threads and 4.8 GHz boost clock
with possible overclocking to 5+ ghz
So I read that ryzen cpu's benefit from fast ram right?
also do they have a different socket than the intel ones?
Imo that is quite stupid thing to say that ryzen cpus benefit from faster ram, it should be said that more cores utilized benefit from faster ram
@crisp shoal 3000 MHz or higher for Ryzen is good
@sonic osprey it's just what I read in forums and I wondered why
and thanks @latent light
I guess I'll wait a few months and get the 3600x
Its mostly about people making conclusions on test results, when comparing lets say 8c16t amd and 6c12t intel and amd benefits more from the ram speed in that scenario (in some games that utilize more threads)
Also the on board cpu cache size(s) will have a say in the maths involved
Intel doesn't get much from faster ram unless you're overclocking
amd does though
it's not just a cores thing it's an architecture thing
though coffee lake has been seen to get significant performance boosts by faster ram, the architectures before it don't
Its the same for amd, you need to enable the xmp or what ever it is for the amd mobo you are using
xmp is just predetermined memory overclocking profiles
Yes?
higher clock speeds on ram result in higher latencies. in the past for intel these have offset each other performance-wise. with coffee lake this has changed and begun to follow the trend amd has been found to have where the higher clock speeds are influential enough to the core's processing that it outweighs those higher latencies.
but before intel's 9XXX processors there was no real performance boost from faster ram
7700k and 8700k both benefit from faster ram
not unless youre overclocking
the 7700k and 8700k are great OCing processors but they dont receive nearly the boost amd cpu's of similar gens get/got from faster ram
You are an amd fan boy I would guess, if you dont have a clue how ram works?
i have a 7700k
And it benefits from faster ram as much as similar amd with similar core count and clock speeds
Hi fellow soldiers ! Got a little question
Everytime that BF5 launches, I got dropped in the prologue of the solo campaign
Which is annoying since I have to wait for the video to end to be able to quit and join the multiplayer
is there a way to avoid this ?
no
https://youtu.be/43g3OTK2AbE?t=317 7700k with faster rams, no benefit?
but id guess its not tracking that u already opened the game
Ok great, guess I'll just do it then
Yeah it's weird
I mean, I still have my multiplayer weapons and ranks
yes
@sonic osprey hadn't seen that, i concede
Question, should I run DX12 since I got a 8 core processor, would it have a fps boost ?
Every processor benefits from faster ram till the cpu is bottleneck in the performance, the more cores/threads there are, the more benefit from the fast ram there is
what gpu @prime jasper
Ryzen 7 2700
I would not run dx12 yet, still buggy, dx11 + ffr seems more stable
so DX12 still crashes the game ?
Sometimes it stutters in bfv, have not tried in few weeks though
Can anyone name me a good modular power supply with braided cables?
where can i report bugs for the game
oh wow
never thought a psu could be that beatiful
will the new ryzen 3000 series have a different socket?
nope, still AM4
but you'd most likely need an updated BIOS if you would like to use an x370 or X470 Mainboard for them ^^
alright
so basically I am very uninformed when it comes to motherboards does anyone have a suggestion for me?
I need atleas 6 usb ports (4 for oculus rift, mouse and keyboard) so preferably 8
oof your looking at x470/x370 range
the x470 looks really good on paper but most of my build is black and white and that's why I ll first search for one which is mostly white or black
the red accents kind of annoy me
where can i report bugs for the game
i own a asus prime x470
@crisp shoal Crosshair 7 Hero is the best X470 board
mfw
BFV doesn't use the same sen settings as bf1
@crude storm I also think of getting that one actually
i had to choose between the crosshair 7 hero and the prime board, and i didnt really saw the "benefits" to pay 100 euros more
but hey, i am a linux guy
and i dont overclock
wait if you didnt want to oc why did you get an X470 board?
Sexy
I hate seeing bare pcb after owning a maximus x code
Is it?
It is?
@steep gust so the VRMs on the top of a motherboard are just extra ones for your CPU
since my board is 4+3 phase, all of those are for the CPU itself


one of them might be for iGPU though
I got a $80 Gigabyte AB350-Gaming 3









