#technology
1 messages ยท Page 141 of 1
1060 will struggle to maintain 60fps in V at 1440p
Apart from a few straggling Ebay listings, the board in question was listed for 250$.
i know i won't be able to do ultra settings at the res
i mean, you'll be lucky to play mostly low and not dip below 60
do you want "minimum" 60fps?
BFV isn't accurate
so, 100$ for the i5, 250 for the board, 350, quick mafs.
minimum 1440p > ultra 1080p
pixels are still very noticeable on 1440p
post processing and shadows devours FPS
just keep everything else up, itll look pretty
played on my brother's Acer Predator X34 which is 3440x1440 ultra-wide and I saw pixels easily
are people actually able to notice pixels on high-density screens? The last time I was able to "see" pixels, was on my really old small CRT TV. Since then I haven't been able to tell the difference between 720p+.
Controversial statement alert :P
ultra wide =/= normal monitor
21:9 ratio
You can see pixels on a 1080p 24" monitor
easily
i see dead pixels
but unless you are really looking you won't notice it on a standard 1440p 27"
I can see pixels on a 4K 27" monitor lol
is your face in the monitor?
^
yeah no
about 4 feet away
The pixel density at 4k is a little high for that
your eyes are broken ๐ฆ
you should sign up for the military, you'd be a phenomenal sniper.
or you are intentionally looking for pixels
lmao
4K 24" is most woke
thats no bueno lol
LG 21.5" 4K >>>
4k anything is a joke, it's so spendy, rip my paycheck, and the following one
too bad windows has shit res scaling
its useless, 60hz ftw!
whoever looks for pixels
4K isn't that expensive anymore
1080p looks very pixelated after using 4K
is also looking for dicksels
1440p > 4k tbh
just get a 144hz 4k gsyn monitor
4k is still too hard to drive in a lot of games
$300 for entry level 4K
add $200 for gsync ^
those monitors that were selling as "4K 144hz" can't really do 4K 144hz
the good thing about 4k, games that ard too hard to drive and you want fps, play at 1080p
looks great
Aha, that's funny.
^ perfect scaling
ya
you have to overclock the refresh rate for 144hz
what
Like the $2000 one?
I have 3440x1440 100Hz and I honestly can't tell the difference between 100 and 144
Or some 4k 60hz one?
it should have higher Hz for lower resolutions?
So now it's back to a VGI and VGA cable, yay.
Also the panel can do 4k 60hz, you don't want to drop the resolution and try for higher refresh rates
ill have to gather more info
That looks like shit
4k 144hz is possible through displayport 1.4 if you use DSC
playing at lower resolutions than what the monitor has looks like shit
1440p on a 4k monitor is gonna look bad
very bad
ya 1080p only
also, @unborn epoch be proud, you totally got me to try out windows 10 again. I'm gonna install it for my SSD when I get it tomorrow.
Might as well try it, last I tried it was that weird beta they had.
Make sure to remove Cortana
^
ya cortana is ass
and delete a bunch of other shit
I already plan on it, I know the windows 10 security shenanigans you gotta do.
I wish gaming on Linux were more of a thing
it's on the stinking spec page
I hate having to use windows just to play vidya
Its 60hz
get the Massdrop Vast
yea so this monitor only does 60hz ever, period but there are some 4k that do higher Hz at diff res? but thats useless as you'd have to make your monitor change res?
I wish there were more 1440p 144hz IPS panels with gsync
You can buy a 4k 144hz monitor
the Dell is an amazing TN panel
ya somehow there are only a handful
But TN 
1080p 144hz or 1440p 100hz?
ya 1440p 100hz defnitely
tfw nothing above 60 
way more pixels to work on too
Acer xb271hu 1440p IPS 165hz with gsync
i feel like 100hz and 144hz wouldn't be near as big as a difference as going from 60 to 100hz
tis not
it will be once you been playing 100hz for 5 years
90 is imperative
yeah after 100Hz, I feel like returns start to diminish heavily
in windows and certain games like plebfield ure
some people say going from 144hz to 240hz is like going from 30hz to 60hz lmao
if you master any true FPS, that's different
after 144hz the input delay gains are greatly diminished
go play warsow at 100hz and 144hz
144 to 240 is dumb
you will notice a difference
we always say this.. why would anyone ever need more than a 1.44mb
majic you dingus, it's not only about inputlag
144hz to 240hz isn't much
it starts to become about fluidity
esports
is 60 ok, or is 144 really worth that investment?
i mean when you are in that 1% that you think you're at a disadvantage due to 1 less fps or 1ms less input yes ๐
but for us humans.. no
i can never go back to 720p
I'm sure as hell getting 240hz, hell even if the 500hz is ever going to be made, there will be a clear noticeable difference
I played battlefield 4 on xbox one which was 720p 60 fps
that resolution looked shit
i can never go back to getting up to turn the dial on my TV clockwise to change the channels
yet
Ever
ever
tell that to VR
Your reaction time isn't that small
VR NEEDS 240hz if not more
uh no
uh yes
VR needs 90hz
uh no
VR needs humanHz
90fps to avoid motion sickness
motion sickness is the bare minimum
takes 13ms or more for an image to reach your brain
stop talking about god damn latency
Our eyes see differences in colors
it's about seeing individual images
aka ghosting
any differences above 100hz are small
So like 150-200
again, it's not about latency
Uh yes
not after 144hz
yes, that has absolutely nothing todo with the latency majic istalking about
people play at higher refresh rates for latency and frame times
60hz is 16.67 ms between each frame I believe
ideally you want to get rid of motion blur and let your eyes do the blurring
You only buy a 240hz monitor for the imagery reduction in input lag / latency
but you need insane high hz screens for that to happen
So disable monitor blur in games?
It looks like shit anyways
go play 120hz and 240hz, you will see the difference in fluidity
Windows felt better
60hz and 75hz is noticeable
144 -> 240 isn't very much
in 20 years 240hz 4k is mainstream
Uh big doubt
probably 8k 144hz is mainstream by then
Remember kids
10nm was suppose to be out in 2015
Hardware progression is slowly down hard
doesn't have to be, just put more effort into better architectures
speeding back up because of competition in CPU market
hardware progression is slow in GPU market though
it's fun being able to put more transistors in the same space
we aren't seeing architectural differences anymore
but people think more core = better
soon companies will have to if they can't just make shit smaller
last big change in CPU architecture was going from FX to Ryzen
So we get more cores
is gud
more cores is becoming more relevant
games only used 2 cores in 2013, now games use 4-6 cores on average
hell a lot of games don't even use 4
it'll grow
it will grow definitely
why not let the cpu handle the workload
you sound like bill gates but with less money on the bank
games will start creating more realistic engines which will utilize more cores
"muh 640k)
Uh yeah you realize the amount of work it takes to divide a workload across multiple cores?
Especially for games, were the CPU is constantly changing what it is doing
you realize the amount of work it took to crack the enigma
cmon guy
thinking we're reaching performance peak is dumb
for any calculator
Until Intel gets their shit together
More and more of gaming is getting moved away from CPUs anyways
you can play at higher resolutions which draws the workload over to the GPU
which is why a Pentium G4560 will get similar framerates to a i7 at 4K
there's plenty of massive jumps to make in the computing world
yeah and most isn't for gaming
perhaps not the way we do it now in terms of architecture/materials
you don't need a $300 cpu for 4K gaming
how is something like AI not a massive leap in gaming?
AI for tutorials, AI for enemies, AI for companions, AI for bosses.
AI all the things!
Most games are multiplayer
How does AI for tutorials and AI for bosses not apply to multiplayer
yes
Because most games are PvP
put AI into multiplayer games
So little tutorials and no bosses
AI will be come as unpredictable as real players
create online worlds where you fight war with thousands of soldiers
That's a gross overestimate of what gaming currently is.
You're saying all gaming is PvP and multiplayer?
The most popular games right now are PvP
And as such, the only leaps in technology should be accounted for those specific types of games?
Fortnite, CSGO, LoL, Dota, PubG, BFV, BF1, etc
I seen plenty of opportunity for AI to become a thing in games, even multiplayer
GTA would become very interesting
Legend of Zelda, Every mario title, Racing games, etc.
Also we're thinking of AI as replacing personalities right now
AI can be put to use in the strangest ways
Not everything is an FPS multiplayer, and leaps in technology may not benefit those heavily, but they might in some way, and it will work wonder for other genre's. so is it fair to just call it "not for gaming"?
ya, plenty to win for gaming, plenty.
if it isn
if it isn't for gaming directly, it will be used to create more efficient chips that we humans can't think of ๐
Imagine if the antagonist in a horror game could dictate what scared you the most, out of a set of events. Or a dog in a game that had physics, fluidity, and acted like...a dog, not a dog-replacement.
AI is neat, and it's not the only field that needs to be developed on heavily in tech.
i want another jump in physics
halflife1->halfife2 was such an awesome jump
can we have another jump like that please
i'd love to see games take advantage of more threads
calculate entire oceans and clouds in a volumetric way,. thaaanks
well, that's done with GPUs
but the thing is, if you have another jump that drastic, i don't see where else it can expand upon there, before being "too" realistic
there's no too realistic
??
too mad we've made little progress in multi GPU scaling
I mean, im some situations it might.
You might be able to create shooters so realistic people get PSTD from it.
You're telling me if the snow on the ground had a random ice patch, you fell down in the middle of a firefight only to get shot and die, and that's a "fun" physics engine?
It's true to real life, sure, but it's not fun.
games have made a lot of progress in graphics in the past several years, too little progress in actual gameplay
There need to be limits, of course.
Exactly, you can't go much further in the case of physics, before giving up fun, for the sake of realism.
But don't you want visuals where every single snowflake or single grain of sand can be influenced
i'd rather see a focus on moving towards like a 120Hz tick rate than on graphics
There are major jumps to make in physics imo
at least until more graphical fidelity stops making games harder to play
Isn't that a leap in the field of graphics engines? less physics?
tbh, in a shooter idrc about physics outside of movement and ballistics
smoke now isn't physics based, it should though
i mean, it's all about the engine that interprets all the values the individual grains give you, to the actual hardware, no?
I think BF really overdid destruction
and how efficient that is?
If you are running through a smoke greande, the smoke should follow you
it should trail
that's all physics
it's kinda cool until everything is flattened and the map design is ruined
yes, you need limitations
sometimes i cant see the enemy through my smoke but the enemy can see me
that doesn't mean the tech shouldn't be there, in limited form
its like saying raytracing -> pathtracing is useless
or let's go back, tessellation was a useless invention
lets go back even more, bumpmapping, more? polygons
tessellation and raytracing are both useless
how exactly
raytracing is huge
raytracing is a step towards pahtracing which will solve ALL Lightning issues
divide your fps by 3 and get a less bright map
it's like the holy grail of graphics as far as we can see
yes, in 1999 putting you resolution at 800x600 hacked your fps in half too
is 800x600 useless now?
looks like ass as of right now for me and divides your fps by 3
that's what we're talking about though
sure, now raytracing eats too many resources
the tech is awesome but it's not ready
tessellation is still ass tho
i disagree, why is it ass?
i turn it off every game
RTX by NVIDIA is a big step
no point to it for me
live raytracing with dedicated components
it doesnt make a noticable difference
there are a shitton of tricks and hacks used to cheat you into thinking reflections you see or shadow you see is real
raytracing/pathtracing turns that into true shadows/reflections

honestly tho i dont like super realistic looking games i like having lots of color and effects that even though unrealistic make the game look better
all these techniques don't just create hyper realistic wordls
that's up to the artist
its why BF5 looks so much better to me vs bf1
i feel like the fact that fortnite got so popular is a big middle finger to AAA titles that shoot for good graphics
I'll pass on RTX for now
you shouldn't be aiming for rtx now anyway
only 1 title supports it at the moment at a major cost of performance
1080ti is the strongest card I'd want atm
Yeah ik
I was going to get a 2070ti, to replace my 1070ti, but then I saw the benchmarks
Changed my mind real quick
ya no need
when i heard the 2000 series will have raytracing and new tech i baught a 1080ti
because new tech always takes time
yeah
RTX cards are at the point where I don't even consider them to exist
its similar to the titan x but the titan x actually had power
If you tell me you have a Titan or 1080ti, I'll pass it off as you having the best card atm, RTX failed my expectations that hard

but im happy to see it
ya it's advancement, is gud
it will get replicated perfected
amd already said they are getting into it at a later stage
it needs to become standard
but idk man it doesnt even look that good to me
im wondering if thats just because its new or because its not that impressive looking in general
Idk, I feel the same
it's not impressive b ecause it replaced all other shadowing techniques too
its like putting reflections up one more notch above ultra
they are true reflections though
for example, fire reflections on the ground aren't even reflections
sure but how does that translate into actual visuals
seems like it would make designing a game easier if you made it with rtx only
if thats the case this is so big
if you made this standard game developers would be able to produce games cheaper and faster
and at better quality which is a win win
of focus on other things
ya
eventually you'll be able to let AI generate huge parts of worlds/characters/weapons/whatever
so like that one space game
interesting stuff is ahead of us
i dont think there's a game out that does world creation using AI
but math, yes
no man's sky?
does NSK have tech that learns and creates based on that?
that's what I'm referring to
it still runs on parameters
i mean creating procedural worlds isn't difficult
but sure, in a sense that's AI i guess
if you give it a task outside of its parameters it wouldnt solve it unless it was an ASI that can think
ya
and adapt to the situation
you can make games with a simple ai tho just a really well programed one
its definitely achievable in theory and deep learning has proven it can work practically
technically if you made a program with every parameter possible you would make a super ai but thats basically impossible lol
i have a self learning ai that compiles a list of all known variables and constantly updates itself
lets make a vidyagame someday majic
i do make vidya games
ya im starting to do things in unity3d now too
if i could just keep VS open all day and never open unity, id be excited
unity is complicated af
the progrma itself isn't that hard to understand
the programming you have to do to make complicated things is, well, complicated
So don't use unity 
the programming is easy x_x
the unity side to do stuff is the annoying part
fk monkey work
setting up animations etc
animation controllers
besides unity and unreal engine
what is there to use that doesn't require you to write your own massive engine
ya i thought so
wouldnt have made money without it
dont you just feel bad for dice working so hard to make a stunning game but than EA marketing fucks it all up
EA hasnt impacted this game in any negative way
no? "dont buy the game"
85% lower preorders compared to bo4
it is
but it was marketed better
and it has more players because of that
EA handles marketing and if you thing BFV was marketed well ... you have some other problems to attend to
BFV has no advertising
roblox
its great and i get instant games
there is no hype
seems fine to me ๐
the game is great thats not the issue
where are PC sales release numbers?
you'd need to add premiere numbers for first month as well
thats the shit stick of it all
just a google search away
theres no info
there is but it doesnt involve premier
top 5 results yield nothing related to last 3 days
even if you estimate the premier in its not even close to being top 10 games right now
once again in terms of sales
thats whole lgbt thing and the developer calling people uneducated took a tool
It's #11 on amazon best digital sellers list atm whatever that means
he's gone he can lay an egg
i mean why is BF1 #12
thats current data
and see the issue
this cant lie!!! ๐
#1 most wished, christmas here we come plebs everywhere!!!
WEWT
once again CURRENTdata
i mean it was released in the middle of a ton of games
most of which people will play single player first before investing in something like V
Fallout 76 tanked i thought?
type in pre order sales
in google, bfv show for you?
top hit lol
everyone is "wondering" and wants the game imo
itll become more successful over time.. screwed up release but you cant stop the best in series in years forever
BECAUSE its the new game all the other large games have already come out
and compared to bo4 and rdr this game bombed
the important thing really is they fixed the fk ups
marketed completely away from claws
showed just gritty women
fired/dude leaving that was the SJW
delayed cosmetics
and Boins
he didn't really get fired you have to read between the lines
it was controversy EA was trying to add so that they would get more attention and marketing
this time, it favored us
it didnt go well for them
i feel like he didnt get his way
women just look like dudes, all you see is gritty faces
idk man the high pitched screams piss me off
if his daughter wants to play she can be a dirty, same clothed soldier like everyone else
LOL
i love em now
esp when i fuckin kill em
it adds such intensity
sounds like cutting a cats neck
like just shrieks of horror, adds to my enjoyment
I'm not exactly familiar with it so..
But if I attach 2 different monitors to 2 different inputs on the same graphics card, itll be able to run both?
Yes
I've only done 2 different cards
Alright, cool.
That's now a DVI-VGA cable, an HDMI-DVI cable, mobo, cpu, ssd, all in the mail
Fuck me that's a lot of stuff o.o
Hopefully itll turn out to be worth it
Oh yeah, and the 2.5 to 3.5 converter I got as well, for the ssd
6 things total this paycheck for tech, money well spent
it normal to have 5-8 cpu idle doing nothing but then moving your mouse across the screen is 20%?
ya, it's just the trojan adjusting
is called windows
any sort of processing, including cursor movement, affects your CPU usage lol
didnt know mouse input was so cpu intensive x_x
u want ur 20ghz MousE iNterPolAtioN
What's that panda
I mean it doesn't do it to me
cpu usage of just moving mouse all over
Ah
Yeah and the server lag was back again today
But did they release the bfv sales numbers
Saw some discussion above about that
i get the same thing
lets see
Weird
cpu 0 jumps highest
everything else is at 15% or something
0 is at 20? something like that
25% maybe
but im just super good at using mouse
im so fast, my cpu is having trouble
O.o
ok this is weird.. on my 60hz its using all cores
on my 144 its almost 100%'ing 1 core
none others
just cpu 6 though
so not phys
Weird
i mean i know theres some fkd up probs having a 60 + 144 connected
Report back with your 9700k
i cant watch a video on my 60hz while playing a game
itll lag everything out to shit
but that problem is all over the internet
try to fix those bugs in the game or you will lose your community again in less than 2 weeks just like what happened in BF1
<@&140941611415633920>
lmao
we arent devs LMAO

they told me this is an official channel for Dice thats why i joined
fix the damn game hess

you knobbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
Don't get the idea to tag devs on here either telling them to fix the game.

fix the darn game Atic, ffs.
press the fix button at1c
Its not working, i'm pressing it and nothing is happening
Did you try unplugging it and plugging it back in?
Yeahh :/
Welp, Im out of ideas.
Me two, better call IT and see if they can figure out his mess
Mission accomplished
Sounds like a solid plan
Everyone pack up and go home
Had a good run
Good job everyone
my disappointment is immense. i bought a 27" Asus ROG 1440p 144hz monitor. and it was defective (occasional image corruption in left half of screen). had to go back. and then when researching other options to buy since i was now sketchy on that model because of it's color balance (photographers eye) ... i found out all the 144hz monitors are VA panels and almost none come in 32" (my other monitor is a 32" 4k monitor for image processing).. So return the defective 1440p144hz panel and ordered a 32" IPS 1440p samsung panel (i know their Image Q is good)
Although the one I got was an ips
And yeah I guess maybe they don't have a partnership with nvidia
I take FreeSync over G-sync anyday, but surprising to see a company with the best displays not have even one G-sync monitor lol
Yas
Yas
Yas girl slay
@red ingot i had gotten the pg278qr
you can get a cheap AMD card like an RX 550 and use it as the primary gpu so you can pick your high-end nvidia card to play games on freesync
All 144hz panels arenโt VA I have a 27โ 1440p ips panel 144hz.
i love my parents
Yeah same mines ips as well
i just orderd a 32" 1440p 60hz traditional samsung IPS
27" seems like the perfect monitor size, but 32" is good if you like to sit back not be close to the monitor
my current "main" display, my image editing display, is a Asus ProArt
joshrk: i get to crank up the quality and don't care
i'll revisit 144hz when the technology is more mature
@red ingot the 144hz was the new one. i didn't like any of the others that were available. I'll revisit it when the tech is more mature
color accuracy on VA panels is unacceptable
Acer xb271hu is ips 165hz and gsync.
U didn't like ips
Ips isnโt the same as VA
Yas yas
Yeah that's what I mean
@drowsy beacon and 27" not 32"
I love u
I love u too
@red ingot yes i know they do, but not in 32"
Thatโs how my daughter was made ๐
Through anal?
And u were fine with the 27" before
Interesting
@red ingot no, i really wasn't. but i was willing to compromise. but then i learned more and decided not to
I want 32" 4k 144hz+ microled
like i said: i'll revisit the tech when it's more mature
Shush nick
when i can get a 1440p144hz IPS HDR10 panel that isn't overpriced and is reliable i'll get it. so probably 5 years
Microled
eh yeah the higher FPS was nice
but i've been playing in 60hz for 25 years. i can deal
I could never go back to 60hz
60hz is ok
No
If your name is stevie wonder
Its painful
I see what you did there

lets put i this way: image quality matters to me more than the added smoothness that higher refresh rate gives
Oof
i'm a photographer what do you expect
So not gamer
I hope everyone had a great thx giving now have a great holiday or Christmas ๐
Ya
Isn't dual screen an option
@red ingot not ONLY a gamer. but if you consider someone who has been playing games since 1993 not a gamer then...
makes a wanking motion
I hope everyone had a great thx giving now have a great holiday or Christmas ๐
What nick said
agh
1 photography monitor
nvm
1 gaming
Dualdonger is certainly an option
Yeah, I could see having a real high quality monitor, 60hz or whatever, then one for gaming specifically.
im try it one mroe time
I hope everyone had a great thx giving now have a great holiday or Christmas ๐
i give up
๐ค
@unborn epoch i will be doing dual screen. 1440p for gaming, 4k for image processing. but i'm not going to accept shitty color reproduction on the main display
I have dual IPS panels. I canโt stand TN.
Ips = shitty?
Aight
I have an IPS monitor for movies and a VA 144hz for gaming
Ok
@red ingot how many times have i had to tell you that no IPS displays in an acceptable size were available in 1440p144hz
279pq is probably da best of both worlds
IPS > VA > TN
however in my personal experience, VA has pretty poor colors compared to IPS
144hz > 32"
no 32" were available, and 1 27" was available and it was a known bad model
@red ingot TO YOU
To everyone
@red ingot I know it might be hard to get your tiny fucking brain around, but not everyone has the same priorities as you, and your opinion doesn't rule the fucking world. grow up
Thereโs more than 1 27โ model
Wow
Wow
Ya 32" 1440p 144hz won't happen
Well that escalated quickly
4k 144hz 32" will
Don't have to be so salty sir
can't imagine why i'd be annoyed with 5 minutes of childish trolling
Probably 5-10 years
Well he seems like the guy that yells at the tech support guy
I'm the guy who writes the fucking operating system
calm down boys
Tech is no joke!
and doesn't have patience for people who think that their opinion is the one true answer to rule them all
maybe grow the fuck up and you won't get called out for being an asshole
You're the one taking an internet conversation 100% seriously
Pls b nice
And er I don't see how I'm being an asshole.
yes yes it being on the internet is totally an excuse for your bad behavior
completely
Okay
and the sun rises in the west
Pls
now i'm going to go headshot some scrubs with the M1A1
So I'm an asshole and having bad behaviour. W.e.
i'll stop you right there both of you. enough... -_-
I'm dropping this
More Starbucks less anger 
Hahaha internet fight ๐๐คฉ
๐ ๐ ๐ ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ
Venti poop scooper
With extra whip 


๐ฆ
๐

Should get the Logitech G933 instead 
Im looking for something decent that isn't beyerdynamic
didn't know you could push past 1.4v
get liquid nitrogen and try it
1.4v is the daily limit

You can go up to 1.5ish volts for benchmarks
Without extreme cooling
I can do most of Cinebench at 5.4ghz
Gonna tweak it around and maybe go up to 1.52v
I don't think its temperature but I should also watch that
does the noctua d15 cool more efficiently or less than a water block with solder vs TIM or no difference?
Obviously a custom loop will win
Look at reviews I guess
And solder is better than Intel paste
i mean the d15 barely is beaten by any aios, thats the only consideration im still having
im still undecided on having water in my PC ๐
AIO you'd normally be better off with the noctua
i mean, i wonder why?!
You can buy a copper AIO and crush a D15
I went from the noctua to an AIO though just because I kept cutting my fingers on it
And it looks ugly as sin
The issue is when they compare stuff on non-delidded CPUs so the Intel paste is the limiter
it affects one more than the other?
copper blocks are a lot better than aluminum ones
copper is better at transferring heat while aluminum is better at dissipating it into air
if the d15 went on any sales at all i was going to get one but it has just remained a fkin rock through black friday
and never seems to go on sale
looking at camelcamelcamel it just stays at $90 and sometimes $80 best bet, ever
but i mean yea, it eats your entire case lol
i have the 212 evo now and i thought it was big ๐
parts for new build ordered, now I have to play the waiting game :(((
Amen
and I know the gpu is gonna take a while

welp, newegg is outta stock on the evga so gotta wait on it regardless
what evga
it supposedly syncs with my gpu so may as well use same software

ek = $
yea no, ill go d15 before i put a custom loop in my rig

for my new one im running 2x kraken x62's
with no work, i got no free time ever again
What refresh rate should be use for a Logitech G series mouse ? 500 or 1000?
highest possible
Changing to windows 10 has not fixed my issue, btw
After checking for the hell of it, on the off chance it was 8.1 for whatever reason
are the cyber monday deals really any better than black friday
or any different at this point
Sometimes
depends on what kinda hardware you're shopping for
someone use shadowplay to record BF1/BFV replays?
my shadowplay only record in 720p
I use windows DVR
I find a post talking to add Window.Height 1080 and Window.Width 1920 on user.cfg, but after this my shadowplay record at 1920x1060.
Are you running windowed?
@lofty light I completely disable DVR on my PC because this he drop some frames on Overwatch for me ^^'
Nope, fullscreen
but BFV start at windowed
BF1 and BFV start at windows 720p mode, and after 2-3 second change to fullscreen mode
but shadowplay bug with this and only record in 720p
if I creater a user.cfg config to force start at 1920x1080 shadowplay record at 1920x1060 IDK why...
if I disable instant replay after the game launch and enable again, shadowplay record in 1080p
but I need to disable/enable instant replay every time as I start the game
exist any console command to start the game at fullscreen mode to put on user.cfg?
I alredy try GstRender.FullscreenEnabled 1 but didn't work ๐ฆ
well... apparently even DRUNKKZ3 have this problem https://twitter.com/drunkkz3/status/1060529950787334144
I give up
Dice fix pls 
Mehh, only shitty cybermonday deals around here
Shadowplay is super buggy in general
If you use Spotify, it doesn't work 70% of the time
ALT + Enter into / out of the game freezes my whole system ๐ amazing
alt+enter is the hotkey to switch between fullscreen and windowed
alot of games don't handle it well if you switch alot
I use alt+tab that works great
yeah, problem is just, game starts in windowed mode and i need to press alt+enter to get it into full screen
Anyone else unable to get sound from PC speakers?? But it works fine with wireless headsets???
@prime jasper have you tried deactivating the wireless headphones in your sound settings?
pc speaker sound is on nvidea driver. for me at least. i had that issue once i reinstalled the driver.
Just deactivate everything you don't need and then restart the game
if it doesn't work by then look in the sound options if there is a way to select a specific audio playback device
btw
for everyone who is experiencing random fps drops
I have a gtx970 and the latest drivers caused all of my games to have major fps drops
I now installed the one before that which seems to run fine.
@crisp shoal fps drop with frame render off. Right now dx12 is smooth and frame render off gives higher fps than dx11 frame render on. gtx1070
oh wow rly?
need to try that out
@crisp shoal yeah I've done all of that...what's more odd too...is when I start a cut scene with no sound the game also plays the cut scene in fast forward...the oddest issue I've ever had.
thats.. odd
@wispy wing Yea, I think DX12 is smoother on my gtx 1070 as well. But FFR on yields better fps
My timberlands are swag as fuck
Well that price made decisions easier for cooling. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01N16CAKN/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_Xda.BbRDAKFBX
niiice
@rigid knoll do u notice input lag with ffr on dx12 ?
Ram out for delivery today, mobo is just one state North... Might get everything by Weds including cooler. 
@wispy wing only a placebo effect. But I haven't tested it that much. I tried few times toggling it on-off and went for the better fps
Yeh I just realized I replaced whole PC lol
Case, ram, cpu, mobo, gpu all in last month.
Psu
Yep nothing left
he got that one as well
I wanna see some benchmarks for RTX2080 for BFV@3440x1440
Anyone on PC figure out how to make a PS4 controller work? Id like to have it plugged in and usable in the planes
Most of the time I just plug mine in and it works, but I havent tried with bf5 yet
@prime dune same but it doesnt want to work. saw BF1 users had issues as well since EA supports microsoft only
Hmm, I'll give it a go tonight
@prime dune thanks!
np
Not too bad for ultra. Medium might go to solid 100fps with all camera effects turned off?
what is this blasphemous website claiming a 2700x isnt a bottleneck for 1440p no matter what gpu
unless you own a 2080Ti
Hm, I have only 6700k
well it all depends on what all the cpu has to calculate per frame and how long gpu takes to render per frame
usually resolution is involved more with gpu than cpu
Bf uses much of the cpu
bf uses everything
Cuz of that i bought a ryzen 7 2700x for my i5 4690k
yea i mean my 3770k does fine 90% of the time
no telling what the real results of the 2700x are during the entire round
so in theory "bottlenecking" because of cpu is because of GPU can process data faster than cpu can prepare it
yea the gpu is just sitting idle waiting for frames to process
my 2070 is 70% active
i mean, it's hard to exactly 100% both your cpu and gpu
Yeah, in overwatch i have only 50% cpu utilization and 50% gpu, 200frames, my slow ram is only reason my cpu load wont go higher, and my cpu is reason why my gpu load wont go higher
you should ensure your CPU is not a bottleneck and go from there though
you can always add settings to GPU
i can 130% res scale 1440p to 100% my GPU
but id rather throw more frames at it so i got a new CPU
yeah more stable frames is good
it is far better to have like 140-180 than between 60-100
100 min would be amazing but at 1440p that's too rich an order
thats a bit over 2k res
like 15% more
i assume you have like 130fps or so?
90-120
yea i guess you'd need to turn Post and Lighting down to get what i do
just high preset
yea but at that point you should use ultra textures, filtering
hate this downtime after work, 1h20min to be at golf practive, not really enough time to enjoy gaming or do anything properly
i just use TryHard settings ;P
texture quality, filtering, mesh, terrain qual ultra, everything else low/off
yeah, texture quality dont matter that much with DDR6 and rtx cards
not like they cap the memory per map
yeah
delete that sentence please, lol
:(
and spend your 1h20 to go fix your settings ;P
i found a sweet deal on HUE bulbs
i need a new 15" sub
MORE RGB IN MY ROOM IS MORE FPS RIGHT?
only if there is no more wall space to fit more rgb
is def moar FPS, more stimulation
otherwise you are rbg capping your fps
RGB ram + cpu waterblock RGB coming = more FPS
looking over at my rig will give me a semi
higher KD
if you has clear window to your case, the hue RGB will energize your components
I do want the nzxt manta case 
stupid ass 970 Evo's are enticing me
but my OS drive would need one first before gaming
HDD isnt really even used after level load at all
^
lol well i doubt a 970 evo would load faster than 850 ;D
you need faster ram too then
indeed, fill that GPU
if i got a 500gb id be severely conflicted using it for OS or Games
250gb isnt good enough deal

550 watt psu enough for vega 64?

