#technology
1 messages ยท Page 100 of 1
I mean we aren't really a tech support. normally if you're having issues with performance on games from EA, you should contact the EA support https://help.ea.com
Thz optimisation of game are not good okok i thing its because some update of game freezing my
Thanks

Mods rebellion
Steve just posted this on his youtube, might be helpful for some in here since we had heated discussions about CPUs last few days: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAsyo8gIyys
Battlefield V: https://amzn.to/2CrBMLo Check GPU prices now: GeForce GTX 1050 2GB: https://amzn.to/2AW7Nuk GeForce GTX 1050 3GB: https://amzn.to/2vVvWf4 GeFo...
that wasn't for your issue
was just a general thing lol
why do you keep deleting your chatlog
What's your [dice] tag for ? @shrewd fulcrum
for my name @ocean valve
Guys it there a solution for this?
DX11 - Game runs at a smooth 60FPS but I get this crash at random times
Hi ! Cant connect the game
So I am writing points for a video on Nvidia RTX and why it might end up DOA
Oh man, if you need more input i could go on on that topic for days
I have a google doc with all my talking points
been rather vocal on the nvidia subreddit and overclocking forums about that already
nice
My biggest argument will be the limited adoption due to dev time needed and that the mainstream wont have these RTX cards, plus the 2060 wont even be a RTX card which is what most gamers buy for 1080P 60 gaming
And the cost is high on both $$ and frames
With ray tracing, you will be playing games like BFV at 1080P just to keep 60
Even on 2080ti
I agree, it's still early days. But Ray Tracing will advance, as well as the hardware needed to get proper resolution and fps. Game Engines will start adopting the technology, making it a "one button solution", bringing the cost for developers lower. I personally wouldn't buy an RTX this year. There will be 2-3 games that will take advantage of the technology in a good way, and after 1 year, there will be a new RTX for the same price or even cheaper.
oh god, there are cheaters in game already
@steady wasp RIP
how fast are these people really? ๐
we're 2nd day in and already seeing this infection
Some people like to see the world burn
if you're getting killed through walls don't forget bullet penetration is a thing
It's great isn't it :D
brings back 1.6 memories
I basically play de_nuke on narvik B point
I am literally unable to join any games in the advanced search
it has been like this since yesterday, all my ports are forwarded (my PC is in DMZ on my router)
UPnP enabled, everything with every other game is fine except for bf v...
@charred basin Have you tried switching your DNS and/or clearing your DNS Cache yet?
boy this game is a mess
WTF WHY
@real bramble what DNS are you using? google's or 1111 ?
cloudflare
yeah that's 1111
same as me, configured for ipv4 and v6
tried releasing, renewing, nothing... what the fuck is wrong
wat speed do you have?
@charred basin I had this problem, cleared my DNS, restarted Origin and Battlefield a couple of times and it worked again
That's not a tech problem, this is an open beta
I'm having a problem where I pre ordered bfv and downloaded the open beta, but I can't play it.
@real bramble After I think about 3 - 4 hours of editing, the video is done and will most likely go up Monday since I already have a video going up today
๐
I'm experiencing low 60s to high 70s fps wise with everything maxed out at 1080p
This game really pushes a lot of hardware
what gpu?
also I still can't play this fucking game
I tried everything, sometimes it works, 90% of the time it doesn't
Anyone know a good studio mic?
is the cable of that yeti pro detachable?
It's via USB
Nice. Does it pick up your keystrokes tho?
Yeah, but you can adjust the settings, and get a shock mount for it
I'll show you mine, one sec
Yeah
It's better to get an arm stand for it as well, it'll pick up all kinds of noises if you just set it on your desk
especially while you're typing
The Samson Meteorite is pretty good
It's a standing microphone but you can get a stand for it
which mount do you have? or is it universal?
I have a Rode Microphone stand
This one: http://www.rode.com/accessories/psa1
Works really well, and just clamps on the desk
@tawny plank
But if you're looking for a gaming headset, I use this one: https://www.astrogaming.com/headsets/A40-MIXAMP-TR.html
Haha
You're welcome. Either one works really well, imo.
Just depends on the route you wanna take
You can customize all the settings, and have different presets
A50's are nice too, I had those
Only thing I didn't really like about them is the battery life
too short?
Yeah, I think only a few hours or so.
oh boy
Yeah. They came out with new models though, so it could be better.
I had an older version
and decided to switch to the A40 TRs instead
why did you get both that and a mic?
Alright, mic it is then
I had 2, albeit cheap, headsets in the past and they felt like they'd squeeze my head
Yeah, I've had that before ๐
Astro's are comfortable. I've heard Sennheiser's are worth it too
Yeah those non-gaming headphones are awesome
I got audio technica something something. Really dope
no mic tho ๐
I was so eager to play this game this weekend...
I've heard those are pretty good too
care to explain? instead of getting worked up about it?
scroll up?
tried everything I can think of, my PC's ports are all open (DMZ), I've checked, NAT is unrestricted, etc
There's these steps, some of which you tried are in there https://help.ea.com/en-us/help/pc/connection-troubleshooting-advanced-pc/
Then not sure what's going on, on your end.
I haven't had any issues connecting, and get around the same speed you do, maybe a bit more.
@quartz canopy If i were in need of a new headset (Got Qpad QH90, what a master piece it is) I would go for these, Beyerdynamic Custom One http://tinyurl.com/y7ohxz63
Those look pretty nice as well
And whats really cool is that they have physical Acoustic bass control
I saw that 
na I fucking give up
lol
apparently trying to join games that put me in a queue before loading the map works...
wtf
I never tried that because why would I
but I just tried 3 and all worked? let's just hope this is a workaround
what do these mean? I get them constantly when playing the Beta
Upper one is variating ping
Bottom one os low framerate
Yellow is minor
Red is severe
are the connection issues EA related or personal
cheers. take it this isn't happening to everyone then? Never had this problem with previous battlefields
actually the framerate is my fault. still using a GTX660
done me ok up till now but probably need to repalce
i like how this beta gradually gets worse
instead of gradually better like other betas lmao
day 1 everything was fine
If you could upgrade either the FX 8320e or the 380x 4GB, which one would you?
the 8320 of course
I figured, since it's the more expensive one to swap out -,- just getting a better GPU wouldnt help much probably since the CPU is the bottleneck right?
yeah whenever im in the open around much action it dips hard, indoors etc its fine with around 60
inb4 its all the time. My 4770k @ 4.3ghz hits 60~70% load on average already, no idea how it's gonna be for your 8320
ohh damm
could it be GPU?
i know one thing for sure, my 280x won't cut it anymore
1080p @ minimum settings, explosions now dips my fps & same goes to moving around at open wide spaces
yeah pretty much the same here
VRAM is another issue too, glad bf v has a built in VRAM limiter, otherwise i'll be in for more test runs, prolly running bf5 at medium textures for muddy gloriousness instead of high textures haha
similar issue, but i presume it's my wifi connection for the time being. Sitting at around -60dbm-ish is ehhh
I did not even expect the game to be playable as I have less that minimum requirements
@pastel tundra
I had the same issue
just join servers that have [number] on them
so that they've got a queue
and it seems my 1100T is the bottleneck
then bottom of the screen will tell you in queue position and it will 100% work if it tells you that
shit :/
nothing online about this issue either
1h to finally join with friends to play together and then i cant deploy
inb4 all these issues will make it in the final build of the game
@charred basin like always dice / ea
I had similar connectivity issues with bf1 all the time lol
its like dice releases its first game
yeah every game
@charred basin turning DMZ on fixed everything for me
A common occurrence
If anyone is having an issue with stuttering even with a good rig,
The Best settings in Battlefield 5 + Battlefield 1 for performance and high fps ๐ Rate the video, thoughts in the comments and Subscribe for PC content! http...
@charred basin yes but it turns on vsync
@deft arch You are going to want to upgrade everything eventually
FX is old, dead, and never really worth it.
BFV is a CPU driven game
@steep gust hard words ๐
@steep gust I have a 144hz gsync monitor
so naturally I'd want that turned on anyways
with those auto ultra settings I run it 90-110fps just fine
imo BF games have always been amazingly well optimized graphically
gsync can cause issues with performance, just keep that in mind
what kind of performance problems?
ranges from screen tearing, lost frames and a few other things. The most common is input lag
I'm picky about input lag and immediately notice it and I can't say I ever did
no difference between PUBG gsynced input latency and BFV gsynced
and pubg I play competitively
I doubt you's notice 5-10ms
Then you have super human reaction times that beat everyone elses by 100ms
๐
everyone else as in the fastest in the world
yes, now you know who I am
average is 300-400ms, pro gamers are around 200ish
then your reaction time would be around 10 ms
yes but you were talking about difference
thats false
and also what the fuck, 3-400ms is 3-4seconds isn't it
0.3-0.4s is still a lot of fucking lag
@wet notch I'll pm you some links that actually disprove that
heck, even i tested myself when i was younger and i had 180-220ms reaction time
this is neurology research documents
maybe those neurologists should actually test ppl that game then ๐
100ms?
thats not surprising, but ppl underestimate the brain and the body working together
Not when it actually has to do with physics
i dont disagree with average ppl having 30-40ms reaction time, but playing FPS games, especially games like CS or quake will definately help out
30-40ms is faster than it takes for the electrical signals to hit the neurons in your brain
I was going to say that it was impossible
But pht said it better
Put 1 zero there and its probably correct
300-400 ms are still pretty good
100% focused on trying my hardest
there is no way FPS pros only have like 200-250ms reaction time
im 38 years old and has average reaction time at best
i tried that test and got 202ms
it's a lot more than just reaction speed to be a pro
yeah it is, but when it comes to shooter games, actual pros that live off it
^
nowadays they are very twitchy
still has so much more than only reaction speed
n0thing already said on stream that his reaction speed is lower than average
Being twitchy is more about muscle memory
than reaction speed
pro's know exactly where to move the mouse to aim somewhere
so the testing is flawed then
reaction speed might be the same as just an average joe
there's really no training reaction speed
everyone reacts to things happening on the screen usually as fast as an individual can
i agree, but we're talking about something very specific here,
someone see's something on screen, reacts to it and clicks
in that case yes
but its not like 50ms will make any difference in real life
and that test is on a red to green square
not on a brownish to gray situation
where someone peeked you
now only if I could tell what the difference between green or red were easier
can you rephrase that @prime jasper ?
I cant see the colors red or green very easily
oh no
I dont
just shoot everything that moves ๐
cant you just switch the colors out?
So I went from doing 3.0 on average in bf1, to going 1-30 on average in bf5
because the color blind mode doesnt do anything
cant kill an enemy if you cant see them
Oof
so its the models themselves?
that makes sense :/
Doesnt help
you'd love quake live or something then
im almost 100% certain colorblind mode will be an option in the main game
cuz there you can change enemy color on the actual models to whatever u want
There are colorblind options arent they?
pink, green, blue, brown etc
the issue isnt the nameplates, its the actual models
Shoot everything that moves
F
Still good tho
i guess it's ok
would probs improve once i get my 144hz monitor
You can se your % from the rest of people that took it
Even on low settings in Battlefield V, my GPU uses only 60% and seems to get bottlenecked by the CPU. I got a 970 and i5-4460
Really frustrating
well it is a 4th gen i5
its starting to be come a bit old
Imma better buy an i9 so my system doesn't get outdated already after some years

But seriously though. I've set everything off/to lowest and still it runs like dog shit. 50 fps with a 970 and i5-4460
i mean
6600k is min. requirement
can't expect to run latest tripple A titles on a 5 year old rig that was midrange at that time aswell
If I want to go for AMD as CPU, which is not the best option, I need to wait. If I wait, that CPU is their last AM4 socket (cause 3 years on 1 socket). Not going to buy a CPU that I cannot upgrade.
It's just fucking weird that my GPU load is on 60%, the fuck. Makes me think I'm on a fucking first generation CPU.
But since when did requirements take such a big step? Maybe it's optimization as well. Like.... a few years ago, 8GB was recommended, now it's 16 and soon it'll 32..
4c/4t doesnt cut it and it will get worse as time goes by
watch latest hardware unboxed cpu bf5 benchmark video
then you'll see
Midrange? Years ago, it was good to have an i5. An i7 is mostly only used for video editing because of the extra threads. But since the 8000 series that's not really the case anymore
Yes it was midrange
I have seen, but which one do you mean?
theres only one cpu benchmark bf5 video from steve
one sec
got narvik atm anyway so ๐ฉ
Battlefield V: https://amzn.to/2CrBMLo Check GPU prices now: GeForce GTX 1050 2GB: https://amzn.to/2AW7Nuk GeForce GTX 1050 3GB: https://amzn.to/2vVvWf4 GeFo...
there u go
Thanks man
np. honestly this is what gamers have been asking for years that games finally make use of more then 4 threads
its a good change
Yeah exactly. But my problem lays here at the moment, while I do want to upgrade:
https://discordapp.com/channels/140933721929940992/422598689928773632/488312615815348224
"If I want to go for AMD as CPU, which is not the best option, I need to wait. If I wait, that CPU is their last AM4 socket (cause 3 years on 1 socket). Not going to buy a CPU that I cannot upgrade."
Also, if I buy a 6-core CPU now, like a 8400, 9400 or Ryzen 2600, it'll be outdated in 2 years because games will use 8 cores... :|
I mean with a i5 4460 you don't really seem like the type of guy that upgrades his CPU on the same platform every year or so
But your argument is valid however
1151 socket is pretty much dead at this point
9900k will most likely be the last iteration on that 14nm platform
1151? The 4460 isn't 1151 but 1150
Oh okay sorry
Hmm, I'm thinking about 144Hz 1080p gaming as well if I want to upgrade. Is an i7 still a must then?
But hmm, the 8400 scores better than 8700K in benchmarks
Not a must, but Frostbite engine makes great use of more threads now and so are starting other engines. i game at 1080p 144hz and just recently made the upgrade from a 6600k to a 6700k
and that money was well spent, my 1% lows increased quite significantly nd my max pushes aswell. But i run 1080ti and high mhz ram so my gpu was starving
I see
Let's say this, if you're a gamer through and through that does edit a occasional youtube video every month or so, go intel
If you do lots of rendering and other cpu heavy work and game on the side, go AMD
Yeah I know, but at the moment I just play a lot of F1 and Battlefield 4 sometimes
Unless you use adobe premier, then use intel
Just sometimes VMs, but not much
because premier still has issues with ryzen
more like premiere is making use of the igpu on intel based systems to increase render performance
if you have latest patch
but regardeless
Check what your budged is, see your usecase and then just go for it
Anyway, I'm also talking with some other people. Guy says it's better to upgrade in 2019
I don't really have a budget, but I'm not willing to spend thousands of euros just for gaming
Yeah
So that's gonna be a big step hopefully
So I think it's pretty 'nonsense' to upgrade now instead of waiting. Heard that Navi (or was it Ryzen 3) is still coming this year
Navi is AMDs upcomming GPU architecture
And Ryzen 2 will be the new AMD CPU Lineup based on 7nm
Ryzen, Ryzen+, Ryzen2
actually
might be wrong hang on, checking
Yea you're right about namingscheme
but ye, i know what you meant :D
I'm in such a difficult position. I'm starting to hate Nvidia because of their dominant position (asking any price they want, forcing people to have an account on Experience and other shitty, nasty moves). Makes me want to move to AMD for the GPU, but Nvidia is still leading with performance. Hope that Navi significantly changes this.
For CPU, I think it's good for me to upgrade to Intel, still. Unless Ryzen2 will be really good. Cause like you said: I'm not really that guy that upgrades every 2 years, so that means I need to switch socket anyway when I want to upgrade.
What do you think?
A lot depends on your budget really. Navi i don't have high hopes honestly. It's gonna be more perf/watt efficient but will be basically a Vega with higherclocks and less wattage, so not super competitive from a performance standpoint.
And Nvidia, well. Pascal is still a very good performer even with RTX gpus on the Horizon
I can recommend buying used GPUs no problem to safe a buck or two
I bought my 1080ti just 3 weeks ago for 540โฌ
used, 1 1/2 years warranty left.
Yeah so I can go for a secondhand GPU and new CPU you mean?
Yeah, warranty will be a thing though
Woah, seeing a Inno3D 1080Ti for 540 euros
It's 12 months old ๐ค
Hope it wasn't used for mining
Like i said, depends on your budget really. I swap out GPU and CPUs around a lot throughout the year and buy a lot of parts used, never had issues if you buy with warranty and trusted sources.
You'll most likely looking at a completely full buy aka no parts able to reuse from your old rig.
So personally i'd buy everything new just to have that peace in mind
And don't cheap out on the RAM. mhz speed matters these days
;)
I don't really have a budget like I said. I just want the best price/performance and I'm not willing to spend thousands of euros just for a bit of 1080p gaming (probably at 144Hz though) :p.
Yeah I know. I've seen that video of Linus a while ago. Saw that (at that time) 2666MHz was the best way to go, unless you want a few fps more.
should be 3000/3200mhz these days for sure
Lol, any recent benchmarks?
What's next? 64GB, 24-core and 4000MHz RAM for 1080p gaming? 
Well it scales up to 3600mhz basically. but most decent ram these days is 3000/3200mhz anyway and one step cheaper is like 5โฌ difference for a 400mhz drop.
So why not just spent 5โฌ more ya know
Different for each game. Here are some Benchmark from a Year ago for each Platform.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - http://amzn.to/2pdov1p AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - http://amzn.to/2ooXQxT G.Skill FlareX DDR4 Memory: http://amzn.to/2nQa7aD Support us on Patreon...
Check prices now: https://goo.gl/Mb78Ro Kaby Lake DDR4 Memory Guide, Scaling Performance Tested VIDEO INDEX 0:00 - Intro 0:41 - What DDR4 do you need? 1:29 -...
But first, do you think in 2019 I should go for AMD or Intel? I know you don't have a special magic ball, but then I know which video to watch :p
Cause I can go secondhand yeah for the GPU, but CPU-wise it's going to be a question
Ryzen
Intel
So you dont have to watch all that stuff if ur not interested
Alright so if i were you
and i don't have 2k โฌ on hand to buy a new rig
And you're not the type of guy that updates regulary his gpu every 2 and CPU every 3 years.
Then you'd be either looking at a Ryzen platform, preferably the upcomming 7nm CPUs in Q1 2019, and a used 1080/1080ti at that point
Or if you wanna spend a bit more money, wait till october and buy the new 9xxx series from intel
and buy a 1080/1080ti used
and then upgrade that once nvidia releases 7nm for the masses
Both options however require budget at around 1200+โฌ i'd say, roughly.
I wouldn't go lower then that considering your upgrade cycle is rather long it seems like
I have R5 1600 & a GTX 1060 6gb ๐
oh man all this talk here ๐ฉ
@real bramble Thanks for your reply. Do you think a Ryzen2 would be enough for 1080p 144Hz? Cause the IPC of Intel is still leading though
Upgrade to the 3000 series you mean? Man, that'd be 800 euros for a 3060 :P
Depends reallly. if you wanna push on a 144hz screen with 1080p intel def. the better choice
I see
Do you think an Intel + secondhand 1080Ti would run 144Hz pretty well? My friend has that setup, but I think I need to upgrade pretty quickly again then, after 1 or 2 years
You can run Rzyen2 at 1080p 144hz
Intel does edge it out depending on the game but its generally 1-10fps
I don't Rzyen 3 will beat Intel in single core performance, so Intel will be always be best for max fps
But for 144Hz I don't think it matters much, does it? Damn, G-Sync monitors are so much more expensive than FreeSync :|
my pc have 2gb ram nvida icore 7 and 8gb ram but i am raming in your battlefield 5 gys
i will not buy the game if you not optimize thegame please
my head hurt reading that
maybe 2gb vram and 8gb ram, still no idea what gpu though lol
my bet is on a gtx760
or 670
Could also be a Toaster with a 2gb ram stick slapped onto it
yes
Operating System: Windows 10 Pro, 64-bit
DirectX version: 12.0
GPU processor: GeForce 840M
Driver version: 399.07
Direct3D API version: 12
Direct3D feature level: 11_0
CUDA Cores: 384
Core clock: 1029 MHz
Memory data rate: 1800 MHz
Memory interface: 64-bit
Memory bandwidth: 14.40 GB/s
Total available graphics memory: 6105 MB
Dedicated video memory: 2048 MB DDR3
System video memory: 0 MB
Shared system memory: 4057 MB
I am playing welll battlefield 1 75 fps max
anyone else having major troubles joining your friends or queueing together in the open beta?
pc origin
Ok, but we are having problems even joining squads in the main meny
menu
not showing any squads when we join a friends squad
in the bottom right corner
wot, that 14GB/s of memory bandwidth
I've got the 7700k and stock 1080
144hz gsync monitor and everything set automatically to max
90-110 fps, drops when there's a ton of shit going on but to 70 max
so imo the game is pretty well optimized graphically
I have an 8700k and 1080ti, I play on low. The game isnt very stable right now, I get lows of 20 a lot
must be a bug on your end
lowest ive gone is 150fps
and i play on low aswell
maybe u had something running in the background?
nope nothing
my game also crashes a ton
did a fresh install
still crashes after about 5 minutes in
halp.
game lags and i dunno why.
My Specs:
Intel Core i5-4460 CPU @ 3/20GHz
10,0GB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 1060 6GB
i play on low aswell.
cpu will not be enough
there's more to that
ah nevermind my previous text, was supposed to be a reply to a older text
kk.
@prime jasper if you can get a new CPU, do get an 4770/4790
@prime jasper get an i7
this game hammers my 4770k, which is already clocked at 4.3ghz. I get on average of 70%~80% cpu load
wouldn't be surprised to see your 4460 getting pegged at 100% load at all times while the game runs
cheapest upgrade is the 4770 / k
lad its fuckin 20:27 and im searching for a new PC..the fuck am i doing with my life ?
its sunday
yeah.
and the next day i have skool.
lad the cheapest intel core i7 is this:
Intelยฎ Coreโข i7-8700 Coffee Lake, 3.2GHz, 12MB
no you can't use an 8700 into ur current motherboard
unless you happen to have some ddr4 ram & a lga1151 (skylake/kabylake coffeelake)
do take note! Despite the fact that all three Skylake, Kabylake & Coffelake CPU's uses the same socket number, the Coffelake CPU's cannot use motherboards for Skylake & Kabylake CPU's! Likewise for the opposite
you can use skylake and kabylake on z370 platform
@sage pollen The first and most important thing to do is checking that everyone is online in the ORIGIN clients chat, if it says "Offline" youre gonna have a bad time.
Lmao you're gonna have a bad time
I got a Ryzen, 8700k is better for gaming, but I do a lot of multi-tasking etc. so this Ryzen is a beauty

@queen field my 8600k @4.9ghz gets slammed to 100% across all 6 cores
It's a CPU driven game
@real bramble You can it's just not recommended
Does it have to do with hardware?
And use the bug report where ever it is
Possibly but you first have to tell us 
Yeah that doesn't have to do with hardware
That has to do with the filter on chat
Use the feedback tool
Do you realize we don't care?
I haven't
This channel has to do with PC tech not a place to complain about chat filters
Titanfall 2 was an amazing game that was killed by a bad release date, but ok.
Try to use the channel for it's intended purpose. I'm sure if you want to complain about a chat filter you'll be well received in a different server 
what's up with the toxicity
if you want to complain about the chat filter make a feedback post to -> https://forums.battlefield.com/en-us/categories/battlefield-v-open-beta
it's a shame that games make people so angry
we'd probably come along with this individual better if i for example spoke in R6 discord
seriosly?
shame that a certain games makes you feel upset :/
I really can't change your opinions on anything what so ever
but try to keep it civil
alright
I'm banned from the R6S server so you'll have to do it yourself 
apparently
it's a shame that a video game can get people that salty as he is but oh well
back to tech issuees
ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
Hess with the abuse 
yeah
will we be able to disable TAA in the full game ?
I would imagine that yes
Guys Quadcomm > Intel / AMD
That should start a fight 
wouldn't make sense to not have that
i hope so
You might be able to force it in the config

I wonder if I could squeeze out some free frames by going to 5.0ghz
But I like my 4.9ghz at 1v that is technically 1.22v due to turbo 
"turbo" beeing LLC kicking in to keep your cpu stable under vdrop
regardeless, that's quite good voltage for 4.9ghz
๐
So i can run BFV on all ultra with 70+ fps but BF1 runs like 30-40 on mid settings. How can i fix BF1?
i remember at launch i had like 90+ frames on ultra
but a few updates later it's now unplayble
Is dx12 on
This sounds more like a different issue than gamerelated
halfing fps and going from ultra down to medium that is
No
BFV runs smooth
"i remember at launch i had like 90+ frames on ultra"
DX12 is off
Hmmm
Yeah HDR is off
That setting always causes me lag
Yeah everything is off
@real bramble That isn't what vdroop is
It's a combination of adaptive voltage and turbo power limit being set to unlimited 
vdroop is when you set your CPU to let's say 1.5v in the BIOS and it only gets 1.4v when you check something like cpuz
I didnt said it was vdrop
i said its LLC kicking in to keep your CPU stable under the vdrop that occurs under heavy load
Should I turn off chromatic aberration effect?
Yes
I haven't even tweaked the BIOS around since I'm lazy and just use XTU
I'll set it to 1v / 4.9ghz in the BIOS when I get to my PC to see if it'll post
@prime jasper That they are. Still doesn't work properly
@sage pollen If everyone got someone in their team you can't try sterting, if everyone sees the timer it's cool
@prime jasper yes we see the timer but when the leader connects to the server the rest gets "failed to connect to the server, no reservation found" or something similar
Yo does anyone think I need an upgrade from an I5 7400 to play this smoothly? I kinda struggle to run the beta at 60fps rn
What's your GPU?
1060 6GB
Hm I turned everything down to low and locked at 60, it'll stay there mostly but it does have dips
Do you have V-Sync on?
Yeah
What's your monitor's refresh rate?
120hz
Have you tried locking it to a different FPS?
Yeah it locked at 50 and similar thing happens, same with BF1
Lock it at a higher FPS?
I'll try that again, thing is it will have big dips in fps
Lock it at your monitor's refresh rate if 200 doesn't work
Also enabling DX12 mode seems to help a lot
The GTX 1060 supports DX12 so you should be fine
Also, try turning V-Sync off
And set the framerate lock to 200
See if that works
Yes to run it smoothly you need a better CPU
Arighty I'll check that
O = off
I = on
Okay cheers
Yeah I was thinking I need 6-8 cores but not sure atm
Oh well thatโs not your cpu
Oof, they were up a second ago
Are they down?
Idk I'll restart
They were down for me just then
They're back (I think)
oh yeah, they are back for me
@autumn vigil dx12 negatively affects performance in bfv
Yeah, I realised I had it off so I turned it on and it started stuttering
Happened in BF1 as well
But in BF1 it made the menus unusable
I have an 8600k overclocked to 4.9ghz and a 1080
With dx11 I always get above 100fps and around 120 average
With dx12 it'll drop below 100fps
Oof
@steep gust Turn of shader memory in and/nVidia
hum dice need see this topic some have probm not many men have 4 gb ram
Hmmm
You are wrong
8 is the standard if you want to game
And basically all recent games have minimum as 8 gbs
@prime jasper boi lay off the weed and buy ram
@charred basin Hu? When you aree using DirectX 12 you are recomended to disable such features
@prime jasper I'm not entirely sure that I understand what you said, but 8 GB is the absolute MINIMUM you need to play BFV
All modern titles require 8GB
At least
@sour ivy ho soory i talk to the nvdia card i have 2 gb and 8gb ram
8gb is the min to game IMO
16gb is a little excessive but it's starting to see use
Ok
@prime jasper even if you would disable settings in Nvidia control panel
DX12 would not give more fps over DX11
Dice needs to better optimize for DX12
What card do you have?
1080 decently overclocked
its not normal it better naw to use ps4 500 euros
its normal you cant laging at any game white 6gb ram gys @steep gust
What
uhm wat
you have the titan x nvida
Titan X is old 
so you cant have problem for run any game
1080ti is better for gaming
Titan Xp > 1080ti
you have 4 gb ram right ?
16
holly shit
1080ti is bad 
like my potatos pc
Its nothing special 
[Display]
Operating System: Windows 10 Pro, 64-bit
DirectX version: 12.0
GPU processor: GeForce 840M
Driver version: 399.07
Direct3D API version: 12
Direct3D feature level: 11_0
CUDA Cores: 384
Core clock: 1029 MHz
Memory data rate: 1800 MHz
Memory interface: 64-bit
Memory bandwidth: 14.40 GB/s
Total available graphics memory: 6105 MB
Dedicated video memory: 2048 MB DDR3
System video memory: 0 MB
Shared system memory: 4057 MB
Video BIOS version: 82.08.14.00.68
Oof laptop
yes
2GB of ddr3 for vram 
OOF
that's not quite as bad
But still potato
You won't be playing battlefield on that lol
i can play weell all game but only battefield 5
My spec list is
8600k @4.9ghz and 4.3ghz on cache
16gb of DDR4 3000mhz / CL18
Asus Rog Strix 1080 overclocked to around 2000mhz on core and like 11000 on memory
I average around 110-120fps at max settings in BFV
yes great gys i have medium config at 88 fps
You realize it's a laptop?
Yes
yes gys
So its probably at like 900p
yes
Doesn't matter
Yes it does
I'm saying he still can't run it
BFV is a very CPU driven game
i using 1300x
I'm not saying it doesn't make a difference
His CPU isn't that bad
n
It's a dual core
Oof
And that resolution is slightly above 720p
I still don't see that running at 80 fps on MEDIUM LOL
Ok?
its only on btf1 but btf 5 22 fps
A 8350 can't even run at low
you have great config @steep gust gys you can play gys
I find that hard to believe
he was getting 40 on low
PCs have a lot of variables
I'm aware
If he doesn't have enough RAM that is like a 20% drop in performance
16gb
Of DDR3
Duh
R290, 4670k, 8GB DDR3 @80fps with medium to high settings'
It shouldn't be
At least the 660 has DDR5
well, I have locked the frame-rate
Oh it's one of those stupid nvidia laptop GPUs that they put ddr3 in 
So its stabl e 80
Yes
Thanks nvidia
;O
They enjoy the lack of competition don't they 
AMD failed to do anything to team Green with vega
Which is a shame because I'd love for Nvidia to get the same treatment as Intel did
how much more do you guys think the game will get optimized for release?
Remember kids that Intel said 6 core (and 8) CPUs were impossible without a larger die that X99 / X299 offered
It's well optimized already
Bugs will be fixed
or so i heard, but do you think they will try even further?
Hopefully
my i5-7600 is doing ok but is suffocating a little bit
Probably not
DX12 needs some love
drops to 40s at times
I don't like when I drop below 100


Posted this earlier ```My spec list is
8600k @4.9ghz and 4.3ghz on cache
16gb of DDR4 3000mhz / CL18
Asus Rog Strix 1080 overclocked to around 2000mhz on core and like 11000 on memory
I average around 110-120fps at max settings in BFV ```
use direct x 11 gys
Yeah, we know
So yeah when I drop below 100fps at 1080p I die inside
I guess it should be, I was just hoping I would be able to maintain a steady 60 everywhere at least on low
It probably should be getting 60
like for some strange reason I see barely any FPS differences between low-mid-high settings
That's because it's your CPU struggling
I'm guessing you don't have the unlocked version?
Not your GPU
yeah ik
so that's why I was wondering if potentially any further optimizations would help CPU usage
that's kinda the deal breaker for me when it comes to buying the game, unless I manage to upgrade my CPU beforehand
@steep gust @sour ivy my second pc its a laptop again alienware 15 r2 but my game run at 30 fps
DirectX version: 12.0
GPU processor: GeForce GTX 970M
Direct3D API version: 12
Direct3D feature level: 12_1
CUDA Cores: 1280
Core clock: 924 MHz
Memory data rate: 5010 MHz
Memory interface: 192-bit
Memory bandwidth: 120.24 GB/s
Total available graphics memory: 7117 MB
Dedicated video memory: 3072 MB GDDR5
I was looking forward to the 20XX series of GPUs
But NVIDIA can kill themselves if they think I'll drop that much money on a new one, specifically the 2080ti
So don't?
But thats the point of what I'm saying?
You realize how much money they spent on R&D?
And they are a company that wants to make money
Ok
On another note
How much fps would I probably get on BF5 with everything on max, with my setup?
Well download the beta
And see for yourself
But a lot
The only limiting factor I can see is your ram
speaking of the 20XX series, my friend plans to get a build with 2 of them paired with 64GB RAM and some other stuff
why? because he has too much money
lmao
That's interesting
Hmm im kinda thinking of it
Bigotry
that's fucked up
Yeah graphics will look nice but there's no real benchmarks as for now
so messed up
@steep gust where u get that min/recommended list from, that is so wrong
Jfc, 3gb/4gb VRAM as recommended? I can't wait to see the complaints of game feeling laggy even at medium settings
Its from dice
@prime jasper 8gb of RAM is gonna hurt
@obtuse yew and why go Rzyen if you have too much money
The new i9s should come out soon, so get the new gen top of the line 7980XE replacement and give it 128gb of ram
$2000 in RAM for your probably $3000 CPU
I9

I told him he could save some money by you know, just getting one 2080ti and like 32 RAM but nope xD
32gb of RAM is excessive for gaming
64GB is overkill for about any workload
128gb has like one workload that can take advantage of it
True balls to the wall would be the 8th or 9th gen (whatever Intel goes with) flagship X299 CPU with 128GB of RAM with dual 2080TIs
Also toss in a $1500 custom loop
Im planning on buying a 2018 ti if it comes that it has a good performance
Benchmarks will come eventually
Driver support is also super important
But it already out of stock from nvidia
Tip: if you have a 4460 and want to play BF5, throw it out of the window as far as you can
It's bad for my blood pressure, that thing 
Can be repurposes for other uses, IE a streaming machine or a FTP server
Repurposed*
I'll sell mine probably
@queen field What CPU?
@steep gust huh?
hi all. i have a problem. i rent Origin Access yesterday.
and now i should have BF4 premium
but, whenever i start the game and try to join a premium server, it tells me i need to install following expansions and lists single or several expansions of premium
i have premium and if i click repair, it re-installs all the expansions
but it doesnt help, i cant play
its not recognized by the game
and they are not listed as installed and i cant click anywhere to "install" them
also the game is listed as "premium edition" in origin
i tried restarting origin and my laptop aswell, nothing helps
please if possible someone help me ^^
I would suggest contacting Support
how do i contact support?
@plain quiver https://help.ea.com/en/contact-us/
@plain quiver make sure you have all the DLC downloaded
@queen field for those benchmarks
BFV is very much a CPU bound game 
Ooof, 840M ๐

how big of a waste would it be to get a K variant CPU on a non-overclockable motherboard?
hmm makes sense i guess
I have Ryzen so I can OC ;3
But I don't because I have the wraith cooler and I dont want my CPU to approach 90C
yeah 90C doesn't sound very good lol
Right now it gets close to 70 in game
my i5-7600 is struggling a little bit on this game unfortunately :/
unless they somehow optimize more for CPUs on release, i kinda want to get a new one
Rip, i5s arent good for modern BF games, especially the old ones
I have 6C/12T so im good
@steep gust yes, I'm aware of that, why? 4770k of mine almost hits 80% average load lol
@keen verge no my dude, unless you're ok with downscaling, possible to run BF5 @ 768p/720p render resolution
I play at 1080P with mostly high except things like undergrowth, shadows, effects and post process
playing bf5 @ 1080p with everything at lowest except for textures 
:C
280x checking in
1060 6gb checking in
looking at used market now, i see a 1070 for 350 usd now
and a rx 580 8gb for 250 usd atm
I paid 300 for the 1060
prices of gpu's are dipping hard now
I have a 960 sitting in a box back home
hey its me ur bro
nah jk, that gpu performs head 2 head when compared against my 280x
I gave my lil bro until christmas to save for a PC and he can have the 960 or else imma sell it
like what you did, personally I always see spare parts to be either sold for extra funds or spare parts to another pc, no point keeping
Although people are wanting to give like $50 for it, people these days
lol
It is worth atleast 100
ultra low ball
yeah
280x are sold for around 90usd, i understand that
its a power hungry card that performs like an 960
Its the EVGA SSC version of the 960
@_@
dont think the factory oc seem to affect prices much for these cards anymore
unless they're from a previous gen like the 1000 series
lul i want a gt 610 now
Idk how 960 performs with BFV because I used it in the 1st alpha which was so unoptimized so I had to drop everything to low and 900P, lol
BF never shows story in the beta, that is for release :3
i did the storyline of the "u are not expected to survive etc etc" that made me go woooohhhh & story of black bess & the crew during open beta, it was great
hahaha
what if
they have yet to even write the script for battlefield V storyline
Story is never in the beta for any BF game
i didnt even have origin subscription
You can play the story in the trial
@steep gust well, about downloading the expansions - they show up as owned by me, but in the menu i dont have the option to download the expansions its strange
@queen field Ok. Tq for the info.
its like as if the installation was never finished for ALL expansiosn even the free ones
can someoen help me?
whats the reasoning behind this nonsense?
probably RTX GPUs
can't really think of anything else
bad or not they're new
so older stuff becomes cheaper
no i mean they ramped way back up again
$650 for like the week of announce week and then maybe poorly received so everyone jacked prices back up? lol
meh, guess ill wait for stupid 2070 benchmarks even if its post BF:V release
@plain quiver you sure you dont just have the content downloaded already? i thought Battlefield 1 installed everything the same for everyone regardless of unlocked status
Because RTX is a shill
No one I know who plays games are switching to the 20XX series due to the price to performance, except for those that are massive gaming rig whales
Majority of people Ik are upset with the 20XX series, so ig they were being sold off & dropped down from price due to crypto becoming almost worthless to mine, but the 20XX series flopped, most decided to hold onto their older cards & wait out the next gen, instead of selling them all off like everyone thought would happen
I'm one of those people, I was 100% looking forward to a 20XX card, but it disappointed me, so I'll hold onto my GTX1070ti until the series after the 20XX & hope its better
I was thinking about it today bc I was listening to the pc gamer show, and they made a good point bc one of the host was like 'why make it when ray tracing isn't standard and 4k gaming still isn't the norm?'
and another said 'well, it's the creation of GPUs which have the ability to do these things that stimulates their growth'
which i thought was a good point
but I bought a GTX 1080 when prices were slightly inflated still so i'm a bit salty
lol
๐ก
Holy shit, an entire squad just got blown to the after life in front of me in BF1 by a bomber in the very start of this conquest match
Revived the entire squad
See, this is why medic is good in BF1, I like this
Can't do that in BF5
Ummm, #battlefield-legacy-titles ๐
wow, smh
/ban


