#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages Ā· Page 3212 of 1
sup
Was playing with someone i knew who is a plane main and someone got so salty it was insane
oof
he kept sending him messages that he is too dogshit on the ground when i looked at both their stats and he is better on the ground then that guy


is ribeyrolles good weapon?
Ye
Yes, especially when the bipod is deployed
ok thanks
Its a good, easy to control weapon
Be me, playing BF4
Someone on the other team asks if I'm single
Random squad mate says "She's in my squad, fap"
Obi-Wan_So_Uncivilized.jpg
Sometimes one starts to wonder how some guys just stop functioning when playing with women
It's like there wasn't a war happening in the first place
Don't get how people can act this way
Humans are weird
It's down to how people feel they can get away with a lot more when online
So they do anything they want without nearly as many societal boundaries
Because they are
@cyan oar Keep the conversation here on the topic of battlefield.
im new i just joined though i didnt know that Humans are weird, was about battlefield lol
Are servers down
It keeps saying connecting
They should have added Singapore as a conquest map in BF4
As huge battle at the changi airport with hangars beside the runways
When im online i just try to treat everyone as normal as possible
I don't even go into game chat unless I hear others speaking which makes me want to co-operate and get to know them better
Well that was in text chat... don't think I'd be able to stand VC with those 2
Sheesh
Oh well, not the end of the world
Yeah, we are all cooped inside after all
Not yet at least. Not till the Sturmtiger rolls up.
The sturmtiger isn't op
Its horrifying
Sturmtiger? Yeah it's horrifying
But not op
sturmtiger is good but u need to be like at least 25 meters from ur oponent tank if u wanna kill him
and its annoying that u are turning around all the time cause someone wants to blow up u with dynamite
and its obviously super mega hard to kill speed wheels tank like greyhound
I once matched the speed of a greyhound driving in circles with my turning tiger hull
I find that I need supporting players for me to use the tank effectively
Did you know that the sturmtiger takes the least from its own shell
During al sundans release, in which is was glitches where even allied tank destroyers would spawn infinite sturmtigers
So an entire squad can get their own sturmtiger
DWOOOOOSH
DWOOOOOOOSH
DWOOOOSH
DWOOOOOOSH
Bods wtf
i like trolling planes at al sudan
I remember spotting a support player and 2 seconds later a sturmtiger shell flying to him
You're always in disc
Im always in disc?
What does that mean
I survived a direct sturmtiger hit on 1 health and destroyed the sturmy boy...
Your disc
how do you get that weapon skin
JƤger?
is that how its called?
Yes, jts in the store
can i buy it with in game currency
That hand looks awful
Its 1500 boins for the same skin on every gun
Look that hand makes me uncomfortable as well but thinking of it, it makes sense
No worries!
Im always in disc?
@prime pine Always in the bfv discord
Mod tryouts
I gotta be here
what is the best gun in the game right now
assault class
stg 44 doesnt feel great anymore
Try the stg 1-5
Mk47 is nice as fuck
In BF4 are there server with boost XP ?
Its possible
the most realistic way of doing that https://youtu.be/N898VvIVvXs
not even worth fighting that lol
How many times you have said this
Jk man
it's because when you're in a sherman , you never fight a tiger head on, first instinct is to escape
hahahahahaha
My first instinct is flanking
in that video I didn't even think I'd survive escaping
in that open field
so i went right in front of it
yea you could do that if you're in a light tank
Run and recuperate
I know from experience too. German laugh
First time trying the greyhound
I find a tiger
We look eachother
And he kills me
If you don't play the objective
I play heavies because I am more aggressive
okay
Hello
Hello
Hello
man i hate it when squad mates dont understand basic tactics
like just now i played a great game on marita, we're defending on last sectors, I'm using the rooftops on the last sector really shredding ppl
but wherever I go squad mates spawn on me and stay there
like standing up on rooftops the morons
Well, what were you expecting or blueberries? 
Or green beans in this case...
That's when you unsquad
i was seriously considering that ngl
they were just playing the decoy/bait role. you had to pop the heads of the people that were firing upon them š®
It's free real estate kills! 
Talking about kills
Whenever I play tanks
And check the scoreboard I always feel like I have more kills than I remember
I had 97 kills somewhere the other night, didn't even realize it
Like, the splash damage from your main cannon damaged some enemies, then someone else finished them off.
New challenge, get 100 kills solely through assists
It's not the assist that counts as kill
Like actual kills
Because I barely have assist while tanking
Could be because there would be multiple players in a single vehicle you destroy. I dunno.
Could be
Or he just gets a lot of kills?
Anyone know what day the weekly map rotation change on BF1 ?
Canāt wait to see more level 0s with snipers they shouldnāt have š
Time for Xbox players to farm Game Pass newbs.
You know it mate, you know it
Of course, that also means you'll be getting Game Pass newbs on your team too.
Oh god
"Why is our team so shit?!"
Half of your team has rank 0s.
"O" š
Iāll have to deal with being teamkilled constantly
Iām a hardcore player and itās gonna be hell...
Assuming newbies are even brave enough to play Hardcore servers.
DICE is creating our next Battlefield game with never-before-seen scale.
I probably missed the discussion when this statement was announced. We don't want to speculate too hard because that will just give us unrealistic expectation. But maybe we can assume that the next Battlefield game will have more than 64 players in a match?
Because it's hard to imagine "never-before-seen scale" as being exclusive to map size. Bigger maps + 64 players might end up with boring Conquest matches because there would be much less engagements.
or it's just buzzwords to make investors happy
or it's just buzzwords to make investors happy
actually all the battlefields will be on game pass
it's probably just a vague marketing thing atm
they say it for every game, basically all it means is 'some aspect of the game has been improved' lol
the only thing I care about is that it is modern
As long as the sniping is good Iām gonna be happy lol
Battlefield: revolutionary war
aka battlefield 17 for no good reason at all
or actually 16 with a roman numeral I
Knowing dice itāll be Battlefield IX or some crap
As long as the sniping is good Iām gonna be happy lol
@tired owl what do you think is good sniping?
Smooth scope in times, a good powerful rifle and a good few attachments. Thatās good sniping to me
i guess what bf title do you think has the best sniping
BF4 has the best sniping to me at the moment
.
it's big update or something?
attachments are fun but usually lead to picking the same for every gun
Hi
Ello
I am playing BF4 but i am on port with pac and irish. And no cinematic scene and i cant jump to sea. some thing wrong?
Mission: get on the boat.
could I send any of you my bf4 clips? looking for some appreciation or judgment
most players? i would still assume bfv
bf1 and bf4 are probably not far behind though
im na west and i consistently see at least 10 full conquest servers
do you play bf1 ?
You searching for players?
no

I was waiting for Grav to send his little mesage again
Yeah
Because dlc maps on bf1 do be oof
Gotta help them players lol
Polo
Lol
I do
which one ?
i hardly play an bf lately, if i do its bfv
oh ok
Gimme a Mosin and a Spiked Club and I'll dance all my way to MVP š
Fuck yeah boys B2B ops on BF1
need regular or boost to post images

Oh well š
B2B is free peacekeeper kills
I think the Howdah sweeper would be very effective as well
Hm
Bf4 anyone
Oh no
!!lfg @wicked mason
ā¹ Looking for Players to play with?
Head over to the Looking For Games channel category.
Please remember to state your region when looking for players to play with!
#lfg-pc #lfg-xbox #lfg-playstation
My bad
no worries
Iām new
well welcome to bfd
Not a lot of people play bf4 anymore huh
Not many ps4?
Not on PS4 so not a clue
Not really
Well I also have a Xbox but idk if Iād have to start over or if thereās a way to transfer accounts
I mean you can find some servers
Well I also have a Xbox but idk if Iād have to start over or if thereās a way to transfer accounts
@wicked mason Don't think there is mate
For a while my friends and I used to call the 38T the āYeet Tankā
Also am I the only who feels we should be able to turn the 38T in a Hetzer?
I need some help guys
What do you help with?
Whatchu want
So in battlefield 4 and 5 using a medium range scope zooms in all of your surroundings as well as the scope but is there a way to do it so itās just the scope zoomed in and not the whole screen?
No
Didnāt think so but thank you anyway bud
No problem
kinda hope we might get 3d scopes in the next game
where it just zooms what you see through the scope for lower magnifications
Omg its happening
that always seemed a bit milsim to me
!!when is the November update coming!?!
Soonā¢
It's not thiz week, but maybe nextt? :0
Zoomable scopes like with scrolling with middle mouse? Sounds good.
that always seemed a bit milsim to me
idk MW did it and it seems to work fine, i think its a nice effect
mw does it? i snipe all the time in that game and didnt notice it
yeah pretty sure the lower zoom scopes retain basically the normal zoom level outside of the actual sight
sniper scopes just cover the rest of the screen with an overlay like the x6s in bfv
Are there such things as hosted by non dice servers? If so how do I find them?
You mean servers?
pretty sure there arent servers like there were in the bf4 days where there were official and unofficial that you can just search and join
those are RSP right? and thats not a thing anymore
You would think after a while people would shoot down heavy bombers
All servers are hosted by EA/Dice
But no people are still getting like 8 kills per bomb run
Also unofficial servers are a bf4 thing
But there are servers that are "ran" by the community
I'm guessing they stopped it because you could boost on them
(Still hosted by ea/dice tho)
So technically not unofficial servers then
Could be one of the reaso
I just really hope that this new game is worth the wait
But the main one (according to them) is that they wanted a more unified experience
They didn't wany servers to be too out od their control
That one is fair
Yea it makes sense
I would personally release rsp tools after the games reached a certain age
It took them 2 years to somewhat balance the guns and even now they aren't perfect
So the community can still support it
What are RSP tools
5 isn't that bad
I disagree
But alas
Doesn't feeling like it was made with love
Just for money, it's strange
I mean it's a given considering its the area of battlepasses
Launch? Maybe
Now? Not so
I mean it really depends
Tanks can still sit on hills and snipe you 59 million miles away
Which people are starting to do in BF1
Or the stg which i would still consider broken - Maybe not as much but still somewhat.
The stg44?
Yes
It's not that op
Yes
There's your answer
bfv honestly has better weapon balance than the rest of the franchise lol
itās never been super bad honestly, other than in 5.2
The 338-Recon is a better Rifle that the M98B - Change My Mind.
ok?

Ok what guns do you use DrX?
like idk what thatās supposed to mean, does that make me inherently wrong or something?
like... all of them lmao
What's your gamertag?
i agree, bfv weapon balance has generally been good outside of first ttk change and 5.2
From the times I've played I've had generally more issues from certain guns
im almost willing to bet on certain scenarios
It becomes a pattern
i mean thereās going to be some guns that are more popular than others bc theyāre a bit easier to use
would you consider 2a op?
I don't feel like any gun is underpowered or basically a copy paste of another like in 1

@dense bone tbf since the latest updates, I haven't had poignant scenarios of its use, not as bad as others
@sour stratus what guns would you consider underpowered in bf1?
there are some that are a bit more niche and limited, but most of them you are basically able to do pretty well with as a good player
@solid hinge so what guns do you think are op?
ive only considered 3-5 guns throughout bfvs lifetime to actually be op
well originally definitely: stg, 2a, Ross, type 99 arisaka, m1a1 carbine, Lewis, mg42, most shotgun upgrades
@dense bone
Bf5s shit
Anyway
ehh, id only say stg was op of that list
Now bf1 had the same issue, apart from in bf5 some guns were extremely underwhelming like some of the AR's
Bf5 isn't that shit
2a was always a slower killing shotgun that added 10m to its range
BF5 is a good game, it's the players than can ruin it
but that still put it only effective up to 30m
Iād like to disagree
honestly the stg has never really been OP under normal circumstances, itās just a very manageable and versatile AR
Expose why you disagree then
I remember on one occasion I starting shooting before someone with an STG in close range (with an SmG) and they won, I didnt miss many shots
no idea how the ross or the arisaka are supposed to be OP lol
imo stg is a jack of all kind of gun, but a little TOO good at everything
@brave coral if it's too versatile, the. That's OP
not all smg are short range smgs
yeah maybe a touch but itās nothing crazy
That's the issue, it doesn't have many negative
you will easily lose a close up fight with a sten vs stg
But logically how does that make sense
its a game
Ok no
"logically" doesnt apply
Hmm I think the new cod would be your thing
itās not like the instant ez win gun, itās like āoh this gun is reasonably competitive at several rangesā
Which is fair
is that a low brow cod insult?
games dont make sense in the first place
100 health and bullet dmg that convernts into a numerical value based on factors is weird to begin with
thatās not unique to the stg, shot for shot i think every AR will beat a good 75% of the smgs in fairly short ranges
stg has decent btk/ttk up close
but it will get shredded by smgs that are close range specific
also from a ālogical perspectiveā it makes perfect sense for an assault rifle to kill fast up close
The onlu range ita better at is short range
itās a higher calibre round than an smg
And I wouldn't use it there either
yeah stg isnāt underwhelming by any means but itās not incredible either
theres a lot of ways to balance, idk why people think theres only 1 way
You either give it more damage or turn it into a water gun
š
From a new player perspective, I feel like BF1 is more balanced overall tban BFV. I get killed by way more different weapons on Bf1 than BFV
on xbox at least
well i played BF1942,vietnam and BF2 on pc back in the days but ive picked up BFV and BF1 2 weeks ago
BF1 has a lot of balance issues in my opinion, honestly. Metas are more present on BFV, but there are very few weapons on BFV that are wholly bad, something I cant say the same for in BF1
@queen canopy when you use a gun more often in bf1 you realise that guns are great at certain situations
There's more underperforming weapons honestly
But only some
And more copy paste than 5
X gun is only good in Y situation
Exactly @echo turtle
I'd rather not narrow down my choices to 'I gotta go long range' the whole time
Like the model A slug, i found out you could outgun infantry snipers if you got adequate enough
There's guns that do fine at all ranges once you learn them
BF1's gunplay is also fairly RNG based with the way recoil works
This guy was like "you're hacking" and I just said no, I've just learn how to this gun in its perfect environment
And the recoil is percentage
You can learn the recoil amounts from info websites
Doesn't bf1 have a system where a bullet can fuck off in a completely different direction
It does
I think it has actually
Like up percentage, left and right percentage
Hell yeah, rng is the best never hated it
But I haven't played in ages
That's like the occasional billet
There have been plenty of times where I see a bullet fly like a solid inch or two to the side of where my ironsights are
From a new player perspective, I feel like BF1 is more balanced overall tban BFV. I get killed by way more different weapons on Bf1 than BFV
@gentle swan pretty sure bf1 has a ton of guns that are the same though
Like on the buckhorn sights I've seen bullets fly outside of the buckhorns
That's still leaves a chance for one of your shots to not go where you want it to
BF1 has a bunch of copy paste too yeah
On top of that it's RNG
So you cannot safely predict when one of your bullets is going to go on vacation
@dense bone yeah, thats my point tho. In bf5 i get killed by the same 2-4 guns all the times. Bf1 even the same guns variant i see a lot more
Every game has a meta
thats kind of a moot point though isnt it?
BF1 has a bunch of mainstream meta weapons as well lol
why have 30 guns if 4 are used then
Its not different
Because they perform better than the others
@queen canopy that's because there is left and right recoil, which is realistic and it can be manageable eventually when you learnt the recoil percentages
delete the other ones then
@gentle swan Why have hundreds of variants when maybe 10-15 get used consistently
oh man the boys AT rifle in BF5 tat thing is a monster with hip fire and when u aim down sights and its a one shot
But still
ironically the most used weapons are hardly the best either
That would remove the variety also you would be stripping some people of their most used weapon
Just because a gun isn't used a ton doesn't mean it isn't a good gun
and more guns SHOULD be used given pros and cons but most people dont know better
@queen canopy mainstream weapons isn't a criticism, also it's not entirely true, there was an entire dlc about prototype guns
yeah StG gets used all the time when its really not that special of a weapon
dunno maybe i just like bf1 more over bfv
i hate bf1 mechanics
Like a 1/8 all of the guns weren't used in service, BUT where almost put in
Which is a stretch but still they were created around the time of the war
@solid hinge I'm not talking about prototype weapons, I'm talking about the amount of weapons/variants in the game that just don't get used ever
That's a minor issue
Not a big enough one to be unplayable
One gu n that is good but not used a lot is the FG-42 its a lmg but it has a bayonet
Also factory variants are better at handling recoil
But some do have unneeded variants I do agree
Its a minor issue on BF1, but when you apply the same thing to BFV, its a major balance issue? 
Because scoped variants add recoil
fg42 is a monster, but mag size sucks for large game mods
2-3 kills a mag is pretty rough
I remember trying to use the breta against other ar's and it was improbable of me to win, just because of balancing
That's why it's on support, they can get ammunition whenever you need/want it
thats not the concern though
its that you have 20-25 bullets in a mag
not how much you can carry around
breda is high ttk weapon if you can get 1 burst
so high skill floor
The Breda is a monster if you learn how to use it. Its a burst weapon, so naturally its going to take getting used to.
@dense bone fair enough, but when I started playing it's hard to get good when guns were unbalanced so badly
Yes 20 rounds is rough, but that's why the weapon has a learning curve, you benefit a lot more if you can control the recoil it also hits pretty hard
recoil control is easy really
Like try using a alright gun against a high powered unbalance gun early game and you can't learn to use it properly
its just held back by its range and mag size
I mean if you enjoy it play it but alas
It's still fine where it's at
ehh, some guns just need more effort
Like if wasn't early early game either it was like a year and a half in
if you cant take advantage of it and want to be efficient pick something that wroks
Effort ā Balance
effort is a way to balance
Thats what Im saying
idk i read "Effort ā Balance" as opposite
They should be somewhat balanced so you can gut gud
I guess I really meant Putting in effort ā Bad balance
And I always put massive amounts of effort into my games, I'm passionate about the franchise
this is where the "theres 50 weapons" comes in
theres almost something there for everyone
theres the easy to get going weapons (stg) and then theres weapons that take effort but have pay off (fg42)
You can. You just have to be able to use more than 3 braincells to learn how each some guns work. Theres a payoff for your effort there.
Throw all the variants out the window
There shouldn't be easy to get going because people abuse them to holy hell
they cant abuse easy if you learn the better pay off weapons and then you crush them
If they have the mental capacity to do so they'll move onto guns that work better for them
A gun can be easy to use to some while to others it is not
unless if the easy to use is easy recoil and they are a master at headshotting than yea, youre basically fucked
but not because of the weapon, but because of the users effort
The StG is an easy to use weapon, and as such is used fairly often. However, its not exactly stellar either. If people want to do better, then they usually use something different, and usually end up excelling with those weapons, past how they performed with the StG.
Which are harder to use? But then someone else has an easier time, I mean i like a challenge, but for the duration I played it just didn't seem fair
More effort should give you a better pay off
easier usually means slower ttk
I mean the game is bareable now
learn a harder weapon and you kill faster
Something like the Gewehr 43, or maybe even the M1A1 Carbine
But I'm talking like a year ago, when the game was meant to be in its prime
But there will always be weapons that are so good and so easy to pick up that other guns might lose their appeal
i dont really care to talk about a games state in the past, especially a year ago..
The M1A1 carbine is fairly mediocre unless you can learn to use the trigger finger, it can be like a 5 shot kill at mid range while being semi-auto. Its the firerate that makes it a really good gun and makes up for the sub-par semi auto damage. Once thats mastered, it can be hard to beat.
I'm sure Nyphon can speak for the Gewehr 1-5 as well, similar sort of thing in a harder-hitting package
My point is that when I was playing the game it really felt unbalanced and playing was unenjoyable, meaning I didn't have time to practise because it wasn't fun
i do consider g1-5 op though
it requires a little extra effort to get huge gains out of it
And now I could but eh I can't deal with tanks on hills lol
Tell your bf5 friends to stop bringing it to bf1 š
When did you last play BFV, if I may ask? @solid hinge
@queen canopy just after the big large update where they semi fixed stuff, I would say like 3 months ago
Probably sooner
Hello
I played it for a week 2 weeks ago and im good at shooters, my performances were abysmal, different story with bf1
@gentle swan Thats because BF1 and BFV play completely differently, you're going to have to actually learn one or the other
i dont know what it is but bfv just feel off
@solid hinge Not really...the gunplay mechanics are completely different between the two games.
bfv has recoil patterns, bf1 is spread based
Two completely different feels
????
what I mean is BF1 feels more like the old BF games I used to play
if you shoot in bfv like you do in bf1 youre gonna have a bad time
There are literally recoil percentages on the battlefield tracker
well yea.. bf1 has old mechanics
BFV has that COD vibe i didnt like.
LOL
maybe im too old lol
he gets it
In BF1, bullets can go anywhere between a given spread radius, while BFV is based on recoil patterns that can be mostly learned
i dont think you two get it honestly
you just seem to default to "compare to cod for insult"
@queen canopy there is left right and up recoil percentages
no
thats the feeling i got
Ok gentlemen let's calm down
i didnt take it as an insult, that just seems like the vibe
@solid hinge Bullets still travel randomly, just tending to skew towards a certain direction. Theres no given pattern, just a general direction.
In BFV, a gun will reliably recoil in a very similar pattern every time, similar to CS:GO in a way
Its manageable, but its still RNG based
I mean nowadays it's playable
the mechanics are pretty modern, its just compared to old bf titles it feels weird
For example, the M1928A1 will reliably recoil up and then to the right (i believe) every time when aiming down sights. Meanwhile in BF1, the annihilator sort of just of spits rounds in a direction.
yeah
What a fun little debate
gunplay is stellar in BFV , dont get me wrong. I'm just not used to these new mechanics in a BF game
@queen canopy annihilator is great for hipfiring and close environments
So is the M1928A1
I was just using the two as a comparable example since they are effectively the same gun and behave in similar ways
I mean my point still stands of people were getting good with easier to use guns so trying to get good with guns that are somewhat on par isn't that easy now
Oh no
point and stand still is bad form for bfv though
? that just sounds like āitās harder to do well straight away in a game thatās been out for 2 years than it was at launch because people have experienceā
i might be misreading that idk
I mean you wanna talk about people using the same guns consistently, how about the people who have 100SS on the hellriegel and still use it religiously? Theres much of the same in BF1.
AutomƔtico
Recoil was always insane
Hm...its kinda like people religiously using the StG...a mediocre gun with a low skill floor being used consistently because of its ease of use. Where have I heard that before?
Also mag size
It wasn't mediocre when I was playing bf5
Like more broken than hellriegel
And that was a few months ago
Mediocre doesn't necessarily mean bad. It just means theres definitely better lol
stg was only broken near launch window
other than that its always been a slightly above average gun at most ranges
You're are debating that there were better guns than stg a few months ago?
Like what?
but definitely doesnt excel at anything
itās basically never been the best option for any specific scenario, it just happens to be a decent option for a range of scenarios
That's why its better than most
Lol
any user that picks a gun that is better at X scenario and plays X scenario is going to shit on the stg
StG is a jack of all trades, but master of none. Its beaten up close by most SMGs and Shotguns, beaten at range by MMG's, snipers, and SAR's, and even in midrange by some LMG's, MMG's, and even SMGs.
stg is for people that run around aimlessly but want a decent chance at killing at every engagement
Stg outgunned smg's
its beaten up close by close/med range smgs
any assault rifle can outgun the sten up close though
That's like super up close
if youre using an "ar style" smg the stg could be it up close
On maps that are very large
StG outgunned SMG's? I'm pretty sure an StG would get blown away up close by just about any SMG.
i can see a sten losing up close
stg has like 3-4 btk up close
but still fairly slow ROF
Suomi, Type 2A, Thompson, EMP, MP-40 even would all beat StG
4
yeah 4
youd have to pick a ranged specific SMG to lose
Hell, the grease gun might even beat it at mid range if the user is accurate
and considering ranged specific if obviously a niche role its gonna be weak at all ranges
and even then itās in a completely even situation which literally never happens 
bfv guns are way more nuanced and balanced than a lot of people think
stg will beat the sten if theyāre both in their 4BTK range assuming 100% accuracy and both players start shooting at the exact same moment, since the stg has about 120rpm more than the sten
What is the ttk for sten and ttk for sten at midrange?
which isnt surprising with all the people still claiming 2a is op
*close to mid range
theres another problem you brought up
guns are not only balanced compared to other gun but also considering the class they are on
if you gave the general kill potential of an stg to the medic class that would be oppressive as shit
infinite heals with good general kill potential, oof
Bullets To Kill
Ahh
so until around 25m the sten and stg are basically the same
which makes sense to me
though i think sten is easier to control
Sten is a midrange smg
Still an SMG
Yes but 25m
Midrange for a rifle and SMG are naturally going to be different
I have covid keep your distance...
yea sten has lower recoil all around
We're also assuming perfect accuracy in this case
That isn't a problem due to us using a application that doesn't require any physical interaction with eachother
put the vibration off, it transmit the virus tho
turn off 5G smh
so sten weaker, but easier to use and its on medic class
lmao
We're also assuming perfect accuracy in this case
100% accuracy, both parties start shooting at exactly the same time, both start at 100 health, no one gets cover, thereās no outside interference etc
are you sure? @echo turtle
Yes
You should be telling your family and friends rather than randoms on the internet
What about with perks?
stats are an ok thing for getting like a basic idea of stuff but if you base your analysis of anything purely on weapon stats then youāre a fool
Oh well youre doomed anyway
Because I totally wear headsets
you should be in the clear then champ!
Perks? Theres really no perks that affect damage and recoil, are there?
Ill Gove you credit. The game seems more balanced than it was the last time I played
*give
there are perks that affect damage and recoil
damage no (apart from ammo type specs), there are some that affect hrec or vrec
well.. damage indirectly from ROF increases
ah also true
Oh well yeah specializations are specializations, might as well be using a different weapon.
but that has the inverse affect of increasing recoil so itās harder to hit all of your shots sometimes
iirc its a corelated increase
I usually count them as separate weapons anyways
yeah itās not really like the actual recoil stat changes, just if youāre firing 100 rounds a minute more then youāre going to get the extra recoil stacking
per sym.gg i dont think the recoil actually changes
yea what dr said
like how damage doesnt increase, but damage over time does since you are shooting faster
i think theres something about multipliers but i forget
its been forever since ive look up how recoils actually works
Thats why I count them as different weapons, for fully specced weapons like the Thompson, you basically have the Drum Mag version, which has slower ROF but less ADS recoil and more ammo, and Stick Mag version, which has faster ROF but more ADS recoil and less ammo. They're basically different weapons entirely.
Ones good from the shoulder, the other from the hip
hipfire bleh
Wait no the damage drop off the sten is fucked
The damage at 50m is 12
I mean its an SMG
i thought you were saying it doesnt have dmg drop off
and every weapon does other than snipers iirc
most of the snipers have a little bit
technically snipers do but i dont think they change their btk other than anti material rifles over 100m
yeah min damage of any bolt action to the body is like 60+ damage
I swear the game has changed so much in the past 3 months it's crazy
Idk Lee-Enfield doesn't do a ton, does it? I think ive seen 50's from lee enfield
i believe the only gun in the game that doesnāt have any damage drop is the krag jorgensen? just a straight... 60(?) damage per shot
Well props for them caring ig
@solid hinge Last 3 months have been stagnant lmao, it was around the new year it was changing constantly
From 5.0 to 5.2 to 5.2.2 to 6.2
@queen canopy when was the last big update?
content update june right?
always was
@mighty fjord ... its always been good!
@dense bone Around then
ive been saying this monthly
Somehow I didnāt realize
you must not read my messages
By the way. My pc is up at the end of this month!
If I remember I gave up a little bit before June
I will get a stream set to build it. All the battlefield boys and girls will be watching
Played a bit after but not enough to spot the differences
Hmm
Ill consider redownloading
there were minimal balance changes in june as far as i remember
What system are you on
wasnāt anything significant
5.0 best patch 

i liked 6.2 a lot personally
i thought 5.2 changes were for the right direction, just imbalanced
5.0, 6.2 and 7.0 probably top 3 major updates lol
And also...a bit slow
i am
Im on Xbox
oh yea, idk how these balancing talks work for console because of aim assist and shit
when I played bf1 on pc and bf1 on ps4 it's completely different
I play mainly ps4
Are there changes in balancing for console?
statistically speaking the platforms are identical for bfv
BFv role play
other than aim assist on i dont think so
PS4
Hmm
granted, aim assist are basically soft hacks so thats pretty big
lemme get that !!lfg Nyphon
!!lfg @jolly wyvern
ā¹ Looking for Players to play with?
Head over to the Looking For Games channel category.
Please remember to state your region when looking for players to play with!
#lfg-pc #lfg-xbox #lfg-playstation

i think bf1 may have had slightly different stats for some guns between platforms
I mean it's different ballparks considering different consoles
but like recoil stats rather than damage or anything bc that wouldnāt make any sense
Unless you are someone who plays keyboard and mouse on ps4
main difference is going to be that some weapon types are a bit more popular on console/pc
I mean a controller works differently than keyboard and mouse
eg pc i think has a few more semi autos and stuff, console has somewhat more of a leaning towards automatics
due to control schemes
but thatās not really to do with balance so much as just itās a bit easier to use one style of gun on whichever control scheme
Xbox and PS4 are pretty much identical so comparisons there are fine
the statistics, as i said, are identical
you shoot a guy with whatever gun on pc and a console, itāll do X damage and kick Y degrees upwards on average
You have to take aim assist into account
soft hacks
Ok
aim assist sucks imo
(on average because recoil has a degree of random-ness, but the parameters are identical for each platform)
But you still do
i removed it
xbox and ps4 are functionally identical from a game/control sense
i would never turn off soft hacks on console
also... i am on ps4 lol
True
i donāt really need to take the differences into account because there arenāt any, weāre on the same system lol
..
yea that's all cool alright
but can you fight a tiger with a Sherman?
where are the people I've been arguing with for two days about this š¤£
kept the entire enemy Tank Division at bay with 1 TIGER
by which you mean you come into random conversations and say the exact same thing for a bit and annoy everyone involved? 
4 US tanks vs 1 TIGER
Wasn't there a Sherman that was made just to kill Tigers
history repeats itself
You do realize that that's a myth
Firefly right?
The modified guns on the tanks were not as close as the 88mm of shermans
*tigers
@brave coral sorry though
but that's not the point
Tigers aren't an unstoppable force
that video was supposed to be humorous
give that support player a medal
didnt watch it
You know, running away in sherman from a TIGER
It's also a video game
If Tigers were good Germany would've had the war somewhat in the bag
hmm do you need some history lesson boy
Tigers, both in the game and irl were good tanks for what they were designed to do.
But they suffered due to steel shortages and oil
tigers were launched a bit too late into the war if you didn't know
i mean they had a good cannon and strong armour, but they were unreliable, expensive to produce and relatively few were made
I used to spawn all time with TIGER But they are damn slow
not enough to make any sort of difference
that doesn't diminish the tank itself though
It's a heavy tank what do you expect
thats a logistical issue
definitely
To be a fucking buggati
if we look at actual combat performance, the tiger was very good, of course it had mechanical issues as well, all tanks did, and especially heavier tanks
I don't care if it's a bugatti or no
yeah it wasnt a bad tank, but honestly it gets weirdly hyped up by wehraboos
because.. its a tank
but it's annoying that I go from one flag to the next in HAMADA and the round is OVER
yeah it's a tank, not unbeatable
never spawn with heavy tank in HAMADA
Whatās wrong with that?
Hey dude I know we're running low on the resources required to make tanks and planes but what if we made a tank that costs more to produce than a much smaller and cheaper tank
ok thats just a little bit of an exaggeration i think unless you got out and pushed it
Well thatās a tiger
If Germany had the resources to spare the Tiger would be a more common source of fear
Itās pretty good
It is good
wth happened to battlefield man
@echo turtle ye but have you considered: internet people who idolise ww2 germany will love it 70 years later? who's the real winner here
where is the main menu
Nothing happened?
It's good but they couldn't produce enough of them to make up for their losses at that time
You need to look at what resources each countries had though. Germany couldn't afford to make as many tanks as soviet union or the allies, not material wise and especially not manpower wise. So they didn't try, they went for quality instead.
Because it was the only thing they could do
Soviet union could afford making thousands and thousands of t34's, so they did and it worked
It barely worked I'd say, a little more logistics support or they take stalingrad earlier it could've been different for the tank division of Germany .
they had their own issues
as you can see here , Me keeping all 4 US tanks at bay with 1 Tiger , why wouldn't you run away if you're in a sherman
It's also just a video game
germany is actually on the offense in the battle of Arras depicted in bfv
yeap
so apart from referring to germany as the fatherland (especially during that period of its history) being pretty sketch, the defense thing isnt even right lol
hahaha
I hate women in BFV so much

I mean
Every time I think about them my PP gets hard
that is also true to the point that I pushed E flag instead of Defending D
but I defened E Haha
Aren't Americans invading wake Island even though it was the other way around

yeah seems like it was an allied counterattack against the flank of the german invasion force in 1940
i reckon they didn't want to spend more time making japanese battleships and landing craft
yeah basically
they'd have to model some large assets for use on one map basically for a game that isnt a history documentary
that's why people here I kept asking said they can kill a tiger with a sherman, haha. I mean of course you can in the game .
it was also raided occasionally after it was lost to japan, as well as aerial bombardments with decent frequency
They could've just done an Airborne and had the Japanese roll in on American ships
since you're all into ww2 I recommend you watch Europa documentary , on Eastern front . I'd say it's not that much biased (russian) even though I'm not much of a historian.
it's on youtube
To be honest, I like what DICE did with tanks in this game, at least nowadays that they balanced them a bit
i much preferre how tanks work in this game over BF1/BF4/BF3
what has more players bf3 or bc2?
probably bf3
Yeah 3 is probably more populated
they are free on game pass so i didnt know which to play so i'll get bf3 then
oh, nice
i couldnt advice ppl to buy it atm but honestly if it's for free check it out
yeah if you have game pass ultimate now you get ea play too so all the battlefield games are free even bf5
I guess the european servers are still populated enough
eu lol na ftw
Sad it's dead in my region
I don't think a game like bf3 is coming back
since bf4 the infantry skillgap has been greatly reduced I think .
i never liked bf4
To give the players a feeling of accomplishment .
like getting score for hitting them before killing them.
that's honestly a good feature though, provides more feedback and somewhat of a tactical advantage bc you can tell if you hit a collateral body shot, explosves it gives you a sense of how many people there are etc
I guess
but when I get 180 damage from a plane and no kill that feeling oof
with the bomb landing on 5 guys haha
bf3 at 6gb out of 28 oof
You can wait another 5 minutes
you can do it fony
we believe in you
or should I issue the order 223
not one step back soldiers
5 minutes i wish lol it says 1hour 45 minutes on my screen
Make a super internet cable
Mean time you could watch my video and maybe you could learn a thing or two
Pepelaugh
Requires an ethernet cable and a lot of AAs
me learn a thing or two lol im max level on ps3
Kamikazes
post it in #streams-and-videos if you want to try and advertise it
it's about BFv tank haha not bf3
no advertising your content in main channels
bfv ew
does this count as advertise? i guess
Bf5 is a good game
only good battlefield games are 1943,bc1/2,bf3 and 4
if you're telling people to watch your own video then yeah pretty much
but they have a meaning , I mean they were meant to be humerous and involve people from the community .
that's why I'm pretty much doing some conversation about them ....
only good battlefield games are 1943,bc1/2,bf3 and 4
@whole gazelle No.
Scratch bc2
Add bf vietnam
youve posted it like three times in the past hour or two, without any relevance to the conversation other than you posting it and trying to spark a conversation about... how good you are i guess?
blackout must like the bad games saying that then
Sup
bc2 is bad?
As a bf game? Yes
Battlefield 3 graphics are so good bro
ah yes i forgot the opinion of one person is objective and must be taken as fact at face value
ok blackout is insane bc2 is the best bf game ever
Its more cod than bf
Yea because there's always different people active all time
guys is m416a3 decent gun?
saying that is like saying cargo pants arent pants
Reduced player counts
ok blackout we get it your fave is hardline and your a bc2 hater we get it
And no I don't need to be any Better if I can Defend a flag against 4 shermans and give my infantry to take all flags .

Right
that's all the purpose of any conquest
At least hardline had 64 players ;)
Everyone knows halo 2 is the best battlefield game
ok fony we get it you think you're superior to everyone else, especially if they don't instantly agree with you
idc how many players a video game has lol i play it for the game not the players
How about scale, one of the thinga bf is known for
64 or 5 im gonna like the game regardless if it plays well
hmm a team game with 5 players in a lobby sounds... interesting
i dont play story mode lol
a
a
I
story mode lol this anit skyrim
would never forgive battlefield for not having a competitive scene since bf3
skyrim ā¤ļø
I just hate it when people regard bc2 as a goos bf gam3 since it shows they either haven't played many bf games or just don't get what the franchise is about
Skyrim is in a different genre
Skyrim and bf has nothing in common
Bc2 is good on its own sure




@tired owl
