#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 2250 of 1
and then we'll be back to status quo of satisfaction for a bit, then something odd happens
and boom
pt.(how many times has this happened now)
Weapons were already balanced for their effective ranges
@stoic breach not actually
Its just that possibility was getting mixed up with efficiency
So why put myself through that frustration for potentially supporting a company that I kind of don't want to support anymore. I love Battlefield, but geez. Are they that out of touch with their playerbase?
depending on your skill, a semi auto could out skill a sniper
Weapons could kill at range, they werent good at it
That just meant bolt actions were too weak
hell, even an smg in the proper hands
Maybe management is forcing crap to happen?
nah, it just means you're bad with positioning
An SMG spraying at someone past 50m still requires 8 bullets to land
i can get into 40 metres from enemy and take off heads
I honestly think this could've been avoided with a cte
and productive feedback from that
Couple that with spray control and bullets missing
Landing 8 shots at range isnt actually worthwhile
I mean, you can still kill people from long range since recoil is 0 on some guns
well, i guess console gunplay and pc gunplay are diffrent
Especially since there are weapons that can kill faster in less time
Its not
Why does everyone think thats the case
because aim assist
There is no difference in TTK between console and PC
for whatever reason I've noticed that most people who like the ttk are pc
Aim assist doesnt help you with spray control
@modern sedge people on pc like the new ttk?
PC is much more precise with controls
i despise it
Some people here have defended it
Theres also no difference between the amount of bullets it takes to kill people on PC or console
and most of the people i play it with
There might be a recoil modifier on console.
it makes the hackers even more powerful by making it take longer to kill them unless in vehicle or recon
The difference between console and PC is that console gets a 25% reduction in vertical recoil, which doesnt really matter
But don't quote me on that.
Theres no mechanical difference between dragging your mouse down and dragging your stick down
So its a non-argument
the new type 100 which has virtually no recoil on pc vs console :V
that means the type 100 must be a laser gun on console
Yeah
it is
Theres basically no difference
gentlemen bf5 alicam reliable site does anyone know?
I honestly miss the game's gunplay in Chapter 4. Yeah, the game itself sucked then, but the guns felt awesome. At least in my opinion.
PC vs console is a non-argument because there are no mechanical differences when it comes to numbers
that makes practically other medic weapons useless
gentlemen bf5 receive reliable site does anyone know?
what
türk yokmu a.q
i think he's trying to buy bfv?
yes
Aim assist doesnt change the way you approach a gunfight, you still hold R2/Mouse 1 to kill someone
trusted site buy bf5
Or pull or click with a semi auto
buy off ea/origin
They actually felt like guns, not lasor tag weapons, or since this update, potato cannons.
trusted site buy BF5 ??
BUY OFF ORIGIN/EA
Yeah, Origin.
origin is very expensive
buy off G2A tbh
Hold on. Give me a sec.
he missed the sale didnt he?
guys should i get bfv
it was like 22 bucks AUD on monday/tuesday
at this time
G2A Trusted ??
@urban sleet with the current progression bug. wait till it's fixed
There is a great website that sells awesome games for like $5-$20.
aight then
G2A Buy bf5 Trusted ??
wait until after the holidays when all of this stuff is fixed and the controversy has blown over
I guess g2a works
@urban sleet for context, you can't get any new weapons until you level the class to the maximum 20
Is the G2A reliable?
it was fixed 6 months ago but the new patch brought it back
@solid hinge that's up to you to decide
buy bf5 G2A ?
well damn
i had a bad first experience with G2A with an invalid key for Nier Automata
so i don't buy from G2A anymore
@heavy meadow I don't know if it's reliable
Yeah, G2A is better for older games
Sins of a Solar Empire was like 40c on G2A
Very nice
I'll buy BF5 from G2A then
G2A is fine
wait for christmas sale if you want to buy official
how about the ttk shenanigans?
No
should i wait until it's fixed?
Its not worth it
Personally, I don't notice much of a difference
Its probably not going to get fixed for a long time
depending on the backlash, the ttk changes might be reverted
But there's a lot of other stuff wrong with the update, not just the TTK stuff
How many TL will be at Christmas BF5 @heavy meadow
yeah
idk, that's up to EA
EA is the publisher (talking about the sale price)
in the end, EA gets the final say for the patch
i really hope they revert the ttk
after all, they publish the game
Dice are pretty sensitive to this level to backlash, so I'm not surprised if they revert most of it
so i can play happily when i get the game
now G2A is reliable or not
this guy...
i dont even know why he's asking here
guessing the guy's turkish, cant he google?
go ahead

@solid hinge use this to buy bfv: https://www.google.com.tr/
My issue with this update is less about ttk and more about how the stability and optimization got fucked, which says more about dice
than the ttk
what ?
@modern sedge this is xbox right? what optimisation problems?
@solid hinge Here is another option. https://slickdeals.net/video-game-deals/
cc is not being granted on level up, I've crashed after load screen
also stuck in vehicles
that's not optimisation, that's just bugs
and cant actually spawn
optimisation is mainly performance based
Its great how DICE added bugs back into the game
my frames have microstutters though
That were fixed
that was curious
how did they fix the bugs originally if the patches bring back in the bugs
that doesn't make sense to me
Hm. So we're going backwards.
ID_SPARTA was a font issue was it not?
Fun.
I think it's a part of a lack of continuity from dev build to actual game
or it was a dirty fix
Cause if you're looking at the game from gameplay testing, I wouldnt be surprised if a few things weren't looked at that werent directly relevant
AKA, a bandaid rather than an actual fix
The whole CC thing was a pretty big wasted opportunity
just like how the backend is now hardcoded to unlock all the weapons for the class at 20 regardless
buy bf5 PlaySultan ?
pacific update was so good until this damn patch
Like, they could've made all the guns available to buy with CC, and then made all the specs free
everything was working fine but then they decided to do this
No stupid unlock grind
Why the heck would they take the chance on an already potentially very negative update? That's two levels of horrible oversight.
Cause unlock grind sucks
Iirc, at launch, it was like that
Exactly.
you just unlocked specs based on how you play
@stoic breach i dont mind unlocking guns because otherwise people would jump straight to the OP guns
Why take the chances again if the engine proved unreliable... for a year?
like the stg and shit
not just that, the beginner guns are pretty good
It was just popular because it was easy to use
@stoic breach meta might be a better word then
Yeah thats the bigger issue
._.
But now there are actually super clear weapons you should be using
Like Type 100 for medic is easy to use
the meta was less structured before ttk
Like sure, this gun was easier to use, but you can still kill people with it
And Jungle Carbine is the best weapon you can use as a medic
Well there was a fairly clear meta
Easy guns you can magdump with
oh yeah, rip 3 shot kills at range for heavy load garand
StG44 didnt require alot of effort to control
I'm not hesitating to charge people with a nambu or ruby now since pistols are pretty strong
now it's 4 shots minumum unless headshot
And the fairly large mag let you go ham without having to reload as much
Yeah, pistols have better DPS at range than some automatics
nambu is actually kinda fun to use
The M1912 pistol has a better ranged DPS than the FG42 and M1907
the model 27 could probably do some damage if you can aim it
cause even if it was ass and it still kinda is, you can outgun people
pistols are pretty reasonable i think
They're more than reasonable
you almost never use them unless you are unprepared
They have a faster TTK than alot of primary weapons
Revolver memes.
Not just revolver
If you think TTK is bad now, try firestorm. With plates and stuff like OMG

Big iron on his hip....
BF1 had better weapon balance than 5.2
@shell oak people still play firestorm? 
I know, but it's the first thing that comes to mind.
Wait, did the tank buffs get applied in firestorm too
And alot more interesting weapon balance than BFV
wait, did tanks get buffed in 5.2?
Only just jumped on to discord, what's the consensus on 5.2 here?
yes
Yeah
Yes
They're beefier now
My only complaint was the RBD.
They're better at camping now
On ps4 yeah
Lol
ahh fuck
consensus?
"RBD" only applied if you used the gun wrong
now i can't even deal with a camping tank anymore
General opinion
5.2 sucks, but we're not just repeating 'dice bad 5.2 bad' all day
If you magdump with a weapon that wasnt supposed to magdump you got more spread
i actually hate it when im offence in breakthrough and we get rekt by snipers and machine gunners whilst the tanks are at the back sniping kills
If you couldnt control your fingers and ADS while firing you got more spread
BF1 had a much more deliberate gunplay system
But it wasn't intuitive for most people
and then we get rekt because their tanks call in a hachi or a ka-mi
hachi
whichever one gets called in
Hm, maybe I need to read into it more.
i cant remember
hachi is the most powerful being right now in the game lol
BFV being easier and more intuitive is nice
Will hardcore have reinforcement calls
I haven't tried BF1 since it's TTK changes I think.
But then you get complaints like "SMG sniping" and "Lewis gun magdump"
Yeah
TTK2.0 made BF1 alot better
It was shit
Increase blast radius to 500m.
had even longer ttk?
Hardcore rockets wont be anything different
Yes.
shit
You're choosing to wipe the point if teamkilling is enabled
BF1 TTK 2.0 actually made weapons stronger than BFV
But because nobody knew how to control spread, TTK seemed longer
@stoic breach i prefer that i can shoot back at a lewis gun hacker with an opportunity to kill rather than only damaging as a assault with an m1
I wished bfv would have better guns
We still dont have the damn springfield
Yeah
hackers on pc are a massive bane to the game
least there weren't many on AU severs
but now that im in asia, it's there almost every game
But yeah, BF1's gunplay system was actually really good, but it needed to be as simple and easy to read as BFV
like we got 2 hackers on both sides
@heavy meadow Yeah, but with a good anti-hack we wouldn't need to say that.
But I think BFV should've used spread instead of spread to recoil
and those 4 have like 110-4 a piece
Because BFV weapons give the impression that they're better at range than they actually are
I just know from general knowledge to avoid asia pc servers at all costs nowadays
but it's either play at 300 ping or play japanese ones
and there's a guy doing 70-4 in a vehicle
Like, BF1 SMGs vs BFV SMGs
easily 16000+ score
Theres no difference between missing 4 shots and landing 4 shots at range with an SMG in BF1 vs landing 8 shots with an SMG in BFV
and people say vehicles are overpowered
Its just that more shots landed in BFV so SMGs seem more accurate
And lethal at range
@idle breach they're too beefy, even before the 5.2 tank buff
@heavy meadow I know, but I think DICE need to actually fix these problems instead of bandaiding them.
as a part time infantry part time tanker part time plane
if i can't take out a tank in the open by myself with panzerfaust + sticky dynamite
there's a problem
if you wanna do something like 60-0 on a plane like reddit always says
you gotta be damn good
Actually my analogy is wrong, nvm
like vehicle hit 80 with 2 dynamite + panzerfaust
Theres not much difference between spread stopping you from landing shots at range, vs landing 8 shots and killing someone slowly at range
that's not okay
They're both about as equally effective
yeah but doing 60-0 thing iss
Guess I'll try BF1 TTK 2.0 and see how that goes.
BFV just let weapons be mediocre at range instead of forcing you to completely miss targets you weren't supposed to hit
like people dont play dark souls because it's easy. they play it because it's hard and punishing. that's what i liked about pre-5.2 bfv
if im out of position, i will be punished
So people complain about BFV weapons being too good at range when they really werent
Like, SMG's maximum BTK is 8, vs SARs 3-4
you gotta beat the other pilots do good score
if a guy sees my rifle glint and shoots me before i move, i applaud his accuracy and accept my death
SARs are obviously better at range, but because SMGs could kill at range, it seemed worse
yeah never
unless you dont have hard cover
trust me, all these snipers are prone and wondering why they're getting rekt by 2 shots to the head by a garand
it's because you can't move fast while prone
people are much easier to shoot when they're still or moving slightly
When bolt actions just need to be buffed
Unless I'm in a position where no one sees me, I usually strafe
(I know that's pretty scummy)

what. how is it scummy?
they're covering their body with their heads
How is strafe scummy
Should DICE stop you from pressing A/D while aiming
That just makes the game sluggish
idk I just feel it kinda is wrong vs other users
Strafe isnt scummy
it's like saying doing a flank with a mmg is a scummy move
it isnt
that's just game sense
nerf the lightened stock spec
yeah. 80% seems a bit too much
Lightened stock doesnt really need to be nerfed
If you can reduce the effectiveness of an enemy ranged weapon, thats more power to you
im on pc and i see a/d spammers everywhere
it's pretty easy to strafe
A/D isnt really super bad, its pretty much in-check
and im perfectly fine with it
A/D spam is just intuitive for the player
feels like counter strike where you had no choice but to a/d spam
Yeah its true that strafers dont really exist on console, but I know what strafing is like
otherwise you're just plain horrible at the game
I love running into sniper nests with a knife
And certain weapons being able to strafe faster is good
Just get to backstab while they're hardscoping
Like take MMGs being able to ADS, theoretically
And they dont hear a thing
@modern sedge hard scoping snipers who are foward prone deserved to be punished really
that's what you mostly find on xbox
Eh, thats just player choice
tasty
Its better for players to feel like they have options though
give em a nice club to the face
Compelling players to bipod just isnt great
I prefer crouching on a rock if I have to use bipod
Yeah
At least gives me something to use
It's better than no cover in most cases
or it's just really janky on pc
and prone
Yeah, with weapons that require a bipod, its annoying
Like Boys AT
Requiring the bipod to use a primary weapon sucks
Same with MMGs
like i try to use an mmg for support and im just hating it
Its terrible design, its super restrictive
dont like the entire mechanic of having to use the bipod to ads
MMGs shouldnt need the bipod, and AT Rifles should be gadgets
Having to bipod a gadget isnt so bad
@stoic breach how much damage do the AT rifles do to tanks?
Compared to a primary which you'll use 90% of the time
Depending on distance
You can do upwards of 90 engine damage
say 50 metres
50m like 12
aka what's the btk?
cuz i think it was a hard 40 damage back in bf1
I’ve never seen any AT rifle do 90 damage in a shot
hell no
Or rocket gun or what?
the rocket gun
Oh yeah
the one you had to use the bipod for iirc
Thats not a rifle really
Yeah
You could do some nasty crit damage to tanks if you aimed for the right spot
Yeah its fucking annoying
To use the best bolt action you need to ADS
Its like DICE are constantly scared of making competitive weapons
Everything needs to suck equally in BFV
I mean it’s not meant to go against infantry
well, i think the at rifles would become sniper meta if they could one shot kill at all distances
They can OHK up to 100m
Yeah prime requirement is needed
So it's KPM is pretty low
So is every other bolt action
OHK weapons can be balanced by their usability
like the bipod
OHK isnt overpowered unless its too efficient
AT rifles have the versatility of doing damage to vehicles too though
are invisible flares a problem to anyone else on the pacific?
if i was given OHK up to 100m, my KDA would be much higher
Well you can try using the Boys AT or PzB then
I think Pzb39 can OHK up to 200m actually
nah, i just hate the bipod thing entirely
18rpm OHK is shit
Once again they’re tank rifles
with just one or two shots, i would understand
Eh
Also if it was a gadget, it can have higher base spread so it cant reliable snipe people
But it can always hit a tank
Because tanks are larger
But they aren’t even crazy effective against tanks
They could be buffed as gadgets
and make them so that the ammo can only be gotten from the base ammo stations
then, i can understand that
AT rifles would be a fine addition to my assault class
Besides, with APCR Boys AT, standing behind a tanks engine, you can deal upwards of 90 damage
Recon would benefit more from a precision-based AT gadget
hello hutto!
Assault aggressive launcher AT, Recon methodical precision AT
Sounds more appropriate imo
@stoic breach assuming you can even get behind a camping tank
i really wish the pacific planes could do more damage to the tanks
Couple that with possibility of having to trade a spawn beacon for an AT Rifle
There's utility balance as well
because the ones i see now are literally just bombing the flags for free infantry kills
The 2 500’s can one hit a tank
Because you wouldnt have a saltmining primary weapon that cant have its AT power buffed
And if it was a gadget, you wouldnt really be able to use it on maps without vehicles, it wouldnt be helpful
You'd have to trade a spawn beacon or decoy
AT Rifles could potentially deal somewhere around 20 or 30 AT damage at range as gadgets
That’s too op
Boys AT as high damage low velocity, with faster damage dropoff
More damage than a panzerfaust
Pzb39 as high velocity, medium crit damage
And easier to land hits with
Panzerfaust sucks in general
But still, a rifle should out perform a 3 round carrying AT rocket launcher
Well right now, with APCR, Boys AT from experience does minimum 12 damage to medium tanks
Which isnt actually alot
That’s pretty good
Its ok, but not amazing
What makes rifles amazing compared to other AT gadgets is the range
Multiple AT rifles would have to be used to be more effective
But people wont actually coordinate multple AT rifles
Yeah
With dedication and cover at long range, you’re pretty fine going against a tank
Which is why it would be a good precision AT tool against tanks
I just don’t see a need for a damage buff though
Because imagine being in a tank then 30% of your health gets deleted from across the map
But like, high damage would also be fine, the bullet ricochet still applies, so you could even be required to set up on the right angle
And you can’t hit them back
The AT rifles have a higher rof than the launchers anyways
The rifles are supposed to do less damage
20 would probably be a reasonable number for damage
They’re not supposed to delete tanks quickly, they’re supposed to wither them away slowly or act as support
They arent really good at either though
Or pick them off at low health
Watch Azura’s video on AT rifles
He does a fine job at taking out tanks solo
Yeah I think I've seen it
I've soloed tanks as well with Boys AT
The damage can also just be based on crit as well
So AT rifles have anti tank capability and infantry ohk ability to the body
With only the con of a slow rof
I think it’s Ight
And bipod
True
Which makes it an unruly primary weapon that people feel compelled to camp with
All snipers do so anyways
I don’t think it makes things any different tbh
Higher base spread so that they cant snipe infantry past 10m
Well people arent going to try and camp with a gadget that isnt good at sniping people
Thats just pointless
And because of the whole gadget resupply thing, they wouldnt be able to resupply from an ammo pouch
Limiting the speed at which it can be used
And if you can only carry maximum one or two magazines, it would be fine as a gadget
Yeah
Also having to trade an AT gadget with a spawn beacon is a worthwhile trade
Cant use it against infantry, so theres no fragging utility
And a spawn beacon can be used by teammates at any time, whereas AT Rifles can only be useful if theres vehicles around
But then being able to carry an AT Rifle gadget means you can always be prepared for when a vehicle approaches, and you can be competent without an assault nearby if you want to lone wolf
oh man
Yes
Haha
buuuuut I think I still miss the original lethality of BFV
this just doesnt feel... that good
Tanks are real fun tho now
The visceral feeling of continually hitting your target and not confirming a kill
although I don't think I like the new damage system
More effort for the same reward
the added health to tanks feels great
Will never feel good
I feel like much more a threat
favorite tank is still the Staghound, followed by the Crocodile 
can i just point out how bs some of the shotguns are, i was in duel with someone and i had the lewis gun, he was at least 10 meters away from me yet still killed me within 1,5 seconds with a shotgun, like ?????
Slugs maybe
automatic
cause the drilling and the 1897 still fuck at 10 M
You can just be far enough away from people most of the time and they cant do shit
fair, but i expect at least to win a trade from that distance
Yeah not with the new TTK
slugs are like "like rolling dice? wanna roll some more
"
Using a medic bolt carbine you can probably beat an LMG if you're far enough away
true, LMG have been weaker lately anyways, except for flanks or something
sure
Yes
oh boy
Intriguing
So DICE's point is that they don't like how fast the game moves. Their metrics show that players dont stick the way they want, and people die to fast, ya blah blah blah, ok
Yes
DICE REVERT OR YOU GET IT
One of the benefits of old TTK was that every weapon felt the same danger wise, and it was all about how well you did
That meant that BFV had its own unique META
this new TTK is bad
Yes
DICE, I think one of the best reasons you should stick with the Old TTK is because the META ends up being created by the player base, which is a lot more interesting than when a company tries forcing it
Lmao
Yea

heres an odd example- Super Smash Bros Melee BEAR WITH ME ON THIS ONE
Slow down the game by making slow firing weapons better than fast firing weapons
It checks out
+99 damage lol
Ye....
I’ll go back to bf1 till they revert
Or 115..... and they dont die
ugh right
Super Smash Bros Melee is a chaotic mess of speed, so Nintendo tried making the meta more "clean" with Super Smash Bros 4
anybody realised the amount of ammo you spawn with has been increased?
However, I think time has told that Melee was way more interesting to play and watch than Wii U
That probably makes sense
So DICE, there is something good about letting a playerbase craft its own Meta
Yes
Yeah its nice
Because it takes more bullets
Thats an interesting theory
I just have one question
To kill a person
sup gang
why the fuck the kar98 always reload bullet by bullet
?
Because its a bolt
and once in a lifetime you load a whole clip
oh
Full clip is a whole clip
mood
had to mention it
When you run out
Is there sometihng I don't know about the Kar98k?
I think
And when you reload while you have ammo
its one bullet at a time
Yea apparently the reload animation is ducked
You just put some back in
how is it ducked mate?
you see when you run out of ammo
so you're talking about how you sometimes load bullets in manually?
@sonic rampart if you don't like how it works, play with the gewehr which reloads an entire clip regardless of how much ammo you have
you start loading bullet by bullet until you reach 5
I just remembered a factoid about why BFV's recoil system isnt that great
sometimes it loads a whole clip of 5 bullets
that was added in BF1- basically your reload with rifles is actually faster if you empty the clip
@heavy meadow I didnt say I didnt like it?
Cause its visual recoil and not spread, you can completely negate horizontal recoil by having a high FOV
its because of old weapons
Playing on a widescreen monitor gives you practically no horizontal recoil
bruh
hı
@sonic rampart wrong ping, sorry
hi
@north ravine that answer your question? sorry if I'm assuming wrong 😅
yea but its random
@north ravine okay the gewehr m95 if you want a full clip reload regardless
freeze you saying like all 5 bullets at once?
BFV needs spread back and not spread-to-recoil
OH ok sorry then
yes @plain temple
@north ravine it's not random. if you expend all 5 bullets, you will reload the full 5 bullets in a single clip
no
isnt the scope above the reload thing or am i blind?
other than that you'll, reload one by one
Imagine using bolts tbh
is it like ironsight only?
OH
who will come bf 5
I GET IT
that makes sense
spam comments to fix ttk
no
no
just like, leave one comment and have that be it
fml
let dice figure it out
You must be 19 or older to view this video. Please confirm your age. (A Korean cell phone number will be required.)
🦮
I dont think this update is that bad
same
Just need a lot of tweaking
imo its ok
Ye my Tommy and suomi feel like nerf guns now
@plain temple hopefully they fix it after the christmas noobs go away
So I use others
Thompson and Suomi are equally as bad right now
no fuckin way thats true
^
Theres practically no difference right now
DICE pls delete the new spotting system!!!!!!!
i liked it when my heavy load m1 garand could 3 shot at any range
They both have 5-13BTK
use type 100 for maximum toxicity
I use the mp28
its a laser beam
Cause I want to get it to gold tbh
MP28 also became gigashit
i can have the absolute advantage on a thompson and get my world ROCKED because the tommy whips around and shits on me
has no recoil
no recoil
True
@stoic breach I still have to get the gun to gold 
cappucino
trombone
Bolt carbines are some of the best weapons in the game right now
this ^
jungle carbine is good
With Jungle Carbine being the best current weapon
even the commando looking good
Never used the carbine
main selling point of the jungle is that its a really fast gun
I dont like the fact that the medics get a sniper
i never got to use the jungle carbine as of yet because the type 100
but id rather have a grenade launcher with me
just seems better
I dont want bf1 medic snipers back
Yeah medics shouldnt have bolt carbines really
Thats like
Recon should have them probably
Mondragon is best bf1 medic weapon
Yea
nerfing to 2 shot headshot would be preferential for medic bolt carbines
Ez fix for weapon balance
at longer ranges
Recon gets bolt carbines as "skill snipers" for headshot players
maybe from 40+
upclose its a one hit
Bolt actions get sweetspots again
I used that fast firing pistol in bf1
If you dont want to use sweetspot, just use bolt carbine
frommer
I think its called the frommer stop
frommer very good imo
Ye

the feeling when you never played bf1
Is BfV your first bf title?
and the peacekeeper
Peacekeeper Nice
Why should assault get weapons that are easier at range than recon
And there was another revolver I liked
Just make recon bolts easy too
i only got to play bf1 using a friends computer because it was a rather busy time during my short life
Very cool
i think aim is a thing you get pretty quick once you get punished a lot
@sonic rampart yes
just like how dark souls puts you through a tutorial boss that's harder than half the game to get you ready
i do have bf1 but
Oh
never touched it
Why lmao
i'd play
I played bf1 alone lmao
its very active @stoic breach

Not in australia
Theres one server in australia
sad
you right
@stoic breach has scomo fixed the nbn yet?
conquest and operations are pretty lit in europe
Scomo has gone scomode and kill 3 people instead of fixing the internet
oh yeah thats right. saw australia practically being on fire
Ye
A pétition for EA remove the 5.2 TTk and spoting
how about a petition for you to git gud
I try to make the max for BFV i love and ni this 5.2BF
Has anyone else not been able to see server names or platoon tags?
why is m1 so bad now
Guys do i need to buy the year 2 edition in order to play the Pacific?
No
they butchered m1a1 😩
ALSO WHY IT STILL SAYS COULD NOT FETCH YOUR REPORT i played like 16games and still says that same shit
but nobody used it so nobody talks bout it
So what's the difference between year 1 and 2
restart game or try changing ip with a vpn @lilac umbra
They butchered the fg 42
i have a major feeling that all DICE is going to do is slightly buff the FG42 and the Tommy gun back up
i had same issue yesterday and even if i restart my ps4 nothing happens
Year 2 you get all tow weapons and accessories from before the pacific
i didnt see that many ppl use fg42 before though anyways. ppl always resort to the easy to use guns and fg was not easy with 20 bullets
come on whay is this shit
why wud they buff the tommy gun if they do that then they need to buff the suomi and zk too
since those are the most egregious nerfs
I'd disagree. Now that I'm using it more extensively, its just so weak to use for anything except explicitly flanking an indoor position
i use the 50 bullet clip
Same
so what i can do to fix this
yeah real funny
@heavy meadow not rural
Im metro
Dice, I dont like the new armory- bring back the old one
you havent? wait you hvaent played yet?
I have played the new update
oooh i just opened the game and its got the new 1942 theme 
I just didnt care enough about the armoury to open it
truth be told
this new theme is cool, but only for the first part with the drums
the opening drums remind me of the halo theme 
Haha nice

ok but like
Razor
this new armory
what is this negative space bullshit
where are my big 16 buttons!
Interesting
what is this nonsense, now you just click what nation you want like a PEASANT!
also help me out with this one- I bought Kiesuke, right?
big japanese general guy
I wanna use nothing but the sword, right?
well, the swords fuggin impossible to use unless you're a medic, so I can only equip him on the medic class
but like
I usually have my medics as women, right?
this presents a big ole problem, cause who else do I put my female character on!
any other fucking role ?
ok but like, Assault just doesnt feel right, and neither does Engineer
but putting them on the Sniper class feels so basic, right?
THIS IS SERIOUS
wasn't BFV supposed to have dogs?
so i just decided to put them on Assault
bro thats just dumb
the set backs of war ¯_(ツ)_/¯
what will gender has to do with classses
ah dunno
still a just game😂
so equip one with the Tommy and say she picked it off a dead patient 
wait not the garand-
the Tommy
okay im done
i see. didnt the repair tool used to jam tanks in previous BF's?
so what class would be recommended for someone new to BFV
religion sun @little raptor
ITs a great way to get points without having to kill people
thats not something you get by plugging it into google translate lol
unless you did
yes
Hello
I know a bit of arabic 😉
tightness, its a hard language init
yep it is
If only i could send pic
Server browser lists servers but instead showing the name, it shows up as number. Anyone know how to fix it?
but @velvet lotus more than just being free points, you also help out your teammates a lot by smoke enemy poistions
protip from me- if you hold the revive button while running to someone whos down, you'll automatically start reviving the moment you're in distance
aa okay well the problem i have with medic is the moment i revive someone i get shot by some random dude Appearing out of nowhere
aha lol
youll very quickly get used to where people are
BFV can be a bit hectic at times, but heres a cool tip from me
equip smoke grenades on medic and smoke whoevers down
that way you can revive them without being shot
Neat
👍
gonna try that
be sure to take a split second to check if the bodies got someone near them
hehe, im watching Battlefield Friends videos
hehe, the noob is stupid and its funny
I can't get myself to learn Arabic ngl
It's hard as shit
I love language learning but Arabic is hard shit
stupid patch, games are more unbalanced than previously, noob tankers became masters..
I like the update.
Honestly it makes the game harder which I like.
Gives it a good learning curve and I like changing my strategies to better gameplay
The TTK change doesn’t affect me and even if it did I would use different guns
That's good
SMGs feel deadly up close.
@untold wraith i dont have to change stategy, everything is ok, but is see what is happend on battlefield
Ok.
One thing I dislike about the update is the “ID not found” after playing a round so you don’t actually get any progress
also is it normal for guns to be even less deadly then a potato cannon ?
Cause it feels like it
@untold wraith even reports on battetracker are broken
Yeah that's the biggest bullshit of the update
Ngl people should focus more on that fucking horseshit than ttk
I want to progress in my TOW but can’t because of the ID not found.
That’s the only criticism I have and I hope the bug can be fixed
Still don't have that new revolver

What I do like about the update is that Garand has bayonet
Also BF1 killsound
I’m trying to get the Japanese side arm but I can’t get the XP
Some of the ttk changes don't affect me all that much but I understand why people are mad.
The new killsound is very nice
A surprise to be sure, but a welcome one
Sadly it's one of the only good things the patch addes
Yeah
I mainly use the Semi auto rifles so the TTK is fine on those weapons mid to long range.
It’s understandable that I would be killed by an SMG at short range.
Hey, is this game actually good now?
in some ways
I came here to ask the pro gamers themselves
Ha
i want to play it badly, prob cuz i dont have a pc at the moment
I’m a bootlicker so I would argue the games always been good



