#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 1861 of 1
my LAV loadout depends on maps
and i swap out Zunis for PRMs on the MAA if there are planes
don't need PRMs against helis
e
did they nerd the m30s range?
Yeah im playing right now raz
Raze
Im planning on getting off soon though.
I got jobs and cooking to do.
Dang
Thinking of making cinnamon rolls...
Honestly tho
What the fuck
It's like they've never developed a game before and are just chucking shit at the wall to see what sticks
"Fortnite style customisation! Uh wait actually just WW2 uniforms if they were designed by people that think The Joker is a role model..."
"Fuck the low TTK we going back to BF1 speeds! Wait, we should have consulted the players first... Er... Some people can have the high TTK some can have the low! Oh shit we don't have a strong playerbase, have your old TTK back."
"We know our main appeal is huge scale open combat, but we thought we'd put a Battle Royale in and even though we're super hyped, it won't be ready at launch. But for those who like open maps, here's literally a giant field with tanks on either end! Also most our new maps are small scale for our exciting 5v5!!"
They're not going to foster a competitive scene in a bug riddled game nearly a fucking year after it released
I can't wait for the Eastern Front to be represented as a 6v6 hero shooter
like i said theres like 2 people working on bfv
idk but theres definitely 2 people working on bfv and rest of the team focusing on bf6
thats why they're making small maps 2 people can make small maps but 64 people can make big maps
BF6 will be even worse
Dice clearly don't have a clue what they want their product to be
yeah i dont really understand the lets release a 64 player game but since all the other shooters have lesser players versing each other so they want to apply to those people that do and dont play this game for that element.
like that 4 v 4 mode or 5 v 5 mode in bf1
i never even played it
BF1 was the same game from the first trailer to the last content pack, there was a cohesive design philosophy that ran throughout the game.
The only time they diverged from that was that weird 5v5 incursions mode and they scrapped it because they realised it wouldn't benefit the game
General feedback says that the community wants a modern bf next
Which I agree with tbh
yeah
Wasn’t good tho
but it had ligma
Meanwhile BF V has tried to be about five games at this point
i mean thats why its probably called battlefield V duhhh
I like it when I ask for a specific build, and center it around the AT rifle...
And those special people, who know the "meta" and who come in, twinkle toed and great big smiles on their faces go "Ooh! But that gun isn't in the meta! For whatever reason would you want a build for that? I advise you use the gewer!"
If I wanted a build for that gun...
I WOULDA ASKED
Ikr
i like firestorm but it just needs more detailers areas and guns, tanks and uhhh maybe a...
uh
you know like playerbase
I guess people were more supportive of it in BF 1 because the game was in a very good state with a huge variety of maps and content, so chucking in a dumb 5v5 mode toward the end of the games' cycle was just whatever
Can’t have a player base without servers lmao
Fucken who even plays firestorm?
I would if they had any oce servers
Whereas BF V has fuck all content and two whole maps have been given to a mode nobody cares about
oh yeah so what pissed me off about bf1
But every time I queue for it I get like 13 minute waits and an eu server
was the dlc releases
took them like a month to release the 2 other maps for example when they had teh Australian dlc they relelased 2 maps month and the rest the next month thats when we started seeing dice gimping
Eww to both
are those bfv maps?
BF 1 maps have a very strong sense of place to them I feel
Eh, I bought premium
premium was sad you didn't even get the maps on time.
Amiens is actually real balanced
I hate DLC and mtx and all that shit but the expansion content system worked much better than what we got now
i just cant understand how they have like amiens 24/7
Sounds like your team sucks then 
Writing notes down for my conspiracy theory rn
Waaait, you're saying the E-F side is worse off?! 
It's probably like 10% better off
@steady nymph DICE/EA purposelly made ToW "shit" to make people nostalgic for the premium pass
As in "were making maps themed around x nation or event, let's put together a cohesive set of maps and scenarios and weapons"
Honestly I never had an issue with premium
Or any season pass, so long as you buy it once and you're good
Destiny 2 pisses me off that you can't buy it once
I have pretty good evidence that my theory is right
✍
Yay
But achi baba is my fav map of all bf tbh
That or one of the dragon ones in bf4
$20 is $20
i mean srsly guys
this game should just free to play
so no one has to be disappointed anymore
or they could just make a good game
this game has lack of content. No the community can be like hey man its a free to play game
Then they'll make the boins micros more prevalent
thats fine
Get ready to see rare outfits become boins only lol
wasn't there a f2p battlefield? or was that some weird dream I had?
Battlefield Play4Free
holy shit this was a thing
Bf5 bad bf1 good what you mean
that link is jack flags playing bf heroes in 2019
👀
?

uh oh
I'm considering changing my nickname again

Anyone wanna play Insurgency Sand Storm?
Is there any difference between the standard and deluxe edition of bf1?
5v5 maps lol lol ol lolol
Like do you miss out on dlc maps or something
@solid hinge deluxe edition is a scam
u mean getting red and white stripes on ur starting gun is not a scam? 
you miss out on good maps
Alright thanks I’ll wait for the premium version to go on sale
And good weapons
I need something else from bf5
A fast paced fps game which isn’t battlefield 5
see? bfv disappoints almost everyone
If you're looking for a ww2 game, i suggest hell let loose or post scriptum.
Call of duty games on pc tend to do poor due to a lack of support and hacker infestations. I don’t trust them too, as they promised micro transactions later on after launch
I like fps games with different play styles and weapons to unlock/master
Rainbow 6 is extremely slow
I have the game
I just like playing fast paced shooters during breaks and some free time when I want to relieve stress
Played 2016 on ultra violence
New one comes out in October right?
Well battlefield 5 only has like 9 months of juice left before battlefield 2020 is announced
Isn’t it hardline 2?
Wait battlefield Vietnam
Imagine the camping
Play Ion Fury
It's sick
o
Wolfenstein: The New Order and The Old Blood are a fun romp
Ye, new order and old blood are freaking amazeballs games
Also I weirdly rly enjoy the Single Player campaign for CoD: Advanced Warfare, even with the meme'd F To Pay Respects shit
New order immediately starts you off with what the game will be like
Ye
Yeehaw kevin spacey
I guess (or at least hope) it wasn't deliberate on their part???
It wasn't publicized till almost last year
Lmao watch supersize me and jared from subway is there talking to highschoolers
Kevin Spacey is a great actor, no matter what kind of scum he is
So that's what I view it as
I mean you're always gonna have this issue with casting
A big name doing something bad and then retroactively ruining your product
Uninstall the game because DED GAME
It would get people interested in the game again
Especially when bf6 pulls the same floppery in the future
I still wouldn't play BFV if it was all content and bots
I don't play battlefield for bots, I play to flex 
tbh, from decades of playing battlefiled, I wouldn't expect the next one until 2021
They have an actual AI that plays the maps for them to test and stress test
yeah exactly
Depends
AI is quite interesting mostly when they can learn how to play tye game by themselfs
Which is the case
Hello, fellow battlefielders
BF been having 2 years of dev time each IIRC fromstart to release
It's morning where i come from
Then the game gets 2 years of live service
What did I miss
if you want a finished game .. im not a huge fan of BFBC2 but the one thing they got right was they took their own time to get it right .. 2006 BF2142 ..2009 BFBC2
that should be the benchmark for the franchise
I'd prefer a finished game overall, I can fill time
And if they hit on a winner then go ahead and release the next game built onto the last
I mean independent the time they have of development I think its more about the decisions and getting the things done with the time projected by the teams
If they find a game that is great fun don't chuck it out after the 2-3 years for a crap one
Its like star wars battlefront 2
well yeah .. BF Vietnam (2004) was almost the same game as BF1942, just with a UI change and a few code tweaks (not counting the maps, soldiers and weapons)
Smooth solid game, almost bugless
No new primaries tgo
Only thing that ruined was their loot crates and card system
Since launch
They fixed it and now the game is actually interesting
Did DIce make in BF4 or BF3 small maps only for smaller modes??
Honestly I feel BFV has too many new primaries
They did for BF3 a dlc only with small maps
sure, BF3 & 4 had many small map and game modes
For domination and tdm
Dude that's some dangerous talk you talk, Derrik
Ok, thx for info
You'd get burned alive by bfv reddit for thay
even regular conquest .. hang on, let me take a screenie of procon
That*
Bf4 think small maps was just small areas from already big maps out of conquest
We are civilized in here @zenith pendant
Of course, wdym
BF3 had the Close Quarters DLC, which is a DLC i think should've been ported to BF4.
instead of having the fucking Naval Strike DLC.
Fuck the navy, dude.
I was not the one that trolled you yesterday
So idk why you ask me that question
But okay
i fucking hated it.
Carrier mode could have been better tbh
Gotta love how you play games then everyone in your fucking team leaves cause they dont like close games.
All of the maps suck for conquest and i don't care about the fucking carrier mode, i just don't.
@solid hinge If only they did a titan mode again like in BF2142

I did love tdm/domination on the naval strike maps. They were inside of the carrier only
People seem to love the idea of Titan mode
Time to write my second conspiracy theory
Didn't play back then myself
Titan mode was great
scrren snip from the server admin program of BF4 (my clan's server) available maps for one of the DLCs
They tried to replicate in BF4 but they didnt the way it was alike the original one
Basically titan mode was
Capture areas like conquest style then missile would launch and hit the titan in the air
U had to down the shields then next fase was the assault on the titan
@solid hinge i don't know what i'm meant to get from this
titan mode was like conquest large with tanks + inf only rush
Where u had to land or using the pods from the ground vehicles
Enter the carrier and destroy the core of it to win
The transport vehicle with the pods was fun
@rich ember that was a response to @tacit kelp question aboout BF4, does though not read?
Park it under then launch urself into the air to the carrier
Not to talk about the mechs
Shit was scary as infantry
oh
Anyways, tell me
was further up than i expected
@solid hinge Getting stepped on by enemy mechs all the time trying to run away from them 
So naturally people would assume that they don't support big modes, right?
Right?
People are mad about the 5v5 because they feel like they're being disregarded to cater to people who don't play the game anymore.
Because 5v5 was a waste of time in BF1
lmao I loved the mechs
I played the incursions
They're putting effort into something that people have already given up for dead
Do u know how fast it died?
Because devs were pushing their shitty ideas into a comp 5v5 that made 0 sense
Yes, but does not answer my question
The classes were horrible in incursions
Because it's wasted dev time @zenith pendant
Like Br, base game now 5v5
I was gonna get incursions for the arebo club but it wouldn't work upon launch so
If people knew that 5v5 maps were coming all along why didn't they cause an outrage back then
Why wait for gamescom and then be mad
And tbh jf u want a strong 5v5 game mode u got look at leading games like R6S or csgo
Which they focus on the whole thing
they both should have been farmed out like Apex was to free to play
And DICE has to focus on the casua base game, tue BR and now the 5v5
I think DICE are trying to cater to people who have stopped playing Battlefield already.
I do enjoy good competitive 5v5 if its done right
They had their chance, but they ignored them. Now they're gone, and DICE wants them back.
BFV to begin with wasnt meant to cater to the casual playerbase
They even hung around for BF1 because whilst it wasn't comp it was fun but BFV is dull as
Not throwing random elements and then a class system that makes no sense along with game mods that doesn't work with a competitve 5v5
My friends and I find bfv to be fun
And I am not coming back to 3d spotting, no thank you
Idk but playing incursions in bf1 felt like was playing a cod gamemode but there's a tank on each team
I've come around to 3d spotting being a necessary evil
@zenith pendant I hope you play a better game at some point in your life.
From horrible netcode to insane bugs that made no sense and broken weapons and ended up one of the most popular BF games
Tracking people on bf1 was laughably easy.
And everyone pronning everywhere
Are we talking about mmgs now
There was plenty of ways to get around 3d spotting in bf1 anyway
Exactly

Maybe only mmg fire gets them spotted on the minimap
A good counter to prone snipers and machine gunners was 3d spotting
Like what
I really dislike those milsim games

Nah man i can't
@compact oxide I enjoy some good king of the hill in arma 3
I like bfv for it's gameplay too much
BFV's ship was sinking already, then DICE scuttled it 
I'd probably enjoy Rising Storm 2 more if i could run it better.
Server with 100 players and doing 33v33v33
Arma's just not my thing.
Three faction battles?
Unless this is the current middle east situation or the apocalypse I can't really see that happening
U can play only with 2 but also all 3
Don't make the next game a real war
BF would be funny
Having british, americans and french at once

It's always best to have some artistic license and not have any chance of pissing off realism freaks
I mean even a cold war gone hot alt scenario would just be the soviet union-led govts and the soviet union versus basically the entire west
@compact oxide the thing about BF is that its a good semi big scale game and casual. Turning it into a milsim or a realistic sorta insirgebcy shooter would kill the franchise
Exactly, which is why BFV was a step in the wrong direction
Having a non real war and having all this crazy crap going on would be awesome
Thats why if u want realism and milsim play arma or squad or insurgency: sandstorm since they are focused and developed in that way
Casual sandbox is what I want for bf6
Same
Hell, go full crazy and do steampunk/borderlandsesque
I mean look at cod mw, tbh they seem to try keep the game as a cod alike and not trying to shift it beyond what cod shouldnt be
CoD has basically the same multiplayer formula forever, with experimental tweaks added for community reaction
i'm waiting for someone to go on about how CoD bad
I mean the micros are pretty bad but that's really it
My friend who is a big cod supporter is not getting modern warefare
Burnt out?
Not sure
No Minimap
And i on the other hand who hasn't really touched cod I'm getting it
Maybe he has PTSD from the previous cods
Actual bullet physics and no hitscan
I played for a decade plus, burnt out sometime around Black Ops 3
I'll get cod, I need something other than BFV on Ps4
I'm gonna get the beta and if I like I'll buy
Same
I can stomach MTX to a lesser degree
Maybe when the open beta releases I'll play
i'm heavily annoyed when MTX exists
so i'll just not buy it.
like, 100% of the time, i don't buy it.
I have a bunch of open world narrative games on the ps4 when I don't feel like multiplayer
"why are you like this"
Also was it me or did the Beta of BFV had better visuals
that's probably some form of nostalgia or things seeming better in retrospect
It had better cosmetics lol and faster firing coaxial mgs but that's what I remember
My beef with CoD is that it became a rly annoying twitch shooter for a while
Like I really enjoyed it up to WaW but I thought MW2's MP was awful after a while
Black Ops 3 had a good MP though
With the wall running and stuff
I stopped playing mw2 the day I got hacked to level up everytime I killed somebody
but the hackers in mw2 are so fun
You have the option between the following as a sidearm:
- A pistol
- Dual-wielded lever action shotguns which are lethal at assault rifle distances
people tend to forget those got nerfed
I still remember them being godlike up to the launch of Black Ops
Also the new MW has some pretty cool features to do away with the shit I don't like it seems
TTK seems a little higher and sprinting is de-incentivised by you going into a run which takes longer to bring the weapon up
I hope there is no op perk that everyone runs
hardline pro
There's been some real broken perks in CoD over the years LOL
Commando Pro 
Was that the one where your knife had an attack distance equal to like five times the size of the map?
commando pro
and thats quite the hyperbole
it was probably two people lengths
at most
Doesn't stop the cars from exploding when you jump onto them from a building
the new beretta sounds like it has the same sound as like three other guns???
Do you have a clip of it firing?
If you don't mind him, the start of the new jackfrags vid has it
(maybe go incognito)
Because I know the ribey and the mp40 share a tactical reload anim but that's it for similarities
Oh yeah, we are getting "letters from the front" too
I can imagine that won't go well
What's that?
?
random bits of "lore"?
Don't you read this week in battlefield
No I play once a week
So basically "here's why you should keep playing don't worry it'll get better I promise!!!! Just put some Boins down and we might release Al-Sudan!!!!"
So a dev ama?
I don't think it's a dev ama
There are a lot of jobs I wouldn't want to do and doing the AMA for the BF V community is definitely in that category
Reddit ama go like this
"Hello, I am sound designer for guns in BFV, ama!"
WHERE ALSOONDONE
WHY OUTRAGEOUS ELITE SKINS
CONTENT DRIP FEED
EA SHILL
EA bad
And then at the end, when the poor sod is done answering what he actually can
The "Community" deem the ama a failure
That's how a BFV ama will go down
Actually fuck reddit for a while
At least r/bfv
Same shit in different phrasing
Easy place to karma farm
Ive got for light bolt thompson
For medic
Figured if im going to go medic i go tommy
fuck me another knife.. this isn't CSGO....

I'm just catching up on the reddit and gamescom stuff... wish I hadn't now..
Fairburn Sykes knife
At least COD WW2 had the weapons I wanted from launch shame it's a dead game now.
Honestly if I were in EA's shoes at this point I'd focus all efforts on doing what people love the series for
With the rep the game has and the time it's had out, adding a 5v5 and smaller maps isn't going to bring in a new audience
The tacticool community has stuff like CS and Siege, I doubt BF V will with them over at this juncture
win them over*
Also I'm sorry but
???
EA doesn't care about what people love the series for, they only care about getting as much money out of people as possible.
Everything they've done is because they thought it would be profitable for them in some manner.
I've decided to unsubscribe from Levelcap after looking at his most recent video, which had not him, but ANOTHER person going "THE GAME ISN'T FINISHED" like that's a bad thing and then his comments were filled with "It's such a bad game 😔😔😔😔 smhhh playing bf1 instead"
Like... shut the fuck up.
Besides we all know he's going to upload another video of him getting kill-streaks and shit in BFV and claim that he loves the game regardless of EVERYTHING his new friend just said in that video.
who are you
Somebody complaining, you?
no not you
why are you linking your own twitter
I dont think he had the editor do voice over because he was afraid of voicing his opinion
Me neither
writing a script and recording it takes time and its not always youtubers have time when they are at events
yeah
It still doesn't change the hypocrisy
Gotta get that double revenue
One minute he rates the game at BEST a 5/10 and then he uploads him "Showing off the meta!" Or "getting one billion kills!" Or some dumb shit and it really just makes me want to make him eat his words, especially when his subscribers are just that goddamn dumb that they'll eat up ANY negative media and he KNOWS they will, so instead of trying to HELP the game grow, by showing off the little details or the interesting mechanics, he just says "GAME BAD, GAME OKAY, GAME BAD, ME NO LIKE"
Smash a video up ASAP so you don't get beat to the punch then actually write a script
Pointing out that the reload animations are nice helps the game about as much as saying "ITS DUMB AND I HATE IT"
^^^
The trick is to critique with suggestions on how to improve it
i honestly didnt finish watching any of the youtubers videos this weekend
i managed to watch jackfrags video for about 2 minutes after i turned it off
depressing shit 😄
Of course, but he DOESN'T do that.
He just goes "Game no worky on my computron" and then blames it on BFV not his own PC.
the reload animations are nice. But most people don't care about that.
I care about it but that's because of OCD
well that's great but you are not the majority of the playerbase, i'm sorry to say
I mean, DICE's actions at this point could be down to two things:
-
They've realised BF V is tarnished forever in the eyes of their standard audience, so they're going to put stuff in that will appeal to an audience who are into different things (Battle Royales, smaller squad based gameplay, etc
-
They genuinely have no idea what they're doing and are just spitballing in the hopes that something takes
I think it's 2 for now, but it'll become 1
battle royale was announced before the game was even tarnished all that much tho
personally I think that dice are mostly moving on to new things atm, keeping a minor ammount of devs to produce new content for BFV but mostly just focusing on whatever is next
BF V's biggest problem is that it came after BF 1, which felt like a real passion project with a vision of what they wanted the game to be, how it should look and how they wanted to depict World War I's combat in a way that's engaging for a wide audience who might not enjoy the actual way the war was fought
By comparison, BF V just feels like they were told to make it. Like EA just chucked a brief at them with things people liked: "People like World War II. Fortnite is popular at the moment, so include Fortnite style customisation and a Battle Royale, maybe some building too. Oh, it's really in for companies to be 'woke' at the moment so do something about that as well. You've got six months."
W E J U S T W A N T 5 V 5
Why are people mad at the mermaid skin
It's a tiny miniscule detail that you won't see 90% of the time unless you specifically loot enemies in order to look at it
Like the massive collection of Codex entries, interesting takes on uniforms that incorporated some of the weirder aspects of World War I, stuff like making Cavalry viable and making the tanks feel like they were breakthrough monsters, all that shit vs. BF V which is just an FPS
IDK
I guess because the big demand from the community ATM is to make the game feel and look more like a World War II game
but it already does look and feel like WW2
not everything was a shithole like stalingrad or normandy landigs
and not everything had a dark grey filter slapped on top of it to make a movie
And my knowledge of World War II is kinda limited (I mostly studied Balkan history and medieval stuff) but I'm fairly sure people didn't have Mermaids stuck to the front of their guns
@dark sorrel People left DICE because they didnt like the vision for BFV
Do you expect Arras fields filled with flowers on a sunny as fuck day to be dull in colour ?
BF1 was absolutely a passion project
the BFV community are experts are blowing things out of proportion
Because CoD just went into space again
and everyone was like "fuck that"
and then out comes BF1
I would counter that @zenith pendant by saying that Battlefield I felt and looked like a World War I game despite only having a few maps set in muddy trenches
a tripple A WW1 Shooter
CoD was chasing the trend of enhanced mobility for so long and fucked up with it
Literally nothing on the tripple A game market had that
They hit a bullseye on a blue moon
and it paid off
And other stuff like IDK if you guys ever played Red Orchestra which is set on the Eastern Front and that had loads of maps which weren't crawling around the ruins of a bombed city and that felt like a World War II game
Here we had Trevor Noah, a guy that didn't give a shit, hosting the reveal
BFV could've benefitted from being the WW2 version of the gameplay people loved from BF1
Red Orchestra and Battlefield are 2 completely seperate games gameplay wise
Where one strives for realism (which TWI always does in their shooters), the other strives for a sandbox feel
But we're talking about capturing the look and feel of World War II without doing Normandy or Stalingrad
@stoic breach WW2 version of gameplay from BF1
Aside from MMG and no sweetspot
that's what it is
The big problem BF V had is that they said they wanted to cover the aspects of World War II which aren't seen very often in the media
Which is cool, I love that. HOWEVER, the fact they just made it UK vs. Germany ruined that
Just an updated version of BF1 would've been fine
No
Gunplay, mechanics, alot of things are different
Artstyle is different
Even things like hitboxes are different
gunplay is different for the better without bloom on first few shots, imo
Also, the fact it was initially set very precisely around the start of the war during launch, but the default assault weapon was designed in the final days of the second world war by a cash-strapped Nazi government
Also too many World War I prototypes from BF 1 were ported over
with germans the only team with tanks
Gunplay is just easier in BFV, even though they were so fixated on recoil and making it more difficult
and no AT for assault
They just made it more annoying
They still had SMG's and auto-rifles and shit at the start
gunplay in bfv is just so more reliable tho
They didnt remove spread
Its still in the game
Spread gets converted to visual recoil now
They should have included stuff like:
Battles between the French and Germany as the French defensive lines collapsed
Some shit at Dunkirk between the British and the Germans
Yeah French could've been in the game
French, Vichy French, Danish army, Resistance, British Expeditionary Force, British Army, commando skins, that shit
@zenith pendant They did make videos about recoil patterns but like
eh
Its just spread being skewed in a specific direction
its not always in a specific direction for mmg's btw
the mg42 for example has a tiny bit of randomized spread
MMGs are just weird
like the 3rd and 4th bullets sometimes go left and sometimes right
Yeah after a few bullets its like sort of random
Feel like the mg42 has been nerfed now.
It hasnt
how
BF 1 had:
British Army, Royal Navy, ANZAC, Royal Italian Army, the US Army, French Republic, Russian Empire, Soviet Union, German Empire, Austro-Hungary, the Ottomans
BF V has:
The British, The Germans
😦 😦 😦
It fires better as a burst fire but doesn't matter because suppression isn't a thing so you get one tapped between bursts and ttk.
don't burst then
@dark sorrel Thats what happens when near 100 employees leave the company after 2018
Continuous fire you just get random spread so ttk seems higher, or at least on my end it did.
Bursting is pretty good though since spread decrease is really fast for it
Actually, spread decrease is pretty good for everything except SLRs
yesterday I met an aimbotter cheater in grand ops
he shared some info about the anti-cheat
appereantly, it's stat based
so if your stats get too good, you get banned or smth like that
when asked why he cheated, he answered "I want to come back from work and relax"
fair fight does that
I'm pretty sure that was for BF1
yeah
yay, shame I learn physics for the next hour
in bf1 i remember a cheater joining the game, and fair fight actually worked fast enough to ban him for cheating at the end of the match
even if its the same anti cheat now, i remember it feeling more secure back then
I really don't think there's an anti-cheat that's active at the moment
I see the same hackers on occasion
They are all the way in the back, hipfiring with their MGs, getting all HS and topping the leaderboard
I just want the obvious hackers dealt with
The suspicious players... well, suspicions aren't sufficient to warrant a kick/ban
The obvious hackers should be banned, they'll have to buy a new BFV, DICE makes more money, everyone's happy
If they hire one EA employed CM to kick those super obvious hackers, I think it may actually pay for the salary itself since many of those hackers seem to repurchase the game.
who wants to play some BFV in an hour
Fairfight was used with another system in previous BF games
BFV just uses Fairfight by itself
Its why the "anti-cheat" doesnt work, Fairfight isnt technically an anti-cheat program
It just collects evidence of stat outliers
so it must be either paired with another system
Cheaters wont get noticed if they dont go on massive killstreaks
or have a dude overlook it
I mean it's not that far-fetched, really
CSGO does it so yeah, not far fetched at all
it's almost like being an admin on a private server
you look for suspicious dudes
you spectate them
The only problem is spectator delay, CSGO doesnt have that problem cause its round-based
Yeah
what price would you put for a banned cheater
I'd make it 20 boins for each banned cheater
banned by your hands I mean
Thats actually kinda sufficient as well, since theres never not going to be cheaters
🐸
🏂
ok
guys remember its named Battlefield 5 not WWII right? so what DICE should do is to add other wars like the vietnam war or something like that
i wouldn't get stuck on the name
Honestly they need to fix bugs and overall game health before anything else
I think that's the main issue
They keep adding (and then taking out) all these modes and shit
Instead of just focusing on improving what they've got
If they really wanted mode diversity, they should just implement private servers and let people do customs / mods
Servers would just be "MMGs/AT Rifles banned"
i think i would ban bombers first
they are a curse upon my battlefield life
they fly up there virtually untouched in breakthrough
my only chance is to hope the pilot is either a complete noob or he's already damaged from flying into a tree before i start using the AA
if there even is an AA, sometimes my only hope is firing a panzerfaust and pray
Vehicles should be doled out like juggernauts were in BF 1 tbh
If the defenders are putting up an iron wall, the attackers should get a few tanks or a bomber, and if the attackers are punching through the lines, the defenders should be given some time before the next wave to bring in stationary guns, get a few tanks or whatever
that stuff dont usually help tho
often the tanks hang back way back from the objective
and the infantry that actually makes it to the objectives die to enemy infantry gathered there
Tanks need to be tankier
They were great in BF1 because you take take loads of damage so could push and be brave in them
@icy sluice congrats now delete the game
lol
Vehicle combat in BFV is just super stale
I just like absolutely ruining other people's tanks 
I like camping with tanks
I usually end up pushing with it
Most of the time I get results
Figurehead on the Breda vs Figurehead on the Madsen
that looks cool i donno why people are complaining
It looks like a BF1 skin
you look like a BF1 skin
Like a legendary one
i have no problems with this
Madsen 😩😩
Ehh
I’m more excited for the battered skin we saw
It has a rough and worn look, with barbed wire wrapped around it
jackfrags was so not interested in the new maps it was kinda depressing
Plus, I think that one has more of a chance of being for CC
sniper getting 2 weps and of course assault getting another wep
Jackfrags is a big combined arms person so that's to be expected
Big theory
Activision paid out dice to Abandon BFV to get everyone to switch to MW.
Cause that’s what this feels like at this point. The operation underground map they were going to test tonight apparently doesn’t work 😂
These two maps remind me a lot of the CQC DLC from BF3 but less CQC
I’m with Jack
@supple flume that is a fucking conspiracy and a half mate
They just said there won't be recordings of it
?
jack frags said the new expansion is only 3 maps and if thats true imma stop playing bf5
The Pacific will start off with three maps
two free maps are coming i know but the fall expansion i was told 3
Nvm
i was hoping at least 5
Yeah but 3 maps before 2020 which means more will come
5 is a lot for an expansion
3-4 is the usual number for expansions
My friend was being way too optimistic
they said it was gonna be huge and be a game changer but 3 maps does not change a thing imo
i feel
3 maps is what is usually given with expansions
usually 5 for bf
or 4
but like i said they said its going to change the game
not 3 maps tho lmao
I count 3 maps from Apocalypse
^
i didnt like apoca
3 maps and two skybox ports lmao
looool
London Calling and that other plane one does not count as they're pretty much direct ports from single player
Razors edge
@supple flume That is to be expected...
Turning Tides Imo was the best one
right!
Wasn’t broken before 
Turning Tides added 4 maps although one was very small
Which was odd
They can pull and activision and just reboot BF3 and have it come with bc2 both remastered and id b fine
pls dice
Achi Baba 😩
Why add a infy only map in a expansion geared toward naval invasions and combat?
Never maid sense to me
Bf3 remaster would outsell bfv 100%
It was the inland part though
1000000 percent
It made sense
Yeah but
You mean just fucking make another modern game?
I JUST WANT WAKE ISLAND
I never get the point of remastering a Battlefield game
Kinda just a wasted slot
When they actually gave a shit about making a game 🤡
Imo
Why would BF3 even need a remaster
Yeah just make another fucking modern game
For consoles
Backwards compatibility
Oh wait PS4 doesn't have that lol
Remaster for consoles
bf3 on a new engine would be sick
neh
ray trace and all
Gib 64 players to us console plebeians pls
oh fuck off with the ray tracing meme
You don't need a good computer to run Battlefield 3
lol
as if any of you people would use it anyway.
BF1 just has everything I could want to play
on multiplayer?
yep
Am I an asshole for doing this? https://twitter.com/eastonwaguespa1/status/1164496970586775552?s=21

it really changes the game
do u have an rtx
no cause unfortunately i'm not bloody rich
ok then u have no real opinion
i have an opinion.
Imagine spending $800 for better reflections.
it looks better but runs worse and is absolutely worthless for multiplayer games.

thats ur opinion
I'm pretty sure its more than $800
yes but you said i have no real opinion
exactly
BUT YOU CAN SEE YOURSELF THROUGH THE REFLECTION OF THE WATER
@stoic breach 2080 Ti is like $1.2k
its funny ppl shit on rtx but dont own one
AND THE REFLECTION OF YOUR GUN
Yeah I was gonna say
OWOAH
$1200 for better reflections nice
THE GRAFIKS DOU
the 2070 super is like 500 475
$800 for just a 2080 no ti
Thats still alot
but does it beat the 2080 Ti?
I would just get a old card for less than $300
lmao
My card is worth like $50
1080ti are still like 700 dollars tho
Last time i looked into RTX the impression i got is if you're not running a 2080 Ti, RTX is worthless.
Yeah I should get a $50 card
not true, you can set the ammount of ray trace you want
bf5 is a terrible example of RTX cuz the game dont work in the first place LMO
RTX does work on BFV lol
LMAO^^^
2080 Ti - Only GPU that's decent for RTX
2070 - Will work with RTX on Low
2060 - Don't even bother.
i feel like that's a lie
Looking at people stream it with RTX and shit, it works but then they turn it off because of frame rate
@icy sluice like, do you believe this?
They like how it looks but immediately turn it off because it doesn't feel good with the frame rate
i mean ive played bf5 for 300 hours and half of that was with a 1060 6gb
so when i switched to a 2060 im not lying, rtx looks great. yeah without ray trace on i can get 114 fps
I would rather 114fps than 80
yeah that's a lot better
yeah but with this games awful stutter it doesnt matter how many frames we get
300fps in Devil Daggers 😩
I know I am on console so I am hard-locked to 60... but if I am on a PC, give me like 100 fps at least
Devil Daggers 😩
What a great niche game
yeah. i'm fucking trash at it tho
Same
Do anybody know how the pacific map will look like?
My record is like 68 seconds, garbo
its not just reflections tho, actual performance is better too, makes the difference in close quaters combat, usually the guy with the better pc wins
reflections and better lighting plus shadows has actually helped me see players better and has really helped tbh
thats another reason i don't like fps pvp on PC
Battlefield V would be better with low contrast lighting and high contrast colours
Instead we got high contrast lighting and low contrast colours
Woo hoo
bf would be better if they actually fixed latency and stutter 
Rip people who get enough desync to literally get shot through walls
Damn it I didn't get the Fall Grun skin 
realistically, higher FPS will make more difference than fancy reflections, most people who are decent at video games don't need them
ran into a house and stood there for 2 seconds and got killed thru the wall by a dude across the map. realized he had a 200 ping oh ok game
cant get a high fps with PC frame stutter on bf5
still an issue they wont fix for some reason
They wont fix it because they probably cant right now
too busy with skins you cant buy without real money

DICE's frostbite software engineer left the company
Dice is too busy making the next battlefield and mermaid skins for bf5
last night was in FS, in a hut waiting for the final 8, guy pops up in the window, I got a 2 second burst into his chest, he calmy one shotted me and won
rip in peace
peekers advantage baby
Is that the guy who left yesterday?
The programmer
which only ever seems to apply when you're not the peeker
Oof
im not shocked tbh
The crew's evacuating the sinking boat that is BFV
the two dev heads basically control this game
Imagine if BFV gets discontinued 
its a shame because i think this game could be fixed with one giant update
but nope
i love how u cant say Nazi in bf5 chat
Well duh
like who we fighting? the bad germans
This isnt a ww2 game
yeah but who the bad germans
you know how many german players would get killed by the government 
So they arent nazis
shh we cant say who they are thats bad
You dumb
@solid hinge 

Is either the Red Team
Lets face it
nazis didnt exist only bad germans
Or The Bad Guys From that War in the 40s
BF5 is just ww2 nerds larping with airsoft guns
LOOOOOOOOOL
I love how people care about using those words and outfits and want to "be historic" with germany but when it comes to japanese its never a problem .. nobody wants to be a historically accurate japanese
snakes in the grass
We do
Yeah whos saying they dont want historical Japanese
We just haven’t seen how their cosmetics are handled yet
So we don’t know if we need to complain about that yet
Operation Underground is working now 😌
Playing Rush, you start above the subway. At the beginning of the round, a V1 rocket explodes open the subway below the roads and the 1st set of MCOMs are around the rubble.
I have hope for the new expansion but in the back of my mind i know i may just end up shakeing my head furiously
Then you wake up
yeah I bet 99.9% of people that play BF V couldn't tell the difference between a KMT unit uniform or a Imperial army or navy uniform, without using google, if their lives depended on it, yet can chat for hours about the different German uniforms without reference
I can tell the difference
I've never played BFV and never will
Thats a completely different topic as well
Thats probably due to the common view of ww2 as us vs nazis and dday
only get bf5 if its like 20 dollars or whatever the EU equivalent is
@solid hinge lets just focus on what’s actually in the game rn
None could ever tell the difference between a IJA and IJN Battle flag either
Whole pacific is lesser known
@solid hinge i don't know shit or fuck about german uniforms
I will only play BF1
or military uniforms in general really
Yeah lol
i need to reinstall bf1
You must
German uniforms are stylish because they're made by Hugo Boss 
I don't think Hugo Boss has those skills
Well, if they didn't design them, at least they were of well-made quality
Very well made. I admire the uniforms themselves.
Well they might as well go out in style or come home in style
probably were quite expensive at the time
Though considering how many uniforms were made, I'd say that expense was the least of NazGermany's problems(they received funding anyway so)
pricks with too much money.
NEWS: #battlefield-legacy-titlesV Operation Underground gameplay footage will not be shown publicly until after Chapter 4, says Battlefield Community Manager @PartWelsh. Keep in mind that Chapter 4 ends on September 19.
tfw we're genuinely going to get those weapons in September
roadmap didnt even say August
delayed an entire month
@formal valve next weekly reward is also going to be a knife
Reward: Fairbairn Sykes Knife.
I thought that was today's reward
Ahh nvm
You’re right 😂
but you're probably right on next week being a knife 






