#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 1241 of 1
But I get what you mean
technical as in mechanics
Bad netcode, for starters
@crimson jungle that makes no sense, considering bfv works at launch for most vs bf4 not working for month after launch...
BF4 is mechanically superior and more balanced
and had much better networking than BF3
so obviously, they did learn
I just can't stand the feel of weapons in BF4
10Hz logic loop in BF3 lol
So TECHNICALLY, they learned from their mistakes
yeah BF4 guns are boring to use
yall dont get the arguement
yeet
@midnight nimbus is correct
and @crimson jungle
Didn't like some of the balancing, either. Thoroughly disliked the progression and unlock system, too
Alrgiht
Boogie is correct?
do we all think Hardline is a shit game?
And I never found a map I really enjoyed, honestly
Even though it is technically superior in all regards of DICE made Battlefields
Never played hardline, so probably so lol
its up to individuals to decide what they think is allowable for problems, considering bf is one of the most technical games out there MP wise, i will let it slide with more problems AS LONG as the core gameplay is functional
Had alot more customization then BFV
Hardline is a mechanically superior BF4 with an infantry focus
Hardline is technically superior to BFV and BF4
More customisation does not automatically make it better
@solid hinge It worked at launch
nearly no bugs
I'm not disputing that
it's probably the best BF for infantry
No game breaking ones
ran flawlessly at launch
mechanically, the only knock you can make against BFH is terrible gun balance
I never played it
Lol
I'll just throw my dollar in for Battlefield 2
it actually got worse after the rebalance
Bf4 still my favorite
L85A2 in BFH was lol tier
BF2 is rose-tinted
0.9 SIPS
to say bf should have less/equal bugs as something like mario is kind of a joke
in bfh
one is much harder to even get working
No?
after your first shot, the BFH L85A2 immediately jumps to hipfire accuracy
and launch K10 was insane
That’s sad lol
I mean visceral did SP games and applied SP gun balance to a MP game
Hardline wasn't rushed
1942 doesn't even feel remotely like I remember it
it actually did work good lol
when gun balance is one of the easiest things to do
Hardline is an excellent game
it's still fun now
if it launched without the BF in front of it, it would've been fine
So comparing BFV and BF4 to eachother is like
@crimson jungle are you saying bfv is unplayable?
apples and apples
@crimson jungle its rushed sure, its not broken, broken means it doesnt work, and it does work. broken is bf4's launch, which you keep dancing around.
I think the only thing BFV does better than BF4 is gun mechanics/balance
but you show the stark difference
bf4 didnt work at launch, bfv does
No
i dont see how you keep reversing that
Bfv is definitely not unplayable
Every patch theirs more bugs
BF1 launch was at least very solid
bf1 was solid save gas nades
who said bfv launch was great?
No one
dont see anyone saying that...
launch in general wasnt good
A broken bf4 was more fun than the current state of bfv @dense bone
objective
but its fact it was actually broken
I think the only thing BFV does truly well is gun mechanics, but that's enough to make it playable for me
BFV is shit
save my love for WW2
and how i support DICE
I still back it all day
but if we do comparisons
its so far one of the worse
I have friends who play BFV only to JU-88 because that's still fun at least
hold up the point is, bf4 was unplayable at launch. Bfv was playable at least
i cant compare bf4 to bfv because bf4 was my first pc mp game, so i have rose tinted glasses for it
I've never managed to play BF4 for more than 20 minutes without feeling deep sadness
and i get a good amount of fun from coordinating with friends to stomp
Man I love bf4 so much
It doesn’t matter if it was playable because the gaming environment was different 6 years ago
It was my first bf game
My first was 1942
my first was 1942
lol
Shit game. Love it
BFV is a letdown of what was promised
i dont think people understand what im saying, at all
we were promised alot in the trailer and leading up to launch
thats why it was shit
Where's body dragging?
@dense bone I agree with you more or less
body dragging is a dumb feature anyways
im not looking for people to agree or disagree, it just seems people have no idea what im saying
lol
DICE forgot the first rule of software development
Its a valid point for some
better to underpromise and overdeliver than vice versa
DICE overpromised and underdelivered
so for people to rag on bfv for being "broken" while saying bf4 is their favorite is contradicting
they didn't have to overpromise at all, promising very little would still catch a hype train bc it's a new AAA title
of an established franchise
bf4 didnt work for month for a lot of people
That’s the whole point he’s trying to make.. he isn’t saying bfv is better than bf4. All he’s saying is that bf4 didn’t work at launch at all. Bfv did/does
I mean it still didnt lol
they could've released BF1 set in WW2 with current BFV gun mechanics and it would've been excellent
with BF4-style tanks
lol @midnight nimbus is not wrong
they had a polished platform with an actual working UI
BFV UI/UX is abysmal
nothing was wrong with how it worked in previous games
nothing was wrong with BF4 style vehicle balance, it was excellent
I went into BFV after christmas, with no expectations, really. I got it as a gift from a friend, so I never payed for it, either. So I guess my perspective is skewed, but I thoroughly enjoy BFV. But considering a lot of people who love BF4 don't seem to like BFV, and I really enjoy BFV and can't stand BF4, maybe there's something there, who knows.
BFV is fun, I wont lie there
gun mechanics are the only big improvement with BFV, and even then, I question a lot of the implementations
but saying it launched better, nah
I thoroughly enjoy BFV with friends, because that's what it's built for
Don't forget BF4 used battlelog originally
needs to be a bit more BF1-esque in skill ceiling
the revive system and being able to swipe their guns when they are downed
@dense bone your so wrong
fun shit
^
it didn't launch as good
selling doesnt mean anything about its launch state
I don't think anyone can argue battlelog was a good UI
this revive system is hot trash
Battlelog worked lol
the animations are one thing
I could use emblems
you couldnt play the game
@solid hinge selling has absolutely nothing to do with launch quality
revive system is trash af
you can play bfv
It worked, but was it good?
animation overload
the revive system is hella fun but trash
thats a better launch
the extremely specific angle you need to trigger it is horrible
like horrible
Also, sometimes it just didn't work
and it's an unnecessary level of risk for medic revives
its better than waiting for full revive in bf4 tho
the animations are awful for both revives, it's erratic and violent as shit
lol
And it needed to reload assets completely every time you joined a server, because it didn't keep the game running in the background
Ye breaking through cover and teleporting through walls for a revive aint fun in bfv
that shit's cost me good killstreaks
It does
attrition is just an awful mechanic all around
It does have alot to do with laucnh quality
can't defend that
Yeet
bbububuh teamwork
If it worked
well
yeah it didnt change shit as far as teamwork is concerned
and didn't fuck itself over
attrition is a good mechanic but every team is shit no matter what so it doesn't work well
with pulling half their work because cosmetics
i still get resupplied with meds and ammo by others just as much as in bf1
and actually focused on the gameplay
gamemodes
etc.
attrition is a good mechanic in a fantasy world or a PVE game
Probably would of done a lot better
^
it had alot of controversy walking in
It had good mechanics, such as @midnight nimbus with attrition
BF1 ammo count and health regen is fine
being able to hold a medpack + health regen to 100% would be great
did anyone actually think medics weren't useful enough in previous BFs?

They should of tossed out the whole cosmetic idea
In detailed interviews with Eurogamer, EA CEO Andrew Wilson and DICE general manager Karl-Magnus Troedsson said the development teams behind the Battlefield series had learned their lesson the tough way after Battlefield 4 launched in a state many players labelled broken.
Battlefield 4 released late last year for PC, PlayStation 3, PlayStation 4, Xbox 360 and Xbox One, with a target of 60 frames per second and 64-player multiplayer on next-gen consoles.
But at launch it ran into a number of problems, most notably in multiplayer, with many unable to play.```
find me a reputable quote that is this damning for bfv
everyone ran medic in BF4, and it was helpful
and just made different battalions
cosmetics is just
how easily do you want to be seen
and how big do you want your hitbox
i'd argue each class is even more useful in BF4 than they are in BFV
I appreciate the breaking of engineer meta on big maps though
yes
lol
as cosmetics instead
Would of worked alot better
like we wouldn't have a fake tank
true true
valentine is just a meme at this point
being able to rip through a squad with a single shell makes sense for a tank but
Jesus fuck
none of the others are able to do that
combined arms is hard to balance
with like 50 bombs
i see my last massive text that is hard to ignore was ignored... hmm.. telling
@dense bone I saw
I think titanfall 1 did combined arms the best of any recent title
just gonna take you a while to find that quote ehh?
@solid hinge how do you counter that?
No point to answer
combined arms is a meme
it makes ur kill streak really high and people who properly grinned their own killstpeaks are hard to find because some retard killed 80 npc's on easy
I genuinly dont care
meanwhile I struggle to 50 and people shit on me
you did
So you’ve acknowledged you’re wrong?
?
You stop caring when you realize you’re wrong
and suddenly when i ask you to prove your stance youre not interested
No
👌
I mean you want a response?
damb ight
I can get one lmao
the battlefield fandom gettin heated
should only take 3 minutes, like it took me
We had an argument the other day. I proved you were in the wrong, and then you just stopped caring
I mean
your so far playing it off everything you got is factual
Before that quote
Give me statistics
but when i ask you for quotes you suddenly dont care?
stats never lie unless its bf1 with hidden stats
😂😂amen
and stats dont exist for something like a game being broken at launch
only quotes
which i found and showed
Is what?
why was the launch date pushed back
is "no"
pushed by a month?
imagine thinking that bf5 is better than bf4
1 month
your not backing yourself
you said months
then 1 month
now several again
make up your mind lad
:^)
bfv was delayed 1 month afaik
did you just unironically use the word lad
Im gonna banter cause @untold cliff and i were having a good conversation
on an internet chatroom
bf4 didnt work for months
@untold cliff I did, lol
lmao
you said 1 month
what a chad
Get your facts straight
@tepid oracle I never ever ever said bfv was better than bf4
check 😄
Welp
Was it tanks?
something about tanks yeah
Nice
everything BROKEN
the fact that u can reverse right off the bat into the battle before it even starts
Still does
valentine is redonk
hannut memes
lmao
After armor buff for tanks, they were viable
kinda sad how they had to fuck over damage models in BFV bc CQB became too erratic with the networking at the time
yep, absolutely everything i see about bf4 i said months
at least BFV returned to BF3-esque damage models
@midnight nimbus wdym
oof, i see 1 that i forgot the S for
like if it wasn't bad enough already, you can change ammo types I think
on the tank.
screaming
but with context its obvious i meant months
literally howling
BFV's universal 4BTK is excellent
Ew no
and BF4 launched with something similar
but youre ignoring again because you got nothing
but with the launch networking, CQB was way too erratic
good to know
dude BFV semi autos are the logical conclusion of the telemetry DICE got from BF1
but bolts
bolts were fukt
They are basically a downgrade
in BF1, people were clicking slow so that semis had no spread increase or hrec anyways
so BFV cut out the middleman
BF1 bolts are the peak ye
but bFV bolts
sweet spot is just necessary to keep bolts relevant
speaking of peaking
why tf does nobody PEAK
sweet spot is omega nut
In BF1 sweetspot wouldnt let me get the kill
Like in the chest
I get the leg it wouldn't
BF1 sweet spot is upper chest only
why are you using a long range weapon in CQB
that should do something
yeah you get an 80 damage chunk
why should a dominant long range weapon also OHK in CQB
that's what slug shotguns are for
I agree
those dont work
slug shotguns = CQB sweet spot
slugs ftw
slugs work in this game now?
yes
their OHK is still shit
since increased fire rate became a thing
but they work
they work better than some of the snipers now just because of fire rate
but at least BF1 maps made CQB pretty viable
bf1 slugs and the hunter were redonk
BFV maps are just bad for CQB
m e m e s
that's why snipers need sweet spot
Its more of the glare for me lol
if they can't drop people at long range well, what's the point
glare is fair feedback for people who can get OHKed
That gets countered by a G43 w/ a 3x with no glare
well the G43 can't OHK you
Like? If I use a 3x on my sniper why do I get glare
BF1 glare/sweetspot was really well designed
because people reeeed about it
no need for 5 btk a guy cause med packs lol
It feels so, worthless using a sniper
Semi's are basically the best option
yes
ZH-29 guarantees the 2 shot most of the time
i use AG m/42 at range
thats the thing
for me
why can someone use a DMR essentially
at range for a sniper w/ no glare
isnt zh always 2 shot.. no matter what
SLRs deserve OHSK sweet spot
if SLRs have to have glare, they should be able to one shot to the head at certain ranges
slrs should only 1 shot headshots under soemthing stupid, like 15m
nah they're long range guns
they are long range
Maybe like 20 and under
they should have like 40-75m OHSK
if they gave them ohk at range, they would be fucking good
ts just such a shit meta against snipers
you can spam them
everything can easily counter it
yeah, long range weapons should be good at long range
but they are still good at range
CQC you can't
SARs benefit from headshots at range, SLRs should too
see
like AG m/42 has infinite 2 tap to the face
Yes I agree
That's the one thing
they do benefit, but not in a BTK difference
why isn't ZH-29 rewarded for headshots when it's far more punishing
Indeed
having OHK at range would just be too much
and they have the same TTK to the body
as head
OHK to the head at range for SLRs
It makes no sense
not a lot of things make sense, its a game
Like what if the PTRS-41 comes in
True
It's originally a anti-tank gun if im right
like SLRs are 1.7x HSM, from maybe 50-75m, the ZH-29 just does 59 damage
SLRs would be fine with a bigger mag
does it have to be a ZH reskin?
I want nagant and garand
bolt bullet velocity vs other guns, recoil, health, revives, nothing really makes sense
Velocity in this game is barely any good to lol
BF1 designed infy really well overall
@daring terrace bigger mags, better bullet velocity, and OHK headshots at short range imo would be ideal
MAS-44 velocity 👌
Enfield is like the best sniper
or Krag
then any semi outdoes it
K98 if you wanna meme or play SRR-61
you have Webley for CQB OHK headshots, SLRs should be for ranged OHK headshots
Webley's OHSK range is kinda shit though tbh
and its base spread
well its a sidearm
I like krag
Enfield is good
bring back the BF4 swagnum
With 3x lol
3x 1911 was good fun
you know what i noticed guys
you ever change your origin so you can link stats @midnight nimbus ?
Did Veteran players get anything in BFV?
it's back to kht120
Like in BC2, BF3, and BF4
i had to change it
I used 3x + suppressor on my 1911 just to make people mad when I killed them
says not found
I want a remastered so badly now
no AT abilities
Very true
recon is viable
Viable against vehicles
it just lacks behind other classes
Flares, spawn beacon
and sniper decoy!
https://imgur.com/a/xEsZq49 @dense bone then idk man
and betties
AT rifle for recon pls
just post it in bot commands
give AT pistol/nade launcher to medic
nah no 1 shot to enemies, keep it at like 80 damage or something
force bipod like BF1 AT rocket
what's the ross like??
95 lol
yeah
make it a MMG
as a sniper
high hipfire
stupidly high
but bipod it and you got power gun
80 damage, but if you're using it on infy, you're just wasting AT ammo
From AW??
or yeah, i'd be cool with AT rifles being bipod only primaries
with sweet spot
yeah
needs OHK ability
fat sweet spot
Martini sweet spot was never nerfed
knowing dice
Yeh
Somethin about it was nerfed
they'd probably give that to the assault class
friend of mine stopped using it lol
the limb multis were glitched
they got fixed to match all the other sniper rifles
well
nvm about martini
just make it a Bipod only primary
Slow ROF
it'd be an assault weapon
high damage to infantry and can hurt tanks if your good
No, PTRS-41
lol
yep
assault
I doubt it
as a primary with a 6x scope?
anything decent goes to assault
yeah why not
AT rifle would be fine with irons
Back to WaW for me then if that happens
2x zoom irons
im joking
but i really wouldnt be surprised if assault keeps getting more broke shit
mfw DICE removes zoom customization going from BF1 to BFV bc people weren't using it
Yeah
I mean
i always put everything on minimum, but the option was nice
the PTRS did have a scope
Man can’t wait to try the new sniper
Technically
I’m kinda excited for it
me too
Haven’t had a chance to get on since new tow chapter
fingers crossed it's not shit
I mean it can’t be terrible
None of the bolts are shit compared to each other really
Single shot bipod only
BFV weapon balance within classes is very good
then have 6x scope lol
Yes I agree with that 100%
BFV weapon balance between classes is another thing
Hello
How would bipod down make something one shot?
SMGs are actually the strongest they've ever been in BF, they're just terrible for the maps
Ohhh I thought you meant like kill in one shot
Bipod only for accurate fire
Okay gotcha that makes sense
well it'd do high damage lol
I mean make it 1 shot infantry if it loads 1 round
And bipod only for accurate use
PTRD should be able to go w/o bipod, just with terrible ADS time
only can reload it when bipoded lol
and sway
But reload would have to be very slow
Nah, It would be better bipod only
and reload faster from the bipod
Skill cannon the shit for it
Drops bipod to reload
Make it something Recon has to sacrifice DPS for
PRTD should be able to fire from standing to make it worthwhile against PRTS
like something absurd like 600ms ADS time from standing would be fine for PRTD
unless you got the 1200 rpm boost of course
that's what G43 was in the alpha and it was just unusable
i'd ultimately rather see AT rifles as recon gadgets
Canadian* I mean
and lever actions as primaries
I really don't see lever actions returning
As much as I'd like it to happen
as well
doesn't thematically fit, but it'd be fun
people can fire lever actions pretty fast irl
could be compelling alternatives to SLRs
I miss lever actions. They’re just fun
I'd see the levers as a easter egg reward
Remember the mares leg from bf4? Lol
Was so fun to use lol
1895 Trench = GOAT
1895 trench was god
Suppressor and 4x acog lol
I loved steamrolling fort devaux lol
i wish 1895 Trench were a Trench/Patrol hybrid variant
True true
gets Trench mods, Patrol scope + Patrol movespread
maybe
would've been a really compelling pick
the thot patrol
it was fun and meme-y
the trench version was amazing
pistol carbines are in the files for BFV
I was somehow very good with it lol
but stats are absolutely troll tier
yeah
ZK > everything
maybe they are just filler lol
like i'd take the thot patrol over any BFV pistol carbine
De Lisle Carbine MP stats are just
unusable
De Lisle is cming lol
it's like 110-120 RPM
should be
so we bring that
but not the Welrod
Dice wth
I want a more close quarters infantry oriented map
i'm only hype for Chauchat and MG30
MG30 should be fun
Chauchat is just 🤤
Same @solid hinge
Chauchat bet will get nerf
genuinely incredible stats, optic choices, and spec upgrades
nah, Chauchat is a SAR sidegrade
@midnight nimbus do you know anything about maps
it's fine
lol
Close quarters was the most underrated expansion, imo
Cause will caen ever come
Caen for BFV
future maps don't show up in datamine
make it the Locker or Metro
see guns are easy
damn
Locker 3.0
Caen for BFV. If anyone remembers DOD
you could pump out guns like no tomorrow
then you know what im talking about
Or 4.0? Which is it
gun balance is easy too, with the new spread formula
you just slap in a rate of fire, and slap in hrec values as necessary
like it's virtually impossible to put in an absolutely troll-tier or busted gun in at this point
Yep
SAR balance formula is really easy to follow
i would like to see the SKS come in with the G 1-5 damage model and 450 RPM
since it's 10 rounds
I love how when a gun gets added to any game people are like “OH MY GOD. THIS IS THIS MOST OP THING EVER” for like a day or 2
But then it just ends up being pretty normal lol
launch KE7 needs to come back
i think all autos need less hrec
push the ZK to 0 hrec, and the Bren to 0 hrec, and adjust all other autos accordingly
the balance formula is incredibly easy to follow
SMGs: lower RoF is always better at >30m, higher is always better at <30m
ARs: lower RoF is always better at >35m, higher is always better at <35m besides 1907
LMGs: lower RoF is always better at >50m, higher is always better at <50m
Hrec?
horizontal recoil
Ohh
usually you balance on spread increase, hrec, and RoF (and mag size)
but LMGs have no spread increase, so you balance on the latter three alone
Lewis = KE7 that gives up RoF for more bullets
yeah, BFV changed up how much you compromise for each of these factors
in BF1, you give up more DPS with mag size than you do in BFV
see: Lewis vs Huot in BF1 vs Lewis vs KE7 in BFV
Huot outperforms BF1 Lewis a lot more than KE7 outperforms BFV Lewis
Lewis seemed meh in comparison from my view
Huot was extremely good
Thing is, the Lewis has alot more rounds
like easily one of the best in game
yeah, BFV Lewis is a more compelling pick than BF1 Lewis
because the marginal penalty for mag size in BFV is lower
yep
and BFV doesn't punish increased RoF as much as BF1 does
indeed
compromising between factors in BFV results in giving up much less
ironically
so versatility picks in BFV are kinda meh because min/maxed picks don't give up as much for maximizing one area
like KE7 really doesn't give up much ranged ability for its RoF as BF1 BAR does
bc Low Weight was extremely strong
Low Weight = best LMG variant in BF1
Also guys for the MMGs
except the Burton ironically wouldn't have benefitted much
Don't hold the fire just rapidly tap your mouse
BFV gets Madsen and Chauchat soon™
Its reduces the recoil
Madsen gets 40 round option
no rapidly tapping with LMGs is stupid
like that's the worst thing you can do with LMGs in BF1/V
@solid hinge With the MMGs i mean, it makes there recoil go nonexistent
in BF1, rapid tapfire jacks up your spread like crazy
Ik lol
I just want the BF1 Preorder weapons to come to BFV
same with LMGs
we have the mosin filesi nthere
recoil gets easier as you hold LMB
The Dygtarev could be a new medic gun
mosin is new sniper lol
Carbine variant, cant do anything higher then 3x
then the A2 can go to support
It wouldn't be difficult to do, since we pulled alot of weapons previously. Ross, Chauchat, Madsen, etc.
i want semi's back for the medic
not stronger than semis or LMGs in BFV
BF4 medic was meta bc assault rifles were the best guns in the game
assault rifles aren't close to best in BFV
metro would've actually been perfect for BFV SMGs
perfect ranges for them
<30m aplenty
Assaults should have smg's and shotguns like in bf1
Metro 1945
close range
medics should have AR's and semis
I like semi auto assault
either he's good up close or long range
but SMG assault is fine
idk i think assault should be a close range class
or SMGs as all class
oh no
bc BFV just isn't a close range game
Bring back multi-class weapons
I like how support gets repair tool
ranged medics lead to a lot of medics not in on the action
breaks engineer meta
i agree with dice
ah
ARs aren't that incredible at range
Mebye
i do just fine with them
Stg with 3x hits
hell, one of the guns i have over 2kpm is the mp40 which i use for ranged
being unable to clear at midrange makes the class a no go for me
Or the Astra 900 when it comes out
but you can clear
CQB in BFV is miserable
and you can safely move around the map with their smokes
BFV is to open lol
and revive
Essentially
you can midrange with medic, DPS just sucks
and you don't have unlimited smokes
You need a Metro style map lol
if you had unlimited smokes on cooldown, I'd consider medic
or a Locker, maybe even a Fort De Vaux
if youre running out of smokes youre doing it wrong
but the fact that smokes are basically required for movement is stupid
I just sit back and heal
its not required
I play Field medic constantly, or Mp28 Assault and not heal
you can get around fine
lol
it just helps a lot
@dense bone Bro you kinda do
medics are in a super good spot
I always kill meds
anything outside of Devastation or Rotterdam is just painful as medic for me
their SPM is the highest
even Rotterdam is a bit much
?
my SPM with medic is the highest but I hate the class
Meds need smokes
i just wish i had an AR with my medic
Medics completely need smokes
ive never had problems, theres always parts of the map that are congested
to move
you just gotta stick to them
StG medic is perfect
I mean I snipe people lol
@midnight nimbus speaks facts
even hamada has places for medics to shine
This is true
medic forces you to sit the zerg
yeah
lol no it doesnt
sitting in the zerg = JU-88 bait
i play medic solo
it does lol
Played a match with a guy on Hamada last night and he went like 50-15 with Thompson
Stuka dives are proof
having to be close to everyone = V-1s fuck you
well, i dont zerg AT ALL, and im sitting at some pretty good stats, so something is working for me
anyone up to play with me?
Lol, just played with someone named Dirty-D-Trump
What you on ?
@gray merlin try #lfg-pc #lfg-xbox #lfg-playstation
so yea, people saying you gotta play one way, and i dont do that, with better stats than 99% of people, you obvously dont HAVE to do that
1% of stats still has a lot of variance
like i sit within 1% for a lot of stats and I'm not that impressive
depends on stats
truth is most people are awful at the game
like the first sector of Panzerstorm breakthrough falling within the first 3 minutes of internal playtest lol
but still doesnt negate the fact that i have top 1% of stats doing something you guys say doesnt work
internal playtesters are just bad at the game
that i NEED to do it one way
for most people, medic is just painful to play on most maps