#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 1019 of 1
yeah
hurl hortlor
British soldier takes aim
imagine what happened if they killed hitler
Couldve killed him right there
i dunno
@steep radish
maybe shit wouldnt have been so different
LOL
this is some great man of history shit
what the fuck
@amber notch lol
who dat
all the evidence right there
cool
boom
more trans gamers plz
exposed
HAHAHHAHAHA
lemme just bounce realllllll quick
welp gn
i have school off
bf players don’t work
Due to snow
nice I am off as well
@steep radish back to RAAF tomorrow
you life in germany right? @steep radish
@amber notch whats RAAF
@solid hinge murica
nice
royal ass assassinators funky
Royal aus airfroce
who isn’t murica nowadays
Wait
Australian air force?
murca bad
Mhmm
yeah we weaponised magpies
Australia doesnt exist
anyway, im going back to my show

I only have 3 days school in a week 😉
michael are u french
nope haha
we realised if you dangle a chip infront of a flock of seagulls tied together with elastic bands, you can put a guy with a rifle on it and it'll just keep going, boom, airforce
do french have 3 days of school week
I dont know lol
why would you be in the military smdh
being in the military is nice @amber notch
i heard the austalian army has an extremely racist culture
which isnt that surprisingly really
coz BROS WITH GUNS
broing it up
edgelords n shit
pow pow
no but iam interested
@steep radish
because post scriptum was post scrotum
its still pretty early and the worst part imo is the sounds.
I leave now
I wonder which direction hell let loose go tho?

More tactical
jess can be a dude name
or more battlefield stylish
its less tactical than post scriptum
does anyone even play post scriptum anymore
closer to battlefield than squad or post scriptim
if its like battlefield
i thought it was gonna be like squad, but ww2
Ok maybe i give it a shot if it is like battlefield
instead it was like drinking shit
gameplay makes it appear way closer to Battlefield and closer even still to red ochestra 2.
hmm
so I read something pretty interesting
"Fun Fact: In ww2, medics usually only had carbines or pistols. Because previous treaties only allowed them personal defense weapons, as they weren't allowed to be in direct combat."
its main game mode looks really unique
guess it's why medics use smgs
pdw ftw
mp40 is a pistol
a MASCHINENpistole
smgs are just superpistols
yikes
@amber notch

hahaha nice name
thanks 😄
I am gonna sit behind my computer until the trailer drops lol
such a good theme song
Name of the song: The Beast - Milt Buckner Download all the soundtracks here: http://www.mediafire.com/?0udlxmy10mw (This song is not included, and you need ...
better battlefield theme
I mean it wasn't made by the devs but it's still lit
The score in BFV ain’t bad at all
@dusky saffron Who made BC1 theme?
guess thats a rip
It's called "The Beast" by Milt Buckner @proven pagoda
this is what you see if you were inactive on the main menu for about a minute
I miss Bad Company, 1 and 2 btoh
mhm mhm
I miss this menu screen
BC1 was my first battlefield game
back in like
2012
the grenade launcher in Bad company 1 was a primary weapon
it had serious "oomf" that later games failed to replicate
I remember multi
any new title suggestions for my upcoming upload - Endings of last tiger?
I only remember hating the healing system 
mm mm
mhm
It's almost impossible to get hyped for games now
It was easy to just get pumped to play battlefield back then
BC3 will hopefully be just as good
@amber notch you best be online in 30 matey potatey
They need to make it not take itself seriously
Dudes what scope do you prefer on the M1A1? I hate all of them except the reflex but it has a darker tint which makes targets harder to see
I wiish they could get another partner dev
No scopes
to make the BC series a thing
Irons all the way
Visceral was a great company to have around
yeah might have to get used to the iron
oh yeah they got shut down
and they fucking killed them because Hardline didn't do great
which wasn't visceral's fault at all
Hardline was fine IMO, just shouldn't have been Battlefield branded
Hardline had a plethora of problems
though
which is why it wasn't popular
it's what started the trend to what we have now ig
trend of what
like the episodic campaign
DUMDUMDUMDUMDUMDUM
I liked Hardline's campaign tbh
DUMDUMDUMDUMDUM
Alt
go watch the clip I sent earlier
and watch the grenade launcher
that thing is an underrated gem in gaming
yep
that grenade launcher is as iconic to BC1 to me as the energy sword is to halo
@dusky saffron F4
@solid hinge you seriously need to chill
BC1 was very unique in its startup
It was out during like
what, modern warfare 1?
It was lit
BC2 was better in gameplay but the story kinda shot for references
oh no it was good and stuff but
it was the only game not trying to take itself seriously at that time
BC1 was the grandfather into something great
^
BF3 took a huge turn with its aesthetic
ye bf3's pseudo realism is an acquired taste
I mean
well thats not true
I don't enjoy milsim but I don't enjoy arcadey either
pseudo-realism is my fav kind of shooter
milsim is gay
airsoft is gay too
but it's kinda run its course i think to some degree
UNA CASETTA MEDICA *tosses pouch
guys
we need another light hearted game
I rather prefer nerf guns instead of airsoft guns
BC3 pls
more powerfull
Do you think the BC3 rumors were true? @dusky saffron
wats bc
Bad company
any new title suggestions for the endings of last tiger for yt
btw is BFv still like 1hit wonder?
When BFV wasn't announced and they were saying "WW2 or BC3 is it"
and both had seriously good evidence
supporting that they were both true
yet here is BFV and we haven't heard anything on BC3
i returned the game cause i'd just spend the whole watch in the fucking spawn queue
@proven pagoda well in the time before battlefield v we saw a guy and he said the next battlefield game is badcompany 3 it could be yes.... because something is coming in february as well and its not like battlefield v related
I think dice la is working on something
I mean both have different directions in style and gameplay
but might get me wrong
They wouldnt release 2 Battlefield games back to back
Here is my source:
but with how they're going, they'll push for more pseudo-realism
I hope BFV works
because WW2 is great and it has a mountain of potential
but it needs more sales and they need to get to work fast on fixing it
the latter before the former
It reached 14 mil physical copies
Read this tweet
1 mil less then bf1
and it will make you hyped
and that's just physical copies
even if bfv sold half as much
it would do fine to continue on development
remember ea had a plan if things went wrong for battlefield v
I very much doubt BFV is actually about to outsell BF1
It still could be
bF1 was hyped massively
mhm
remember the awesome trailers?
and hyper casualized
I didn't enjoy it as much
and bfv was the opposite
I only liked the mechanics
advertised poorly
of certain things
BF1's trailers were A+
but the game was dead after a yEAR
its just a bad marketing
I still get CHILLS watching the gamescom trailer
Also Bf1 didn't last long
They didnt need to invite christopher noah
especially with how late the dlc was
That guy didnt know anything about battlefield v
is dice gonna do something regarding cheaters in tomorrow's update?
with https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymwXbF1VTKU @dusky saffron
None of the late night tv show hosts know anything
but most people are complaining about the woman with iron arm, but that was an actuall thing in WW2
remember he said battlefield 1 had a co op mode
that was one of the best trailers
battlefield v is more historically accurate than you think
lemme see
V is pretty accurate
it's just playing with fiction as well
I'm glad for that
in what way @soft breach
watch this video
give history some creative function
@proven pagoda a lot of the outfits and items are historically accurate
even ratburner
Also
The events happening in game, rotterdam for example. And the iron arm
Bombers come in to bomb the city and 3 flares ar efired
it was the dutch marines
^
the arm is real for a disabled person back home
not for using a gun lol
lol are you guys stupid
I know the brits are used for gameplay reasons
that's all I ask for dice
I am dutch

they could have just not did Rotterdam until they could get some dutch VAss
The dutch people were fking pussies in ww2
even if they still had british uniforms it would be better
flamethrower should be a assault archetype that gives up at weapons for flamethrower
In the backround of Arras you can see large convoys with tanks driving in the horizon
@solid hinge Your marines were not
i really like those small details
true
make them like real life alt.
They talk about "untold stories" in BFV
Short range
But like a feel like The Netherlands are only good at sea
Flame troopers should be useless 99 percent of the time since its super short range, no explosives and vulnerable backside
I'd prefer being a powerhouse at the cost of resources
not nerfing something down to make it gameplay "capable"
powerhouse how ?
People don't like superweapons Alt
nerfing ? how flame throwers were pretty useless in real life
Bet they’re actually maps cut but were in development in BF1 @proven pagoda
@opaque cipher wym
or sturmtiger
The maps
what about them
@pliant geyser You could change things for gameplay reasons
crocodile and strumtiger are vehicles that can change the tide of the battle.
why do you think our weapons don't jam
Someone said some were maps that got cut in development
Seems logical because of how bad some of them are
what are you referencing
or that a rifle bullet from a shotgun can one-hit unlike others
you mean in dev for bf1?
And they get to reuse them for “untold stories”
these maps are clearly made for bfv tho
I mean Arras seems pretty BF1 to me
Hello can anyone help me
I don't think so
?
@upbeat oriole you have to give it somewhat of your own thoughts my dude
the maps are going to look similar
didn't you just ask for a previous title?

alt I've decided shotguns are good currently
yes
and you're not allowed to nerf them
i think BF5 is also going to have that portable last ditch flamethrower Germany made
Buff M1897 tbh
it's just that people don't know what range dropoff is
it had like 2 second burst
also
1897 only needs to be able to shoot quicker after reloads
have you seen my melee compilations @proven pagoda
the delay needs to be much smaller

Yeah it’s suppose to be the middle ground between the 12g and the Drilling
I checked recently and I'm top .1% in dogtag steals
But it’s not quite there
why do your melee animations look super sped up
because BFV sped them up
But guys
what patch?
you're way too vulnerable during them
stuff for bug fixes and upcoming stuff
should be solo too
oh nice nice
mhm
ive had some problems when i unlock a new gun
more weapons are coming up this chapter
that it says the server doesnt allow the gun when i attach a 3x scope
but after the round ends
it lets me use it
other than that its fine so far
yeah its a server-sided thing
I’m keen to see how they pull off the fucking Darne
oh i see
most of the bugs should sort themselves out
The thing we have one schematic and no picture of
16 squads of 4
but assignments and a few other things are wonky
i see i see
I need to make a squad I guess...
i love the assault and the medic class
have fun tho 
thanks!
I hope its free
im taking a short break taking a look at the better guns to use
Otherwise gonna search for people in this discord
Who plays battlefield on ps4 here btw?

All pc gamers probably
Nah there are some ps4 players here
Oh nice
not recommending Suomi
Suomi is a meme
LOL
but it's a good meme I suppose
I played battlefield v on my gaming laptop but i felt like it was too bad for it...
never aim down with it though 
is that the one that uses 20 bullets in 0.01s
ye
MP34 all the way
hahahha

you could get an extended mag for 50 bullets
@dusky saffron did you play the bfv alpha? :)
i picked it up once
it was fun but before i knew it
but I saw the stuff there
the ammo was gone
Awhhhh
henlo pow


I booted up BF4
First game back 49/16
Plsss my eyes
Feels good
gj

I wish BF4 was remade to have the updated engine and mechanics of bf1/v
Like wall climbing
the planes are fun but so hard
I was in de first and second alpha but it was with a lot of bugs lol
yeah I bet
I should be sleeping since I have an eye exam in like 4 hours
😂
My flechette M1014 hungers
Play with the qbb fellas
I really want a Combat role for Support that only has a pistol and gadgets but instead gets a choice of buildable HMGS, AA guns, AT guns or Howitzers.

Qbb is op
Flechette is king
@dusky saffron delete that
Why



FUCKING GAY FORTNITE
Wall climbing tho
I HOPE THE GAME DIES ONE TIME
of Battlefield
Fucking spider men populates the snow
pls stop


nah but
bf1 had a lot of good mechanics to give
and a lot of bad mecahnics
so basically ds2
mhm
yea BF1 tried some things but most of what it added was bad.
Otherwise it’s actually good cover
@pliant geyser this
like they added
- a better mounting system
- no more counter frontal
- sliding
BF1 onwards walls are just another type of paper thin destructible
are there any stat track websites?
See that mountain? You can climb it
@chilly thunder https://battlefieldtracker.com
Battlefield 5 BFV Stats! Check your profile, weapon and vehicle statistics. View the top Battlefield 5 players on our leaderboards and how you perform in the battlefield.
BF4 tank combat 💦💦💦💦

thanks @dusky saffron !
Bf4 tank combat sucked
A matter of who is a better driver and good at timing
i think the tanks are fine here but im not sure
I have the best map in mind for a battle royale map 1. Operation locker but than metro of Londen 2. Arras 3. Argonne forest 4. Monte grappa 5. Caspian border
There you have a br map
Active protection is no match when I put two rounds into your ass
Shoot me back, you’ll die first anyways
Reactive armor active protection
it would be cool if tanks had a weakness and strength system with its armor

I can easily C4 u
maybe simply angling ur tank should make it more resistant to shells
armor system in bf 5 is too simple i like War thunders system
The boost key actually existed back then
I mean it's more complex than bf1
it would take a lot more work than what its worth
to be honest
i love the tiger
It’s hilarious seeing people drop onto me and spam C4
its very intimidating
And I just hit the boost
the only issue if anything with bfv tank mechanics is the inside delay with aiming
And zoom reticle being fucked
yuh
i want the tank combat to be to the point where a 37 mm gun wont do any damage to a tigers frontal armor
and people jumping in and out
only rear shots hurt
of the fucking tank
LIKE GET YOUR ASS OUTTA MY FACE PLEASE 
other than that it's lit

Honestly I just want faster tanks
naw tank speed is fine
My score in a minute was 1000 in battlefield 1
This is why BF4 is my fav even with the reactive armor active protection spam
they feel like slow heavy behemoths now give them armor and firepower to match that speed
I mean
the only buff that heavy tanks is
is more armor
since they get outmatched by medium tanks currently
locational armor alt
Frontal armor should absorb almost all damage from light tanks
AA tanks should do zero damage to the frontal armor of a tiger
aa should be anti infantry and anti air

aa should be vulnerable to all tanks
though
AA is anti infantry
I feel so lit when I use the panzer 38t or the staghound
yea as it should be ptar
Unless you take the 3x 20mm on Valentine or the 40mm on Flak
Then it’s anti jack shit
Those things are so badly balanced 
Siblings of the infamous 2x 37mm on the Stuka
👌
@proven pagoda It's funny because the first thing I noticed in bfv is that the melee was incredibly sped up
makes me sad
Tanks in BF4 were basically all advantages 0 compromise
so I hope we never ever see them again
and those people who used them often and only got good kd with them should question theirselves about life
Vehicle play was a major issue in bf4
Like bf4 was really good but there were still issues
Tanks in BF1 were too massively OP
Like, there's few things in life worse than being a vehicle whore
Artillery truck had disgusting accuracy
tbh
arty truck in bf1 is scum
Did you even play bf4 to compare @tribal ledge ?
vehicles are supposed to be powerful as fuck
They would hide near spawn points and just murder people
tanks should feel like tanks
^
BFV tanks feel like shit right now
They aren't supposed to have sniper rifle accuracy
Yeah, tanks also die to one RPG or ANTI tank missile in real life
so you want that too?
Tanks suck in BFV rn
no u
Tanks shouldn't have infinite ammo
I mean, no, that's not true @sleek tartan
And infinite fuel
yes, that is truew
Even in WW2 without modern protection they could survive panzershreks/bazooka strikes
sure, key word being could
just depends on how good of a hit it was and what type of tank it wass
most of the times one was enough to kill all the crew inside in a fire they couldnt escape
thats uhh
ONE
because they often got disabled in various maneouvres or situations that didnt imply getting shot
including getting shot
Shermans literally exploded in fire with tiger shots
shermans had the lowest fire rates of any tank in the war
fact.
that shit is literally nazi propaganda you've grown up to believe
because the germans sided with the americans and british post war and not the russians
You literally have no fucking idea of what my sources are or my knowledge, yet you refuse to give yours when asked and not even display facts

the 88m canon on a tank could literally make the Sherman blow up
tiger canon*
He's right though. The Sherman fire rate was low even before the water ammo mod
Where did I state the Sherman fire rate wasn't low?
im just saying that it literally exploded to the 88mm
and it did
you're trying to say everyone dies as soon as a rocket hits the tank
it doesnt change the fact that sure, many times not everyone died when one got disabled.
"unknown" - tank randomly explodes
"literally exploded in fire with tiger shots"
^
@proven pagoda that's total bullshit
I just showed a statistic that says on average 33% of the crew dies to a anti tank rocket attack
I said that one was enough often to blow up the whole tank
like a panzerfaust or shrek
and it going into fire
except it isn't
which is totally true
fuck yt iam uploading 4k 60fps videos but it is showing 1440p 60fps
they made direct designs to counter that from happening
the sherman almost never "blew up" on first contact
The only realistic place a Sherman would survive a Panzerfaust is the front
look up what wet ammo racks are and how they prevent fires and ammo cook offs
The US army did a study of Sherman effectiveness against heavy German armor. Their conclusion was that in reality, whoever fired the first shot was more likely to win, even with the Sherman vs. tiger
Tigers took a hell of a beating though @quasi mulch
showing that on average 33% of the crew dies in a rocket attack
that is nowhere near 100%
and thats if they get hit by the rocket
Absolutely! @dusky saffron
I am not fucking saying that everyone died every time
dude
you are getting annoying
I am saying that the tank went in fire
you can fucking just leave the tank ebfore you die
because they desgined the tank to not catch fire
the only thing in the tank that can catch fire is fuel and ammo
The tank did catch fire everytime the engine area got a big hit
fuel you can't stop, but that also doesn't get hit from the front
Oh man, me too.
every-single-time
lol no
not even
find any statistic that says that the sherman caught fire everytime it was shot
There's a working tiger in a British museum. I kinda wanna visit just to see it
specifically in the engine if you must
thats literally fake news lol
and see how internet is full of references
to how the Sherman literally was a moving hell
the deathtrap myth was propagated by one man
and he's been disproven over and over
sure man
the sherman was one of the safest tanks in the war to be in
far safer than the german tanks
disproved over and over, source?
Pun intended?
checkout my new upload guys - if you are free 1440p 60fps cinematic endings of the last tiger - #streams-and-videos
give me one of those disproved examples
no
you gave me an old statistic copy paste from the US army non the less
after the wart
that shows nothing but a percentage
of how many people died
you think the US army lies?
They sure did many times
go ahead and prove
but it isn't even relevant
I'm waiting
I am a tank expert, I play a lot of War Thunder
lmao
Sure man, im gonna buy a Sherman and blow it up just to prove my stance
when there's a million people on the internet that have showed that indeed the Sherman was a moving trap
played some ww2 games when you were little and saw shermans dying to the big bad tigers
Keep disregarding it as nazi propaganda lol
bet my ass you're american 😛
Tigers had a way better gun but far fewer were made and their armor was not great
plus tigers were in constant need of repair
Sherman was in every conceivable way a better tank than the Tiger
It was a between war approach to tanks, totally unviable for the roles it was given. It was prone to disabling, it didn't offer any advantages at all over the opponents
the only reason it was victorious was the sheer number
in a 1v1 a Sherman literally stands no chance against a tiger
It was never 1v1 though
1v1 sherman vs tiger was never gonna happen
let him speak
So it’s not really a valid metric to rate a tank
1v1 sherman and a working tiger would never happen either
@pliant geyser @solid hinge let him answer
The role for the sherman was to be the main armoured artillery of all forms and the main task tank
yet it didnt offer protection for the main weapons the axis used against tanks
or even range to attack them from safe distances
so tell me how it is viable in its role
other than by flooding the enemy
I don't think that was really its role
Okay, what was it
it was made to support advancements
Only around 1300 hundred tanks were built in the entire war, Germany was fighting on a lot of fronts
Sherman was Infantry support primarily. Other vehicles were the tiger killers
Only around 1300 tiger tanks I mean
I'll ask a more roundabout question here
Did you guys ever read about that guy who owned a Sherman, parked it on the street and was told by the homeowners association that if he didn't move it it'd be towed?
He was like "lmao k"
If the Sherman didn't do that role, what tank did?
Just by the amount of tanks and little variety that the US had, and the general bad state of tanks in the allied side, there was simply not that many options to the Sherman
so what were the Tiger killers?
you talk about how there were few tigers
Btw you know the image May 23 battlefield will never be the same
I mean the US almost never fought Tigers
but how many tanks that weren't Shermans the allied had?
Quite a few
Numbers
Including the Russian tanks
I was in the server of ee community when they discovered it
Honestly I'd love to move to the US just because you can own a tank there.
Depends on if you're going to allow tank destroyers
I just want to make sure you do too
Or if you mean what the army called a tank
Reality is that the allies in Europe had very little armored forces, and out of those up to 90% were shermans in 1941
If the Sherman didn't fulfill the role it was designed for, what tank did?
None.
Whats an example from another nation you can bring up
There was also this German guy who got arrested for owning a tank. He was taking it for joyrides around the village he was in
The Sherman had to be a jack of all trades of a tank in WW2
and obviously dindt excell at any role
it was simply the amount of them that was produced and later moved to europe that made it viable
that's just wrong
You can’t hate on the motherlands tanks
well name an example
The Panzedr IV was a great multi task tank
lol
The Stug was the most effective tank in the war
lol
do you know that?
Glorious stallinium armor @solid hinge
The StuG was quite good yes
possibly Germany's best armored vehicle
but I don't know how you think the pzIV is better than the Sherman
Not at all simply very effective cost/usability ratio
T34 and the KV1 are the best tanks, fight me
The panzer was faster, better armed, better armoured...
They don't need optics either. When they fire the main gun on the T34, Stalin's blessings guide the shell to the target @solid hinge
You guys didn't know that the reveal date of battlefield v was discovered by an battlefield 1 easter egg?
Panzer definitely didn't have the mobility, you're just wrong there
There is objective data at your disposal
Post some of it 😛
@solid hinge wait whaaaaaat
@quasi mulch om let me tell you the story
Not going to lie and say the Sherman's off road capability was fantastic until they started putting wider tracks on them
Does playing for a week make me a veteran?
but at least the Shermans eventually made that change
So what happened was remember the fort de vaux zombie door? @quasi mulch
PzIVs were stuck with those poor thin tracks the whole war
Yeah!
@proven pagoda The max speed of the Sherman was 48km/h in roads (and in theory) reality is that it didn't achieve that most of the times back then with the wider tracks they needed to actually make it usable at all in country road
They translated that in morse code
yes, that is what I just said
the Panzer could indeed hold its max speed of 38km/h very well
The morse code gave a site
They site was battlefieldwillneverbethesame
You're shitting me
Holy shit, that's deep
"Panzer IV Ausf.B (Sd.Kfz.161)
The long version of the tank’s name is Panzerkampfwagen-IV (7,5cm) (Vskfz. 622) Ausfuehrung B, (2./B.W.). Krupp-Gruson completed 42 Panzer IV Ausf.B tanks between May and October 1938, a further 3 of the contract for a total of 45 vehicles were not completed due to problems with critical parts. The main changes of the Ausf. B to the previous Ausf.A were the thickening of the frontal armour to 30 mm and a new 300hp Maybach HL-120TR gasoline/petrol engine connected to a six-speed SSG-76 transmission, offering a top road speed of 40 km/h (24 mph)."
That's just bullshit
i don't doubt that the PzIv could go 40kph on a road
but you don't often get to use roads in combat
which is why I talked about the issue of having those thin tracks the PzIV had the entire war
IDK if you want me to buy a panzer and film myself doing 40km/h
but pretty much all historians agree that since it adopted the 300bhp it could reach well over the max real speed of the sherman
and yes, I can't prove it beyond that
Armor wise they're about the same
Gun wise the Sherman is either worse at anti tank with the 75 or better with the 76
This is why i love battlefield
The Panzer got all the upgrades for the turret ring, the tracks and so on much earlier
and they worked great
They are always refreshing
Don't forget Germany was pretty much tier top in techonology back then
They were trying a lot of things, yes.
it's Hitler not being able to foresee costs that fucked it all
Hitler had very little to do with Germany losing the war
No, it had a lot to do with it.
hitler didn't have much say on what actually happened
he didnt have a good business expertise
Hitler was not really that much of a deal in terms of what the army gets equipped with
For example the STG44 would never have been made if it were up to Hitler
and he kept insisting on using resources for stuff that hardly made enough difference
He didn’t like the StG, the generals snucked it around and passed it into service anyways
If you think hitler had a big say in what went on with the army's resources, you can just look at the STG
Hahahahah
Lol
He’s mostly just the mean guy with a stick up his ass








