#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages Β· Page 616 of 1
Well fair enough.
assumedly the scene would take place at the edge of the city

so your character would survive but be severly injured
to show what suffering many people went through after that bomb
Ye
One thing to remember is that the major reason why Hiroshima and Nagasaki had such high casualties was Japanese construction at the time. Massive thermal pulse over a huge area + wood and paper city = firestorm.
i remember in history we watched a documentary on the bombing
and they sort of created like a mockup of several japanese lives just minutes before the bomb
and fuck it hurts so bad
That's why fire bombing was very effective
like, they based it off real artifacts found
a melted tricycle, a lunchbox full of carbonised food
It was certainly an effective way of stopping a war.
yeah
Yep, the fire bombing of Japanese cities caused far more casualties than the two nukes did. The nukes were simply psychologically devastating in a way that massed formations of bombers weren't.
As Japan had a very no surrender attitude
Ye
plenty of people suffered from cancer, the cities must have been uninhabitable for years
The nukes were a very effective way to say that they wouldn't win
of course
Well the cities were rebuilt pretty fast.
they were probably necessary in the way
They just didn't learn about the effects of radiation.
Ya
but we can't say that america is morally superior just because the bombs were justified
it was and still is a horrible war crime
They didn't have a background to be able to say "Oh hey, this is probably radioactive" so they went in, cleaned up, rebuilt, and had a spike in cancer rates.
just as much as any other country
Well no.
every country did horrible things
I'm gonna agree it's a war crime.
Although the radiation from weapons dissipates fasterish then like from Chernobyl or such things
But it still pales in comparison to the Holocaust.
Ya
of course
It was the lesser of a lot of evils
but again, there is still no moral superiority in this case
Let's not start on whataboutism when it comes to war crimes.
Well the allies probably had a slightly better case then axis, who were all about one race, which is ironic since they were made up of two very different races
@toxic briar Radiation from nukes can dissipate faster, depends on the burst height. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were airbursts to maximize the radius of impact, a surface burst would have left a lot of nasty fallout with long half-lives.
Ya
yeah
the radiation didn't last long, but still would have made everything uninhabitable for a while
Also there's the ever-pleasant thought of salted nukes, thank god nobody ever deployed any of those. Though that's more of a Cold War thing.
@shrewd zinc Well no, it wouldn't have made it uninhabitable.
Aight bois I gtg
Look at Crossroads Baker.
seeya levi
They had soldiers on some of those ships the day after the test.
I have to work on my least favorite part of history
When the ships were hot as hell.
oof
I like it once we get to the revolution and stuff but the whole getting there bit I find boring
yeah but to clarify my earlier argument
Cya around bois
i don't think america should necessarily be condemned for dropping the bombs
but i think people need to be shown how it affected the people on the other side
as said in the battlefield 1 prologue
'behind every gunsight'
So, on a more happier topic.
Who's excited for what vehicles to be added in the game ?
i quite like what they've added already
i do hope we see some of the other countries' stuff obvs
and some of the BF1 stuff that was reused in WW2
Its rather pale in comparison of that they can add. :3
the armoured car from BF1 was also used in WW2 so we could see that return
I do hope they add the Maus at some point.
What are the light tanks being added again? Also, love hearing the Jericho sirens
the FT-17 was widely used by Germans (for defensive purposes, but DICE can bend the rules)
B17 bomber would be nice but needs to be balanced
perhaps a squad call-in
I hope planes are good even though I am not a good pilot
also you know those anti air guns that have four cannons?
I don't fly
i'm not sure what they're called but i'd like to see them
As far as i know.
The Czech Pz38t, Staghoud armoured car, Sd.kfz 251 Halftrack.
The Flak 38
staghound is a light tank
@shrewd zinc That's either the Flak 38 flakvierling or the M16 MGMC.
the half track is a transport vehicle
Well, really the Maxon quad .50 caliber mount.
yeah flak 38 flakvierling looks like it
it wasn't vehicle mounted so Flak 38 sounds right
The puma
Fliegerfaust!!!!
I hope dice includes that on some maps
i remember seeing it in an old war movie
based on the RAF
and i also saw it in RAID: WW2, you get to use it in one of the missions
The Flak 38, Flakvierling was used on the Wirblewind and on some Sd.Kfz. 7/1
yeah true, it is on the Wirbelwind
but an infantry operable one would be interesting
Goddamn, finding the original pair of USS Skate post-test pictures is super fucking hard. They've been scrubbed from Wikipedia. I feel like someone has been doing some revisionism.
perhaps if they have any fort-style maps they can have that
Oh yeah stationary gun emplacements
can't you view the page history ophi?
I hope so cause aa in bfV was uselss
@shrewd zinc Probably could I just went to google. National Parks still have them: https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/swcrc/37/chap5.htm
What even were the stationary AA guns in BFV ?
Those two pictures were taken a day apart.
the AA was pretty okay honestly
Like 1 aa on narvik in open. So short ranged pilots could use canons outside of the aa to kill u lol
the stationary guns in BFV were a british one I think
Let alone rockets
@mossy badge They were Flak 38s, but single barrel.
huh, hold on
Ah.
Also 2 dmg vs bomber
Yeah that wouldn't do much, unless you get a concentrated group of them firing at stuff
The Flak 36 would be much, much more effective.
Hopefully aa tanks are seperate spawn to tanks as we'll need one up all thr time
maybe
Oh and 4 rockets to kill a tiger tankπ
but considering they're on existing chassis they do look like they should be upgrades to tanks
I was okay with bombers in the beta actually. Aside from dropping on the point they didn't really have much way to influence things, so being relatively immune to flak wasn't too bad.
So maybe it'll be useless too
but i think it was mentioned that they are separate
Fighters got buzzsawed by AA, so that was good.
yeah a flak 38 flakvierling would be cool though
perhaps on a map where only the attackers have bombers
planes*I
Meanwhile it takes the valentine like 3 shots cause of the gun upgrade to kill tiger frontally
like perhaps you're attacking a fort or whatever
Yeah that's extremely annoying
Also the churchill howizer meant beating tiger easily
so you get planes while defenders get positional advantage and better AA guns
The Churchill AVRE ?
I hope armour actually works in the full game. In beta it was a flat 14 dmg
Why go vierling when you could go zwilling?: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/12.8_cm_Flakzwilling_40_1.jpg
Well they were heavy AA intended to deter bombers.
cause most emplacements are generally for a single infantryman only
Radar AA?
huh
8 maps, cod is shipping with 15 maps. I hate cod but wtf DICE
those heavy AA guns may just end up as setpieces
They weren't radar guided... radar assisted.
Cod maps are small ast
ah
Asf*
but still, they may end up as setpieces
@mossy badge The gun laying data was generated by radar.
Also operations makes 1 map into 3
to destroy planes that stray too far out of the map
Yeah, Radar assisted
that logic has no weight
They weren't automatically laid, AFAIK, unlike the M16 MGMC when hooked up to the SCR-584, but they were radar guided.
Maybe use squad points
look at BF4 and the content given to us
like the four guns do look pretty awesome, you gotta admit
Also unlike cod bf will have constantly new maps for free @solid hinge
Apples to oranges
lol aren't all the cod maps just three-lane maps
uninspired etc.
quality over quantity
anyway, what other stuff should they add to BFV
any guns you guys particularly want to see?
not really, BF V currently has 1 map that looks promising
as everyone has probably heard me say before, I wanna see the Owen Mk 1 and the Charlton Automatic Rifle
Wz. 35 if they add anti-tank rifles, also Type 97 AT rifle.
In the past BF had maps that were lot better
I'd like to see the DeLisle Carbine and Welrod pistol as well.
Grand Bazaar, Seine Crossing hell even Metro..
Cod was once good...but they thrashed the maps after BO2 ....also BF has always been much better
PPS-43
but this time its open fields
welrod would be fantastic though
i dunno how'd they balance it though
like, the Liberator is already the meme weapon
so would it be like, powerful but risky?
kinda like the obrez
Honestly, just the M1919A4, the Lee Enfield that's already in the game and the Mg 42.
I'd say give it to some infiltrator-like combat role, basically the pathfinder archetype from the early reveal.
the paratrooper archetype
Let 'em have it as a sidearm to complement the suppressed pistols.
Actually I really liked that BF1 included a lot of weapons I'd never even heard of before
I hope they include some weird shit too
And yeah, make it punchy but slow RoF.
they said the paratrooper archetype was returning at some point
i assume it'll be it's own class
@sharp merlin The ZH-29 isn't niche enough for you? π
Was it paratrooper? I coulda sworn it was pathfinder. Ah well.
BF3 , BF4 Bad company 2 was good. BF1 is trash
like if it's a paratrooper archetype, do they get different spawn locations or something?
the pathfinder archetype is for recon, and still gets sniper rifles
I associate pathfinders with stealth more than paras in general.
Nah bf1 is good...just could have been better
BF1 was alright
I managed to fit in 300 hours
nowhere close to my bf3 or bf4 hours but now bad
i hope that Combined Arms gets a 'classless' mode
not*
where we spawn in with appropriate weapons and can pick up new ones
BF1 was as casual as it got. I died more by explosions then freaking fire fight.
Catered to Casual
Bf1 was working in being simpler
for example if you started off a Combined Arms mission via paratrooping, you'd be able to equip stuff like the M1a1, or the FG42
BF3, BF4 were far superior and ambitious game
Which was good in some ways
and there'd be weapon crates to pick up other weapons
Agrerd
Way to op
i wonder if there's any other weird weapons they could add
like the nazi belt buckle gun lol
Oh, just for memes, one other weapon I want to see: OSS punch gun. It'd have to be a melee replacement though.
imagine just thrusting out and shooting someone with your belt buckle
I think when DICE LA makes the next Bad Company 3 hopefully it will return to good old Battlefield days.
i assume the glove gun would be like the ballistic fist from Fallout:NV
it'd have to have some sort of downside though
'good old battlefield days' is subjective to when you started the series
technically BFV is returning to some ideas of earlier battlefields like 1942
or BF2
BF3 and BF4 are very different to the original battlefields
I have been playing battlefield for over 12 years now.
I feel to this day BF1 was the worst battlefield made. I feel even hardline as bad it was had some cool mechanics in it. Like Gun Bench
@shrewd zinc The ballistic fist from NV was inspired by the glove gun, so yep.
well i mean i'm not saying you're wrong momo
just saying that what you define 'good old battlefield days' is different for each person
i definitely see why people don't like BF1
it can be fun sometimes and looks amazing
but but BFV is like 5x more satisfying, I already miss it
ophi, what do you think would balance the glove gun?
I think its headed in the right direction in comparison to BF1 but i don't like that they are keeping lot of the content that should have been released as part of 60 dollor price tag as tides of war gimmick.
to be fair, we are still getting those things for free
it's a double edged sword
like yeah because of tides of war they're holding it back, but also because of tides of war they get more time to work on these things and perfect them
like i want to see Combined Arms as much as the next person, but if it was shit at launch, maybe not so much
@shrewd zinc Well it'd end up something like the combat medic, where you get a guaranteed instakill melee as part of your class package I assume.
oh yeah true
free is subjective, with each tides of war stuff there will be some method of monetization. Its a buisness at the end of the day
though i think the combat medic still gets takedown animations
yeah there will be monetisation
but it's all on cosmetics
so any of the non-cosmetic stuff they release won't be monetised regardless of when it's launched
You could add a recovery period on the punch gun, to reload it.
and tbh i'm happy to buy some cosmetic stuff, doesn't really make me better at the game but like if i can give my character an aussie slouch hat, i'm all ears
Basically trade less up-front delay for more post-kill delay.
yeah ophi, that sounds like a good idea
like it could perhaps do say 50-60 damage a punch
so you could kill a lower health person faster
currently it's 35 for a normal melee
The really, really oldschool Firearms knifer in me says it should be a point-target melee weapon.
The knife in FA would instakill if you headshot someone with it.
But took a few hits to the body to drop someone.
Punchgun someone in the head, frag them instantly. Would be kinda silly.
hmm, sounds interesting
imagine if every melee had that feature in bfv
and they had like, head takedown animations
stabbing someone in the eye
FA didn't have takedown animations, it was a Half-Life mod, you just nailed someone in the face and they dropped.
True, not a huge fan of takedown animations, but I get why people like them.
i'm already imagining some
like for a front-facing head takedown with a knife, it'd go in their eye
if you hit them from the right side with a club, you'd clock them in the face and they'd clutch and stumble before callapsing
heres my idea
from the front with a club:
smack them to the left and downwards, they're dazed and barely moving, then smack them upwards to the right
kachigga
idk
ooooo that's brutal
yeah that would work for a 'head' animation for sure
and they'd sorta just get flung backwards
club has gotta be my favourite melee weapon though
i hope they keep the BF1 melee animations cause the club animations are great
I want to throw my helmet at people when i'm out of ammo
lmao
i do actually hope they do like a full-attrition gamemode though
like on reddit i suggested a domination-type gamemode but objectives are supply caches
and like the amount of ammo your team has depends on how many supply caches you have or something
and give supports and medics limited resources so you ultimately have to return to these caches
I dunno, but just when DICE said that these caches become sub-objectives, it made me think of that
perhaps don't even make them official 'objectives', but have it be a sort of TDM-type mode and have the caches there so players fight over them
maybe even have that be an element of firestorm
i dunno it just sounds so cool fighting over the scarce ammo
damn
shoulda posted on the forums instead
i dunno the reddit just seems a better place to post than the forums
r/battlefieldV/ that is, not r/Battlefeidl
Reddit and Idiots trying to act smart are synonyms at this point
more people tend to post their ideas on r/BattlefieldV/
Not saying everyone who uses Reddit is an idiot
compared to Battlefield forums where it seems to be a lot of complaining
I use it sometimes
Some sub reddits are fine, but most i've seen that's related to gaming is ... well special for a lack of a better word
π
I've seen worse from both sides...
Specially when the Controversies just came out...
The bigger the subreddit the more chance of stupid people in it
yeah but r/battlefieldV is properly moderated
so you see genuinely good stuff there most of the time
Goto r/Dota you'll find some of the most stupid people, for ex there were like 15 times more people watching the TI in China than the rest of the world (a lot of em were bots ofc) but some people were saying otherwise... "Welll China has 1.3 billion people sooo uhhh if you actually do the math it's plausible haha I'm a scientist btw feel free to ask me about time space continuum I do that shit in my free time"
Unironically
The 2nd hardest game in the world isn't dumb
That just goes to show the mentality of a typical ledditor
Convinced he's a geniuse but is actually braindead
i don't actually know why dota is so popular
like i dunno
it doesn't seem like the type of game to get really popular
like nobody i know in real life actually plays it
yet it's apparently one of the most played games in the world
It's like league but actually takes skill and is complex
Same reason that lots of sports are popular. There's enough framework to keep it understandable, enough flexibility to allow for good plays and complex decisions, and it's readable enough that you can understand the big picture at a glance.
League has waaaay the fuck better UX though.
It's aids if you playing it at a lowkey semi pro level like me
Dota's UX is a miserable heap.
5k mmr
100% of the game is available to play from the moment you first open the game
Unlike league
But since league is a lot more casual it has more players
League has better UX and readability, better movement (Turn rate is dumb), and IMO better skill uptime/usage design.
League owes everything to dota, it's a long story
anybody trying to squad up for bf1
Turn rate is a hot topic ye
Dota has better itemization, entry-level availability, and to some extent skill ceiling, but it's hampered by really bad UX and some questionable decisions about creep denial.
Almost all the new heroes being added have super dope turn rate
Try playing Willow then switch to QOP
Unfortunately, League is also kinda run by people who hate some of the things that make the game great, and are flip-flop designers.
You wanna commit suicide
Witness the whole "We hate the jungle, let's try and kill it!" back and forthing.
They're scum. Business wise and company wise
And their general inability to balance AP/AD champions effectively.
Eh, you might as well say 75% of BF is stolen from Quake.
Nono.
First rule of game design: You cannot copyright gameplay.
That's been held up in courts repeatedly.
The guy who 'made' league was working on Dota. He backstabbed the community and jumped ships. Even tried to destroy dota
Some went to league, some went to HoN, some went to DOTA 2 once Valve figured out the rights...
So did the HoN team, and Icefrog was pretty acidic back towards both other teams. It was the classic bad breakup.
Nobody was in the right.
Hijacked the original dota website and was advertising people to go play league
Yeah I am partisan don't get me wrong. But those fucks deserve what's coming for em. Now with the sexual assaults n all the other shit I sincerely hope they go down in flames
Sorry back2battlefield
Do we 100% know for now what the 'care packages' will contain?
Heh, no worries. I mean I'm not a Riot fan either, but I feel like the discussion about the origins of MOBAs shouldn't be influenced by the current scumminess of Riot. The Dota dev team breakup was bad all the way around.
Got no idea what, I'm gonna guess not panzerschokolade though.
Can't wait for EA to pull an EA
Speaking of panzerschokolade, there's something that would be interesting and pretty dark for them to cover.
Widespread use and abuse of amphetamines during WWII.
honestly looks like bf1's st quentin
st chamond
isn'tthat exactly what that is though
i honestly can't see it being anything else
God the chamond is such a goofy fucking tank
its so cool tho
so we know the mark V was used at some point in WW2
and the FT-17 was used quite a bit
and the armoured car from BF1 was reused
But the mark V I didn't know about
but i wonder if anything else was also reused
Mark V was used in battle of berlin (possibly not functionally)
Didn't the Russians have a FT copy?
the Soviets took four Mark V Composites from Bulgaria and then used it in 1941
Ye
the last and the only authentic from the time
all other 16 out of 17 were melt and destroyed after the war ended
They were too heavy to tow so the british just scrapped them
there's some 1:1 replicas around the world but the only authentic one from the time that survived is that one in australia
I feel like with teamwork a Mark V composite would be able to work in BF5
Automatic storm
yeah
again, if the Mark V was pre-spawned on the maps it was appropriate too
you'd be able to use a lot at the start of the round, but you'd need teamwork
like for the soviet case:
maybe on conquest there's one for each team and then two objectives have one
Breakthrough would have two for the soviets one sector, then spawn another two later on (would work well as defenders cause they could just spawn further back in the map). Or one each sector
Maybe frontlines would have two at each home base
Combined Arms would either have a small 'encounter' where you have to destroy all 4, or would have three friendly AI controlled ones, and then one usable one that is modified depending on how many players there are
If they reimplement rush they could add just one to help the players
and then the battle of Berlin could have non-composite Mark Vs with two cannons
I love how most of the tanks in bf1 were experimentals
let's be real; only 500 or so actual Mark V tanks were actually seen on the battlefield
compared to the millions of people who have died on the western front
not alot of people really saw them
true i suppose
but it's the most iconic tank of the war
also i kinda wish they included Female and Composite Mark Vs in BF1
It would have been nice
But if you were a real soldier at that time you would have never actually seen tanks in action
It's a one in a thousand chance of seeing once
I dunno, they do a horrible theme with the actual theme of ww1 in bf1
If you really want to be real bf1 is a steampunk fantasy version of ww1
well
didn't mark Vs get used quite a bit later in the war really?
cause they were a late-ish invention
Cambrai saw use of Mark IVs rather than Vs
I can't read apparently.
Just assumed since we were talking WWI use it was the Mk. IV
I'm good with the concessions they made to increase the variety in BF1 weapons
Single shot rifles were still very powerful and useful and felt very different than BF4 but there were a range of automatics as well
Hey guys
Hi
Is it true that on bf v there is less destruction than on bf1?
Like with the doors of wood that you couldn't destroy it on the bfv beta?
I think it's probably going to improve during release
destruction is better in BFV
and there is def more of it
like how in narvik you could collapse the entire houses
couldn't do that in BF1
hi
hii
So i joined this discord for the bfv discussion
Like in terms of weapons vehicles and ma0s
Maps*
And also are we getting new factions for bfv other than great britain and germany
Lol you have got to be the most depressing welcomer @swift socket
There will be new factions coming with The Tides of War
But first only germany and great brittain
Heβs not wrong
In the same place where all Soviet weapons will be, looking at it realistically
In Soviet part of Tides, whenever it happens
Meh
I mean, it's fairly obvious
That a Soviet MG will be with Soviet part of the game
Putting aside that it most likely wouldn't be an MMG
Something from DS-39/SG-43 duo would make way more sense as far as MMGs go
What vehicles and weapons you people like to see in bfv?
And i hope italy is added in
Like countries id want for tides of war
Italy,usa,ussr,japan,china
I really hope japan will be in the game
I'd love to see the Thompson SMG, and obviously the M1 Garand. Lol
Hmm lets see for me
M1897 trench gun,Nambu,Arisaka Type 77,Type 100,M3 Grease Gun,PPD 40,PPS 43,
Now vehicles
For the soviets id prolly like a BT-7,T-34,KV2
The BT-7 should be very fast to
M3 Scout car looks quite fun.. not the deadliest of vehicles but still quite cool
I hope each countries vehicles actually are different in balance
Yeah, as long as one doesn't overpower the other.. well within reason anyway
have an equal fight with tanks.. though I think light tanks should have a disadvantage against the heavier tanks.. give or take on weapons .cal
Ya
Like ignoring reliability issues an early war Sherman may have less armor then a panzer and a slightly worse gun, but it's faster I believe
Although tbh reliability issues and the limited mass production capablilitiws of the Germans limited their effectiveness, which BF doesn't portray
True.. but they do have to make a fair game for some.. as if you was German in game.. you may have next to no advantage of getting in a tank, whereas the enemy would be battering you with tanks
Ye
It wouldn't be fun on a map set in late war and none of the German tanks work
And the planes can't take off cuz of no fur
Fuel*
true.. so on that front for a game.. would suck haha
spawns in plane.. can't take off
Ya
I think we're sorta judging the battlefield series unfairly with this entire accuracy schmick
Ye
Bf1942 was literally just researched from some old history textbook dice found from the library
It's been slightly more realistic then like cod or something
But it's never been that realistic
But in the end it's just a bunch of toy soldiers
Also some maps are just flat plains
bf1 servers down?
I think dice at the time just made a game with a ww2 skin
@topaz dome https://downdetector.com/status/ea
Real-time outages and problems for EA. Is online gaming down? Can't log in? Here you see what is going on.
People think about fh2 and project reality when they think of battlefield and that muddles the view a little
Bf1942 is just a ww2 themed playground, that's all
Stage v to bfv
need screenshot?
two soldier set tokens and mostly repeat skins I think
shame we can't carry bf1 warbonds over to bf5
why let the players have something fun when you can charge them for it?
is there any way to check my k/d in bf4? I know it's probably crap but I'd like to see.

Which confirms a currency or something called Set Tokens, I assume you use these to get any uniform set you'd like...
Also...
Annihilator Skin
inb4 set tokens are actually not that expensive or hard to get in the actual game
holy shit BAR has a skin?
Wait a sec, You have diffrent guns than me, I unlocked a Lewis and a G95 skin
Well, Atleast I got skins for guns I like.
Who else agrees with this monstrosity
Wait I can do the road to bfv thing at my own leisure before the game releases?
And I get weapon skins n shit

yolo
Does anyone know if you miss a certain R2BFV dog tag, if there'll be any chance to get it later?
The Fleur de Lis one
Stage 1 week 3, I missed it. Not a completionist, it'd just match my choice of front tag.
"grinding hard" 

Anyone got a milsim spetsnaz kit list for bf4
finally the africa selection is out in #220326362077069323 @wary mason
@languid forge They did a R2BF1 once and they had it available later on for a mission so Im sure R2BFV should have another in case you missed it.
I bless the rains down in Aaaaaaaaaaaa
Anyone here that can help me out with this particular queation? "I still dont quite understand the difference between recoil and accuracy. For example in the beta you could choose between better accuracy or less vertical recoil. What is the better choice here? I thought lesser recoil, because random spread is gone."
Recoil is how much your gun jumps when firing
^
@wary mason do you know if bf5 is gonna have custom/rentable servers at launch
already 1 person has picked the africa location
Accuracy is just how accurate the shots will be when fired off.
I'm looking forward to driving the Tiger I
I hear the drums echoing tonight~
@solid hinge what do you mean how accurate? In BFV where you aim is where your bullets will go right?
@rocky falcon 
Unfortunately i have no idea about that π But I sure hope for rentable servers on launch @stiff dune
Yeah @wide rain pretty much
Where is North Pole 
hess this server needs central america too
@wide rain Just gotta remember there is bullet drop. Like with Sniper rifles for example.
otherwise castro will be offended
@wary mason any info on hardcore settings ?
So what would be the better choice than lesser recoil or better accuracy @solid hinge
Either way is up to how you like to play. Would you rather have good accuracy and bad recoil or good recoil and pretty decent accuracy?
Thats really the question you should ask yourself when looking at the difference my friend. ^-^ It's also as to how you use those to your advantage.
topgunfigther
Yes T43r?
that movie was bad
Lolol
top gun
Meh I just chose this cause it had a decent ring to it when I played.
Thanks for the info.
No problem MugZitch.
any idea when you level up in the Beta release, all your unlocked weapons will carry forward into the actual game release?
Anyone want to play BF1 with me?
:nowhezee
I would do @prime ocean but currently stuck at work 
not as real life as fortnite
Drake sounds good
I like dabbing
Too
Are there women in ww2 ?
I like women and blood
They both make me horny

In case anyone has any questions about the Tokens in the Road To BFV challenges this week: https://www.battlefield.com/news/battlefield-5-stage-5-announcement
"As part of the weekly rewards, players can also earn two Battlefield V Soldier Tokens by playing Battlefield 1. These tokens can unlock two of eight Special Soldier Sets available in Battlefield V. These sets let you customize your British Special Air Service or German Airborne troops. For the remaining six sets, you can get one Soldier Token for pre-ordering Battlefield V and five for purchasing the Battlefield V Deluxe Edition. These tokens can unlock the remaining sets."
@wispy locust No actually the Beta is a development stage so anything you unlock in the beta stays in the beta. Now however if you are talking about a release trial before the actual game comes out like they did with BF1 then yeah you could keep unlocked guns, ranks, etc.
Premium pass and the other two faction dlcs are free again?
@upbeat flicker
blame the article
Again with the heckin MP28 and Selbaster skins?!
free premium again?
Also fuck I need to grind that paratrooper gear
Yes, but there's also Tokens for cosmetic stuff in BFV π
can everyone spam @upbeat flicker to buy origin access
If you read the article I posted above π
Anyone for Battlefield 3 co op?
need more Russian skins... π
@solid hinge Thank!
No problem.
ROFL i got kicked from Sec8 server. Different guy got kicked for saying dingdong.
I got kicked for saying that a dingdong was a hostess product
sometimes I join their servers just to get kicked for something absurd
that's life. I got banned from enaw servers for asking why their admin was threatening some players on the server. "Do not interfere with admins"
Jumping inw ith this random idea....
My idea if Battlefield V for example would re-introduce the Fedorov with a Russian DLC they should make a challange in Battlefield 1 to unlock it
that way both games would have life...
They should make various challanges in Battlefield 1 for Battlefield V when Battlefield V is out, like customization stuff....
Stuff thats a bit related with world war 1, like a Luger or Mauser skin or M1911 even...
Simmilar to what they are doing with the road to battlefield v challanges

I love pissing off the entire team as a tank and they all change to assaults to run at me with anti tank stuff
Defending the only point we have on operations and it was just wave after wave of the same 4 assaults
@icy sluice i am proud to say i am one of those people if you piss me off to much haha
@elder anchor Follow this link to know how to report: https://help.ea.com/uk/help/faq/report-players-for-cheating-abuse-and-harassment/
Please do not post a picture of a cheaters name again!
Thank you @noble current was new and didn't knew I'm not supposed to post screenshots like that. Won't happen again π
No problem 
we did it reddit
good
anything to cut vehicles down a bit
lame for tripwires
fucking hate AFK kills
during first days I saw like 20 next to each other. not sure what happened there
no ammo boxes nearby
Lol
like get in early? can i get it for just pre ordering base game or does it have to be delux?
I'm conflicted on whether to get BFV or FO76 first
you get to play like 4 ish days before normal version with deluxe
if you pay for premium access, you get to play on ninth day
idk what premium access is
its EA subscription
oh, nah i dont want that
i think i just want to buy base game, idc about getting in early
"ORIGIN ACCESS PREMIER"
i just started destiny 2 and i wanna try the new dlc
Jesus Panzer you seem like an ass
yea i just dont care to do that
if theres a free trial ill try it xD
other than that id rather just pay for the 1 game
ah theres nothing free in EA world
I bought the Deluxe version but will never pay monthly to EA, ever, for anything.
Not so sure if I'll buy BF V with the current reviews out there
what review?!
"reviews" there aren't any
The game has to be out for there to be a review
Unless there were critic releases or whatever
@frank kiln there are no officials reviews, those "reviews" are people opinions on a BETA
and imo, a lot of peoples opinions on the beta are pure trash
The game hasn't had its reviiew embargo yet
Mainstream gaming sites aren't allowed to publish the reviews yet
beta reviews Β¨
Theya re under NDA until the review embargo is lifted
Yeah. None of them are reviews
Just BETA impressions
And even then most of them are just putting in stupid things like "BF is dead" without giving like any other feedback and "WAMEN"
i honestly dont see how anyone says bfv is way worse than bf1, i played bf1 after bfv beta and enjoyed bfv much more
It's just all a buch of YouTube clickbait nonsense baleing BEAT impressions as "review"
Are we still doing π ± urrency?
yea, a lot of youtube videos talking about beta seem like a bunch of cucks pandering to the people whining about the drama around bfv
hardly anyone mentioned how the game played
because imo it feels fantastic
.. I wouldn't go as far as calling it fantastic
The game surely has its issue
But yeah, I agree that most of it is nonsense clickbait
It was a beta so there were some issues
Most of the garbageon YT is
And hey, for once, a beta is being used for fucking tweaking
Look at CoD, every time they have a beta, they look at NONE of the feedback pretty much
bugs aside, movement and gunplay were the best that bf have felt
i dont see how anyone can argue against that
True it's on the beta. I'm talking about the YouTube reviews but also it opinion based. I do tend to agree with some of the things that they point out though but let's see the official overall reaction when it's released next month
They were mostly rating the beta, not the full game itself
i didnt get to play the beta so i have no opinion on it
Makes sense yeah @icy sluice
Also, Joe's video was mostly cringe, it looked like he was just going on the bandwagon of hate because he got hate on for 'defending' the game's 'hate'
@agile leaf same here I'm just going on what others say. Wasn't around when the beta was open
I was playing when the beta was open
I didnt have xbox live gold when it was open
So i never got to play
Pity especially if you knew you might have been able to
Think they'll hit us with a black Friday discount on BFV? LOL
I dont understand the concept that it was open beta yet people without xbox live gold couldnt play...which is stupid in my opinion
That's not really fair. I on the other hand wasn't close to my PS4 or any for that matter
Am I the only one that thinks the beta was too unfinished?
Thats the point of the beta... @sleek tartan
Not really
Maybe an alpha, or an early access game from steam
Not a prerelease showcase beta
what do you mean by unfinished?
@frank kiln i believe the open beta not availible to everyone on xbox was more microsoft being money hungry then EA/Dice making that happen
Many absent features, many non working as intended features, many unexpected bugs, scarcity of new features that they wanted feedback on.
That is the definition of BETA @sleek tartan
Okay
i mean, yea its beta
Well, Fortnite, you need Xbox Gold
can someone play with me 3 rounds of scavanger
Even though the game is free
i need xbow unlock lol
the core gameplay functioned great, had some bugs, but nothing to complain about during a beta
@icy sluice as of recently xbox gold is not required to play multiplayer but its needed for BFV open beta apparently
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
@agile leaf that's very much believable
With how microsoft is displayed nowadays
hell previous launches of bf had more problems than the bfv beta
Really grateful I took the sony route
imo theres very little reason to get an xbox
just build a pc and you get 90% of the xbox games
can someone join i need 3 scavanger games for xbow unlock
PS+ costs money doesn't it?
Honestly,at this point i (and hopefully many others) feel bad that Xbox players without gold didnβt get to play the bfv open beta
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
I mean what's the point really?
Play a game for a week and that's it? Battlefield is mostly an Online game so...
You'll need PS+ or Gold to enjoy what most of the game is meant for.
I remember the good ole days when gold and ps+ wasn't neededπ
Now that consoles are the price of a mid/high end pc it makes me wonder what's the point is.
Hello there
General Kenobi!
Really grateful i took the pc route 
just donβt buy console lul
red dead π¦
yea...
that one hurts
im holding out
if they dont bring rdr2 to pc rockstar is dead to me
Since when could you turn the M1903 experimental into an infantry rifle?
this is gud

No I don't 
you will ilu π
Lol

not sure if that's a good or bad thing π
both at the same time
Hormi is one of the good ones 
Wonder how microtransactions are going to be implemented in Bf5
I reckon it will be pay to look good
^
@topaz atlas since like a month ago
But it always spawns you in with the crappy pistol bullets when you die
π‘
stomps in
clomps in
stomps all over an ammo box
wut?

π
@wary mason if I stomp, what you gonna do huh? 
You can't hurt me, I'm too powerful
π‘
They let people into the backline, don't deal with snipers
Just so frustrating
And then bail when we start losing
Why is bf1 better then cod ww2 need opinions
CoD has random recoil.
So, as a result, a high RoF weapon will sometimes be a lazer beam and sometimes you won't be able to hit a barn
An example would be the Thompson.
The chance of you hitting something 20m away from you with continuous fire is all up to randomness
just pre-ordered BFV!
Another example would be the M1 Harland
Thanks autocorrect...
Garand*
Sometimes you're able to easily 2 tap a target, other times your gun kicks up to the moon.
For the empire!!!
Got my first Syringe kill by complete accident
There was a sniper right on a downed teammate, I meant to revive the player, but killed the sniper
feels karma
Hi

Hello
Is there any zombie or survival mode in bf1?
Zombies in bf1 
I seen something on the web saying there was something like a survival mode... lol didnt think so
maybe the co op mode will have something like zombies but i highly doubt it
Zombies in bf1???
What if they're tortured shellshocked soldiers who are driven insane by the gas
Good idea
that would make more sense for "zombies" bf1 but at the same time it's so insensitive
such a thing would have happened irl
alot of half - dead soldiers probably spent an eternity rotting, half alive and insane on no mans land
So they're like "zombies"
there's a splitscreen mod for one of the bf games
It's probably PC only
I would love a zombies mod for bf1 / any bf frostbite game since project reality bf3 is a thing
After annihilating the enemy team it autobalanced me to their team, thankfully I was able to swap back because fuck that shit
Actually have like only 10 kills with it, I still prefer the Ribeyrolles or MP18 Trench
I use the Gasser over that
Do you have it
No, but I picked it up before and disliked it really.
You gotta learn to love it
It is tho
Cei Rigotti is a good starting gun for Medics
It's nice
I like alot of the semi - automatics / not really bolt actions and not really machine gun rifles for medic
they allow you to not spray and pray and sorta just make your shot
there's some skill in it
Which makes it very satisfying than just spraying with an automatico
Oh yeah, I can't say that
I saw that for a split second
Is anyone in the BFEE server?
It looks stupid to do all that weapon movements running around in Battlefield
More distracting and in the way than the Madsen MG
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
I'm on PC so I use alot of bolt actions
on console alot of players might use smgs because they're easier, right?
It's true I see more SMG on consoles
^
RSC Factory is ridiculously difficult to use but it's my favorite medic gun
^ that and the Selbaster.
RSC is great in close to med range
My Defensive Medic combo is that gun and the Mle 1903 to make up for the speed in case I'm in a pitch
One thing I find funny, once the peacekeeper was shown, I got killed with it... once
No one uses it
Gee, I wonder why.
Haven't used the Kar98k, too busy using the FG42, M30, Turner's and the Suomi
btw, Parabellum is still one of my favorite MGs in the game
2 fast
You cant ads so dw think the parabellum can still be better
JJ
Can you go to the BFEE server and use that bot command to that shows your BF1 stats?
No dunkin
Mount it like you would your favorite girl

Also dont like the fact u are only able to ads wheb using the bipod
Makes ot pointless as an agressive support
Y u bully me
It's not meant to be an aggressive weapon though
If you're able to ADS like that, you are a mountain of a man
Because u using the battlefield chat to ask me stuff from another server @topaz atlas
Heckin' Captain' 'Murica Super Serum to do that shit

I just dislike it, for me its a weapon I'll pass even though I like it.
So you can only ads while you have the bi-pod equipped and set up? for heavier MGs?
Yeah like MG42 and MG34
Interesting
Its for camping porpuses, if u wanna be an aggresive and push to capture flags u got use a 20 mag lmg
for an MG42, thats like 4 seconds of shooting
Sry not camping. Defensive
I mean barrel overheats so you cant just spray all the mag or as muchas u want
I can see people using it offensively
If anything, might need a Repetierpistole to rely on
Its not camping, its tactical waiting
lol, I can imagine like 2 people wathing C in Rotterdam in the highest level with fucking MG42s
A panzerfaust would get rid of them tho
@pseudo saffron Tactical waiting
π‘
You should be ashamed of yourself
#banFlexxster
Is there much bullet drop in bf1 that I need to worry about?
I HATE bullet drop
It's not that hard to deal with, just aim up off target a little
Velocity is my kicker, as leading moving targets can be hard if they've got the strafing down
True, I tend to use high clip weapons now though so I can quickly adapt my aim
I prefer to sniper, if close up I always run with support not assault.. I don't like the equipment for assault
Bullet penetration on today's blog. 
link?
Giving hormigaz headshots from outside 

Aw, now that I think about it
not to keen on the sliding around...
I like the idea of building things once a house as been knocked down
What do you guys think of BFV?

BF4>BF3>BC2>BF1>BFV
Pls serious answer
Okay, serious answer.
Battlefield V breaks with the latests examples of the franchise in various ways, seeking for a more hardcore and teamplay based experience.
It tries to achieve so through some forced dynamics, such as paper scissor rock balance to weapons, classes and vehicles and an attrition system that forces players to seek resupply in loops as opposed to a sustained encounter as before.
It has also raised the level of difficulty in use for the weapons with a few changes done to the gunplay, mainly being suppression beinh changed to a visual effect only and the substitution of spread for recoil and predictable patterns
On top of this, it has tried to evolve some dynamics present in the game that were lacking comparatively to top examples in the market, being one example movement.
Which has been expanded to allow for more player control and interactivity with the enviroment and his capability to make decisions that are variated
I feel BFV shows imagination and depth into a war that was so brutal and harsh. I feel as Dice have really tried to capture that as well as making it a fair online game for players. Vehicles are not too powerful or easily defeated. The gameplay from what I have seen looks similar to BF1 but with added enhancement's as they have mentioned in a previous blog. Over-all it's a game I cannot wait to get my hands on and see how the dynamics and mechanics of the game play out
A different way in which has broken with the previous titles is the customization of weapons and soldiers that now is locked behind a grind currency and level unlocking
Harsh unless you play support with the M30, in which case it's a literal blast when you airburst your own grenades next to people
gets a poggers from me dawg
the community support and release/s are great, doing the blog shows us what they are actually doing, which is a nice personal touch
chucking grenades back will come in handy..
presuming we have gas in bfv?
Other than that is just a battlefield
Don't think gas is a thing
should be.. wasn't it used in ww2?
You can expect fokin noobs not doing their job, cheaters, pro vehicle users, pro infantry users, and a bit (lot) of salt in the chat
Dunno, just it wasn't listed in the grenades they're adding last I checked
doesn't seem to be there still..
Gas was used in WWII, just not in combat.






