#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages Ā· Page 615 of 1
Jesus
I need a BF4 key
But they're $20 on Origin?!
Ias that standard edition or with all the DLC?
how often do you guys scrap skins in bf1?
why is the game so dead? i filter the servers to domination and sort by player count and the most populated server has only 2 people in
bf1 pc
but thats my favourite gamemode
i hate conquest because of the vehicles
someone always has the 80-1 score
and i also love playing medic
no its just domination one of the most fun gamemodes anyway
i remember playing it a lot on bo2 and every lobby u joined was full
hey its just one of those days
most days its 50/50 people playing domination or tdm
i saw rush servers, give that a try
i wanted to grind 40k points cuz of the event items

If I've missed a specific R2BFV dog tag, then I'm SOL unless it turns up in another week's awards right?

zlo?
That's a 3rd party client which definitely is not supported or given help to
ohi hess
Hi š
nice profile pic 
it's spookymonth
new weapon types being added through tides of war
interesting
what kind of types do you guys think could be added? Im thinking heavy sniper rifles with the Boys
yea it would be absolute bs if dice only added heavy snipers and ignored the rest of the classes
it will be a good mix
Well i wasnt saying it would be only heavy sniper rifles
Im just interested, because it seems like they have all the bases covered in terms of weapon types
and they should at launch
idk anything gun wise about the era so i dont really care what they add
id pref have a smaller gun base of balanced / varied guns
but i think most people want as much as possible
why not both
my main thing would be diverse guns that are balanced, balancing being the most important
@thorn wolf I hope the AT rifles aren't treated as heavy sniper rifles. They shouldn't be.
just off beta the medic class had 3 guns that worked basically exactly the same
ok,i see.
If they're going to add them, either make them proper AT weapons and give them to assaults, or make them a way for recons to have AT at the expense of not being able to put optics on them.
i agree
how much bf 1 in steam and origin????
bf1 not i steam
lol
origin was less than 10 dollars recently
i got the base game with all content for 9 bucks a monthish ago
I'd love to see AT rifles as a class of weapons added. Suppressed SMGs were teased in the original concept for archetypes, I'd like to see some form of suppressed weapons. Welrod pistol, De Lisle Carbine, etc.
Who is play in Arma 2 - 3????
sorry but i see that in batlfield group
Japanese and Russian weapons being added to the mix would be cool too. PPS-43, TT-33, Arisaka, Nambu LMG, etc.
@south lynx yea ??
AT rifles as a class would be cool. As a gadget it would be strange to see an assault lugging around a Boys as well as all his other gear. But then again the assault in BF1 did lug around the AT Rocket Gun 
Also, I want those stupid anti-tank pole mines the Japanese used. I don't care if they were nearly always lethal to the user.
ok
The assault in BFV is going to be lugging a PIAT, or a Panzershreck, or a brace of Panzerfausts anyways.
Lunge mines? oh jeez
So lugging an AT rifle isn't really going to be any more outlandish.
true
also is this what you were talking about?
Yep.
those would be fun to use against soldiers 
Really I just want to be able to knife tanks. And that's the closest I'm gonna get.

More vehicles to use plox
i want my M10 TD pls
More is gud
and Mustang
Like 12 or so on the field
Oh yeah, I really want them to replace the Valentine AA with the actual Crusader AA that existed.
Not a puny number of 6
Hamada is probably going to be tank focused
Valentine AA is a completely made-up vehicle, that 40mm Bofors turret was used on the Crusader.
M10? M18 for life.
it would be nice to see them change that to the Crusader AA
Hellcat, bestcat.
M10 is an earlier TD.

3" gun mounted on the running gear of an M3 Lee.
Hand-cranked turret.
M18 was a brand new running gear, much higher top speed, power traverse.
M10 was basically the same speed as a Sherman.
Just with a punchier gun.
Yeah id like to see the Hellcat in the game
M18 also used the 76mm, which was for all practical purposes nearly identical to the 3" in terms of ballistics, but redesigned to work better in the confines of a turret.
Assuming the US will probably get added, I'm hoping to see the M4(75), M4(105), and M4 Jumbo. Maybe if we're really lucky, the Croc or Calliope.
Calliope would be nutty
M4(76) would also be good I guess, but I'm a sucker for the stumpy guns.
There was an M4A3(75)HVSS model produced in small numbers that would be crazy fun to have.
Air-wise I want a P-47. Don't care if it's a razorback or a bubble canopy.
Also, totally want a Russian P-39
If they add Russia and we don't get the SU/ISU-152 I'll be sad.
looks like that might be a reinforcement
I think the Lightning would be a good attack plane for the 'Muricans
HEy GuyS!
yo
How are you ?
pretty good, weather is fucking beautiful finally so thats awesome
(i live in arizona, usually 100f + most of them time)
Lucky you.
At this page we will release new, old and unreleased screenshots, key art and more, from our current and past games.
āļølossless images
āļøno watermarks
āļøglorious 4k
So go replace that old desktop image right now, and show us the result! https://t.co/isfHpZss...
105
532
i wanna suicide charge with a hafthallodung
I wanna redeploy
They need to keep the Mosin rifle in bfV because the Soviets couldnāt afford shit
"Even if 1 bullet from the 1200RPM MG-42 does a measly 5 damage, you will still be dead in 1 second"
I really wonder how they are going to balance this
didnt devs want guns to have 333ms ttk?
stg has 300ms?
@solid hinge By not being able to move when you're actually able to hit anything lol
theres no way they are balancing guns by having them all have the same TTK
You have to remember that the more effective MMG players won't be watching large swaths of areas-- you make a firing cone that minimizes exposure to enemy snipers and focus in on a hot spot. You won't just be an OP map zone holder while prone if you leave yourself exposed, which most people will by climbing up on fortifications and ploppng over the highest point of sandbags haha
I mean what's the concern?
what was the word for one mg tactic
something in french
its like nest but on the side of a cover
no idea dude lol
its almost like this. you can only see mg just before the "cover"
ahh
found it @worn cave
"Enfilade and defilade"
Oh right, sure I've heard "in defilade" before
the protection of a position, vehicle, or troops against enemy observation or gunfire.```
not same damage model
well i guess they would have to make whatever adjustments to compensate right?
mg3 was pretty low damage gun at bc2
BC2 is really not relevant when discussing BFV as far as TTK and weapons at all lol
yes
other than yeah that gun had an insane ROF and ripped haha
one thing I can imagine already is having mmg set up next to enemy flag
or if youre having squad with you, set mg in corner of a flag
one thing I dont understand with tanks tho
they always turn towards you if you shoot at the with mg
What I don't get is when infantry fires small arms at vehicles in BF1 lol
"yes OK I will shoot you, fine"
š¤
maybe they saw it in company of heroes 2
I mean its good tactic
they always turn around
if tank is after support and not friendly assaults, thats a win in my book
I'm definitely going to put this on my list of things to try with my friends on release lol, I'll MG in front of the tank and you approach from the opposite side :V
add mg42 to that equation
spray tank optics with 50 rounds and triggering is guaranteed
I wonder if we can figure out where exactly that optic position is at
guess experimentation with friends on empty servers
would be inSANE if the armory/training map featured a free for all mode with party members lol
it'll be sufficient to just shoot a burst in front of them then pepper their sides
gun is at right side of gunners view
so aim at right side of the frontal turret plate
not sure where is the zoom
damn, was hoping the next stage of road to bfv would release today
tomorrow i'm going somewhere for the rest of the week
ripperino
RIP
Moderator link broken
^
Yes fixing
blame @rose pilot for that
"Ya done fucked it up"
nibbas how do you not pre test a link
test whatever
vote for me as moderator
i will not let such horrible mistakes happen under my rule.
shitpost about battlefield in #battlefield-legacy-titles
Question: will the pistols have upgrade paths? cause i'd like to see the C1911 and Po8Artillerie/carbine come back in a way
c1911?
the pilot 1911 with the extended magazine and folding stock
Needs more revolvers for high noons
Probably means that totally serial production 1911 that definitely wasn't a one-off modification.
Needs an Oberez.
Actually more revolvers not tied to a easter egg or any weapon for that matter
yea true
Harper's Ferry flintlock for Phantom program 2.0
i want my spumoni =[
Looking forward to rocking a Thompson with the drum mag.
thatll be fun
spumoni with drum mag
I've been told weapons like the M1 Garand will pop up roughly during a US update since its following chronological order. Worries me still that something famous will get ties behind a easter egg again.
Sorta but not 100% sure tho
maybe we'll get a hunting bow for an easter egg 
im still annoyed that medic isnāt getting good range weapons
the enemy frontline isnāt always in SMG distance
sometimes it can be 50 metres away or more
theyll have weapons other than SMGs
then Iām fucking useless
because all I have is an SMG
and I canāt both shoot at people and heal at the same time

unless enemies are getting all in our shit, which in that case I donāt have the time to enter revive animations
i have a small question if anyone knows the answer
i have battlefield V deluxe already
but if i wanted to play it on Nov 9th, would I need origin access Basic, or Premium?
cause origin access basic gives you a 10-hour trial, but I think that's only if you haven't already bought the game?
Nope, you get 10 hours from 9th period
But then you can play it when it releases after 10 hours is over
or get premier to play it right from the 9th
but i dont know when it ends or if it does
surely does but idk
huh
new mods? this mean new events on discord for bfv? š¤
i have got some work potentially on the 2nd so I should be able to afford premium then
Nope, just an influx of players due to the release in a month
cause i want to play it right when it first 'releases'
so i don't have to spend 6 days watching videos of gameplay, and just get to do it myself 
i love that medic is short range, has a lot of decisions to make, and imo puts them in a more likely situation of healing
same with attrition, limited stuff made most people hunker around supply drops, which were by obectives
yeah i liked attrition
i loved how many people were on obj
i did, but i used the suomi
about the origin access premium, if the service is unavailable in my region how can I do to play day 9?
i just wish they spawned us with the extra mag without increasing the max capacity
so i spewed 50 bullets in like 10 seconds
so like you start with three mags and three mags is still the total amount
woulda made more sense to me tbh
why isn't it available dedo?
ehh, i liked the system
star, IDK. Origin Access Basic is avalible, but the Premium version no...
yeah the system was fine before nypho
if medics donāt get any decent range options I will move to support
but since they changed it, i wish that's what they did instead
oh well
SMGs are still decent at long range
its decently usable
I was rekking with the Sten from atleast 30m away
compared to the laser beam experience I had with the Bren
reload and other speed upgrades went great with it
on south america we only have the option to pick the basic edition š¦
I hope they add the Owen Mk 1 and the Charlton Automatic Rifle
spumoni was the first medic gun that i just loed
because only the suomi had actual advantages over the STD 44 and LMGs
huh, that's weird dedo
it doesn't state whether it's basic or premium though, so it could just be premium
@merry ivy that could be it, i had a chance vs the stg
not at range though, but up close i did
the other SMGs felt as bleh as the MP18
what happens if you click here dedo https://www.origin.com/aus/en-us/store/origin-access
also the MP18 is great in BF1
i like the madsen
yeah but that isn't an assault weapon last time i checked
yes, so you get ammo forever instead
I redirected do brazilian store and I can see this
If i click on Join Origin Acess I have only the options of the last screenshot
I usually don't use Trench variants in the Support Class
i really hope they dont give bfv vehicles the power they have in bf1
I think this is not a bug, probably the Premium edition is not avaliabre (yet) on my region
maybe soonā¢
that page should list the benefits
and nypho, tbh vehicles should be pretty powerful
considering there aren't that many in most matches it should def make a difference
sure, but they feel oppressive in bf1
lol what
bf1 vehicles are too powerful imo
never really felt that
the mark V is really cool, I like how it has additional power but requires more teamwork to use
im a very good infantry player, and i could be doing so much work, but it doesnt mean jack shit vs a decent vehicle player
it was actually used a couple times in WW2, so i hope we see it somewhere
and yes, vehicles should be scary
it shouldnt take a single infantry person to take down a vehicle
vehicles should make infantry run away in terror
I just hope assaults cant solo ~75% of a tanks health like they can in BF1
yeah what you were saying yoshi
thats the problem, theres no rock paper scissors scenario, infantry is just at a disadvantage unless you get a few people to work together to take out a single vehicle
Also if they do Resistance DLCs wer could very well see Mark Vs and FT-17s again
like infantry beats planes, planes beat tanks, tanks beat infantry
everything just shits on infantry with little skill
ive seen a lot of videos where infantry players get in a vehicle and just cheese and decimate the game
infantry can fit into tighter spaces
thatās the only advantage
and its a pretty situational one
the rock paper scissors here
is tanks good against lone infantry
teams of infantry good against tanks
nobody thinks about calvary
oh this is BFV not BF1
in bf3 and bf4 vehicles were scary, but i didnt feel frustrated knowing one was near
ngl i wouldnt mind cavalry being back in BFV
imo thats the difference
yeah cavalry was cool
but obviously it should be accurate
like the Mark Vs
the soviets used exactly 4 Mark Vs in 1941
This game seems to be modeled after BF3 so hopefully thats the case
so I think they should be like a pre-spawned set of Mark Vs in that one specific battle if it's featured
I shit on heavy tanks with limited gun range as calvary
especially landships
poor things
the Battle of Berlin also featured a couple Mark Vs
in BF3 and 4 vehicles felt more common tho
Wink wink
Tanks feel rare in BF1
which is fair
so make vehicles common but less oppresive
Not in a good way either
they were rare in WW1
^
vehicles should definitely be oppressive in BFV
it's literally the point of vehicles
if it is, my time spent with bfv will be short spent
like its been said, bf3 and 4 did them different and it worked
I think the vehicles in BFV should be easy to play but hard to master, and atleast more common than in BF1
i dont think i ever complained about vehicles in those games
well guess what, they're from an entirely different time period
they shouldnt be oppresive and invincible
game enjoyment vs accuracy?
like spawning a vehicle should be able to significantly help your team push an objective
i remember when we were playing Breakthrough on narvik
I'd have the tank at one objective to help cover it, while we sent about 75% of the infantry for the other
also lmao what
most of the time when a team gets behemoths it's already too late
they lose anyway
nah
i had an enemy team get it when we were ahead by 150
cause of BF1s dumb Conquest system
it was like 550-700
for me they always get it like, right at the end of the round
nopes
when they're like 300 points behind
they got it early, and won by 50ish
i'm not denying it happened for you
the best is when an enemy team gets the behemoth when your team is about to win 
i'm telling you what happened to ME
I like seeing Enemy Behemoth right before Victory
cool sure
š
but stupid
like just seeing that giant dreadnought or airship
i mean they sorta worked for operations i suppose
never got to play, since everyone likes conquest
yep
i got the game after bfv beta
bfv beta is waaaaaaaay more enjoyable than bf1
i basically had no interest in battlefield before the controversey of bfv
id rather pay for beta than bf1
after that i saw gameplay and was like 'hey this is kinda cool'
and bf1 was $15 so i decided to buy it while waiting for bfv
right now i'm mostly playing infantry modes though
cause BF1 conquest is meh
If you've got no BF experience before BF1, I gotta say I don't really respect your views on vehicles much.
yea i got bf1 for 10 bucks with all dlc. just dont care for bf1
I like BF1 but im ready for BF5
took a long time just to enjoy it
The generally-acclaimed best game in the series was great specifically because vehicles could be soloed.
They were stupid powerful offensively, and if you were out of position with them you got fucked.
plenty of people who have played BF4 also don't want vehicles to be soloable
yeah but they were way more common
I had just finished fighting for The Great War and I am being drafted into World War II, FML!
3/4ths of the classes had the option to carry enough AV firepower to nuke a tank in one go.
sometimes it really do be that way
@south lynx ive played bf 3 and 4 before
when do we see Jack Foster in BFV
3 and 4 were insanely vehicle dominant.
ophi that doesn't sound like a good thing
I am dominant 
BC2 is generally held to be a high water mark.
BF4 was so dang clunky
i dont think they were a problem
having that much firepower on one person really does not sound like a good thing
because vehicles werent so rare
Assaults and recons had to get to point blank to use C4, but could solo tanks.
Engineers (Who had launchers) could two-shot a tank from the rear.
i've also heard a ton of stuff about BF4 weapons being OP with stuff like lock-on missiles and whatever
honestly BF4 doesn't sound as great as everyone makes it out to be
especially with the entire year where it just didn't work
another situation of rose-tinted glasses
Not really.
i've heard other people mention this too
that if we actually got a remastered BC2 that was exactly the same, everyone would hate it
I've played 'em all. BC2 did balance better than most.
because it isn't actually as great as people said it was
Only scrubs who didn't play since the beginning would hate it.
BC2 is widely remarked to be the best BF
no prone, controls like an oil tanker, unbalanced weapons etc.
Because your reference point is shit like BF1.
this is not MY reference point
Where vehicles are just fucking reaping engines.
i'm referring to other people who have said this
Shit like BF1.
someone who likely played BC2
ok have fun boys 
BC2 overall had a few flaws, mostly introduced by devs to counter whiners. But on the whole it was the most solid all-around game.
Map design was generally excellent, with a few exceptions. Vehicle balance was good. They were powerful but not sustainable without actual fucking teamwork. Class balance and weapon selection were both good, with gadgets going on kits in ways that both made sense, and encouraged teamwork and aggressive play.
Auto-repairing BS like in 3 and 4, or self-repair BS like in 1 wasn't a thing.
from what I read some of the gadgets were way too overpowered
You wanted to get health back, find someone with a goddamned drill.
and obviously console port meant it controlled terribly
as people have said, oil tanker simulator
Which gadgets were supposedly OP?
the problem is that this was an obscure youtube comment
i doubt i'm going to find it again
So you have no idea then.
i don't remember what video this was in
Why is exchange just legendary pistols and the French Two Tone?
You saw one person complaining.
i've seen several people mention that it wasn't what it was made out to be
and rose-tinted glasses is still a valid argument, you can even argue it for battlefield 4
because people treat battlefield 4 like it was perfect
even though it didn't even work for an entire year
Lmao
yet apparently it was great yet to many people bfv is terrible
so that's a classic case of rose-tinted glasses
@shrewd zinc So you have no experience with it at all, just hearsay.
And yet you're vigorously defending random detractors with no evidence.

That's stupid.
my point is that just because it's an 'old' game doesn't mean it's balance decisions were perfect and should be the benchmark
I didn't say perfect.
I said better.
A lot better.
Their approach to vehicles was good.
Their approach to classes and gadgets was good.
To you, the person who never played it.
i don't think a single soldier should have that much firepower
What fucking hypocrisy.
yes, i could probably play it and enjoy it
but that doesn't mean it's the best possible option
one of the things about battlefield is the team
But play it.
soloing a vehicle is not teamplay
Give it an honest fucking evaluation.
Instead of parroting other people.
I'm ragging on you because you're talking out your ass. You have no experience to base your analysis on. Literally the only thing you've said that I can actually honestly engage with is your personal opinion that you think nobody should have that sort of firepower.
To which I reply: So why should tankers?
Why should pilots?
that is a valid question
One soldier, massively more firepower than the rest of the team.
the mark V in BF1 (while bf1 isn't a good example), still actually required teamwork
cause you have a driver, but then you have teammates control the cannons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCS5pYkvJ7Q Teamwork amirite?
4-5 rockets destroy a tank, 1-2 rockets kill an infantry.
The Mark V was the worst tank.
if they actually made tanks work like this, requiring more teamwork, then perhaps it would improve it
The FT-17 support howitzer blows it out of the water.
Literally.
It three-shots all heavies.
yes, but i'm talking about the idea of the tank itself
independent of the game
the mark V requires teamwork to use
that should be a benchmark used for vehicles
Oh, yes in abstract I agree. Driver/gunner division would improve the game.
@shrewd zinc has a good point, a Mark V operated with teamwork outclasses a light tank any day
Ideally for a WWII tank, driver/gunner/hull gunner(radioman)/commander(top gunner)
@sterile dagger Not really. FT-17 support howitzer will kill it faster than it can kill the FT-17
yeah, if the driver instead got the front gun, and the second crew member got the main gun, that could definitely add more teamwork for tanks
although i doubt that's gonna happen
With the niche exception of a direct frontal engagement with a tank hunter that lands every shot from every gun.
@south lynx a squad support or tank hunter landship would certainly beat a light tank if both side guns are being operated
Nope.
I'm not talking about any other FT-17 variants but the howitzer.
Which, as I said, three-shots those tanks.
It also one-shot disables locations.
And it fires fast enough that it deals more relative health per second to them.
If you can get behind a howitzer it's fucked
But in terms of actual head-to-head engagement, the landships lose.
yes but squad support has the quick repair and tank hunter has the anti tank rifle in front
Squad Support doesn't out-repair an FT-17.
I've done that dance, it dies.
The AT rifle on the TH is enough to tip the balance if both side guns also hit.
But it's not enough if one misses even once.
So yes, a perfectly played TH will take two hits from the howitzer tank and just barely kill it in time.
i dont think the ft17 howitzer has the fire rate to keep up with a landship operating both cannons
But one miss and they die.
if the howitzer misses, its surely boned
Sure, against a TH.
Not against the others.
If you miss twice you're in trouble, but if you're engaging smart you just back to a hull down position and relocate.
It's almost like
yeah, and it's difficult to do that
The howitzer is supposed to be a anti tank weapon
i often find that Mark V drivers tend to sit in a position where one of the cannons is useless
That close up doesn't work to well
but if perfectly played, and you can spam both cannons, then maybe
Honestly the howie isn't bad at short ranges. It pivots fast enough that you have to get to hull contact range to out-turn it easily.
Man you really love arguing with everyone don't you about everything
It's more positioning-dependent than a non-casemate, sure, but it's still one of the most flexible, powerful solo vehicles in the game. TBH I think it's the most game-changing ground vehicle.
@toxic briar No, just with people who are wrong. š
Which seems to be everyone you talk to
Nah, just everyone I argue with.
i have the perfect picture for this hold on
If you link XKCD...
Lmao
Yeeaaaah. I freely admit that is me.
me too honestly
Anyhow, point is. BF1 already gives soldiers insane solo firepower. We just call them tankers and pilots.
If I buy an expansion pack on PS3 will it go to my PS4 in BF4
like i need to avoid looking at comments on BFV videos but nope, i do it every time
If your point is that no one soldier should be able to turn the tide of battle, then defensively weak vehicles are actually more in keeping with your philosophy than the terrifically durable ones in BF1.
true
if vehicles were more team-orientated, then that would be something very different of course
Can someone answer my question
though in my mind i tend to keep 'vehicles' and 'infantry' as two completely separate things

@shrewd zinc Well that's silly given that it's a combined arms game.
like i think 'infantry' should be strength in numbers, but not individually
cause that's how it is in reality right?
Hahaha, no.
vehicles are rare, but they provide opportunity
In my experience bf1 vehicles die stupid fast, compared to bf4 ones
I may be trying to use a mark 5 like a T-90 tho
the one issue with vehicles dying fast though
Vehicles provide mobility and firepower in open spaces. In urban environments, wooded environments, or marshy environments (Basically anywhere with short sight lines and/or compromised mobility) they're deathtraps.
is that it causes people to sit back and snipe with their vehicles
Ya
because they don't want their vehicle destroyed
and that can certainly be very annoying
But whenever I try to move up I die in like 3 seconds
Shaped charges are devastating to vehicles.
@sullen vigil The Mark V is a bad pick if you're not on comms with a coordinated squad.
Part of why I'm a proponent of the FT is that it's fully combat-capable solo, and its success rests on your skill, not the skill of whichever random idiots are in your sponsons.
Ya it's annoying to have either no one or randoms in your tank
yeah
@shrewd zinc Yeah people hanging back is annoying, but it's the lesser of two evils.
And typically the counter to that is map design.
and i definitely think it's fun to aggresively push with a vehicle
And once they hit a point of resistance, they dig in, fan out, and call for armor to take out the strongpoint.
without being mowed down by machine gun fire
Nobody had any idea what the fuck they were doing with WWI, to be blunt.
true lmao
They were writing the book as they went along.
but it certainly is quite fun to push with vehicles regardless
Well I don't mean infantry tactics.
like breaking a choke point and watch all the infantry run around you to the battle up ahead
Ye
Which were actually a lot more advanced than we give them credit for, at least by the latter portion of the war.
nice musk picture
Thanks
Though there were a lot of bloody lessons learned early on.
thatās when he was higher than the roadster
Armor though, that was a totally new field.
@shrewd zinc Yeah breaking chokepoints is how vehicles should function, but they should still be vulnerable if they extend beyond their infantry screen.
Well not completely. AT rifles worked fine through the mid-war period.
i mean if a tank pushes too far they will be surrounded by infantry
and at that point they should definitely be at a disadvantage
Heck, the Panther very nearly got a total redesign because its sides were so thin they could be penned by PTRD/PTRS fire.
And that was a late-war tank.
Ya
but if they are pushing alongside their team, a single enemy should not be able to sneak in and take them down
Hey, you take that back, the Pz. III was a reliable infantry tank...in 1940!
like i feel a tank should always try and stay near their teammates
it's like a mutual relationship
Oh ya a tank with some good engineers/support players is fucking terrifying
And good gunners
tanks help infantry move forward, infantry help ensure tank doesn't get destroyed
But that's a rare case
once a squadmate and I held down the entire enemy teamās tanks with calvary
Lmao
German tanks were pretty awful TBH. The Pz. III and IV were the best of a bad bunch, and they still had weak armor and were undergunned initially. Reliability never really got solved, they retained their poor ergonomics throughout the war, and even when they got upgunned, they were generally thin boxes with a competitive but not outstanding gun.
and it sorta already works like that
german tanks were bad and the german tank production was shit too
cause in bfv, if you aren't careful and you get stuck behind enemy lines, you get destroyed pretty damn fast
The tiger was pretty good if it worked
That's how it ought to be. TBH I'm looking forward to panzerfausting things when they have full locational damage in, rather than just the tracks like the beta.
I mean sure the Germans had the tiger and whatnot
Until the allies made better tank rounds
Ya
yeah
They tried to go for too high quality over quantity
i definitely think infantry should be able to take down tanks
sherman easy eights could easily take them down
The Tiger was a good gun and a lot of armor, but it had massivestrategic mobility issues that sometimes bled over into tactical mobility.
and they were reliable tanks
but not just because they were lucky, but because they worked as a team, or the tank did not work as a team
Where the US and Russian tanks like the Sherman and 34 were a good balance
sherman was a perfect blend of maneuverability, armour and gun
like yes while a tank technically is giving one soldier more power than the rest
it was a great tank
Ya
they still should need to use that power to help their team
The Tiger couldn't road march for example, it mostly had to go by rail, and the process for rail loading involved swapping the tracks out for narrow tracks in order to make it fit.
And could be modified for a number of things
meanwhile everyone says the sherman is bad becsause wehraboos only pay attention to big armour and big gun
Ya
what about that Sentinel tank though my guy
Upside-down tanks don't count. š
While in a statistical standpoint a tiger/panzer may beat a Sherman almost everytime, the Sherman's didn't break down every ten miles
true tank intellectuals know that the best tank is the bob semple
^
So...the Tsar Tank with an underslung gun then?
Ye
good target practice for sherman gunners
the A38 valiant is the best tank
japan in general paled in comparison to the US
cold fingers
@toxic briar Well that's really not true. Tiger would beat a Sherman 75 in a head-to-head engagement. Odds in a 76 or 17-pdr equipped tank were much more even. Pz. III and IV really depend on specific revision and are generally worse than even.
Ya
Once the US got better guns on the shermans they generally did better at fighting the German tanks
and also, german fuel reserves in 1944
Of course, you never encountered Shermans alone. They almost always had TDs lurking around somewhere, which really tilts things.
hahahahaha
imagine if they put the char 2c in bfv
Ya
it's funny how 6 of them got destroyed despite them never being used
they were being transported
Get your shit together
and got hit by germans i think
france was unprepared
cause they were mainly used as propaganda, like driving over trenches or whateve
they didnāt expect to have to attack
French armor was actually pretty good for the time, it was just employed terribly.
Ya
but never actually got to be used
the french military was not bad
They had all they tanks in all the wrong places
but their strategy
they'll probably still put it in BFV
i mean it was put in BF1 and it was much less relevant in WW1
if they invaded germany properly at the beginning of the war
like maybe they'll make the Char 2c slightly weaker than BF1
and make it a squad call-in for French
instead of literally only attacking once and then sitting in trenches
they should have pushed deep into germany before they had time to react
oh yeah i saw a picture of a WW2 battlefield that resembles passchendale
hope they add that to BFV
cause passchendaele just looks so cool
Ye
like Devastation will be similar but not the same
people joke about france
It'd make more sense for the char B1 to be the French Heavy tank
but the average french soldier and their equipment was not bad
it was their overall strategy however
that was complete dogshit
i wonder if we'll actually get a french faction
i hope we get a 'resistance' faction
Also are they going to have the secondary cannons be available in tanks
would give DICE a good avenue for customisation
āhon hon hon je suis do not attack germany hon honā
Cuz a fair few had like a smaller cannon on them
the char b1 levi?
And then the main turret
Ye
I am offensive and this is very french
i wonder if it would still have 3 gunner seats like in bf1
Probably
would fit an entire squad and one rando lmao
Itd be neat to have the exposed top gunner seats
gib mine flail tonks
in BF1 the secondary cannon was like, the 20mm autocannon thing
With the HMG on tanks that have it
how many top gunner seats did the Char B1 have?
a tank with a giant rotating thing and a bunch of metal chains
I mean for like the shermans and stuff
o
That had the 50 on top
well the tanks in BFV have the exposed gunner seats
my hands are so cold
i see no reason why the Sherman wouldn't
help
I've heard some less then PC names for the mine flail tanks
send me warmth
Lit
thank you elon blunt
it just might be an upgrade on the tree
I haven't seen much game play
cause in the beta all of the tanks with top gunner seats had them as one of the upgrades
i find it funny how the sturmtiger fits an entire squad, but the churchill crocodile doesn't for some reason
Hmm
it hink they should add the top gunner for the churchill crocodile tank, I think that would bring it to 4 people total
I just want the soviets to have the katysha
farquhar even has an adjustable wooden foregrip for maximum WW1 tacticool
The rocket truck thingy
there should also be a thing where when you order in a squad vehicle
have itlocked to just your squad for like 1 minute
and then anyone can take it if you don't use it
a farquhar would be really fun to own because nobody would have a fucking clue what the hell you brought to the range when they see it
and also, if anyone in your squad dies in it, they get like 30 seconds to respawn in it before randos can, or just allow you to lock it so only squad members can spawn in it
@shrewd zinc The top gunner was unlockable for a lot of tanks. I expect they're going to add call-ins to the company customization, so maybe we'll see top gunners in the future.
i still want a smokescreen as a call-in
and a regular arty strike
and white phosphorus of course
Day of Infamy-style
Ahh yes
WP as smoke?
Totally legal
don't think WP was banned in WW2
It wasn't, it predates the geneva conventions.
but i think WP was different to smoke when used as an arty strike
atleast in DOI it was
Actually I think it still is as they say they use it as smoke and if it kills someone that's not its intention
smoke didn't hurt anyone, WP burned them alive
there were also white phosphorus rockets for the Bazooka in DOI, and No 77 WP grenades
Dice has included the No 76 grenades, so I see no reason to not include the No 77s
@shrewd zinc Depends on which side and what shells you're talking about, but hexachloroethane was a common allied smoke compound. Not as nasty as WP, but still not great to be breathing.
Some German shells used oleum, which is really nasty stuff.
also i wish they had No 79 smoke grenades instead of M18 smoke grenades, which weren't actually available in grey colour during WW2
plus weren't used by the british, while no 79 was
Hmmm
when I say White Phosphorus Ophi, I mean as like a separate option to smoke
that costs more as a call-in, but burns an entire area basically
like burns any person standing inside the smoke
yeah
i bet that the prologue is gonna have the flute theme at the end
Lmao
I bet it's gonna be all morally sound aswell
And they're gonna learn some dumbass lesson
now that i've said flute theme i'm imagining the shitty titanic flute
i dunno, did that really happen in the BF1 campaigns?
like i dunno if the characters really learned a lesson in BF1
it was just people died, and there was really no reason
because that's war
Ya
tbh i tear up every time at the ending of avanti savoia
The tank one was good
@shrewd zinc I know what WP does, I was just discussing non-WP smoke compounds from the era.
i know a lot of people didn't really like it but i thought it was good
yeah, even if it is just monte grappa lol
i mean
day 3 AND 4 of through mud and blood are just Giant's Shadow
day 2 is like argonne forest kinda
day 1 is similar to St Quentins scar in a way
perhaps we'll see that with the german campaign
Something like that
or with the french one
I doubt it
french one sounds really interesting
i still wanna know what the prologue will be about tho
I want a Soviet campaign
i think we'll get that
i also want another australian campaign
i don't think any game ever has looked at the Kokoda Track Campaign
Ya
like a multiplayer level on that would be great
it has the potential for a beach landing map, an airport map, and a pure jungle map
I just hope it's not like the cod WW2 campaign
lmao
Which was a very stereotypical war movie type thing
Not even some random helmetless redshirt for pathos?
well the omaha beach scene was saving private ryan-esque
with everyone getting shot down
I didn't play it but watched parts of it, and it seemed kinda cliche in some bits
i mean that IS what happened
Ya that part seemed pretty good
but like, heck one of the main characters looks like one from saving private ryan
Ya
i've just watched several reviews of the campaign
and ThatHaddockBanker's video on it
which was hilarious
Me too
Its a terrible topic to talk about lately.
Like in cod WW2 it restarted your mission to the last load point if you shot an unarmed German
And then there's WaW were you regularly killed unarmed Germans as the Soviets
i'm glad DICE isn't portraying America in WW2 like most games do
that's a good start
Ya
but it should definitely show the brutality of war
Don't get me wrong I love america
surrendering enemies being shot down
But we've done some really shitty things
Like the scene from Saving Private Ryan where they got to the top of the cliffs, where were surrendering german solders that spoke ... hungarian i believe.
imagine including an interactive bombing of hiroshima
like you are actually a citizen standing there
They would never
Oh, it was Czech
I don't want them to do the whole speel about how we shouldn't have dropped the bombs, I doubt they will but it's possible for PC points
like the australian campaign i mentioned earlier, the first level could be a person living in Darwin before he enlists
I'd like to see a campaign where you play as a 442nd soldier and start out in the internment camps, get on the bus for basic (Hell, make that the tutorial maybe.) and then end up in the rescue of the lost battalion.
suffering through the bombing by the Japanese
A sort of mission that acted like the PBY mission in WaW would be nice.
Ya
and then coming back to see the city completely destroyed
I want a really shitty, gritty campaign
or the earlier B17 mission in CoD .... united offensive ?
and that's what causes him to enlist, and be sent to the kokoda track later in the year
The opening scene of WaW was great
It really let you know what kind of game it was
Ya know what would be neat
A Chinese campaign
The Chinese didn't do much in WW2 ?
They fought the Japanese slot
Alot*
That's were the earliest battle occurred
Before it actually started
Well that part i know specifically not much about.
For me that's Pre-ww2
Before Hitler even invaded Poland Japan was started shit
yeah, while dice wouldn't do a bombing of hiroshima, imagine the detail the frostbite engine could display
people being burned down to the bone, bodies turned into ash, your own character clothes being burnt into their skin
@mossy badge Look up the China-Burma-India theatre.
Or like the fire bombing of Tokyo mod stuff
just all the buildings collapsing around you
China was active through most of the war.
We just don't hear about it a lot
Brother, do you know what an Atomic bomb would do to a person ?
Hell, we even flew the Hump to help keep them resupplied with Japan cut their major supply lines.
You won't get burned to the bone, you'd be vaporised



