#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages ยท Page 464 of 1
I get that WW2 is different for the Battlefield franchise, but it's really all the same stuff over and over again
Same weapons
whatever the setting is
Yeah but that was like 12 years ago nobody cares anymore @gilded holly
indeed
The Kolibri should be in every BF game from now on
if its ww2 im just not gonna play sick of that setting.
BF1 BF1942 Bf1943 BF2 BF3 BF4 BF5 - from old to new
I can only imagine the DICE mods on the side of the chat laughing their arses of at our speculations
@solid hinge what era hasnt been done to death though
sick of what setting? a setting tht hasn't been done in 12 years
Battlefield: The First Gulf War
@gray glade Vietnam
BF1943 wasn't even a full game
We need Viet Nam
The modernization of the kolibri will be the zip 22
It was like a glorified standalone dlc
Hyped for bf juan
we got a vietnam game and a DLC already
All about the Mexican revolution
Call of Doody singlehandedly made everyone sick of WWII again
@gray glade None, but if it was set in the future there would be a lot more features
there were about 20 straight modern FPS games after COD4
and people want more of that?
how to make a vietnam game different from the last vietnam game tho=?
battlefield 1: version 2
god no
Battlefield: Kolibri
BF1 was shit
Only the Kolibri
BF1 is better than 4 with it's 5000 guns attachments lock-on spam
for 100$
So a newer version would be great
you got fucking snipers running around with carbines and shotguns
great game design
hardline 2
It is
no
How do I use the bar while being able to control the recoil
like 1 weapon was but dice gave up
tapfire
BF4 balance was okay, ARs were ridiculous though
hipfire was good up close in all battlefields and bette
i just really don't understand the push for a modern game, but hey you might get it
What automatic has the least amount of recoil
pulling down for recoil and burst fire for accuracy
and i'll buy it
i always do
BF1 really made an effort to define the classes and make them fit a role and engagement distance and
Ww2 would just be awesome
Will premium pass be in bf5?
i liked it but a lot of people didn't
so that is one thing they pretty much confirmed ithink
I need Normandy with frosbite
prob the new one
premium pass would be fine
no
Guarantee there will be premium
premium friends
please stop typing
Why would they abandon it
Drugs could mean anything is really generic
cause dlcs for money fcking suck
The syringe in BF1 counts as a drug
@pulsar valve nope, no esbr rating for drugs for bf1
Battlefield morphine
what can you spend real money on in rainbow 6?
morphinefield @lofty valley
I mean
Lol but Siege doesn't get anywhere near as much content as a single BF game does over the span of its lifetime
DICE atleast tried to bridge the gap between premium <-> non premium members
BF games also aren't built to last 4 years
finally new battlefield
Does battlefront count as a battlefield game
kinda false seige has plenty of content
No
Here comes Wake Island ๐
Lol compared BF?
Do you think it'll be modern?
Modern would be sweet
the community is split for older war and modern
splits everyone
To par off against bf1
I loved BF1, but i don't want another older themed game
they want to make sure they get their money anyways, so if they dump the DLC idea, they will go all out on the customization thing
It's true it's very decisive subject.
M16 napalm music. Vietnam
battlefront II is pretty fun i just bought it, don't understand the hate
better anticheat ok
ill be ok with what ever they come out with really. As long as its not Arcady or too noob friendly
Variants system was the best thing to ever happen to bf
just give me that laser bipoded M1917 carbine with sniper scope
I'd like to see more kits again. More gear and equipment
oh god no variants were a fck up
yeah more kits equals no class balance
Commander mode would be nice
Would it be worth it to grind BF4 since V is coming up?
bf4 had no class balance
@glossy locust wprd
Guess not 
No bully, but decent PC boi can bypass punkbuster and fairfight logic on bf4
Bf4 is lit
Yes
Battle royale field is gonna be super lit
not only unlocking weapons, but also individually unlocking attachments for your weapons
bf1 had a terrible hacking problem for al ong time too but i would never buy a battlefield game not on PC
BF4 progression was good but stop the level caps
done
one thing I was a little sad to see
was 50 class ranks
but its a pointless grind since we don't get anything out of it
people in this community seem to care more about attachments then game balance and i don't understand why
its easy
it's literally the main complaint against bf1 is the lack of "weapon variety" and "progression system"
Bf2 was super hard to level up so your higher ranks were actually only the players who had played the most or with the highest s/pm
Bf1 has the worst progression of all time

progression was lackluster
You could boost ur level on glitched server which get you 1kill-10000kills and so on, game is already broken by cheaters, just look up top leadboards
counterstrike literally has two fucking guns and it's the most popular shooter on the pc
3 guns
you could unlock all weapons (if you own the base game)
why do you need a million guns
@glossy locust that's why a modern theme to par off against bf1 would be preferable
balance and gameplay are king and it's much harder to balance a game with so many guns and attachments
clearly you need to play those games to understand
but even with my complaints, I still enjoyed battlefield 1
More gear thou would be awesome
even in bf1 there are certain guns that are just so bad like i appreciate it's in the game but what is the point of them
the RSC SMg
is awful
I'd like to see a deeper Medic system
for instance
Sorry to interrupt but.... Just a quick thing: I got bored and started digging around in the reveal page's source code thing and noticed that there were several mentions of the phrase "Casablanca", now as some history buffs may know, this refers to the Casablanca conference, which was a major event in the planning of WW2 in 1943-onward, however it could alternatively be just referring to a text font style, but who knows? Also mention of the phrase "hero", perhaps it might be a reveal of a battle Royale, similar in design to BF:Heroes?
Can't wait to see what looting will be like
RSC's decent. Just can't fire in quick succession
I actually really liked the ''nearby medics'' tooltip they added
hope they'll add it
I thought bf1 was great. It was breath of fresh air after nearly 6 modern titles in a row
@light coral agreed
@light coral yup. Got a point.
taking ammo mechanic from hardline was prob the only good thing about the game
or dont even take ammo
Any way to make the arrows on the minimap larger? They blend well with the blue background and are so hard to find on a large monitor with a large res
More squad interaction tools
no afflictions
I mean let's be real, other than modern attachments and vehicles bf1 wasn't a ww1 game. Everyone ran around spraying hellriegel and bar lol. It was a modern game with a ww1 skin on it
The ability to set markers on the map and plan a unilateral strategy instead of working in separate none communities squads
@leaden saddle i dont get it, where is the casablanca reference?
Super human speed agility
If it was a true ww1 game it'd have been BA and slr
infy would be boring on large maps
They need to build on operations campaigns
Sitting in a ditch for 24 hours before shooting
I like the role play element
@gray glade - it's in the source code- right click and inspect element and it's not too far down
I've accepted era is just a skin, because of that just give me the best shit to kill people with
Nukes and BR mode
Let's go
Well imo it's more about the aesthetic and authentic part of the setting, rather than trying to adhere to the reality of the setting
Indeed
I understand they have to make it as appealable to as wider of the community as possible
You don't see aks and helicopters, it's all weapons and equipment that existed at the time of or before the war
@leaden saddle right click on the image or on the page?
Verdun is actually horrendous it gives me nightmares
cant find any casablanca on the source code for the pic ๐
Attacking on operations ๐ข
Give me an AK47 and my little pony skins please
Hmmm mmmm
All I ask dice
#DICEPlease
^
Here it is: @gray glade
customizable soldiers???
Pink soldiers?
Woke!!
need more troll equipment
that says battlefield-5 too tho
Fast Ropes
The battlefield will never be the same, cause BR mode only.. w00t
battlefield 5 indicates a modern one
@gray glade they could be revealing both?
We've been begging for fast roping for 15 years
They almost added it as a feature in bf2 but it was removed last minute
Before release
I mean it doesn't indicate anything, they can call it battlefield 27 if they want
battlefield 1337
Their will no doubt be a subliminal meaning
5
is V
in roman numerals
therefore
it must be set in the Roman Empire
where its like
Roman Empire vs The Pope
Yes please
Also just gonna say this, battlefield franchise needs to do away with campaign, they are always ass
hmm, tagged? ๐ค
I liked the war stories
kinda of fun fact roman numbers were used in Europe till 15th century
someone tagged you a while ago
I have internet, why would I play offline?
If Battlefield v is the confirmed title than itโs obvious that battlefield v will be open world because gta 5 is also called gta 5
True
V for gta 5
V for Venereal Disease
I would seriously fuck with a game that took melee combat seriously
For honor is kinda cool i guess
@gray glade Don't forget the fact that there were in reality 5 major powers during ww2, British Commonwealth, USSR, USA, Germany & Japan...
@high hinge well its been 2 years
two years this fall for BF1
@leaden saddle and italian fascists
I'm telling you right now it's going to be modern, they saw how much it paid off last time to switch time periods
@severe pier at least until 1943- at which point they sort of had some "issues" with civil wars...
half the player base wants WW2 and the rest want modern or vietnam
EA messed up - the WW2 game should be 1944 rather than V
Yeah
Yeaaaaaah
if they named it 1944 what would there be to reveal?
RIP Fortnite

Well they didn't reveal the name of BF1 til the reveal trailer
battlefield 1 fucking banked big time on this hype train
@severe pier they might not wanna confuse it with batallation 1944
Battlefield V (Veitnam)
they didn't reveal a name until it was officially revealed last time
makes me think it's probably
and unfortunately modern

I want the game to be like battlefield 4
why not enough games with modern scopes and machine guns for you already?
Populated asf
I'm sure once V comes out bf4 will be more popular than bf1
Because bf1 is played the most cuz it's latest
GG DAn Mitre just confirmed its V for BF5
Confirmed the V doesn't stand for anything else
I mean that doesn't mean anything in of itself
who is dan mitre?
Global Community Manager
@MDMcCullough @DANNYonPC @Battlefield Itโs Battlefield V as in โfiveโ.
so it could be any period then
Yes
why not?
WW2 is just rumored
DICE themselves said BF1 was almost called BF5 but they decided to change numbers because it made no sense
Go play 1942 ww2 fans
what does the name have to do with anything
It's number logic
@glossy locust battlefield 1 got to do with ww1
it could literally be in any time period
they named the ww1 game battlefield 1 simply because they didnt have a title named Battlefield 1 yet
afaik
And also because it made number sense lol
But they had swbf2 in the past???
we desperately need an actual modern good WW2 game that's not made by COD recycled trash kids
maybe next battlefield after this one will be battlefield 6 and set in vietnam and they just wanna simplify their naming system
Also why do people want a WW2 game
we haven't had one forever
Why do we seriously want a WW2 game please give me a reason
Yeah
Because gameplay-wise we just played one for two years
because WW2 is awesome
@stuck jewel because we havent gotten a ww2 battlefield with the kind of technology we have now
battles based on real life in the frostbite engine
Umm we have
Go play 1942
thats a terrible argument @severe pier
BF1 may be set during WW1 but the gameplay is literally all automatic weapons
lol you can use that logic for basically every setting
it's not even playable by modern standards
Ikr
I just don't see DICE making a WW2 game right after BF1
the gunplay is bloody horrible for that game
It makes zero sense
i don't see them making a ww2 game either
bf1942 cannot possibly be compare to the more recent battlefields
but it's what i want
and about half of the playerbase wants
so
it would sell like hotcakes either way
Bf2 was the best battlefeld ever, I really miss it๐
I dunno I kinda want a 2142 prequel and this may be it
Umm we got 1943 lol like 9 years ago
Ugggghhh please no ww2
1943 wasn't a full game
Yeah 9 years ago, a fucking long time ago
It was a glorified standalone dlc
Yes I did
1943 was great
Ok good
i havent seen any other game that does war like battlefield games do regardless of time period, and imo a battlefield ww2 would be unlike anything else we have seen gameplay wise
It wasn't a full game
We do not need a WW2 game after BF1
Hell, it was digital only
It will get stale quick
@stuck jewel then no modern game either i suppose
and what is going to be so awesome about another modern battlefield @stuck jewel ? We had BC1, BC2, BF3, Bf4, BfH
all modern
Any ideas what 5 period / war will be ?
Oh do you want a fuckin roman battlefield?
what time period would you want then @stuck jewel ?
There is allready a vietnam one
i mean space shit is awful man
ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
@glossy locust space shit?
vietnam i would be fine with
2042 would basically be a prequel to 2142
2145 was played by about 1 person on this entire thread
2142 wasn't set in space you bastards
If it's space shit i am going to uninstall all my bfs and never play them again
i wouldnt want any battlefield games previous to ww1 myself
and it would only be set 15 years after BF4
lol so a modern title
Not really
I'll be happy as long as it's not futuristic
2040's is near future
yeah, any game set within 20 years from now on will be very close to bf4
ok so like a couple prototype vehicles and mostly modern weapons
That was BF4 lol
I hope it's like bf3 but better graphics more vehicles more custmizables and so on
We need mooooore
bf4 had literally all the customiizables you could ever have in a game
and it ruined gun balance
unless dice decides to make it a "what if" scenerio with really weird technology
But it's going to be old something
Look I'm not gonna argue but here is my point, a WW2 BF will not be much more different than BF1
Yes
I would like a ballistic shield, sit in a corner, and be camouflaged ๐
Although now its been said to have big change in this game
We just need something like bf2
It's going to be old because they gave us the horse painting
The only way a WW2 BF will be different is if yea DICE did a "what if" scenario
SO if it is WWII whos to say things won't change
@stuck jewel it depends on how they set it up tho
and so what BF1 is a good game, at least it's different from the past 6 entries
Horse riding ? Might be the OTTOMANS.
@fair salmon
any battlefield game will have similarities to previous ones here and there
The Ottomans are in bf1 XD
@glossy locust bf1 is good but it's rather cod than bf
Production wise it would make lot of sense to do ww2, but theme... mmyeah, ww1 vs ww2 not enough variety
Theres no ottomans
yeah well that's because of you all
@icy crane yea ik...
I mean BF1 has automatic weapons, an absurd amount of vehicles, and planes everywhere. WW2 has all of the above :/
I hope it will be worth to buy
Lol but so does every other BF game
Because
BF1 was still authentic to ww1
Ww2. Tiger/Sherman tanks. Or the t43.
BFH was "different"
headdesk intensifies
And it was scheet
bf1 sold the most by FAR by FAR
And there are things in ww2 you'd never see in BF1
why would they change how it plays
BF1 was not authentic lol
Please, go on
Battlefield becomes easier and easier
I don't care for the setting
into what? bf1 plays great
I don't see how bf1 wasn't authentic to the ww1 time period
Just don't give me BF1.5
dice made some very needed changes to guns and technology to make a ww1 setting work tho
they had to
Bf1 guns look like shit
Uhhh what
i like how people say BF1 is all automatics when about 80% of people play scout
like what game are you playing?
If they add Microtransactions like star wars. Then you know what battlefield.... you are Screwed.
and premium is better? have maps like in bf1
If they stick to how they did it in BF1, itll be fine
I think premium is better
Not with 6 month gaps
DICE pls no premium
Premium is in the past now, its dated
it really splits the community, lock guns skins whatever you want
but don't lock maps
well obviously dice had to use all these automatics for bf1
And I guarantee it's shit
so, Battlefield 5 will not have oremium?
it wouldnt have been fun otherwise
premium*
We got that with BF1 any lol, took them 6 months for a single DLC
V*
i don't think so I think if they locked guns behind a dlc season pass people would still buy
and they print money with every battlefield release
like what do they even need
How about the maps costs $2 (Aus) . Guns for free... i mean games are already 100$ in australia.
why do they need premium?
Lol 6 months for 1 dlc, not all of them, and they added 4 maps or more on top of weapons, vehicles, etc
We see what we get when DICE goes free dlc
Look at swbf2
The DLC is a joke
yeah look at CSGO they redo maps all the time
seige has new maps and operators
but swbf2 there arent enough comunity
Csgo is boring repetitive shit
Rainbow 6 seige is succeeding by adding free content.
lol csgo is boring get the fuck out
Yeah, but it's been out longer than bf1 and has nearly half the maps
the lootboxes kill swbf2
You can't even aim down the sights in csgo... Man it's 2018
like you can say you suck at it and you've played it to much but to call probably the most balanced and longest lasting shooting in the world boring
like that's blasphemy
That's not to mention a ton of sieges dlc maps were garbage
And are complained about constantly
maybe dice will go down the path that almighty daq said though, with the customization and all, that could bring in a bit of money tbh
bfv is WW2
Weโll see
multiplayer DLC is dead
Also, they should have named it Bf 1944
nobody buys that shit
@light coral it still brings the players back for around a month/ if they like it more...
they literally make the community suffer for a few that buy it
battlefield had more people buy it than most too
Bf1 turning tides = swimming simulator
and you STILL have issues finding games
I have no problem finding dlc matches...
Sorry guys im not gana call it BF five.... ill keep calling it BF vee.
i hope the weapons system changed in this new battlefield
what was the value for premium there?
i do not like the bf1 weapon system
lol I played a hardcore server running every dlc on bf4 just last week.
esepcially since the water maps were the best in the game and impossible to find games for
a part of bf1 weapon system being so simple is probably because of the time period, there really wasnt much back then, ww2 should have alot more
hardcored is for trash muh realism snipers
Lmao, what does that have to do with anything
hardcore is for nerds
yeah im sure there are full dlc servers that are occasionally populated
๐
but it's not common
And yeah BF1s choices were lacking, but so were full auto choices back then. It was really a time of evolution for firearms
i want that you can modify the weapon
most of the autos in the game weren't actually prevanlant
but they DID exist
so gotta admire DICE making it work
lol if I can find a server running all dlc on hardcore, I'm sure I can find multiple normal servers running them
a lot of the autos weren't even made or used until like the end or a little after the war
@glossy locust i think that was out of pure necessity tbh, a game with weapons only produced at the time would've been a boring game, pure bolt actions, shotguns and overpowered machine guns
so what is your point, you want them to keep the premium?
no
McBeef does
in BF1, the current battlefield, you can't find games playing ALL DLC outside of a few servers
bc the DLCs of swbf2 was garbage
and they usually have waitlists
forget about finding a server that is running a specific DLC
I do want them to keep premium
i have only the first DLCs and there are like only 25 servers everytime
It's a good system that guarantees dlc and usually results in Battlefield games getting more dlc than other games, and more frequently
almost 10 with 300ms so i cant play sometimes
it would help knowing how much money the dlcs/premium system made EA though
but when you click "join conquest" you are put into an empty DLC map about 99% of the time
Almost every game that has free dlc release them sparsely and it's usually like a single map
because only like 4 servers run them
yeah sure
I use the server browser and find a server running dlc I want
also, who knows how much the lootbox ban thingy will spread from belgium
ok, but there are only like 4 with acceptable ping
don't lie i just played the other night
Lol what platform are you on?
PC
also the matchmaking and group system is so bad since battlefront
never said there weren't people playing
there aren't enough servers
all the good ones have a 10+ waitlist
Free dlc imo isn't worth it
i just did it the other night, if you want a low ping all DLC server
you have to wait to play
it's that simple
Paid dlc has always been the higher quality and more worthwhile dlc
it's simply not true seige man
And I play on Xbone, plenty of servers to choose from
which is like the 3rd most popular esport shooter
yeah they have shit maps
but so does battlefield
Dude, Siege has been out since 2015 and has 18 maps total
about half the maps they release are bad
BF came out late 2016 and has 30
yeah and half are bad
In your opinion.
giant's shadow half-assed garbage
V = Vietnam confirmed
Do you want giants shadow to be every BF dlc map ever released from now on?
ok let's see the map with the C base and the tunnel underneath
i think it's in apocolypse?
it's so bad
paschendeale is also pretty bad but that one is ok
it is especially if you know the history
just not much cover
it's probably the most brutal battle of all time
i understab you @glossy locust but you have to think the game is WW, is difficult to adapt to a videogame and i think DICE did an amazing work
understand*
i actually praised them for it
all the guns in the game actually existed in the era
not in the actual battles but they existed
and they added variety
while staying somewhat true to the period
"i understab you" ๐ก
only if you wont be able to play black women with big noses on the german side
and there is an infantry MG42
because thats about the best thing in the history of ever
๐ป
so BF1 was pretty much universal praise
and still ahd some haters
i mean the announcement
I'm really excited about a supposed return to ww2 the title less so๐
At least it's proper though not like cod: IIIII
we've had modern bfs for like 3 staright titles time for a break imo
Bc2, bf3, bf4
I don't want ww2 I want an AK47 gimmie now
Hardline
Exactly โ
Tonightโs podcast info https://www.facebook.com/rideforlife3/posts/1967954343216884
do you think DICE will release another battlefront game in 2019?
I doubt it
me too
They are stretched thin as is
I dont think so
sorry ๐ฆ
There's gonna be SW games but not battlefront

There's supposed to be a rpgeque one developed by bioware
of course
Sure
they already used battlefield 1, 2, 3 ,4, so next in line would be 5, but they dont wanna trick anyone its a modern game, like 2, 3, 4, so they call it V (5)
because ww2 etc
Most likely yes
if it had been modern i reckon they would've called it battlefield 5
But I think a reboot of the franchise would have been acceptable
Which was my understanding why the called bf1 one
yeahยจ
LMAO, BO4 reveal is tomorrow, cant wait for BFV trailer to shit on them.
I mean right on their Twitter it says 17+ with drug use
Germans used amphetamines during war
yeah, all armies used drugs
but we can call medicines like drugs
ww2 fits in with the white horse as well
or painkillers
Oxy was used because morphine was in short supply
i linked this before way back: but my theory of the white horse pic in the secret room:
https://www.express.co.uk/news/history/697218/Mission-rescue-Hitlers-equine-master-race
so maybe the evolution with operations is that the objectives isnt just flags to take, but actual objectives
There settings I hope for the next battlefield that Is modern or ww2
Honestly I'd be fine with either but I'd prefer ww2
me too
I prefer ww2 as well
I would be fine with WW2
Vietnam would be good for modernish
Dice loves blue
I would like to see one day the korean war
Oh shit
Ever play bf3 blue filter everwhere
Where did you found that
Hiw about if its about the medieval?!!๐
It doesn't look as a ww2 soldier
Or civil war america
looks like a british ww2 helmet
White horse is oftenly used in metal gear solid prequels starting from third, through peace walker and metal gear solid V haha
hope they crown the true hero of the ww2, the Soviet Union
I think it may be a british WW2 helmet
maybe is japanese helmet

You honestly cant have WW2 without soviets
yep
World of tanks 
Australia...
@marble oriole could be fun with china vs japan
Yes
Spain ๐ค
But
that was a real nasty war too

Some thing they could explore is the spanish civil war
But we'll see

spain did not take part of WW2 because the civil war
Wtf I thought dis gta ๐น

Why is battlefield A V now ?
but Franco support Nazis
Oof
supported*
What's with obsession over roman numerals at number 5 these days
@exotic matrix oh im soo stupid... how can i never thought of that?
it was close to WW2 (1936-1939)
Wuh ?
Battlefield 1 was originally going to be called Battlefield V
so BFV is WW2
Its the same artwork as BF1
we cant be 100% sure, but it looks like it
the image background looks like Pacific Ocean
if its WW2 the campaign better offer a germam perspective
pls
That would be nice
Normandy on Frostbite Engine?
๐ฉ ๐
or axis in general, i'd be pissed if it was just allies
i wonder if they have the guts to do that
i dont think itll happen sadly
having an axis perspective might by some tards be considered "not PC" and thus start an unnecessary shitstorm from SJWs
what a hype to do headshots with the springfield ๐
The Soviet campaign is going to be a female soldier lul
what a hype to mow down shitters with an MG42
i think they are gonna focus on the major countries to make sure they dont waste voice over budget tbh
SJWs are retarded
I mean
I know the swastika is going to be replaced with the iron cross
I cannot agree with having an Axis perspective that twists it to them being good or decent people
Because no one in that war was good or decent
๐ค
Can it be May 23 already
when is bf5 being released
A lot supposed to be loyal to Hitler tried to kill him
Hitler: a vegetarian who got his nut shot off in WW1 and killed a few million people.
^
BF5 is being released later this year
It was called BF2018 for a while because we didn't know what it was called.
October
october
Like every other BF game
I got into the Alpha test last time, it came the first week in July
this one is released November 1st, just to break tradition
if you check interviews with the common german soldier in ww2, its not like they were all nazis
so if dice wanted, they could for sure make a point of view from some of them but does dice want to?
I'm not having this argument here
dont mistake SS soldiers for a common ppl
They're just following orders
Its been done too many times
Like every other soldier
every single major country in ww2 are guilty of war crimes
every single one
but i dont think dice wants to bother with focusing on germany or italy tbh
to avoid discussion
No doubt DICE will heavily research and seen the help of experts during the development. They set the bar high with the historical content in Battlefield 1
Italy is just flexing and showing off
#DICEPlease Keep Codexes
that german mini series about ww2 was very good, and done in a tasteful way
"unsere mรผtter unsere vรคter" if i remember correctly
Chronological DLC starting with 1939 though to 45
That would be cool
I just want to fly Spitfires
Korea would be interesting
Vietnam would make me very happy
Spitfires? Hell yeah
The Korean War consist of WW2 weapons right?
A little bit, I think
i wonder about korea though, it might interest americans but europeans really arent interested in it
its also quite limited in scope
korean war will never happen```
"1. A New Battlefieldโฆ
Itโs a brand-new experience and still everything you love about Battlefield โ where every fight is different and brought to life across unexpected theatres of war."
I'm telling you, DICE
unexpected theatreS
Emu War
My chemical romance vs 30 seconds to Mars
Australia went to war with a species of bird
Damn
And then proceeded to lose said war
Yeah
Wanna hear a joke?
Cod.
^
since dice mention different theatres, i reckon vietnam and korea is out of the question
Emu War had several theatres
Yeah your probably right
Mostly movie theatres
BATTLEFIELD 1776
But theres already a vietnam....
One sec
Years old thou
Lol
BF1942 had UBOATS, destroyers, aircraft carriers. All drivable and brimming with weapons. Id like to see that feature reintroduced
BF2142 had Titan Mode which has been #battlefield-legacy-titless best game mode in my opinion
If you want to see commander mode return I started up a topic on the BF forums
Cod is now panicking... i bet they just wanna stop developing bo4
whos excited for the BFV to come out
hell yeah
stupid question did Normandy Beach ever have tank combat
why would they even deviate though? Bf1 was their best selling battlefield ever
and i don't even know what people talk about the "staying power" of it the player count is fine and will be fine for a long time
if the leaks are anything to go by, they may be returning to the old spread models of BF3/4
touting tighter gunplay and all
you mean the laser guns
First shot spread multiplier was a source of a lotta complaints
a lot of good shooters like CSGO have some spread variation
and yes it is RNG depending on the distance
it's a way to force engagements for different guns
imo they can just tune what they had in BF3/4. No need to introduce complex mechanics like first shot spread multiplier
having slow spread decrease alone can work to prevent laser guns
I don't think the guns in bf1 handle poorly
like yeah you can't snipe with an smg
but why would you try that?
imo they don't either but it leaves more to be desired
smgs are bad at mid-range in bf1 and i think people don't like not being able to hit targets at that distance
sniping with an SMG can be balanced by damage falloff or really slow recoil reset
in fact recoil-based inaccuracy feels a lot more intuitive than spread-based inaccuracy, but unfortunately it's hard for console controls to deal with those mechanics
so we gotta have some way to tune spread
marbleduck did a lot of videos on this very subject back when bf1 was released
the worst in bf1 is the assault class
damage falloff is just as bad or worse
bc there arent enough automatic weapons
it's then inconsistent
at one range it's a kill and one step further away it's not
idk I feel that they overtuned things to prevent ace23 microburst meta
If that was the problem then really slow spread decrease woulda been just fine
still the best argument for spread variation by distance and weapon type is CSGO
it obviously works well there why not in battlefield
csgo gunfights often happen at closer ranges than what you see in battlefield
the desert eagle from a toe pit
a to pit is a 50/50 shot
no matter where your crosshair is
and I'm well aware that close range engagements are a sort of meta in battlefield
which is a flaw in map design
too much cover to weave around
well you can also easily pretty much only engage enemies in close range
with smart play
people trying to snipe people with smgs and getting frustrated about low damage or inaccuracy
are playing it wrong
like i get in COD when you see someone you shoot at them, but it doesn't work for a weapon system like in BF1
well you couldn't really snipe with a PDW in BF4
not snipe but kill someone at mid-far range
easily
in bf1 it's not even worth trying usually
and if you could it wasn't nearly as effective as using an AR or DMR
i agree but forcing the class weapons to be used in confined distances is a good thing
the high base spread worked to prevent that
BF1 had the best infantry balance in a long time for battlefield IMO
I agree, but at the cost of the gun play feeling a teensy bit wonky
yeah the main issue were the maps
what's balance for if the base game just feels off
they also overtuned the viability of snipers
having lotsa mid-long range places on a map does the job just fine
like verticality in maps is good, if it's just in maybe one or two central locations
imo class balance can also be fixed by implementing better maps that dont do a lot to cater to close range
if it's everywehre it's awful to play anything but a sniper
also i don't know where they decided to just not have a lot of cover on some maps



