#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 269 of 1
I don’t have any nostalgia or emotional connection because I was a toddler when the original modern warfare games came out
You can camo grind with the worst guns
And have fun
You do that in modern cod and its just a nightmare
I don’t really care for cod snymore
Complexity doesnt equal fun
Fun comes from the core mechanics of the game
Cod used to know whats fun
If the cod franchise ceased to exist I wouldnt care
Wouldn’t affect me in the slightest
I grew up playing cod btw I played bo3 advanced warfare and infinite warfare (shitty Jetpack era)
Halo, cod, potentially battlefield. The only real franchises i love that stays of great quality to this day since my childhood is soulslike games
Halo 3 days…
i mean fair enough me neither, i've bought like 2 cods in the last 6 years
REMEMBER REACH
I wish there were more original ips
Fresh ideas
I feel like there are no good games coming out
No new ghost recon games
they exist, just not from the studios that already have a massive franchise to milk
this year is actually looking really good for new ips
Indie games have greater quality these days
When I get a new ps5 I might check them out
BBR could have been so much bigger but the devs literally threw their game
Have you guys ever played ghost recon
oh have i
Yea
back when they weren't open world
I like it being open world
future soldier was so good
ac shadows is actually huge for them, you can tell they've realised that things aren't going well lol
They fucked up rainbow six into some OW garbage lmao
seriously
I thought that game is a flop
i remember when it was an actual rainbow six game
that's what all the chuds want people to think
Rainbow six siege is so trash
I wish rainbow six patriots came out
It really was fun in the beginning man
When operators were realistic
Now its fucking OW
ac shadows already got 3 million players and it's only going up, and the game itself is really fun and polished
Im very half half about that game
While i am a more of a gameplay centered player, i do care about history as well as how well it is portrayed
I want Ubisoft to go bankrupt so a more competent company can fire all of their management
I must say a black samurai was not my expectation, but the game looks really fun
i was until i saw gameplay from someone who wasn't a journalist. The combat is amazing
you can get it on the ubi subscription for like 15 bucks i think
that's possible, tencent is watching very closely
I would like them to decline enough to realize player retention comes from fun and not some garbage like skins, shitty live service content dripfeeding
kind of stupid to hope a game flops when a lot of people's actual livelihoods depend on it
So it can be revived as a somewhat competent company
And let developers and player communities to create games together
Which is what labs is doing
it feels like that's what's happening with ac shadows. They delayed it and made sure it was polished on release, and now i'd say it's probably the most polished game this year
While that is true
having such a well optimised and non-buggy experience with a AAA game in 2025 was surprising
Proof that journalist opinions are not given any fucks if the game is FUN
If they keep producing low quality stuff they can and will be laid off regardless
But if Ubisoft gets a reality check
absolutely, and there's no shortage of fun here. I haven't enjoyed ac this much since origins
When are the next round of Labs invites going out?
i hear it runs decently well on the steam deck as well
nobody knows
Anyone here got an invite yet?
if they did they can't say
I can’t even participate because I sold my ps5 2 years ago but im gonna buy another one soon
If you enjoy the game man that’s awesome I’m glad your having fun
I just want Ubisoft to come to their senses
And produce quality over quantity
I just miss ezio level fun
It’s kind of like what happened with 2042 it had to fail so dice could wake up
Black flag was great gameplay, ezio was top tier lore
What are some things that you guys hope will be in the next battlefield
Map destruction and bring back Squad points
I hope their will be a large assortment of modern firearms like the new ngsw weapons and germanys new hk416
fortification
Also faction specific colors
grabbing health and ammo from a player would be good too
I agree
I think that’s coming tho
Bringing back ammo/Heath stations
Bring back the squad point system for call ins and such
Which is awesome
Best thing dice has done in years
I hope we will have cool realistic cosmetics
Heavy emphasis on the “realistic” part
No Batman skins in battlefield please
Also a lot of cool vehicles to play around with
I’d they could add some sort of faction that’s kind of like Russia but not after launch with Russian vehicles maybe they could be cool but I understand they don’t went to get embroiled with all of the drama and conflict so they’re sticking either way the pax armada faction for now
NATO and the pmc
Me 😏 BF6?
Do we get more exp in FnB?
Don’t think so
I am stuck on the "connecting" screen to the multiplayer menu of BF1
I can send a screenshot in dms if anyone wants
Not a wifi Issue as I have three bars so I should be good
Why, on God’s green Earth, would you be connected via WiFi?
Hardline your shit bro.
Infantry centered maps (with a lot of options and angles), good enough movement and easy to master for it to be fun for casuals too, hopefully good weapon balance, i want it to have good visibility
Infantry centered yes, but also with the bigger maps for large scale vehicle combat, I hope they aren’t too open like 2042’s maps or BF4’s Golmud Railway. It’s boring.
I hope there will be balanced matchmaking
Well yeah its bf its bound to have large scale maps
Yes, but as long as they mostly ain’t heavily open fields.
Hope domination, frontlines, rush make it back
If there is, at least have good fighting places for infantry
Well it most likely will be
Because thats every large bf map
Then just have good places that infantry can fight.
Its dice it wont happen lol
Theyll find a lot of RNG elements to make sure you lose your gunfights in some way
Theyll also make it slow and boring
If scout cant kill you from 400 meters away then its not a real experience etc etc
I like how I’m highly anticipated for this game like it’s gonna come out soon… at most we got a year.
I gotta find some things I can do in the meantime.
Hamada is a good example
BF4 is great rn as a new experience, but it ain’t gone hold for long playing it constantly every day.
I fucking hate Hamada.
It’s a cool map, I just hate it.
Al Sudan is anther love/hate map
Exactly
Al Sudan though has more of a mix
That’s why I like it a little more.
Aerodrome though is the better style of big map
The only downside is if you’re playing against people who know tanks. Then it’s a nightmare.
But for infantry mostly, Aerodrome is great
I can’t wait to see the CoD “movement demons” so I can strafe them with an attack helicopter.
Aerodome is the only decent large map in bf5
It has reasonable engagement downtimes
It just has extremely bad balance
Why do people keep calling bf players that use movement “cod players”
You’ll tell me “no” as you always do, but on a decent game Iwa Jima is weirdly a good map
Bf was more mechanically demanding than cod at its time
I’m not talking about the BF players that use movement. I’m talking about the fresh players coming from CoD that’ll be introduced to battlefield with this next title. Movement is fine with me in battlefield.
Now it might be the opposite/around same interms of mechanical skill gap with 42 but the only game that didnt really have any movement was 1
Its the only lemon out of the bunch
Fair
Mhm. I wonder what the freshies new to battlefield will think of the battlefield formula. I’m excited for a new player base coming in.
It has bad teambalance aswell but the engagements play out betrer and it has much better flow than a lot of the larger maps yes
Another reason why bf5s larger map suck so much is its visibility
He didn’t tell me no… I’m shocked
You cant make a game where practically everythings invisible regardless of the graphics settings
Tbh Aerodrome is my only true favorite large map
Have extremely large maps with a lot of vegetation*
Hamada and Iwa Jima probably tie for second
Theyll enjoy it but youll see them talk about it being hard and maybe too tactical like usual
Battlefields key element is always positioning tied with movement
Literally have a cousin in law who tried Battlefield and said he didn’t like it cuz the maps are too big…
Give me Seine Crossing
Cod doesnt really require good positioning because of the way that the average players play in the lobbies
They just zerg into each other
No thought
At least CoD players, on average, have some level of brain activity.
Just throw them on Narvik or Devastation
A lot of the maps are too big i think 5 and 4 fell in victim to it heavily
42 aswell
The average BFBoomer… no brain activity is detected.
Wait what??? 😂😂😂
Idk its all braindead gameplay to me
Its more fun to play against though yeah
Id 100% play against people that do something
Rather than like 10 freaks proned in a corner in metro or something
Or in battlefield 4 gatekeeping chokes heavily
Yes, but you need have brain activity to spastically spam buttons, but the average BFBoomie tends to think that BF is a milsim and should be played slow.
Or well any bf game really
I cant tell whats more stupid honestly
Just look at the BF subreddit and you’ll have your answer.
Either some soulless pencilneck button smashing and getting a lucky button click on you or some pleb on accident killing you with something in an x position
I don’t milsim, but do the thing that’s apparently really wrong and take objectives
PTFOing is correct, but you can’t take an obj if you can’t kill the enemy.
I cant look at it im convinced its pure rage bait
Genuine.
I definitely kill too
I dont think any of those players mean or know what they talk about there
I’m on console though and apparently we suck and are irrelevant
I had 3 people jump on me and talk about win ratio being more important than anything else
This is true.
Its a lost cause honestly
Guess it’s time console players quit
Leave it all to the PC people
Or plug in a mouse and keyboard.
Console players just cant talk about what the majority experience in the game
I like a controller/trigger
Next battlefield needs mouse and keyboard
Itll still be an option
I imagine that practically every console player will play on keyboard and mouse if its crossplay again though
Honestly, the only opinion of console players that are valid is saying they don’t want aim assist.
Which it most likely will be
Let them FAFO
I’m just happy we’ve got 47 weapons so far and it’s only Pre-Alpha. I’m feeling we might get close to BF4 levels of weapon content 🙂
Just let them FAFO.
Ok honest question, until I go mkb should I just leave the Discord?
For what
That’s on you, but a good KBM set is like $60.
Is it even allowed on console without be labeled cheating?
Yes.
It is supported by
That’s a shock
You’re joking?
I’ll let you two argue it out
KBM support for FPS on console has been normal since MW19.
Unrelated, but Do y’all really think BF6 will be delayed by GTA?
Neurodeficient question.
I am have are autism delectably.
Youd stleast expect it to be added during patching and in the life span of the game
Same, but I have more XP.
Valid, carry on.
True.
And not that dogshit 125hz shit either.
These 2 arent even remotely related
Let them use GOOD shit.
So it’s not supported?
Lol no
But in all seriousness, Bf4 released alongside GTA5 and it seemed fine.
So back to previous question, until I get a PC should I leave the Discord
No
Your own decision, but PC only gets bigger.
I’ll add to that, no because I like u around, u r friend
Then fine, I’ll just expect that if everything goes well, we’ll get a release this year.
It affects me 🥲
Whatever you say, pickle man, I’ll take your word for it.
Well its pre alpha and we are trying to figure out battlefields identity crisis
Indeed.
BF only has an ID crisis to people who joined at BF1.
BF2 stans know that movement has ALWAYS been implemented.
I joined during BF3, so I get what it is.
Its with everyone i feel like
Bf4 players that played during the time it was more casual and far less players used the movement mechanics properly
Bf5 practically no one uses the movement mechanics in that game
BFV has good movement, imo.
I love the omni slide theres something really satisfying about it
Crouch run was random imo
I never use it personally
True.
/havent found use for it
havent is not a valid command.
Use the help command to see the list of all commands.
I liked it personally because it messed with head positioning while sprinting.
Then i think the animation from going on your back and your stomach shouldnt be a thing it makes a weird effect in 5 and kind of disorts the player model
Assuming playtests happen every 2 weeks, the next one should be April 4th I think, right?
Cant wait.
Yeah the animations from 1 thing to the other were yank
Ngl i feel like this time even if battlefield is trying to make a good battlefield the players will just ruin it
I’ve been waiting for David Sirland to say some more things on X. He hasn’t made any posts or replies since March 23rd. Been wanting more info outta him.
Well its within testing phase so you cant really confirm what will be in the game
Its just bound to have changes so its nothing certain
My favorite response from his was when a dude literally said “Hi David, I’m Eric, Will this game have the multiplayer mode?” And David was just like “Hi Eric, Yes it will”
God Bless David Sirland.
Battlefield players drool on themselves i think
And suck on their thumbs
Like wtf
Can confirm, I am fieldbattle player and I suck on my thumb as an emotional support pacifier.
I want to play BF4 more, but I also want to go to sleep…
hmmmmm. decisions, decisions.
It’s 11:12PM. hmm.
God this is hard.
Go to sleep.
I might drink a Pepsi to help me sleep, I need it.
I haven’t drank water in a couple months now. Longest I did was like 2 years I think, Idfk. I just don’t really drink water. I drink like 11 cans of Pepsi everyday.
How am I alive? nobody knows.
How have I never had a kidney stone? Nobody knows.
And how are my teeth perfectly fine? Nobody knows.
Oh yes, and how do I not have diabetes? Nobody knows.
Other than the fact that I’m 5”8’ and about 106lbs, and don’t gain weight no matter how much I eat. Or the fact I was born in 6 months instead of 9 and almost friggin died if not for the tubes and IV’s running through my head to my toes in an incubator for about 7 weeks in the hospital. And I still look and function like a seemingly normal human being. So how am I here, since November of 2004? Nobody knows. Pretty gnarly, ig.
But to answer your question. No, I will not drink water.
I’m fine.
Nowhere in the NDA does it say you can't admit you were invited. Just that you can't discuss the content of the test or post footage.
Can you still play bf labs or is the play test done?
Honestly with how much has leaked I wonder if they will just announce it
Playtests only last 2 hours and the 1st was March 7th and the 2nd was March 21st, exactly 2 weeks apart, so you can likely expect the next one to take place April 4th.
Bit of a weird question to ask I'm pretty sure
So I got BF2042 on the recent spring discount and I've tried for little under two hours
the game feels fine but somehow kinda floaty at the same time, I've played BF4\HL\1\V previously (on console) and they didn't feel nearly as weird as 2042 does (I really don't know how to explain it)
the thing is, I'm also new to PC, and where I'm living it is significant if I, perchance, refund 2042 and get V instead of it
should I do that considering I also owned BF4\1 on PC?
Might just be the broken mouse input of the game
What region btw
Like na or eu
You mean the clicks themselves or the input in general?
EU
Technically middle east but eu is closest to me (Egypt)
And you already own 1?
I thought it felt weird, honestly
I bought them together on the discount
Thought I might want to jump back into 1 someday
Because its broken kekw its extremely difficult to aim in it because you need to fight the inputs lag of the game
Can't use MnK on console tho?
That's why it felt floaty
At least for BF
Id say start with 1 its better if youre new on keyboard and mouse
Makes sense
But you think I should switch 42 for V like I said or just stick to 42
I really disliked 5 personally so id stick to 42 lol
But 42 isnt a great game either
Idk every game bf has is like a 5/10
True
I mean it could be because I also came into 42 with the negative stuff in mind so I was kinda looking for them
Good enough to have fun but theres just a lot of slop involved
I just try not to pay attention to it
Also the worse your mouse is the worse it is to play bf42
My gaming mouse broke i had to switch to a 10 year old “gaming mouse” i bought for 15 euros as a kid lol
And the input lag is way more noticable on a bad sensor
That's a valid point, I do have a weird mouse called pictek, it does have pretty impressive specs for the price but mainly my hand doesn't feel cramped after a while so that's why I kept it
Could also be because I play alone most of the time
The lack of a squad in general does have an effect
I got relatively small hands
That was supposed to be in the first sentence lol
Yeah then dont get 5 id say
5 is infested with players that stack in squads and spawn trap lobbies
That sentence has so many cursed aspects to it it's just scary
I have 38% winrate and im within top 40-50 in bf5
Purely because the lobbies are insufferable
Entire team neg kd whilist 4-5 players farm the entire lobby in enemy team
It's settled then
I'm sticking with 42 and 1
Oh I forgot, I also got 4 on my account lol
The community servers might be playable but i cant vouch for them havent had the chance to play them
Understandable
4s pacing is way too fast for a new mk user
It also basically requires you to know maps and glitches to have a decent experience
It really doesnt in my experience
A new challenger approaches:
Dude came in with a phoenix wright "Objection!!!"
Idk i cant get past 2-4kpm and lose a lot of fights against glitchers
A lot of peak players glitch anyway so
Now I know what you meant with the "every battlefield is a mess" thing
Literally each one has at least one finiky point to it
Battlefield 1 has the best community and playability with decent gunplay mechanics but its just kind of boring to play
And its also riddled with bad mechanics and bugs and just yeah
Its not very good
Eu
You uhhh
You free rn?
Nah probably wont be til later in the evening
1 is goated.
It has a lot of wierd mechanics but once you get the hang of them there is a lot more depth than people give credit.
It also lets you captain a dreadnought
There isnt
Bf1 has the least amount of depth interms of gameplay mechanics
I'll probably be there if you need a dude to laugh at in game
42 to be specific
While that's technically a flaw, it's the most accessable
And i have 1.4k hours in bf1 4-5kpm player with an average of 4kd so its within top 10-20
I understand the mechanics fairly well
But has the most in terms of decision making. Because BF1 puts the most limits on the player, both in movement and class balance, which forces you to make tradeoffs that you dont have to make in other bf games.
Out of all of them, 1 easily has me switching out my kit and trying to coordinate iwht other players the most.
While 4 is just kind of a "fuck around for 40 minutes" type game.
Other games have equal amount of decision making
They just have less bad mechanics
In some things anyway
It isnt
Not really. Rarely in 4 have I ever asked "Oh how do I solve this problem" in a way I have in 1
Yeah but its the same
It might be purely because bf1 doesnt really require more than just good positioning
And timing
Whilist other battlefields required that and a little more mechanical skill
You didn’t read more of the backlogs.
It puts a lot more pressure on that, especially cause 4 guns are kinda piss easy to use
Like in any other game except for 5
Arguably 42 because of mouse input lag but mechanically no
At this point, I think the input lag is intentional.
Saying 42 is hardest cause of input lag is like saying the game would take more skill if you had to play while being attacked by rats lmao
yo, it seems like type 100's mastery 4 assignment is not working in combined arms, is that normal? (it doesnt state anything about pvp or objective areas, just get kills from less than 30 meters
Doesnt take more skill its just harder to play because the engine is broken
yeah. rip
5 I feel has a lot of interesting ideas but never made a cohesive game out of them
It feels like someone took BF1, BF2, and BF Heroes and shoved them in a blender
5 is idk
Id like it way more if it didnt have spread to recoil conversion
And decent matchmaking balance
V is the result of DICE smoking the WW1 pack and thinking that the WW2 pack was going sell.
V would have been miles better if it was just BF1 with a ww2 paint
God no.
BF1, in some ways, is a worse atrocity of the series than 2042.
You started with playing bf1?
I started playing with 4, then got into 2 for a while. BF1 just really grew on my over the years
Its my most played battlefield and i agree 100%
The game is just not good
But thats with a lot of battlefield games
Like all i want is just good maps
BF1 essentially deleted skill gap and rewarded milsim play.
Unironically, BF1 was the closest to a milsim.
I wouldnt go that far
Youre smoking crack if you think BF1 plays like a milsim
And YOU'RE smoking meth if you think that BFV would've been better if it was BF1, but WW2.
Its closer than other titles but its very very far from milsim still
I'm of the opinion of the only reason why people do not like a fast BF game is because of ||skill issues||.
Regardless of your opinion on 1, it would have at the very least had a coherent vision for the game.
If anything doomed 5 it was a lack of direction
Lack of direction has been an ongoing issue for 9 years
^true
This smells a lot like an opinion generated by the recent movement discourse rather than anything from actually playing the game.
Look at it this way..
BF1 killed the franchise for veterans.
But
Made it accessible to new comers.
For the franchise as a whole maybe, but most BF games have a specific direction
Ima be real, 4 is not harder than 1. Like at all.
Never stated this.
then what do you mean by more accessible?
I'm saying that BF1 spat in the face of people loyal to the franchise.
Even more so than the BF4 launch did.
Eh idk
I think thats a far stretch
really smells like a manufactured hate ngl
Oh okay
The only people who didnt really enjoy bf1 were just bf4 players that want to have more movement options in the game
But bf1s playerbase is much larger than 4s
And within activity its also the largest
So it delivered the most despite the lack of skill it mightve taken
And even if it takes less skill than bf games that required some movement mechanics to be good at id still consider it a game that majority of people will struggle to fully master
My problem is just that it removed a core component of Battlefield that makes it so.
Battlefield just needs a middleground for these types of players
It deviates more from the core components than 2042.
nooooooo they should not this is how you get 5. Focus on a vision for a game and execute on it.
Simple enough movement for mostly everyone to be able to master it, grounded enough for you to not meed to move well inorder to still play good but with enough mechanics to master to keep players that want something more mechanical interested
whats the core component in question?
Neurodefficent take.
Movement.
As much as people are spazzing out....
Battlefield has always had movement.
BF2, 3 and 4 all had movement.
Oh so this is absolutely a take generated just by the recent discourse got it
100%, BF1 is the biggest departure in the mainline franchise and they aimed for pleasing a completely new audience instead of their dedicated playerbase.
I think the people that are shitting on people over movement are equally over reacting to people that want less movement
Both playerbases are kind of stupid in that sense
And then they doubled down on the casual audience further with the strafe and slide changes.
Frankly I have seen more thought terminating cliche's from them.
Regardless of the movement mechanics of 5 and 42 its still a positioning biased game
I'll make this simple.
And takes equally as little skill as 1
If you are of the opinion that Battlefield has never had movement, you are genuinely brain dead.
This was a post on X.
User: “Humble suggestion: please listen be careful in taking advice. A lot of advice will naturally be all over the place as people seek their preferred shooters with a BF skin on top (and this includes everyone from milsim fans to CoD fans). BF is its own thing with its own feel.”
David Sirland’s response: “Of course. We've been down this track a couple of times before. Both BF4 CTE and BF1 CTE. Thanks for the concern though!”
Extra from David Sirland, another reply to somebody: “It also doesnt mean feedback becomes what drives development. We use equal amounts of feedback, data and confirmation connected to the goals we have for our various design areas. Some of these we'll rewamp based on outcomes - but a majority we'll hone the balance of.”
They DO have a vision for what they want the game to be and will execute on it.
Thats just a factually wrong take
Like theres no argument in it
I dont think players disagree with it they just dont want it for whatever reason
Majority of players never even use any of the movement mechanics
Then these are not Battlefielders.
Yes, this is a good sign. Its good game design fundamentals, which feel like theyve either been lacking or hampered in recent bf titles.
The only battlefield game where you see any movement mechanics being used and played correctly is 4
Incorrect.
2 and 3 have movement.
Well theres the dolphin dive in bf2 but everyone hates that
You wont see it because those games are dead
Im talking about currently active
I'm old enough to remember the movement.
I remember guides getting posted on YT for BF2.
We are all aware of them
But bf2 and 3 are just dead
Yes, they are.
Rip 2, you will be missed
No one plays it so you wont really experience it
So 4 is pretty much the only game where any decent players reside still
No, they won't experience it.
@teal fractal important question bro, can I has a pickle?
"they"
Lmao dude you need to get some fresh air
B R E A T H A I R
Ye we are far past bf2 and 3 and 4 is pretty much acient history atp
respirate
Not very good to be hard stuck on older games
I'm not stuck on them, but you need to look at the history of the franchise to know it core components.
I N H A L E E X H A L E R E P E A T
hard disagree. If a game still has players and is still good then its worth your time.
I know the core components im not disagreeing but i just think a lot of people are very hard stuck on how older games played back then
We will never have that again
Its over
I know we won't have it again.
So its kind of a stupid ask to beg for that same thing
And “movement players” are over reacting because theres only 1 game since bf2 that hasnt had any real movement
Like they are hyperfixated on a single game when every other game had movement and we are all well aware
the entire discourse has devolved into a sludge and half the time people agrue on a stance they agree with
To that point.
People also had bf2 players complain about movement then
It does have the largest playerbase.
And guess what?
It will always be a thing
^
So its just meaningless to preach it
People who listen will listen those who wont they wont
dolphin diving was particuarly obnoxious in 2 tbf, and I dont recall anyone acutally missing it
All I care about is battlefield 6 battle royale mode and long as it have movement then no complaints from me
I’m most excited for the HK417 in 6. Seems like a fun Battle Rifle to use.
Also like the AK-205. Modernized AK-74, yeah I’ll take that.
If they make a genuinely good free to play battleroyale game it might go extremely well for ea
U think they’ll pull this one off?
Lol no
theyre really trying to make a new br in the year of our lord 2025 this thing is dead on arrival
Theres been 2 attempts they both failed miserably
It can be yeah
I’ll play it either way
If they test it and actually listen to players i cant really see it fail
If it doesnt sell well in testing then theyll drop it and there wont be a flop
Easy as that.
Im not even sure if I will tbh. I dont think I ever touched hazard zone
I haven't played it because I'm not going to queue for another 4 hours.
really bummed out that BF4 runs at 720p on the series x
somehow i doubt we're missing much
I’m hoping it’s good tho
true, i didn’t think of that
Upgrade to MasterRace
I really disliked the idea of br games so ive never played br games
only BR I've ever really liked were PUBG and the first year of cod warzone
I've disliked BR as well, but it appeals to specific spastics.
My main question is, if I want to play a BR, why would I play this one.
Fucking same, but I’ve gotten used to it for playing over a week. It’s not as hard to see people as I thought it would. And also it doesn’t bother me as much appreciating how old the game is anyways.
Ask EA.
I think theres too much cheese and rng elements in those games and its just boring to run around for 40 minutes for a few kills you run into in that time
Thats why i never enjoyed them
I’m really not much of a battlefield player I’m more cod but I have high hopes for battlefield
I have hopes. Dunno if theyre high. Dunno if they even can be high
I mean... so long as he doesn't play on console, he should survive.
well the next battleifled HAS to be good
If it can get close to BF4 or unlikely even top it, I’d be satisfied.
If they flop it the series is pretty fucked i think
It does, or it'll go the way of MoH.
Exactly.
Forgot about Hardline for a moment?
But people just enjoyed 1 even though it wasnt like a very good battlefield game
swbf2
Oh yeah hardline too
WHAT
I've been trying to resurrect Hardline, but no luck.
I played every battlefield after hardline
1 wasn’t a good Battlefield game? Definitely a hot take.
even BF3 has a higher population than hardline
After 1.4k hours and playing bf1 at a high level along with other games i could write a bible about why it isnt good
What I’m sayin
Like SWBF2 was a catastrophic screw up for EA because it took a nuke to their future buisness plans.
BF1 is a great game, but personally I'm not into the WW1 (and WW2) settings in shooters
We’ll just give me ur one biggest reason y, that’s all I really wanna hear.
i prefer modern/near future setting (og mw trilogy, bo2, ghosts, BF3/4)
This is my first time ever talking in this server, heck it’s 1:30 in the morning. And I wasn’t gonna say anything I just randomly opened up this and this is what I see.
Like some casual player that doesnt pay attention to what they play wont care but objectively and ideally as a battlefield game there was a lot of players that felt fucked over with 1
And I hope that they don’t start adding bullshxt skins like cod
BFV Tom Cruise elite skin
Regardless of how well bf1 sold and how high its held in regards its filled to the brim with bad mechanics bugs, community wide issues, bad map designs
2042 got really bad backlash for exotic cosmetics and EA backed down with it, and kept cosmetics more military grounded.
probably not at launch, but i wouldn't be suprised if they're added at some point in its life cycle
And bf2,3,4 having movement in it the og players were kind of screwed over expecting that
i personally want bf v movement to return
I'm not opposed to cosmetics, even at launch, but they need to be tasteful for a Battlefield game.
It’s literally coming back, with some modernizations that is.
BF != CoD.
6 movement looks like the pace of 4 with some of the mechanics of V.
haven't seen any leaks, besides some screenshots don't wanna be spoiled
So a player that really hasnt played much of 4 or played it very casually/a player that started on 1 will say something very different to players that started the game from bf2
the floodgates are open dude I wouldnt be trying to avoid spoiler (Not sure how you spoil a multiplayer game anyway)
Respectable. But you don’t really need to…
Never found the maps too bad, bugs were never massive in my opinion, honestly the game excelled with the atmosphere in the rugged gameplay of World War 1. Exactly the kind of experience I wanted
Both are correct in their own minds but they all just need to sit down on it and settle on a middleground
Yeah thats the only thing players mention when they make good remarks
Good graphics
Atmosphere
Ignoring balance issues within team and maps, ignoring a lot of fairly annoying and tedious mechanics
Except me:
BF1's gunplay is unironically good.
Good gameplay, fun vehicles, weapons could be a little bland but overall they were fun.
The gunplay is good yeah
i dont really give af about the graphics, even 10 year old games look amazing still, don't want miniscule graphical improvements for terrible optimization in exchange
But theres way more mechanics than just gunplay
which ones are you thinking of, if any specifically
no offense, but maybe u just have bad graphics and atmosphere. Ur literally a pickle.
cause 90% of the time its when someone is talking about spread
Well the gadgets for example, they were all extremely spammable with very little counter play opportunities
Plus the operations game mode was almost perfect in all regards in my opinion (other than maybe sometimes the game would be very one-sided)
what?
Headglitching is pretty broken in 1
Though id say even more so in 5
Theres countless revive bugs
I’ve only really ever encountered one. And never anything game breaking.
Doesnt have to be game breaking for it to be an issue or an annoyance
@teal fractal how many weapons u expect we gonna get on launch? we’ve got 47 in the pre alpha playtest already (hopefully as launch content)
Idk
I dont care aslong as weapon balance is okay
I expect about 15.
15 😭 we literally got only 22 on 2042 launch
The sweet spot mechanic gets the job done IMO. Since its a ww1 game you need some way to run a bolt action with iron sights effectivley. The sweet spot mechanic does this fairly well, without letting the scout be a close range cannon, and its a great way to make the different rifles feel a bit unique when bolt actions have historically all felt identical.
I dont think it should have been on sniper variants, though. I think that should have been an infantry only mechanic
Sweetspot was a mistake, and I'm sure a good amount of people agree with that.
Flat out, a mistake.
Eh
Oh I know this one is an unpopular opinion, but I think it works.
V removed it and trying to play with the standard rifle of any faction that isnt the US because of it feels bad.
I wouldnt want it in 6 though.
I hope we get fun feeling optics. 2042’s options of optics are boring.
what exactly makes an optic feel "fun"
And a lot of them don’t even look good on the weapons.
Don't get me started on 2042 optics.
How they visually look and feel to use.
I guess
The feel problem is the fact that they are not zero'd to a standard distance.
I think they are all just 0
lmfao why am I not suprised
I've done testing for at least 15 hours on the R10 on why I wasn't hitting shots with the Bolt Rack.
Turns out... The only 4x is zero'd to 0 meters. 🙂
Its a horrible mechanic that just gives worse players a better chance at getting kills and good players to have a thing to heavily abuse
And that doesn't align with the distance markers on the optic.
You cant fight against it
Well theres suppression but you cant exactly fight against a headshot either.
Getting sweetspotted by some random lvl 3 scout thats doing nothing his entire game is extremely infurating
Suppression is also a horrible mechanic yeah
Extremely is putting it lightly.
Dude, using the red dot, it looks like your dot is a sticker.
Suppression should be purely visual if itll exist at all
Something something optic projection something something.
On my Xbox one S/x series, how or where do I go to download the beta or is it from one of the existing games?
Just give the fucking 7x on the R10, Dice.
asking for a friend!?
Could have bin thinner, I don’t like how THICK it is in the small little frame.
Beta?
JoeShrug
A lot of people werent very happy with variation system in 1 either which i didnt particularly care for but i can see people being upset after playing 2,3,4
Suppression is a great way to counter an enemy who is beyond your effective range, as opposed to just never peaking or dying.
I think it should require more deliberate action to proc however. And BF1 in particular does a teribble job of conveying when you are suppressed.
In 6 it seems to be a very quick jerk of your PoV instead of a lingering debuff. Will be interesting to see how that plays out.
And hardline
Hardline had potential.
What are you talking about, my friend?
If only EA waited out the BF4 lifespan....
It just enables the person who reacted first to win a fight regardless if he misses or not
Because him missing makes you miss
Isn’t there a beta for the new game @woeful marlin
And you cant move to cover because no movement
Suppression is a reward for being bad at the game. That's the TL;DR on Suppression.
Sorry for being a virgin… I grew up on the beginning titles hahaa
So youre just fucked
which is why I think it needs to be more deliberate. Such as sustained fire, and maybe not be able to be procced by small caliber weapons like smgs
It shouldnt exist at all
Its stupid
Or make it visual like 42 has it
42s visual suppression is okay
Did I just see an argument for suppression?
In every bf game there is a large number of areas where there simply is not cover.
The next battlefield title is currently in pre-alpha, and it seems to have a 2 hour long playtest every 2 weeks on Friday. Only people who have signed up for EA labs and who show interest in the Battlefields testing have the possibility of being invited through email to install it. The next playtest will likely take place Friday, April 4th.
Yeah because you for some reason play into areas without cover
Ive discussed this with 100s of bad battlefield players ive “coached”
They all talk about having no cover
There is cover
They just dont use it
You’re a FUCKING LEGEND! 🐐🐐🐐!!! Thank you very much sir!
Np G, god bless
At the end of the day you gotta get from A to B and, especially in 1, that will often mean moving in the open.
It is, at the very least, far more interesting than "there is a sniper here, avoid this entire portion of the map."
What’s your gamertag? Hopefully we can game on the 4th or when the title releases!?
@woeful marlin
You say this because you play the game wrong
No offense
I see why people dislike variants. However, because the options are only available in predefined sets, those variants have much more drastic stat differences then you could reasonably make with attachments. I kinda like it
Xbox, MigratoryBee#400. hit me up on any battlefield of either 1, 4, 5, and 2042. Though 2042 performs shit rn on my internet which needs some tweaking to run smoother, my router has issues recently.
Hey man, its another option available. I can keep a sniper pinned and use that to cross a gap, then I havent played the game wrong.
I want friends anyways to play BF with
Keep an eye out for BLACKEYEFIGHTNG
Interesting user
Platform?
Xbox
Now is there supposed to be an “I” in ur user or is it really “BLACKEYEFIGHTNG”
Edit: nvm, I see now.
Like yeah people are right that suppression rewards missing, but that just means its too easy to proc. That doesnt mean the concept is flawed.
No “i” in the ing of fighting
Already noted.
Back in the day when I was doing mma haha
Hell yeah
Yeah… when tapout was the shit… chuck the iceman Lindell, Tito Ortiz those days!
Then pro ball hit and I had to put down the gloves haha
Sent it over brother
Have a great night hombre!
Np man, u too.
No its just that because you cant find cover doesnt mean it doesnt exactly exist
Either that or you dont know maps very well yet so you dont really know how to rotate between objectives and know the better playroutes
Keep in mind youre playing a positioning based shooter game so playing around cover and angles is the most essential part of the entire game
I had a player telling me that he cant find any cover in monte grappa i ended up sending him like 30 screenshots within the first 20-30 meters
Of different positions and their angles
What’s the yap this evening
Nothing tbh
Sure, it's your account not mine
That's not true
Do you need help
they truly need a step by step sentence for people like that
like have a lot of examples

?
you didn’t even help me
Morning...
I hope Console-PC crossplay is opt-in only this time.
Default should be opt out
Is there sniper sway on pc on battlefield 1 if so how do I hold my breath
I hope so too. This is why I play on old gen, to avoid PC.
I don't need to be better because I usually finish games first with the highest score, most kills, and captured flags. And I'm not a teenager with all the time in the world: family, work, and other hobbies. So I'm fine.
There are a lot of cheaters on PC (look at COD). If I wanted to play on PC, I would. That's why I have a console. Simplicity and peace of mind when faced with cheaters.
I don't care who's better. Simple: if crossplay is forced, my friends and I aren't, we won't buy the game. lol.
This is a typical cyclical discussion.
funny how you talk about cheaters and then use a completely different franchise as an example lol
Crossplay is why movement has become a big issue. Console BF never had movement spam problems
Cod isn’t full of cheaters rn and is pretty easy on pc even with controller. I am usually at top of my leaderboards on cod
console players always have this insane view that pc is full of cheaters when you'll be lucky to run into one per month, and even that's rare
Nah man it was never close to the shit Enders posted in his stupid video on consoles
Exactly. We never had those problems and annoyances. There are people who insist on FORCEDLY mixing them, and I'll never understand why. Just enable optional crossplay (turned off from the start) and that's it. The PC has never needed consoles. Let the players decide how to play.
PS, XB, Switch on by default. Console players opt in to play with PC
i mean if it makes the whining stop it's probably a net positive
Hopefully! This is how common sense would prevail over stupidity and no-sense.
Howdy yall just came here to ask a question, is bf1 for xbox down rn or something? Whenever I open it up it tells me there's no servers anywhere
Really confused since ive never had this issue before
Is there sniper sway in bf1
Never ask a console player how many cronus have sold
lol yeah they act like cheaters don't exist on console too
Nah hes not wrong players rarely used vouzou mouzou rouzou
They at most jump peeked
And in 42 they rarely move aswell
But thats why its said that its practically an entirely different game on console
They just play it in a very different manner
If you play older titles then play community servers
sounds like a skill issue tbh
Ye
I can see why console players have that view point
Simple solution would be to remove crossplay
Or give console players mouse and keyboard
yeah i guess pc has enough players anyway
Crossplay doesnt exist to make the game more active its not necessary
Dunno what that means but does anyone have a fix for my server issue? Still can't figure it out tbh
It exists so people cross platform can play with eachother
And yes I used server browser and nothing was there either
Region?
Let me check rq, not exactly sure considering I'm located in jamaica but give me a sec and I'll check
Server region is north america
Literally not a single match pops up for me and before today it never did this to me
Xbox right
Yeah I'm on series s
17 servers 539 players 12 in que
Probably some wrong filter settings
Specific maps, specific mode
Maybe server sizes
The only filter I've got on is for North america and I never messed with the filter otherwise
Weird
But try messing with it or reset it all together
Wait some weird slots filter was turned on, literally never touched it before but turned it off and all the matches reappeared lmao
Thanks a ton for the help bro
Nice nice
Agreed
And PC players opt in if they want cross play. Also make certain it actually works. PC had enough players in bf2042 but it wasn’t unusual for it to struggle to find a game if you switched cross play off (might have been fixed long time since I played)
How about you guys just get your own version of the game and we get a console version
Nobody will miss you PC players
And another pathetic post by the toxic kid.
Consoles should be separate but I don’t think it’s that deep this newer gen is supposed to be like pc with steam on it
Get it
There’s already mfs out here w zim
Cross play is a good thing. Gives you the choice. In other games I can be playing on the PC, the wife on laptop and my kid on PS5. Good fun. For BF I think it needs to be off as default.
Yeah crossplay is good as long as you have the option to turn it off
As a console player I don't hate playing against PC players, like they def have an advantage but it does make for a nice challenge if I'm in a good mood
it’s not that deep bf is a meme lol unless your competing for money which 99% aren’t then I don’t see an issue. Cheats on the other hand. Middle finger to you
But I'd rather have console crossplay where I play against Playstation just because there are some days where getting fucked over by PC sweats gets really annoying
And obv hackers exist
Playstation vs Xbox lobbies will be popular
It can be the biggest thing in fps history
how about Nintendo
Gotta throw them in somehow
wish I can make a joke without getting a warning
Just let me in dice
Maybe the wrong channel to ask but is r/Battlefield frozen for anyone else? Can’t see any new comments or posts since yesterday
Yes, but this is another option. If it works, then Im not playing the game wrong.
You seem to be missing the plot a bit
in other words this server is a joke xD
thank god please burn that site down entirely
in some ways
but will say there’s some things that they need to work on but
I will they’re “trying”
but yea there’s a really difference
Like a big one
EA just loves censorship ^^
well Americans generally love censorship, that's what I gathered xD
that's not news
Yo whats up everyone! Long time BF fan here (BF4 for life, it will never die). I just built a PC and got BF4 on PC. I keep getting kicked from matches by punkbuster though? Any tips?
you need a punkbuster update I think, usually you can find that in the installation directory of BF4
or head onto https://www.evenbalance.com/ @celest ice to manually update BF4's punkbuster
i play in my laptop it has a R7 5k series cpu and an rtx 3050 any settings, in-game settings + OS settings(i use wi11) is required ploxxx tell
lol what
tf ahaha
thanks!
brother is tweaking
Eating a sandwich backwards works too it doesnt mean its the right way to eat it
And its not an opinion lol i know theres loads of options for cover
what the hell is eating a sandwhich backwards.
what is a backwards sandwich?
Like
Top of the crust first?
Burrowing into it from the top like a rodent
Yes
Like you put all your shit on it and then you flip it around
But regardless, if I use suppression to keep someone from shooting at me, then use that to cross a gap I otherwise wouldnt, then thats just the mechanic as intended. Thats not a wierd or backwards way to use it, thats using suppression to suppress. Thats just playing the game.
(also its an option not an opinion)
Thats like saying smoke grenades are the wrong way to play because theres other forms of concealment.
Funny thing you mention that. Had a guy yesterday who called using smokes an abuse and glitch. Guess he wasn't too happy about the 3 flanks on reddacted......
Smoke grenades are cheating because you can hide in a bush
Well
- Why do you need to cross the map, 2) do you really need to pick that fight 3) what will you do after you cross
Like i cant think of any reason why id want to run through a open field on any map
No
No
Let us shoot at the same time too
Riots shields should work that if youve held it up for more than 5 seonds itll zap you irl
Lmao I rarely ran into someone using it but when I did oh did I have the field day
I love how every support has a shield in battlefield hardline
That should be for jet rammers
more of an annoyance
They should bring em back so more pepole suffer
I hope whoever places claymores sleeps through his alarms
Me for whoever spamming xm25
Spaming XM25 on operation locker and metro is how god intended to be played
Idk why they add braindead gadgets into games honestly
No one can stop us
No one has fun playing against them
Eod bot
Sph launcher is stupid too
On metro
All must suffer
💀
Speed, and taking an off angle usually.
Heres a quick example off the top of my head: the windmill at the end of St Quentins Scar. The windmill sits on top of a hill, facing onto a road and open plain. There is a rock. Players on top of the hill and windmill have a clear line of sight on almost all approaches.
The attackers have several options. Tanks can force the enemy to fall back from the top of the hill, as can fire from both scouts and support. But theres no trench to sneak through and unless you take a roundabout route on the hill you will always be vulnerable to fire from point B.
In this scenario, why forgo trying to suppress any stray snipers watching the sightline? If you do this you open up a clear route from St Quentins to the windmill.
Luckiky bf4 community servers on eu ban xm25 and explosives
Damn man had it all pre typed in notess
this was just an example fresh in my head from a match a few days ago.
Youre talking about ops?
Yeah its an ops match.
Mostly cause a conquest example has many more factor s in play which make it much worse for typing out a hypothetical
Just
Shoot him
From an angle
Dead
You dont have to run all the way to the windmill
I hate when servers ban items that are not even that usefull
The attackers have several options. Tanks can force the enemy to fall back from the top of the hill, as can fire from both scouts and support. But theres no trench to sneak through and unless you take a roundabout route on the hill you will always be vulnerable to fire from point B.
You realize that the last sector the attackers go up an angle right
hold on is point b the windmill or the town next to it?
Theres trees and rocks and potholes in that upward angle
I assume youre talking about the last objectives windmil
Im saying that the route to the windmill is also vulnerable to fire from the town on the left.
If youre talking about the windmil in the middle of the town then whoevers in there is 100% dead anyway
Man just get in the attack plane and drop a bunch of grenades on they ahh
solves all problems
Smokes
then when you kill them do a aerial tbag(barrel roll)
yeah.
Whats the difference between smokes and suppressing a player?
Im not gonna tell you thats its a required mechanic, just that its a viable one.
1 is meaningless 1 provides cover
1 prevents someone from accuratatley shooting at you.
just put cod movement with mixed up battlefield 4
They can still shoot at you like any other player
If i see a red dot and some pleb randomly spraying ill take an angle and pick them out
Unless you run flir 😎
sure and the spread will hamper that, especially if you are at a range where the player suppresing you cant just shoot you.
The thing is you have to counter it some how and youre suppressed because they miss
Clearly you never played redacted and to had to run away from an angry swarm of Dozers.
But them missing means that youre getting suppressed aswell
So it comes down to who controls spread better
Yeah, well 2042 had your riot shield and its not very funny xD
depends on the class. The most common case is going to be an automatic weapon vs a bolt action rifle. The latter cannot suppress nearly as well.
But yeah garbage mechanic
Its always some console player that uses it
Is the riot sheild actually good or is it just a meme kit
You cant really do anything if its walking towards you in a straight line
The shield wont break
And you cant shoot feet under
I mean theres a good chance support still gets a riot shield
Depends on the map. If you play redacted and you have a dozzer sitting on one of the ziplines leading upwards, your team is pretty much fucked, since dozzer can just one hit you with his shield, and to top it off, they play shotgun too.
So in spots with no space youre just dead
On open maps its not that good, but if you have a choke point then a good dozer can be a menace.
No ziplines hopefully in the next bf. We need a whole lot less vertically and more lanes
Put a stair well or elevator don’t be lazy with ziplines and grapples
Ziplines open for more creative map design
Since you aren't constrained to elevators and such
Hello, just joined this group. looks great. Silly question but is there a way to LFG for a squad
Found it!
No. Over vertically is bad. Not everyone needs to be on a gd roof lol
Ye no ziplines probably means that we wont have people camping in some x spots or will have absurd high ground
Ziplines in hardline and BF2 where fine
Too many mf camping not enough PTFOing 😤
They require well designed maps that don’t lead to half the team camping sound bugger all else.
Its a playerbase and map issue
You missed what i said completely
Also if Im not mistaken in bf2042 you can ride up a zipline unlike 2 and hardline
Going from memory bf2 exp special forces first had them.
Yes sir
Alongside the grapling Hook and CS gas
we don’t need 16 dudes on a roof make it less then you wonder why one team demolishes the other. Limiting roof/ high ground access will def improve the game
Promotes camping
Does anyone know what's happening with the r/battlefield subreddit? Did they lock it because of the datamines?
On any map in any BF game if you have a bad team, you WILL have 10 snipers and a tank sitting at spawn trying to snipe pepole
Well make it less . Make it harder for those 20 snipers
Elevation or not
It’s too easy to do atp just pull a grapple out and sit on a roof. Make it more dif for that style so it’s less incentivized
And rewarding
Its been an issue since 1942
Good luck fixing it
People just use different ways to get elevation
If you wanna be on a roof you gotta run up a stair well. Takes more time and effort to do that just 1 sec your up there
Helis and planes exist
Def
Doesn't matter, spawn beacon solves the cooldown issue
true but having easier access to ziplines everywhere just makes it more appealing to be on a mf roof
No one wants to play a game like that
Siege of shanghai snipers did not need no zipline
Vertically is a problem solve it with more lanes
Sure and i never said give easy access everywhere with ziplines
it was tolerable lol mfs had to work for it if helis where gone
Then the team was out a heli for a minute 💀
Every good roof had elevator access or you could just parachute anywhere you wanted if you had the skyscraper flag
attack chopper was usually pretty good at taking them out anyway . They couldn’t last
Let me see that lone Doritos chip 😤
who have the 5
when can we start testing the new battlefield?
just wait and see like everyone else
Grapling hook was what made 42 good
Battlefield 2042 BF4 Ballistic Shield 🛡
42 would be awful to play without it
Bruh I want bad company 3 so badly
i just bought battlefield 1 like 2 days ago and every time i try to launch it, it gaves me an error message
"DirectX Error
DirectX function
"m_renderer-> createSwapChain(&swapChainDesc, &swapChainObj)" failed with DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_REMOVED
('The video card has been physically removed from the system, or a driver upgrade for the video card has occurred. ').
GPU: "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU", Driver: 57283.
This error is usually caused by the graphics driver crashing; try installing the latest drivers.
Also, make sure you have a supported graphics card with at least 2GB."
grappling hook was never necessary until 2042 came out
it's such a crutch for garbage map design
also, 25 sec cooldown for a simple grapple hook is really dumb. overnerfed imo
meanwhile sundance gets a scatter every like 9 seconds
well there was also a grappling hook back in BF2, I think then it was the first time it ever appeared in any BF game
well the Expansion pack of BF2
it was also in hardline as a pickup
scatter grenade shouldnt exist at all
its the most annoying gadget in the game along with sph launcher

heh