Cellar Darling - Black Moon [Finished]

[round quarry]

All path in B std
Alt lead is a Vocal+Hurdy Gurdy
Lead contains Hurdy Gurdy part when warranted

[unkempt sail]

Will make time to have a look soonest. I really enjoyed the other Cellar Darling chart...thanks!

[round quarry]

and more to come, it's a full album work in progress

[unkempt sail]

First look on Bass - IMO, the tone volume need a boost. Played through on two different basses and had difficulty hearing what I was playing on both.

Bass - this tiny first Phrase should likely be merged.

Here the 8A notes are fretted with finger 1, but finger 2 makes more sense IMO. Similar parts later on in the song use finger 2 for the 8A. 👍 Will have a spin on the guitars when able. Good song!

[unkempt sail]

This includes playing intentional incorrect notes on purpose (though I'm likely to get the notes wrong anyway 🤣 ).

[round quarry]

it's not that complex, I'm sure you played more correct note than the wrong one

[unkempt sail]

For sure. At some point a couple years ago, pengo mentioned he liked to play wrong notes on purpose to help test chart tone volume levels.

[timid hound]

only thing I've noticed thus far is that this part felt lacking a tone change, would like something with a bit of a boost and that makes it stand out more

ok I see shortly after there is a lead tone change for a different part

I found that one quiet too IMO

could barely hear what I was playing

sustains touching the next note? or nearly touching at least? should have a bit more of a gap there

personally I wouldn't mind if the main distortion was a bit louder too

Only other thing I'd mention that I'd mention to other people so no point in not letting you know too:

Your filename and version number for your pre-release version is version 1. We've been pushing people to name such pre-release versions as V0.1, V0.2 etc. or something so that it is clearer and easier to manage when sending to other to test. Then the first public release can be Version 1. Especially since when downloading a filename with duplicate name means it adds a (1) next to the file automatically instead of replacing it. Makes it a lot easier on everyone if you can get in the habit of changing version number, DLC key and arrangement IDs for each new build and making sure the first public release is V1 🫡

[round quarry]

My main issue with that is that I'm publishing it here when I already have gone through 6 or 7 test versions of my own and that I do consider this as close as I can make to a V1 on my own. On top of that, I rarely need to go through much edits after which I find hardly justify to call that a 0.9 or something

[timid hound]

so if you consider it V1 why even ask for feedback in here lol

like sorry I just don't understand that justification

anyway I'll continue telling other people the same thing

you don't have to call it v0.9

you can call it 0.1 sicne its pre release

[round quarry]

because others pair of eyes/ears are always good to have and the fact it's a V1 doesn't change that at all

[timid hound]

main issue would be not the same version number as whatever ends up on CF

[round quarry]

but I've already gone through those version myself

[timid hound]

word

[round quarry]

this is exactly what I would have released on CF before this channel was made, I share it here and give it some time to avoid rushing myself and to allow other opinions to catch small things I may have missed or ignored for whatever reason, the version number don't change anything for that

[timid hound]

so will you release on CF as V1.1?

[round quarry]

I don't know yet, it'll depend on the amount of edit and if it justify it

[timid hound]

I think regardless of significance of change it should always be a new version number

and again it's just plain confusing

idk man I made myself pretty clear

you don't have to do anything I'm not staff

just telling you what I tell others to facilitate things smoother for testing

[round quarry]

https://ignition4.customsforge.com/cdlc/99356