#Early access is a business model
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
not at all what I'm referencing, but ok
and also, theres basically no excuse why they cannot release the EA
basically them saying "We just wanna polish some things up)
Ok dude I don't know how to explain this to you but you are way out of your depth
do I need to explain why you are dramatising your stance here?
do I need to explain and even fight over fact?
I'm not overdramatising anything. I'm a programmer and devops engineer. I have years of experience working with programmers to develop software.
Do you have any experience writing or developing software in any capacity?
okay, and I don't need to be anything to know whats fact and basic logic
sure
Everything you're saying is based on massive amounts of assumptions
sure
When you have no idea how software is developed
It has everything to do with what you're saying, which is just what you don't realize
They don't have things to polish up
They have literal functionality and content and things to build and test and get into the game that isn't even remotely ready or in the game yet
But it is true, which is WHY they chose to do early access
Because they knew their product was not going to be ready
Like do you think they just don't know wtf they're doing?
No no no, my stance is that they are not releasing EA early because of them polishing up
Do you think they're all just dumb and making stupid decisions/
This isn't polishing up dude
We are working hard to polish it at least to the same level of quality you have seen in the demo PLUS we still hope to squeeze in some QoL requests we have heard in the last few weeks. \
- dev
Polishing up would mean they had a ton of the game functionality built as well as content
Yeah the level of quality IN THE DEMO
And you think this DEMO is stable and functional when a huge percentage of players can't even seem to get multiplayer functionality working/
ANd the game crashes for tons of people
And it hangs for 30 seconds when you click on the bonfire
Are you INSANE
EA does not have to specifically have to be the full release
it dosen't
its the unfinished projetc
its the unfinished result bro
The game has to work and at least be functional and stable for it to be EA or it will get review bombed into oblivion.
You legit have no clue what you're talking about dude, I'm sorry
ITS AN EA
btw this, does not have to be the case btw
No dude, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying the current state of the game, yes, unstable, not ready.
Keep it cool guys or I’ll have to close this
there is so many ways to approach EA with this
no worries, I'll keep my cool
Sorry Visitrix didn't know others could see it.
Thanks guys appreciate it
I'm starting to lose my cool trying to explain someone a very complicated topic who's just being incredibly presumptive
its not hard, to provide fuctional content, then slowly and easily update the game
Yes, it is.
by adding other stuff
If it's not hard, go do it yourself.
steel raven has lol
they're working on ravenfield all by themselves and look at where they have gotten lol
The game changed direction since the last closed test, so I can understand why they would do EA first before shipping a finished product.
exactly
You're agreeing with him but he's legitimately proving most of what you've said so far wrong
There is a massive amount of techincal debt that comes with that kind of a pivot
he just said that they could do an EA which meaning an unfinished project, before finalising the game
No, he didn't...
or he atleasts understands it
Also games as judged differently when in EA and more room for improvement/annoyed with bugs is more lenient compared to a ‘polished product’. Both are judged differently
exactly
room for improvement/fixing
meaning that despite the mess it might be in, the more it can improve
Right what’s the actually disagreement as we all seem to be in agreement?
Yup, and who knows when best that their product is actually ready for early access?
And when
my stance is that "they could release EA and give us the content taht is fuctional."
"and then continue updating/fixing it
And my stance is that you don't know that better than the developers themselves.
We can’t judge though what we do not know and we have no idea of the games state outside of the demo.
true, I'm not saying Windrose is ready
You're saying they could just ship it as it is now to EA
but I'm sayng that an EA or even an announcement is not too far from being here
That's been your whole entire thing
I would say they have a lot of ‘feedback’ from the demo and it would make sense to work on that first before EA is out.
but the point of an EA is taht despite it being "fully/early released" it can recieve feedback and improvement
thast the point of an EA as well
its again not the finished project, its the early stages of an finished project
Sometimes it’s easier to collect feedback on core issues rather than open up the whole game and have a mountain of threads to go through.
Oh I'm not saying release it at all "fully"
I'm saying: "release the EA (not instantly) but keep updating it and fixing and stuff, over the course of time, so you can recieve support and feedback, etc."
meaning any "unfinished content you don't wanna add now, can be added in later"
You just have to trust that the developers will release to early access when they've received enough feedback and completed the development required for the game to be in an acceptable state for early access.
Anyway looks like we are all in agreement that we do not know the state of Windrose outside of the demo, we can’t wait for EA and would like it sooner than later. We all understand the process of EA and its pros/cons. Currently it’s roundabouts so I’m going to close this thread.