#Yvette AI !
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
BOOOOOOOO 🍅 🍅 🍅
The Lora is bad
to bad you don like 🙏 😘
and poor baby yvette gets ruined by AI smh
why cant we just draw ourselves..
Wtf is the third Yvette holding
shes holding an inconceivable blob of ai slop
you can 🙏👍 nobody forces you to tear up ! 😘
I mean. Do whatever you want, but posting it here when it clearly does not get a good reception is not a great idea
Im proud of you for specifying that its ai though, because a lot of the ai image generators don't do that at the very least
AI is good for random bullshit put together quickly. But for recreating a character that already exists in great detail, such as yvette, you will not receive very good results.
AI shouldn’t be accepted regardless of the persons intentions. It steals artwork from other artists and it is overall “art theft” if you think about it
In my personal opinion.. it ruins the characters for me. Not just because it steals artwork from other artists but also because it doesn’t get ALL the details correctly.
Yes, but like it or not its going to stay, so the best anyone who hates it can do is push for its limited use
I dont mind ai for personal use, generate images and essays all you want, but once you monetize it, then it becomes a problem
Like people using membership-locked 'official' art and putting it on a tshirt and selling it or something
Or just straight up selling ai generated imagery
Realistically, ai cant match the quality of top artists but will definitely raise the bar for artists works in general, because now ppl who want to commission art will do subpar art themselves, and for free
Its unfortunate and i know many people affected by it but if you think about it, it could in the long run increase quality of actually man made works, as well as keep absurd prices in check (not that i have a problem with paying premium for an artist whose style i personally enjoy and want to support)
Nah don’t worry, i have acknowledged that it’s staying but it’s still rather despicable that people would rather use AI that steals art from other artists than commission or try themselves; i understand that not everybody is able to afford the prices when it comes to commissioning however, there are alternative options
I personally don’t mind paying a certain amount from an artist I adore as art isn’t easy and it is extremely time consuming. Not only that but I also know that the artist is having fun and is happy as they are doing something they love, ya know? However if people continue to use AI, real life artists aren’t going to publish work otherwise it’ll be stolen to create somebody else’s “project”. AI will progress and because of that, it’ll be harder to differentiate what was created by a human and what was created by a computer
Everyone has different opinions on the use of AI and that’s fine!
???
The Lora is wrong that mean the girl is prompted out is NOT Yvette
glad you like it ☺️
I don't think he liked it op
is op delulu
just for you guys 😘
yeah i understand, i agree as well
Wish there were rules regarding AI art in "fanart" channel lol
Many of these images don't look like Yvette, please filter out the random nonsense to get better reactions.
On Discord, there are lots of protected people who unconditionally hate and harass AI art, you would have a more friendly audience at X where the protected people have less reach.
op isnt a real human I swear
@worn flicker
Why is everyone so wild because of AI
A certain political movement decided to harass AI artists (and other kinds of artists) to monopolize the freelance art industry.
because it isnt art... in a fanart channel
??? lmfao what
like that has to be bait right?
theres no way thats a real take lmfaoooo
judging from your previous hateful comments, you are a part of that movement
HAH
I don't think OP is a good artist, but I responded with building criticism instead of blind hate.
What the sigma
AI art ruins the entire digital art industry in multiple ways
- Removes actual creativity and effort
- If people don't notice, then AI art could end up replacing jobs by real artists
- Incentivizes people to not pursue art as a hobby since they can get what they want through AI (lowering the demand for real art in the process)
And all those together (with other things) create a negative feedback loop, where people make more AI images, making less people interested in human art, which leads to more AI images and so on and so forth
Thus it's important for people to point out AI so that this doesn't occur
what is "art"?
The thing that differentiates humanity from soulless automatons doing as humans tell them to
But who cares?
Even when machines learn everything and humans don't have to do it, you can still do it.
There will simply be a difference in whose hands the work was done.
Whoever needs it, he will choose the hands according to his taste, with whose hands the work he needs will be done.
In my opinion, work done by human hands will have a greater impact only if it is attributed to the work "done by human hands". And of course you need to have proof.
And the job, of course, must be perfectly done.
The issue isn't with the individuals who consume it, rather with the people who "create" and use AI art, especially in a professional setting
Also, AI art cannot express creativity to the level that human art can, even if the human artist isn't skilled, since the emotion of the artist is instilled in the creation
And the biggest issue still is that people don't want AI art to become mainstream since it takes the creativity out of whatever it is used for, ruining the medium in the process
When you commission an artist to make something you dont say "trace this and ill pay you x amount of money" because youre commissioning them to make something that doesnt exist. Ai doesnt have the capacity to create from scratch exactly as someone envisions it. People still commission artists because theres standards that need to be met in some professional cases.
Ai is a tool that is very clearly misused at the moment, and it isnt really powerful enough to verify itself in reference to all the free information on the internet. Maybe it is, but not publicly. Until it is, its just a shitty, half assed method of doing things.
The 'who cares?' Is personal preference. Some people have lower standards than others and thats okay. The quality of ai generated images is passable as art with minor errors (i say minor as in a majority of the work is visibly cohesive, and the error is one or two things the human eye can catch.)
I personally also hate the monetization of ai image generation, because even if you touch it up yourself, the core of the image was stolen from somewhere on the internet
If you want to generate ai images go for it, but putting it behind a paywall for nsfw or any reason is beyond stupid and should be regulated
But again, people will pay for stuff like that because their standards are different (usually lower)
Thank you guys. I understand this matter better now.
God, I hate that you actually keep trying to make sexualized-ish prompts with your AI garbage
Naughty spray
monopoly of what? a pencil and a notebook?
Okay that guy sounds very much like a conspiracy theorist but he's not 100% wrong. I support artists making a living off of their hobby but (as an example) when voice actors tell new, aspiring va's to not settle for less pay because they're new thats tipping the balance of a free market, inflating prices unnaturally.
love to see everyone dunkin on this
crazy thread
The last 2 don't even look like fucking Yvette 
happy you like em 😘
At this point OP is just making this art out of spite, so it'd be best if we all just stop commenting on this post altogether and ignore it
Good morning, how are you? Which one did you use? Or can't you say it?
look at her gun
just hole
Love the coloring
Grow up.
I made a NON AI post with all the current fanart that's on pixiv