- Many people don’t consider images AI generates “art” (like me)
- AI Image tools aren’t used just for art
- If you considered images AI generates “art” why wouldn’t you consider audios too.
- This will make people less confused with the real art channel
- Men :3
#Rename Ai Art channels to Ai Images
harsh stone
broken topazBOT
lusty kelp
agreed, art is too generic, ai images, or ai drawings already is more fitting
shut hull
agreed, art is too generic, ai images, or ai drawings already is more fitting
I agree with that
harsh stone
@tall walrus Any reason why not?
red ridge
It is supposed to be generic
that way it can hold more topics
listing it as images limits the conversations
harsh stone
listing it as images limits the conversations
How so?
“images” is more generic then “art”
vernal moon
Art needs intentioinaility and emotion, not digital sense.
And since AI systems are trained on existing works, it cannot transcend the real imagination of human art.
Then , it is not articulate to our ethic and authourship.
tall walrus
<@334449311188385793> Any reason why not?
i consider it art and its an unnecessary change in genral
in my server we have #ai-art and #handdrawn-art
my view is: if it looks like a chicken talks like a chicken then it's not a duck, so if it looks like art it's art.
plus i dont see a point in changing it
runic crest
No point in this ai art means ai made art.
craggy hollow
i consider it art and its an unnecessary change in genral
You considering it art means nothing
You don't get to define that
"the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power."
That's art
You considering it art is like me considering a laptop as a phone, it does the same things but is it a phone
Well it's portable?
It has apps?
Not a phone though is it
There is a clear distinction
considering AI generated content as a real art form is just weird
tall topazBOT
Ayo? @craggy hollow level 3 !!! 
craggy hollow
It should exist, I love ai and it has unlimited potential
But considering ai content as a real art form is just nahhhh
vagrant apex
I don't have a problem with people generating ai images etc just as a hobby or for fun, but it's a huge problem when companies use ai just so they don't have to pay people to work for them
By for example, using voice cloning to clone the voice of your voice actors so you don't have to pay them
Which is already happening
vagrant apex
Plus, ai art defenders are fucking stupid, I hope you don't want to lump yourself in with the same group of idiots that geniuenly think sunflower fields are made up and can only be achieved through ai
craggy hollow
W take
shy aspen
