#Where is the best place to download YouTube videos?
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
you can use ytdlp so it will download the best quality possible
orrr use https://cobalt.tools
Savefrom
Not really, you can use anything,like personally i use this which downloads both shorts and vids https://ytshorts.savetube.me/en/10
guhh cobalt is the best
awful service ...
Yea checked it seen that its for multiple services looks good
No flac
why would you need flac off of youtube
Still provides me 1080P
Ayo? @kindred zodiac level 1 !!! 
Why? This service is optional for traffic-save, provides decent quality + searching the pasted Link really fast. Although that's it. Don't ask me why I don't using other services, savedfrom is my beloved
wdym by traffic-save
It saves good quality and doesn't using high-prior
i mean cobalt.tools saves in high quality too
I mean donwload speed is saving traffic, by setting protocol by-low
looks nicer too
Okay I'll try your service too
Yeah that's the thing, I don't have the bandwidth for that
Now, if you have time to try cmd, yt-dlp is pretty quick with this command to grab audios:
yt-dlp --extract-audio --audio-format wav <Insert yt link here>
why would u need flac off of youtube if youtube compresses it
youre not gaining any quality
That's awful
Cuz FLACs are compressed WAVs
i knoooooww but youtube compresses audio anyway you dont need flac
cobalt might just be downloading the audio in m4a and just converting it to flac
which makes like no difference
Ayo? @long forum level 61 !!! 
except it makes the file bigger
Flac will still be smaller than WAV that's the point
No
flac is overkill for audio from youtube
Mp3 and ogg are lossy formats
personally i download in ogg
U still give away quality
its literally lossy anyway
i dont see ur point
Yes but u will degrade the quality even more
i think youtube stores audio in like 256 kbps
U have an m4a file and u turn that into an mp3, that compresses again
so if you download as mp3 it actually does not matter
Check the cut off rates
well then just download m4a
U don't know how they store each file so u can never be too sure
Where did m4a cut off
Does*
Cut off range
Like
20khz
NoTube. I recommend
no
Then?
then no point in wanting flac either ..
Yeah so same applies to WAV right
mhm
yes
no
it does
you put it in flac / wav because EVERY time you reencode as a lossy format, you suffer more compression loss
like when you save a jpeg
and then screenshot it
and save it as a jpeg
over and over and over
depends
lotta times yt dl'ers dont actually trip the high bitrate thingy
like, you can use stacher, and set it to download m4a
and it will visibly be worse quality on a spectro vs just, using the flac toggle in the first place
below
or above rather
opus is a codec, ogg is a container
but my point of telling people to download flacs
is to minimize extra-shittification from reencoding into lossy codecs, repeatedly
mikus
you literally fukin play gartic phone
its the same concept if you download an mp3, then edit it, and save it as an mp3
its gonna progressively get shittier
Is this shitpost chat
no
cobalt lets u download m4a tho...
https://stacher.io/ also, simpler
especially since you can set up auto archival
and if you use stacher, and click flac or wav, it will download best AAC, and then transcode it on the spot using ffmpeg
not talking about rn, talking in general u goofball
Thank u felt 
I will but I'm at school atm
We'll see
What ur saying is true but recoding it to a FLAC doesnt do any harm. Is it pointless? Indeed it is. However FLAC is lossless, therefore no quality is lost nor gained. The same goes for WAV also, all the details and such are preserved but doesn't really help either just like FLAC. The only difference is that it's uncompressed. it won’t degrade the quality, but it won’t improve it either. Downloading as FLAC or WAV will just make the file size larger, without adding any benefits. It’s like putting a low-resolution image in a high-resolution frame. The image will still look the same, but the frame will take up more space.
thats my point
Yes mia, u have expanded my horizons. Thank u 
ur welcom
So technically. We download m4a and we happi
Cuz Its pointless afterwards
No?
Okay so we do that. No need to recode the download
i have educated the lead qc... now i will definitely get model master...
I dont doubt it, I just need ur models to be good
no
the purpose of dunking it into flac or wav, is to not suffer transcoding losses
if you take an mp3, open it, resave it as an mp3
repeat, it will keep getting progressively worse
AAC is still lossy
stacher
zero ads, and, more features
you could literally use stacher as an auto downloader for all your youtube subscriptions
and have a cache
if youre fine with downloading programs then ytdl or stacher
stacher is ytdl
except, gui that is understandable to 99% of people
which is why i recommend it
There are more ytdl gui's im just giving both names of the thing
yes i just like stacher because, least annoying
its bloaty in install size, besides that, pretty much does anything you could want
including only downloading sections of a vid, then dunking to flac
ease of changing which folder it downloads to
background throttling, yt throttling bypasses
whole nine
No like. Download as m4a, (og format from yt) do ur editing n stuff and then output It as flac or wav
I'm not saying export it as the same codec
Only download it as that and then u can do all the re coding n such
But since u know, it's original stored format is m4a, why not download it as that so that it's faster n such to download
Same here lmfao
u do realize all those DL'ers
download as M4A, then, ffmpeg to flac
there is no "downloading the flac"
youtube does not store flacs
where do you think the flac comes from
I don't think u understand what I'm saying...
What I'm saying is
no
what you are saying is, you are skipping the 2 nano seconds it takes to ffmpeg an m4a
Wait lemme
So yt stores m4a
Right?
So there is no point in downloading it as flac or wav since it's just re coding and nothing more correct?
it downloads m4a, and saves in flac
Yee that
this saves you the chance of the end user being brain dead
So no point
and "exporting"
without changing
which, by default in audacity
chooses the source codec
Okay so it doesn't matter
so
if you literally want to save 5% of your time, and, 20% of your hdd, to just
have to click 4 more buttons every time you export the first time after editing, sure
be my guest
again
if you download
m4a
or flac
IT DOWNLOADS
THE SAME AMOUNT
AND THE SAME FILE
FFMPEG
IS DONE ON YOUR CPU
LOCALLY
NO INTERNET
you are lead QC litsa

im going to danny devito christmas tree
I didn't know how said services work
thats why i explained it here
Doesn't mean I don't understand codecs
😭
since ur here, why do spikes appear when coverting to flac? is it bit depth related?
online ffmpeg 
this is what i mean btw
that is clipping
Clipping is a form of waveform distortion that occurs when an amplifier is overdriven and attempts to deliver an output voltage or current beyond its maximum capability. Driving an amplifier into clipping may cause it to output power in excess of its power rating.
In the frequency domain, clipping produces strong harmonics in the high-frequency ...
i see i see, and the cause?
again
different bit depth
?
from the og?
Yes thank u. I got a very similar answer when googling so thanks for confirming 
Thank you all. My problem has been resolved.
Recap please 
User asked for ways to dl youtube videos, get recommended a couple of sites/programs, and an "argument" on the correct audio format to download
It wasn't an argument we were just discussing
No drama took place
there is no "bloat" in adding a script to quickly download all models a user would want
Well, script was purely copy & paste commands before
Also, infer-web is bigger as there are more cells. Maybe not "far worse" but same-ish code quality, neither is better
I need to sleep anyway
yes but afaik python is top to bottom, and, anyone who brazenly wants to GPT it, the more slammed into one script, the harder it is
and before the "GPT it" is questioned, that is how everything started with kalo
dithering can cause clipping in rare scenarios, and doesn't matter if the individual didn't raise volume or not if their original source material already reaches 0 dB or some crackhead gain
and, ive still had izo clip when using their resampler, which, has a built in limiter, even if using saracon and sub -3 peak



