How to balance the benefits of Pass users, Design and Plug-in market?

[pseudo carbon]

At this stage, pass card users have extremely high income rights. Not only can the public rights of the robot be leased in exchange for greater profits due to its monopoly status, but the card itself as a property right will have a lot of room for appreciation.

But as workflow designers, they have the design ability to transform needs, which is the core of bot's productivity performance. This part of the ability will be called a self-protection barrier.
The plug-in market will appear in the form of added value, such as a tts of a hot IP in the market, and the added value will be more effective in marketing.

Try to make a judgment. An excellent and popular bot should have the ability to upgrade productivity (improve efficiency) in real life. This requires discussing the issue of demand chain.
LLM's capabilities are limited, so it can only solve problems in stages based on requirements, and then connect them together to form a workflow to improve productivity.

What needs to be considered is the workflow design capability, which has a long-term and effective competitive core, and then selects suitable plug-ins in the plug-in market based on the needs of different scenarios throughout the demand chain.

But the problem is, all of this is based on one premise - having permission to publish.
Therefore, pass card owners do not need the above two abilities, or they are waiting for the opportunity. When a really hot bot is recognized by the market, workflow design capabilities will be in extreme demand.

But the two are not of the same status. Pass cards will always take precedence over workflow to enjoy higher returns. Because of the nature of land ownership, it will eventually be discovered that a batch of leases with pass card permissions will be released in the market.
Of course, this requires a complete revenue sharing mechanism. I personally think that pass cards should give benefits to workflow designers, because their own property rights enjoy this added value.

At the same time, there will also be some pass card users who use pass cards to achieve revenue performance, or there will be a large number of pass card owners, which will affect the balance of economic development of the entire platform, which will involve finance.

But what is the significance of the plug-in market? As a TTS, I think it has a very strong marketing significance. Try to think of Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.) waking you up, learning math with you, solving psychological dilemmas for you, etc. The characters and voices will provide text for everyone. As for the tone, it is a kind of human warmth.

So when talking about the above plug-ins, you will find that the plug-in market should form a capability matrix in response to demand, such as what necessary performances a role should have. This will create great opportunities for the plug-in market.

The benefit of the plug-in market is more that the marginal cost is relatively low. It only exists as a certain part of the demand chain and is a manifestation of the means of production. The workflow designer is the one who actually forms the product.
But how should the benefits be distributed? This is a big question worth discussing.
If productivity is anchored, but the benefits brought by productivity performance are not as high as the value-added feedback of the pass card itself, it will eventually fall into a dangerous situation. Everyone is looking forward to the emergence of excellent bots, but no one will develop and promote them.
The same is true for the performance of the plug-in market. If the revenue performance does not exceed the value-added performance of the pass card property rights, this will not be conducive to promoting excellent products.

[uneven urchin]

Hey man have you checked their latest tokenomics, now it's even more interesting I also shared a post in which I will share my findings in this new system.

[pseudo carbon]

wow, I must go and read it

[uneven urchin]

Indeed, they have incorporated a new sector introducing the concept of "patronage". Together with your explanation of the "workflow", all this truly shed light on the novelty this project brings LMAO

[pseudo carbon]

Yes! This sponsorship will give the entire economic system great flexibility. The choice of sponsorship also depends on the analysis of platform user types and market feedback. Although AI creation encourages innovation, the market only recognizes improvements and changes in production efficiency, or in other words, socially necessary labor hours. exchange

[weak jewel]

Very thoughtful, just saw the official tweet and community discussion post about it. You've given me more interesting perspectives again with this post, thanks!

[uneven urchin]

Correct, at least the project itself and what it's trying to build shall be "useful", or else it's totally scam

[weak jewel]

Looking forward to the day when productivity and relations of production change

[pseudo carbon]

I believe that AI will dominate this change, and it is inevitable, but at the same time, we also need to think about a question: how to define its necessity. I think I can find some time to sort out my design ideas for AI products. I have initially The judgment is the merging of scenes