#A negative Invisible Joker should make a negative copy
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
literally unplayable
Frankly, this is such a niche interaction, and you're trading a negative for a negative, that I think it should be implemented
Yep
I don't think it makes sense, and it's not intuitive.
but it would feel fantastic, so I'm in.
Maybe generally he could keep the edition but I'm not sure?
fym not intuitive
what do you think people will intuitively think would happen when a negative invisible COPIES a polychorme joker?
this suggestion causes it to copy the target imperfectly and differently from normal, where the edition of the invisible is usually meaningless.
True but still 6/5 feels weird
maybe invis should only apply its edition if the targetted joker has none
Yeah but it doesn't fix the 6/5 problem every time
yeah but like for sake of consistency
mm
I mean you got also do the opposite
any edition from invis takes priority over the targetted joker
Sorry what ?