#Quantum Entanglement (rare)
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I think it should be Uncommon and be a 100% chance so it's simpler
Although I see how that takes away from the quantum theming
Oh you're doing like a Schrodinger's Cat thing
Yeah that's what quantum Entanglement is
The machine in entangled with the decaying atom and the cat in entangled to the mechine
Yeah
Only upon observing (opening the pack) will you know
I really like the theming I got i just dont know of ots actually good
Never designed a passive
how about just
"half of all jokers in packs are perishable"
because 50% isnt always 1 in every 2
I mean that probably works ballance wise
But like its not half of all cats in boxes are dead
Its pretty much* rng
But its probably mechanically better that way
true
definitely mechanically better
but i agree that its less thematic that way
Yeah exactly
It definitely doesn't feel the same even if ot does make this actually usable
What if it was an Uncommon and it was "Each Buffoon Pack has a 1 in 2 chance to contain a Rare Perishable Joker"
That or "Each Joker in Buffoon Packs has a 1 in 2 chance to be a Rare Perishable Joker" (Not sure which is more balanced)
What if it was just any card from any pack has a 1 in 2 chance to be a rare perishable joker /s
I guess but then the highs are lower