#Pythagorean - $8 Common
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Yeah good idea
it gains 3 mult?
Yeah
Like, scaling?
You probably should put 3,4 or 5
Because the wording
Whole point of a pythagorean triple is that those three should be there
Hmmmm
Well I guess the multi should be bigger then
Hmmm….
Actually how about 12 Multi?
Oh you just changed it to that
Yeah now it seems stable
+12 seems like way too much
I think +6 would be better, and that ties into the theme since that would be the area of such a triangle
A 12 mult scaler is insane for a common
Also make it Uncommon I think
Even if it locks into a low-straight- you only need to proc it a few times then focus on Xmult
It should because it seems like it would be up there with something like fibonacci
Y’all forgot flushes to proc
do they have to score?
bc if not you could do two pair 3's and 4's and throw in a 5, or any other combination; or pair and throw in the other two