#Mathematical Fallacy
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
if like said above ^^, why would that be useful
No the 5 can also be treated like a 5
I said "also"
-# More evidence that balatro players can't read /j
It will adapt to the highest played hand type basically
For example
You could technically create a 5 of a kind
74256 would make a pair?
This sounds like quantum ranks which probably won't be implemented
Yeah, unless you put the order it as a straight and put the 2 at the end
what?
the card order doesn't change the hand
and it isn't a straight, missing a 3
and what would putting the 2 at the end do that the 6 doesn't
So basically because the last card is 4 the 2 basically becomes a 3 to complete a straight
so this joker raises the rank, not matches it?
396?
a) 6 -> 8
b) 6 -> 7
c) 6 -> 9
369?
d) 9 -> 10
e) 9 -> 6
f) 9 -> 5
which ones?
a) if played a straight
c) if no Straight (pair)
e) No straight (pair)
f) if played as a straight
The fact any of these questions were asked is an immediate nope
Wild ranks
I understand what you're going for i think, but its wayy too roundabout in wording- no Joker should be that unclear
I should probably rephrase lol
It basically changes the last Card number best suited for the played hand
Is that a better explanation
The point of a Mathematical Fallacy is to say that something equals something else when it does not
For example does 2 = 5
Isn't a fallacy specifically something untrue but believable
its kinda cool but confusing ngl
Probably better as a modded joker
"Ranks of final two scored cards in hand are equivalent"?