#Zweihänder (uncommon)

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

vale bough
#

Gains X0.2 when a Two Pair with a 5th card is played. Destroys the not scoring card. [Currently X1 Mult]

Maybe some numbers gotta be tweaked?
Is it too limiting to be Two Pair only?

page-of-swords-3267580127.jpg
#

That picture is Page of Swords from the Smith-Waite Tarot set. Obviously should get some jimbo make up done

sleek rapids
#

I like it

full topaz
#

Sounds good

terse grotto
safe blaze
#

Hm, I think it's a little strong for an uncommon. Destroying a card is already a big ability, like how Trading Card lets you destroy a card per round using a Discard. This could theoretically let you destroy a card for every hand you play, and gain XMult from doing so.

#

I'd say remove either destroying the card or gaining XMult. Or reduce XMult gained.

molten garnet
#

I think it could do without the xMult. We already have a joker that scores +Mult off of two pairs (and by extension full houses)

#

And yes I would up the rarity of this one as well

#

Normally I dislike joker concepts where they destroy cards in a played hand but this is kinda cool

vale bough
# safe blaze Hm, I think it's a little strong for an uncommon. Destroying a card is already a...

Trading Card lets you destroy any card, as long as it's the first and only discard.
For this joker to be able to destroy a card, it needs to be a non-scoring 5th card. So a full house doesn't trigger it. Neither does stone. So it's not all that easy to kill a card with it.
And the xMult only scales when you play a 5th card with your Two Pair. So the only way to scale it further in the long run is stone cards

#

It's much more tricky to get full value out of it and that's why I see it as an uncommon

safe blaze
#

That's fair

sleek rapids
#

The only change I'd maybe make

#

Is allowing FH by checking for a hand containing two pair and 5 cards.

#

And that's just because letting it work with fullhouse doesn't cost much balance wise since you're still burning a rank you want

#

Not a neccesary change, but one that opens it up w/o breaking it IMO

cold tiger
#

I think it's definitely over juiced by being both card removal and scaling xmult

#

"If played hand is a Two Pair and contains a non-scoring card, this Joker gains X0.2 Mult and destroys the non-scoring card. (Currently X1 Mult)" i think would be the most vanilla wording

#

saying a fifth card makes this Joker have contradictions with splash and stone cards

cold tiger
fathom bay
#

This would be fun two mess around with. If you don't have a build around 2pair then it's a risk reward system, either you score points or you destroy a card. Getting too greedy will kill you

Also, if you get this early game then it's probably gonna be a more expensive trading card, for more deckfixing.

Beautiful idea. He cooked

solar loom
#

Chicot incident where no one knows how to pronounce it right

#

(btw Chicot is pronounced “She-koo)

vale bough
fathom bay
solar loom
#

aw