#Loose Cannon - Common
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Thematically fits with wilds being well⊠wild: smth that carries inherently inconsistent connotations
I like this idea as long as the range is tweaked. Maybe smth like 20 - 40?
âŠdo you uno?
But anyway thereâs multiple ways to interpret it
Why is this winmore
I think that reaction means the numbers should be tweaked?
Wilds are supposed to beâŠwild
What do you think they should be tweaked to?
so it *could *give 0
maybe a guaranteed 20 or 30 would justify it instead of just plain rng
i'm not a fan of rng chips
bloodstone is bad enough already
If it was guaranteed then itâs just worse scary face
then why did u make this dawg
Because itâs not guaranteed?
it's rng based and it has a large chance of being worse than SCARY FACE
My fault for trying to make something
well you can't just give an idea that even you aren't 100% sure is a great idea
Iâm not sitting in my room for hours deciding on what suggestion for the game I should make
At that point Iâd just make my own mod
Yes you can, itâs called constructive criticism from other people
i'm saying that ur idea is bad because rng is not good for chips. bloodstone is bad because of rng. this is bad BECAUSE OF RNG.
You have a point but I feel like bloodstone wouldnât be so bad if ancient joker didnât exist
plus ancient joker pairs well with wild cards without rng, making something pair with wild cards that has rng is bad.
Well my whole thought process was âooh letâs make wild cards even more wildâ but I went about it the wrong way
đ
Why is Cavendish beefing with someone named "Mr put it on"
because this joker is buns and we have beef so we made a burger
this isnt winmore-
winless