Inkwell,Bloodshed,fore,kite

[atomic valley]

Inkwell

Has a 1 in 4 chance to turn card into spade version of said cards. The cards played if one was turned into one would not lose seals or the enhancement. Common joker 4 dollars.
(name idea from obelisk saves).

Bloodshed

Has a 1 in 4 chance to turn card into heart version of said cards. The cards played if one was turned into one would not lose seals or the enhancement. Common joker 4 dollars (name idea from dapper gentlemann).

Fore

Has a 1 in 4 chance to turn card into club version of said cards. The cards played if one was turned into one would not lose seals or the enhancement. Common joker 4 dollars.

Kite

Has a 1 in 4 chance to turn card into diamond version of said cards. The cards played if one was turned into one would not lose seals or the enhancement. Common joker 4 dollars (name idea from weather).

[cursive spruce]

i think it should be 1/4

[visual meadow]

1/10 is crazy bad

[faint violet]

seems good for flushes

which flushes are bad

but flush houses and flush fives are really good

so idk this isn't bad

if i have an extra joker slot, ill take this

[obtuse bolt]

$4 Common that has a 25% to spade each card played. Doesn't sound too bad actuallt

Should come with a sister joker that does the same to Hearts

I'd probably call it "bloodshed" or something along those lines

[atomic valley]

I was thinking about creating cards for all suits I’m just primarily stuck on names but you just helped me with one

[visual meadow]

At 1/10 it definitely is

[faint violet]

well its changed

[visual meadow]

Your argument implies Joker isn't bad, since well, if you have the additional slot it'd help

[visual meadow]

Thats fair tbh

Myb

[faint violet]

since its deck fixing and not scoring, its easier for it to be not overtuned and just overall usefull

its like 8 ball

[solid python]

Tbh I’d much rather have 8 ball over this if we’re comparing it to that

This is only useful for making flushes, and I don’t think adding 4 of these jokers to the pool will help much. Flushes need scoring to be usable, not deck fixing, and any tarot generator can still help make flushes

[visual meadow]

That still doesn't matter under the prospect of 1/10, which is the concept i sent that with

(Because it's insanely undertuned in that version)

I did apologize since, like ya said, it was changed

[faint violet]

I had the same thought when making the comparison

[atomic valley]

Leaky pen,Bloodshed,fore

[warm schooner]

wheres the diamond one

?

[visual meadow]

Fuck diamonds

[warm schooner]

i think this is just kinda eh

has really similar utility to the suit tarots

i can only see this being used to like

convert kings or smth into hearts

or just convert a specific card into hearts

for blodostone

but because of the 1/4 chance id much rahter just find sun instead of wasitng a joker slot for an effect which might take a while for me to get

[atomic valley]

About diamonds I just don’t know what the names for diamonds would be

[tender perch]

Diamond in the rough

[atomic valley]

I like it but it’s pretty lengthy

[solid python]

Rough gem already has that reference

[tender perch]

Pointy edge?

[atomic valley]

Possibly but it might also just be a little to broad

[warm schooner]

Kite

[atomic valley]

I love it!

Leaky pen,Bloodshed,fore,kite

[regal condor]

Maybe the spade one could be renamed to "Inkwell" (keeps theming while staying in line with the other one-word names)

[warm schooner]

isle 1

[atomic valley]

Fair point not to mention leaky pen is just kind of basic compared to the rest

Inkwell,Bloodshed,fore,kite

[subtle inlet]

The wording is overly lengthy, you can just say "change the suit", it is implied that the card is otherwise unchanged.

Example: Inkwell
Played cards have a 1 in 4 chance to change their suit to spades when scored.

Much more concise and avoids ambiguity with when the joker is triggered.

The suit modification jokers could also be changed to use a 1 in 3 chance and still be fairly weak.

[true bloom]

Thats what I thougth

And also. It's inkwell hell

[tired peak]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zh7QlgAZiuI

Dubious programmer art.

[tired sorrel]

The concept is neat but I feel having four is rather a lot of bloat; changing it to be one joker that has a 1 in 4 chance to convert card's suits to that of the suit you have most of in your deck would be cool I think

(if all equal, randomly pick one)

[manic gulch]

Or change the suit to the same suit of the first scored card.
So this doesn't work with high card (unless splash)

[earnest spindle]

I actually really like it, it's a simple idea, not broken, with some synergies

[visual meadow]

Thats worthy of a rare thoigh

Since it allows you to double down on deckfixing you already have- not whatever deckfixing corresponds to the joker you find

[manic gulch]

A joker that only changes the suit of a card sounds like the effect of an uncommon, not a rare

[tired sorrel]

True but adding 4 more jokers like this that are all so similar seems like a bit of bloat

[visual meadow]

Ehh, when it changes 25% of what you play to your most desired suit, there's an argument

[visual meadow]

I didnt disagree

I simply said if it's based off [most of suit in deck] it'd be too strong