#Gamba
1 messages Ā· Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I am not gambling money on the game so I donāt think it would classify without that
I am of two minds about it. It doesn't have real money gambling mechanics, but does have elements of risk, depictions of gambling and themes of other gambling games. I could see either way
I donāt think the game even contains gambling as a theme
Apart from being themed around poker, I wouldn't say anything in the game is anything related to gambling in the traditional sense
There is no indication in game that you are risking money in game to play
you're overthunking this one, no gambling to worry about
If ārisk/rewardā mechanics are enough to make a game a gambling game then the category wouldnāt really mean much cuz basically every game would fit š
Any game with lootboxes is way more of a gambling game than Balatro by a long shot lol
Some people do consider it gambling even if it's related to a gambling game, see this on Luck be a Landlord
https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/-i-luck-be-a-landlord-i-gets-evicted-from-13-countries-on-google-play-store
I think it would be defined as a gambling game if there was in game currencies involved, such that youād bet a certain amount on a run and youād gain/lose that currency based on the results of your run.
But this game doesnt have any of that so i wouldnāt categorize it as a gambling game.
Not that it's correct, or that I agree with it. But it being related to poker/using dollars in game might push it to 'gambling' for some people
yeah having a game with a poker theme and money involved might make it look like a gambling game
i see your point but slots and your LBAL game i would suggest is more directly associated with gambling. where'as Bala doesn't actually even pose as a poker game in some ways
I think LBAL is definitely more explicitly gambling than Balatro, since the main mechanic is a slot machine, personally balatro feels a lot more like a strategy game
It's not a gambling game it's a chance game.
Nothing about poker is inherently gambling
i think that on the outside the game can be seen as a gambling game, it really depends on how you see it first i guess. i first heard of this game from a friend as a poker-themed roguelike so i had an idea of how the game would be.
I played poker with my friends without money and I wouldnāt call that gambling
People can gamble on any game
This is more of a question on optics than mechanics I suppose, you all understand how a game themed around poker might be considered related to gambling
Dan is anti gambling for example and his game has nothing to do with it
So am I
Yeah but since you don't bet anything I wouldn't say it's about gambling
Some stuck up people that donāt understand games or nuance could call Balatro a gambling game, sure
Oh did I not mention you can now buy Gems for $2.99 for more hands?
[SARCASM]
If you used the dollars you have to bet then I'd say its more of a gambling game but since you always win money even if you don't bet anything yourself then I'd argue its not necessarily gambling
What about Wheel of Fortune?
that's guaranteed to miss and you know it
Y'all still buy it š
WoF is like, the closest thing to gambling the game has
Reluctantly š
Oh yeah Wheel of Fortune is what separates cold blooded strategic players with true sigma gamblers
But even then itās consigned to a single tarot and has an effect separate from the āmainā gameplay loop
99% of Balatro players don't waste their last 3 dollars on wheel of fortune just when they're about to get 1.5 mult joker
Itās entirely possible you wonāt even see it once in a run
What about the reroll button?
That's kinda like a slot machine in a way, hoping for a hit
To be fair I don't use it unless I have more than 25 dollars
I always think I can get something else in the next shop
I do it until I'm in financial ruin
i see that as a very general game mechanics i wouldnt see that and call it gambling
Is the D6 in isaac a slot machine?
Isaac has literal slot machines but I donāt think people would call it a gambling game
i was literally just thinking about that lol
Gambling addiction sigma grindset
You don't pay money for it so it feels further away
Look I'm playing devil's advocate
I think there are some arguments to calling it a gambling game
Btw @edgy cosmos can I ask you to really important lore related question here even if it isn't related to the theme of this thread?
Agree, lots of games have shop rerolls
Also I like your pfp pizzacat :)
thank you š
Are Odd Tod and Even Steven friends? They look like they would be the bestest of friends.
My week just got a thousand times better.
in my mind, the thing that separates gambling from simple risk-taking is that gambling is designed to be destructive while risk-taking is meant to be constructive
overall i think most of the gambling game accusations are just going to come up caus its poker themed
I associated it more with losing at gambling might mean you can't afford to buy groceries
Like whenever I get even Steven or Odd Tod I always think about getting the other so they are together and they can enjoy some quality bro time together.
I donāt think strategy + luck = gambling.
In my mind risk taking means that if you take a risk, you might come out worse but you'll probably end up better off if you win. And gambling is a small chance of getting something but you'll probably just get nothing.
Not a gambling game but I do find myself saying....okay just one more š
It's about as much of a gambling game as Kirby: Planet Robobot is (they depicted a casino games!!!!)
This is definitely more of a legal kneejerk than colloquialism
I don't think this game is any more of a gamble than a run of the mill roguelike
Is it gambling? No - by definition gambling needs money in.
Is it a depiction of gambling? That's a more complicated questionn, and I personally would lean towards yes
Poker is (legally) gambling, and the game is a depiction of a fantasy version of poker. It doesn't feature gambling but depicts gambling and gambling themes, even if you can't gamble in the game itself
Poker is legally gambling? According to whom?
There is a literal casino in early Pokemon games. Nobody considers them gambling games.
If you do not spend money on Poker how is it gambling
I can see how it could be at least aesthetically themed around gambling. Poker cards, chips, $$$, Wheel of Fortune, etc...
Honestly, every 'roguelite' could be considered in some way a gamble, cuz every run could be a success or a loss.
You can do what sports gambling sites do and say its "A Game of Skill"
IRL poker is gambling (if youāre playing for money). Balatro is poker-themed but itās not really poker, the only real similarities are the hands and the ability to discard. Thereās no betting.
The closest things to gambling are wheel of fortune and skipping blinds for a chance at shop items, which only affect the current run.
anything is gambling if you risk money based on the outcome
you can gamble on sports or horse racing. That does not mean sports or horse racing are inherently gambling
The tldr is poker is gambling because you bet money in it
so no money = not gambling
By that metric Balantro isn't gambling (as there's no real or between-runs money or currency involved) but it does feature gambing themes (poker)
I suppose but like, at that point you could say blackjack isn't gambling and that gambling on blackjack is gambling
But yes, we agree the game isn't gambling
a weird poll to make mr thunk, i doubt that people there would say that its a gambling game, but that doesnt help with the reason you are making this poll anyway
my friends say I have a gambling addiction with this game but my 56.4 hours of playtime would disagree. im perfectly normal in comparison to most of you guys.
so if you saying this game is a gambling machine is equivalent to saying Uno is a gambling game (yes/s)
firm believer that the poker aspect of the game is not portray like real poker and use it as a vessel to enhance the roguelike aspects of the game than actual poker itself
It's a "push your luck" game, not really gambling. To me, gambling is trying to win something of value. The chips disappear the second you win, you're not really winning the chips. To be honest, the shop money you win after doesn't even have much to do with the gambling itself imo
The closest thing to gambling is the Wheel of Fortune tarot card imho
1 in X chance next shop will card a prismatic joker
Changed my vote, Balatro is definitely a gambling game. You can gamble everywhere, gamble on getting a better hand, gamble on your packs, gamble on the shop having a 1/5 chance of a negative joker, gamble on your lucky cards.
gamble is betting money
you do not bet real life money in balatro
chance is not gambling, otherwise every game ever that has any randomness is gambling
fukc
enough talky, good sir
Gambling is just choosing to bet no? If you bet on an outcome thatās gambling. I bet that wheel of fortune is gonna be worth it, I bet that Iām not gonna need to win this blind and instead Iām gonna get 15 after beating the boss blind. Itās not chance because you make a choice to bet on an outcome.
Thereās the also the risk-reward of gambling. If I bet on a horse to win in a horse race, Iām gambling. Same in Balatro, Iām betting that what I get out of skipping a blind is worth it
so every single game with any chance is gambling?
my good sir you are straight up warping the definition of gambling
No chance is just a factor. The choice to bet is the gambling
I mean you donāt have to bet money to gamble. In a dumb example Iāve bet candy on an outcome in a game cause I had no money
you can phrase "betting on something" on anything in chance in other games
"I'm betting this property will pay off in the long run in Monopoly, so it is a gambling game."
"I'm betting building that building infrastructure will pay off in the long run in Civ, so Civ is a gambling game"
but we aren't betting anything in Balatro? so how does that make sense
unless you count "spending an ingame resource" as "betting" in which case, you would have to agree with my previous examples
I mean life is a gamble, thatās a common phrase Iāve heard many times. You gamble with your life when you drive a car. Itās a gamble in civ when you chose to prioritize iron over pottery
if you use that definition of gamble, then literally every game is a gambling game, so that is not a useful definition to use
it has no meaning to ask whether balatro is a gambling game if you consider any game where you can have any input to be a gambling game
it is the same as asking if balatro is a game
That is not the gambling that is meant by the question
The other aspect of why is the art style of Balatro. Like itās designed to look like a casino, so it falls into gambling.
Also I just thought of this but Balatro has predetermined outcomes- if you pick the same seed and the same jokers youāll get the same cards drawn. Thatās the same thing thatās on slot machines, outcomes are predetermined, and you can see what the chances of the payout is on the machine
well arguing that the aesthetic makes it a gambling game by theming is a completely different line of reasoning, and is much more reasonable
however the seed argument is not one I would use. I would not consider all games with seeds to be gambling at all. In fact, predetermining the outcome is the antithesis of gamling. If you know what is going to happen, you aren't gambling anymore
it has really nothing to do with slot machines
gamble my in-game money away for a chance at a good card