It’s like working with hot glass: it can take any shape during the first few prompts, but once it cools, it’s stuck. If the conversation shifts, Gemini keeps forcing those early concepts back in, trying to make that initial "shape" relevant to new topics where it doesn't belong.
It feels heavily optimized for one-shot prompts where every chat is disposable. For every new topic, you basically have to build context from scratch.
This wouldn't be a problem if the memory system worked as intended. But right now, it feels completely out of my control. It claims to save things, yet when I open a new instance, it’s still relying on the same old stuff I saved months ago—nothing new actually sticks.
The dream of a "Universal Assistant" feels very far away. The memory system just feels like two extra layers of "System Instructions" with cool names—a gimmicky solution rather than real innovation. It’s essentially just a static table of "If/Then" logic. Even worse, when it finally decides to use that table, it circles back to the first problem: trying to force-fit everything to my profession or favorite series, even when I’m talking about something totally unrelated.
TL;DR
My suggestion on that big rant, is:
either; the problem is how the Gemini App itself surrounding the models feed it the context, and it needs to be changed;
or give even more clear instructions on what the "Personal context" means. I'm actively trying to use them, but they seem to either degrade the outputs or they are completely ignored in certain scenarios.
(Or the problem is that the models still unable to discern nuance)