#beta-ptr-spoilers
1 messages ยท Page 388 of 1
You has ashenvale now
they have done nothing with him recently, except invite the highmountain in
no
๐
I would rather play alliance as my main, then EVER see Gally as warchief
The thought of those chins in charge....
```Her actions still have the Horde's best interests in mind, the scary and amoral part is just how ruthless and merciless she is about it.````
LAWL
oh man, they legit cant stop
Just like you can't stop 
sylvanas literally could kill azeroth herself and eveyone on the planet = she didnt do nuthin
Again I like Baine as a character, but I think he would be a horrible warchief,
As for Belf Leader... well, that is not a fun idea
Lor'themar Theron is fine
Oh I am sure he would be a fine warchief, but I don't think it would go over well
Nooo
I would roll with it, but the idea of a Belf leading the horde, i would not like it
Maybe we dont have a warchief
A belf leading the horde, at least to me, would be like the gnomes leading the alliance instead of the manboy
it just sounds wrong
Let's call it Council of the 10 warchiefs
Council of the Horde
Sylvanas + Saurfang + Baine + Lorthemar + Gallywix + Ji Firepaw + Thalyssra + Mayla + 2 new allied races leaders
gally goes bankrupt, jumps off a mountain
ya xD
Sylvanas is far more evil
Frm day 1 she's been evil...
its serious mental gymnastics going on with the sylvansa fanbois
Gallywix was a slave master for a short time
they are olympic gymnastics now
technically all capitalists are
Wtb socialist elf
Gally blew up a volcano, almost sold his race into slavery, and is lusting after the blood of the world(not just wanting, full on deadly sin here)
Is EU part 2 tomorrow ? or Thursday?
Tomorrow
There is 16 hours between US and EU Reset
HUE HUE HUE
tailsen's videomakes me laugh
"GREYMANE'S FORCES HOLD THIS WARDEN TOWER BREAK THEIR RANKS! SHOW NO MERCY!"
"MALFURION STORMRAGE MUST DIE!"
AN ILLUSION?! WHAT ARE YOU HIDING....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U09AR6WotpY Why is this only about horde ๐ก
The Horde have pushed through Ashenvale, leaving a trail of destruction in their wake. Now, the Alliance can only hope to hold off the Hordeโs continued marc...
arthas was morally grey
until he stepped foot in northrend
that's when he went full villain
and became a lot less interesting tbh
ya
Is Bolvar morally grey atm?
stratholme is a GREAT example of morally grey situation
Yea. Where in Stratholme, yes it was a horrific thing that Arthas did
and he knew it
but he had to do it.
yup
Because Uther was a hoe
"I'm not sorry for what I did, but I am sorry I had to do it."
careful arthas, ur not my arthas yet arthas
I hope they find a way to kill Turalyon on BFA
:O
Tf are you into
He's blind, with the light things
but he' snot anymore
oh no, ur gonna make me argue with vris about the light
Xe'ra is dead
The yellow eyes things, are not what I meant, he still think the same way
i mean, up to this point, all he's shown is that he's had faith and was fighting the war to save the universe from the legion
That doesn't make him blind
^
That's why he's ridiculous
agreed
Clearly he's not blind because ya know
why?
HE DIDN'T KILL ILLIDAN
he NEEDED faith
for killing that is essentially his god
to fight for 1000s of years
a losing war
losing friends, allies, planets, so on
u need faith in something to keep going
Better than anyone of ur heroes and trash waifus
and he had the light
Like if that happend to Tyrande
I love how Velen's character changed with Illidan presence. Turalyon is just an "old velen" now
no he's not
Velen's only changed to not put 100% complete faith in the light
Pls stop before they roast u
ya, velen is just now more open minded
he doesn't have complete faith in the light to guide them
he hasnt given up on the light in any way
he just wants them to help
he's still a priest as well
I know he didn't lose faith on the light, but it's actually interesting to open his eyes to another vision, instead of 100% light. I loved how they made this happen. Turalyon is just the old Velen now, nothing interesting
No he isn't
He's not 100% on light
otherwise
HE'D HAVE KILLED ILLIDAN
how is that not getting through
if he was 100% light, he'd be against alleria
Things with Alleria are just because he trust her, and he trust when she said she can control the void. Doesn't change anything for his or his vision
and there's nothing wrong with being 100% light btw
the light itself doesnt do anything
can we regard the morally grey thing? im sick of that meme
,,,
also
I didn't say it was wrong, just not interesting at all
No
i hate to say this
but drorith was right
we'll keep it alive
that cinematic was disappointing
i mean, we've barely had time with turalyon post legion
there was no character development, and her being this rash when making decisions was lazy writing
we've had more with alleria
Ye
lazy and bad writing
it shows just how far gone Sylvanas is
she was going to capture the tree up until an elf told her they would still have hope
that was shit writing
ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
Sure, because there is nothing interesting about him.
totally inconsistent with the sylvanas in the book
im fine with her having burned the tree
o...kay... so absence of time/story with a character = not interesting
but her changing her mind at the last minute is shitty
saurfang says nothing in the cinematic
its shit writing
That your opinion m8
I mean. Anything that 'provokes' her she makes a rash decision on
ya know
like Arathi
i mean, sure... u can say Turalyon not interesting cause we barely have had time with him to see his story... i guess
Not interesting because it's just another "old velen"
And they won't use the same character progression as velen
That's why I hope they kill him somehow to make things elvolve another way in this war,maybe it will change something about Alleria
but nobody even objects to that rash decision
wut
Do you have thonk
old velen? from what?

Nathanos hesitates

so thats good to see
i really hope they plan to expand on the sylvanas story, becaue if she goes full garrosh, i will be soooooooo pissed
makesme think maybe he'll actually stand up to her
i hope so
She's already at that point. She just isn't forcing the horde into a schism yet
lol, she's gone beyond full garrosh
wut
she isnt kicking out most of the horde
she isnt consuming pieces of an old god
She' snot forcing a schism in the horde yet
^
When BFA is out, prepatch will have new content ?
She started up a war
pre mop garrosh was kind of enjoyable
You will ha e to
destroyed a major alliance port
Do horde stuff
but after?
Vris
ugh
but on the topic of evil/villain, she's waaay past that
she has always been evil
the question is when the horde will stand up to her
she has been evil since arthas killed her
Heck. @limber mural thinks we shouldn't even look back onto history for these events.
vris do you play on argent dawn? xD
legit had ppl defending her stormheim actions
they need to focus in on horde leadership
and have some politics stuff happen
I do all my RPing off a private server
we've had examples of her evilness DURING legion, still nope to fanbois
maybe have some kind of horde roundtable in 8.1
Private server
During cata
or post uldir
during WotLK
private
Fuckin first act
server
whom ping
in WC3
No that's not what I said
I said there's no point in reverting to history
It makes no narrative sense
Sure we can look back on it
there's always a point to reverting to history
to explain the present
Why did Jaina purge dalaran and overreact to the horde?
oh yea
but the history is equally morally crap
Theramore happened
it'll never make sense if you outright ignore past events that lead up to this
Why is Varian so hateful of orcs? he's just a warmonger surely
yeah, I don't dispute that
not entirely. Orcs backstabbed and killed his dad
honestly we need to stop with the idea of morals. morals are subjective
^
You are right
lets view each side and what theyve done as just actions, not good or bad, but things that have happened
But people dont want to accept it
I'm in favour of this working in a narrative perspective. It's ok.
ofc the opposite faction is going to see one sides as actions as bad
I'm not in favour of it working in a 'shoved down players' throats'
pretty much always
manner
what we need to look at is the reasoning behind each actions
sylvanas is trying to break the night elves
cept certain parts of morality are not subjective
that was her goal with teldrassil
originally it was to be done through capturing
but she was told it wouldnt work
so she took overly drastic measures
Night elves say mean things and bad things happen
anduin sees this horror and has no choice but to siege lordaeron or lose the faith of his people
*genocide
whether or not anduin wants to
he has to siege lordaeron
genocide is the purposeful wiping out of a people
she isnt hunting down every last night elf
[void] Morality is by definition subjective, so those "certain parts" are not it.
she is destroying their capital
thats war
not genocide
there is an important difference
intent
the intent is not to wipe out the night elf race
so it is not genocide
I mean
she attacks the heavily less defended mostly civilian population of Lor'daenal
lol, she's invading a forest, destroying everything, killing night elves and civvies, intends to kill off the leader, killing night elves in teldrassil was her goal
"capture" xD
Like just pointing out
sure u can say its not full out night elf genocide, whoop de doo~
@heavy cairn well, my point is that say u commit a genocide, there is nothing subjective about it, it is morally wrong and abhorrent action
genocide is the purposefully targetted destruction of an entire race
@hollow dock no moar elves
she isnt attempting to wipe night elves from existence - she is attempting to decimate their forces and destroy their hope
slaughtering out the entire population isn't genocide?
You dodged
decimate their forces by killing all the civvies her army sees
@mint arch that's the opinion of basically everyone, but that doesn't make it objective. It's still an opinion.
whether or not she is killing large amounts of the populace, she is not targetting all night elf outposts across all of kalimdor
Just the ones in her path
and she is not attempting to kill them all. she wants them gone
and slaughtering every living elf she sees
its a different intent
thats by definition the difference between slaughter and genocide
if you did it because you hated the people there it is, if you did it to take their land, no
this isnt my definition, this is wwhat the word means by definition
remember in cataclysm, when she showed the val'kyr to garrosh, and he told her "what difference is there between you and the lich king now?" and she said "i serve the horde". except she doesn't serve it now, she leads it. get out while you can hordies.
Genocide: "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group"
@heavy cairn lol, i mean then anything and everything is basically an opinion if u wanna think like that.... my point is that when it comes to morality, yes its majority subjective but there are certain things that go beyond opinions and ARE just morally wrong
"the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation."
its when you are specifically targetting a race of people because of who they are
I think
He meant
A full genocide
Where no more elves exist
Which would be a bless

it doesn't need to be full wiping out
How do you call a full genocide
@mint arch no, not "anything and everything" is an opinion. you're just saying "it's not subjective, <insert subjective view here (morally wrong)>"
she tried to commit genocide, took the actions and was going to do so
"the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation."
Peaches definition of genocide.
By this
yes
Sylvanas is committing it
She is deliberately wiping out the night elves. Slaughtering every living one she finds in her war path
@heavy cairn ur saying that morality is entirely subjective regardless of situation or action, im saying that no, some actions are morally bad and there is no subjective-ness about it
im going to go do the second half of the quests
Combining by-definition subjective words with adverb "morally" does not make them non-subjective, you're just describing where the opinion comes from.
So you've kind of been contradicting yourself a bunch
wonder what'll happen if she gets nuked by the vindicaar
"It's [subjective] but there's no subjective-ness about it" ๐ค
um no, im not saying morality is not subjective, it IS majorly subjective but then there is arguments about that
Everyone can have their own morals. For example its morally good in Sylvanas' eyes because she's thinking the horde will live at peace on Kalimdor once the alliance are wiped out.
Determining whether something is genocide is an observation of an opinion. mixed this up with something
the act of genocide and wiping out an entire race, i dont see it as something of a matter of opinion
So whether it took place is a fact: if someone intended to do it, it's genocide, otherwise not
We can agree that it's a genocide because sylvanas intended to do it.
just that i was saying certain actions, imo, like genocide is something that is morally bad and nothing subjective about it
@heavy cairn you think sylvanas will stop with kalimdor? 
But the fact that it's a genocide does not make a subjective opinion into objective
maybe "morally bad" is wrong term to use
[aen] no but she claimed she would so that's why it's morally good in her eyes
If she ends up not wanting to stop there she'll come up with some other excuse
well, thats the argument then: killing/rape/destruction/so on.... i dont think there is anything subjective about them, i believe they are objective evils
She was planning mass genocide before this. Azerite simply changed the target city. Original plan was to massacre everyone in Stormwind
she plays everything extremely close to the chest and doesn't reveal what she's doing til it's already happening and someone questions her on it.
Well, they simply are not. While many of us can agree they are evil it's still subjective.
well, i will concede that genocide depends on subjective elements
but as a concept, it is objectively evil ya
I think I have gotten Sylvannas Real plan: Destroying the world by making the servers go out by the force of flamestoms breaking the forums.
OOF
#sosavage
I'm going to stop arguing about basic logic
Opinions never become facts, and vice versa. You can make a fact that some group has some opinion, but that's fundamentally different.
well ya, i agree... facts and opinions~
but basic logic, this is an argument still out in the open
Debate.org is a dynamic social community where you can voice your opinion on todayโs hottest issues.
its a debate~
drops mana bomb here
sry, ill stop
still explodes

Yes morality is 100% subjective.
The spider is hungry and requires food and sees it a good thing to devour that fly
think that fly thinks the same way? ๐ค
Indeed
Attaching "morally" (an adverb) to adjectives does not suddenly and drastically change what the adjectives are: opinions . It just hints at how said opinions were formed.
Via someone's own morals.
like i said, using the term "morally bad" was wrong term to use
and i didnt say that morality isnt subjective, it is majorly subjective concept
if u argument is that something like genocide is 100% "morally bad"/evil/w.e but that is still a subjective conclusion
then sure, i can see ur point
my counter is that i consider something like genocide to be objectively (evil/bad/insert term) with subjective elements involved
looks to void

Ok but you considering it to be objective (which is an objectively incorrect way to phrase that) is not enough for it to be objective.
ugh, can you not skip the second half of the darkshore questline if you did it once?
not yet
uggggh
oh yeah btw i talked to zoridormi in darkshore and she sends you back so darnassus is still around but lor'danel is still under attack
i dunno if that's a bug or intended
um, so u consider genocide a subjective concept, not an objective one? @heavy cairn
literally
I am so mad I wanna cry. I loved Sylv but they're just burying her alive at this point...
nothey aren'y lol
Her first act as a ruler is to backstab and kill her allies
she's bad from the start
@mint arch no, I was saying it's not "objectively (evil / bad)"
well ya, we can agree to disagree on this
dont wanna get into a full on morality debate
By the way
I did read that debate site you linked
All the debates arguing for "objective morality" cited either subjective stuff or unproven creator stuff
that site was just a quick google search to show that it is a topic of debate, im not endorsing any of the opinions on it
again, i dont wanna go properly into this debate right now... also we're really off-topic
Yea please no debate lol
the only thing im pissed about the video
is that Sylvanas directly turned into their banshee with body
I still remember the words of Arthas
"With how much you bothered, the less I will give you will be the peace of the death."
yass mommy Sylvanas burn that lawg
My take on the current ontroversy and blizzards adds g Maybe I'll redo it a bit better with time
200% MAD
pretty sure her red, RUBY red eyes are a visual clue in all this
Ruby being associated with the corruption int he emerald dream and Nzoth
Dude
Her eyes are always red
That doesnt mean shes part of thr emerald nightmare or nzoth
And its stated undead cant be influenced by old gods
Exactly, she was acting way to anime when she got saved by saurfang
To translate someone elses brilliant post:
"So, if the war of the thorns was a m+ instance, you could say that you cleared it, but you missed every objective you had (like making it in time), because your hunter Sylvinus just needed to pull every mob because she got triggered by the NPC dialogue and your warrior Saurfang decided to not stand behind the endboss but instead to heroic leap through him for "honorable positioning", leaving the encounter bugged."
the Ruby Nightmare
Did no one read what i said? They cant be old god minions
In actuallity the void wants them eraticated
Its been stated in the windrunners comic and in chronicles
Latest chronicles
honestly I don't get people who'd actually faction change because of this but ok
like as long as pvp is saved and the gameplay is good then sounds like a good xpac to me
yea I've been digging war mode
Even though i was getting my ass beated when i tried it out i still liked it
i'm more of a pvp-er so war mode has so far been a bit of a godsend
I think most people that would want to change faction are those that care about the story and "Fantasy" of their character, not those that mostly like the gameplay
i used to have one main each (one ally one horde) but I'm full horde now
If its that then i just been modeling their stories around what happened
yea i can see that
I'm mostly an rper on horde, so I have many people in my vicinity that are quite unhappy.
RPers probably gonna have-yea
I get some people who are morally good characters are gonna not like this but eeeh
Like, my blood knight is not happy with "let's burn thousands of civilians alive"
A death knight could be really happy kek
Mine is
He was like strangulates everyone
sucks blood
regains green color
I've always liked Sylv and I'm happy PVPing as a horde so I don't see this whole moral thing getting to me
"regains green color" voodoo confirmed
voljin alive confirmed
voljin burned down teldrassil
All my night elves that didn't die with teldrassil/darkshore are now thirsty for that horde blood(roughly 30 of them died. Ones MIA tho.)
Well, come to the undercity. You can totally get revenge on us, because it is absolutely not a trap to use your anger to blow up our own capital with you inside.
"Malfurion regrets leaving SW with War Mode on"
lol
slight update to beta world quests since i last checked
azerite caches no longer can come from wqs, now they directly drop azerite gear, though you currently cant check the traits (i think thats unintended)
also, tortollan rep world quests give 250 rep instead of 100 when the reward is a rep token, since wqs are their main rep source
Lol. I am still waiting for the Alliance to win at anything in this stupid game.
Its always goes something like "I am there! Almost going to win! Argh.... damn it they got us."
no
@dense plover Last we spoke you said we don't know if it was Horde that burned down Teldrassil.
What do you think now?
thats why i was a snark
Wat to heck with the levels 100-110
its to balance the curve
Also gud troll at the end
otherwise it was an inverse curve
troll?
they did increase the amount technically
110 to 120
it was done mid beta
I got a lot of flak for saying exactly what happened and I think I am now owed an apology.
lol
And who are you to ask for apologies?
suck a cactus
classy.
I was right man and you had no basis to rage against me for calling it right.
But I think you should change those last 10 levels to Early beta-Late Beta
i have every right to do whatever the hell i want
you arent the thought police
just like i dont owe you an apology
what someone expects to happen and what happens are two different things. A prediction is never a guarantee, and for you to treat it like one in order to feel superior shows you have some kind of inferiority complex
stop doing math
Dude you were being toxic as hell just because I said Blizzard was doing the typical behavior of horde winning and burning the tree and the alliance not getting anything in return.
And here we are. exactly what I said did happen.
But Horde didn't really win?
because sylvanas burning the tree sucks for character development and puts her on the track to garrosh 2.0
The horde burned an alliance capital and bombed their own capital. I dont see how thats a loss.
dude
You are too blind to see or to follow a storyline then
i seriously dont give a fuck about winning and losing
who plays games
Didn't conquer
not 1 fuck given
and doesnt care about winning or losing
to wins vs losses
And she didn't kill malfurion
Did she seriously order the tree burned because she had a hissy fit over what that wounded elf said to her?
The story is focused too much on horde, the alliance are pretty much the spectators.
Idk the entire story seems to be about what horde characters do.
dude
But you can still see him
its the best i can do unfortunately
but i did manage to turn off messages from server people who arent friends
so assholes cant just pm me to be assholes
Nah you are right. This game is perfection itself.
It can do no wrong. Best writing ever. Perfectly balanced.
Sorry i disturbed this echo chamber.
grine
i literally said the writing for the sylvanas cinematic was shit
also, just for you
fuck theramore
Sylvanas had a good build up
Theramore deserved it
You honestly have no standing point to be judging the story of WoW
@zealous basalt she seemed bipolar.
She is bipolar
Or maybe the writers don't know what they are doing lol?
they are not very consistent.
Or maybe they are told to figure out a story on pre-determined conclusions that limit them
I'm not saying you're wrong, but you can't have a stance on the story of it with the way you've been acting, your single mindedness, and the lack of gameplay you've done in the past while
^^^
Thats an unfair assertion. I don't like to play but I still watch play throughs.
Playthroughs are not playing the game
I don't like monetarily supporting bad decisions. You know voting with your wallet?
I can still read the quests and see what happens.
Blizzard isn't running for president
Your opinion is weak compared to people who actually play the game and pay attention to the story
How much more do I have to beat this dead horse
just stop
you can beat a horse but you cant bring it back to life
aka
stop talking to grine, their opinion is invalid
and they just came here to complain about a game they dont even play
to people who have no influence over the decisions blizz makes
And you fellas keep moving the goal post because you know I am right.
This game and its falling subscription numbers are indication enough already
If you don't play the game and only limit yourself to play throughs...
No matter what your say
Your opinion is pretty invalid
considering they dont announce sub numbers anymore
@zealous basalt I vote with my wallet.
good for you
Oh yea?
but voting with your wallet does fuck all here
I vote with my own experience
we arent blizzard
Which worths more than your wallet
you are just complaining to us, just to complain
how would you know the sub count btw
you wouldnt
Briefly chiming in to remind everyone to remain civil when in disagreement about anything. Thanks.
@zealous basalt I think its useless to complain but still happily pay for the same crap over and over.
Its like those abused women that stay in the relationship.
wow
leaving seems a cleaner break.
Crap for you maybe?
thats an awful comparison
yea
I am enjoying the game
thats a disgustingly awful comparison
same
I prefer being a loser than follow a warchief that would kill everyone just for the sake of it
@zealous basalt How are you enjoying your worgen themed zone? Nevermind the 1 tree we got in Teldrassil is no longer accessible.
same
Elves are something I don't really enjoy
uhh
Teldrasil is like Silvermoon, no one goes there
They can have it, I prefer the new areas
where is silvermoon
Boralus more than Zandalar
North of the Eastern Kingdoms @restive sage
never even been there
What about the dinosaur mounts and druid forms that are exclusive to horde?
Are you dumb?
what dinosaur mounts
There's plenty of cool dinosaur mounts that the alliance get too
theyre on alliance side too lol
I prefer the wickered forms of Kul Tirans
the new dino
@zealous basalt Maybe I am Afterall expecting to get equal content for playing the alliance faction.
You'd know that Alliance gets dinos if you played the game
??
OOOOG
If all
Why would I pay to get half a product unless I play the correct faction Blizzard wants me to?
half a product???
@dense plover
what?
Boralus is prettier than Zandalar
what does horde get that alliance doesnt
Why are you guys so focused on me paying money to blizzard? Are you all sales rep lol?
Because for being in a beta channel
@restive sage And entire zone themed for worgen like the horde got in azashara.
No, we don't care that you "vote with your wallet", but experience overwrites looking at it
Don't worry sylvanas will probably blow up zulduzar next
arent worgen an alliance race tho
You don't really have something to offer
@restive sage Yep and got less content because of it.
i dont see how alliance has less content
@restive sage Worgen did not get a whole zone themed after them with unique quests like the horde got with the goblins in azashara.
thats my point. Playing alliance gives you sub par product unless you switch to horde.
Grine
you get 1 more zone
who tf would switch for 1 more zone that your not even going to
You don't play the game so...
oh w8 forgot the rules
@restive sage You said how does Alliance get less content. I just proved it to you. and here you are moving the goal post.
thats hardly even more content
oh no, this one zone is just slightly inferior to the Horde's version of it, lemme just pay $20 to transfer
Sarcasm, btw
Where is my thnonk
oh that was sarcasm?
In case you didn't figure that out
Thats the new meme
Wouldn't be surprised if you didn't
kek
@summer cobalt alliance did not even get a zone for it to be less.
Maybe I like leveling alts? And when I see how many new crap horde get while i am forced to go back to the same old unchanged regions i get pissed.
you can have my thonk
makore
eh il go faction change anyway
I have couple more
I tell you Grine
if you want
cant wait to get to that old zone that apparently is better than the alliance version of it and sit there for 2 minutes
Alliance leveling feels more refreshing than Horde leveling
There are some zones that feel better leveling as Alliance
Like where?
elwynn forest
Elwynn's forest feels better and faster than Durotar
C:
And the adyacent areas
if you dont play both factions, thats your problem
both sides have a full questing experience
Elwynn?
man, I love looking at a barren wasteland compared to a beautiful forest
Again, sarcasm
killing hogger for the 10th million time?
doesnt that go for every bounty in every zone if you level there multiple times
Doing the Mankrik's wife questline?
and none of us agree with you
Go ahead, I can counter you
so what point are you trying to make?
@zealous basalt Isn't that before cataclysm?
:thonking
I though they split barrens into two regions
double lol
is this thonk good enough?
INFEROS pls
woah
waow
There are quests regarding Mankrik and his wife, heck, its called revenge of Mankrik
Yeah I am pretty sure I played in southern barrens, there was a battlefield and a scar in the middle. The quest was fun but kinda sucked how the alliance was in somesort of makeshift camp but the horde had this huge castle on the side of the mountain.
Because
his only point so far is that horde side has a zone thats better than an alliance zone
Guess what
no
Alliance isn't locale there
im not guessing
not u
aww
They are the pushing force
:C
It is obvious that they will have lesser outposts than the horde
But
You wouldn't know that because you don't play so
๐ค
^
makore, why do you keep talking to grine? youve made the same points they continue to ignore
Dont the horde have huge post-northrend castles all over eastern kingdoms? Like in badlands or stranglethron vale?
let them fight
that how is it possible that Horde has bigger outpost in Kultiras compared to the small outposts of the Alliance in Zandalar
Because
Unlike Horde, Alliance goes sneaky, while they go oof
what
And they don't have big castles in badlands

or the vale
Look at the dinos and undead horse that my alliance human rogue can mount
so thats your argument about how I am suppose to be happy Blizzard put down 4 tents for me as an alliance player and put down an entire fortified castle for the horde?
Because my faction is a pusher?
No, that's my argument for you to shut up
what fortified castle?
ooooooooooooooooh
^
I would hardly call this 4 tents
Alliance, being smaller, wins faster than Horde being strong
fighting on the playground
even if its smaller than the horde one
Alliance is better than Horde
its a goddamn fort
but hey
@zealous basalt Alliance wins? when?
Let me recall
Warcraft 2, Warcraft 3, AND
Because I am lazy
throws Chronicles 1, 2, 3
Read these
Remember what I said about alliance still using old models while horde gets new models? there it is.
oh hey, I just sent a small expedition force to spearhead into Horde territory, lemme just demand them to build the WoW equivalent to Sparta in two weeks
you proved my point lol
sigh
They tell you the winners of each raid
look at the screenshot
your point was the alliance using 4 tents as a makeshift camp
Who cares about models?
not using old models
and a bunch of other animals and stuff
๐ค
Are you comparing
and kids too
Nah, it is done
Cata seems to be still a heavy remaining presence in the current game and BFA has not made any attempts to revamp those areas.
It's been done for weeks
Besides I don't want to piss Thulm
This is not an argument
Heck
This is just random whining from someone that doesn't know the history of the game
Because the amount of work that they would have to devote to revamping the world would be colossal
Although, it'd be cool
Someone that think
colossal titan colossal?
or colossal
I will ask you something boy
How much do you think that it would take to Revamp all Azeroth?
did you just call him boy
@summer cobalt I guess you are right. How long did it take to repair the Redridge bridge?
they are a troll
they are contributing nothing
and only came here to upset us
ignore them
why are you calling him they
Who cares about a stupid bridge
Like
He is the typical dude that thinks that everything is easy to be done
No, revamping the whole world requires lots of data space
he probably doesnt care about anyy of this. they are here to make us angry
that doesnt mean you cant want it
ignore them
@restive sage Nothing it seems unless everyone here subscribes to the idea that this game is perfection itself echochamber then you are a troll
did it really take you that long
to create that message
here subscribes to the idea that this game is perfection itself echochamber then you are a troll
dude, we complain all the time. but we complain because we pay them, and we play the game so we know the actual problems
alright so what im gonna say about this
you came in here talking about how alliance sucks
And we complain not only to complain
and horde is the best and gets more content and stuff
But to figure a damn fix
and your suprised people are mad at you?
^
Alright here is another complaint. 1 to 110 leveling has no challenge. The game is a grind fest. Its just about getting XP as fast as possible.
Especially since you don't play the game
BOI
BOI
He just
get him
Tilted me there
out of heree
TILTED TO THE EXTREME
FLAME HIM
someone bring the guillotine
HELP MOD
IF NOT WE ARE GOING TO MAKE A SLAUGHTER HERE
Like how many times do you need spam the same rotation for the poor npc to drop dead? The dungeons are a snooze fest.
And be thankful that the rest of the beta testers aren't here


