Upgrade own home to Castle

[warm temple]

I would like to upgrade the player's home to a upper chamber, manor house or a little castle. With a population of more than 70 (or more) maybe the own home could be upgraded or a new building could be added. In any case it 's something I think of the middle ages

[acoustic trellis]

I agree with this, I’d like to see some sort of motte or wooden keep for sure, even if nothing too big or fancy it would be cool to see

[wheat temple]

Overall more house design options would be nice.

[thick pelican]

Agreed, more house designs would be appreciated - or availability to connect buildings, for example you can build a free-standing kitchen for your villagers but you can also directly attach one to the house to keep your family members occupied, uhm, I mean, to ensure that fresh and nice food is provided.

[icy horizon]

yes ! yes !! yesssss !!!

[tardy viper]

Peasent dont have castles

[icy horizon]

some of them became lords ... this was rare but it happened

[viral plinth]

Racimir is as normal man, not a lord

[rapid reef]

yes, but it's totally possible and believeable that a large and ressourceful community could build a larger defensive structure like a motte-and-bailey. It doesn't have to be initiated by a Lord, especially not in a valley that doesn't seem to have many governmental restrictions, like the one we are playing in.
Also, in a sense that is how all people got into a position of power in the early middle ages. Racimir and his family are undoubtedly at the top of the hierarchy in his village. The more people that live in said village, the more powerful this family becomes. Is it so farfetched to imagine, that over the course of a few generations, the King might eventually grant this family a lower-tier title? Not saying that should be implemented. I'm just saying Racimir doesn't need to start with or hold the title of a Lord to not break immersion. I think if the "castle" is a predefined building though, it should be immensely expensive to build, so it really becomes a project for generations and only feasible for very large/prosperous communities.
I think it would be way more fun though, if instead of a predefined "castle" building, we just get more freedom in customizing buildings. Like freebuilding foundations, walls, roofs and stairs. That way people that want to can get creative and design their own mansions or even castles, while others can just keep their houses small and simple.

[acoustic trellis]

A normal medieval peasant couldn’t build a town of 100 buildings

[viral plinth]

that's true, of course, it would be a motivation to play over many generations if you could eventually get titles and an heir could perhaps build a castle in the Xth generation.

[acoustic trellis]

That sounds perfect, I think that’s the best way to go about the implementation if for example people wanted castles while also balancing and making the game realistic

[viral plinth]

and we could finally put to use all the coins that have accumulated over the years.

[acoustic trellis]

The tax on a castle (even like a small keep) should be prohibitively expensive

[nimble gyro]

Well... not to blow your dreams, once upon a time they said they never planned for castles since they want the peasant way of life.
Castles took many people to build especially in the medieval times where they didn't had nowadays vehicles and everything was done by man or horsepower. I took a look at the history of Poland and only 5 known castles were build(from what I seen, I don't know how accurate that is). It wasn't a thing back then.
The landscape didn't work either, since it's hilly/mountain like.

[acoustic trellis]

Makes sense to me 👍

I’d like to see for example a wooden watchtower (basically the same structure as the windmill but without the blades) or something tall looking to make a cool presence

[nimble gyro]

Have you checked if such a suggestion was made? If not, maybe make a new thread suggesting that ^^

[acoustic trellis]

It’s a thought, maybe I’ll do that

I think I’ll give it a look 👍

[nimble gyro]

Awesome

[acoustic trellis]

It makes me curious though. After watching the newest teaser it seems to have already added stronger walls and what looks like a gatehouse, which is already pretty exciting in terms of fortification

Before I suggest a wooden tower or whatever I think I want to see what this co-op update really has to show. I’m super excited after watching

[indigo tiger]

I need to check this!

[acoustic trellis]

For sure, it’s the most recent in #📌-general-announcements

[indigo tiger]

This may not be a castle, but it might be as close as it can get.

[wheat temple]

I think this depends on how you define "castle." Also, I'm not 100% sure but I'd think that most people would be happy with keeps, watchtowers, and "palaces."

[nimble gyro]

A Palace doesn't fit pheasant either.

[split swallow]

a palace to Racimir is a roof without a hole in it

Taj Mahal if you ask me

[nimble gyro]

We need the hole though, it's for the smoke to get out when we have our fire lit

[split swallow]

what are windows for

[nimble gyro]

Light, as people go crazy without it

[quaint igloo]

nope, nothing to do with me

But I'd like a manor (a castle is to painful to clean)

[meager lodge]

You think with racimir ? Or with one of his descendants ?

[icy mural]

still counts as a Motte and Bailey castle. The Motte being the raised ground, with the Bailey being the enclosed ground atop the Motte

[finite gulch]

Same, a manor house at least. Something so that once our town is big enough we can stand out from the plebeians lol

[patent bear]

Keeping to the Era correctness(hopefully) the people that were(rare) able to increase their standing to nobility were(usually) only able to own/hold a small "Keep" as a home. I think the idea was to NOT let the 'Peasant Nobility' get to grandiose with bigger homes than the King/Lords of the lands?

also... with the Castle keep in mind, this also opens up the idea of 'Open Pit Rock Quaries' into game play?

[wet pecan]

well if not a cassel at least a well bilt mot and baley sile fort

[candid isle]

This would be cool. Do we get to start collecting our own taxes? Do we declare our own fiefdom?

[loud flume]

I can picture it now drawbridges turning villagers into guards banks wine cellars

[mint marlin]

Wrong game for that.

[vestal tide]

id love a second story house like marigod's house in oxbow!

[crisp trail]

Hello, I think this suggestion would work better here: https://discord.com/channels/1069629094871978074/1173504490192769105 😉

[forest anchor]

It's crazy that people would even argue about being able to achieve a title or build a castle. The games not just racimir, it's his MULTIPLE generations and it's absolutely true that families rose to power plus moar late game is never bad ever I repeat everrrr.

[dire moth]

Correct imo, more content the better aye, ppl can choose to not engage and it makes zero difference to those who want this... excellent point mate

[quaint igloo]

I have nothing to do with that

[cobalt topaz]

Oh dear, it is obvious this game is not likely to get a building system like ARK Survival Evolved, or the newer version. That is sad since it would open up a lot of building options, to include a castle the player could design and build. It could also include fortifications. The catch is there would be more talk about raids and war options. Soon after that players would want the option to advance through the timeline common to the history of most nations of people. Wow, so many options, but clearly the desire by the programmers is to keep the game stuck in a specific time period the Polish had.

[forest anchor]

I wouldn't say it's obvious they won't do anything! But there's definitely a large base of people who think there shouldn't be anything to do with martial/combat features in castles/barracks.

Right now the devs are opening up to more players with vr and polishing like co-op.

Patience

[dire moth]

The question i have for you is this: why should they implement this?

castles/barracks etc

[forest anchor]

Castle's would have huge impacts on the valley !

Late game content

Economics

Villager jobs!

Beauty!

Lol it could easily tie into interaction with the king

[dire moth]

@forest anchor Thanks matey 😉

[forest anchor]

Happiness could be impacted by villagers "safety " feeling stat

Build a barracks or watch tower and get increased mood

Castle would be that as well

Content locked to the second or third gen

[dire moth]

this is what im intersted in tbh

[forest anchor]

Late game af

[dire moth]

good, i like the idea of generational unlocks

ie. only after 3rd gen u get xxxx

[forest anchor]

Yeah, the valley is largely peaceful right now but each generation could have a diffrent valley

But yeah I think they should implement that generation locked content

I mean it's the 11century right? So you've got ~300-500 Years of time for technology/ quests

[dire moth]

yeah depending on the patience of the player, i think most get to (maybe) 2nd gen and then stop

[forest anchor]

True, I think there should be a time skip feature if everything makes you happy like economically it's running itself ect ect. [ built into the game like the bed but again late game]

[dire moth]

interesting 🤔

[cobalt topaz]

What I think would be a great way to grow the game is stone works and the ability to grow a builder into a stone mason. That would be a new skill for at least one NPC builder to start and the other NPC would not be able to learn the skill as fast. Nor would the stone mason be able to build the larger structures like a castle, or fortification in the first generation due to the time it takes to make one stone block. It would be a slow task, but available to start. In this way the son, or daughter of the first NPC builder would learn to do basic stone work after a half a dozen years, but mostly limited to collecting stone blocks, which would take a season to make one. The next generation would be more of a mason (work faster) and able to do more than foundations and start walls for either a castle, or walls to become fortification. The following generation would be able to continue the work and teach other NPCs to be stone masons. Obviously the same scheme to progress towards a level 10 stone mason would take almost a lifetime. The key point being a mason would be limited to how many stone blocks he/she could make per season would be limited by type of tools used and skill level. In short, it would take a significant period of time and generations to make enough blocks to build with. More, or less like was true in history. 🤓

[amber creek]

I was just thinking this. Hiw nice would it be for us to live in a little castle. Just the player. With extra storages buildt in it.

[forest anchor]

this needs a bump considering the addition of crests!

[flat hatch]

I think this is necessary because it isn’t very realistic for a settlement to be managed from a house surrounded by walls. In 10th-11th century Poland (where I believe the game is set), the settlement or city would have been managed from a kind of fortified town with walls, like those in Piastovia. In short, castles should be added, and fortifications like those in Piastovia as well, as they would increase the realism of our settlement-town.

I believe that devs should have this into account

[flat hatch]

That is true but as our settlements grow, our character would have more money

so it could be able to build a castle not a palace a small castle

[uncut rivet]

In my opinion, it makes perfect sense, even if the developers originally decided against it. But the game is called "Medieval Dynasty" and there is actually almost no dynasty gameplay. You can have a maximum of 1 child and then everything repeats itself. But a forest hut develops into a camp, the camp into a farm and this into a village and this in turn into a small town and a big city. There is no need for a lord to justify fortifications and things like stone walls, any kind craftsmen's guilds, a town hall, a keep, watchtowers and other stone or larger buildings that are typical of splendidly developing big cities. And a village has to be managed differently than a big metropolis, of course. That has a lot of potential.

And why shouldn't such a powerful and respected head of this city rise to become a kind of lord in such a large community? There is already a king and reputation and quests, so why shouldn't one be able to acquire such a title? Of course, this is something that takes generations, but we then have the dynasty that is founded on one's own family and so it makes sense again. Every lord and other nobleman has ancestors in their lineage who were of rather humble origins.

[raw mulch]

You live in a secluded valley full of farmers far from any hostile forces. Why would you need a castle?

[flat hatch]

In the ancient Poland (1080) there were a lot of wars of this was realistic there would be castles

[raw mulch]

Again, this valley is in the middle of nowhere. Rascimir specifically goes there to avoid the war. Why would a farming community noone cares about need a castle?

[flat hatch]

It’s realistic for a village to be managed from a house? Rasimir is escaping the war; he knows he has to protect himself. Also, in his time, nearly all of these communities built castles as they developed. I know what you mean; I’m just saying it’s not realistic, that community ends up advancing, and it needs protection. In the new update (according to the trailer), the combat system will be added, and this idea makes even more sense.

[mint marlin]

No use to give arguments - they want it.

[raw mulch]

Yes. It is. Most villages didn't have a castle

The mountains are defences for the valley

Even when there was a castle, the lord didn't run every village. The elders of each village handled the day to day affairs. The lord mainly collected taxes in the form of crops

[flat hatch]

Look, if that’s your opinion, I respect it, but I think differently. There’s no point in arguing.

[raw mulch]

It's facts, not opinion

[flat hatch]

No it isn’t

[raw mulch]

It is

[flat hatch]

Look, Feudalism was the main system, and in case you didn’t know, they divided the territory into two parts: the fief and the castle. The fief was where the peasants worked, and the castle was where the landowner resided. In this game, we start with a small settlement, but over time, that relationship between us and our settlements will be called feudalism. It is unlikely that there were no wars in ancient Poland, so settlements were divided into two parts. The heart of the city was made up of a fortified town (sometimes castles) where the main organizations and institutions that managed the city were located.

There would absolutely have to be a castle.

This really is a fact

[forest anchor]

you're learning of the divide in the MD discord, those who want a "Stardew valley with graphics" and those who want a "colony sim", they won't budge or acknowledge sound arguments either. I agree with you on your premise whole heartily if we also consider the game is called Medieval DYNASTY as in Rascimir starts in a peaceful, relatively wild valley, and builds a city by most peoples end game. The game isn't called "Peaceful Valley", It's "Medieval Dynasty", where the devs are adding swords, crests, and armor by the looks. The pace of expansion by Rascimir and his lineage may start quaint but by 2nd or 3rd generation the Valley will have a massive city and probable target.

in the end I would just keep up with adding to the suggestion as the Devs seem to agree with our Perspective

[raw mulch]

We pay taxes directly to the King. There's no need for a castle. The whole valley is a fief, not a castle

The Valley doesn't have any big towns, it's all farmland, mining and hunting. Such areas rarely had need for a big, expensive castle. Remember that the game is set early medieval period, 900s-1000s. Castles were pure defensive structures then, not big status symbols

But thank you for proving that you lied when you said you respect my opinion and there's no point in arguing

[forest anchor]

Do you think the castle structure would have decoration slots like in homes or be brick or just wood like early castle/keeps?

@flat hatch

I was thinking it might even have a job slot for something even.

[flat hatch]

The person that didn’t respect my opinion were you laughting at me

[flat hatch]

Yes for servants for example

[flat hatch]

In my opinion, they should be as realistic as possible.

[forest anchor]

What would servants provide?

[raw mulch]

I never claimed that I did. You lied about doing it however

[raw mulch]

So no castle. It wouldn't be realistic. You just want one

[forest anchor]

@raw mulch lol your wrong isn't an argument, in fact we showed your logic Is flawed, a castle is the realistic option.

[tidal current]

Could we just stop arguing, here. Everyone is entitled to have their opinion and I can see some truths in both your positions. Just act like adults please.

[dire moth]

I have previously warned you @raw mulch about this type of behaviour
If you cannot engage without resorting to personal attacks/deriding players opinions there will not be anymore warnings from this point onwards.
Respect the rules and engage like an adult plz or refrain from engaging at all mate.
Thanks for your co-operation in this matter.

[raw mulch]

Are you going to moderate the other person this time or are you after a personal vendetta?

[dire moth]

Moderate them for what exactly?
Noone else has been hyper-aggressive and called anyone else a "liar", you have tho...
You have previously also laughed at me when I gave you simple moderation directions showing a history of this behaviour mate.
As I mentioned, if you continue doing this I will not be giving warnings anymore LordHammer - plz be repectful and engage like an adult (as everyone else is).
I have no "personal vendetta" against you, I base my actions on your behaviour is all mate.
Take care.

[raw mulch]

Okay. So you're making it personal instead of moderating fairly. It takes two to have an argument you know? I've never laughed at your moderation. Only when you ignored bad behaviour to pick on me instead of moderating. You're clearly reading in things because of your personal vendetta

[tidal current]

@raw mulch if you have critics to formulate about our work [Mike's or any other moderator] or if you have complaints about other users, go to #🎫-discord-server-support and create a ticket for that. It will be handle by the team (for complaints about other users) or by our CMs (for complaints about moderators).

Mike said why he was warning you etc and told you it wasn't personal but only based on your behavior. He remained polite and professional too.

Thank you

[raw mulch]

I will. It's clear none of you have bothered to read the posts

[tidal current]

I haven't, my own message was only a general comment and not a warning for anyone as I saw some things that weren't feeling right in the previous messages. Though, I didn't want to take specific actions as I didn't read everything (mainly because I'm all over the place in this channel, trying to cleaning it of duplicates). In this situation, with what I'm working on actually, I avoid giving warnings etc unless I was able to read everything in the thread.

[flat hatch]

Yes, Thanks

[forest anchor]

I just thought if you had a castle you could have a villager act as a tax collector!

[mint marlin]

Erm.... you remember: we are paying taxes.

And we do have a tax collector already. He is called "the castellan". 😉

[tidal current]

@mint marlin I think people wants to pay taxes BUT also their villagers paying taxes to them...

[mint marlin]

If somebody thinks, he/she needs it....🤷‍♀️

But we even pay our villagers no salary. Where shoult the tax money be coming from?

[tidal current]

that's an excellent question... though I have no answer.

[raw mulch]

Historically it wouldn't have been money. Farmers paid taxes in crops

So, technically, since we can use everything our workers make, they DO pay taxes

[mint marlin]

Then we won't need tax collectors 🤷‍♀️

Everything the villagers make, they bring into our storage.

[forest anchor]

I understand, but considering you built the entire village I'd say you easily count as the village "head/leader/lord", and therefore would skim a portion of the taxes and the rest would go to the Castellan.

This is actually how many feudal systems worked.

I also am going off the idea of you having a castle eventually which itself gives a few assumptions.

[forest anchor]

Your assuming a form capitalism no this would be fuedalism where they pay almost everything they generate to the individual who gave them land or work for their existence.

I'm also assuming this is late game, where if we wanted to follow most folks progress it's highly likely your villagers [ ignoring they are Npc's] would generate a small income as you do even before your first villager.

[The guys working in my smithies have got to have work contracted to them occasionally]

It's been 12years of mastery

In the end I'm just trying to flesh out OP's idea and you have to imagine what could be when it's not what is in the game!

[signal sorrel]

So, they would use part of the 10 hours they work solely for us for their own profit? Or work more then 10 hours a day to generate some private income which they could then also give to us? Hmm, I bet you could find historical periods where people were basically slaves, but I also bet that this varied over time and over places.

In the end I think this is one of these suggestions where it is less about “this isn’t historically correct”, but about people’s roleplay preferences. People like the idea of roleplaying a person of power, someone who the villagers must pay respect to, also in the form of money. I won’t begrudge other people their roleplay preferences, but I, personally dislike the idea of acting superior to other people, I like that we are a farmer/hunter/builder and not nobility. I would rather roleplay being a protector and spokesperson for my people, so this is a 👎 from me.

Also, lategame, you really don’t need the additional coin.

[forest anchor]

Sure the game involves Roleplay, that's exactly why you could have choice in what features to use and what not to but I'm suggesting features in line with the premise of a castle(not on a playthrough without) I often never build the repair shack or the herbalists shack, but I still like the extra contents!

[near oak]

A proper stone castle would be too much for the game, an Manor house, or fortified Manor, or a small wooden keep, or even an motte and bailey would be cool, but.....ofc not realistic for the location we play 🤷‍♂️

[forest anchor]

I mean that's what most considered a castle back then, I don't think most expected a massive stone fortress lol.

I mean I hope not atleast

That'd be really out of place so far

Something like this makes sense but I'd say more squat, with a walkable palisade wall like pistovia

[near oak]

It looks like the one will be showed on KCD 2 iirc, rly cool
Nebakov Castle, thing is, its dated 1403

We are situated like 400 years before the castle was built 😂 , but would be cool, even being a pre-made building, like the other buildings are. Ofc, would be a very late game feature for the game, and ppl would have the ability/possibility to choose between build it or not, being some kind of "noble" or stay as "peasants"

That could be implemented in form of DLC, maybe

[forest anchor]

Not really wooden forts and defensive "keeps" were around as early as the 9th century 😂

No need for a dlc it's perfectly inline.

Pistova shows almost perfectly the possibilities

Not at all out of place

[near oak]

I meant DLC bcuz i see alot of ppl here have a strong desire to "don't make the game violent"....and that's not what I'm suggesting, its just a new building 🤷‍♂️

[forest anchor]

Those people seem to have the wrong game in mind as the devs have shown already, but that's what I like about MD you can choose what to do and build and what not to.

Crests and swords as shown in the update trailer show that as well as a combat update.

[near oak]

Yeah, thats the point, swords are a thing that peasants were almost impossible to have it, but it will be add to the game, so.....🤷‍♂️

[forest anchor]

I mean most didn't see metal tools to be honest but carved and crafted wooden tools, the Game is going for a semi realistic medevil theme.

I'd like to make a pistovia if I like essentially with a new house type for late game that adds mechanics lol.

It's already in the game

[near oak]

At the end of the day, its up to the Dev team, choose to do or not

[forest anchor]

Of course yeah, all I'm doing here is brainstorming in the context of upgrading my home to a castle.

[near oak]

But i like the ideia

[forest anchor]

If people have an argument I like to try to show how it works if they're stuck, I mean absolutely no offense to anybody.

@near oak if there was a feature like op stated how do you think it would work?

BTW thank you for being civil and not a troll about your disagreements.

[near oak]

It would be a very diff type of building since ppl have their own home in MD, It would need to work like an home for you, but for others too, would need to have a somehow big storage space, and maybe a kitchen 🤷‍♂️

[forest anchor]

Oooo like a combined home kitchen and storage building! Maybe have building locked recipes?

[near oak]

It would be more "complex" than the buildings we already have

[forest anchor]

Like smithies have the tool recipes to buy

So build this and it unlocks x decor

Like pistovias walls?

I'm personally really jealous of the sewage system pistovia has

[near oak]

Well, why not 🤷‍♂️😆

[forest anchor]

I'm realistically a pistovia simp as they call it nowadays

Lol

[near oak]

Since we have an fortified Village in oxbow, why we cant have an fortified Manor on it 🤷‍♂️

[forest anchor]

Yeah I think most people are getting stuck on what they envision castles as being [ big stone fortress] vs what they were most of the time [pictures above].

Castle just meant fortified position Essential usually 2 layered with a keep in there.

[near oak]

would be cool to have an massive building like skalitz or talmberg castle? for sure would be!, but i know that they were rly for the nobles

and we have some "engine/code limitations"

[forest anchor]

Yeah that seems to be a big hiccup for alot of people as well.

By late game, from almost all pictures I can see, most people have built a city, and their settlement size is literally "city".

[near oak]

yeah, 140 buildings bro, i have somehow a kind of "settlement"

its quite big for a rumble village, i have even an "fortified manor" for myself, and a small barracks, armory, training ground, but dont let ppl know, that i made all from myself xD

[forest anchor]

This isn't really on topic but whether it's the valley or oxbow when the Castellon gives you building rights to start a settlement by medevil terms he's giving you low level nobility. Now most people seem to think nobility always started off " rich and gawdy" but most of the time it wasn't like that it was as you are in the valley or the oxbow.[ given rights of ownership of a settlement]

Land ownership was a massive social badge of honor back then

People have it in their head we're just peasants and while I'd say that's true as soon as you get to farm level even that's when most would be considered low level nobility.

Again not on topic but if we really take time to consider

[near oak]

indeed

[forest anchor]

If you look at kcd talmberg, hilarious enough most people have more structures then a wealthy lord does.

And subjects if you count, [ I have because MD is a battleground of ideas lol] , you have more subjects easily late game.

Again if your player owns their land and their work he's literally by definition their " lord" .

Anyhow yeah, a combined building with jobslots sounds cool af.

[onyx moth]

Wait…how did I not catch that… 🤔

[whole jacinth]

Perhaps building more defensive buildings like towers, lookouts, moats, etc before a castle like a progression would suit the game more. Also, depending on why type of kind you have. My current game's king is "Mad" crazy? so yeah, I might like to protect myself and my town from the Mad King!

Further to what @forest anchor said, many people lived on the lands of their lord's. The lord owned an estate of land and it never even became a city, it was just an estate of land where the lord allowed villagers to live and work on their land. Whether they worked directly for the lord or not, they paid taxes, or a tithe to the lord and/or their estate.

[west garden]

there was alot of scroll throu .. but i saw something about towers in here what - i think a watch tower would be nice that could possibly mark " bandits" cause im sure there was always someone assigned to guard duty to keep people safe at night

or even spoting preditors like bears if they wondered close

[oblique rover]

At the very least give us module stairs, walls that will stack up and side by side and floor parts and we could likely build our own castle. Just add the stackable snapable components. Some of the fences and walks ways get us close but they need to be able to snap together and also I would extend the height the bridges/walkway parts we have could be built. If you could build them right along a wall or snap to a wall you could have a wall around your village.

[tidal current]

this comment as nothing to do with this thread. Please comment in thread with related comments only. Here's a thread about modular parts for buildings. https://discord.com/channels/1069629094871978074/1184343519142346943

[last root]

It's a good idea but building a castle when there's no threat around seems unnecessary for now. Hopefully this will add more bandits, raids and give us a reason to build castles.

[fathom warren]

considering we can now name our village and unlock crest by doing quest for the king… there’s no reason if our relation increases we wouldn’t be granted a small title of nobility. as in we do unlock crest which were used mainly by nobility.
now stone castles might not make a lot of sense i suppose. but wooden fortifications like the main village on oxbow has would make sense

[loud flume]

Unless they bring in catapults stone castles would be necessary

[near oak]

BRUH dont need to be that agressive calling ppl things, by that its include me and i feel insulted 😢......the game try to simulate a life of an peasant thats why those ppls like to say "peasants dont have blahblah"......im not against the ideia of having an fortfied manor or tower, but for an peasant, an Stone castle is too much.....unless your are able to play through ALOT of generations

@nimble gyro

[tidal current]

respect isn't an option, you know! Sleep well in timeout!

[fathom warren]

🤣

[raw osprey]

I agree, I feel like the player should get something special.

1. Like a longhouse design like in the heartfire dlc of skyrim, with some stairs, some extra rooms to decorate, like a kitchen, bedrooms, a living room with a fire place to sit at, a dining table. I really like that layout and it was nice to build those.

2. Or castle.

3. Definitley castle walls would be nice, and to post guards. To make it look like a realistic city.

4. Having a stuart who can pay your taxes, and who make aragements for you provided you have the coins.

5. As for getting these, for example for saving the king from other trying to assasinate him or for bringing peace to the oxbow, as reward.

The game is great itself, and I've spend 712 hours in this gameso far, I do see so much more potential for this game.

[tidal current]

there's a lot of different suggestions in your message...
Longhouse: https://discord.com/channels/1069629094871978074/1131589819999453395
"Castle walls": https://discord.com/channels/1069629094871978074/1176893937512878240
"Stuart": https://discord.com/channels/1069629094871978074/1300574851270049934

Please make sure to search for suggestions and not post unrelated suggestions in existing threads (example: having a "stuart" isn't related to "Upgrade player house to castle")