#ip_rights_violations
1 messages Β· Page 51 of 1
On the mod from KGG?
every single RHS compatibility addon for NIArms
i haven't checked but if any of that uses RHS classes, it goes under the ND clause
so is any other soundmod, retexture mod etc if you really wanna go very anal about legality of things
it's always up to the authors to DMCA such uploads though, so if the 3CB lads don't wanna do it, or anyone else for that matter, then we are all wasting our time
well, unless @pliant oar wants to step up that is
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1616214295
RHS, VSM, NiArms and some others that are not listed. RHS DMCA in progress
We always try and give people the benefit of the doubt and 99% of the time people do remove. That's our experience. I know it's seen as a waste of time by many. And indeed different to the result others have had.
If they persist in hosting, then a DMCA will get filed. I cannot do it personally it needs to come from the owner of the 3CB Steam profile.
It gets better and better, in the German Forum they wrote they want to go to german court π
Their excuse of max 30 mods is a poor one at best.
I actually see that as a valid thing. That's why you make dummy mods with dependencies.. But.. Dummy mods. EMPTY dummy mods. You don't Fkin reupload other peoples stuff into dummy mods. Looks like one of their tech guys had the idea, and then one of their admins took it ad absurdum.
@brisk ember Isn't DMCA only valid if your own license prohibits it? Read again what I wrote above.
author file a DMCA takedown request based on a violation of Steam TOS Dude. Read my message. That's exactly what I talked about
but can 3CB file a DMCA based only on Steam TOS violation, while their own license doesn't strictly prohibit uploading to Steam Dude FKIN read my message. I just explained exactly that. That is how this conversation started.
What german forum?
@soft egret the 30 mods thing is indeed a problem, but it isn't being solved by pissing on someone's IP rights
take with BI and/or Steam
Yeah. They did almost everything correct with the dummy mods. That's a valid solution to the problem and someone (obviously not the uploader as he didn't understand shit) solved it correctly. Then that cognitively underdeveloped human came along and reused the valid solution, and added a couple illegal mod reuploads to it. I guess the guy who originally had the idea couldn't explain him how to properly add a dependency. He was probably banned from the group for having too advanced brain abilities.
PuFu answered my question, no need to get upset about it π
The PBO file format is not protected in any way right? Can I use the format for personal projects, with self written tools? Thinking about bundling the TFAR radio sounds in a pbo for easier redistribution, to be read by the TS plugin.
@wary tundra
everyone who is listed as (co)author on the steam workshop page of an item is allowed to file DMCAs. consider adding trusted folks from 3CB to your items
this is what the CUP Terrains Core page looks like
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=969966899 they deleted all comments ._. But it was so much fun
Lol. They listed Steam Workshop License?
Yeah. Last comment by me was asking them what that's supposed to be. Then all comments disappeared
for ze germans, pure gold
https://armaworld.de/index.php?thread/4240-sprechen-statt-dmca/&postID=33982#post33982
i was pissing myself roling on the floor
Moin,
Aufgrund das es in unserem Clan schon mehrfach vorgekommen ist schreibe ich jetzt diesen Post.
Vorsichtshalber schon einmal im BΓ€llebad.
Liebe Arma 3 Modcreator bitte sprecht/schreibt zu erst mit den Leuten die eure Copyright Rechte verletztenβ¦
wipes up the piss
My German isn't that advanced...
lol what the fuck
For the non germans
This evening we actually wanted to invite to a workshop on a TS on the subject of copyright, ownership and licensing law and Co from a German point of view for the ARMA community.
Unfortunately, we are unable to hold our workshop because we do not want to give our opponents insights into our working methods.
That comes from the group that's violating
what german fucking court are they talking about?
I never imagined when I wrote and published my mods that they would be stolen and reuploaded more than they were officially just downloaded but that is what has happened to a factor of 2:1
The fact that this is so common, and the thought pattern of believing they are right is kind of incredible. I don't really want the aggravation of enforcing the license and dealing with it but peoples attitude to other peoples inventions is kind of weird. I am all for balance in the copyright system but the internet never ceases to shock in how toxic such vast number of human beings are!
a. Steam is an US company, hence it answers to US laws (DMCA is part of US IP legislation)
b. If i am gonna take you up to court, i will take you to where the brand is registered, not where you are living
What got deleted though?
all the comments on that page
yeah they had two reuploads on steam
They deleted their temporary one but not the real one?
ye
Pffft... To think I held KGG in high regard
And on their main upload (they edited it 2 hours ago) they either will still face the 3CB DMCA, or they silently removed the violation while at the same time loudly big mouthing that they'll never comply and are willing to go to court to get their "right"
Oh and the uploader also made his steam profile private, as if that would change anything
Uhm... https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/178540-ingame-9liners-notepad/?do=findComment&comment=3305409 So they couldn't contact him.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1210050323 but they have his mod, under their name ?
They just created a github repo and open sourced his mod and uploaded it to steam with their name on it as authors, without being able to contact him?
Jesus Christ the thread is pure gold, how can one be so delusional (regarding the german thread)
Ah. Skimmed through the comments but missed that apparently.
It's on the 2nd or 3rd page
I am beginning to add some disclaimer in my license for mods, I know no one reads them but hey. I can just go "I told you" then. Can someone confirm if this is correct?
For your Steam accounts safety, do not reupload it to the workshop as it voilates Steam Subscriber Agreement section 6D.
π
For your Steam accounts safety, do not reupload this mod to the steam workshop as it violates Steam Subscriber Agreement section 6D.
From within game we don't have a way to determine where a mod was loaded from do we? Because if we did then we could stop repacks from working and warn the user.Wouldn't stop the ones intent on breaking the IP but it would weed out all the ones that did it accidentally.
well
generally repacks/reuploads are for server-specific or community-specific use
and groups are generally reuploading mods so that they can fit many different mods into one steam subscription or remove pbos
configSourceMods or sourceaddons script command @carmine folio
so generally you wont have people connecting to your server with reuploaded mods
might give you the @mod foldername
if you didnt tell them to get it in the first place
One day dedmen I am going to find something that you can't solve in SQF, it isn't today but one day π
I have tons of things. But then I also have Intercept to solve these
For example detecting repacks is nice. But that would also detect non workshop repacks. Like arma3sync repos from milsim groups
The ideal is we want to know if it is coming from !Workshop in the Steam folder structure and the mod folder name, then we can tie it to where it came from so we don't hurt other repacks not on steam.
needs extension. Which is meh-ish.
Potentially what could be done here is a mod that the mods wanting "defence" depend on that has a list of mods within it. So rather than requiring integration within their mod itself it is a mod that is also in the list, they don't run without modification without it present and it makes these checks and warns the user.
It can be removed so easily though. True, will protect against people who just didn't know. But not much more
What it will do is remove the whole mess to begin with of whether it is intentional on their part or not. Then all copies will definitely be intentional theft and importantly circumvention of DRM
Oh man..
Dwarden marked the upload as Arma incompatible. This is the reaction:
It is quite obvious that the opponents of the proceedings have recognized that their legal opinions cannot be upheld before German courts.
There is no other explanation for the fact that a Bohemia employee technically blocked the Steam Workshop content discussed here. It is quite obvious that one is now trying to cement the breach of law by means of a backroom door policy, bypassing German law and thus disregarding contractual rights.
Of course, we are also prepared for such a scenario.
The corresponding plans have been launched.
We will continue to report in the interest of legal certainty in this area.
You REALLY can't make this stuff up
this is just beyond funny at this point
like the comments on the workshop page were something else already, then that forum thread and now this?
this is still part of that forum thread. It's being actively expanded.
ohh great I gotta go back and continue reading then
This is actively making me unproductive because its so entertaining now. π
good, i'm not the only one then π
The next post where I'm telling them that they are learn resistant idiots and that arguing with them further will make no sense will be my 400th post on that forum. And.. My 300th like on that forum
what is it with you germans always trying to own everything?
first you try and conquer the world twice, now you guys try to steal a classic Arma mod!
ww1: stated by austria
ww2: started by an austrian
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
coincidence?
π
but back to topic
π« πΊπΈ watch it there bud
People really need to add "No Steam re-uploads" clause into their licences at this point. It should be painfully obvious that you really do need to spell evey intention out in simple language to cater for the morons
'''DO NOT UPLOAD TO STEAM WORKSHOP: It is forbidden to distribute the content of this package by itself, or as part of another distribution, using the Steam Workshop by anyone other than RKSL Studios. You may not upload to Steam Workshop or any other service that reassigns rights over RKSL Studios Intellectual Property to 3rd Parties.'''
the real burning question is, why does Steam thinks its okay to get full rights to something uploaded? All they need is rights to redistribute.
They want to hold the door open for future. As steam says they want to maybe use it to promote their platform. Don't particularly like that, but it's a legit thing to do.
I asked that question years ago when i first read the license and posted about hwo exploitative it was. They subsequently changed the licence to explain it was for "marketing" purposes only
"Marketing" is pretty broad
My understanding is that its to cover all possible legal interpretations
Say the DayZ mod for A2 was on Workshop - maybe Valve could have made their own DayZ SA? π
No.
under the newer licence thats not possible
under the old licence, its certainly seems that it may have been possible
I asked my IP lawyer at the time and he said "Anyone that accepts that licence is a fool"
Well it says "for promoting the steam platform" Wouldn't a steam exclusive standalone game also be "promoting"? Kinda? maybe free to play
Even with the modification of the licence im still not 100% comfortable but its a lot less ambiguous now
@soft egret Nope , it would still be commercial exploitation as they use it to generate revenue/traffic that only benenfits themselves. If the "product" is of mutual benefit then it becomes very hard to prove "malicious intent" which is the key to winning those sorts of IP claims.
in era known as storeWars, the single distributionVerse was shattered yet it was nothing compared to upcoming conflict now known as modWars 
@dull moon good tip... will raise it.
the real burning question is, why does Steam thinks its okay to get full rights to something uploaded? All they need is rights to redistribute. I've explained it many times before in here, their EULA is aggressive so that there is no liability on their end to redistribute your content.
I just found why the KGG people are how they are.
A year back they created a Life server that aims to reenact as real as possible juristics.
So end result was a bunch of kids that play as if they are professional lawyers. That's where all the bullshit comes from.
They even "created" a fake lawyers office and state that the servers are owned by that fake identity. Pretending they are a doctor of law. Pretending to be a lawyer is a fellony in Germany :D. Jail sentence of up to one year for that.
They also explain in their server rules that the Bohemia EULA doesn't apply to them or anyone playing on their server.
Not to mention, their server died after 2 months.
And again.. The origin of completely braindead stupidity is once again a Life server...
i heard there is free mod stuff here that I can take and upload on to the workshop without permission π
Its not even humorous to joke about.
it kinda is because they made hilariously insane excuses on a german forum
@soft egret can you explain why the fuck they keep bringing german law in the equation? i canβt grasp it
Because they don't understand anything I guess.
I asked the same question and just got ignored. Same as all my arguments about why their workshop uploads are illegal just get ignored
They are insane
the only other people i have seem mention their own state laws when it comes to illegal uploads were some chinese blokes
The fun thing is that is its pretty illegal in germany (german here) and I am kinda tempted to contact a lawyer I know about it
I am also a member of 3CB and they uploaded something from us π
It could easily cost them 500-900β¬
but even them understood quickly that steam runs under us laws
They dont care
The thread on the german forum is named: "Talk first before DMCA"
So somebody told them: why dont you talk to the modders first before you reupload their content?
lol, waste of time
And they basically said: oh we talked to some modders but they did not have us permissions
so we uploaded it anyway
shoot first, ask questions laters
but as @chilly silo said it, i suggest you lads simply add an entry directly related to Steam re-uploads in your license files
might be easier for the dummies out there
we have, but they dont care anyway^^
But it does make filing and processing DMCA's much easier π
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRzTK5-TRFM&feature=youtu.be seems like this guy is going on youtube telling people how to rip mods
lol.. Let's see how many results come up when you search the crawler for "rus weapons" π
we asked nicely to stop redistributing a ripped model so we dont have to report him to youtube and whatnot, the guy thanks us by making a video explaining how to rip our mod
I don't get it now
Video is almost the same i watched when i started with modding
Model is not touched only textures some pbo and configs can be moved this way
But how do people learn then
ripping, extracting, whatever
that has nothing to do with learning. That's a tutorial on how to rip mods
Redistribution of it is not fine i got you
Yea but if you want to take closer look at cfg and how its done what to do then?
You unpack the mod and look at the config? Or use the ingame config viewer? or generate a AIO config and look into that
nothing wrong with that
thats not what hes doing
he's telling people how to repackage mods
and make ripped subsets
Oh i see sorry
About arma 3 config viewer for me it was not so clear, no one ever told me that i can generate AIO config
My friend told me just to open pbo with pbo manager and then just use unrap if something gives you error leave it auhtor don't want you there
config viewer is shit and opening other people's pbos to CHECK how they do things is fine
always has been
telling people how to extract data from mods and repackage them for your own convenience has never been ok
now he's making a live stream telling people to raid cup workshop items and the chat moderator is threatening a ddos attack
keeps rambling about launching a "crusade" against cup
RE those kids always bringing up german law:
They are germans at the age around 19 and seem to forget that germany is part of the eu, and the eu has an almost unified handling for ip and copyright.
They think the german law is above everything else, without realizing that if this matter was handled the german way they would face even harder punishment
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1444867481
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=892265405 here are his campaigns that probably contain CUP stuff
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1rlLJjPHUL71MJ_HY87TeTuqo5Ame-QRG here are his missions on google drive.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qn7f9tFAGW0B6xFNkwFDSYV41So4VbUX Oh boi. Enhanced movement, ryan zombies and DayZ.pbo in Arma 3...
From that russian guy?
Yeah. He showed your conversation in the stream
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1444867481
3den Enhanced, no CUP. The other item also doesn't hav cup inside
just managed to translate a few messages from the chat
Just open in chrome and "right click -> translate" and it translates the whole page
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1131666732 this pack contains a big rar archive named "Mods for the Pain of Donbass"
Guess the ripped stuff is in there.
i think he has some encrypted pbos in there
the rar file contains just an html link
cant open his pbos
if anyone was so kind to help out and take a looksie, it would be appreciated
the workshop crawler seemed to be able to open them. Or atleast most of them
Maybe they removed some part of the pbo code like StokesMagee did to make the pbos usable and unopenable
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=969966899 they updated it yesterday. But according to crawler and their credits list it still has 3CB, they didn't remove it
was it also updated by the crawler?
crawler should update at midnight
roger
running the indexer now
Wow. The german retards used GDPR to get all their forum posts deleted. π€£
Google archives cough
Someone realised finally that they've been talking out of their asses ?
Deleting possible evidence that could be used against them
But something that was on the internet stays on the internet.
Rules of the internet....
Wow a guy on BIF threatened to take down his mod everywhere if people keep illegally reuploading it. So I thought I'd ask what the workshop crawler says about that.
10 reuploads, 2 of them also have TFAR reuploads, tons of NiArms in there too. And one even renamed the pbo from ABC.pbo to CBA.pbo as if that's gonna hide anything.
Here is that guy with the renaming
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1585262570
3CB weapons, rksl attachments
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1604909880
the renames are real with this one. clafghan, revn is RQ-11 Raven, cant guess the others
Well. That's another good modder lost because people just stole his stuff...
which mod ?
Tfar animations, grad trenches, one of my mods,...
nah i meant dedmen which mod will get shutdown when this doesnt stop
RSO Buildings. Already happened
Rso buildings
π¦
All 3 of the TRS here are reuploads:
https://steamcommunity.com/workshop/browse/?appid=107410&searchtext=Trs
JSRS, Enhanced Movement and others. Not sure if authors are on here.
bi should just throw away the workshop
Not really. Workshop is the one place mod makers can even keep track on
It's the lack of proper rules
The workshop itself is a good distribution platform, the management and controll sucks though
And enforcement
This
if anyone wants to have a read on RSO: https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/200831-rso-buildings-pack/?page=4
lacks policing
its ridiculous that a platform as big as that needs the modders to be their own police and check for people stealing their stuff
Valve basically said "Here's a platform, and here's a TOS that says we're not responsible for anything that happens on it"
Its free hosting, though. At great speeds.
The alternative was sites like OFP.Info and armaholic, which had to deal with massive costs of growing libraries.
and permission-less uploads (armaholic)
Steam/BI should gather a group of researched/trusted volunteers willing to wander the workshop for illegal uploads and take them down without going through the whole DMCA process
like stuff's being marked incompatible now
@soft egret the renaming guy just claimed nothing in his mods is stolen content π
and now he's deleting every comment about it
Don't even understand why his military clothing mod has a building mod inside it Β―_(γ)_/Β―
His other renamings: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1604909880
can you see what else's in that pack?
would have to get a deep scan list from crawler
Wait, RSO released? I thought they were making buildings that werenβt actually released or in any map yet.
Variable.A made a map with it. Mogadishu
@south pelican it was released in an alpha state, I updated but never released the update, 1. because of the very reason you guys are talking about, 2. the team split apart. Variable.A got permission from me to place the RSO buildings in his map. He however used the Alpha state of the mod. Thats why people were complaining about getting shot through walls. I fixed that and never released due to reasons above.
I have them but I can't trust anyone now. Final stance.
Thanks for the support btw.
Here are reuploads of the exact same RSO.pbo:
This is just a reupload of the Mogadishu Terrain https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1536012220 (exception he asked for permissions which I granted)
Doesn't seem to be the terrain, also has a custom bisign https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1454543181
Some units modpack https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1439531138
Tons of reuploads of tons of other peoples stuff, also custom bisign https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=812684627
Some modpack, custom bisign https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1406707872
Some crappy life server, they also reuploaded some of my stuff https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1416342600
Some life server https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=908829638
Some russian life server, also reuploads of my stuff, custom bisign for RSO https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=877731210
Wow. This is dense. They have "osr.pbo" with the same hash as your RSO.pbo. They renamed it to hide it https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1604909880
ALL REDISTRIBUTED without permissions. Oh look theres life servers on there too.
I'm not wasting my time in chasing all these fucktards and getting them shut down, it's a stress and PITA that I don't wanna deal with, so I'm pretty much going to leave it there. Unless the community charges at them and makes a full on aggressive stance towards them.
I give up trying!
Such a pity too, I've plenty of things people would have had fun playing around with in Arma, but if IP protection is going to go unnoticed by the BI Devs and steam, then I'm not gunna to scream at a brick wall.
Hence my attitude for monetized mods. I don't care what people think pretty much like the thieves. They might aswell come in my front door and take all my belongings I worked hard to earn for.
Well, go out fighting I guess? DMCA the ones you currently know of
The "dense guy" says nobody cares about IP theft
It's a shame that such people kill the Modding Community of Arma because they won't respect the rules and licenses of Modders and their released content.
Really depressing reading... I hope this is getting picked up at BI. This is a community killer if it's not sorted
every thief is a community killer..
3CB planning action on the reversing name chap?
Dedmen's found 3CB Weapons is his Realism Weapons mod
I presume so. Will ask Lifetap
cool if we put up a mention next time we find something related to 3CB mods?
Yeah. If you @ me or Lifetap. Or Evrik
Or myself, I've been keeping an eye on things too.
alright willdo
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1571923379 - Looks like a reupload, can't confirm tho
very compact description
Anybody knows who did this? Steam Workshop item? https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/a5ku3arm92zl545/0hhj7mdzla921.png
Specifically the uniform retexture
I'm gonna take a wild guess and say that the helmet and vest probably belong to one of the numerous underground mods with ripped content etc, they probably retexed the uniform (which is your BDUs right?)
Perhaps too general disussion for this channel, but does anyone have a sense of why there is an underground market for free mods? Are most people trying to just distribute to their groups? Or just take credit for some elses work?
underground market for free stuff? seems weird π
what do you mean? workshop reuploads? or something specific?
Well alot of effort seems to be going into policing people reuploading mods.
Seems like there is a kind of market going on
nope.
just idiots that don't know how collections work. Mostly.
There are also very few guys that want to steal other peoples stuff and put their own name onto it.
But most reuploads are just idiots
So why are they doing it? Back to my question.
that don't know how collections work
They want to make it easy for people to get their "modpack" but are too dumb to set up a collection or proper dependencies
ignorance, stupidity, "i made tis gib me internets points" mentality
How many violators put up a fight? Most? Not many?
@snow bloom Yes the BDUs are mine
Lektar removed his attempt straight away when I warned him, but others I bet don't listen
I don't fly by this channel much, but is this the state of play all the time??
How much actually gets.resolved??
I mean from here, what action gets taken from here
None I think? This is place to discuss what could be done, get peer support and such.
basically @tender cedar
> Reupload gets spotted, shared in this channel.
> Authors are notified through Discord ping or otherwise.
> Comments are left on the SW Item about the IP theft.
> If perpetrator removes it, end of story. If they put up a big mouth, they either get DMCA'd by the author or, in case the author cannot be reached/left the ArmA scene and it's been confirmed that it's illegal, we send it to Dwarden, who then assesses whether it'll be marked incompatible with ARMA III```
~75% of the reports here are dealt with and are in varying lengths of time, removed
Ok. So I'll need to troll through stuff regarding rso
Basically just comment on the item "Delete my work within X (X>24 usually) hours or DMCA gets filed"
Ok
if they remove it, your work's done. If they delete your comment or don't act before deadline, file DMCA
Ok
Cheers
I had a thought today though, not sure how it works.
Why is it software programs are ip protected and hard to copy and duplicate unless you know what you are doing. Like Photoshop for example or even Arma 3. Why can't mods be protected like that so it's actually difficult to do.
pufu does not even give warnings on RHS stuff anymore. straight dmca
That's kinda where I'm getting too.
because EBOs can only be used by BIS
Ok. But can't they get ip protected like game is?
hm you'd have to ask the chaps in the high tower (SYSADMIN and BOHEMIA.NET) that, sorry :/
Ya see where I am going though.
It's a logical solution to this incesent thievery that is ruining people's enthusiasm to home support the game.
well that, or BI gets a team dedicated to monitoring the Steam Workshop
well there is the workshop crawler
There should be a policy that states, getting permissions is like your insurance you are allowed to do whatever you asked for the mod. Like proof of purchase via pm. Prove you have the permission or it will be removed end of story.
The author retains the conversation, so does the user. If no proof of usage is presented then the mod is removed. I'm talking about uploading as part of their own mod. Whatever that may be.
For example, I'm sure I have the conversation so.ewhere on my account where variable.a asked for usage in Mogadishu.
yeah it should not be that hard but ppl are ignorant
We both present our copies and he is safe, where as other which is 99% of the list I gave should have them instantly removed, no questions.
Well it's the ignorance that will shoot them in the foot. They and the author have 24-48 hours to present proof of permission otherwise instant removely will occur from the end user.
I mean INSTANT, this will not stop unless it is taken seriously enough by hitting hard and taking a tough enough stance.
Not sure you can expect something like from BI. They don't earn money from mods, so why'd a company spend money on it π
debateable
well the choices of the past 5 years to indicate that a bit
not really like it's something that started happening a year ago π
yea im not saying BI will change this
maybe they don't need to. Just set up the current system such that authors have way more power over what happens with their content
They are not spending money on it though. You say dwarden removes the mods?? He could or someone else could adjudicate it as genuine or not.
The report is filed as per the norm, a moderator requested to see the permissions, if it isn't or isn't convincing enough or the author hasn't authorised the usage in such a way in written form to the end user, then its removed.
I think that's like giving a warning.
kinda means "warning, this mod won't make it till the next week"
It should be removed end of story. Then the message eventually gets through that permissions need to be sort after or they are wasting their time because it will come down in a flash.
No matter what they try if they don't have the specific written permission and proof they have then it will be taken down. Until they do and can prove they can do what they are doing.
I can understand that it should be removed, but remember the steam workshop is not controlled by BI completely.
Yes, but do they have the ability to take the mod down?
Yes.
There you go then. All that needs then is a moderator to be informed of the violation, they mediate and request the permission slip as it were.
Normally the best way is to DMCA it and then Dwarden and the other Steam Moderators can then react.
Its not stopping them though. It needs a tougher stance.
I can appreciate that, but in truth i can never see it ever stop. This is the internet, you will always get those that don't want to follow the rules.
The more violations are controlled by taking an aggressive stance on EULA violations the less it will happen eventually. It might be a pipe dream but in theory it's very logical.
Atm EULAs literally don't mean anything.
That maybe so, but from my perspective aggressive stances don't always work. I can say this as a member of the BI Forum Moderators.
I do understand that EULAs may not be enforced enough, but for that to happen BI needs to have a dedicated team to enforce them.
Well that just proves BI needs to seriously pull there finger out. My ranting via the BI forum and possibly here over modders protection and BI support is justified.
Your ranting on the BI forums was not justified and broke forum rules.
Yeah whatever and xyla didn't bullshit the forum moderators either
Well if you want to take that stance, forum infractions apply here on Discord as well as the BI Forum. Also do try to remember the moderator are volunteers, we aren't BI employees.
I'm not biting at you but that whole situation was a farce. He told me one story, deleted his comment and then told the mods another and whose story did they believe. Definitely not mine.
The whole EULA is a farce because it doesn't and will never protect modders work. How many times is that screamed about by modders.
Well i am unsure which situation you are referring to, its not something i recall and ive been a member of the moderator team for 5 years now.
ineptphid has disappeared, hes not been active since October.
Anyway, back on topic.
Anyway regarding the EULA i understand your concerns, i am addon maker myself. Alot of my own addons i have pulled off steam and other places as i don't have the time to work on them and also i have had work stolen from me before.
Less in Arma3 but i had work stolen in Arma2.
Why has BI let this go on for so long it's crazy to think that they don't realise how it effects the community. When I hear on videos and read from BI " the great community" I cringe literally. It's like my blood boils. Because it's like an epidemic of gold digging whores out there. Yes that was a Bill burr qoute.
well its a great community as long as you're on the benefitting end of modmaking
smells like sarcasm
more policing on steam WS would be nice, but if you expect 100% compliance that is never gonna happen
even big music companies fail at policing the internet from people stealing their stuff
as for mod monetization, i think that is going to happen sooner or later, dunno how i feel about it tbh
The answer in the industry as a whole is basically to give big publishers the ability to either API based DMCA strike something or to directly internalise fingerprinting to remove stolen content almost immediately.
I am of the opinion that if you want to defend this IP that a technical and automatic solution is going to be required. We talked yesterday about a simple form of DRM to warn players and potentially stop mods working and I think the workshop scanner could get to the point of automatically DMCAing clearly infringing mods. Both are absolutely doable
Sounds ominous
yea i agree
Choose your poison really. Either you accept it is going to get stolen and derivative work is done and you spend hours and hours chasing this stuff and filing DMCA's or you take the steps to deal with the amount of theft. My mods have both been stolen more than they have been downloaded, that is the extent of the issue, it is the majority of the usage of the mods.
I see no personal value in chasing 5k of violators on the steam workshop, that is to me a waste of time and probably would take longer than it took to write the mods to begin with
I'm just passionate about the modders rights. But if everyone wants to just accept it as the norm then go ahead and be exploited.
i agreed with @carmine folio just to clarify
BI has been crystal clear that they can not and will not help modders further to defend their rights so as a collective community I think those two tools - a scanner that can automatically strike and a mild DRM that wards off accidental infringers is the right combination of things to do
the workshop crawler was made by a user, im pretty sure the engineers that work at valve could easily cook up something in a better fashion
and with better policing tools for everyone involved
It's not fair, right or legal interms of the EULA. I think the problem is the abuse and non effectiveness of the EULA. Something else needs to be in place.
Absolutely they could, but they wont. Steam profits from this system, as to an extent does BI. They will do only what they are legally forced to do.
I am of the opinion that if you want to defend this IP that a technical and automatic solution is going to be required. We talked yesterday about a simple form of DRM to warn players and potentially stop mods working and I think the workshop scanner could get to the point of automatically DMCAing clearly infringing mods. Both are absolutely doable
i was thinking this was meant as an intervention from steam
i dont think they will do anything for now too anyway
companies generally move only when money is involved, if they cant take a cut back they dont care
or do the bare minimum to have their asses covered
It has been years, no one is going to help modders defend their IP further. It is absolutely on them to do so, there is a service here that modders might even be willing to buy.
Why should we spend the dollars.
The same argument is made by creators all over the world. It is just a normal part of business at this point.
What a world we live in, never justification for the masses the minority ruin the rest of us.
@brisk ember because EBOs can only be used by BIS Doesn't prevent people from taking your stuff and reuploading it though.
You can't really protect something that is meant to be open and accessible to everyone.
@tender cedar Prove you have the permission or it will be removed end of story. that's kinda how it works for monetized servers.
Even if BI took down the infringing mods like you want, nothing prevents peple from reuploading. BI doesn't have the authority to ban people from uploading to the workshop.
@tender cedar Prove you have the permission or it will be removed end of story. The author retains the conversation, so does the user. If no proof of usage is presented then the mod is removed.
That's almost the exact format that I use to have mods removed. Without verifiable consent (Written proof which can be verified) a mod may not be uploaded...
Could be wrong but I believe it said even in the license that the permission (or license) must be available to a reasonable extent to the end-user?
I'm not quite understanding your meaning, could you rephrase that possibly?
@brisk ember
Think he means, exactly what you do do, and, what I was suggesting.
Too often I am told "but I have permission". But,when it comes time to produce said proof, it is often not verifiable or it is not applicable.
This is how Mods with multiple creators should be handled.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/509862944121815060/532468145940725760/Screenshot_25.png
I thought it says in such license that whoever "redistributes" content must indicate the license (/permission) clearly in the redistribution, e.g. show license/proof of permission @fossil basalt
Don't confuse the likes of "Share Alike" with re-uploading to the Steam Workshop. The Steam Workshop, as a service, has specific restrictions as to what can be uploaded. The reasoning behind this, is that you are granting them "rights" which only the original creator can grant. So you are in essence, you are saying "yeah, you can drive my neighbours car that he said I can drive".
Actually I didn't hear that yet. But I'm sure that already happened. "But it says share alike! That means I can share however I like" π
As I've said before "you can't fix stupid".
Not talking about reuploads from SA's but for example permission or license from a mod released on the BIF, being by someone on the workshop
So, you mean, like a statement (from a mod author) allowing someone else to reupload? Even that is questionable, because once again, the reuploader would be giving away (the author's) rights, that he is not entitled to do.
The elephant in the room is the Steam Workshop itself. As a private platform, it has its own requirements.
while true, it'd help identifying most of the 'illegal' uploads
That just overcomplicates things. The easiest way to know if something is "illegal" now is if its not the original author uploading it.
how do you determine someone is the original author though? what if i have a different nickname on steam? or someone changes his nickname to mine to reupload my stuff?
There are various ways of determining that.
steam id
No. Because the creation of a model is independent of Steam.
addon maker's tag not registered on OFPEC? No, then its already outlawed. π
OFPEC?
can you even register your tag there anymore
no
GitHub is one way.
Oh, I didn't know using the crawler was free. I had a feeling first time using it would be like being punched in the gut by a wrecking ball. I wasn't wrong. There goes my weekend.
using the crawler was free @river spear should add a donation button for himself
With the deep scan there's about 127 uploads
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1620363714 - The description is all you need to know there's reuploaded mods...
Yeah. His name already rings a bell.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1553593415
Kola's ace extension, Firewills jets, diwakos ragdoll, ctab, RH pistols, jsrs, mbg buildings
@humble delta ^ Would you clean that up maybe?
@soft egret Will do now.
@carmine folio @wheat wave I'd love making a small DRM system reality if only there was a way to make it hard to remove
I remember dedmen coming up with a solution but I think it heavily relied on Intercept and I don't know how easily it can be applied to this
I will have to hire someone to file the dmca's. It's getting way too much lately
I mean, if the addon were EBO'd, they couldn't easily remove it could they? @river spear
yes they could
Anybody have any good examples of what they put on the DCMA when filing with Steam?
I want to make sure I got the right idea with what I put :/
@amber eagle
PM inbound
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=937122919 I did not create this terrain.
Permission granted by creator to upload.
Do a text search on "I did not" on the workshop
60 hits all saying they didn't create the mod they uploaded lol
Just asked proof of his "permission"
BIF says nothing about any permission or license
I think I remember that name. Not sure though.
There was that other xxx Battalion xx ranger group that had tons of reuploads and the exact same logo. But I think there are multiple groups with that same logo and same name
quite likely if they all RP as the same RL group
^
Drifter1264 is the author. I believe chase has permission . And I have permission for an updated version https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1481258225&searchtext=Fort+Jackson+ . There are two other re-uploads that I do not recognize https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1394556303&searchtext=Fort+Jackson+ https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1578731471&searchtext=Fort+Jackson+
@spare osprey But where is the license?
A lack of a license means the the most restrictive license applies.
I donβt know, it wasnβt a topic of conversation when we were tying to fix it . Iβll contact him to update the post.
May also want to remind him that the SW (even with permission) still prohibits (non contributor) reuploads.
Iβm a contributor. Should he add me to the original post as well ?
Yes, and to the mod as well (see link)
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/509862944121815060/532468145940725760/Screenshot_25.png
We have every contributor listed, each with equal rights.
But, as mentioned, listing it in the first post on the Forum will solve the majority of the issue (at least as far as we are concerned).
Wilco , I reached out to him .
@burnt oak @dull moon You certainly can register your tag at OFPEC considering that there's one registered like bi-weekly, still. Unless I'm unaware of some major problem?
Anyone have contact to the UG-C life guys?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1564922485
NiArms, UGC, Enhanced Movement, FEMAL, OPTRE, A3PL, S5xD (another life server), Taunus, UGC (another life server), TRYK
Man these guys. ......... Wait... I know that guy. He is from s5xd and asked me to give them monetization permission once, I denied them a few months back because they were monetizing stuff that they couldn't. I just wanted to report them for that after I tell the guys who'se content was stolen in here...
Turns out s5xd has shut down and this is their next try..
@visual elm (Jack Gallo) you care to explain?
@peak violet
@opal kernel is project lead.
Told him to take it down weeks ago but I have no power to do it
its DMCA time then
π«
BI doesn't care. Reported a dozen times for monetizing without permission while using mods that don't allow it. BI does nothing.
I always thought they'd block such servers via battleye..
who DMCAed it?
next time it shows up with australia in it, gimme a msg. latest australia terrain uses and includes CUP terrains core content without permission
ffs, this reminds me of smth...
now i have to look not only for CUP reups, but also australia
when and where does this end.......................................
can't i just DMCA strike the whole workshop and write sorry letters to the false positive?
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
OPTRE they took our OPTRE_Buildings
Talking with the dude now and is adamant that they have βpermissionβ
They really need a way to stop repeat uploaders who receive DMCA's
valve beeing valve... cheaters will get an insta ban while copyright violators are tolerated...
Read the description of this goldy: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1552679296
holy shit its always those life RP communities who causes ip violations
this contains RHS ripped content, might as well contained other people ripped content as well. some of you might wanna check it
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1615958363
This is a Private Collection for the group, I did not make any these mods!
private != steam workshop
private != ripped shit
Down already.
Prime time for DMCAs
@fossil basalt yeah i also got a PM via BIF about it
I do apologize, I did not know that one of the mods was from RHS. Wish you Would of personally messaged me instead of just reporting it! The collection was made so it is easier for new group members so they don't have to subscribe to Fifty different mods. Again I do apologize!
Excuses don't justify the act nor the 'need to be informed first'
You don't ask a baby to return your keys.
Where are the days 'new members' were capable of following basic install instructions... when they didn't even complain about downloading from PWS or ArmaHolic and installed it themselves with a simple instructions sheet..
Need a how to create a dummy Mod with dependency guide .
Create a pbo with basically nothing inside or just a config with name etc. Then in steam workshop add mod dependencies
Oh and sign the damn thing π
I donβt lol . My point was there is an easy solution to the βModpackβ needed for the servers not showing all the information issue. And the βitβs difficult for New guys to load modsβ issue. Also on the plus side I can add or subtract mods from our list from my phone. And for tech support , unload all mods , load X mod and all dependency, join the server . For anyone thinking about creating a mod pack dont. Make a dummy mod with the mods from your list as dependencyβs it makes life easier.
That's one way, or as stalker said: make 'em RTFM
You guys got more knowledge then me, all I know is its been stated that all Start Wars thing wasn't allowed so anyone know about this one: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1623264983
@broken hornet you handle optre? should I message you when I see it in reuploads?
@carmine folio It will be taken down soon enough.
CC Euler is part of that.. I remember that name... He once had 3 modpacks that all got taken down..
Copyright Β© 2018 by The Clone Wars Mod Team HAH π€£
Afaik they got self made assets only.
They even say that star wars IP is copyrighted by Century Fox and that they reserved all rights especially trademarks.
I understand, thank you. While on subject, since Star Wars is a protected trademark how come other mods that resemble HALO (and so on) can be allowed to be created. Is the IP different there? Just so I get a grip of how it works
Microsoft has stated that HALO fan made stuff is allowed to a quite far extent if I recall right
Star Wars is one of the most protected IPs out there. They (Disney) explicitly forbid any use of their IP outside of those specifically licensed to do so. With regards to Halo, I am of the understanding that the Mod team received permission to use it (from Bungie, not MS) as a "fan made Tribute" sort of thing (whereas Disney forbid even that).
https://www.xbox.com/en-us/developers/rules <- use of microsoft IP
Find out how you can use things like gameplay footage, screenshots, music, and other elements of our games to make things like Β machinima, videos, and other
You have to be careful with that one @faint nacelle I remember seeing something that superseded it.
I understand, that's good information. Hats of to you guys for explaining it to me!
I just remember an instance of an optre sidemod being taken down as the GCUR thing from MS was not linked, though I'm not 100% if that was the true case.
Dutch works on the mod tarsulsw
Where are you getting that statement from ? *Afaik they got self made assets only. ?
just said that above
Ahh. Self made or not (wrt Star Wars) is prohibited.
Well it's not only euler. It's tons of star wars people in there. I doubt they all contributed
@iron flame what do you think about people ripping and renaming your headlamp in their Star wars mod? (Assuming you are the real Mr Sanchez)
https://discordapp.com/channels/105462288051380224/105792634995388416/534383953927340062
I doubt that everyone in that star wars modding group is involved in the crap. Probably just some idiots in their whole group that think it's funny stealing other peoples stuff and pretending they made it
Ah.. The SWOP guys will sure love their stuff being taken and renamed π
Honestly. This is exactly the quality that I expected by both a "star wars" mod and known thieves..
dutch is also known for porting content from games @nimble basalt
You don't really have to say that you are defending anything when you bring even more bad facts about them to the light ;)
Trying to hide the last traces of the attribution to the author after stealing his content.. Wow..
I thought I'd take a small look around the "authors" of that star wars shit.
First guy:
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1294477202
brg africa, isla duala, winthera, panthera, Vietnam, Mondkalbs buildings, Lingor, nziwasogo, Abramia, G.O.S Song Bin Tanh 2.0, SFP objects @sonic blade, Clafghan, Kinhu Island, Pandora and probably half a dozen more.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1116193046
Uk3CB vehicles @sweet minnow, Kiory's balaclava, Rapsu's ILBE assault pack, Sabre's C130
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1360626473
Ripped music from lucas arts.
Second guy:
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1483135920
The stolen headlamps from Sanchez, again renamed to dutch
Third guy:
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1471191071
PLP and Variable.A's Arctic map
Got a PM about the map upload. "We got permission for everything" π€
looks at workshop page 501st Legion has no rights to the maps/mods that are in this mod pack, Cruisie has the rights to the Cruisie head mod, but has no rights to the other maps/mods in this mod pack.
π€ π€ π€
Oh and the 3CB item is already gone π€£
Yeah I'm sure all that stuff is totally legit if it already starts disappearing after just mentioning it here
To be fair I for one was asked by cruise for permission and I gave it to him. After some time he asked me again to make sure I was still okay so I cant complain over him. I know it still is against the workshop eula but I at least he seems to be asking and not just right out stating that they have permissions when they dont (as far as I am aware that is).
Yeah I know he has been asking a couple modders.
There is a list of some on the workshop page
But from the quick glance I had 20 minutes ago I still remember 3 people that aren't on that list. Some of them explicitly forbidding workshop reuploads, I guess that's the reason they are not on that list
Okay I see, just wanted to make sure that at least my part is legit. I dont want to get involved in this but had the feel to at least let you know that it may be legit, and to some degree is.
That doesnt excuse any illegal ones however, so please dont get me wrong.
Okey make that 4 people.. eh.. correction. 6 people. Oh crap, I scrolled down futher. 7 people. Oops nope. 8 people. Ah no. wrong again. 9 people. Ah crap it's really hard to get right.. 10 people..
I should stop scrolling down further now.. This will never end
That's a thing many people don't understand.
If Person A makes something using Person B's stuff. Person A cannot give Person C permission to take Person B's stuff and do whatever with it.
If you film your friend doing something goofy. And your friend allows you to share it with your friends. You cannot allow a youtuber friend of yours to use it in his "dumbest people of the planet" video.
Especially not if your friend told you "yeah you can show it to your friends, but you can never upload it to youtube!"
Not arguing with that. But as I said, I'm fine with my part but dont know about the others. Just thought that it may be the truth as I was asked and thats something that usually does not happen. That does not mean that it also happened to the others as I dont know any of them and I didnt want it to look that way.
Since I dont want to get involved into this any further I'll stop it here. I can see you points though.
Nothing about Star Wars mods are legit.
Yeah I don't doubt that they got permission by some people.
But peoples mods being in there that explicitly forbid workshop uploads. And their names also not appearing in the "we got permission from:" list doesn't make that item look that good..
And then some guy PM'ing me and saying "we have permission for everything" get's a immediate "yeah yeah, keep your bullshit to yourself" return from me
I find it comical when users who infringe on IP rights (Disney / Star Wars in this case) then turn around and get upset that another thief has taken their work.
Yeh
One of the TWC guys contacted me and told me SWOP stole stuff from them..
Sure.. That explains why the headlamp that's clearly stolen from MrSanchez is in there.
And why there is code in there that says "SWOP" and right below that a copy of the same with all the "SWOP"'s replaced.
Playing devil's advocate could that not extend to anyone who models real life IP like the design of a vehicle?
yeah
they ninja removed the headlamp
For example people who model stuff where the IP owner is fine with it being used for non-commercial purposes. The modder who made the model doesn't use it for commercial purposes.
But then the modder gives other people permission to use his stuff commercially. Not even thinking about the IP owner
People always just think in one level. That guy uploaded it, so sure he owns all rights to it right?
Yeah that's a really nice way of putting it.
Playing devil's advocate could that not extend to anyone who models real life IP like the design of a vehicle? Common assumption but wrong, alot depends on the market you "infringe" upon. Disney also make toys and games, including licensing computer games. Toyota and Land Rover (to name a few) dont
You have no change of competing with Toyota by making a model.
I see, so in that case they have less interest because although it's their IP it doesn't take any possible income away from them.
But if you use their trademarks... thats different
In the same vein, certain automakers take the same route as Disney. That is, they forbid any representation of their products outside of designated licensees.
Yeah hence the slight name and logo changes in a lot of games.
One particular company has 3 characteristic traits in its vehicles, if those the traits are represented, legal action is taken.
So, name and logo changes aren't enough
Well most companies will defend their "brand" not their design. A Design need to be patented. And while a shape or design can be registered under current case law its really hard to prove that its a direct copy etc. Which is why the typical route is to prove loss of earnings or impact on brand or reputation.
These design elements are the "Hallmarks" of its product so are registered as such.
Exactly
Much in the same way that Hummer's grilles were. (Hummver Vs Jeep legal case)
but you cant really patent the shape of a car unless its a new revolutionary/unique concept
You can get around some of the issue by using the shape of the vehicle as a registered logo. Its then part of the branding and under case law, a legally defensibly item.
(Unless you are Dedmen and then its part of his insanity defence)
and as such of dubious legal benefit. π
Bingo
In this case, it actually has the name, but even if it didn't.....
Still only a Touareg in a nice frock
Thats the "other" company π
And I prefer the Touareg π
^thats (Cullinan) a BMW
Bottom line... if i make a model of a Cullinan. AND DONT use the logo, or in anyway detract from the company's brand . OR compete in a market place that they already have interests in then there is almost nothing they can do about it.
I love my Touareg
In the case of Star Wars and Disney/Lucas Arts et al, they operate computer game franchises and have established products in the same field. Any unauthorised mod may put thier products and income at risk
i think disney is ok on income
and before anyone says "well a mod will never be as popular as a proper game." Look at DayZ π
they have the income and with that income they pay lawyers to hunt down people that infringe on their IP and rights.
They have a set of rules as to what dictates Fandom and What is defined as "brand/product" impact
I did an engineering contract for Disney in Paris, 3 day project briefing, 10 hours a day. Im not exagerating when i say at least 2 hours per day was concerned with Public perception, Brand awareness and Brand Impact. We were replacing safety sensors and CCTV across their parks and rides.
Its a religion with them
I'd be willing to bet Disney would go after SWOP before TCW anyways since SWOP just blatantly rips content from Battlefront 2 and claims it as their own while TCW creates their own assets and gets permission for anything they don't create. Honestly wouldn't be surprised if EA saw the TCW mod and wanted to contract hire the guy that modeled the UTAT.
If Disney saw Arma SW mods as a danger. They would take down everything. Atleast that's what I would do
yea im sure two of the most ruthless sharks on the market would be flattered to know a good modeler made something of theirs for another game and totally not sue them to hell
(disney and EA)
now more than ever
since the last year's balance just came public and they're losing money on star wars
I'm not saying they wouldn't take down both. I'm saying if they saw good work done by someone, they might consider doing contract work with that person.
Not a developer for anything, just giving my two cents as a player. Take my opinion lightly
I think the topic may have already run its course. This starts to sound like flaming.
do you have a reference what you expected to happen?
I mean you seem to speak of something that has happened before yes?
someone has to DMCA it Id guess
if someone has such a claim
thats how it usually goes
only Dwarden has power to take down workshop mods besides Valve and the DMCA procedure
if you are referering to SWOP then you have to ask him what happened there
but that mod was blatanlty ripping assets from left and right
so that may have played a part
well you have to talk to him about it
just make sure its still there and they did not patch it out
you seem to have experience in the field?
dunno you have a very bitter tone
in what you write
the reporting email is in the channel description. I think that would be the official channel for reporting whay you have found. Or contacting the parties whose stuff is stolen and let them deal with it
like what happens on this channel very often when someone finds reuploads and such they tag the people involved so they can take the appropriate measures
like DMCA
you mean me?
ive spread my knowledge of modding yes, I do not work for them though.
veterancy also does not make anyone any better in any status
this is starting to turn into an ugly circle pit, smashing each others face but without the kickass music...
veterancy also does not make anyone any better in any status
that's where you're wrong. we can post pictures :P
@faint nacelle
there is that ye
π
you guys can take it to DM, starting to go way off topic now
@soft egret something for you? https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1622714184&searchtext=
before you put in any "hard work" you may want to look into if what your doing has inevitable consequences
bud
Kind of
People can buy a licence to operate VBS as a commercial training enterprise etc.
If people are using mods in a professional environment, it's customary to pay the people who provide the content for them to operate professionally
^
Well it wont run in DayZ without modification and we don't allow derivatives
so if it's in DayZ, someone had made a derivative
wut you talk about
VBS is not DayZ
their work and they want to keep control of it
and not deal with some backhanded ports
because we know full well that some idiot will try to port it
so it's there in writing telling people not to try, because we wont allow it
@brisk ember some punk just posted his life server advertisement on TFAR discord. So I looked at the recently uploaded life packs. Found about a dozen gigabyte big packs including that one. Didn't look into them yet. Will post here in an hour or two.
Okey here we go
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1622626310
Enhanced Movement, Citylife @armatec I cannot mention you cuz your unicode name, CUP Vehicles, HAFM, NiArms, Kiory's hats, kka3 ace animations, R3F, RH weapons, SFP objects/bas90, SabreD's aircraft stuff, TRYK, Femal3, CUP Terrains, MELB.pbo, weapons from Massi, TFAR (weird.. They have TFAR in here but also have a seperate TFAR item?), xCam, Ofc the oblicatory shounka,jonzie,ivory car packs, Sahrani, Taunus
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1622714184
Literal plain TFAR copy-paste of the latest release... Even though he already has that in his main pack.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1622501416
Burnes, Bnae, HAFM, SabreD, TRYK, SFP, FEMAL3, Kiory
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1623780814
Kiory, Massi, TF74 Launchers, VSM, TRYK, SMA, Burnes, FHQ, HAFM, SFP objects/wheelchair, NiArms
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1622443949
HAFM, Massi, SabreD, TRYK, Burnes, FFAA (these are the Lythium guys right?), TFAR
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1621619286
Massi, FFAA, TFAR, SabreD, TRYK, HAFM, EWK Cigs, Kiory
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1621260103
Enhanced Movement, JSRS, TRYK, MrSanchez headlamp
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1620923964
TRYK, Kiory, VSM, NiArms
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1511440121 (same author)
Enhanced Movement, NiArms, VSM, TRYK, SMA, Kiory, Achilles, Ares
Mh.. 1st SFOD-D, This is atleast the third reupload that I see by a group with that name.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1619383019
CityLife @armatec I still cannot mention you, SabreD, R3F, HAFM, Burnes
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1618119289
Enhanced Movement, CityLife @armatec :reeee:, NiArms, FHQ, JBad, Kiory, MBG Buildings, RH Weapons, HAFM, R3F, SabreD, SMA, Sahrani, TRYK, TFAR, ALRP stuff
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1538922715 same uploader
VSM
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1617962232
HAFM, R3F, TFAR, Enhanced movement
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1617094646
HAFM, Kiory, Massi, TRYK, TFAR, SabreD, FFAA
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1616725071
Brg Africa, FEMAL3, Jbad, SFP bas90/, RH Pistols, HAFM, Massi, NiArms, TFAR, Enhanced Movement, MBG Buildings, (CUP Terrains bikeys, but no pbo's?)
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1618139187
Enhanced Movement, TFAR, NiArms, Kiory, MBG, SabreD, xCam, Jbad, RH Pistols, SMA, SFP objects, TRYK, Brg Africa
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1623068893
JSRS, SullenSkies, ArmaDiscordRPC.dll @keen trout? Is that yours?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1613596299
Some Terrains, I love how he quotes the "You are NOT allowed to exploit, redistribute and/or modify the content." part of Icebreakr's license in his reupload.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1613069370
CUP Weapons, HAFM, kka3 ACE Exension, NiArms, EWK Cigs, TRYK, R3F, MrSanchez Headlamp, RH Weapons
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1612040490
Kiory, EWK cigs, HAFM, Massi, TFAR, FFAA, SabreD, TRYK
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1607545564
CUP Weapons, R3F, RH Pistols, HAFM, TFAR, TRYK, Firewill
That's just the first page of the workshop...
Should I mention all the guys in there? Kola, Chris, Armatec, Trubb.. Don't wanna be annoying you know
Pushing the ocean back with a broom...
Dedmen, just mention them and let the roast commence
Dedmen one of the links you posted is a picture of the Joker from Batman
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=162244394
HAFM, Massi, SabreD, TRYK, Burnes, FFAA (these are the Lythium guys right?), TFAR
wat
The link takes me to a screenshot of the Joker from batman
lul.. well.. oops π
Also
This one you posted: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1616725071
but evading DMCA
Fixed the joker link. Was missing a number
IP theft has become the motto of modded Life...
That last guy has two other huge reuploads btw
I'm not saying they wouldn't take down both. I'm saying if they saw good work done by someone, they might consider doing contract work with that person.
Not a developer for anything, just giving my two cents as a player. Take my opinion lightly```
That is the equivalent of stealing a police car to show them how good you can drive, in the hopes that they will give you a job. Not going to happen.
Thanks @soft egret
The annoying part is not the ping, it's the time I waste while filing a dmca
That's not at all similar to how I was trying to convey my opinion.
ADV - ACE CPR
Fallujah
Achilles
KP Ranks
3CB BAF
and some more
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1547652319
inb4 another person comes in here going "not all life communities are like that!"
Yeah! not all of them are like that! Just 100% of the first page of the most recent uploaded steam workshop items that say "life" in their name
Except that the PUBG guy did it by himself instead of getting hired. And that DayZ didn't steal stuff from Bohemia
so "exactly" is a bit of a stretch too.
Actually neither of them illegally used someone elses IP
And that changes... what?
It's their right to monetize their trademarks. Though it's not your right to represent their trademark.
Same as someone painted mickey mouse onto a wall in a kindergarden.
The mickey mouse was owned by Disney and they sued the kindergarden for it
yea
Just to add a point of fact: Lucasarts, the original developer and creator of ALL the Star Wars games and OWNER of the DIGITAL IP, is now owned by Disney. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LucasArts
Its not that gray. It really isnt a case by case thing. its purely down to the wishes of the IP holder/owner.
DIsney and Paramount typically say no simply because of competition to their established products and licences
Many IP holders especially media companies have non-commerical guidelines
that allow for mods and fan based mods etc
even the British Army has a guideline for non-commercial representation
Im sorry but i dont understand what you are trying to say.
That's not a gray area, that's just trying to hide from the law.
Well you cant do anything about an issue unitl you are aware of it
Pickpocketing is also a gray area, until you get caught then.
Sure. No one cares about the serial killer in the neighbourhood killing all your friends.. Until you know that he exists?
If you know something is WRONG and you still do it then its still wrong and you only have yourself to blame
Man.. Just have a ultra deja vu.. Did we already have this conversation?
LMAO
No literally... I'd swear this exact moment already happened
Your friend suddenly not answering your messages anymore doesn't tell you that he's been killed
Schrodinger's serial killer LMFAO
Do you know for sure that Disney/EA aren't missing any players cause of Arma mods?
I mean.. If you have tens of thousands of friends.. One guy not answering anymore probably doesn't get noticed that quick
Doesn't mean it's not a problem
Doesn't really.. actually.
Do you like any of the people the serial killer will kill next?
Do you like any of your friends?
The friends that pay for your job. For your food and warm home?
No we wont because its a BS line of discussion. You are attempting to justify something we all know is wrong. End of debate.
I agree. Somehow the guys trying to defend Star Wars mod only have the arguments "no one cares" or "but disney is a bad guy"
Nothing actually valid in the sense of law
You were defending the concept of "theft is ok if no one notices". You may not of stated the mod but it was easily implied from your position.
Im not trying to argue but that really is how you were coming across. Especially with the serial killer comment π
I feel like I'm watching an off-brand episode of Leonard French and the Lawful Masses.
Reuploads of a ton of shit, says he is "awaiting permission", and will not remove the reuploads
http://prntscr.com/m7ohlp
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1559427785
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1559325980
Still won't remove his shit even after getting banned on here by @fossil basalt - he's taking inactive modders as an excuse to reupload shit
you?
no, it's in reference to the screenshot and links I posted
yup
I second Hawkins request. The mods were reported here last year November-December, the uploader banned but no actions has been taken yet to remove these mods from the workshop.
FM banned him from here when he got caught before. He literally warns people not to DMCA him in the description "Warning: Filing a false DMCA is illegal!" - and says they must give him 24hrs notice before they DMCA.
lmfao
I asked him if he would steal mods from a dead author - he said no.
So why should an inactive authors rights be any different?
Doesn't really matter what he says he would or wouldn't do. Fact remains that two accounts of illicit redistributions are still not dealt with.
Yup
Valve has no punishments for it.
Does not mean its right and should not be punished. But thats how workshop and the rules for it are built
IP holders can issue DMCA and take things to court if they want. Valve has no resposibility as the uploader has agreed to the workshop EULA even if he then breaks it
so the uploader is responsible
oh my fucking god, the amount of drama here
it is 100% up to the original IP owner to protect his rights/brand etc
if person A uses your IP, or if person B stole your mod and uses it as his own or it is a re-upload
then fill a damn DMCA
if person C uses ripped stuff, contact BIS or Dwarden directly to get that content removed. If person D uses IP owned by Disney/Lucas, do your part and contact them about that
Channel cleaned up. Feel free to remove posts that make it look like you're talking to yourselves ;)
Once again, Star Wars content and Discussion is prohibited.
Well, you guys kind of brought it up.
The policy is extremely clear.
I just read your rules and the only rule that is close is 3. Which says BI or other developers products.
Wouldn't matter, whatever mods say goes.
@nimble basalt other developers products.
Stolen Content and its discussion is prohibited. This is the last time I will say it.
@soft egret Seki's unauthorised reuploads have now been marked incompatible.
If thats the case why are mods with Humvees allowed on the workshop and able to be discussed about here? AM is openly protective of their IP and made games like squad remove their Humvees.
That extends to a wide margin of mods on the arma workshop when you ask if any of these mods filed paper work to make them.
It was the unauthorised use of the Trademarked name that they objected to. HMMWV and HUMVEE are trademarked by AM
Artistic represenations of items prevelant in popular culture are covered under "fair use." However the unauthorised use of Branding and trademarks is not.
This is worth a read: http://www.hanleybradylaw.com/2014/09/fair-use-in-video-games-part-1-fair-use-basics/
If they had a problem with the names being used wouldn't that make every mod using it be a problem as well?
Its should yes. But most mods arent making millions of dollars. Being cynical, and looking at AM's financial data, I suspect their Lawyers saw an oppurtunity to get a cash injection for use of their trademarks
Ok, I think I'm following now.
You have to understand that pursing an IP infrangement costs money, and pursuing 1000000 of them costs more. So you have weigh cost vs return.
Exactly
A lot of Mods get Cease and Desist letters but never see any further actions
But even IF you make NO Income from your mod, but represent their product or impact their brand in a negative way with your mod they may choose to sue. And if the court sees that "impact" you will lose. Hence AM's claim, "Activision took advantage of its goodwill and reputation by featuring the 'Humvee' and 'HMMWV' brands in Call of Duty and other related content like toys and books. "
IP law can be "grey" on occasion but theri is something called "established case law" that provides guidence for lawyers and judges. This is a record of previous cases proved under law and thet helps direct the result of future cases. There is a lot of case law covering fair use of "artistic representations". And even more of Trademark infringement.
I'm pretty sure i have it so essentially all recreations are technically in the grey area due to past arguments , but if taken to court are usually treated as wrong because the IP holders tend to have more weight due to having money.
Is that right?
Pretty much yeah. But Proven case law in the UK/EU and US have concluded that you may represent an object or design, when 1) no trademarks are used 2) No negative impact to the IP holder's brand or business is implied. (ie how its represented in the public eye) 3) There is no intent, implied or overt to impact on ther IP holder's area of interest. ie No competition in the same market place. ie its ok to make a mod that represents the shape of the car. becuase im not going to be selling/providing that model of the car in the same "environment" as they do business. Computer games do not have the same market as Car sales.
Another example for possible actions would be if you linked someone's product with a negative event. EG All Suicide Bombers use Toyotas. etc
Make sense?
Yep, thanks for the explanation on this.
No problem
this seems to be reporting on all the latest vehicle addons for the life scene. Quite convienient...
pinging @soft egret π
Arma magazine? wtf
OSINT, I like it.
oi, wrong channel for your sarcastic rant, go bother someone else your own age
??? What did I miss?
Not much. Just kids being kids
What's the context?
what? no, it isn't
He might have meant promoting it? This channel is for discussing Stolen Content, but combating it
no, you took it out of context but whatever
Might be best to not speculate and let FM clarify the situation
also @rotund thunder arent you a SWOP developer or something?
and you were already told how to report the things
contact Dwarden or send email to the BI address in the description or let the mod maker know so he can DMCA it
πΏ
lol
π
Thanks for the evidence btw.
And that's exactly why I asked about licenses before even starting any kind of addon creation π
Always ask first. From our rules The first and most fundamental rule is that you must seek permission to alter someone's work, to mirror it or use it in any way other than for personal use. No permission, no editing, no mirroring, no adding to your mod pack, no editing and sharing around your private squad, none of that is acceptable.
So, yes, thanks for asking Kuplion.
NP. π
That also clears up any ambiguity too, regarding asking permission with APL-SA. Always ask! π
Sorry to say it again, but that has to be proven.
Also that was what i reported and i was banned... and all the proof erased.
Q: Did you report it to a moderator, or infringements at BI studio? Or instead, did you get involved in a multiway off topic rant with other "Star Wars folk"?
A: Offtopic rant about who stole a stolen Star Wars mod from whom.
This is why 4 people received a temp ban (to clean up the spam) and another received a permanent one.
Not offtopic at all, and not rant.
I posted proof of stolen and infringements and when the guys of that mod tried to defend themselves attacking for posting proof, i answered them as calm as i could.
As the channel clearly says, i first discussed it here and then i comply with the wrote steps that should be followed.
But now the proof is erased form here to people to see it.
Also why would someone that is a dev of a mod would be banned, accusing without proof? maybe anyone then can do that, i cant imagine what could be done with the ones that are prooven
The discussion is for "Hey, has this guy infringed on "x"?".
When the answer is "yes", an email should be sent to infringements@bistudio.com and a moderator notified.
The wrong way to go about is is to engage in a tit for tat exchange with each group pointing fingers at each other for doing the same thing.
I hate repeating myself. As Star Wars forbids the use of its IP outside of of its designated licensees, any "development (HAHAHA)" of such is prohibited.
Thieves are not welcome.
Well, i never discussed anything. From the begining i posted pictures of proof but now we cant see them as you deleted my messages
And you didnt answer the accusing part without proof to mod developers. Just ban them cause someone claimed that?
Also mail was sent, so steps are done.
Maybe we can continue this in pm , i think
I confirmed it.
π
@fossil basalt would be cool to confirm all thiefs then. Thanks for your time.
All are.
Doesnt seems to be correct seeing how you deleted proof. But ok man. Wont discuss it anymore as you have the "high ground" π
Pufu, pretty sure I saw that guy in this discord
he's kenobi, ya know?
hahah
@carmine folio he is in the discord lol
@languid kelp Hidden from public view is NOT deleted. Please allow me to do my job. Thanks.
[2019-01-15_21:26:35 UTC](#ip_rights_violations)
< tarsulsw#9565 =534381043650789376>
<Message > That is no "mistake" , thats stealing others work and then try to hide it.```
Glad to know that. Thanks
I haven't no, got too much rubbish on my hard drive already
uh60.pbo Seems like Yuri Petrov's stuff
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1332480064
ANZUS GAMING
RH M4, RH PDW, RH ACC @blazing wyvern
PLP Containers
Mirshun cigs
Femal3/Femal3 Uniforms
Xcam
Taunus
TRYK
Enhanced movement
Upload of the dubbing_f.pbo (wtf why?)
Structures_pmc.pbo ???
Various Australia pboβs @dull moon IIRC you said to @ you when this came up
They're also monetizing without being on the monetization list. Donations page is locked behind creating an account
first time seeing that, wow
Ahh, makes sense
BI just hasn't done anything to them
@soft egret Since you last posted about them, they've started monetizing TFAR 0.9.12, just FYI https://www.anzus.life/topic/4332-how-to-setup-server-mods-install-tfr/
No?
Its gone for me as well @flint niche
@sour blade it was a bad link on my end, https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=583496184
That's the correct one
Not sure if the model was stolen, but he clearly says the sounds were.
Either report it to EA or maybe a Moderator can talk to Dwarden to make it incompatible.
Once again, Star Wars content and Discussion is prohibited. Oh man.. Now I understand why all discussion of it is prohibited. Always ends the same.
@proud flicker arma-magazine is a shitshow noone cares about. Actually completely forgot that they exist.
Also no wonder that these life guys with "their own" models are only present on facebook.
Thanks for telling me about that star wars idiot. He's also on TFAR discord, or shall I say.. He was.
@narrow topaz no they didn't. I reported them about 5 times now in the last 3 months. They never changed anything. They have been monetizing TFAR and tons of other mods the whole time. BI apparently doesn't feel like doing anything about it. Feel free to report them too to monetization@bistudio.com
https://s.sqf.ovh/firefox_2019-01-17_10-46-22.png here is a screenshot from the thread RH linked. I reported the thread and I guess a moderator will remove it shortly.
taken from NFS Carbon π€¦
NFS Carbon ripper/uploader has been banned. @river spear
@fossil basalt where do people report content that has BI property in it?
See channel description for mail address
ah ty
I was mistaken in my earlier ban of EvolPunk. He was not evading a ban. His comment about previous ban did not mention that it was temporary. For that, I apologise. @quaint lance
Guy joins TFAR discord. I check his steam. Find illegal workshop upload and ask him to take it down. Nothing happens for 30 minutes. I tell him again to take it down or I'll remove it.
Suddenly 6 people of that Life server join TFAR discord and start to flame. Everyone get's banned, DMCA get's sent.
2 more people join TFAR discord and flame around. Get banned again..
πΏ
Their life server is only a week old π
whats covered by steam when I upload to workshop, like do i have to put in the description, please dont reupload?
still illegeal
oh I also should have asked wheres the full reading of it? just so I know
https://store.steampowered.com/subscriber_agreement/english/#6
6D and 6A are the important parts
oh okay
Does anyone know where V12_ pbo's are from? seem to be stolen from some life server
@wise cairn CUP have a nice large notice :ANY REUPLOADS (STANDALONE OR PART OF MODPACKS) TO THE STEAM WORKSHOP (ARMA3 & DAYZ) ARE PROHIBITED AND VIOLATING THE STEAM WORKSHOP EULA SECTION 6D, AS WELL AS THE CUP LICENSE. REUPLOADS WILL BE TAKEN DOWN VIA DMCA NOTICE WITHOUT WARNING!
ah okay thanks, not really complicated at all
Selling a script. That only works with a modified version of a non-commercial licensed mod.
He is redistributing the mod for free, just selling the script text file. So I guess that's fine?
Okey the non-commercial mod is included in the purchased download.. I think that would be license violation.
@soft egret V12 is a version of King of the hill
Are the mod pbo's called V12_ too? ^^
Clientside mods
No, there are no clientside mods for King of the hill, just coincidence then
Hey this studio is known for stealing maybe look into if they stole anything from the mass effects games.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1559810589
requirelogin=1.. why?
Thought first scam link incoming π€
I dont think this guy made these https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1139157423
I mean they say A3l, ADM, and DAR made them
The author wrote in the most recent comment that he did not create them, he only put them together in a single pack
So, yeah, they're takedown worthy... but, the IP rights of the A3L pack in general are so sketchy that they may not even have a claim to take it down.
Still against Workshop TOS regardless.
Also, @fossil basalt, certain mod which won't be named (you know the one) is still front page on Arma 3 steam hub, 5000 downloads and growing..
Rather than send an email, an actual letter has been sent to Disney regarding the violations. Additionally, it has been reported to Steam and a letter has also been sent to Valve corporate.
Letters are often taken more seriously, especially when they must be signed for.
Just out of curiosity, is there any reason it hasn't been marked incompat? @fossil basalt
Idk what the criteria is for you guys to take that action, just wondering
π
The TCW mod is okay, they emphasize that they only use original content and want people to say if they feel that the content is somewhat sketchy
@runic gulch No, it is NOT ok.
they emphasize that they only use original content and want people to say if they feel that the content is somewhat sketchy Disney prohibit any use of their IP.
Question:
I'm trying to understand all this IP stuff so I can be informed. Would this article be accurate in it's description of how to use IP without infringing on the copyright?
TL;DR
i'd say: don't take the risk... if ou want to play SW themed games, go for battlefront
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
@upbeat whale It is not accurate. As has been mentioned multiple times now, Disney PROHIBIT the use of their IP outside of designated licensees.
Additionally, it is prohibited within Arma as well.
Oh, and those comments informing the illicit uploaders of their wrongdoing, the ones that are quickly deleted, those will work against them in court.
So, if my reading is correct; Basically a mod based on any franchise outside of the Arma's fictional lore and such is prohibited by Bohemia Interactive?
(Not trying to be facetious in any way, just trying to understand)
if the IP holders prohibit the use of their IP
you need permission to use others IP
So prohibitions are based on permission from IP holder rather than the content of the mod?
Forgive me for being a bit slow
no... creating a mod based on someone's IP that doesn't allow it, is prohibited
disney says no to SW fanmade content, you're not allowed to create fanmade content from SW
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
Is an IP holder says its illegal to use their content without their permission, it is then illegal to bring it here to Arma, yes.
In other words, don't bring stolen crap here or it will be banned. Also, we will pass on the details of the offender to the relevant individuals.
mickey mouse is gonna kick your butt π
Coolio. Was confused, now it makes sense. Thanks~

Here's a real gem of one
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1604190921
Ripped content from:
Massi, TRYK Multi-play, TAC Vests, Enforcer, Hiddenidentityv3, MGSR, TFAR, RDS Civilian, Payday 2, Press pack, plus a couple I didn't recognize (Skyline which seems to also be ported/stolen from other games, SFG, FRITH), plus a bunch of cars from some other RP mod or several thereof, and numerous cars form workshop authors repackaged
Prime example of why the Arma 3 content creator community hates the life community
I only noticed it b/c it was on page 2 of the workshop weekly popular items display
Woah
I can see that you're trying to use more parameters, but I did not find any IDs or mentions.
@FM I noticed Sangin has been uploaded to steam you know me I am against my content on SWS at present https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=920367082&searchtext=sangin
@worthy pond
File a DMCA
cheers on it, here is another one https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=698952803
@worthy pond Yup, as @dull moon has mentioned, DMCA it as its yours. That is the fastest ( and most effective) way to have it removed.
(nvm, It seems you've already done it π )
So it's about 11 days tell the monetization expires. Do I just need to re-apply or have they even decided what they will do after that?
iirc for the last few years they just extend approved monetization licenses for another year, so will probably just be that again.
i still hope not ^
it's easier to just expand the current permission than actually coming up with something that benefits ALL
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
I guess I'll go through the approved servers again next week and file a dozen or so complaints.. To help them with making their decision π
@soft egret please do, i lack the time to do that atm
lol - https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1444238073
I'll delete this file, when original mod authors demand.```
how about your read the EULA...
the fucking mentality boggles the mind - i will delete if author asks for that? How about you read the EULA, Steam TOS and figure out that you are not allowed to upload it in the first place
haven't checked but I got the feeling this includes CUP terrains https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1466381603 @dull moon
or at least CUP Core
core maps and cwa yes
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1444233511 bnae, tryk, jsrs, enhanced movement, Enhanced Soundscape
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1448536815 HAFM submarines.
@soft egret @echo orchid @dull moon @chilly silo (and other affected parties, NOT server operators) Could you (if you have time) PM me your reasoning for suspending, amending or allowing the Monetisation program. Things have come up.
Didn't I see that in here yesterday?
yes you did
It's Frontpaged on ws
more LIFE packs...https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1623674975
Just looked a back into the past. We talked about this in june 2016.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=930955594
In march 2018 they proudly announced on their twitter that the DMCA takedowns have been lifted and they can now start having events again.
Let's go on a little Expedition on the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit to see how they are doing one year later.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1345523913
JSRS reupload.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1345571186
Jbad, Fallujah, Kunduz Afghanistan ,Diyala Map, Khogyani, Ghazni Province, Afghanistan, PLP Containers, Arma Tides Manager, Fort Jackson, South Carolina
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1345586636
ACRE, ACE, ALiVE (I think)
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1345595049
HAFM Arma 2 vehicles, EWK M1151, MELB.pbo @echo orchid
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1345555038
VSM @south pelican, HAFM ec635, cTab and some others that I don't know.
Well they sure improved alot in that last year... not.
I let drifter know thanks .
@soft egret this on the description..
If this content in some way breaks the license assigned to it or the license is updated in any way, contact me privately or simply make a comment with valid proof and I will adjust the content accordingly to the license. There is no need to involve steam while me and the authors can resolve the issues ourselves.
"Don't call the cops man!"
and then he'll tell you to fuck off and stop bothering him most likely
so dmca his ass without mercy
why do we have 2 LordJarheads.... Which one to ping...
Best to annoy both π
@fallow stag @carmine folio either one of you is the real one, but see above; JSRS reuploads
who works on HAFM and is present on this discord?
Aplion doesn't seem to be on here?
of course Berlioz is defending reuploads again... https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1512637474
is there any reason why these repeat offenders cant be banned from uploading on the workshop?
Valve
The fuck is going on?
Yes I am. Well it's not the first time, won't be the last I suppose
No, but personally I wouldn't make it easy for them either
Seems to be down already.
wut really?
hahaha okay well that comment worked then I guess
May we ping you if we can catch more of these reuploads?
Yes sure. I would really appreciate it! π thanks for the heads up on this
@south pelican is handling VSM.
https://discordapp.com/channels/105462288051380224/105792634995388416/537301437609148416
That reupload there might be a version that even includes the ripped stuff
I know he is, I've been in contact with him about that one already
I always thought you didn't care about jsrs reuploads @fallow stag
I ignored a ton of them recently becaues I thought that ^^
The uploader said he'd delete it himself so jarrad took no further action
well it got Seki banned...
It's not the only thing that got seki banned
true xD
@soft egret nah I just don't saw them or did not get informed. I don't browse the workshop so often
hot damn 11th MEU took everything down
Even their collection π
maybe they set it on private ?
hm could be
Hi @fallow stag For future action against re-uploaders, can you confirm that you prohibit re-uploads to the Steam Workshop. (It makes things easier from a Moderation perspective)
Doesn't Steams user agreement mean all reuploads are unacceptable?
That is correct. However, having a specific response from a creator negates any counter arguements.
The amount of people that try to say "oh, but I have special permission" ....
without showing it
or the beautiful "Otherwise people can't see the 50 mods I have loaded on my server"
I'll add a text in my workshop items. @fossil basalt you maybe have a template text or something out of your head?
Some guys had a text here.. CUP guys I think
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?l=german&id=583544987
Yeah at bottom of description
Minus the , AS WELL AS THE CUP LICENSE part
nah dedmen, JSRS uses CUP license too now π
OK updated all of my items. Thanks guys! π
What am i missing? He ports an open source mod to a new release of the game, then changes the license and makes it closed and gets but hurt at someone else for doing the same thing he did....
Guess the comment got deleted?
The guy that created that thread hasn't been active for almost 3 years
Check the last 3 messages
And the OP which has some links regarding the matter from the author of that thread
@brisk ember who cares if heβs defending them. The guy does good work, and his points are better than yours are π
A star wars unit advertises in #communities_arma3 what are the chances they have stolen stuff on their workshop?
Yes! You are right! The chances are 100% and you are correct! They do have stolen stuff on their workshop!
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1570032856
@stoic beacon TFAR animations, cTab, Advanced Rappelling.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1590304127
And the exact same stuff a second time for good measure.
@elfin cargo you might wanna remove that. Because if you leave it you also violate #rules which might get you removed from this Discord and the BI Forum...
Also I really don't understand why you didn't just put these mods in as dependencies.. You did that for all the other mods already, what's the problem with adding a couple more
Why is he able to put my Ace extension as requirement, but not the Tfar anims?
@elfin cargo hope you fix that quick
Addons\RH_acc_cfg.pbo
Addons\RH_acc_cfg.pbo.A3L.bisign
BI Thread says: No Steam Workshop
https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/178072-rh-acc-pack/
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1633101052&searchtext=
@soft egret, @stoic beacon, we were trying to make a mod to make it easier for people to just load one mod that would also load the dependencies. Whatever you want me to remove I'll pass it on the the workshop page owner. I apologize, I didn't know it was viewed as stealing. I did not personally create the mod, but it will be fixed. PM me if you'd like
Everything that's uploaded in that item, that you didn't make yourself you cannot upload.
You have to add these as a dependency too, or if they are not on the workshop then you cannot use them
Please remove all kka3_* files.
Also, the Steam subscriber agreement still applies.
You're not allowed to upload anything to steam that you have not created
I did not upload it myself so I did not see that agreement, I apologize for the misunderstanding and miscommunication. I will update you further when the owner wakes up
my response to most of this channel and dayz: https://i.imgur.com/1mLM5jK.png
When you tell a group of people not to do something, they do it anyways. Pretty wishful thinking if the logic is a dialogue box will help prevent people from breaking a license and eula they don't care about to begin with.
But then the "didn't know" thing wouldn't apply anymore
because they confirmed they know. And it was right in their face. Not like some eula thing that you always go "yeah yeah whatever"
In theory, that may work. In reality, they are gonna skip over it like everyone else does when they read a EULA before signing up to something lol
If it is really mostly accidental the cheap DRM method we talked about the other day could be used to inform people and the mod owner could choose the impact. We can as a modding community solve the accidental ones without a massive amount of effort.
It isn't quite catching them when they upload but rather when they run it. Wouldn't stop the actual thefts, would just make them do some work to hide that they have stolen it.
I should add something like the FADE system to TFAR π
become a radio after 10 minutes if you've reuploaded a mod
like the old dayZ hacks that turned people into sheep
I do think a hefty amount of reuploads are just pure ignorance. I've had plenty of people ask me to include ask me to include select pbos for particular uniforms, etc, to one of our groups workshop uploads - and each time, I have to explain to them why I won't/can't do that - and then they say, "Oh okay, I didn't know that".
Outside of the modding community, very few people are aware of the limitations on reuploads and proper usage of IP. Putting a notification on publisher would definitely help stop people who might care but don't know, though it's true that there are still plenty of people who don't give a fuck, and will reupload anyway.
Partially fixing a problem is better than not fixing a problem though, right?
....and I also strongly support @soft egret 's proposal of turning reuploaders into sheep.
Baaaa π
don't you need to agree to the Steam SA when you buy ARMA?
subscriber agreement perhaps (if they arent the same thing π€· )
Iirc you sign it with installing steam
You agree to it, but who actually reads it?
After hearing of "no uploading content you didn't make" clause for the first time (probably from Dedmen π ) I went to look for the phrasing, but I couldn't even find it until someone told me it was 6D.
the subscriber agreement is stuffed with legalese bullshit
legalese or not, it does not matter, if you dont read the agreement, then it will be like spamming in general chat here, because you did not "read the rules"
the point is, nobody reads it, and nobody ever will read it. I highly doubt there is anyone here who actually read all ~8000 words of the steam agreement before uploading
Whoever does not read it and afterwards violate it has to deal with the consequences.
Same goes for every law book. It's freely avaliable for self information. You can read it, you have the opportunity to.
Yeah
That's true
But in the real world, if you want people to stop violating your rights, you need to let them know your rights exist
Sucks that that is the way it is, but it is lol
wont stop the problem, but will definitely decrease the occurences
making a few examples out of violators would go a long way
but that would be bad for business
indeed, i think we had this discussion ages ago - a pop up on publisher would most likely decrease the occurrence of "but i didn't know, i didn't read" sort of bullshit
won't stop it, but will definitely help
BI should only ban the people that reuploaded tons of stuff AND own all the DLC.
There, no bad for business π
