#ip_rights_violations
1 messages · Page 49 of 1
if you have repack that is friends only on Steam
is just a ilegal as one that is public @blissful arch
@royal charm I know. We had a big PsiSyn "adventure" here on discord on saturday. His viewers paying us a "friendly" visit to inform us that he's doing nothing wrong.
So.. Yes. The animations they have are stolen from Kola. And yes they are breaking TFAR's APL license. And yes they tried to monetize all that too.
although they probably are under the table anyway
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

@drowsy hound someone uploaded your Colonial Marines mod https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1574763516&searchtext=
Same bloke also uploaded one of Bushlurker's mods too.
Report Bushlurker uploads to BI and they will mark as incompatible. Don't think anyone has the ability to remove them.
reported both uploads 😄
Is there any issues with VSM/Zenith uploads to SW?
I know they're disgraced on the forums and here, but what about Steam?
Some people go the "once a liar always a liar" road. Which is fair IMO
No VSM/Zenith is considered to be anything other than stolen content
once they got called out on it, they removed their stuff from steam ws
The parts uploaded by Jarrad96 are legit ones
The rest not so much
Even though it still bears the name "VSM"
Okay so can I get a definitive answer if it’s okay to upload on steam? I found an upload of it
by the original author (without the ripped content) yes. if not the original author, no
Anyone want to waste their time pursuing it then?
If it wasn't uploaded by Jarrad96, report them and give Jarrad96 the link
DMCA gets filed, upload gets removed
In other words, the only allowed version of VSM on the Steam Workshop is from Jarrad. Nobody else may re-upload it or edited versions.
^
Question here- The offroad pickups in A3 haven't had their models released for any sort modification, or have they?
Not that I know of
Okay.
Retextures maybe?
Textures are available in the A3 Samples pack iirc
^ Templates yes
Yeah, plenty of retex’s of the base technicals are around, but as far as I know no modified ones with extra parts or whatever
Latest Arma-life news? 23 minutes ago
I believe I have found all the addons causing the crashing on the server, basically PKE had an antisteal script in some of his addons.
Here is the fix:
<download link and screenshot explaining how to download new files with the antisteal script ripped out>
The files with the antisteal script belong to the terrain that they have "permission" for.
Also they removed all kickass mods, because they were crashing their server 😄
🙈
lol... That guy that uploaded Pookie's and Bushlurker's mod: https://i.imgur.com/hrIdcaj.png
someone care to tell the guy what's up? Can't do it since well, blocked...
@soft egret relatively easy to do, in mod pre_init add something like this
{if ((serverName find _x) == 0) exitWith
{
_ok = true;
};} forEach ['Your server name', 'Your other server name'];
if (!_ok && isMultiplayer) exitWith
{
endMission "LOSER";
};```
Could also ! it and just add life 😂
wouldn't it be easier to do that for your server's IP? I mean, someone can copy your server name
Add some delay to end mission as well, an Hour or two
and disable user input
Run it through an sqf obfuscator and there would be Bob Hope and no hope of finding it
Do we have to feed bob?
if (isMultiplayer && {!serverName in ["servername1", "servername2"]}) exitWith {
failMission "LOSER";
};
could have some fun with missionNamespace too
@fossil basalt could you mark that guy's upload of Bushlurker's Terrain incompatible for ArmA III? He gave basically the same response as to my report for the Alien Mod
FM can't. Dwarden can. And he will when you report it
Already done that a few hours ago
Yup, on the list. I added my report to it as well.
just destroy every building on the map xD
I would like to see that guy's face now that there is a DMCA on his illegal upload...
@mint edge Isnt that an older version of you map-creation? (From the look of those islands to the south) https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1557186324
yea i gave out the source to a few ppl
i have no plans to keep working on it
and frankly dont even care if other ppl get their hands on it xd
Ah okay then, didnt know that. Just wanted to be sure
yeeeah ive heard ppl banging their head on terraining tools with it
Wasn't that Chernarus 2035? 🤔 I remember having some nasty mid-mission crashes with that one 😦 Map was so great though
@calm tapir ?
PsiSyn said he and repentz got permission for their server in his video
you know.. Before PsiSyn said he doesn't have anything to do with it
Yea, but so did that retarded kid on Reddit. He edited an autoresponse message from BI
I mean, if you don't want a constant stream of reports, you better show people that you have the permission
Sounds about right
And that's where you are wrong 😃 We can't DMCA but we sure as fucking hell can report you 24/7
Copyright... you need to read up on things
And I thought permissions from people to use their content needs to be publicly displayed
Just remember, if the only excuse you have to fall back on is 'the real owner hasn't said anything yet', you're probably not on very good footing of ownership at that point.
Agreed... If that's the case, boy are they in for a surprise xD
Which I hope they didn't...
Care to share the written permission with us?
As the phrase if the internet goes- 'Pics or it didn't happen.'
@calm tapir so youre not this Papa Hedge person so whats your position in the organization?
ah you just answered that
do you get paid?
@calm tapir Is this for Psisyn / Repentz?
Of course you guys always have permission. Same as the past servers had permission for all the mods they were monetizing. Or how the current server had permission to use kola's animations, or to EBO TFAR.
But this time is obviously a exception, this time you DO actually really have permission...
Just like the last 5 times that were also exceptions until it turned out that it was all a lie
@calm tapir
If it's not for anyone, them how do you specifically have permission?
🍿
We've heard that too many times and seen communication that shows otherwise. If you are both from the "NOT" Psisyn/Repentz endeavour, you can leave now.
@faint nacelle
Not gonna lie, this whole thing feels like a press conference.
We mention Psisyn and now people I've never heard of are speaking. Go figure
Every time
Did we ever tell you the definition of insanity?
They told you where all the scripts are?
Why did repentz write that he has successfully found all the scripts? Sounds like he had to search it by himself.
But I guess that's a repentz specific problem, his wording ALWAYS sounds like he made something by himself, even when he just took things from other people. And afterwards he's always like "I never specifically said that". Yeah right.
was it something like "protection was ripped out succesfully"
@calm tapir
You need written permission from the creator, but you don't seem to have it. Given that other people have tried to do similar previous, what can you give us to prove you're different?
no he didn't say that. He said he found all the scripts and fixed it.
I do believe I asked the Psisyn/Repentz folks to leave. We do not condone thievery.
oh for fuck's sake, can we cut the crap finally??
@calm tapir
Better idea. Have THEM contest the claim here.
Wait, you say we have permission! but you haven't actually seen the permission?
Nor can they produce it.
The bot says to expect a few more who have just joined.
Not like they'd have any impact
you guys do realize you are running in circles like retarded horses in a cage?
How big's the cage?
🔨 x2
awh 😦 /s
Or any subject that requires knowledge
i mean ALL you you. as soon as this name pops up, the chat goes nuts. no useful info at all, same old loop over and over again...
move on already
It's like really hard to not answer :u
i know, i have hard times too NOT to answer (for the good of many)
Just let FM insta-ban
I just wanna help people understand. BUt yeah I know you can't teach an old dog new tricks
no need to, to be honest (ban)
if one of his kids shows up asking "why u so meanies 2 psi, brah...?!?" a simple answer:
"got banned for reasons the admins and mods know about, further discussion leads to a kick or even a ban. NEXT...!"
He was one of the new joiners
Ah, that explains it then
@surreal raptor is with arma-life, just saying
Expect more..
Nooo.... what i've missed! tell me there is screenshot of this bullshit i've missed!
nah mate
wat u missed? Word change between Arma Life Admin and bans of Arma Life Staff
in short
It’s not a side show folks.
still love to have good laugh at brainless life players
It can happen to all Arma genres, but life do seem to be making the same mistakes over and over and over ...
Talking about life, started looking into some French one and found 2 reuploads of tfar already and maybe other mods on the workshop:
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1569357085
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1517698778
Not sure if there is any other mods that should not be there.
Looks like every life server needs to breaking some rule (either monetization, or reupload, or both) to be considered as one...
And btw, in their community, there are modders that are ripping of content from Forza games. Does Forza care about that?
I imagine they would.
Yes, most wrongly interpret the Forza license
Never heard of these. Might look into it next couple days
Thing is, Life has bad practice.. They watch youtube vidoes on how to set up the server and they take the practice from there (Where they already are packing mods). So they believe that okey thing to do. However servers like PSI should have learned ages ago..
Can I ask, now that we're in the Life category again... Why is it that the RP community gets so much hate? I can understand if you give hate to the Devs of these life servers for ripping shit, but why do trash talk the whole playerbase of it? Most of the members are there just to roleplay, as Arma and GTA are really the only RP games out there
Because most of the devs of most of the RP servers do shit.
The ones that don't are rare outliers
And by virtue, most of those playing on those servers defend/support those practices.
Yeh the devs do, but I feel like if you're Member in a community like this, u straight up get shat on
if you're there just to play and RP
the usual lifer when his server / dev staff get's busted:
"F U, all we want is to have fun. why punish him?? we don't care about ripped content"
that's why...
I don't know for others life community but the french one is toxic af, even if they know that mods are being reupload with no perms, they encourage that
If you choose to play on servers that run stolen content, you are supporting the practice.
When players do not care that the servers they are playing on are founded on the stolen content of others, then they are just as much part of the problem.
Just banned one in #general_chat_arma
Okay, good point, why is it that people have to steal content?
why do ppl steal...
Why modders and people cant make mods?
They can't do it themselves and dont want to learn
^
and not all people have all the time in their life to sit and model a car
And they can’t figure out how to use Collections
well, don't use it then, or ask for permission. alternatively create mod collections where the desired models are part of
I don't have the time to work another job. Doesn't give me the right to steal money from someone else.
@orchid bison there is never a time when it is acceptable to take someone else’s content.
Yeah but every one want their own server. If there was a limited number of servers, they surely have enough modders but one is opening every days...
If you can't do something. That means you can't have it. Simple?
Well except you are just a thief and just steal things from other people if you can't have them.
Thieves are to be put into the right place. prison.
this again is a principled discussion we had way to often. to shorten it a little:
there are laws, like REAL laws that protect intellectual property and copyright. if a server admin decides to violate those REAL LIFE LAWS, he get's busted, like every other criminal.
don't have the money to buy booze, you steal it, get caught, get busted
have no car, you steal one, get caught, get busted
want a modpack with cherry picked content, rip it from the original mods/games, get caught, get busted
easy as it is
end
And this should be the end of discussion on the matter.
admin get's busted, server/mod get's shut down, his playerbase gets pissed and attacks us. and you wonder why we don't like lifers...?
wtf did i just witness??
That was some nice magic 😮
New bot 😉
man that anti theft script is amazing
could work with using the command that grabs steam IDs
and if the ID matches someone thats reuploaded a mod, it does endMission or something idk
global ban
😈
Got something here. https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1381545544
Fake Edit: Modpack of Firewill's Aviations.
what? is it not a repack?
Looks like it is, he even said "it just copy/pasting" if you look in the comments. I doubt that guy is capable of doing a mod from scratch...
8k subscribers lol
I DID NOT create any of this kind of points that out
He's incapable of just making a collection instead, apparently :v
But I digress, making modpacks is not very difficult at all. It is essentially just copy->pasting the pbo files from the mods you want to combine and throwing them into a megafolder named Addons.
insert shameless plug
It's like some stupid cartoon show where the supervillain exposes his entire plan in a monologue and then laments when everything goes wrong.
"I would have gotten away with it if it wernt for you meddeling kids"
https://gyazo.com/124ef513703057ede0aa3942c6bc625a was a fun conversation
trying to tell me he will get banned if he just sets up my mod as a dependency
he has to include it in his modpack
https://gyazo.com/12c43c41132d360f58b6a284be5b4ca9 its not even like its hard to add as dependencies... people are just lazy
If you look at the gyazo link just above your post you will see how to do so...
Actually that one is creating a dependent mod for your mod
That said Steam should make the creation of Collections more obvious... as easy as uploading screenshots for example. Right now you have to go to Community>Workshop>ARMA 3 and then select Create Collection. Would be better if it was an option from your profile page or the Content>Collections page from your profile (which it is not...). Again, that said, that is no excuse for not creating collections
https://steamcommunity.com/workshop/filedetails/?id=954247645 this is not how you make a collection xD
Lol
@soft egret ^ TFAR included
@blissful arch I think that guy is talking about the mod information being sent to the server browser. Still, lazy and thievery.
shamelessly inserts plug into @dusk dew
Tanks naigtstulkür I might take care of tht on the weekend.. or next weekend.. or so
Better Tanks
- Advanced Urban Repelling
- Enhanced Movement
- cTab
- cTab Fix
- Grad Trenches
- Moar Stamina x 1st RB Edit
- Revo Reduced Weapons Sway (50%)
- ILBE Assault Pack (TFAR)
- ILBE rf3080 fix
- UH-60 Pack A3 (SOAR helos)
- Under Siege Patches
- Blastcore Compiled (Edited, Extended FIre, and Splendid Smoke)
- CJFT IR No Helmet A3
- Backpack on Chest
- UI Sounds 2
- SWU Immersion (Sounds)
- ShackTac UI
- Realistic Ragdoll
- ACE 3 Extension (Animation & Actions)
- Firewill A10C & AWS
- VQI Bullet flyby
- MH-60
- Kyo MH-47E
- ANZACSAS Weather And Clouds Mod V2
- Rich Discord Presence
Didn't we have something from the same group recently? Or is that just a case of different groups using the same name and same logo
We will include all mod licenses and documentations as soon as possible. Uh.. Yeah.. It has been uploaded early august.. "as soon as possible"...
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1476556280
HLC
VSM
TRYK
Kickass
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1476627285 GG. TFAR reupload. They named it TFAR (you are not allowed to do that) and it's 1.0 (you are not allowed to do that) and it's unmodified (you are not allowed to do that)
Ticks all the boxes 😄
And even a outdated version... Keeping people using old version and giving me reports about bugs that have been fixed long ago
Have my sincere F.U.
There are a few others I scrolled through not TFAR though .
They have a discord. With all their staff on it. But 0 members of their staff are here on Arma Discord 🤔
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1569433393&searchtext=MV-22 MV-22 reupload read the comments
Hey.. A familiar face in the comments.
Yeah can't find a single member of the 1st Ranger Battalion here on discord.. DMCA it is then ¯_(ツ)_/¯
so many reports this week...
Familiar indeed... Someone's gotten salty over being caught thieving
do reports here in discord checked or handled or you must report via email ?
You're best off to email
You can find the email in the channel description
I usually just report through Steam. Doesn't that work?
No.
2nd Steam Report
If it’s your own content, DMCA followed up by an email if they’re improperly monetising (or similar)
BIS on speed dial...
Depends on what you wanna report. If you wanna tell a guy in this discord that his stuff has been ripped, then the E-Mail to BI or the steam report won't help much
for improper monetization mail should go to monetization@bistudio.com
@soft egret Someone reached out to inform me of the CI - not something we were aware of or intended to do. The person designing our mod pack led me to believe it was being done properly. I've hidden it for now to restrict access and will properly remove it once i've finished work for the day.
The intention of having things repacked is to remove features we don't utilize/not handcuff us to updates. For instance when teamspeak broke TFAR for a short time a little while ago. By staying on stable builds of TS/TFAR we don't get any surprises when updates roll out. Is there a way to achieve this same goal without infringing?
No you cannot upload anything that you don't own to the workshop. You have to find other means of distributing your mods if you really need to reupload other peoples stuff.
Gotcha. Would like to extend our apologies - certainly wasn’t our intention to infer ownership or development. Thanks for clarifying
https://store.steampowered.com/subscriber_agreement/english/#6
Here is the wording under 6D
In particular, with respect to Workshop Contributions, you represent and warrant that the Workshop Contribution was originally created by you (or, with respect to a Workshop Contribution to which others contributed besides you, by you and the other contributors, and in such case that you have the right to submit such Workshop Contribution on behalf of those other contributors).
In other words, in no way was what you did acceptable (or legal)
Easy big killer - I can read. As I mentioned previously that was not our intention and will tech steps to rectify the situation. We didn’t maliciously target anyone or usurp credit for financial gain. It is possible to pass on information without condescension. Just FYI. The assumption that those who don’t regularly practice copyright law know its ins and outs is a little far fetched - don’t always have to jump straight on the attack.
It should however be common knowledge you can't just take other people's work and upload it for your own good.
Don't need to be a expert on the law to have the common sense for it
Additionally, everyone has to agree to the Steam EULA.
More importantly @lethal tartan you will find that a repeat will result in a Discord and Bohemia Forum Ban (if you use it). It is no laughing matter.
If only Steam allowed for versioning on the Steam workshop, would take away much of the reason people reupload.
One can dream 😂
Additonally though, if the Arma 3 Launcher allowed you to "Launch with Collection X", that would also take away a portion of the excuses.
to be honest, the responsibility for non uploading broken content lies with the author. Even if they make a mistake and accidently do upload something 'broken', it's no excuse for users to resort to this thievery. You notify the mod author and wait. Users are in no position to take an author's content into their own hands. Ever.
I’ll disagree @royal charm because it sounds like you’re just making excuses for thieves. There’s never an excuse nor a reason for it.
You misunderstand - I'm definitely not making excuses for thieves @fossil basalt
I'm just saying that there are potential changes that would reduce the occurrences. Would never stop everybody though.
Same as active policing reduces murder rate here in my city. Doesn't get rid of it, and active policing doesn't mean "making excuses for murderers" 😆
@lethal tartan You going to rectify the CI too for the other dozen or so mods your mod pack designer so naively put together?
I take that back... it's dozens.
Reread my first message
Directed to Dedmen. Has not a single mention of all the other CI.
“I’ve hidden it for now and will remove when I finish work” my apologies for not tagging everyone involved?
Removing the collection means all the mods.
You don't specify whether you're removing the collection or just TFAR. Don't act like an ass - you're the one in the wrong.
Hidden? They're quite visible
All three of them
Hold on jesus christ
Even your ACE3 mod is full of the shit
All four of them.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1476627285
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1476556280
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1476550069
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1476543239
And what about the Fort Benning one?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1479729400
That map isn't owned by the 1st RB, is it?
Give him enough time to get home from work. If it’s not down an hour after he gets home, Report and DMCA time.
He said he'd hidden them and would sort it when he gets home
He's not hidden anything
That was the point 😉
We’ve got enough info to get the whole operation shut down if he doesn’t.
Alrighty
Hid the collection, not the mods. My bad. Not easy from mobile. Like I’ve said multiple times - I have no intention of not removing them. Save your attorney fees for when you actually need them 🙄
attorney fee's only come up when someone illegally counterclaims a DMCA (which is a fellony)
Wait. Am I mixing things up?
What was a fellony? filing a false DMCA, or falsely counterclaiming?
Both
or if you file a DMCA through a DMCA attorney
DMCA org takes a $200 fee for that lol
@soft egret could start selling Steam Workshop DMCA service
Give me #350 and I'll DMCA your upload
xD

not sure if this has been put here yet but ASN seem to be distributing ebos through the workshop, i thought ebos were against the EULA?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1205468315
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1173971459
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1186960685
see it off
@opal dune report to the email on the channel description
will do
@soft egret you aint passed no bar exam, dont get yoself arrested
😬
Though I could name you a "co-author" and then you could DMCA freely 😂
he released Sources and / or stopped develop of his map
oh I didn't know he released sources
How are there not like 50000 crappy life server attempts?
And then there's Australia again lol
If Aussie isn't going to interact with the Arma community anymore though, no point in acting on it I guess
https://a3chz.blogspot.com/ For the chernobyl map
I have a few questions. Can you license mission files? Are there any restrictions about doing so?
What about dl through website etc. vs when you join a server? IE: Github vs "Recieving mission file" that gets put in your mpMissionCache.
I've seen people upload licenses with mission files before but I'm not 100% how this works.
if it's your code, you can put your license on that sure
Ok, thanks for the quick reply! I assumed that was the case. Just thought I'd ask in-case arma had something hidden in some EULA about it that I haven't seen. I've only ever seen licenses on missions being open and share oriented so no real trouble. 😃
FYI: I've reported two mass mods repacks to infringements@bistudio.com & just recieved an answer from Karel. So it turns out BI have no legal ground in third party disputes, over the re-uploaded to steams workshop mods . No point of writing reports if you are not the original owner. They recommend reporting to mods owners first , so they can file DMCA to Valve. So even if you somehow find the original owner , no one knows if they even take the time and file any DMCA .... The way this works, no wonder reuploaders and such , have so much freedom.
To be fair, the author may not care.
It does bring problems with inactive authors tho
As an example, ACE welcomes reuploads so long as you make sure that they are not identified as the ACE mod
And it is sometimes necessary to remove ACE features that do not work with other mods or modify certain features
That said, they retain the right to DCMA anyone they might want to in the future ofc
Yes but THEY need to dmca. Not some random person who isnt associated with ACE in any way.
Yes ofc
Thats what "The Dude" thinks is wrong. Would be absolute chaos if anyone could dmca anything without being the original owner.
I sort of get tired of people telling me that Steam forbids uploads when the mod owner grants permission to do so too tbh. I understand why people say so... But
And I do really understand why people say that
And sort of agree with why they do. But
BI can't DMCA. They can however set the mods as incompatible with Arma 3
Well. Report the mods to their owners or here for action. I know BI have marked some as incompatible and mod owners here can DCMA. Reporting to the BI email is more about monetization and IP violations of BI IP
Haven't BI said repeatedly that they cannot legally deal with 3rd Party mod issues?
I've reported here, and people recommended me writing to BI.. now you recommend me reporting here? 😉
Did you report to the original IP owners?
I'll just contact mod owners
Thats the first thing you should do
Links to the mods and list the mods involved
That normally works pretty well
Filing a DCMA if you are not the IP owner is iirc a criminal offense
And by the way, nothing wrong in "vigilantes". I would love to see people reporting me about my work when its used without permission and moreover reuploaded.
What?
Wait, what?
Nothing wrong in "vigilates" ? You dont see how letting anyone DMCA anything without being the owner is a terrible idea?
I'm not sure you understood what I meant
what
I never filed DMCA. As you said , it should be done by the owner.
Reporting system is kinda faulty. Thats all.
Not really. BI legally cant DMCA stuff that they dont own the rights too
0 sense in reporting mod infringement to BI other than them marking it as "incompatible"
that email is for people infringing BI IP rights or servers violating monetization.
if I got a IP rights question for ACE3, should I ask here, or on their slack?
You'd probably get a better answer on their slack
okay cool thx
Or their github
oh yea, I think slack would be faster, thx tho
The biggest problem I see is that Steam really needs to make a dumbed down confirmation when uploading work that explains that you're supposed to be the ACTUAL author of the content, because 9/10 of these schmucks just don't get it. I'M NOT THE ORIGINAL CONTENT CREATOR BLAHBLAH SO ITS ALL GOOD! If they're not going to do anything about actually making difficult for people to do so, then they need to include a description that says that the uploader isn't the actual author and call it a day. That way, AT LEAST, if people follow it properly users can discern whether the content is from the original source or not.
Of course I'm thinking from making terrain, maybe that wouldn't even work for everything
In the case of Australia, I don't know why he even bothered taking it down since, if anyone already was subscribed, it's still on their harddrives. So it just leads to this conundrum where people who had been using the mod suddenly either have to scrap everything they had or rely on other ways to supply it to their players(I mean... It's still on Armaholic...). Instead people just keep reuploading it so their players can access it the way they're supposed to.
Like I've said a few times, Steam needs to be proactive about this sort of thing. There's quite a few things they can do to reduce the rate of copyright infringement uploads.
However, that's a pretty unpopular opinion, because some people think that absolves the infringers of blame (which I don't think it does)
blaming them isn't going to do shit if they're not actually being punished for it
and when everyone and their cousin is doing it because tl;dr...
@radiant onyx read this https://discordapp.com/channels/105462288051380224/105792634995388416/517743775599034388
Where you report to, depends on what you want to report.
@royal charm @wild pollen @radiant onyx @paper prawn
Regarding inactive modders, vigilantes. re-uploaders and Original authors..
There is nothing wrong with informing a re-uploader that he is violating the SSA sect 6D. In some cases, the offenders say "my bad" and immediately remove it. On the flip side, those that say that they "don't care", they've just provided evidence of their guilt and their reupload will be marked incompatible when reported (and sufficient evidence provided). If you see work being re-uploaded, report it!
Note: Steam are starting to process some of these reports, so be as specific and mature as possible when doing so.
This brings us to re-uploads (uploads). There are 2 VERY specific instances when something may be uploaded
- When you are the creator.
- When you worked as part of a team (and have permission from each member "that you have the right to submit such Workshop Contribution on behalf of those other contributors")
ONLY THE AUTHOR (or designated rep like PuFu or Chris (RHS/CUP)) may file a DMCA
INACTIVE authors DO NOT lose the right to their content, don't let people fool you.
Re-uploads, 99% of the time Prohibited (but, there are edge cases like ACE).
You represent and warrant to us that you have sufficient rights in all User Generated Content to grant Valve and other affected parties the licenses described under A. and B. above or in any license terms specific to the applicable Workshop-Enabled App or Workshop page. This includes, without limitation, any kind of intellectual property rights or other proprietary or personal rights affected by or included in the User Generated Content. In particular, with respect to Workshop Contributions, you represent and warrant that the Workshop Contribution was originally created by you (or, with respect to a Workshop Contribution to which others contributed besides you, by you and the other contributors, and in such case that you have the right to submit such Workshop Contribution on behalf of those other contributors).
You furthermore represent and warrant that the User Generated Content, your submission of that Content, and your granting of rights in that Content does not violate any applicable contract, law or regulation.```
Grahame, I sort of get tired of people telling me that Steam forbids uploads when the mod owner grants permission to do so too tbh. 9.9 time out of 10, that is prohibited. Very very few mods are made my single individuals. For one person to hand over rights to you for the purpose of uploading would be regarded with scepticism.
@fossil basalt ```ONLY THE AUTHOR (or designated rep like PuFu or Chris (RHS/CUP)) may file a DMCA
INACTIVE authors DO NOT lose the right to their content, don't let people fool you. ```
I don't think anyone was saying anything to the contrary of this
not recently. But definitely in the past
We were talking about inactive authors because, when the author is inactive (and thus there is nobody to file DMCA on reuploads), the reuploading becomes rampant. It's still not allowed, obviously, but it just happens at a higher rate
Its something I see being said quite often on Steam
We were talking about inactive authors because, when the author is inactive (and thus there is nobody to file DMCA on reuploads), the reuploading becomes rampant. It's still not allowed, obviously, but it just happens at a higher rate
They can still be reported.
Aye, they just can't be DMCA'd
Not until the author has been contacted, no. Or in the case of "certain" mods, that Bi administer.
You don't need the author for a DMCA, you just need someone who has his content in there
like the cases where some Map developer gave monetized life servers permission to use his map, but his map was using things from CUP and Mondkalb that can't be monetized
^
Though I wonder about the validity of what @radiant onyx claims Karel said, that infringements@bistudio.com will not remove reuploads unless reported by author?...
That's true yes.
Not completely true, no.
So for example, if TFAR got reuploaded, and you disappeared off the face off the earth, and I reported the reupload to infringements@bistudio.com, BI would not remove it? That seems backwards
Well depends of course. generally they mark as incompatible.
Rarely things get removed, because you have to be 100% sure that it's a violation and that the author doesn't want it
I've had quite a few removed for containing ripped content.
That's what I thought @fossil basalt
But supposedly Karel said otherwise according to @radiant onyx
When the violation is obvious and egregious, it is removed.
One of us has been here a lot longer than the other.
Oh yes, I know you're rather new to the Arma community @fossil basalt 😂
👌
Is there any kind of confirmation that the content is yours when using the Arma publisher? If not... that's something BI could certainly do and wouldn't be that hard to implement. I haven't used the publisher in a while XD
Wouldn't be that big of a deal to have a confirmation and click OK.
Because most of these scrubs are just clueless.
There's not
and we have begged for it for years. But I guess BI doesn't want that
Dwarden once argued they won't put it in because it won't help.
too hard
Enough quality public pushback will work.
Can I ask a question
There is a new altis life server starting up and they've stolen a bunch of scripts from myself and an old development friend of mine
its all .sqf code
Is that bohemias content or mine
Yours, assuming (given it's Life) that you didn't steal it from someone else...
You must be new here... but as I said, yours... DCMA them
I think TLR phrased it well back in the day. They had some background story about "life" that they posted here and there.
Its non-modded.
@carmine folio A solid 90% of all “life code” has been ripped from other authors. That is why very very few people will believe you when you say it’s yours.
A note of warning though, if you file a DMCA on content that you did not create, you are liable to be prosecuted.
This is pathetic.. I wouldn't of asked the question if it wasn't my content.
Many people have, don't act like you're being singled out.
In the oh, 15 or so years that I’ve been here, I can count the number of wholly created from scratch “life coders” on one hand. And that’s not even all the fingers.
You only need to scroll up for a bit to see that we get a significant number of users per month claiming to have created something 100% on their own, only to find that said creations have been stolen time and time again from others.
It’s not that I (or we) am a cynic, it’s that most people lie.
in case someone spots same IP violators on both Arma 3 and DayZ workshop, please drop me msg via DM
@fossil basalt Life servers are a huge part of ARMA it seems like you guys are just pushing them away.
You’ve obviously not been here long.
Most DMCAs are against Life Mods.
The number one thieving community in Arma.
As a person who's spent their entire time in ArmA doing life server stuff, I have to say i've never seen such a cesspool, most people are ok but there's a few key people that ruin it for literally everyone
I think the most dmca'd stuff is from kickass
Mostly seems like young adults or younger trying to make a quick buck
The vast majority of vehicles in life mods are stolen
Oof
Jonzie, Shounka, CharlieCo ... all stolen /ripped content
Jonzie is stolen? Damn i must remove it my friend told me its legit
Any proof of it? I wpuld like to show them why im deleting it, from which game?
But from which game? GTAV?
Is this PsiSyn when Repentz was there by any chance? 😉
Not sure what communities he's at nowadays
Yes
ah, expected then
Now can you see how laughable the previous comment sounds? Life servers are a huge part of ARMA it seems like you guys are just pushing them away.
Life servers aren't just modded servers..
Did i heard rippenz?
The majority of life servers are modded, it's how they make their money. That is why this is the IP Rights Violation channel, because they are always being reported.
This channel has figuratively been "bought and paid for" by thieving Life Communities.
For the less than %10 of honest RP communities, the rest have completely ruined it for you.
Life servers are a huge part of ARMA it seems like you guys are just pushing them away.
🍿
non modded life servers are like what, 1%?
Out of the monetized life servers, the unmodded ones are actually the majority.. But that's just because the modded ones rather steal mods and don't ask for permission than following the rules that they swore to follow.
Unmodded servers with obfuscated mission files aren't that easy to check for violations which is the sole reason why they haven't been decimated yet
out of curiosity how can an unmodded server violate anything? I mean if they dont use any mods?
@delicate ember Jonzie is stolen? Damn i must remove it my friend told me its legit Did you think it was pure coincidence that just about everything that jonzie has exists in the same form with tons of coincidential similarities between the models in other games like GTA or Forza?
They can still use stolen scripts and images and music
Unmodded life servers are the majority, Modded life servers are dying. Mainly in part to sketchy practises and being generally bad quality
@faint nacelle Pay 2 Win servers can violate the EULA / Monetization rules
The only honest and legitimate life server I know of is Granf Theft Arma servers and they are actually pretty fun to play on ngl
I would never call any server "legit". You never know
True but I wouldn't say they are any less legit than any other server out there. I think life in itself can be pretty fun and there is nothing inherently wrong with it as a game mode. I think it just reaaaallly attracts the wrong kind of audience.
and the wrong kind of "devs / thief's"
the wrong kind of "kids"*
You can't say the Life/RP Gamemode itself is bad, it's just like you said... the wrong people.
Yeah, Unfortunately though the people / kids that play and "mod" it bring the reputation of the game mode down with them.
I've met some great life people, character wise. Problem was just that most of them are literal retards.
The thing is a lot of life players only play life. They don't know there is any more to Arma than life. Whereas other game modes the players are a lot more diversified in terms of they play more than one game mode. I think it leads to a lot of ignorance to the rules in place with the game
Imho, problems with "life" servers take their root from the basic monetization rules and mechanics of honoring or striking of modmakers:
There is a thousands of ctrl+c, ctrl+v servers and only a few projects, which try to respect BI and copyright rules. They spend a lot of time and/or money for hosting servers without restricted donations. And every new day you compare yourself with retards, who without any effort take stolen mods and rename a few strings in scripts. And more you spend - more you realize that you are a fu**ing idiot, who wants to keep respecting the rules in a world, where noone else do this.
Why should you do somthing by yourself, if you can take others work, open server, sell few tanks, close it after a month and open again under new name? Even if BI bans their arma key for servers who have profit and don't lose money/time it is not a problem to buy new and reupload mod again.
In my opinion, there should be more stricted moderation or at last a honoring system for them, who try - it could be a way, how developers can show for simple players, that projects who make somthing is better then ones, where is as many mods as admin reuploaded from WS. Maybe some kind of meaning in SitReps or mini chalanges (like MANW)
Is used to play life a lot but more I discovered about their content, less I played. RP missions are good but peoples that run these communities or communities themselves are shit. As said above, all servers that are making original content (and I can count them on my hand...) generally end being ripped off. Life is (for the french community) centered around profits. A friend of mine developed a server for 6-7 months, opened for 6 months. Every thing was, at my knowledge, right: no donations, original scripts and textures, etc. But the community was juste like "Give us ig money for real one", "rip that off", ... I said to not go after this path and he closed. That juste give a general image about life community; they don't care about rules, they want everything and do whatever they want. Milsim are just more mature. They don't care about rules either but there are fewer milsim group ¯_(ツ)_/¯. This is not limited to life server but they are the biggest group.
Ps: sorry if there is any strong language, I just traduced as I can
There are way more milsim groups than life. But milsim's are like.. closed. Not as public facing.
They host mods in a internal repo, there is not really any money involved.
Many of the milsim groups you don't even see
I think they're pretty close in terms of numbers but yeah since they're closed, I seems like they're less but still doesn't change my point (don't know if that was clear): The problem is not limited to life, most of others mods rip off content but they are more discreet.
Also are private reppo dmca-able without being a pain in the ass? If so I may have some links I think
sure you can DMCA private repos.
But what sense would it make if modders would forbid people to use their mods?
Forcing people to use steam workshop for just that one single mod? Most communities I know would rather just drop the mod than getting that one mod from workshop and having to explain that to every member
Oh yeah, but sometimes teams are just downloading every mods that they want on the sws and upload them on their server. In this case I don't see the utility of doing that even more if you're updating it or (if allowed) lessen his weight. If they just upload one or two sws mod in their own pack to have everything in one place, I'm sure that modders are okeyish but uploading the whole sws is just a waste of resources
We get almost all of our mods from SW and put them into our own repo.
For one SW updates when we don't want,
second random SW bugs where it just kills all your mods and redownloads everything,
third mod downloads are deeply embedded into our ecosystem.
Trying to connect that to steam workshop would either simply not work, or we'll have to illegally upload mods to the workshop that aren't there yet. Which, to be fair, some milsim groups are doing. Just use everything from workshop, and illegally upload the rest that isn't there in the form that you need it. But no I won't do that. Ever.
And what about our private mods that we don't want to be public? Friends only workshop item and one guy in the group has to be friends with everyone who might play with us? yea no.
Plus updating a mod is literally copy-pasting a pbo. Workshop is alot more work
Though we also make sure that IF you have a mod from workshop and IF it's the right version, we let you use that. No nonsense duplicate downloaded mods like some stupid groups are doing. No full "modpack" steam uploads like some even more retarded groups are doing.
Fair point, I guess since I play in a very small "milsim unit" (where talking about 6 members stimulating a fictive sf) and using mainly custom mods in addition to 4 sws mods we don't run into issue or unwanted update. So yeah, big milsim groups are not in my field of "competence" xD
And yeah if you have the correct version but in the sws, it's total nonsense to impose the other method.
Reported majority, but some I'm not sure whether to report or not :/
do you actively look out for those?
oh ok looks like it just a single guys ding all this
that's one helluva bad rep
His workshop has two page's worth. I'm impressed.
upload of a million-and-one https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1510168307
Made by your locally recruiting 16th AAB Pathfinding platoon.
@sweet minnow it holds some 3CB products too. Mostly related to ACE
HAFM, NIArms
Thanks
anyone know where I can contact Aplion or Devastator?
@sacred cliff mod belongs to you by the way ^
@brisk ember doesnt include any 3cb stuff, we use the official addons
it's a private pack to save everyone subscribing to 1000 small mods
includes stuff like advanced rappelling and private mods created by the members
the NI arms FAL and M4's
also not supposed to be public so changed that
the 3cb stuff is just ace compatability
again, to stop members having to download 100's of singular tiny mods
create a steam workshop mod collection and let your players subscribe to that. done
doesn't change the fact that you are not allowed to reupload the work of others (rappeling, weapons, ect)
the kka TFAR animations were made by someone in your group?
no
as I said, it's a mix of small singular mods and scripts that is supposed to be hidden and private
and has been for the last few years
doesn't mean you have the right to upload it though. Even if it's set as private. It's still theft.
*piracy
well can remove it if it bothers people so much
it was a very private thing for a long time
I mean unless you want it to get DMCA'd anyway I highly suggest you remove all mods that you don't own the copyright to
That would result in millions of different combinations of content. Whereas just sharing the HTML preset and having a collection solves all your problems
I doubt any mod author is interested in that million of illegal reuploads.
gone
and we do have collections it's just annoying to have 30 odd mods as it looks bad to people interested in joining
High time your recruits stop being so overly picky then.
arma community I guess
I haven't met one player yet that skips meeting a group because the group doesn't illegally reupload other people's content and instead go the legal way with a collection
ok
You guys will be fine with a collection 😉
While uploading of ACE with necessary modifications and assuming you don't make it look like ACE is a grey area, uploading the ACE Compat mods is not. There are reasons why some servers need to modify ACE, no modifications are necessary to the released ACE compatibility mods. Additions sure but you can do your own mod that adds things
Another Australia map >> https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1176120280&searchtext=
Q: What's a good way to say you'll "allow" a breach of ND? IE: Someone stole code licensed under ND but I feel like letting it slide if they use the same license.
I used: CC BY-NC 3.0
As far as I understand it's completely fine for me to let certain violations slide and still be able to act against others.
it is
@carmine folio it is 100% up to you, and letting one slide doesn't mean you necessary need to let everyone slide, nor does it negates your EULA
Ok, thanks! I really just don't want my code, albeit a very small ammount, to end up on something like armascams.net or some shit.
From @clear pike's list.:
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1394736498 3CB equipment @sweet minnow
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1205927714 USAF (who takes care of USAF?) @humble delta That's your illegal reupload...
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1553593415 Firewills jets, HLC, @stoic beacon animations, @burnt oak's ragdoll, JSRS, RH Pistols... @humble delta you again...
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1312957915 EricJ's Blackhawk @humble delta you again....
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1397030307 Same blackhawk again, SOAR MH-47E by konyo... @humble delta you again... I'm starting to see a pattern dude.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1163092237 same MH-47E by konyo... @humble delta still in the game.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1155540284 RQ-11B raven by Faint.. Still @humble delta
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1116662471 Jbad, MBG Killhouses, xCam, something from sahrani, a couple mods by plp... This seems to be the end of the list of @humble delta's illegal reuploads
at some point i should make a template and just dmca a whole weekend long
thanks
USAF is @queen wing and fuller (not on discord i thibk)
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1395610239 HLC, @stoic beacon's animations
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1322001004 @burnt oak anomalies, FEMAL3, HAFM, CBRN mod, tons of Kickass stuff, OPTRE, USAF (Please tell the USAF guy), VSM
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1507578617 Kunduz, Bozcaada, Bornholm, Fallujah, CUP bikeys and CUP license text file?!
at some point i should make a template and just dmca a whole weekend long
not more than 25 a day. dawn (valve) got a little pissed when i filed 50+ a day
https://i.imgur.com/n39F7hR.jpg
@burnt oak
¯_(ツ)_/¯
oh... those where hundreds actually 😂
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1393884020 JSRS, Blastcore. I don't know if @fallow stag has any problems with reuploads?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1391806785 @stoic beacon animations
Okey I'm done with the list
@burnt oak template you say? https://s.sqf.ovh/notepad%2B%2B_2018-12-05_15-31-50.png 😄 (yes no embed to not spam channel)
Yess, thank you
which optre pbos?
OPTRE_Hud.pbo
OPTRE_Emblems.pbo
OPTRE_Iberius.pbo
OPTRE_UNSC_Units.pbo
OPTRE_Arctic.pbo
OPTRE_MJOLNIR.pbo
OPTRE_Optional_SlimLeg.pbo
OPTRE_RemoteExec.pbo
OPTRE_Vehicles.pbo
Do I really need to post all of them? There are 54 optre pbos
hm
@dull moon Please do
Why does valve complain about too many DCMA filings? Are you just supposed to ignore breach of contract**? lmfao
Should tell her to hire more people if she's overworked, rather than ask IP owners to ignore theft.
I'd ask Dawn what her limit per day is and send her one less.
@fossil basalt
do what?
@carmine folio
working a DMCA takes time, and i guess the group of ppl at valve working arma DMCAs is rather small
So, 24? @fossil basalt
@dull moon true, maybe they can make 6D (the golden rule of breakage) bold or something so people actually read it lol
or actually update their policy and ban people from uploading anything after a certain amount of violations 🙃
can't be automated, won't happen
Already asked for this, won't happen...
Personally i'd be happy with the removal of workshop upload privileges. It would save Valve a hell a lot of DMCA processing hence save some money.
Anyone know who handles the reuploads of USAF? These guys just did a copy and paste and claim it's their own xD https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1572656516&searchtext=
@queen wing ^
All of the mods we upload whether we made them or not
Licensing other people's work? Sounds brilliant!
They actually did try to license it! 😂
:+1:
Da fuq... they allow others to upload as long as they honor their license... There's some balls right there: ```License
All of the mods we upload whether we made them or not, are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivativs 3.0 Unported License.
Link to the license - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Below are the guidelines you have to follow:
You are free to:
- USE — use on your own server or in singleplayer
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.```
The hypocracy is real.
oh my god his guy's entire SW history is stolen shit.
@fossil basalt if I'm supposed to report this to you, all his stuff is stolen: https://steamcommunity.com/id/igsapex/myworkshopfiles/?appid=107410&p=1
Is it the same as above? Mr. 2 pages worth?
Do me a favour and don't post in his comments section. It will interfere with whats about to go down. This is directed to everyone.
No @brisk ember Think @fossil basalt is talking about the one Avery first posted
I'm referring to IGS APEX
Anyone know this RedTheDev guy. He's selling cars from Forza for $800 has a website too
Yeah he's been doing it for year(s?)
Actually bought some models
but most are from Forza/Gta
Someone I knew from a community he tried starting claimed he's made over $30k, can't confirm that though
Aren't you the same Hunt3r who bought his old communities domain and tried launching a new life server with questionable content as well?
🍿
@viscid prairie if you can proove he's selling arma stuff. Send me proof via PM. Screenshots would be good. And links.
Wow that guy launched half a dozen life servers this year. Which all went to shit withing a couple months
@sharp musk you do realise that you can’t own rights to something that someone else stole and sold to you right? That also means you can’t use them in your community.
Hey what is in license for dayz with "cant be ported to arma 3" what does it mean? I cant just edit files?
you cannot use any of the content for arma
So you cannot make a arma mod with these files
Damn
Im asking because copy pastes pbo works fine and it was quite unclear
Any reason specyfic reason behind this?
Also noticed apex uses dayz weapons
Any reason specyfic reason behind this?
company decision. even if it is technically possible to "transfer" pbo's cross game, BI just doesn't want it (for now, might change in the future - see ToH content in arma)
Okay got this
Pretty sure I read somewhere that they are working on this.
people are hoping that BI will change their licenses now
Haven't heard anything official about it
me too, they don't need to do much work, you can port almost everything from Dayz to Arma 3 in less than 2 minutes per model. I think it's about marketing. Like why would you buy dayz which is bugged not so editable like Arma 3 + in Arma you have acces to this same equipment. Maybe they could release it as DLC? Like Dayz content pack?
I would rather not allow any dayz to a3 or the opposite but instead open up the a2 pbos and content to be ported to dayz
Too new to allow either games to go back and forth
It's an issue with rights on the assets. Even though it's all within the same company, the licensing on the assets were for the game they were created for. Or in the case of the A2 assets, A2 and the added A3. It's no small task to update the licensing on all a games art assets to then be allowed to be used in another game.
you can port almost everything from Dayz to Arma 3 in less than 2 minutes per model multiply it by at least 100 😉
100 models in less than 2 minutes? 😮
hahaha
😛
@soft egret I can also get you someone who bought from him, with proof. I'll reach out to him if needed
Makes me wonder how you can know that @solemn coyote

SO @viscid prairie @minor herald where is the proof? Didn't get any yet
Their was this last year https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/210159-asking-money-for-pbos/
@fervent moon his kellys island upload contains files from 9 other modders
Most of that is not his. He cannot reupload that
He has 0 rights on that stuff
And saying "No I certainly have permission" doesn't change the fact that he's lying about it
Oh sorry. 11 modders. Overlooked two
Also kellys island was made by a guy called "Andino Mitrell"
How can Cole Slaughter give someone permission over the content that Andino Mitrell and a dozen other people have made?
He can't.
he says he has the open source files
No he doesn't
I have direct contact to two authors who'se mods he illegally reuploaded.
no he doesn't
He might have the source files for the kellys island terrain
but not the other mods that are in there
I can read steam comments.. What's that supposed to tell me?
@raw torrent He had 8 modpacks with illegally reuploaded mods on his steam workshop yesterday.
That's what he got banned for
Now just two are left and he removed the rest
You want an example of what mod?
SFP Objects
-> http://sfp.anrop.se/license/
-> "You are NOT allowed to:" "Redistribute any parts of these packages by themselves, or as part of another distribution, to the Steam Workshop, your website, GoogleDrive, Dropbox or any similar services or channels without explicit written permission."
that's one of them
and it has a VERY clear license that VERY clearly states that you are NOT allowed to reupload that
Wow. Internet fail and my messages got deleted 😄
He cannot reupload anything that neither he or cole have authored
which is like 90% of his kellys island upload
👆🏻
http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=30928
http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=30875
http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=26898
http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=26806
http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=14828
http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=29678
http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=27437
http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=28507
Here are a couple more mods that he reuploaded in there although he has 0 rights on them
@fossil basalt IGS Apex's friends are asking for him to be unbanned because he removed all the reuploads
He can PM me on the Forum
do you have the forum link ?
Hes saying hes currently restricted from posting content hence why he cant pm him..
Wow... it's like "I stole every single piece of furniture from your house and letting other people use it. But now that I got caught, I'll only stop letting the public use it. We best friends now again?". Come on... your "friend" stole assets 8 different mods. You can't do that stuff "on accident". You know what you are doing at that point.
8 mods just in that single workshop item
The other one contained the whole modpack of a spanish life server. And yesterday there were another 8 modpacks full of stolen stuff
8 mods in 8 different uploads or one upload. It doesn't make a difference
theft is theft
imo he can stay banned for the rest of his life. Maybe he regrets it, maybe he doesn't but it'll be a very good lesson for him.
except that it already exists, hence you are not allowed to even upload it to SW: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=539126468
No reason to go at me here bud , i'm just forwarding messages
In particular, with respect to Workshop Contributions, you represent and warrant that the Workshop Contribution was originally created by you (or, with respect to a Workshop Contribution to which others contributed besides you, by you and the other contributors, and in such case that you have the right to submit such Workshop Contribution on behalf of those other contributors).
You're only further digging your friend's grave...
Well hes telling me to , so i'm not doing shit
figuratively, not literally
Thank you very much
You might wanna stop forwarding his messages if you don't want to dig your own grave too
Just doing what hes telling me to do
FM already said what he's supposed to do
Is he your boss of something?
I don't have anything to do with this , i gave you the chance to personally talk to him without me , which you refused
I have no reason to talk to him
Why would we need to? It's absolutely clear he's been stealing mods from others
FM is the moderator here. And he told you what to do
there are 8 accounts of theft up there
Please do
already done, look at the edit.
Well , i'm just saying , talk to him , point him on his wrong and he'll fix it
no need for me to be inbetween this crap
Nah, he can stay where he is now. He steals, he gets banned. Pointing things out works if it's just one account. With 8 accounts of theft I'm sure he knows exactly what he was doing.
Just in , he made a new account and is now talking to FM
In violation of the forum rules.
Additionally, when you are caught red handed and want a reprieve, its advisable that his entire conversation NOT consist of "So whats up". @fervent moon
🍿
Some things are just not supposed to be I guess
@raw torrent you don't have to ask to ask
It would be illegal..
sooo
Just don’t put it on steam
😂
So can I report mod packs that are on the steam work shop
Cause if so we’ll be here all night
Illegal modpack, yeah.
what?
Yeah.. Peoplo who illegally reupload stuff are fucking themselves
we don't have anything to do with it
The steam rules are pretty clear, if you haven't made the thing yourself, then don't upload it.
Collections exist, make use of them.
"So if I steal that guys license plate, and drive around with it, will you report me to the police?"
Yes.. Yes we will.
Goodbye Ayrton
Kinda extreme case but that is the gist of it
I'm well known for my splendid metaphors
Haha
🔨 for the troll
I honestly think he was confused
Kinda weird. How you poke a guy who illegally reuploads stuff, or monetizes stuff, and suddenly his "friends" arrive
Then he failed the intelligence test
just imagine how clean the workshop would be if people that got caught were banned and their stuff deleted...\
Wont ever happen, unless money actually gets involved.
meh, it's kids. How many people here can say they haven't pirated music, found a loophole in a agreement, ect. I'll never agree steam bans are the way to go for something as minor as a re-upload. I always felt that having BI host some sort of authentication server that links original server keys with the original mod would solve almost all of this.
I agree with what your saying Sabre one but what if I used an analogy. Like the first time a kid touches a hot stove the burn they get makes them realize hey I shouldn't touch the hot stove. This makes them realize that hot things can burn them and in the future they no longer act carelessly around hot surfaces. But if we apply the first part of "no ban" to this analogy we get somebody touching the hot stove and nothing happening the kid never learns and eventually will end up burning them self severely. If we then apply the second part of your comment "BI should implement it own system" then we get the same analogy except now the kid has his parent watching everything hot constantly and now the parent has to devoted so much time to watching the kid/hot surfaces that it no longer has enough time to do other things. With that the kid also never realizes what the problem actually is and will just try to touch the stove in crazier ways.
@brisk ember only max 15% of all files in the Arma workshop are unique
Re-uploading is only a escalated issue when both parties make it as such. Rather it's the modder filing DMCA's every day, or the re-uploader finding ways to circumvent the rules. There is dozens of gaming communities that don't have this issue and been around a lot longer on the workshop then A3 has. But if we want to use analogies look at the music industry, remember when they tried to just start picking out random people to bring to court in hopes of scaring everybody into line for pirating music?
To me this is a concern specific for the Arma 3 community. With the main issue is the manual effort it has been to enforce their IPs. Auto-bans will never be the answer as we would literally have no one to play this game besides the modders and the very small fraction that is the milsim community.
literally have no one to play this game You mean the same "no one" as before we got the workshop for arma?
Yes, because it's now the norm.
Only a small percentage of players upload to the workshop and a fraction of that do IP violations on a daily basis
(uploads now being restricted to mods, not missions)
I don't think the Arma community would miss out on much by punishing these
Which I agree, but for every person you hang, there was a dozen of people enjoying there server without any idea of what is going on the scenes.
All they know is their server got shutdown, and whatever speel that host said. Which means 12 less A3 players as the ymove on.
Not like there are enough other servers around that they can switch over
I've never stopped playing a game because the server I had been on was no longer there.
like it literally happens every week when the next greatest life server shuts down because the dev's found out it's more work than they expected and that they can't just keep doing everything illegally
Maybe I'm missing out on something now, but if the workshop had perfectly working versioning support, would there be any reason to re-upload things that are already on the workshop?
If your super market closes. You don't just stop buying food you know
Anybody know the exact date we went live on workshop?
The only case not covered if versioning were there would be ACE @river spear
Workshop for Missions 15th august 2013
workshop for mods 15th July 2014
And ACE's current policy is not to DCMA unless you try to pretend that your version is the official ACE mod
you mean ace because of the optionals? They can put optionals in seperate workshop items
I mean I can't think of a reason to re-upload if it had versioning really
Then everyone could make collections with specific versions of mods without having to worry about an update making the server incompatible
No. You cannotbfor example has ace_medical with Exile. You cannot use vanilla ace_interactions with Epoch or Exile. PBOs have to be removed or modded
ACE is modular. Only reason I see anyone uploading it. Unless their group wants to look "cool" with custom pics in their mods.
maybe epoch/exile should fix their broken code, instead of trying to rip ace apart? 😄
That's a very different issue
Anyway ACE is an old issue that we all know about. Lets not distract from the other issues. Was just answering Optix's question
I can't get all the metrics. But I bet #350 you could make a good argument that A3s popularity was very much increased by being more accusable on workshop.
But personally that can be solved by asking for permission and solving it behind the curtains
As for @river spear The original reasoning, mainly on other gaming communities was mod abandonment (fixes), and or reducing your mod listing requirements.
Rather those reasons are justified and such is up to people. That is just the reasons I heard of.
I prefered the days of ArmaSync personally (seriously)
It is a huge pain when your players cannot connect because a mod updated while you were at work for example. But thats no reason to reupload mods to steam at all
There really shouldn't be, but people have a reason if they are doing it.
Rather it's logical or not.
One change Steam could make is to ask before updating a mod. Would be a huge improvement.
The reason most people have is that it's comfortable
E.g. I could tell my players that ill update a mod at a certain time and they would have the ability to continue playing by saying no not now.
I more think laziness on Steam's part @soft egret
That is why I like my BI Key authentication server idea.
It would at least remove the most common excuse that people use for reuploads in one fell swoop
Basically if you have a re-upload that doesn't match the orgin key on the BI server, it makes it so the server won't function. Bypasses poking Valve, teaches people to use the source mods, ect.
I'm not a network person, so I don't know if it would work, but I'm sure for security reasons either BI or Battleye have some way to match key to key.
You also wouldn't have to care about re-uploads. As they couldn't be used in a dedicated environment. Even if they exist on the shop.
you could integrate the workshop item ID into the bisign. Arma can check that then. Nothing preventing people from resigning.
You can integrate the workshop ID into the pbos or configs, Nothing preventing people from repacking.
Integrate the pbo crawler to check pbos on top of keys?
Nothing preventing people from repacking.
Though it get's more cumbersome for each level
Yea, it would never be perfect
But the goal is to reduce manual enforcement yea?
But honestly.. BI doesn't seem to want to help anyway
Just a warning popup in publisher would already do alot, compared to how it is now
So trying to get BI to help is pure utopia
I dare imagine that Valve doesn't care that much either.
Valve is very much bottom line oriented. If it doesn't line up with keeping the people/projects/companies that bring in the most money to valve happy, they don't care too much.
Figured just as much.
Please don't attempt to justify IP theft by how much Valve or BI care.
I support unilateral bans for IP theft. Sends a strong message to people.
I'm not justifying ip theft.
If anything, I'm embarrassed that on their end nothing much is really happening aside from a few token acts
Unilateral bans are the best message we can give
Scorched earth is my favourite policy
@tacit vortex where did you buy them?
and why
@hasty scaffold ^ upload of your terrain
Can anyone confirm or deny if this is actually stolen? I know @soft egret and @fossil basalt said alot of his stuff is ripped. Jonzie gave me permission to create a military variant of this a couple years ago (and I did), but I don't want to post the military variant on SW if the original is ripped o.O
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=559483781
Yes
said alot of his stuff is ripped Yeah.
Example https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1310405285 Ripped from forza: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rybA54yMPmc
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1310376015 also ripped from forza https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZCjVrq_4os
Very nice to see on the dials (is that the right word) on the middle console, they don't move in game, and for some magic reason Jonzie's ones are in the EXACT same positions as the ones ingame.
So the question whether he rips or not doesn't really need to be asked, I picked the first two mods from his workshop and it's very easy to show where he ripped them from
Ah thanks. I searched for that ambulance car in GTA but couldn't find it. That explains it
Yeah and if you ever see a crown vic that has a crappy back seat(I think the A3L one) it's also from driver san francisco
Yeah. He edited the outside of the ambulance quite a bit. But the switches in the middle of the console are in the same positions as they are in the game from the youtube video you sent
There's like 3 more uploaders (who all know each other) who rip from Forza
well, rip
We've been using our modified version for two years - https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUeqiqTVoAAPByg.jpg:large
Guess Imma remove it then. That's annoying lmao
@heady frigate is this legit: https://www.nexusmods.com/fallout4/mods/36291 ?
Looks like it was authorized by you as it has patreon links etc but never know
You can always use the Laws of War one Hawkins 😃
Believe there is even a photoshop template either from BI or unoffical for the van as well.
Yea it's legit. Pretty sure I've seen that on his Twitter.
@alpine oasis why is there a ton of uploads here, of which ~6-7 are without the author's permission https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1559325980 ? Even Enhanced Movement without any sort of permission?
No permission for ILBE either? Or the SMA-RHS compat?
Also, EM doesn't have an Share-Alike license... That's only if you get permission from him to edit the contents ```modification of the contents of this addon requires the author's (that would be me) permission. should permission be granted the content and derivatives of it are under the APL-SA license.
@alpine oasis
Just a warning filing a false DMCA claim is illegal.
Just a warning, you will be banned from here and the Forum if the infringing content is not removed.
Immediately
Looks like the ACE3, ACEX + compats are legit (per their license)
The rest, not so much
You can check it out here just to make sure I didn't violate anything.
But his mods will still be available..?
Wow SekiGamer. "Hey Lord Jarhead, can I have permission to reupload your mod" "Okey you didn't answer me for 26 hours so I've just uploaded it now, here is the link"
GG
Oh Dahlgren linked that. Me slow.
@brisk ember They've been reported and will be taken down in due time.
Whats the rules regarding distribute mods outside of the workshop? Like Arma3Sync, Google Drive, armaholic etc
If the mods license allows you to redistribute. You can do that
If the license doesn't specify, you can't.
If no license is specified, you can't.
If the license says no, you can't.
Difference is that steam workshop doesn't allow reuploads regardless of what the license says.
Everywhere else (unless the platform has special rules) you go after what the license says
Ah yeah that makes sense, thank you. But how do I stop somebody uploading my mods via ArmaSync if they dont have the permission for it?
DMCA the server owner/hosting company
If it's a monetized server it's easier, just tell BI
FM is putting people on Excommunicado
Heres a upload with a few names I recongnize, but doubt they would give consent - https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1584626597&searchtext=MV22
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1587961756 has TFAR unknown what version @soft egret and others that i don't recognize
Interesting.. Their web page is a "make money quick" scam site
I didn’t even notice that .
Actually over the past year they had a server under that name on like... 5-6 different websites/domains
Their current website (dessancolife.com) also has unapproved monetization
How did you find their website? Google or am I just missing the link
I googled for "dessancolife" that I got from the workshop item title. It finds a couple of Arma server tracker websites. And one of them had the domain of their latest website
https://arma3-servers.net/server/162452/
The workshop item is not in the crawler yet, so I guess I'll wait till tomorrow
would be good
another RP reupload: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1584546758
bloody 12GB..\
@soft egret DMCA is out .... it's not a problem 😉
If you mean SekiGamer.. He shows absolutely 0 signs of wanting to fix his violation
Due time typically means when BI have received enough reports (submitted through Steam) to warrant taking a full day or two to sort them. Addressing 1 or 2 random reports per day really throws off workflow rhythm.
Guy asks me to renew his TFAR monetization permission that I gave him in July because he is renaming his life server.
Instead of permission, he get's back a list of 22 mods that he's running while not being allowed to monetize them.
That happens when you don't watch this life scum 24/7. You give them permission while their modpack is fine, and right after that they add all the not allowed stuff right back. I guess I should recheck the other servers that I gave permission to now...
WOW. I go to do exactly that. LITERALLY first server I ever gave monetization permission to, the first one in my list. I scroll through half their modlist and already have 14 mods that are not allowed to be monetized
Wait..... arma-life.com.. That's the Repentz crap. I gave them permission in July when they were ran by a different group of people.
The lesson is don’t allow life groups to use TFAR
Lesson is don't allow life groups to exist
yea just ban them!
To be fair, I see nothing wrong with those that wholly create their own unique content and monetise legally.
The issues arise when they steal other’s content then illegally monetise it.
Just reported a life server for the 3rd time, that had permission from me.
They stole mods from one of the VERY few servers that really create their stuff on their own
If you are keeping good records let’s see if we can’t prevent them from monetising.
Just so happens that they had permission for 2 mods that have a "If you use any other mods without permission, this permission voids itself" clause. So that immediately doubled their violation count 😄
Please dont hate all life servers we dont all steal content
get him
lol thats how it feels some times BoGuu
I always wondered, in the old citylife store, all those vehicles etc, were they actual vehicles you could drive?
in cl 2 yes
in cl3 due to bis rules you no donate for just skins
and need to build the vehicle
Always above board fella
even have permissions to use take10 models from MS as long as we dont resell the model its self to 3rd parties or allow its use outside our community envioment
gonna need to rethink if there is ever an arma4 though
as its game specific
I thought the monetization rules were older than 2 years
I just wondered was all, no worries, some of them looked awesome
where you pull 2 years from
I remember looking at your store like 2 years ago
Or perhaps less, I don't remember anymore
then it was cl3 and its just skins and you need wheels engines metal bla bla and you build the car with the skin from the in game donation store bis approved the system as everything in our store you can obtain in the game. So there is no pay2win or paywall
been doing cl for over 12 years now and been check rechecked and f**ked over so meany times we need to keep clean and tidy
The cock mobile was a skin 😄 ?
@astral marlin that's why I wrote They stole mods from one of the VERY few servers that really create their stuff on their own 😉 I know you don't all do that. That's why I said "very few" not "none" 😄
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=932255884 yo is this legit?, pretty sure I've seen all of these acc. in other mods
That is Cunico's mod uploaded on Steam... but not by Cunico. No idea whether he gave permission...
Pretty sure that is Cunico, he just has a different name on Steam?
And yeah, Cunico donated a bunch of his stuff to other mods
The Link matches the post Cunico made on the Forum. https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/205138-hidden-identity-v3/
Steam Workshop Download Link: http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=932255884
Here are a few Pictures. These have different ...
Anzus gaming has lost their monetization approval by BI over a month ago now.. And they already made $500 this month from their Store.
🤔 what is BI doing? 😄
@blazing wyvern - headsup, i never know for sure if they want permission from RHS regarding your packs, or mods or something inbetween. A lot seem to be confused by the fact that RH <> RHS
[9:39 AM] PuFu: that is out of the question, 100% against our license
[9:40 AM] Dylan - VILAYER.COM: Nothing I can do at all to be able to?
[9:40 AM] PuFu: no
[9:40 AM] Dylan - VILAYER.COM: Okay
[9:41 AM] Dylan - VILAYER.COM: Sounds also?
[9:43 AM] PuFu: nothing ever made by RHS
[9:44 AM] PuFu: OFP, A1, A2 or A3, our license clearly states non-commercial Arma exclusive```
they always confuse that shit 🤷
Saw a Life server forum where they said they removed RHS because they changed their license (the twitter post that monetization is not allowed) and the list of removed classnames only showed rh_ stuff 😄
hey dedmen not nice lol
I didn't say which life server
lol
Hmm.. so you cannot charge for mods but you can charge for server side addons? https://stokesmagee.net/store/category/2-exile/
You can't charge for anything that went through any BI tools
you can sell text files that happend to be strings
I know... was sort of what I was pointing out... is this one for infringements?
Will let someone else report... guys got too many powerful friends in ARMA for me to get involved
Yes... the one removed from the Workshop @brisk ember
Nor me...
But running persistent servers (A2, A3 and DayZ) I cannot afford to piss off some people
Which I probably already did by highlighting that 😉
DayZ Mod code afaik
Had Optix's stuff in it for LOS anyway
Can't remember whether it had DayZ infected models... I have config.bin definitions in a mod to reskin Ryan's with CUP skins myself which is allowed
@paper prawn
oh, so you actually think it is allowed to use a random zombie thing and reskin it with our CUP skins??
waiting for a meaningful defense speech
c'mon... i know you're there. i see you typing and then all of a sudden stop typing
Can you hold on... Just witching over all the cables to my desktop to show you what I did... which I never thought was an issue... Hold on
config,bin being the important thing
I did not take it as that mate... 😦 So now I am going to justify myself...
nah, really.
all good
Just took a few years off of the poor guy's life. lmao
😄
Otherwise... the Internet never lies and I am a bad guy... 😦
i'm sorry
apparently was more fun in my head than it was in reality 😄
again, all fine @paper prawn
no need for justification 😉
Basically what I do is this... just examples... redefine a couple of your gunbags too to be like the old DayZ small and large gunbag... ```hpp
// Ryan Zombies redefinitions
class RyanZombieCivilian_F: CAManBase {};
class RyanZombieC_man_1: RyanZombieCivilian_F {};
class RyanZombieB_Soldier_base_F: CAManBase {};
class epochz_walker1: RyanZombieC_man_1
{
author = "Grahame";
moves = "CfgRyanZombiesMovesMaleSdrWalker";
vehicleClass = "Ryanzombieswalker";
editorSubcategory = "Ryanzombieswalker";
displayName = "EpochZ Zombie Base";
model = "\rds_a2port_cman\Villager\Villager";
hiddenSelections[] = {"Camo"};
hiddenSelectionsTextures[] = {"\rds_a2port_cman\villager\data\villager_co.paa"};
};
class epochz_pilot1: epochz_walker1
{
author = "Grahame";
displayName = "EpochZ Pilot";
model = "\CUP\Creatures\People\Civil\CUP_Creatures_People_Civil_Chernarus\CUP_Civil_Pilot.p3d";
hiddenSelectionsTextures[] = {"\CUP\Creatures\People\Civil\CUP_Creatures_People_Civil_Chernarus\data\camelpilot_co.paa"};
};
class epochz_soldier_walker: RyanZombieB_Soldier_base_F
{
author = "Ryan";
moves = "CfgRyanZombiesMovesMaleSdrSlow";
vehicleClass = "Ryanzombiesslow";
editorSubcategory = "Ryanzombiesslow";
};
class epochz_soldier_RU1: epochz_soldier_walker
{
author = "Ryan";
scope = 2;
scopeCurator = 2;
displayName = "Zombie RU Soldier 1";
model = "\CUP\Creatures\People\Military\CUP_Creatures_People_Military_Russia\CUP_RUS_Soldier1.p3d";
hiddenSelections[] = {"Camo"};
hiddenSelectionsTextures[] = {"\CUP\Creatures\People\Military\CUP_Creatures_People_Military_Russia\data\flora_co.paa"};
};```Hope this is okay
51 years old... now feel over 60... Thanks very much!
that's perfectly fine, and sorry for stealing your life energy
actually not... i'm demon who lives of from others energy and fear 😄
i'm a CUPicus
😂
someone shoot him
Grahame - 2018-12-16 4:15 PM -05:00
Hmm.. so you cannot charge for mods but you can charge for server side addons? https://stokesmagee.net/store/category/2-exile/
Grahame - 2018-12-16 4:26 PM -05:00
I know... was sort of what I was pointing out... is this one for infringements?
Will let someone else report... guys got too many powerful friends in ARMA for me to get involved
Lol... as dedmen said only if BI tools were used.
TheNightstalk3r - 2018-12-16 4:29 PM -05:00
didn't StokesMagee create that Zombie addon for Exile?
Grahame - 2018-12-16 4:30 PM -05:00
Yes... the one removed from the Workshop @TheNightstalk3r#9141
"No BI tools were used in the creation of my addons. I used Notepad++ and PBO manager." - StoneMage 2018
afaik even pbo manager uses BI tech
@dull moon btw i made the crawler a margin faster
so you dont have to sit there and wait for a CUP scan to finish for 30 minutes
🤘
@dull moon CfgConvert perhaps?
@keen trout
?
possible
One day people will realize it says StoneMage and not StokesMagee
Stonehenge** @oblique mauve
Lmao stokes is a good guy
Selling stuff you create is fine imo, I just wouldn’t do it myself ✋🏻
All, I'm trying to see if I can use these models from 3dWareHouse: https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/user/0587146911948112449301436/Tomme123456789?nav=models
Obviously I need to seriously rework them for materials and to reduce polygons, but that's fine
No license note on there. So you need to ask the author what license he wants to use
The license (https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/tos.html#license) that content creators must grant under the TOS is straightforward. Both Google and end users have a non-exclusive, perpetual, worldwide license to use any content uploaded under the terms of the TOS. If you upload content, in other words, you are granting a perpetual, royalty-free, worldwide non-exclusive license to both Google and those who use the Google 3D warehouse.
HOWEVER
I don't know very well what happens in case the content owner is fraudolent
Google is protected under the DMCA safe harbor for service providers that create access to user generated content
But if I use it, then I can be cited as well
If the owner is fraudulent, he violated the TOS of the platform. So their license also doesn't apply to the content
as the platform cannot put a license onto something they have no rights on.
The owner gives them the rights by uploading to the platform, but he cannot give them rights for something he didn't make
is there a way for me to understand where these models eventually come from? the username Tommy123456789 doesn't sound pleasantly legit.
Not really. You can ask him and he'll say "I made them by myself". If he can show you WIP pictures you can be reasonably confident that they are legit
right...
you can only really proove that they are not legit, by finding the source that he stole from.
Everything inbetween is always ¯_(ツ)_/¯
as usual the answer to these questions seems to be: when in doubt, create your own content or buy it elsewhere.
although with arma it's always hard to find models because even if you buy them, you are not allowed to redistribute them in PBO since those can be opened and models obtained
...kinda.
models obtained Well that's a greyzone I'd say. Opening the models would violate the Arma EULA. So if you binarize them, they are legal-wise protected. Atleast against everyone who follows the rules
And you can't really protect anything against people who don't care about laws
If in doubt you can always directly contact the author and ask if he's fine with how you're using the content
he does give his full name in the description and his name took me to a youtube page that seems to have same content
