#ip_rights_violations
1 messages · Page 34 of 1
Yeah, well its for his community server. The modpack was made by his "devs" though from what I understand.
On their homepage you can find a list of staff members, the guy that uploaded it is listed there too.
No idea to be honest. I think there was something some time ago but dont know for sure what...
@grand oyster
Did you use the crawler?
I'm running it right now, and while its still working it already lists all the SMA pbos...
So I'm sure there's more in it
deepscan and ooooohhhhh what surprise... CUP
bw mod
fhq
ffaa
massi
hlc/niarms
rhs
sfp
unsung
sma
Not sure if I'm correct but it just said: "Reuploads Found: 1040"
Thats quite a bit...
sharing a link to a deepscan filelist shortly
well... GDrive is trolling me... brb+
wtf...? my google drive options disappeared from my context menu
oh great... now google drive decides to check all of my over 20GB of data
but here it is, a deepscan list of the psiexile thingy
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ePW3aZn-lNghWUdsPWSFZ0ypJVGqB0c4
@echo orchid
@serene loom
@carmine folio
@olive sparrow (you're unsung, right?)
the file in question is secondary_weapons.pbo
and i just saw, 3CB is also in there @wary tundra
nevertheless, i'm gonna light him up now
🔥
😈
contains a lot of ripped stuff from mods listed a few posts above like 2h ago
The psi one had that?
is yours?
Yes
i don't quite understand
Me either
I was reacting the the filename you mentioned
The psisyndicate reupload isn’t mine
that i figured, i thought you are the creator of the secondary_weapons.pbo for original exile
or what mod are you from
?
Its separate not exile http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1334412770
Yes created stuff for exile but that works without
uhm... ok... i think there needs something to be cleared:
what is the suppose of all the models in the mod? like CUP_Mk17_short_grip_secondary.p3d
and what is their origin?
@fervent needle
because this was picked up by the reupload filter
Only works if cup is loaded
I can show you source files
false claim
Lol
no i mean the psiexile thingy is not actually containing CUP content, or content from mods i mentioned, but your mod that got me triggered on the other mods
F U C K
@all i mentioned:
false alarm
sorry
Oh I see the issue
Lol
Odd that it got picked up, does it search for close matching filenames?
Ah
and i get triggered easily
Oops
Not easy to pull back I am guessing
Well you have a good track record right?
Lol
actgually it is kinda easy to "take back" a flase DMCA
first i need to get in contact with the uploader and thell him to counterclaim the DMCA. then i'll get a notice from valve and revoke the DMCA
Well you have a good track record right?
?
Of legit takedowns
oh, yes
So its not like you are false takedowns
i destroyed a couple of feelings 😄
All over, just a mistake
But still wanna slide me those dmca tips?
Lol
Gotta file one on it myself
sure. mind if we move this to PM?
👍
That crapbag of an idiot can't even write TFAR correctly. What a useless bag of water...
He made 40k? While using mods that you can't monetize?
@olive sparrow
no, false alarm. i'm sorry
The cup files yes. But what about the HLC and SMA stuff?
addons\hlc_wp_saw.pbo\tex\ui\gear_m249SQUANT_tu_ca.paa That doesn't look at all like a false alarm
oh, you're right. SMA, HLC
I think you should get some sleep 😄
How the hell did it get deleted so fast?
Cause they probably relized their mistake, taken from psisyns discord from the developer: https://gyazo.com/44dc6717787c833842b2fa72eca9157c
@red swan Can you pm me a link to the discord maybe please?
😂
I thought that was going to be taken down?
@dull moon I don't know what should piss me off more, the fact that someone steals my stuff or the fact that they call it "secondary" -_-
Guessing you remember the whole Caden debacle back in -14? @serene loom
Wasn’t it Caiden?
Some of those types are still around, I’ve seen them on the forum.
i recall it only too clearly. was a fun time 😉
the mad thing is that psisyndicate hosted a youtube/ twitch stream session where he interviewed caiden and his mates and the ysat there scratching their heads about - is this commercial use? what's the definition of commercial? etc etc, despite me having sent them all a clear definition of it - anything where goods or a service is provided for some form of reward or benefit (that's a summary of the tax law definition - i previously worked for the UK department of trade and industry as a contractor advising on EU market import rules for 7 years).
so yes, if you offer a game experience, and require or collect cash donations, that is commercial use.
for tax purposes
now in terms of a licensee of software, whose content may be being used in this way, it is up to them to determine how far the user has strayed into how they choose to define commercial
after that whole Life debacle, I produced a sample license for others to use freely, which defines commercial use, and restricts it clearly.
so back then Caiden argued he wasn't acting commercially, assuming that because he was hoarding the money in his personal paypal account and spending it on himself, and not operating a limited company, that legally, he was not a commercial entity, and so he wasn't breaking the license
well it's true he wasn't legally a commercial entity. but how he used the product, to offer a service, and to gain a reward, was a taxable commercial activity.
and to generate, as he did, over £100,000 in 6 months was a blatant abuse of other peoples content released under non-commercial usage licenses. the point of their non-commercial licenses was also to protect the original authors from legal action, for example if they bought or downloaded shareware or freeware from cgtrader and imported it to Arma. somebody then using it to make £100k is going to draw heat on the original author, and their reputation or relationship with artists who allowed their content to be imported to arma.
so there are very good reasons why authors apply licenses t otheir work, especially non-commercial use clauses.
i find it a bit sad if the guy has created a new income generating server which uses non-commercial licensed content, especially if it is without the authors' consent
as it's great to see arma community efforts generating a high stream of players
just a shame if they don't understand and respect licenses
@vocal quiver Heya buddy have any thoughts on this?
this is the preview showing some of the content. hopefully these chaps have secured permission for all of the content they are monetizing
They haven't
this was psi talking with A3 Life people back i nthe day - so he's well aware ofthe risks
they all got banned from BIF and were shunned after raking in over £100k
At least according to his website there is no sign of monitization, only donations for the server itself. Or do you have other infos about their income?
they used kiorys hats, Roberthammer weapons, Tonics mission code and milkmans houses to do that, along with a bunch of ripped models from russian sites. in those days they charged people up to $500 for them to go and rip a car model fro manother game, with menus of what was on offer, on russian rip sites. ifthat ain't commercial, and illegal, i don't know what is lol. anyway that's all well in the past now hopefully.
Maybe its just hidden (as most do today) behind registration etc.
yeah somebody who worked on it told me that they earned £40,000 in the opening week
might be incorrect, might not be, who knows?
main thing is they are a registered monetized server, so they must have permission for everything in their server
i only entered the discussion as it was (incorrectly it seems) mentioned that our content was being ripped.
Oh yep, then you are right. Didnt know/check their registration
god help someone if they take anything from unsung lol
but if anyone sees their content being illegally monetized i am happy to help them have it removed, if they don't know how to handle it. it's pretty straightforward these days now BI has set up the registered status, and steam DMCA takedowns are really fast now too.
They’ve been reported already (Unuathorised Monetisation)
ok good to know. is there proof of the authors whose content was abused?
nice to see the system working well
so the server mod had content made by Gnat, BNAE, HLC, CBA, sykocrazy (MELB), TFAR, ryanzombies, secondaryweapons, SMA, ddr, GR_MUH, etc
all re-signed and packaged by repentz meaning he has effectively re-authored their work and made £40k in profit. jolly well done lol
TFAR and CBA are fine. I don't consider new bisigns as re-authoring. Although the repacking and not giving credits is a little on the line of what I consider acceptible even for mods that allow redistribution.
You forgot no permission to monetise as well.
Oh yeah. Btw TFAR is licensed under APL-SA which is noncommercial.
And I didn't get any requests for permission from psisyn. In case anyone needs more dirt to throw at them for unauthorized monetization.
What a way to flush your entire community down the drain
He really should know better
@soft egret which content do you make out of interest?
TFAR, Intercept, ArmaScriptProfiler, ArmaScriptDebugger. Bit of contribution on ACE/CBA
Ah ok thanks good to know
Sure would be a shame if someone sent a cease and desist template to their server provider for EULA violations, no? @soft egret
There is also a report-button on the monetization list in the A3-forum. That might help too
FM said they were already reported
Reported months ago, yeah.
I'd be pretty upset if someone took my shit without asking and then managing to make a living enough where you can immigrate to another country and buy yourself a house and a nice car.
Oh, and have 100k in my paypal account.
I'll remind them (BI) that its been reported.
If you want to, sure. I'm just annoyed over someone piggybacking of someone elses hard work and being able to make dumb amounts of money off it.
When people say "who cares?" this is the very reason we do.
I don't dispute that, and I acknowledge the feeling is irrational.
@serene loom it wasn’t stolen - was a false positive
The CUP one was a false positive @fervent needle
the rest wasn't
file list showed stolen HLC, TFAR, CBA, SMA
Oh yea all that yes, but specifically what he mentioned was grouped in w/ cup false pos
Chris thought it was cup stuff repacked and uploaded stolen by them - which wasnt the case and he saw mentions for unsung etc in the same pbo and notified others. The full mods that were ripped yes, were not false positives but not what chris stated
I
I'm just curious on this point. How could they make $40,000 in one week? Are they charging access to the server, or just donations? To put this in perspective 1,000 players would need to donate $40 each.
He mentioned something about getting Beta access to their server during testing phases. Propably that
I've seen some servers charge much more than that
Which makes it all the more painful to see them using someone else's creation to make a profit for themselves.
Might be worth it for that amount of money to have a lawyer request damages for a few hundred
You have to be able to prove damages
Just talking about a demand letter, not a lawsuit
Found same Modpack again i posted couple days ago... Reuploaded again.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1334832657
- CUP - Weapons
Its the 3th time i report this modpack.
I remember his Steam profile 😄
hes a big guy now in the Violation thing 😄
@dull moon ☝️
💣
can't scan the item, not know to the database
also, he does not appear in my personal list
it's my "i'm gonna crush your balls in a vice if you dare to upload this stuff again" list
😉
robot santa it is then!
Lmao, he removed my comment about not reuploading stuff
nice
I'll check it later when it is indexed by the crawler. If he has stuff in it, and since he's german, i will talk “tacheles“ with him
🔨
ArmSTALKER IP violation
https://youtu.be/zvqBpD-JwY8
Uses content from METRO game series
P.S. mutant models from METRO Games Series is already inside ArmSTALKER mod
@dull moon 🇩🇪 🔨 
Wait, so if somebody uses assets from another game, that are also in use by another person mod you can strike it?
No.
If someone uses assets they are not allowed to. You can tell valve or bohemia about it and they'll remove it
Here’s a video that talks about consent. Yes, this video is actually about consent with regards to sex, but it does a really good job of describing what consent is and what it isn’t.
If you don’t have consent to alter someone’s work, don’t do it!! ⚠️
https://youtu.be/pZwvrxVavnQ
If you’re still struggling with consent just imagine instead of initiating sex you’re making them a cup of tea. Animation courtesy of Emmeline May at rocksta...
@sinful vector u need report this item directly to 4AGames, I think, that guys speaks russian, u make that easily
lol. it's just a video on the youtube, we do not have Metro 2033 content. And this Realm is just a crook and hater.
@dull moon I'll manually update the database when I'm home
17 o'clock or maybe an hour later if my barber takes too long
🤘
@atomic light I'd recommend you have a read of #rules before you comment further. Thanks.
We really don't tolerate petty drama here, most of us are adults.
Take namecalling elsewhere.
I think before getting too fired up about a mod using content themes or ideas from another game film or book, it is worth considering what you hope to achieve. Many mods and missions published for arma and also any other moddable game will inevitably mimic some other scenario like star wars or toy soldiers or apocalypse now or halo etc. If someone makes a free mod and it contains themes or content or ideas that relate to or derive from a copyrighted material it is up to the owner to decide whether or not to take enforcement action. Many mods operate with a fair use kind of approach, as they are small and relatively insignificant and not commercial. It isnt worth the effort of enforcing your license on a small non com mod. But if a mod is being used commercially then its a different story. Also if say a life server is commercially exploiting your arma non com mod content AND abusing a movie or game from elsewhere, then as part of YOUR enforcement action it may be worth reporting them. Just offering an opinion to balance things out
It’s one thing to create things inspired by another (100% your work), but quite another to take someone else’s content.
In reality some things will get enforced and others wont. I was talking to a colleague at a major game studio recently and they have a map making competition where they give payment to modders for making new maps. One map maker has made a map using sounds from a popular war movie. The game producer is not bothered by that much at all.
Obviously they wouldn’t use that content commercially, but they were not fired up about removing it either.
This is typical of the pragmatic approach you see in the games business
I also have colleagues in the hollywood production company who own rights to the film the map was using music from. Their POV is that it isnt a threat to their wealth or position, but if it was very visible or earning money they would issue a C&D
They wouldnt sue for damages only stop the mod from getting bigger or earning money
I see where you’re coming from, but you also have to realise that those who take others’ content (at least in Arma) will see your example and (attempt to) use that as justification for theft. If we were dealing with intelligent people, they would understand that as “a few people’s feelings” on the subject, whereas the content thieves see it as “they say it’s ok, so it must be”. Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers.
Yeah agreed. I got pretty worked up about arma 3 life back in the day. We got them banned and shamed as far as we could go, but the third party games never once lifted a finger. Am only offering advice based on real practicalities. I’ll happily help a mod author protect his content.
Sometimes i wish i could settle disputes like in the old days...
“you spilled my beer, you buy me a new one!“ - “no, i won't...“ - “let's go outside and see who's buying the next round...!“
🍻
Yeah take it to the trees... like in the military
Its a good idea to pick fights you can at least get a favourable result from even if you dont win outright
Buying the next round Chris? I assume you are paying for the ammo of our duel this time.
i am the one getting payed. a lotta #350s 😉
How would one have rights to something they made, then lose them?
🤔
If Taviana is on steam, it's a good bet it will get removed before too long. Martin comes back from time to time to clean up the uploads. There is no authorised A3 version of Taviana.
anybody can upload anything to steam
oh god, who let mike in?
i still lurk
No idea. I just know he pops in from time to time to check the workshop.
@low pebble If you search for Martin, you can fiend him on Pandemic (Origins SA) Discord
There is a long post about Martin and Tavania (can't remember where at the moment though). I'll try to find it today. You are correct in that Tavania is not publicly available. If you see it publicly available, at the very least use the Steam Workshop report button.
Also, his name is -martin- on the Forum if you wish to contact the author there.
"You catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar"
Vinegar and drop of dishsoap works wonders against flies
Had a little problem with fruitflies, vinegar solved it in a few days
[5:18 AM] TheFlyingDutchMan: ( arma 3 )
[5:26 AM] TheFlyingDutchMan: Or at least lost the rights to the map...
[5:51 AM] LorenLuke: How would one have rights to something they made, then lose them?
:thinking:
[7:16 AM] TheFlyingDutchMan: Bis gave him the rights to do it under certain terms maybe?
[7:16 AM] TheFlyingDutchMan: I dunno i just know it got removed or something and i thought i stumbled upon a illegal reupload on steam.```
lol, how can you loose IP rights? It's your work, if you do not allow forward porting, it's 100% up to the author @low pebble
Nope
i dunno... like 12ish or so?
😄
what did you expect? a "welcome and you are right" hamper? 😂
not really 😄
Those frigging up to no good Germans
@tawny sentinel ups generalization, no bueno
@low pebble there is little you can do without IP rights
It's a joke since a certain someone is German ^^
Think he was manually refreshing it last I heard
@low pebble wrong turn, but do what you wish with yout own time
Nevermind PuFu, you're right. Like usual ^^
@echo orchid moving my stuff to a new box i rented
@low pebble as PuFu is one of the resident experts on IP rights, when he speaks, others listen.
Might want to find a Discord where people eat Tide pods then. Here we appreciate subject matter experts.
🍿
who kicked off 😮
I see who it was
didn't even make sense. He didn't really do much wrong... But then just started trolling FM for no reason
It was the trolling that did it.
Its one thing to have been here awhile and people know when you're joking or not. But when you give a new user legitimate advice and then they act like a fool... we know how that ends.
(Soft Ban in this case)
From what I remember about Taviana, it was never officially ported to Arma 3, someone ported it over without permission from Martin, when Martin found out about the port, he requested it taken down and asked no one to host a server using it. It is now part of a new game Pandemik The Origins
@fossil basalt I couldn't react with the
emoji, sadface
oh wow on unreal engine huh? good for them!
Hi everyone, the bad guy is here (as Tony Montana infamously said) 😃
Well he said something long those lines 😃
I was told by TheFlyingDutchMan that ArmA 3 has a Discord now and that someone has ported my Taviana Island to ArmA 3 again, and since I'm tired of having to contact Steam about it I was wondering if there is anything that can be done about it by Bohemia?
Are there any moderators here I could speak to?
Guess not, well, time to a beer and hit the sack. 😃
@-Martin-#9936 I do not believe moderators are going to do anything mate. You will probably have to go through Steam as usual
@ocean cloud
Since BI holds no rights on your terrain there is nothing much they can do. You can write an email to the adress given in the channel topic, and when they get to it they can mark it as “incompatible“, but not remove it.
Or you could give someone in here written permission to DMCA A3 ports of your Terrain on Steam @ocean cloud
If anyone is willing to create even more DMCA's than they already do ^^
I’ve messaged him directly
I've actually had Valve staff email me before, during a DMCA to clarify a point. they usually respond within 3 days and fully take down any offenders. I think a key factor affecting speed is being able to point to your IP hosted elsewhere with a clear no steam (or no arma in this case) license applied to it. keep a set of prewritten text and just paste it into each DMCA.
☝
Thanks for your help guys, I've read a bit of this discussion and it seems that a lot of guys are having the same problems like me. I guess I will just have to keep DMCAing them. 😃
@echo orchid You work for Bohemia now? 😯
This whole channel is kinda dedicated to people who are having the same problems as you 😄
Yeah I know that. 😃 I'm just surprised by the ammount of people, sure ain't like the days of OFP thats for damn sure.
And this is the 10th most active channel of this discord. Right between #arma3_tools and #arma3_scenario
Life Mods certainly brought some new activity to this channel
😃 😃 Looks like the old days are definetly gone then
I'm gonna go check out the terrain makers channel and see if any of the old guys are still alive. 😃
@ocean cloud hmmm...nope, did some work as external, not atm though
Oh 😃 damn so we won't see any Napoleon DLC or what era those addons you used to make were 😃
i think you confuse me with someone else 😉
ProfTournesol?
Oh yeah, my bad 😂 You're right it was ProfTournesol who made those addons
@ocean cloud Still remember me? Probably the most known dmca case lol
😂 I thought I held that most infamous title but congratulations you beat me. What case did you have?
Remember Desolation? :P
I let it die after moving away from Taviana, did not feel like working on it anymore
Was no your fault though :P Was just my personal burnout
😃 yeah a lot of people don't realize how much effort making mods takes
cough yes cough
back when I first time saw it, I really really thought it fits perfectly the "garrysmod modder generation" mentality
Is it against a policy for a server admin to share my IP address with other players ?
No, it's looked down upon though
If it was merely an Admin, you could point it out to the owner, he might have a different thought
Thank you for your response
Does anyone no of a good gaming VPN. I don’t feel comfortable playing arma anymore
Know*
this is the wrong channel mate, maybe try #server_admins
@clever saddle Proton vpn
Is this the correct section to ask questions relating to legal terms and conditions when it comes to the usage of custom made mods?
Licenses*
it is
Okay, so I've wrote some basic terms and conditions (license) for the use of my custom made add-ons and would like to know if it would cover me.
custom made add-ons = ?
mods for Arma 3
you created the 3D model, the config, and you are uploading something that is 100% your own creation?
Yes
Well in this case it's an pack of animations
that only includes some .rtm files, a config (obviously) and some functions (.sqf) to go with it,
Which was created 100% by myself.
ok, perfect!well, depending on what you wrote and that it respects A3 mods conditions, you write your rules 🙂
Could I possibly show them to get your opinion? Seeming I have no clue really when it comes to legal terms.
same, but this is still the right channel 😄
a) The appropriate amount of credit is to be displayed in a public manner.
b) The content has been allowed (permission) for you to use by Nicholas Jo’Foski.
c) The server is not registered under Bohemia Interactive "Monetization" program. (Unless allowed by Nicholas Jo’Foski)
d) The content (nor any of its parts) is not used in any other add-on or mod (not even partially).
e) The content (nor any of its parts) is not to be modified or altered in any way.
f) The content (nor any of its parts) is not be used for commercial gain.
Any infringements will be dealt with as per Title 17 U.S Code 512, or any other governing legislation that may apply.
Pretty sure that will do the trick, seeming I only want people to use my mods ONLY with my permission, and not allowed to be modified/altered in anyway. As well as credits etc.
But anyone feel free to let me know if anything should be changed or removed.
It would be safer I think if you use a existing license.
Rule c is already taked care of by the Bohemia Monetization rules. Server admins have to ask every mod owner if they can use their mod afaik.
And do you really want that every Arma unit leader has to ask you to put your mod into their Arma3Sync repository? Because they 100% won't do that ^^
a. too vague
b. you cannot restric public use unless it is commercial or any other type
c. vague, there are servers not registered for monetization that still monetize content - do not link your license to something you have no control over
otherwise i would use a proper license as base - CC licenses or BI ones and go from there
@sturdy forum
Okay sweet I'll definitely do that, but all I need to do is have it inside of a text file inside of my pbo correct?
no
no one will unpack your pbo to look at a possible license inside it. Also if your license forbids modifying. Why would anyone unpack it
You mentioned that no one will also ask me for permission to use it...
true
And as PuFu said you cannot restric public use unless it is commercial or any other type
You have a @Mod folder right?
Just put the license directly into that.
and name it LICENSE. By doing that anyone that would want to unpack your pbo has to go through that folder first. And will see that there is a license
Also clearly show everywhere where your mod can be downloaded that there is a license on it
True. however you mention commercial use. I didn't know that you were allowed to sell mods.
Yer thought so, just it double crossed my mind when PuFu mentioned commercial use.
I think he means monetized servers that use your mod
That's most likely it.
As they say, its never wise to wrap your own.
One thing I'd like to point out, you are giving people way too much credit (in assuming that they'll read the license). Once they see that someone has used it, all logic will go "out the window".
feel free to adapt this template i made
use any part of it you wish. it's a CC license with some extra definitions, and references to background / connected BI license conditions
I would avoid the CC licenses as they weren't designed for software. They are also binding, so you can't back out of them once you decide to slap that on there
@Rapumpel#7222 cheers, was waiting on the crawler to be back to batch (well, manual batch that is) DMCA the offenders
@dull moon crawler is back, noticed some CUPPy goodies about
what me to DMCA instead? since the merger should be the same thing 😃
Well, you could, but where is my fun then? 🤔 😜
🙃
Every day PhysX is mentioned the collective ARMA modding community gains a tiny bit of higher blood pressure 😄
oh wow the crawler found some re-uploads of our own yaaayyy!
Altislife Sincity Thailand 2 (v0.3)
uses 411 of our files - awesome!
and they LIST the mods they repacked - that's helpful
Credit mod in server
Burnes Armories - MK10 Landing Craft Utility (LCU)
ASN Motobike Pack [Beta]
ASN Core
The_Unsung_Vietnam_War_Mod
Altis Life Italia Revolution
"well thanks so much for the credit, but you're getting DMCA'd"
Hey so a server called Project Silverlake brought rights for the Nopixel files from a contributor, but the original owner of Nopixel has plans to file a DMCA as they are using all of nopixel files. How will this go down?
The rightful author has the rights on his stuff
If the server guys that bought them don't have a written statement by the rightful author that allows them to use them then ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Do you mean all in a literal sense?
I'd assume the creator of their own files have the ability to sell rights to content they created as long as there wasn't a contract of some sort with Nopixel
¯_(ツ)_/¯
you can probably counter-claim the DMCA if you really bought the rights to use it from the author. But you need to prove that you did that.
It all depends on what kind of agreement was made between the contributor and the owner.
that's hilarious to me
a life server that steals assets want to file a DMCA takedown for content stealing
LUL
Not for arma, especially if the Source is unclear
It's not me who's getting claimed, just a player on the server who heard it was getting DMCA'ed. As far as I'm aware this person they brought the rights from has very little involvement in the scripting and mainly the moddelling however he sold the rights for the map, mission and all other associated stuff. Koil (The nopixel founder) still runs Nopixel as a GTA V server, so technically everything that has nopixel on it is his, right?
depends. The stuff generally belongs to the authors. Him being the founder of nopixel doesn't mean he made all the models.
Unless the model authors gave their rights to him
considering what I see when I search for arma 3 twitch streams, and the amount of vehicles without uv mapping I can safely say there's stolen shit right there.
The model authors are barely even model authors, they just rip it straight out of GTA V lol
So your server is knowingly using ripped models then?
Its not my server 😡 I just play there and am curious if its going to be taken down by DMCA soon
I've only played there literally twice, the owners have made literally thousands using all of nopixels files because someone who contributed to development gave them "rights". I think the situation is just a massive joke. How these servers manage to get on the monetization list baffles me
And its not like this project silverlake is using some nopixel files, They are using all models, textures, map, mission, database and everything. It's all copied and pasted.
that's literally 99% of life servers tho
nopixel itself shouldn't have gotten on the monetization list
I don't think they did
I've never seen a life server using copied and pasted content to this extent and make this much money. I've seen life servers with stolen assets sure, but not literal identical copies. 🤷
Either way, I'm looking forward to seeing how this DMCA goes down.
I know it's not your server.
But now that it's kinda known that they use ripped models and are monetized. I'd say they won't stay monetized for much longer.
They are even running asdg_jr twice. One very outdated version. and one current version. GG. Their modpack is quite big 😄
Wait... They didn't even remove a older version? O_o @soft egret
Well yeah, lifers totally know what they're doing
It's not like they can create their own content or something.
Still waiting for Rockstar to set up monetization rules. They're right now having the same problems with life communities as we did / do. Probably one of the reason why they did forbid mods for a while... until the shitstorm had to come.
I wonder why the life community specifically has such a problem when it at least doesn't seem that the other communities within arma do. Could just be that the milsim and such have very little incentive to rip because rhs, cup, and ace provide everything they need for the most part
@hybrid rock Well, just take a look at the player demographic and that may explain a little more
Because most of the rhs rips i see are "i just want one mod for everything" instead of making a collection, or with proper permissions i guess you could make a arma 3 sync repos.
although if i remember correctly both rhs and cup licenses indicate you can't reupload anywhere
Reading RHS's license, you can upload it anywhere but Steam Workshop. But you may not distribute your own modified version.
Yep, there we go :+1:
same for us. don't change the packaging or name, don't add remove or modify. don't charge for access (without specific written permission - and there would have to be exceptional circumstances)
there will always come these guys who say "screw your license, i'm doing this for the community" lol
"I am violating the community creators IP rights for the community"
That's some circular logic if I've ever seen any.
no thats a pile of poo not logic
I want my 5 minutes of glory and some quick cash if possible, I want to be admired even for that small time window until I get shotdown by DMCA. That is probably why they do it. That and being smartass ofc
Seriously going to rain on someone's parade 😉
rain on someone's parade
now the real question:
what is the "rain" made of? 😉
😂
every community has a set of rules to bind it together. new people wandering in fro mthe wilderness have to take a little time to get civilised. take a bath, get a shave, feed their horse, then get shot in the saloon kinda thing.
i always (always? well maybe often) try to educate them before i reach for my bigiron. but if they've already made 20 grand off of someones work, it's a little too late for peaceful solutions.
what most of these guys fail to realise is that mods tend to come in two main categories - uniquely made wholly owned work and collections of content with many authors/ licenses behind it
we're in the latter category. which means it's a complicated arrangement to allow use, transfer, adaptation etc of any of our content. someone recently asked if they could have our jeep. I asked which jeep. took him a while to answer that, as we have 3 different models by 3 different authors. so it comes down to the one we had donated to us from turbosquid. well we don't consider our team and his team as a single entity, as we don't regularly collaborate, so he'd have to go buy his own license for the shell. then it has 3 different weapons on it, each made by a different author. then my config, and some BI textures and components added.
so in order to use that jeep he'll need a turbosquid license and permission from the 3 weapon authors, and for me to allow him to use my config he could say swap back the texture work he's planning. that would be right and fair.
i don't imagine he'll bother, but i laid it all out for him with a full set of contact details.
so when a "life mod of the month" project rolls in and takes our jeep (like that guy the other day) well, then he's leaving town in a box. the DMCA happens to prottect our content sure, but it mainly happens to protect our reputation with all of the authors we collaborate with.
that relationship is more valuable to the community hell, you might even say that IS the community.
Hello, gentlemen. Can someone clarify - the mod packs with the third party addons are forbidden on steam at any rate or there could be any exeptions?
@mild cobalt You can upload anything to steam as long as its YOUR OWN CREATION or you have PERMISSION from the author of the mod>
Thats the general gist of it. Experts if I'm missing anything be sure to tell em
so, if the one contacts the addon autor and have some proof of his permission, mod pack wouldn't be deleted?
Correct. If you have permission from the ORIGINAL mod author to upload their work, and can provide that proof when someone asks, you should be good
However the permission is only granted to YOU (unless specifically stated)
@mild cobalt You are not allowed to host modpacks as a third party unless you've gained explicit permission from every author who licensed the original pack to the uploader unless otherwise stated.
Thanks for the answer
I'm sure someone more knowledgeable will chime in who knows it in and out during the day so keep a eye out @mild cobalt
it's worth checking the license that comes with the mod. for example ours states "hosting in other places is permitted so long as you retain it in its original form, complete with license and all parts, names and links, with no changes, additions or deletions. But ut also says "do not re-upload to steam." If there is no license, then you must instead speak to the author directly.
The clauses about re-hosting are generally only aimed at those hosting the file themselves i.e. community hosts or private repos as a second party. Uploading other perople's stuff to workshop is asking Valve to host it for you (i.e. Valve is now a third party). Valve themselves require that you are either the rights hold (first party) or are acting on behalf of the first party
they are actually asking for IP rights according to Steam Agreement
“permission” has no legal grounds btw
related: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1362956594
*We are not the creators of the addons included
Credits to the Addon creators*```
http://store.steampowered.com/subscriber_agreement/
```D. Representations and Warranties
You represent and warrant to us that you have sufficient rights in all User Generated Content to grant Valve and other affected parties the licenses described under A. and B. above or in any license terms specific to the applicable Workshop-Enabled App or Workshop page. This includes, without limitation, any kind of intellectual property rights or other proprietary or personal rights affected by or included in the User Generated Content. In particular, with respect to Workshop Contributions, you represent and warrant that the Workshop Contribution was originally created by you (or, with respect to a Workshop Contribution to which others contributed besides you, by you and the other contributors, and in such case that you have the right to submit such Workshop Contribution on behalf of those other contributors).
You furthermore represent and warrant that the User Generated Content, your submission of that Content, and your granting of rights in that Content does not violate any applicable contract, law or regulation.```
in short, even without some rockstart type DMCAing you, steam can take legal action by itself because you are breaching their agreement
@river spear accounts reseted for the workshop crawler?
yes
Due to a unfortunate bug IIRC
I made a major change and sadly it wasn't compatible with the old data
However that shouldn't happen anymore
👍
And yes I recognize that "permission" or "consent" according to the steam EULA doesn't hold any legal ground and whoever uploads it risk being suspended indefintiviely for breaking their EULA, but I question(as a layman and generally someone who knows fuck all about IP laws) what sorts of legal action steam can take when the violation very much is dependant on a third party, but I'd have to look at what sort of precedent exists there, if any.
In a literal sense, you are very much correct and the above isn't a refutation about the overall point you're making PuFu, which I very much agree with when it comes to brass tacks.
doubt that Steam will take legal action against a 3rd party unless there is some damage of sorts. That said, it can simply remove whatever you published if you do not abbide by their agreement, in fact it is legally obligated to do just that if notified/or has information that said content is breaching a law, contract etc
Yeah of course, when we move out of the hypothetically could take legal action about someone reuploading another person's work unto their platform by a third party into reality, the outcome of legal repercussions seems... Less than likely.
Sigh, of course the one time I actually want to use Twitter it doesn't load.
The whole thing seems to be down
One way to download the mods is, but the game and use the WS...
^^
What i was refering to 😉
You're saying but instead of buy quite often 😂
is their retail disk version sold anywhere while there?
if so one needs to install from disk and/or add the key to steam so it gets linked to his account
I heard of someone buying a retail disk once yeah.
He was ripped off.
doesnt say if he bought the key or disk, thats why Im mentioning
only digital
afaik you can only get A3 from steam and bi store and no where else
might be wrong here though
yeah thats all digital
oh he asked if he can get rhs mods somewhere else other than steam, oic.. arrr :sparrow:
duh 😄
there were dvd version at alpha release in russia
it cost something like 10 bucks
or may be i am worng about aplha stage actually
Alpha and bravo where pre-release. If one had a hard copy, he had to buy the final game anyway. Not If one bought the alpha in steam for 25ish with a free copy of the final game
...
Iirc
hard copy of a alpha?
Sounds russian to me yeah.
yep i were probly wrong sorry
preety much time passed since the release
we all grown older
No. I actually believe that russians sold hard copies.
just like they share their awesome mods on steam workshop that they made themselves
Just quick info, If I create a map, and someone takes it and modifies stuff , is ip rights violations ?
I have someone taking my map, not changing the map name or anything and calling it his own ?
Yes. That definetly is a rights violation
Im making a small island called Eden Island
he wanted a preview. an
and now he says hes gunna use it and just "change some stuff"
I just let him know, and he laughed at me
You can't really do more than calling the police. And I don't think they'll care. But you can take down all his uploads as soon as he uploads it somewhere. Or contact BI in case he uses it on a monetized server
hes gunna make a life server with it apparently.
yup
is your map on steam workshop?
will do 😄
👍
sorted
In theory wouldnt adding the workshop crawler steam account and then uploading your map as friends only allow the workshop crawler to find it and index it as well to allow creators to search for workshop reuploads in case their own item is not available on steam workshop?
I have no idea xD
@river spear it can be downloaded using the same account at least, I guess it will apply for friends as well with friend sharing
not sure if I tested our autotest tool with friends only workshop items using our test account or my own...
maybe would also work adding as contributor ? so could keep it private ?
Hmmm that might work
@blissful arch
I assume you can only add friends as a contributor ?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1310791055
contains a uhao.ebo?
https://coyote-exile.com/index.php?/store/category/2-arma-3-exile-premium/
Imma just drop this here.
https://coyote-exile.com/index.php?/store/product/9-mse-3-marid-wheeled-apc/ Does that affect gameplay?
https://coyote-exile.com/index.php?/store/product/10-afv-4-gorgon-wheeled-apc/ Does that affect gameplay?
https://coyote-exile.com/index.php?/store/product/11-viper-gear/ not allowed if you also get the viper Nightvision/Thermal helmets with that (which the preview pictures implies) which offer a clear gameplay advantage. And if others cannot get these.
But overall https://www.bohemia.net/monetization/approved/arma3 They are not approved.
I'd say send email to infringements@bistudio.com or bistudio.net now? I think .net is the new domain.
that's a lot of setup for an exile server which has an average population of 1 player
I already sent the email. And yea, the marid / gorgon would likely affect gameplay, as would giving people rep / poptabs for $ lol
I just figured tossing it here might make the process slightly quicker 😛
I don't think rep/poptabs really affects gameplay. Yeah they can progress faster. But nothing that anyone else couldn't get
Well its the same mechanism as $ in Altis Life which has always been claimed to affect the gameplay
BI only allows things that could never even remotely have any influence
Premium VIPER Gear with unique features:
- Full-Screen Night Vision built-in.
- Full-Screen Thermo Vision built-in.
Notice the "premium"....
if that's not an advantage I don't know what is
Next thing they might add is - Full-Screen Godmode
I mean. I will admit his site looks p nice. But god damn
Violatin like a motherfucker
looks nice? cluttered AF if you ask me 😄
Same template as BI's, at least on mobile I believe.
@soft egret Pop Tabs and rep would as it allows the player to purchase in game gear more easily than a person who can get it normally. Sometimes they also have access to items that are otherwise unattainable due to the amount of ingame currency required
Unless Bi doesn’t care about ingame currency
They do
When a complaint is filed against a mod, the notification will be sent to the email immediately or after a while?
Can take up to several days, depending on Valve. They check every complain manually
No wait... the notification about a DMCA on an item is sent automatically, the takedown is manually
But still, this can take a few days
usually up to 3 if it's clear-cut
Russian life mod*
It's a WS bug. Almost every life mod is ~1GB, but de-facto there is about 15GB of unique content
lol
Yea, the size counter on steam doesnt seem to be working correct
At one point it said IFA3 was only 800mb when its more like 10gb or some wild shit
Steam does compress the downloads a fair bit. But not by that much for sure
It does the same on unsung - the size value is set on your first upload then as you expand content it doesnt ever update. We get complaints and scastic comments from frustrated gamers quite often but i have no way to edit the figure
@pliant oar is there a way to report the issue to valve?
not on the first upload, but yes, something horribly wrong with mods > 1GB
the size in MB shown is based on the last update, not the entire thing. The first publiush to SW is always correct, it fucks about with each update pushed
Aye, noticed it when the Unsung mod went from a placeholder to look for reuploads to the real thing.
yep
so their code is warped basically
and presenting users wit ha bad sense of download time. pretty fundamental for a publishing platform to get working correctly
also afaik it not 100% related to Arma, but with the entire workshop
sub-optimal either way
Today is World Intellectual Property Day http://www.wipo.int/portal/en/ not quite the topic for this channel but still thought of spreading the word
KA's shit is back on the WS
When isn’t it?
"Copywright" wow..
I regret it for sure.
copyright = censorship
intellectual property ≠ propertytheft ≠ theft
¯_(ツ)_/¯
I will never understand how people can be so stupid.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
- Albert Einstein
my alltime fav quote
isn't it anyone's, when you're not on the receiving side?
anyways that guy is just a pest, stubborn and will end up with a lawsuit in the end... if not out of reach
I am surprised he hasn't been banned yet
Who, KA?
if it was up to me, he would be ...
If it was up to me, he'd be missing.
After a visit at a pig farm? Sure 😉
With that mentioned, who governs who has access to the SW? Is it Steam themselves? I'd find it silly if they didn't have a system in place to ban people from specific workshops based on reports/infractions
the WS is unmoderated, and BI as limited access to it. all regulation is managed by Valve itself, and as long no 3rd party (game developer) waves with a cort notice Valve will do shit
i was seeking help from BI and Valve about repeat offenders, got the same answer from both: get a lawyer
¯_(ツ)_/¯
I've haven't followed this artist at all, what did he do?
does*
Violating countles IP and copyrights by ripping other ppls work, from games and shady websites
https://i.imgur.com/tWAIJPJ.jpg
low effort
Low quality as well haha
😂
So... He put a DMCA onto something that he doesn't have any rights on? Have fun I guess 😄
Lifers scam lifers. What a wonderful time to be
😂
@soft egret
Nope, the guy who got caught put a DMCA on the modpack who caught him
Ahhh. Well again Lifers copying other peoples stuff into their modpack 😄 They don't even know what they are copying
Between mod theft and charging for server access, it was bound to happen eventually, would bbbe better if they just disappear.
Before you can trust a lifer server admin/mod creator, you can trust your own farts
👀👀
I like the guy asking "how do you deobfuscate???"
Hey, I gave him a honest answer, didn't I?
lmao thats good
wow what a great way to prevent the seedier end of the life communities from ripping your stuff, just build hidden useractions into all your kit that makes you and infinitely wealthy god in their system lol. if i wasn't busy i'd go and write that code...
hell you could even sell access to your useractions on the darkweb, or just reddit lol
and the nspend the money on a pretty admin assistant to keep your malt topped up and file your DMCA's.
they can simply take only .p3d's, textures and materials and write new configs for them, but in most cases configs are also extractable
lifers... writing... stuff...?
just choose a license that doesn't allow modification and dmca them
So why dont we all go and leave negative ratings comments etc on KS`s stuff if he is so bad?
What use would that be?
Nobody reads this stuff anyway
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1377209005
Ported to Arma 2 by noamles.. But uploaded by a totally different person as Arma 3 mod 🤔
The Screenshots are Arma 2. And in the Video he linked he is shooting using ACE3, using incorrect scope adjustments. Seems completly unrelated to his mod. He isn't even loading that mod in the video.. According to the Arma Launcher seen at the start.
Simply more accurate
🤣
Is it worth downloading just to see what kind of mess this is? I'm kind of intrigued at this point. @soft egret
It was a very good mod back in Arma1
@tawny sentinel download the file list of it first or do you want to have a look at the files
Oh, wanted to check it out if it even worked.
Hopefully, just realized yesterday that the text search didn't work and fixed it lul
Looks like a korean has uploaded an arma2 mod without permission of original authors
Chinese according to his steam
They eat dogs, what'd you expect? 😀
👀👀
Know i asked a little while ago about this guy and my map ?
he thinks changing it a little makes it his o.O
xD
let me fix that for you @Arkensor#0209 http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/079/173/ed2.png
(as in make it visible for allll to see as this is probably my favorite picture in all the internets)
whenever i warn him too he just deletes my comments xD
How did he get you sourcefiles from your map? If you did release your own map on steam, you could check his suspicious "LifeRP Modpack" if it contains any traces of your stuff and fill a DMCA: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1240054209
(it contains the usual RP stuff from RobertHammer, Jonzie, Tryk, HLC etc)
@Cosmo#2029 There is a way to get editable map from compiled one. Not so easy, with lot of boring work with satmap fragments, but it is still easier than creating something new.
I saw a russian life server who did it with Los Santos Island (parody of GTA 5 map)
thats the thing, I gave him an obfuscated pbo, so he could "place buildings" then he started calling it his map, and now hes managed to get the source
im guessing it will get taken down anyway, with RH and HLC in it.
you got the original source files, so DMCA him and be done with it. but keepin mind, you need to be 100% positive about that, because technically you sort of start a legal case then
he also posted this up https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1254401089
may be wort ha look, if he abused other mods, he can get DMCA'd. his empty website makes no mention of monetization registration
so if he intends to monetize, he could also get reported to BI for that
@olive sparrow mostly a3l stuff in there
lots of that stuff
B7A134A6073E6263185E650F060CBD52A7FC9860 \addons\a3l_bank.pbo
F606C22AB022724F71B338EFE1DDCB16BA00BEF3 \addons\A3L_Bars.pbo
4A39687A8CF03C25D1820C18A8D5B8CCB9793FC3 \addons\A3L_Box.pbo
BFB05FA57518B60760C68BDB1FDD4831508EC338 \addons\A3L_BTTF.pbo
33668AEA8757264157D160B56D5DE6E1740B2732 \addons\a3l_challenger.pbo
2F051ED4B5A841964E28E2F5D022D085EB74D260 \addons\a3l_christmas.pbo
22E7F60F2D891D722C92017F280DF39A602F44DF \addons\a3l_civ10.pbo
945007452B041FD94BAA3FBA1C39DE3FC6AADA4D \addons\a3l_civ25.pbo
F1F238EA60D89F1B42221D3333B70A3526E14C61 \addons\a3l_civ4.pbo
3C3A1D204FDCA2B59E144B6D4D157313C1ACE8B4 \addons\a3l_civ5.pbo
91DE7DFC191BE61A8DF7EEC82288F04F04A1CA0F \addons\A3L_Crops.pbo
4D7B46A2C32802C516540105D8BB5B3737701633 \addons\A3L_EMTMain.pbo
3A8A340C0E29AD1FF25068EB926C4D4B0EADC908 \addons\a3l_extinguisher.pbo
664E04AC096695C4B4EEA5FBD43CE0BFA9A36326 \addons\A3L_FordKa.pbo
5827610909558341E76912FBEF70EC4147115F40 \addons\A3L_Ford_Raptor.pbo
E44CDBE30F08B808D623F955960132A19C65CF52 \addons\A3L_HAFM_EC635.pbo
99DA823C02E8DC2AD7B47BCA2EA704257BF95C3B \addons\A3L_HardHat.pbo
8275D0672361DAB8E960FBFD1BC2405A440A2021 \addons\a3l_hospitalbed.pbo
B78684D46E8CB2733E81EBC48258C8654992547F \addons\A3L_JackHammer.pbo
F403BEB57223E1E2A2533A5FB9842A66A0A1C8A1 \addons\a3l_jailbus.pbo
F721770550B917297C606265C33F3A26A4ECEBAB \addons\a3l_ladder.pbo
A609C03D01F3ABC1EF7476D95084442F77AEA00C \addons\A3L_ManuMachine.pbo
BC20EA971EF9FAE49C45E63C6176FB704261E1A7 \addons\A3L_Map_Markers.pbo
E6A53D4E8F397B3B95937F4D81B4CF4BDD028253 \addons\a3l_schultz_obj.pbo
37A16A6EE561D7839151BC88AAAC72B0A737881A \addons\A3L_Subaru_Police.pbo
D61A138AA1FA7052C6023B96DE23B70D8E7964E0 \addons\a3l_swertvest.pbo
FA4E99FDB411A3D330B7C37EABCE23F74AD5107A \addons\a3l_taser.pbo
73884A513B37AD8C52824802ED2E7387547AB922 \addons\a3l_towtruck.pbo
this aswell
871851378C11ABE6E3420BEB667D10FF7EB11F00 \addons\RH_acc_cfg.pbo
30360DED65297B93502CA19326A9AE9C3DC67426 \addons\rh_de.pbo
7B93016838E335624ADC4880A19A2E12BEFF7E12 \addons\RH_M4_cfg.pbo
hlc aswell
6051B49BD7E6B258B97863CC0F7ED806BBABEACD \addons\hlc_core.pbo
EFAD75DD2F1F58FD668FB1AB084E5C9B7F17ECBA \addons\hlc_wp_aug.pbo
F0459EC77BFFE2F01DDEADC91B110B4B65C07827 \addons\hlc_wp_mp5.pbo
another of the rh pbos AA79A27B6DB2CBB1DEDE5B8C0574C043AD3648A7 \addons\RH_acc.pbo
@blissful arch I have Matthew Longtime on Steam, if you wish for me to ask him to take down his workshop addons that contain your map, I can do? Saves a long legal case.
That was a perfectly good suggestion until you said “Saves a long legal case”.
@ionic iron the mods aren't in those modpacks.
they are old by the looks of things.
its looks like its not the first time he has done it tho
@fossil basalt Haha, I’ve never been through a DMCA case so I’m unsure on the timing.
he tried to to do to uk like mod, a3l and a few others
@blissful arch Yeah, I knew Matthew since he was a short time developer for me. He’s pretty much like that, copy and pasta and claim it’s his.
he removes my comments when i warn him too
Is he on the Bohemia Forum by any chance?
i dont think so.
@ionic iron May know
@fossil basalt I don’t know him that well I’m sorry, he was only on my team for around a week.
I’ll have a look then. If he is, he won’t be for much longer.
He doesn’t deserve to be on the forums if he’s going around using other people’s content and claiming as his own.
That was my point.
If you want anything sending to him directly then let me know, I can easily drop a message to him.
Yes, tell him to contact me via Private Message on the Bohemia Interactive Forums (Arma 3). I am FallujahMadic -FM- there.
I don't think he is up to talking to anyone xD
either that or he thinks he can get away with using my map xD
We’ll soon find out.
yup
Okay, I’ve messaged him exactly what you messaged.
@fossil basalt He’s replies and said:
“Well them I him if it's about the map i have no intent to make a server. I simply don't see the point because I have a chance of mooring my money.”
Neither of his choices were good, but chose the worst of the two.
arma 2 dayz mod assets
sounds
and its packed with a bunch of kickass pbos
lol
If you put a IP infringement into another IP infringement, does that neutralize the infringement? 😄
But he takes no credit @mint edge Dont you know how this works?
he even has those a2 models nixon ported or whoever did lol
but those arent the issue here xd
The zombies?
Nixon and badger
If its the latest zombies, then its myself, nixon, badger, razer, and you. They have uh... Been around.
so there loose?
He thinks he has your permission CM ?
Well, i told him to drop by here a couple of hours ago, seems like he doesnt feel like it.
well unless it's removed quick before a bi guy looks it doesn't really matter what he feels like >.<
it requires rds civilian pack as fore mentioned in the mod description
if needs be i can remove the .p3d files from my mod (which i dont claim i made anything its just a compilation of other mods) and jsut write the paths to the .p3ds
Rule #1 on steam workshop: If you are not the autor of the content, you DO NOT upload it!
And it doesn't matter If it's a model, a config or even a texture
Just... don't...
This violates not just the steam eula (section 6D), but also (many) other licenses and ip rights
I know of steams and the authors license but I’m not aware of any other licences
And with permission and credit with the extension of the clause stating i did not create these that they are a compilation with edited features to match my needs i am clear
@languid hinge Doesn't work like that at all.
You need permission to upload. Saying "that's not mine" is not permission.
It's like you murder someone and then say "the knife was not mine and I never claimed it was mine".
@[TBI] Liam#4307 A clause means nothing in the judicial sense. You are not free to edit others stuff without their permission and upload it on the internet. This is not only very rude, because whoever made it might not want you to use their blood, sweat and lines of SQF and then make it into some frankenstein that the author might not agree with, or even know about, but you can also be pursued legally, we even have some creators here who have sent cease and desist letters to the people who keep uploading their stuff.
Please respect their licenses and not only ask, but make sure you get written permission for reuploading, modifying, and whatever else you wishes to do with their stuff from everyone involved. Generally this community is very hospitable as long as you are respectful and respect the time they put in to give you the ability to even make such a awesome server like you probably want to run.
Thanks
@[TBI] Liam#4307 Maybe just read the license from the steam workshop. As you are you using it by uploading your mod you agreed to that. The relevant part is section 6D, where it clearly states that you can only upload stuff that is totally your own creation or where you can present the permissions from the original creators to use and upload their stuff.
https://store.steampowered.com/subscriber_agreement/english/#6
[5:12 AM] [TBI] Liam: And with permission and credit with the extension of the clause stating i did not create these that they are a compilation with edited features to match my needs i am clear
LOL what? you are clear to proceed towars steam agreement page and educate yourself why what you just typed is 100% false
Ill change mine today, but what about ArmaX mod then? And the other 30+ mods on the workshop that do the same thing.
What ArmaX? That one https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1200979258
Where the author asked all mod authors and got permission from them? Atleast that's what he says. I'm not the author of one of the mods they are using so I don't know if they really asked or just pretend. But the mod still being up looks like they really asked
You represent and warrant to us that you have sufficient rights in all User Generated Content to grant Valve and other affected parties the licenses described under A. and B. above or in any license terms specific to the applicable Workshop-Enabled App or Workshop page. This includes, without limitation, any kind of intellectual property rights or other proprietary or personal rights affected by or included in the User Generated Content. In particular, with respect to Workshop Contributions, you represent and warrant that the Workshop Contribution was originally created by you(or, with respect to a Workshop Contribution to which others contributed besides you, by you and the other contributors, and in such case that you have the right to submit such Workshop Contribution on behalf of those other contributors).
You furthermore represent and warrant that the User Generated Content, your submission of that Content, and your granting of rights in that Content does not violate any applicable contract, law or regulation.```
@[TBI] Liam#4307 If it does not meet that legal requirement, you MUST remove the content.
@fossil basalt did i or did i not say i was working on it today?
Which means in the meantime remove the mod from the workshop.
i have a server that runs on that mod, i think for the 30 mins it will take me to rectify ill pass
Steal content, suffer the consequences.
It’s already been reported to Steam as containing stolen content.
done, enjoy
Ill change mine today, but what about ArmaX mod then? And the other 30+ mods on the workshop that do the same thing. This is one of the most stupid justifications ever. Its like asking to follow other guys jumping of a bridge. 40+ where not yet punished or discovered doing illegal things and are too dump to read the licenses they agreed by uploading their stuff and that makes it right for you to do so the same?!
Sometimes i am wondering what goes on some heads...
🤷
why can't i steal as well, when some others do it anyways - nice mentality
Can we have this as channel motto pls
https://i.imgflip.com/1xvnfi.jpg?a423791
[Armax] Mod
864 Unique Visitors
2,165 Current Subscribers
Isn't a set of subscribers should be inside a set of visitors? Why visitors counter is a few times lesser? 🤔
because people just subscribed through collections or the Arma Launcher subscribed for them when they tried to join the server
oh, sound logical
just wanted to come in here an apologise for the incident, wont happen again now i have read the rules, sorry again
I told you the law goes above all.
@languid hinge
👍
just make sure whatever your using has a compatible license and the go ahead from the creators
for example my stuff i put out i personally dont care if people use it as the legal trouble is too much of a hassle, but 99% of all modders WILL have trouble with it
not to mention content with incompatible licenses is 100% bad, like dayz stuff
as stated before anything you post onto the workshop is essentially you claiming ownership, so unless the ip rights holder says so its basically a no
I can tell you a story about that cough
lol
🤔
Well this is funny xD
just been invited to this group because 100% DMCA Ignored is important xD
So hosting not on steam workshop? But that's usually like 100% okay
It's only an issue with WS because Valve require content rights are transferred to them. And that linking of Steam profiles to the file workshop item suggests permissions and ownership that the uploader doesn't have
@blissful arch Excuse me, don't you slag me off 
Your basically giving people a way around dmca's ? its cuntish thing to do tbh
Well have fun hosting your mods offshore... Not like we have any problems with that
I also host tons of mods on my server
no
well.. If you call downloading "stealing" 😄
I don't know any mod maker that goes after private arma3sync repo's or google drive uploads of their mods.
So have fun hosting it outside of steam workshop and having people use it
I believe the prime reason why they don’t is due to the hassle involved
exactly. And same hassle for people getting mods from them
compared to the steam workshop audience that is probably not worth it
🍿 this was a fun read today thanks!
some justice got dispensed while i was out in the sunshine. gj lads.
@soft egret They won’t be hosting any mods, that’ll be off limits. I’m only doing web hosting to begin with.
It's not like you're not easy to be held liable living in the UK 🤔
Oof
@tawny sentinel Haha that's true. I totally live in Pakistan 😉
@Chris_Lutz_(audiocustoms)#5482 Hey now you can even swear at the guy above in your native language since you're both German! ^^
submission network? kinky 1 CUP 2 players sort of thing?
Ive noticed a trend of VAC bans on the offending addons uploading peoples profiles
kinda tells a lot about persons morale I guess
concerning how drunk steam workshop size info is... https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=620019431 yeah...
0.000MB, nice. Hopefully you can make it a negative value some day and thus offer users a free memory upgrade 😄
lol the code for steam workshop is a little bit "special"
i wonder if they ever ask focus groups of users for feedback?
probably like most games companies, they just ignore the forums full of hot air/ feedback, unless one of their staff reads a good idea.
IT has always been kinda organic, not really on a par with most professional business.
just try keeping a contractor to spec in a multimillion pound goivernment IT contract and watch them look at you perplexed tha tyou're referring to such documents...
"the spec is just the starting point" == "contractor: we will make what we think is cool/ cost-effective, throw that spec away" == "owner: but what about meeting the needs of our users?" == "contractor: oh that'll cost you more"
anyway, that's all in the past hehe
This one is the same from A2 right? https://sketchfab.com/models/d2140327aa45411bb7065658c81d861a
@carmine folio Yes https://pp.userapi.com/c846216/v846216685/4862f/DhhsuvGjL78.jpg
@Megadeth#8503 you can drop the link to the infringements email on the channel topic
Its altererade done
So, not sure where to put this to be honest so I'll hope im right here. I just noticed some of my mods have been uploaded on Armaholic without my knowledge and while full credit is given I still dont like how it happened without consent, does anyone here know who I should contact or who is responsible for uploads from the workshop to armaholic?
Armaholic support email will reach them and they can fix that.
Armaholic staff collects mods for hosting but if you dont want yours there just let them know and theyll correct it
Ah okay, well I dont really have an issue with it but I'd like to be informed at least. I'll get in touch with them, thank you!
Which mods by chance @cinder ridge ?
Noticed my Sabre planes integration for FoW, but its fine, i mean credit is given I was just rather suprised as I didnt know that the staff was uploading mods too, always thought it was community members...
Armaholic is also uploading mods without asking and giving them their own version number even if that doesn't exist.
Armaholic has TFAR 0.9.13 which doesn't exist.. I wonder what they do if I'd release a real 0.9.13...
Weeewie
@soft egret AFAIK they copy the version numbers from PWS, which has fucked versioning
@echo orchid hey wait.. Isn't the ACUs in the RHS mod prohibited to retexture as per your EULA?
recent screenshot in the Arma 3 photography thread triggered me
sure enough.. ACU in OEF-CP from Extra RHS Uniform Re-Textures Mod
Notify me of any offending post and it shall be removed PuFu.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=920257026 Napf Map.
Napf was made by "#momo#" for Arma 2.
The original forum post by #momo# links to https://angryinsects.de/ where you can get the Arma 3 version. So sounds like that one would be legit. But not the steam upload by a guy who'se name doesn't appear on angryinsects.de and has several VAC bans already
The group once had their own official Napf upload on the workshop but removed it for some reason. They also removed the BIF post for it and asked moderators to delete the thread. So I guess they don't want it to be out there anymore
There is now also a Mass Effect Mod for Arma...
I wonder have they made models in Mass Effects spirit themselves or is this the unfortunate classical case?
how much does EA want to keep their IP in check?
They say the made it themselves. But it looks like it's the same guys as with SWOP
ah
another one bites the dust ```
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198193340501/
hartixd55 summary:Project Life I Tanoa
You have to keep in mind that he is a professional!
His forum link is http://Forum:http://<domain that doesn't exist>.de/upload/forum/
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1361987046 Is that the upload you mean or is that something different? That doesn't look like project life... but he even links the mod's that he ripped in the description of the item 🤦
@soft egret can you look if there are any kka3* files in there as well? I don't have the time rn
I remember the name of the mod pack, but I was too lazy to file an Dmca
yeah. kka3_gestures
Alright, thank you
What do you guys use to check stuff like that?
The one and only great Workshop-Crawler: https://beta.workshopcrawler.com/
Ohh, this will be well used! Thanks
Or you could just subscribe to the mod, download it and look at the pbos. Most thefts are pretty easy to recognize.
Yeah thats true
@safe arrow What about a page where you can download a specific mods files
Basically you first get a page where all files of the mod are listed, and then you can handpick specific ones to download
Are re-uploads of task_force_radio and CBA allowed?
CBA yes. TFAR http://radio.task-force.ru/en/#readme-uitem-9
Okay, I've already filled a DMCA report against this re-upload but here it is > https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=945425481
You filed a DMCA?
DMCA's can only be filed by people that have the right to the content
That's me and Nkey.
Oooo, oh well. They can only reject it.
NEVER, like really NEVER file a DMCA on content that is not yours. A false claim is a criminal offense
Oh well. You chaps can take me to court. Mistakes happen.
Why are people always too lazy to read the texts popping up... be it the licenses of the mods, the steam licenses or in this case the popups asking "are you the orginal rights owner of this content" when you select DCMA. Seems really hard to do....
If you are not the owner its totally sufficent to either report the mod or/and inform the orginal owner.
That's a very true point but rather keep comments like that in your head otherwise ping me next time.
Why so? Its just stating the obvious as a hint for others to avoid the same mistake. Its not me doing anything wrong. Anyone here wants reuploads to be taken down. But it still should be done in the right way.
@ionic iron
Why so offended? You fucked up, confessed in a public chat, peepz telling you the facts, deal with it...
I'm not so offended, I did fuck up and I'm not denying otherwise but there's no need for two people to comment on the action after one person already has. Anyway, I don't believe there is any offense in the UK about Copyfraud according to my research.
For fraud, there is. And you’ve committed fraud by saying you’re the owner.
Ohhh no no, I didn't select the 'I'm the owner now take this down or else' box.
As DMCAs can only be filed by the owner ....
☝
It's not a box. There are two radio buttons. Either "I am the rightful owner" or "I am authorized by the rightful owner"
No thats not totally true, also this is stated at the beginning there is a multiple selection option later on where you can state that you are not the owner
You have to choose one. And both are wrong
☝️
A wait, i see, 2 round selection options and 2 additional. Yep, i see
Ah. Fuck it, take me to court. Shit happens.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1137994457 TFAR Dev build isn't allowed there right?
ah yeah. Correct. I'll file the DMCA for that
Haha cheeky but thank you ❤
There is a load on the Workshop Crawler that was listed above.
Don't have enough time for all of them
No, I don't blame you. There are loads. There are a few dev build ones if you want them since I would think they're a priority over the public build?
Nah. You can report them via the normal Steam report if you want to do good. Just link to the TFAR website that I sent you before.
But I don't have time for DMCA'ing in general
Alright, I will do just that. It saves time for yourself. Thank you.
this clown has a workshop full of stolen shit
i sent takedowns on my stuff that was stolen
i hide my shit behind some funny mod names so nobody gets suspicious
But there's still a report button (non-DMCA) right?
ye
what would be sick as hell is if steam blocked any duplicate files until the original poster of the files clicks Yes to the upload or No to block it
90% of the apes don't even touch the pbo they just resign it
that doesn't really do anything :3
unless owners do the dmca thing.. they stay up
nothing needed 😃 i already dmca'd mine.. i just posted the profile here so ppls know
10 or so other reuploads of my shit already got taken down
@mint edge
This was suggested a long time ago, but BI has no hold on such things, and Valve simply doesn't give a moist shit. It's less a hassle for them with the current DMCA process then implementing a system that prevents dublicates...
and the dmca system works :3
bi could implement something with the publisher though
or recruit some trusted community ppls as ws moderators
not even BI has the full ability to moderate the workshop
valve restriction
iirc
the publisher is just a simple upload tool without much capabilities. it would, if it uses a database like the crawler. but this means much more work and maintenance for BI. not going to happen, since a lot of peepz have been moved to other BI projects
¯_(ツ)_/¯
That sure is some mystery shit 403_xx on all his uploads... a couple are over 2gig, youd think hed be proud of his work and label it correctly lol
all bi can do is make a mod incompatible and eventually get it taken down
and incompatible is literally just a statement at the top of the workshop file lol
@dull moon They sure as hell will have the same problem with dayz so they should probably come back to this topic 😅
Well, you showed them the perfect opportunity how this can work. All BI has to do is to step up to you and work it out further more.......
A simple blocker at upload stage would solve most problems.. even if you can upload other ways it would stop most people + you would need to have steps showing how a collection works etc to show the right way to do it
Block & educate
= more work for BI -> not happening
Automate the process or it won’t happen
I mean what you need to have for a simple "is this already on the workshop?" is not much, the crawler was little work, most time was just waiting for it to finish indexing
I think it would be little work for someone at Bohemia to make it, they probably just don't have someone available to do it
If they had the resources they could expand upon the idea and have the publisher index your mod for you directly before upload and then send that off to their servers to run a simple check. If you added a database to that where known mods could "register" their workshop item to be the original source for specific pbo hashes, you could then deny upload for those pbos to other people
Just a quick thought
I can imagine though that given the structure at bi or companies in general things would take considerably longer and would require more resources
And they are probably busy for the next few months already
I imagine the contract between valve and bi has some implications to this, and it isn’t worth bi spending a fortune negotiating with valve even if valve permitted it
Our solution was to make a blacklist and any persistent offender esp the ones who send death threats and pages of personal abuse get added to it, and then our mod does not work very well for them any more
It turns into a slapstick comedy of unfortunate accidents and terrible equipment failures
I'd still love to do the validation DLL for mods but it's too easy to just remove the dependency on them
Just decided to test out the workshop crawler, Strangely, a few days ago, someone reuploaded a map I did. I am not the original creator of the map however, I have massively adapted on the Kelley's Island source to make it look a bit less strange. The only thing left made by Andino is the config, I redid all sat, mask, objects and roads. Am I still in a position to file a takedown eventhough I was not the original original creator?
depends on the license for kelley's island
With this licence you are free to adapt (i.e. modify, rework or update) and share (i.e. copy, distribute or transmit) the material under the following conditions:
Attribution - You must attribute the material in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the material).
Noncommercial - You may not use this material for any commercial purposes.
Arma Only - You may not convert or adapt this material to be used in other games than Arma.
Share Alike - If you adapt, or build upon this material, you may distribute the resulting material only under the same license.
so in other words, another modder can take your work and adapt it under the SA license. and then upload it to steam. if the ydidn't change anything and just uploaded it, you could object, but if the ychange the name or description to their own preference, then so long as the yattribute, and apply a similar compatible license to theirwork, you can't object.
if they didnt apply a license to itthen the yhave breached your license. and likewise if yo udidnt apply a license to your map release, the nyou breached the original authors license.
hope that helps!
Is stuff like this allowed?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jMQyCEvQBUQ7wXk0l0aM3ci0D-rjc1i0/view
PSISYN is known for stealing stuff. so probably not
main thing to check - does he use any mods in his monetized server that he doesn't have permission for.
he also used content stolen from my server so I've DMCA his server and that file repo
One more reupload: https://drive.google.com/file/d/11nN_Dgfqq4EVszZ-M_62o2DPI8hookNV/view
Uploading is not the problem (if not on Steam Workshop). But it has to be checked if those mods are all allowing monetized servers. Otherwhise you can report it directly to BI to take care of them for violating the licenses, as PsySin is listed on their page: of monetized servers: https://www.bohemia.net/monetization/approved/arma3
Oh and this one applies for monetized servers:
You may, but ONLY if you have proper permission from all of the authors of such mods. Monetizing without it contravenes our licenses.```
https://www.bohemia.net/monetization/faq#!#c7
that last repo the malden one dose not have our content in it but the original line dose
Did you see any unsung in it? Uns or csj prefix? Cba to download 8gb to check 😉
What if they renamed the pbos? 
renaming alone won't do good, since this will most likly fuck up the internal path structure. but if one would go through the hassle of converting all the stolen stuff to his own namespace, there is still the search for model hashes... you can not fuck those 😉
Can't unpack on my linux server. Because it's not plain RAR format
lol
lol
ape responses
😂
1st question is why?
I mean, the rook is a silly simple model, I could make it in a day, easy..
Hell, I'm sure there is a fallout 4 model you could re-skin to look like it..
Wait... https://www.reddit.com/r/intel/comments/8n4zz0/retrieve_files_from_ram_whilst_the_program_using/
but they scramble most of the important data on purpose because the developers are little shitbrains. Sounds like mikeros obfuscation
https://www.reddit.com/r/rpcs3/comments/8ikun3/how_do_i_dump_my_ps3_discs/
That guy is really just an idiot that tries to rip content everywhere and thinks copyright doesn't apply to him