Inconsistent use of sci notation vs. numbers on reactors | Unnamed Space Idle | Page 1

#Inconsistent use of sci notation vs. numbers on reactors

6 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

echo burrow May 10, 2024, 4:14 PM

I wouldn't necessary call this a bug, per se, but the use of sci notation vs. long form of 4 digit numbers on the reactor passive is inconsistent.

Note here how the S. Battle T4 has "1.11e4x" as its value at 0/100 passive for T4. However, Capital Battle T4 which has 1/100 charge and thus has a passive benefit of "6056x". Despite both representing 4-digit values, the swap from sci notation back to long form is inconsistent.

"Fighters T4", which also has 0/100 levels, is also using a 4 digit value of "1112x", so I have no idea what determines why it would use one over the other. Purely UI, though.

arctic tangle May 10, 2024, 4:24 PM

1.11e4 = 11,100 -- 5 digits

echo burrow May 10, 2024, 7:13 PM

lol oops

So I guess some base values at T4 are five digits, some base values are at 4 digits?

arctic tangle May 10, 2024, 7:15 PM

Yeah think so

echo burrow May 10, 2024, 8:00 PM

Okay, so this isn't a bug at all, then. Sorry!